<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wartime Prez comes out from behind Hughes&#8217; big pants to hide behind Cheney&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/511.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/511.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: neochristian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/511.html#comment-12013</link>
		<dc:creator>neochristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2004 02:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/wordpress/archives/000511.html#comment-12013</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;This may be why Bush may win:&lt;/b&gt;

Then in 1988, when we won with the Bush senior campaign and carried the highest total of evangelical votes ever in American history, we lost as we always do -- the Republicans -- we lost the Jewish vote and the Hispanic vote and all those votes. We lost the Catholic vote. We were the first modern presidency to win an election and it was a landslide and not win the Catholic vote. It was barely, but we lost the Catholic vote.

How did we do it? We carried 82 percent or 83 percent of the evangelical vote. I remember when it was all over-- this was one of the reasons I got a job in the White House -- but I remember when it was all over, there was great shock from me and others saying, &quot;Whoa, this is unhealthy.&quot; We immediately began going after the Catholic vote.

While at the same time, we were frightened by the fact that we lost all these votes and still won the White House. The message did come home. My God, you can win the White House with nothing but evangelicals if you can get enough of them, if you get them all, and they&#039;re a huge number. ...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jesus/interviews/wead.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Jesus Factor&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>This may be why Bush may win:</b></p>
<p>Then in 1988, when we won with the Bush senior campaign and carried the highest total of evangelical votes ever in American history, we lost as we always do &#8212; the Republicans &#8212; we lost the Jewish vote and the Hispanic vote and all those votes. We lost the Catholic vote. We were the first modern presidency to win an election and it was a landslide and not win the Catholic vote. It was barely, but we lost the Catholic vote.</p>
<p>How did we do it? We carried 82 percent or 83 percent of the evangelical vote. I remember when it was all over&#8211; this was one of the reasons I got a job in the White House &#8212; but I remember when it was all over, there was great shock from me and others saying, &#8220;Whoa, this is unhealthy.&#8221; We immediately began going after the Catholic vote.</p>
<p>While at the same time, we were frightened by the fact that we lost all these votes and still won the White House. The message did come home. My God, you can win the White House with nothing but evangelicals if you can get enough of them, if you get them all, and they&#8217;re a huge number. &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jesus/interviews/wead.html" rel="nofollow">The Jesus Factor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OTB</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/511.html#comment-12012</link>
		<dc:creator>OTB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2004 03:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/wordpress/archives/000511.html#comment-12012</guid>
		<description>http://www.humanities.mq.edu.au/Ockham/y6703.html

&quot;A Timarchy is a military aristocracy, ambitious of Honour (time in Greek), like Sparta. The ideal city might decay into a timocracy by dissension among the Guardians, if some of them sought private property and wanted to reduce the other classes to slavery; they would neglect education and distrust intelligence. The corresponding &#039;timarchic&#039; individual is competitive, arrogant, dictatorial, harsh to slaves, respectful to those above him, ambitious for promotion -- an &#039;authoritarian&#039; personality.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.humanities.mq.edu.au/Ockham/y6703.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.humanities.mq.edu.au/Ockham/y6703.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;A Timarchy is a military aristocracy, ambitious of Honour (time in Greek), like Sparta. The ideal city might decay into a timocracy by dissension among the Guardians, if some of them sought private property and wanted to reduce the other classes to slavery; they would neglect education and distrust intelligence. The corresponding &#8216;timarchic&#8217; individual is competitive, arrogant, dictatorial, harsh to slaves, respectful to those above him, ambitious for promotion &#8212; an &#8216;authoritarian&#8217; personality.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MO</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/511.html#comment-12011</link>
		<dc:creator>MO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 22:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/wordpress/archives/000511.html#comment-12011</guid>
		<description>With all due respect to Tom Tomorrow, real babies are capable of being funny and charming sometimes and Baby President is not. It&#039;s an insult to compare real, normal babies with this spoiled, self-absorbed, stupid freak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect to Tom Tomorrow, real babies are capable of being funny and charming sometimes and Baby President is not. It&#8217;s an insult to compare real, normal babies with this spoiled, self-absorbed, stupid freak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/511.html#comment-12010</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/wordpress/archives/000511.html#comment-12010</guid>
		<description>If this buffoon is a Great Wartime President my dog is Alexander the Great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this buffoon is a Great Wartime President my dog is Alexander the Great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Partisan J</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/511.html#comment-12009</link>
		<dc:creator>Partisan J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/wordpress/archives/000511.html#comment-12009</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m beginning to hate freedom so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m beginning to hate freedom so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenstonecottage</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/511.html#comment-12008</link>
		<dc:creator>glenstonecottage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 05:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/wordpress/archives/000511.html#comment-12008</guid>
		<description>Why does Carie LeMack hate freedom so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does Carie LeMack hate freedom so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

