Brad & Gavin don’t delete comments, so either you’re lying…or you made the comment in the wrong area.

Evidence provides proof. Comments are nothing without evidence.

I guess I’ll take it as a compliment to my debating skills. Good luck in the future! Don’t be evil.

BUT.

I’m MORE sick of annie angel bringing her dilapidated old visage around these parts, neglecting to use her stupid nom de plume, and spewing her anti-left crap at us in thinly veiled / poorly written screed.

If, as your blog claims, you are tired of talking to us ‘because we don’t listen’ to you, then shut the hell up already and go away!

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/magazine/galleries/2006/0115/photos_of_2005?pg=12

This style of “writing” was all the rage in the ad copywriting world about six years ago, back when I still did that sort of thing. Then, after burning very brightly for a short while, the enthusiasm for this style of copy seemed to flash out pretty quickly.

It’s no surprise that Michelle is still hanging on to an affectation discarded by ad guys years ago.

Some see a Mosque that’s been ‘burned and blown up’, while others more optimistically see a Mosque that isn’t quite burned down to the ground yet.
And some pessimists might see a ‘downer’ of an AP story attributed to a police man, and a more optimistic person would say ‘that guy never existed and that never happened!’ Who’s to say whats fact and whats fiction… its all your perspective! And after going to the mosque and seeing it with your own eyes that’s no reason to change your perspective on the events.

Oh, and did Malkin even try to find this mysterious man that all the right-wing blogs pronounced non-existant? I bet she looked around the airport and concluded ‘Nope, no Jammy Husseins here.’

P.S. great onion ring joke.

Simple explanation? A lot of the Wingnut Wurlitzer Welfare Wankers simply make stuff up. They decide how a particular event should have happened — or, for the truly lazy, they get the fax explaining what all paid-up WWWW now believe about that event — and that’s what they “report”. When it turns out the truth is more, uh, ‘nuanced’ than ‘Dirty hippies spit on crippled vet, eat babies & kick starving dog’, they just crank up the volume on their imaginary “reporting”.

And — sadly, yes! — they assume that us moonbats are doing the same thing… making stuff up, parroting the faxes from our paymasters, shouting loudly when Ugly Reality threatens to break through the noise from the circus calliope. Because in Wingnut Wurlitzer Welfare Wanker World, there are no unbiased observers — only high-dollar courtesans and low-rent hookers. And if that kid keeps saying that the Emperor has no clothes, he must be a paid moonbat agent spreading disinformation meant to discourage the emperor’s hardworking trainbearers.

No wonder the WWWW hate us so much. There’s nothing a prostitute hates more than someone who’s “giving It away”. Because people who claim they’re having sex just for fun not only cut into the prospective sex-buyers market, they make the hardworking sexual professionals look like, well, whores!

…fails to link to either my post at mm.com….

(link added) What, she can’t even be bothered to spell out her own domain name? Or does she really think she’s Minnesota MicroNet? Who knows what delusions lurk in the hearts of wingnuts?

Attributing “destroyed” mosques to AP would appear to either be an invention or a gripe about something which was withdrawn/corrected so early that it cannot be found anywhere, which is equally as lame.

Dirtiest trackback ever.