<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wingnut Welfare Mamas: The Expanded List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: These days, those days</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-997969</link>
		<dc:creator>These days, those days</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-997969</guid>
		<description>Star Parker&#039;s gotta make the top ten list, for her history of going on welfare and then trying to get rid of it for those who are still poor.

Another notable individual is Leonard Peikoff.  He&#039;s an Objectivist wingnut, a follower of Ayn Rand.  Objectivism isn&#039;t the same as regular Republican wingnuts, and may not be as bad, but there&#039;s plenty of similarity.  Ayn Rand, of course, was a self-made woman, which is part of the reason why she was so insistent on the concept in her &quot;philosophy&quot; of Objectivism.  

And with her philosophy of selfishness, she never did get around to becoming a mother, and so she designated Leonard Peikoff as her philosophical heir.  Peikoff wasn&#039;t the first guy to have a chance at being the heir; Nathaniel Branden had a shot at it, but he blew it by disagreeing with Rand about a few issues.   Peikoff agreed with Rand so completely that Ayn Rand decided to make her the heir.  He gets the royalties on Atlas Shrugged, and he gets to be the spokesman for Ayn Rand&#039;s opinions for his whole life.  Really, would anyone care what he has to say if he weren&#039;t in the Ayn Rand Institute:?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Parker&#8217;s gotta make the top ten list, for her history of going on welfare and then trying to get rid of it for those who are still poor.</p>
<p>Another notable individual is Leonard Peikoff.  He&#8217;s an Objectivist wingnut, a follower of Ayn Rand.  Objectivism isn&#8217;t the same as regular Republican wingnuts, and may not be as bad, but there&#8217;s plenty of similarity.  Ayn Rand, of course, was a self-made woman, which is part of the reason why she was so insistent on the concept in her &#8220;philosophy&#8221; of Objectivism.  </p>
<p>And with her philosophy of selfishness, she never did get around to becoming a mother, and so she designated Leonard Peikoff as her philosophical heir.  Peikoff wasn&#8217;t the first guy to have a chance at being the heir; Nathaniel Branden had a shot at it, but he blew it by disagreeing with Rand about a few issues.   Peikoff agreed with Rand so completely that Ayn Rand decided to make her the heir.  He gets the royalties on Atlas Shrugged, and he gets to be the spokesman for Ayn Rand&#8217;s opinions for his whole life.  Really, would anyone care what he has to say if he weren&#8217;t in the Ayn Rand Institute:?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadly, No! &#187; Symphony in Retarded Minor</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119223</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadly, No! &#187; Symphony in Retarded Minor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 02:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119223</guid>
		<description>[...] Why, hello! It&#8217;s Dinesh D&#8217;Souza! No, no, no &#8230; it&#8217;s not a bad time at all. Do come in, Dinesh. Hey gang, guess who&#8217;s here? Dinesh D&#8217;Souza! We were just talking about you, Dinesh! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why, hello! It&#8217;s Dinesh D&#8217;Souza! No, no, no &#8230; it&#8217;s not a bad time at all. Do come in, Dinesh. Hey gang, guess who&#8217;s here? Dinesh D&#8217;Souza! We were just talking about you, Dinesh! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Warmth</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119166</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Warmth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119166</guid>
		<description>Bay Buchanan.  Would we even know she was alive if not for Pat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bay Buchanan.  Would we even know she was alive if not for Pat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAS</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119140</link>
		<dc:creator>DAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119140</guid>
		<description>David Gelernter&#039;s hardly a wingnut welfare queen:  he actually has some serious cred in his area of expertise (parallel computing) and even some of us liberals who work with computers a lot are sympathetic to his moderate partial ludditism (nothing like programming one of these computer suckers to make one hate the beasts!).  Actually, while Gelernter&#039;s always been a conservative, I long thought (maybe just based on what I know of his opinions of technology) of him as a conservative per se -- i.e. someone who wishes to be cautious about change -- rather than as a winger of any particular sort.  When did he drink the neo-con kool-aid?  Did the Unabomber&#039;s bomb damage his brain or something?  Or was he always an AEI fellow-travelor politically?  Are his politics a matter of him being good in his area of expertise and related matters but silly outside of computer related things?  At least he&#039;s not silly about computer related things like the techno-glibertarians are ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Gelernter&#8217;s hardly a wingnut welfare queen:  he actually has some serious cred in his area of expertise (parallel computing) and even some of us liberals who work with computers a lot are sympathetic to his moderate partial ludditism (nothing like programming one of these computer suckers to make one hate the beasts!).  Actually, while Gelernter&#8217;s always been a conservative, I long thought (maybe just based on what I know of his opinions of technology) of him as a conservative per se &#8212; i.e. someone who wishes to be cautious about change &#8212; rather than as a winger of any particular sort.  When did he drink the neo-con kool-aid?  Did the Unabomber&#8217;s bomb damage his brain or something?  Or was he always an AEI fellow-travelor politically?  Are his politics a matter of him being good in his area of expertise and related matters but silly outside of computer related things?  At least he&#8217;s not silly about computer related things like the techno-glibertarians are &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duros62</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119138</link>
		<dc:creator>Duros62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119138</guid>
		<description>What, no Condoleeza Lies-a-lot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, no Condoleeza Lies-a-lot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy pilgrim</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119105</link>
		<dc:creator>billy pilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119105</guid>
		<description>Of course GWB is the Top Queen in the Wingnut Welfare Queen ranking.  He&#039;s their Dear Leader, after all; they all recognize his total lack of accomplishment while simultaneously  seeming to be a man of accomplishment.

Seriously.  It&#039;s like performance art or something.  Andy Kaufman would be amazed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course GWB is the Top Queen in the Wingnut Welfare Queen ranking.  He&#8217;s their Dear Leader, after all; they all recognize his total lack of accomplishment while simultaneously  seeming to be a man of accomplishment.</p>
<p>Seriously.  It&#8217;s like performance art or something.  Andy Kaufman would be amazed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff R.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119083</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119083</guid>
		<description>I think some of the suggestions here are a little off target.  You have to consider what this person would be doing if they weren&#039;t on the WW dole.  Jonah Goldberg is what I consider to be the archetype.  He&#039;s not a particularly talented writer, but he&#039;s no where near the level of the language challenged WND writers regularly mocked on this blog.  He&#039;s a sloppy, careless thinker and writer and more than willing to ignore reality to push the right wing line.  The only reason he&#039;s where his is now  is that he was in close proximity to the Lewinsky tapes.  

Contrast Goldberg with Victor Davis Hanson.  He&#039;s done some well respected and innovative work in his area of specialty:  ancient Greek warfare.  It&#039;s when he tries to link that to the present is where he goes off the rails.  John Derbyshire has written a copule of well reviewd books on the history of mathematics.  Christopher Hitchens, whatever you think of him now, is a talented writer.  The Powerline guys and Reynolds are practicing lawyers.   Limbaugh&#039;s a special case.  He wouldn&#039;t be nearly successful as he is if he wasn&#039;t braying the conservative talking points.  But he does have some talent:  he has a great radio voice and his show is a pretty slick production.  His money comes not from conservative donors, but from advertisers.

So before you nominate someone, think whether this person would be a low level corporate drone if they hadn&#039;t somehow fallen into the wingnut welfare machine.  (No offense intended to fellow low level coporate drones.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think some of the suggestions here are a little off target.  You have to consider what this person would be doing if they weren&#8217;t on the WW dole.  Jonah Goldberg is what I consider to be the archetype.  He&#8217;s not a particularly talented writer, but he&#8217;s no where near the level of the language challenged WND writers regularly mocked on this blog.  He&#8217;s a sloppy, careless thinker and writer and more than willing to ignore reality to push the right wing line.  The only reason he&#8217;s where his is now  is that he was in close proximity to the Lewinsky tapes.  </p>
<p>Contrast Goldberg with Victor Davis Hanson.  He&#8217;s done some well respected and innovative work in his area of specialty:  ancient Greek warfare.  It&#8217;s when he tries to link that to the present is where he goes off the rails.  John Derbyshire has written a copule of well reviewd books on the history of mathematics.  Christopher Hitchens, whatever you think of him now, is a talented writer.  The Powerline guys and Reynolds are practicing lawyers.   Limbaugh&#8217;s a special case.  He wouldn&#8217;t be nearly successful as he is if he wasn&#8217;t braying the conservative talking points.  But he does have some talent:  he has a great radio voice and his show is a pretty slick production.  His money comes not from conservative donors, but from advertisers.</p>
<p>So before you nominate someone, think whether this person would be a low level corporate drone if they hadn&#8217;t somehow fallen into the wingnut welfare machine.  (No offense intended to fellow low level coporate drones.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Col. Klink</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119068</link>
		<dc:creator>Col. Klink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119068</guid>
		<description>The Kagan children merit a very special place in Wingnut Welfare Hell. Aside from the fact Frederick and Robert and both exceedingly lame and the fact that Frederick will go down as an enormous failure for having contributed to thousands of deaths in Iraq and expanding a winless war, brother Robert gets the special Stanley Cup Trophy of Neocon Welfare Wingnuts since the European mocking slime bucket actually lives in Bruxelles with his family. (Of course, we hate Old Europe, which is why we elect to live here. But don&#039;t tell that to the Red-staters who buy my shit though.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kagan children merit a very special place in Wingnut Welfare Hell. Aside from the fact Frederick and Robert and both exceedingly lame and the fact that Frederick will go down as an enormous failure for having contributed to thousands of deaths in Iraq and expanding a winless war, brother Robert gets the special Stanley Cup Trophy of Neocon Welfare Wingnuts since the European mocking slime bucket actually lives in Bruxelles with his family. (Of course, we hate Old Europe, which is why we elect to live here. But don&#8217;t tell that to the Red-staters who buy my shit though.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Djur</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119064</link>
		<dc:creator>Djur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119064</guid>
		<description>Mand Ttaca: Naw. 1) Hitchens has a modicum of talent, although drink has corroded most of it. He&#039;s still a decent polemicist. 2) He doesn&#039;t consistently tow the Republican line, which makes his abject apology for Bush all the more shameful. 3) He was not fabricated as a wingnut, lifted out of the primordial ooze and shaped into a shill.  Similarly, David Horowitz isn&#039;t on wingnut welfare because he started off as an activist in his own right (although a shitty one). 4) Hitchens isn&#039;t being paid off, and he doesn&#039;t really need payola or jobs from right-wing magazines. I mean, he&#039;s the one who basically decided to stop writing for &lt;i&gt;The Nation&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mand Ttaca: Naw. 1) Hitchens has a modicum of talent, although drink has corroded most of it. He&#8217;s still a decent polemicist. 2) He doesn&#8217;t consistently tow the Republican line, which makes his abject apology for Bush all the more shameful. 3) He was not fabricated as a wingnut, lifted out of the primordial ooze and shaped into a shill.  Similarly, David Horowitz isn&#8217;t on wingnut welfare because he started off as an activist in his own right (although a shitty one). 4) Hitchens isn&#8217;t being paid off, and he doesn&#8217;t really need payola or jobs from right-wing magazines. I mean, he&#8217;s the one who basically decided to stop writing for <i>The Nation</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mand Ttaca</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119033</link>
		<dc:creator>Mand Ttaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119033</guid>
		<description>I nominate Chris Hitchens.   

For a while he was able to ride by stretching facts, pulling obscure names of Iraqi clerics and power players and concocting some creative connections.  But stretching will only go so far.

For the past year, Hitchens has proved to be a great source of material for delirium researchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I nominate Chris Hitchens.   </p>
<p>For a while he was able to ride by stretching facts, pulling obscure names of Iraqi clerics and power players and concocting some creative connections.  But stretching will only go so far.</p>
<p>For the past year, Hitchens has proved to be a great source of material for delirium researchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ran</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119024</link>
		<dc:creator>ran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119024</guid>
		<description>Max &quot;exterminate the brutes&quot; Boot. 

Ralph &quot;blood and guts&quot; Peters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max &#8220;exterminate the brutes&#8221; Boot. </p>
<p>Ralph &#8220;blood and guts&#8221; Peters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Silverstein</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119010</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Silverstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-119010</guid>
		<description>I know she&#039;s a has-been already, but what about Peggy Noonan?  And Anne?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know she&#8217;s a has-been already, but what about Peggy Noonan?  And Anne?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pluky</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118980</link>
		<dc:creator>pluky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118980</guid>
		<description>Sometimes the biggest is the least obvious. I nominate GW &quot;Shrub&quot; Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes the biggest is the least obvious. I nominate GW &#8220;Shrub&#8221; Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nostalgic4minimalstandards</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118975</link>
		<dc:creator>nostalgic4minimalstandards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118975</guid>
		<description>Ladies and gentlemen, I really think a cold-eyed, randian, objectivist, un-compassionate examination, foresaking all soul-destryoing altruism and using only Aristotelian logic and scientifically deducible facts, must force us to the conclusion that kingubu is right: George W. Bush is not only the Queen Bee among Wingnut Welfare Queens, he represents the gold standard.

Lets face it, although lesser contenders may have overcome severe personal shortcomings to achieve their vaunted status, all but the Dear Leader have an unfair advantage in the sweepstakes: a minimal proficiency in the English language.

Transmuting an ability to write high school level &quot;why the patriotism and the free enterprise system makes America the best country in history&quot; essays into an upper-middle-class lifestyle is one thing.  To achieve supreme executive authority over the world&#039;s only superpower based on nothing but a faux-good-ol&#039;-boy persona and family connections is an achievement that may never be repeated.

I would also like to propose an  offical motto for &quot;The Ownership Society&quot;: We Hire the Handicapped.

I offer these thoughts to you in a purely cold-hearted selfish way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladies and gentlemen, I really think a cold-eyed, randian, objectivist, un-compassionate examination, foresaking all soul-destryoing altruism and using only Aristotelian logic and scientifically deducible facts, must force us to the conclusion that kingubu is right: George W. Bush is not only the Queen Bee among Wingnut Welfare Queens, he represents the gold standard.</p>
<p>Lets face it, although lesser contenders may have overcome severe personal shortcomings to achieve their vaunted status, all but the Dear Leader have an unfair advantage in the sweepstakes: a minimal proficiency in the English language.</p>
<p>Transmuting an ability to write high school level &#8220;why the patriotism and the free enterprise system makes America the best country in history&#8221; essays into an upper-middle-class lifestyle is one thing.  To achieve supreme executive authority over the world&#8217;s only superpower based on nothing but a faux-good-ol&#8217;-boy persona and family connections is an achievement that may never be repeated.</p>
<p>I would also like to propose an  offical motto for &#8220;The Ownership Society&#8221;: We Hire the Handicapped.</p>
<p>I offer these thoughts to you in a purely cold-hearted selfish way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118970</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118970</guid>
		<description>No love for John Stossel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No love for John Stossel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118967</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118967</guid>
		<description>Sorry, can&#039;t help myself.  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://buffalobeast.com/113/50_most_loathsome_2006.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;39. Lee Raymond&lt;/a&gt;
...everybody knows this Exxon-Valdez cretin...  How does he qualify to be a welfare wingnut? &lt;blockquote&gt;
Appointed by Bush to chair a committee to &quot;lead&quot; Americas Alternative Energy Future, which is oil-billionaire code for &quot;hinder.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
His $400 retirement settlement wasn&#039;t enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, can&#8217;t help myself.<br />
<a href="http://buffalobeast.com/113/50_most_loathsome_2006.htm" rel="nofollow">39. Lee Raymond</a><br />
&#8230;everybody knows this Exxon-Valdez cretin&#8230;  How does he qualify to be a welfare wingnut?<br />
<blockquote>
Appointed by Bush to chair a committee to &#8220;lead&#8221; Americas Alternative Energy Future, which is oil-billionaire code for &#8220;hinder.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>His $400 retirement settlement wasn&#8217;t enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derelict</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118966</link>
		<dc:creator>Derelict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118966</guid>
		<description>1. Malkin has indeed published--her plea to set up concentraton camps here in the U.S. for the &quot;undesirable elements&quot; is one of the major factors that launched her into the upper echelons of the wingnut welfare system.

2. Marc--right-wing intellectual is an oxymoron. Or, perhaps more accurately, it is a chimera in that no such thing actually exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Malkin has indeed published&#8211;her plea to set up concentraton camps here in the U.S. for the &#8220;undesirable elements&#8221; is one of the major factors that launched her into the upper echelons of the wingnut welfare system.</p>
<p>2. Marc&#8211;right-wing intellectual is an oxymoron. Or, perhaps more accurately, it is a chimera in that no such thing actually exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118965</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118965</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://buffalobeast.com/113/50_most_loathsome_2006.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;7. Randall &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham&lt;/a&gt;

Charges: A shameless, filthy monster of corruption. This &quot;hero&quot; inspired Top Gun, but cried like a little bitch when he was finally busted for being a wanton congressional prostitute. Holds the record for most bribe money accepted by a representative in the history of Congress. Literally wrote up a bribery &quot;menu,&quot; listing sums to be paid for defense contracts: 10% for the first few million, with discounts for more. Lived on a yacht called the &quot;Duke Stir&quot; that was paid for by a defense contractor. Cunningham steered a contract aimed at protecting U.S. troops from IEDs in Iraq to the guy who let him have champagne â€˜nâ€™ hooker parties on his boat, trading the safety of American troops for a sweet after-prom party.

Exhibit A: Started a shoving match with a Democratic congressman over sending troops to Bosnia, then ran away and was found crying in the coatroom.

Sentence: Shanked by fellow inmate using &quot;Randy â€˜Dukeâ€™ Cunningham Fighter Ace Kalinga Style Buck Knife,&quot; complete with the Congressional seal on it, sold illegally through his website for $595.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://buffalobeast.com/113/50_most_loathsome_2006.htm" rel="nofollow">7. Randall &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham</a></p>
<p>Charges: A shameless, filthy monster of corruption. This &#8220;hero&#8221; inspired Top Gun, but cried like a little bitch when he was finally busted for being a wanton congressional prostitute. Holds the record for most bribe money accepted by a representative in the history of Congress. Literally wrote up a bribery &#8220;menu,&#8221; listing sums to be paid for defense contracts: 10% for the first few million, with discounts for more. Lived on a yacht called the &#8220;Duke Stir&#8221; that was paid for by a defense contractor. Cunningham steered a contract aimed at protecting U.S. troops from IEDs in Iraq to the guy who let him have champagne â€˜nâ€™ hooker parties on his boat, trading the safety of American troops for a sweet after-prom party.</p>
<p>Exhibit A: Started a shoving match with a Democratic congressman over sending troops to Bosnia, then ran away and was found crying in the coatroom.</p>
<p>Sentence: Shanked by fellow inmate using &#8220;Randy â€˜Dukeâ€™ Cunningham Fighter Ace Kalinga Style Buck Knife,&#8221; complete with the Congressional seal on it, sold illegally through his website for $595.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118964</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118964</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://buffalobeast.com/113/50_most_loathsome_2006.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;30. Rush Limbaugh&lt;/a&gt;

Charges: Itâ€™s hard to believe this repulsive shit fountain is even human, until you remember that we share 70% of our DNA with pigs. Then again, to be any more hypocritical Rush would actually have to be a member of another species. After the Democrats took congress in November, Limbaugh said he felt &quot;liberated&quot; because &quot;I no longer am going to have to carry the water for people who I donâ€™t think deserve having their water carried,&quot; essentially telling his listeners heâ€™d been lying to them all year. The dittoheads didnâ€™t mind; thatâ€™s why they listen.

Exhibit A: If someone had taken a shotgun and blown Rushâ€™s head clean off while he was wobbling his bloated body back and forth in an inconceivably cruel mockery of Michael J. Fox, whom he accused of faking his Parkinsonâ€™s symptoms for political effect, it would have been the greatest viral video of them all.

Sentence: Parkinsonâ€™s disease, of course, triggered by oxycontin abuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://buffalobeast.com/113/50_most_loathsome_2006.htm" rel="nofollow">30. Rush Limbaugh</a></p>
<p>Charges: Itâ€™s hard to believe this repulsive shit fountain is even human, until you remember that we share 70% of our DNA with pigs. Then again, to be any more hypocritical Rush would actually have to be a member of another species. After the Democrats took congress in November, Limbaugh said he felt &#8220;liberated&#8221; because &#8220;I no longer am going to have to carry the water for people who I donâ€™t think deserve having their water carried,&#8221; essentially telling his listeners heâ€™d been lying to them all year. The dittoheads didnâ€™t mind; thatâ€™s why they listen.</p>
<p>Exhibit A: If someone had taken a shotgun and blown Rushâ€™s head clean off while he was wobbling his bloated body back and forth in an inconceivably cruel mockery of Michael J. Fox, whom he accused of faking his Parkinsonâ€™s symptoms for political effect, it would have been the greatest viral video of them all.</p>
<p>Sentence: Parkinsonâ€™s disease, of course, triggered by oxycontin abuse.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118959</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4877.html#comment-118959</guid>
		<description>There is a related story on Unclaimed Territory about the extraordinary amount of nepotism in right wing &quot;intellectual&quot; circles.  See http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a related story on Unclaimed Territory about the extraordinary amount of nepotism in right wing &#8220;intellectual&#8221; circles.  See <a href="http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

