Comments on: The Social Consequences of Same-Sex Marriage

By: seks

seks — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:46:56 +0000

Didn’t the Cameron study also make some absurd claim that Lesbians were hundreds of times more likely to die in auto crashes?

By: RJLigier

RJLigier — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:39:29 +0000

The argument has never been about same sex marriage exclusively. The real argument addresses neurotic legal and medical professionals attempting to normalize neurotic behavior and its associated paraphilias by using gay marriage and civil unions as a means to knowingly place children in borderline caretaker environments, regardless of the gender of the caretaker environment or its socioeconomic status. This professional misconduct can be considered no less than unethical if not antisocial behavior by neurotic legal and medical professionals. It’s not exclusively about you, Miss Thing.

By: mbu

mbu — Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:25:51 +0000

can same sex marriage be considered as family?
why is same sex marriage controversial?
does norms, values, social functions, morality,intimacy,religion,gender, sex,family and socialisation favour same sex marriage?

By: Andie

Andie — Fri, 05 Nov 2004 19:35:07 +0000

Interesting.

By: Jim

Jim — Wed, 14 Apr 2004 01:09:59 +0000

In fact, I have been doing a lot of research into the pamphlet “Medical Consequences Of What Homosexuals Do”, and can say right now that it has been exceptionally enlightening going through all of his footnotes, pulling up the sources that he cites, and finding out what the sources *really* say. I have yet to find a single source that he has not abused, although I am only about half way done. I hope (God willing!) to have a complete point-by-point refutation of his pamphlet posted in late June.

It’s a lot of work, but I think the results will be worth it.

By: agrajag

agrajag — Mon, 29 Mar 2004 06:13:49 +0000

Really, if we’re going to tax gays the way we do smokers, we should charge by the orgasm.

We can put Santorum on monitor duty. That should give him something to do.

By: Frederick

Frederick — Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:46:08 +0000

Sounds like glenstonecottage needs a new constitutional amendment, pronto.

By: glenstonecottage

glenstonecottage — Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:12:28 +0000

People who own these so-called “exotic” pets, like iguanas and snakes, are debasing the pet ownership rights of us normal, legitimate dog, cat, goldfish and hamster owners.

These people must be STOPPED! They are HURTING me, hurting society, and making a mockery of the Bible!!! I don’t want my kids to ever see them!!! Where in the Constitution did the Founding Fathers ever say that THEY should have any ‘rights’?

BWAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH…………

By: Bill S

Bill S — Sat, 27 Mar 2004 08:06:38 +0000

Didn’t the Cameron study also make some absurd claim that Lesbians were hundreds of times more likely to die in auto crashes?

By: cooper

cooper — Sat, 27 Mar 2004 06:57:44 +0000

Interestingly enough… M-W.com tells me…

Main Entry: mar?riage
Pronunciation: ‘mer-ij, ‘ma-rij
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English mariage, from Anglo-French, from marier to marry
1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage b : the mutual relation of married persons : WEDLOCK c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2 : an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities
3 : an intimate or close union

By: Frederick

Frederick — Sat, 27 Mar 2004 06:39:31 +0000

Another horrific consequence of gay marriage: Barbie and Ken broke up their 43-year relationship just one day after gays starting getting married in San Francisco. (I assume that Ken, whose heterosexuality was always in doubt, ran off to San Francisco with his boyfriend.)

By: piotr

piotr — Sat, 27 Mar 2004 06:25:50 +0000

And what about lesbians?

They get STDs more rarely than heterosexuals. Apparently, hetero-sexual marriage is bad for the health of women (compared with same-sex marriage).

Moreover, partiarchal Bible did not care too much about what women do, it is not clear if it is sex in Biblical sense (seed is not wasted). In any case, shouldn’t Trent Lott offer his daughter for the enjoyment of his neighbors, as the pius Lot did? Or he is treating the Bible as a smorgasboard, to pick and choose?

By: JGil

JGil — Sat, 27 Mar 2004 05:53:35 +0000

For the last goddamn time, dogs are not consenting adults and can’t agree to get married. Get it, conservative idiots?

By: filbert

filbert — Sat, 27 Mar 2004 05:04:33 +0000

Ms Mastert, as always, nails the head squarely! I admire her for her use of statistics and dictionaries.

I did a little research of my own and I found that of 10,459 obituaries printed over the last 5 years in major metropolitan dailies the vast majority featured married heterosexuals. One can assume from other research into the “habits” of this group that a good portion engaged in rampant heterosexual sex as well as so called blow jobs, anal penetration, and the use of “marital aids,” self-stimulation, and even animals.

Most suprising: All were D-E-A-D. And the vast majority felt they deceased “prematurely.”

That fact proves once and for all that heterosexuals shouldn’t marry because they will die before they want to.

As a sidebar, many of these dead heteros left spouses behind and were survived by “children” and (ugh!) “grandchildren” from their “unions.”

One can only speculate as to what these offspring are now engaging in amongst themselves since they were raised with such poor moral examples. They’ll all probably die, too! Ugh!

By: BFDiehl

BFDiehl — Sat, 27 Mar 2004 02:40:06 +0000

Bill Bennett got his dick caught in a ringer..

Actually, I think it was a slot machine. But he loved every second of it.

By: Doghouse Riley

Doghouse Riley — Sat, 27 Mar 2004 02:15:19 +0000

Sheesh, they’re still quoting Cameron? Bill Bennett got his dick caught in a ringer for using that one in 1997.

By: Gail

Gail — Sat, 27 Mar 2004 00:34:52 +0000

What is wrong with a little grandma on Parrot action, Frederick? You must be open minded! After all, I understand that there is a picture of you in a compromising position with a stingray out there.

One of my favorite This American Life episodes is called 81 Words, which talks about the change in the APA from seeing Homosexuality as a mental problem to seeing it as normal. It’s well worth spending an hour listening to on the net from http://www.thislife.org

By: Frederick

Frederick — Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:08:56 +0000

Forgotten so soon, S.Z.? As I previously e-mailed you, gay marriage is already causing hitherto conservative, religious grandmas to give handjobs to parakeets: http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0411/savage.php