<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Gone Way Past &#8216;Civil Inconvenience&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo's Bike Shop</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-102468</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo's Bike Shop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 05:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-102468</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry--this software can generate em-dashes--but it can&#039;t close italics?

!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry&#8211;this software can generate em-dashes&#8211;but it can&#8217;t close italics?</p>
<p>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo's Bike Shop</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-102466</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo's Bike Shop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 05:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-102466</guid>
		<description>BenA, thanks, now I had to look it up:

&lt;i&gt;His Majesty King Abdullah II bin Al Hussein is the 43rd generation direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him).&lt;/i&gt;

Straight from the  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kingabdullah.jo/main.php?main_page=0&amp;lang_hmka1=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hussein, No!&lt;/a&gt; website.

I guess his dad was Hussein Hussein, but I&#039;m not going to look that up because I really thought I already had my fill of Hashemite trivia.

Jordan--Dang--with friends like us, who needs enemas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BenA, thanks, now I had to look it up:</p>
<p><i>His Majesty King Abdullah II bin Al Hussein is the 43rd generation direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him).</i></p>
<p>Straight from the  <a href="http://www.kingabdullah.jo/main.php?main_page=0&amp;lang_hmka1=1" rel="nofollow">Hussein, No!</a> website.</p>
<p>I guess his dad was Hussein Hussein, but I&#8217;m not going to look that up because I really thought I already had my fill of Hashemite trivia.</p>
<p>Jordan&#8211;Dang&#8211;with friends like us, who needs enemas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Watts</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101948</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101948</guid>
		<description>What if the fetus ends up causing the death of the mother but survives? Can it be tried in court for murder? Can the father be tried as an accomplice to murder because he helped create the murdering fetus?

The mind boggles. The Earth wobbles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if the fetus ends up causing the death of the mother but survives? Can it be tried in court for murder? Can the father be tried as an accomplice to murder because he helped create the murdering fetus?</p>
<p>The mind boggles. The Earth wobbles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merlallen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101933</link>
		<dc:creator>merlallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101933</guid>
		<description>ben, you are full of shit. what ss officers were fighting on for a couple of years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ben, you are full of shit. what ss officers were fighting on for a couple of years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101924</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101924</guid>
		<description>Why the fuck is it that people like Ben think that American soldiers are so much better at painting Iraqi schools than Iraqi school-maintenance-workers are?

Ben sez with heavily laden sarcasm: &quot;But, lets go ahead and bring our troops home anyway. It doesnâ€™t matter if theyâ€™re doing some good, or cleaning up after a mess we helped create.....&quot; 

 I mean, what the fuck is the &quot;all the good we&#039;re doing over there?&quot; all about? 

School painting, at best, is a photo op for the military. Kindof like having the Air Force Band play an outdoor jazz concert at the park during the summer festival. It&#039;s nice, and it&#039;s good for the Air Force&#039;s image, but it&#039;s not their real job. Their real job is, you know, flying airplanes to kill other countries&#039; soldiers, or support the killing of such by ground forces..

And Ben adds: &quot;while sustaining less casualties than we would have had in a single battle during WWII over the entire invasion....&quot;

Umm..., right, Ben.

I&#039;m curious, does anyone know? Are there statistics about the number of wounded and maimed coming home ALIVE that, under WWII or Vietnam conditions, and lacking current medical treatment, would not have survived?

It&#039;s one thing to say, Gosh, we have so few casualties, i.e., DEAD soldiers, rather than horribly maimed ones. But it seems to me that our numbers simply show us that we&#039;re a whole lot better at keeping horribly wounded people alive than we used to be. That&#039;s a comfort for some...but the statistics make it a false comparison; those who hold up the numbers as a GOOD thing are simply comparing apples to oranges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the fuck is it that people like Ben think that American soldiers are so much better at painting Iraqi schools than Iraqi school-maintenance-workers are?</p>
<p>Ben sez with heavily laden sarcasm: &#8220;But, lets go ahead and bring our troops home anyway. It doesnâ€™t matter if theyâ€™re doing some good, or cleaning up after a mess we helped create&#8230;..&#8221; </p>
<p> I mean, what the fuck is the &#8220;all the good we&#8217;re doing over there?&#8221; all about? </p>
<p>School painting, at best, is a photo op for the military. Kindof like having the Air Force Band play an outdoor jazz concert at the park during the summer festival. It&#8217;s nice, and it&#8217;s good for the Air Force&#8217;s image, but it&#8217;s not their real job. Their real job is, you know, flying airplanes to kill other countries&#8217; soldiers, or support the killing of such by ground forces..</p>
<p>And Ben adds: &#8220;while sustaining less casualties than we would have had in a single battle during WWII over the entire invasion&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Umm&#8230;, right, Ben.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious, does anyone know? Are there statistics about the number of wounded and maimed coming home ALIVE that, under WWII or Vietnam conditions, and lacking current medical treatment, would not have survived?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one thing to say, Gosh, we have so few casualties, i.e., DEAD soldiers, rather than horribly maimed ones. But it seems to me that our numbers simply show us that we&#8217;re a whole lot better at keeping horribly wounded people alive than we used to be. That&#8217;s a comfort for some&#8230;but the statistics make it a false comparison; those who hold up the numbers as a GOOD thing are simply comparing apples to oranges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ministry of Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101847</link>
		<dc:creator>Ministry of Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 05:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101847</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Hysterical Woman said,
December 1, 2006 at 2:48

So if we would try the fetuses in a court of law, abortion would be legal?&lt;/i&gt;

Would the fetus have the right to plead the Fifth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Hysterical Woman said,<br />
December 1, 2006 at 2:48</p>
<p>So if we would try the fetuses in a court of law, abortion would be legal?</i></p>
<p>Would the fetus have the right to plead the Fifth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toof Fat Elvis</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101845</link>
		<dc:creator>Toof Fat Elvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 04:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101845</guid>
		<description>Ben, I Love ya, but you&#039;re no match for Gary.  The Constitution is only concerned with government action. (the 13th Amendment aside)  This Christian nation was formed out of the idea that the greatest threat to mankind was unchecked governmental power.  They also didn&#039;t believe that life began at conception and they didn&#039;t give the government the power to do anything about it if someone got tthat crazy notion later on.  Good Christians that they were.  If you&#039;re curious you should read the opinion in a Supreme Court case called Roe v. Wade.  You have actually read the case haven&#039;t you?  We&#039;d hate to think you&#039;re wasting our time arguing about an issue for which you have no basic preparation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, I Love ya, but you&#8217;re no match for Gary.  The Constitution is only concerned with government action. (the 13th Amendment aside)  This Christian nation was formed out of the idea that the greatest threat to mankind was unchecked governmental power.  They also didn&#8217;t believe that life began at conception and they didn&#8217;t give the government the power to do anything about it if someone got tthat crazy notion later on.  Good Christians that they were.  If you&#8217;re curious you should read the opinion in a Supreme Court case called Roe v. Wade.  You have actually read the case haven&#8217;t you?  We&#8217;d hate to think you&#8217;re wasting our time arguing about an issue for which you have no basic preparation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Someone</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101816</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101816</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In fact, the 5th Amendment prohibits taking life without due process.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, so the government should stop forcing women to have all those abortions!

I love it when toddlers use big grown-up words -- like &quot;5th Amendment&quot; and &quot;due process&quot; -- when they have absolutely no idea what they&#039;re saying.  It&#039;s just so adorable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In fact, the 5th Amendment prohibits taking life without due process.</i></p>
<p>Yes, so the government should stop forcing women to have all those abortions!</p>
<p>I love it when toddlers use big grown-up words &#8212; like &#8220;5th Amendment&#8221; and &#8220;due process&#8221; &#8212; when they have absolutely no idea what they&#8217;re saying.  It&#8217;s just so adorable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101810</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101810</guid>
		<description>The tax thing always gets me.   The die hard conservatives believe that:

1.  America is the best country EVAH!
1A.  People who don&#039;t agree with 1 are free to go somewhere else.
2. The free market determines an item&#039;s value.
3. Individuals have a responsibility to pay for the things they receive (i.e. TANSTAAFL)

BUT- 

when it comes to paying for the freedom and standard of living that America provides, why, then, it&#039;s supposed to be a free fuckin ride, especially if you&#039;ve managed to milk the American system enough to make yourself wealthy.  And let&#039;s not talk about the people, like the Bushes and Cheney, who have accrued their wealth by DIRECTLT sucking on the government spigot.

I mean, come on, Gary.  If you really think you&#039;re being taxed so damn much, you can fricking take a hike. There must be plenty of countries with lower tax rates.... oh, yeah, the standard of living in those countries is abysmal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tax thing always gets me.   The die hard conservatives believe that:</p>
<p>1.  America is the best country EVAH!<br />
1A.  People who don&#8217;t agree with 1 are free to go somewhere else.<br />
2. The free market determines an item&#8217;s value.<br />
3. Individuals have a responsibility to pay for the things they receive (i.e. TANSTAAFL)</p>
<p>BUT- </p>
<p>when it comes to paying for the freedom and standard of living that America provides, why, then, it&#8217;s supposed to be a free fuckin ride, especially if you&#8217;ve managed to milk the American system enough to make yourself wealthy.  And let&#8217;s not talk about the people, like the Bushes and Cheney, who have accrued their wealth by DIRECTLT sucking on the government spigot.</p>
<p>I mean, come on, Gary.  If you really think you&#8217;re being taxed so damn much, you can fricking take a hike. There must be plenty of countries with lower tax rates&#8230;. oh, yeah, the standard of living in those countries is abysmal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101804</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101804</guid>
		<description>I think Gary Rupperturing received an upgrade over the elections.

Look!  He was responding to mikey&#039;s post!  it was an almost lifelike... well, it kind of seemed like a response.  Much improved.

I think we&#039;ve raised Gary&#039;s game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Gary Rupperturing received an upgrade over the elections.</p>
<p>Look!  He was responding to mikey&#8217;s post!  it was an almost lifelike&#8230; well, it kind of seemed like a response.  Much improved.</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;ve raised Gary&#8217;s game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AshPlant</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101803</link>
		<dc:creator>AshPlant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101803</guid>
		<description>Jillian - looks like he did answer me. It&#039;s just, the answers didn&#039;t make any &lt;b&gt;sense&lt;/b&gt;. 

I like this &#039;shorter&#039; format. Can I try?

Shorter Gary Ruppert: &quot;The 5th amendment opposes taking life without due trial. Support gun ownership!&quot;?

Ooh, and that other bit at the top: &quot;The Democrats committed massive fraud to win the election, but the Republicans didn&#039;t do anything about it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jillian &#8211; looks like he did answer me. It&#8217;s just, the answers didn&#8217;t make any <b>sense</b>. </p>
<p>I like this &#8216;shorter&#8217; format. Can I try?</p>
<p>Shorter Gary Ruppert: &#8220;The 5th amendment opposes taking life without due trial. Support gun ownership!&#8221;?</p>
<p>Ooh, and that other bit at the top: &#8220;The Democrats committed massive fraud to win the election, but the Republicans didn&#8217;t do anything about it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Keyes</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101796</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Keyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101796</guid>
		<description>Gary Manson Ruppert--or is it Gary McVeigh Ruppert?--used to turn up at Atrios telling all &amp; sundry how the Democrats were going to Bite The Big One last month. 
Havn&#039;t seen much of him since...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary Manson Ruppert&#8211;or is it Gary McVeigh Ruppert?&#8211;used to turn up at Atrios telling all &amp; sundry how the Democrats were going to Bite The Big One last month.<br />
Havn&#8217;t seen much of him since&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Roomba of Historyâ„¢</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101762</link>
		<dc:creator>the Roomba of Historyâ„¢</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 02:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101762</guid>
		<description>Gary seems to have spontaneously regenerated from particles too small to be vacuumed up on November 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary seems to have spontaneously regenerated from particles too small to be vacuumed up on November 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smiling Mortician</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101758</link>
		<dc:creator>Smiling Mortician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 02:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101758</guid>
		<description>Crikey, guys. Another banner day, and me tied up at work for most of it. I truly do miss all the fun.

This &quot;Ben&quot; is new to me and I am intrigued. I believe it is a GopBot MCA2006, an impressive feat in technology. It develops what seem to be actual &quot;arguments,&quot; in that it advances &quot;claims&quot; and follows them up with copious amounts of SynthEvidence, by and large in complete sentences and even paragraphs. However, it has some glitches, such as automatically disengaging when valid questions are introduced into its interface. 

Further, a quick glance at its &lt;a href=&quot;http://bensrants.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;warranty &lt;/a&gt;reveals the following loophole: â€œThis blog is a collection of random thoughts. I in no way take responsibility for them,â€? to which I am forced to say PFFFFFT!

And Gary. Dear, sweet Gary, posting multiple-sentence entries that still make absolutely no sense. Gary? More words just don&#039;t equate to more reasonableness. Sorry, guy. I agree with you that Obama&#039;s pretty special, but you&#039;ll never demonstrate that he (or anyone else) is objectively &quot;anti-war&quot; and &quot;anti-life.&quot; It&#039;s rather like being both &quot;anti-sex&quot; and &quot;anti-celibacy.&quot; Try plugging that into the more logically programmed BenBot and see if it fries his circuits. (Psst! Do it, Gary! Then maybe he&#039;d go away for good and you could be our bestest troll again.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crikey, guys. Another banner day, and me tied up at work for most of it. I truly do miss all the fun.</p>
<p>This &#8220;Ben&#8221; is new to me and I am intrigued. I believe it is a GopBot MCA2006, an impressive feat in technology. It develops what seem to be actual &#8220;arguments,&#8221; in that it advances &#8220;claims&#8221; and follows them up with copious amounts of SynthEvidence, by and large in complete sentences and even paragraphs. However, it has some glitches, such as automatically disengaging when valid questions are introduced into its interface. </p>
<p>Further, a quick glance at its <a href="http://bensrants.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">warranty </a>reveals the following loophole: â€œThis blog is a collection of random thoughts. I in no way take responsibility for them,â€? to which I am forced to say PFFFFFT!</p>
<p>And Gary. Dear, sweet Gary, posting multiple-sentence entries that still make absolutely no sense. Gary? More words just don&#8217;t equate to more reasonableness. Sorry, guy. I agree with you that Obama&#8217;s pretty special, but you&#8217;ll never demonstrate that he (or anyone else) is objectively &#8220;anti-war&#8221; and &#8220;anti-life.&#8221; It&#8217;s rather like being both &#8220;anti-sex&#8221; and &#8220;anti-celibacy.&#8221; Try plugging that into the more logically programmed BenBot and see if it fries his circuits. (Psst! Do it, Gary! Then maybe he&#8217;d go away for good and you could be our bestest troll again.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobW</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101737</link>
		<dc:creator>RobW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101737</guid>
		<description>(&quot;Save a prayer for the mooorning afterrrrrr.....&quot;)  Oh, did you say something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(&#8220;Save a prayer for the mooorning afterrrrrr&#8230;..&#8221;)  Oh, did you say something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobW</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101736</link>
		<dc:creator>RobW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101736</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In fact, the 5th Amendment prohibits taking life without due process.&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, it says:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

I think the key word here is &quot;person.&quot;  One has to have been born to be a person.  Unless one is a corporation, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In fact, the 5th Amendment prohibits taking life without due process.</i></p>
<p>Actually, it says:</p>
<p>No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.</p>
<p>I think the key word here is &#8220;person.&#8221;  One has to have been born to be a person.  Unless one is a corporation, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101735</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101735</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Barack is a tax hiker, thatâ€™s why heâ€™s anti-taxpayer&lt;/i&gt;

Now that&#039;s just silly.  Why would a tax hiker be anti taxpayer?  I mean, you hike taxes, you want people to pay them, right?  So wouldn&#039;t you be about the most PRO taxpayer of anyone?  It IS a mystery.

&lt;i&gt;Abortion violates the 5th Amendment people!!&lt;/i&gt;

And yet, somehow, it keeps sneaking past the supreme court - they, the arbiters of constitutionality, keep upholding it...

mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Barack is a tax hiker, thatâ€™s why heâ€™s anti-taxpayer</i></p>
<p>Now that&#8217;s just silly.  Why would a tax hiker be anti taxpayer?  I mean, you hike taxes, you want people to pay them, right?  So wouldn&#8217;t you be about the most PRO taxpayer of anyone?  It IS a mystery.</p>
<p><i>Abortion violates the 5th Amendment people!!</i></p>
<p>And yet, somehow, it keeps sneaking past the supreme court &#8211; they, the arbiters of constitutionality, keep upholding it&#8230;</p>
<p>mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101728</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101728</guid>
		<description>Or should I say, &quot;I love having Gary Drudge Ruppert around.&quot;

When it comes down to it, it&#039;s the manâ€™s name, and iâ€™m gonna use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or should I say, &#8220;I love having Gary Drudge Ruppert around.&#8221;</p>
<p>When it comes down to it, it&#8217;s the manâ€™s name, and iâ€™m gonna use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101727</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101727</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In fact, the 5th Amendment prohibits taking life without due process. Life begins at conception, and there is no due process in abortion.&lt;/i&gt;

 *wipes tears*  That is why I love having Gary around.  Abortion violates the 5th Amendment people!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In fact, the 5th Amendment prohibits taking life without due process. Life begins at conception, and there is no due process in abortion.</i></p>
<p> *wipes tears*  That is why I love having Gary around.  Abortion violates the 5th Amendment people!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101724</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4447.html#comment-101724</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Heâ€™s funny as hell, though. &lt;/i&gt;

What&#039;s hilarious is when he starts doing his Blofeld/Dr. Evil impersonation when he pontificates on the fate of the &#039;Democrat&#039; party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Heâ€™s funny as hell, though. </i></p>
<p>What&#8217;s hilarious is when he starts doing his Blofeld/Dr. Evil impersonation when he pontificates on the fate of the &#8216;Democrat&#8217; party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

