<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That Would Seem To Be A &#8216;No&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AnferTuto</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-235422</link>
		<dc:creator>AnferTuto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-235422</guid>
		<description>Hola faretaste 
mekodinosad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hola faretaste<br />
mekodinosad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That Would Seem To Be A Â‘NoÂ’ :: Newstack</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-104480</link>
		<dc:creator>That Would Seem To Be A Â‘NoÂ’ :: Newstack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-104480</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more: here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more: here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobW</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101926</link>
		<dc:creator>RobW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101926</guid>
		<description>Fun with mikey&#039;s linked story and ellipses...

Nov. 29, 2006 - A looming ... enemy combatant Jose Padilla ... is threatening to create new ... terrorism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun with mikey&#8217;s linked story and ellipses&#8230;</p>
<p>Nov. 29, 2006 &#8211; A looming &#8230; enemy combatant Jose Padilla &#8230; is threatening to create new &#8230; terrorism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobW</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101925</link>
		<dc:creator>RobW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101925</guid>
		<description>Dammit.  Twice, I&#039;ve clicked on mikey&#039;s link to MSNBC news and my browser crashed.

Now, why would a site owned by Microsoft have a problem with Firefox?  (&#039;Scuse me while I adjust my tinfoil...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dammit.  Twice, I&#8217;ve clicked on mikey&#8217;s link to MSNBC news and my browser crashed.</p>
<p>Now, why would a site owned by Microsoft have a problem with Firefox?  (&#8216;Scuse me while I adjust my tinfoil&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobW</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101923</link>
		<dc:creator>RobW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101923</guid>
		<description>Mikey:

From the story you linked...

&lt;i&gt;The prosecutors also say there is â€œnot a shred of record evidenceâ€? to back up Padillaâ€™s claims that he was tortured and asserted that the â€œconditions of his confinement were humane and designed to ensure his safety and security.â€?&lt;/i&gt;

And guess who was keeping Padilla&#039;s medical and interrogation records during his incarceration?  Seriously, what judge could possibly accept this argument?

&quot;Your honor, we have absolutely no record of us committing any crimes.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikey:</p>
<p>From the story you linked&#8230;</p>
<p><i>The prosecutors also say there is â€œnot a shred of record evidenceâ€? to back up Padillaâ€™s claims that he was tortured and asserted that the â€œconditions of his confinement were humane and designed to ensure his safety and security.â€?</i></p>
<p>And guess who was keeping Padilla&#8217;s medical and interrogation records during his incarceration?  Seriously, what judge could possibly accept this argument?</p>
<p>&#8220;Your honor, we have absolutely no record of us committing any crimes.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101815</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101815</guid>
		<description>Dan  Someone, I cannot believe that you remember that poem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan  Someone, I cannot believe that you remember that poem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Someone</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101784</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101784</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;got no reason, what the heck?&lt;/i&gt;

C-I-L-L mah landlord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>got no reason, what the heck?</i></p>
<p>C-I-L-L mah landlord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herr Doktor Bimler</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101633</link>
		<dc:creator>Herr Doktor Bimler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101633</guid>
		<description>------------- Warning -- Lack of Snark ----------------
For the artistic use of ellipses, I recommend &lt;b&gt;A Humument&lt;/b&gt;:
http://www.tomphillips.co.uk/humument/0/001010/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Warning &#8212; Lack of Snark &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
For the artistic use of ellipses, I recommend <b>A Humument</b>:<br />
<a href="http://www.tomphillips.co.uk/humument/0/001010/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomphillips.co.uk/humument/0/001010/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jâ€”</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101630</link>
		<dc:creator>Jâ€”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101630</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;That â€¦ Seem&lt;/b&gt;

Ding-ding â€¦ have a hot one.

When &#039;the sole liberal&#039; â€¦ blogs â€¦ on the Wall â€¦ , â€¦ his efforts to keep â€¦ our pal â€¦ a howling â€¦ bridge-troll â€¦ is welcome.

You could say that this â€¦ cushion â€¦include[s] â€¦ Bush â€¦ Bush â€¦ and &lt;i&gt;Bush&lt;/i&gt;.

Interestingly, â€¦ a book of â€¦ &lt;i&gt;Privacy&lt;/i&gt; â€¦ &lt;i&gt;Information&lt;/i&gt; â€¦ is in fact â€¦ [a] call â€¦ &#039;book.&#039;

I&#039;m trying to â€¦ require â€¦ dumb â€¦ numbers.

Here are â€¦ boys â€¦ with â€¦ unique â€¦ scandals.

Thank God â€¦ terrorists got â€¦ cheap.

It&#039;s a good â€¦ &lt;i&gt;pace&lt;/i&gt; â€¦ that â€¦ that insane â€¦ though indulging â€¦ tic â€¦ pass[ed].

It&#039;s â€¦ afloat on a sea of â€¦ virulating â€¦ bait â€¦ yes.

[The End]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>That â€¦ Seem</b></p>
<p>Ding-ding â€¦ have a hot one.</p>
<p>When &#8216;the sole liberal&#8217; â€¦ blogs â€¦ on the Wall â€¦ , â€¦ his efforts to keep â€¦ our pal â€¦ a howling â€¦ bridge-troll â€¦ is welcome.</p>
<p>You could say that this â€¦ cushion â€¦include[s] â€¦ Bush â€¦ Bush â€¦ and <i>Bush</i>.</p>
<p>Interestingly, â€¦ a book of â€¦ <i>Privacy</i> â€¦ <i>Information</i> â€¦ is in fact â€¦ [a] call â€¦ &#8216;book.&#8217;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to â€¦ require â€¦ dumb â€¦ numbers.</p>
<p>Here are â€¦ boys â€¦ with â€¦ unique â€¦ scandals.</p>
<p>Thank God â€¦ terrorists got â€¦ cheap.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good â€¦ <i>pace</i> â€¦ that â€¦ that insane â€¦ though indulging â€¦ tic â€¦ pass[ed].</p>
<p>It&#8217;s â€¦ afloat on a sea of â€¦ virulating â€¦ bait â€¦ yes.</p>
<p>[The End]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101549</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101549</guid>
		<description>Look, FISA is and always has been a rubber stamp.  So the only possible reason bush had for working around FISA and going without warrants in direct violation of the law and the constitution can only be that he wanted to use the NSA for his own purposes.  He wanted to wiretap political enemies, reporters and members of his own staff, and no court, not even FISA would have been willing to allow that.  Hell, even those judges can be impeached.

Me, I&#039;m much more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15958572/site/newsweek/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interested in this&lt;/a&gt;.  Sure looks to me like the government might just lose this one, and if they do, Mr. President&#039;s-above-the-law might just have to start thinking about living in exile.  Hey, maybe Idi Amin&#039;s old digs in Riyadh will be available!!

mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, FISA is and always has been a rubber stamp.  So the only possible reason bush had for working around FISA and going without warrants in direct violation of the law and the constitution can only be that he wanted to use the NSA for his own purposes.  He wanted to wiretap political enemies, reporters and members of his own staff, and no court, not even FISA would have been willing to allow that.  Hell, even those judges can be impeached.</p>
<p>Me, I&#8217;m much more <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15958572/site/newsweek/" rel="nofollow">interested in this</a>.  Sure looks to me like the government might just lose this one, and if they do, Mr. President&#8217;s-above-the-law might just have to start thinking about living in exile.  Hey, maybe Idi Amin&#8217;s old digs in Riyadh will be available!!</p>
<p>mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothy</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101526</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101526</guid>
		<description>Greenwald has it right: it&#039;s the illegality, stupid. If someone is robbing liquor stores at gunpoint, you don&#039;t pat him on the back for keeping the safety on the gun. 

&quot;Oversight board told of safety precautions

&quot;â€¦Board members said that they were impressed by the safeguards  the thief has built into his robbing of liquor stores and check-cashing fronts, and that they wished the robber could tell the public more about them to ease fear and worry.

â€œIf the American public, especially civil libertarians like myself, could be more informed about how careful this armed robber is to avoid shooting bystanders while still stealking from brown people, weâ€™d be more reassured,â€? said Lanny Davis, a former Clinton White House lawyer who is the boardâ€™s lone liberal Democrat.&quot;

Hey, no harm, no foul, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greenwald has it right: it&#8217;s the illegality, stupid. If someone is robbing liquor stores at gunpoint, you don&#8217;t pat him on the back for keeping the safety on the gun. </p>
<p>&#8220;Oversight board told of safety precautions</p>
<p>&#8220;â€¦Board members said that they were impressed by the safeguards  the thief has built into his robbing of liquor stores and check-cashing fronts, and that they wished the robber could tell the public more about them to ease fear and worry.</p>
<p>â€œIf the American public, especially civil libertarians like myself, could be more informed about how careful this armed robber is to avoid shooting bystanders while still stealking from brown people, weâ€™d be more reassured,â€? said Lanny Davis, a former Clinton White House lawyer who is the boardâ€™s lone liberal Democrat.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey, no harm, no foul, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinister eyebrow</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101446</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinister eyebrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101446</guid>
		<description>Glenn Greenwald summed it up pretty nicely when he pointed out that it is totally irrelevant whether Bush broke the law in a careful manner.  It&#039;s the fact that he broke the law, repeatedly, blatantly and it&#039;s a freakin&#039; felony for God&#039;s sake.

Lanny Davis&#039;s statement is pretty close to &quot;Well, I was impressed that while my house was burglarized last night, the burglars were very careful not to break anything or make too much of a mess of the drawers and closets.&quot;

Bush, the gentleman bandit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Greenwald summed it up pretty nicely when he pointed out that it is totally irrelevant whether Bush broke the law in a careful manner.  It&#8217;s the fact that he broke the law, repeatedly, blatantly and it&#8217;s a freakin&#8217; felony for God&#8217;s sake.</p>
<p>Lanny Davis&#8217;s statement is pretty close to &#8220;Well, I was impressed that while my house was burglarized last night, the burglars were very careful not to break anything or make too much of a mess of the drawers and closets.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bush, the gentleman bandit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smiling Mortician</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101434</link>
		<dc:creator>Smiling Mortician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101434</guid>
		<description>Well, I dunno, Hate Encrusted Eyes, I&#039;m thinking if we&#039;re going to start suing people for crass incompetence, stupidity and mendacity, Solomon&#039;s gonna have to go to the end of a pretty long line. OK, maybe not the very end of the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I dunno, Hate Encrusted Eyes, I&#8217;m thinking if we&#8217;re going to start suing people for crass incompetence, stupidity and mendacity, Solomon&#8217;s gonna have to go to the end of a pretty long line. OK, maybe not the very end of the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cpl. Chron</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101426</link>
		<dc:creator>Cpl. Chron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101426</guid>
		<description>So wait, it took the NSA over a year to cook up the story they were going to tell a Boosh appointed board chosen, more than likely, for their hostility toward civil liberties.  That would be pretty suspicious if it hadn&#039;t already passed the rigorous Mark Noonan Test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So wait, it took the NSA over a year to cook up the story they were going to tell a Boosh appointed board chosen, more than likely, for their hostility toward civil liberties.  That would be pretty suspicious if it hadn&#8217;t already passed the rigorous Mark Noonan Test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hate Encrusted Eyes</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101401</link>
		<dc:creator>Hate Encrusted Eyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101401</guid>
		<description>Can we launch a civil suit against Solomon?
I donno, for crass incompetence stupidity and mendacity?
He&#039;s a GOP worm in the heart of the APpple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we launch a civil suit against Solomon?<br />
I donno, for crass incompetence stupidity and mendacity?<br />
He&#8217;s a GOP worm in the heart of the APpple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101398</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101398</guid>
		<description>&quot;Then he did perfectly acceptable things like stealing the presidency, taking a vacation while his advisors were trying to warn him about 9/11, starting an illegal war, and destroying Americaâ€™s burgeoning jobs situation, etc. &quot;

Oh, I am so with you. If anyone BUT Bush had done these things I would totally have supported him. But.....I guess I just hate Bush.

[um...sarcasm indicator, for those who may be sarcasm-impaired]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Then he did perfectly acceptable things like stealing the presidency, taking a vacation while his advisors were trying to warn him about 9/11, starting an illegal war, and destroying Americaâ€™s burgeoning jobs situation, etc. &#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, I am so with you. If anyone BUT Bush had done these things I would totally have supported him. But&#8230;..I guess I just hate Bush.</p>
<p>[um...sarcasm indicator, for those who may be sarcasm-impaired]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101386</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101386</guid>
		<description>You (or rather, the BFB) left the byline off of the story.  It&#039;s John Solomon of the AP.

Because as I was reading the item (with and without the ellipses) the same question kept popping up -- What idiot reporter is gullible enough to write this?

Lanny Davis is a liberal Democrat?  Alan Raul, impressed with civil liberties protections?  &quot;[T]hey wished the administration could tell the public more about them [the safeguards] to ease distrust.&quot;  What&#039;s next -- low, low prices on the Brooklyn Bridge?

The way this reporter typed up without question the words of a Bush Administration board reminded me of this reporter who uncritically repeated baseless charges lodged against Harry Reid, the next Senate Majority Leader.  Apparently that reporter was well known as a soft touch, eager for headlines and not too interested in researching the facts.  Sure enough, when I Googled John Solomon, up came the Reid stories, like this from October: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/10/11/175829/67

&quot;Oversight board told of privacy protections.&quot;  A stenographic scoop like this isn&#039;t surprising.  It&#039;s simply more of Solomon&#039;s wisdom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You (or rather, the BFB) left the byline off of the story.  It&#8217;s John Solomon of the AP.</p>
<p>Because as I was reading the item (with and without the ellipses) the same question kept popping up &#8212; What idiot reporter is gullible enough to write this?</p>
<p>Lanny Davis is a liberal Democrat?  Alan Raul, impressed with civil liberties protections?  &#8220;[T]hey wished the administration could tell the public more about them [the safeguards] to ease distrust.&#8221;  What&#8217;s next &#8212; low, low prices on the Brooklyn Bridge?</p>
<p>The way this reporter typed up without question the words of a Bush Administration board reminded me of this reporter who uncritically repeated baseless charges lodged against Harry Reid, the next Senate Majority Leader.  Apparently that reporter was well known as a soft touch, eager for headlines and not too interested in researching the facts.  Sure enough, when I Googled John Solomon, up came the Reid stories, like this from October: <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/10/11/175829/67" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/10/11/175829/67</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Oversight board told of privacy protections.&#8221;  A stenographic scoop like this isn&#8217;t surprising.  It&#8217;s simply more of Solomon&#8217;s wisdom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay B.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101385</guid>
		<description>The Right has an....argument regarding this...committee&#039;s findings.


Original Statment: The Right has an ill-considered, entirely ridiculous, assinine argument regarding this establishment-ridden, hack-filled committee&#039;s findings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Right has an&#8230;.argument regarding this&#8230;committee&#8217;s findings.</p>
<p>Original Statment: The Right has an ill-considered, entirely ridiculous, assinine argument regarding this establishment-ridden, hack-filled committee&#8217;s findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notorious P.A.T.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101358</link>
		<dc:creator>Notorious P.A.T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101358</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;is that they are afloat on a sea of hatred, and thus anything done by the Bush Administration is immediately considered evil &lt;/i&gt;

My personal favorite Republican meme.  Yep, right around November 2000 I simply decided to start hating George W Bush--got no reason, what the heck?  Then he did perfectly acceptable things like stealing the presidency, taking a vacation while his advisors were trying to warn him about 9/11, starting an illegal war, and destroying America&#039;s burgeoning jobs situation, etc. and it gave me even more opportunities to hate him.  For no reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>is that they are afloat on a sea of hatred, and thus anything done by the Bush Administration is immediately considered evil </i></p>
<p>My personal favorite Republican meme.  Yep, right around November 2000 I simply decided to start hating George W Bush&#8211;got no reason, what the heck?  Then he did perfectly acceptable things like stealing the presidency, taking a vacation while his advisors were trying to warn him about 9/11, starting an illegal war, and destroying America&#8217;s burgeoning jobs situation, etc. and it gave me even more opportunities to hate him.  For no reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William K. Wolfrum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bush&#8217;s eavesdropping program &#8220;impressive&#8221; and no threat, say Bush&#8217;s best friends</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html/comment-page-1#comment-101357</link>
		<dc:creator>William K. Wolfrum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bush&#8217;s eavesdropping program &#8220;impressive&#8221; and no threat, say Bush&#8217;s best friends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4435.html#comment-101357</guid>
		<description>[...] Gavin at Sadly, No and Glenn Greenwald at Unclaimed Territory tear it all to shreds quite nicely, however. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gavin at Sadly, No and Glenn Greenwald at Unclaimed Territory tear it all to shreds quite nicely, however. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
