« The World Waits Rapt
Oh Yay! »

Nov
28

Why Do All These Anti-Homosexual Groups Keep Sucking Our Cock?




Posted at 1:18 by Gavin M.

Spotted at Americans for Truth, the big Christian anti-gay organization:

Pro-Homosexuality Blogs

* Andrew Sullivan
* Evil Gay Lawyer
* Ex-Gay Watch
* Faggoty-Ass Faggot
* Good As You
* Joe Brummer
* News Fit to Post
* Pam’s House Blend
* Queer Today
* Queerty
* Quench Zine
* Sadly No
* Skinny Little Faggot
* The Angry Fag

I wonder what could have chapped their fanny?

peter-labarbera-3.jpg
Above: AfT President Peter ‘Hair-Weave Barbie’ LaBarbera

Update: Continuing his program of just-in-time humor delivery, here comes Ace — the Web’s most ardent pointer-outer of alleged liberal misdeeds which ‘the left’ must scramble to repudiate:

Sullivan Continues Anti-Mormon Crusade
—Ace

[...]

I’m just curious — what would Andrew Sullivan’s response be if, say, I decided to begin posting derogatory post after derogatory post about gay “culture” and gays generally? What if every fifth post was a link to some story about a crime committed by a gay pedophile and the like? What if traced every single social or political ill to the “homosexualists” (which is, to cover my ass regarding the gay-bashing claim, not homosexuality per se, but the militant perversion of homosexuality into a political doctrine)?

How would his own tactics, used against him, look then?

Indeed. Because, you know, Americans for Truth is just some foundation-funded lobbying thing. Real right-wingers like Ace and his pals would never indulge in such unacceptable behavior.
 

[Hanx! Clif]

118 Comments »

  1. Pinko Punko said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:21

    HAHAHAHA- now, time for my rub down with oil. Snails and oysters, baby!

  2. Jillian said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:23

    Gavin said “chaps”.

    He’s totally gay.

    Totally.

  3. Jay C. said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:24

    Perhaps the redesign was more fabulous than anyone could have anticipated.

  4. mikey said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:25

    Judging by the other blogs on that list, I think you need to change the name to Sadly, No Breeders Allowed….

    mikey

  5. William K. Wolfrum said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:40

    I’ll tell you what, I’ll suck a dick right now to get included on that list.

    –WKW

  6. William K. Wolfrum said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:45

    Take Two:

    Faggoty-Ass Faggot is a gay-friendly blog? Damn.

    –WKW

  7. Kathleen said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:47

    Awe. Some.

    I think we need to consider a name revision.

    Sadly, Queer! it is.

  8. Jillian said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:49

    Queerly, No! ?

    Queerly, Non! ?

  9. J— said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:50

    I think Ace is itching to get added to Americans for Truth’s catalog of Pro-Truth Resources.

  10. D. Sidhe said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:51

    I knew there was a reason I liked it here.

  11. Pinko Punko said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:52

    Queerly, Oui!

    Hey, did Gavmo just post about Ace without improving Ace’s logo???

    I HTHINK THE INTERNETS ARE BROKEN

  12. William K. Wolfrum said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:52

    Name Revision idea:

    Ted Haggard, No!

    –WKW

  13. His Grace said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:53

    I am assuming that this site is now considered one of the leading proponents of the homosexual agenda… Um, could someone please explain (in as menacing tones as possible) what exactly that is? I’ve never quite understood it, or why it is necessary to put as many scare quotes as possible in front of it.

  14. TC said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:54

    Sadly, Snap!

  15. DocAmazing said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:55

    …not that there’s anything wrong with that…

  16. TC said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:56

    (in menacing tones) The Homosexual Agenda:

    we’re in ur town sucking ur cox!

  17. Jillian said,

    November 28, 2006 at 1:57

    Here, revealed in all its gruesome detail, is The Homosexual Agenda.

    Be forewarned, however…..those of us in the Homintern will have to kill you if you read that link. You’re either with us, or you’re against us.

  18. mikey said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:01

    Alright, His Grace, I’m going to ’splain it to you one more time. Now pay attention. The homosexual agenda is to expand their ranks. Since they cannot biologically create gay-bees, they must recruit from outside their ranks. Kind of like the NBA in Europe. So, they use the most insidious of techniques. First they make homosexuality look fun, exciting, hip and cool. Like cigarettes, first the cool kids try it, then pretty soon everybody’s doing it. Like white suburban kids dressing like urban gangsta rappahs. Of course, it being the hot sweaty man-secks, it’s entirely addictive. Like the old saying, it’s so good, don’t even try it once. So they use the avenues of pop culture, music and celebrity to spread teh ghey, and soon, if they are successful, the whole world will be one pulsating, throbbing purple – er – population. And then they win!

    mikey

  19. Smiling Mortician said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:11

    Go ahead and kill me, Jillian. It was worth it.

    Has no one yet suggested: Fagly, go!

  20. pessullivan said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:14

    For a straight man he sure does surf a lot of gay sites. I know it’s all in the name of research ;-)

  21. His Grace said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:15

    See, I had a conversation about gay marriage once with a conservative Christian (back when it was legal in my province but not in 5% of the country). Anyways he at one point accused me of enabling the homosexual agenda, since I didn’t follow Leviticus literally (and neither did he since he was not calling for a mass deportation of homosexuals (the current nicer rewrite translation of the bible) or their mass execution (ah the good old days of Christianity)). He said it with such authority and conviction but when I pressed him on it, he couldn’t really be specific but alluded to gays having a sort of super power that could turn anyone else gay and that power would be used to destroy the country.

    Now that I see that my doubts on the matter clouded me from seeing clearly. If only I had believed in that man…

  22. Jillian said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:16

    Mort, if you make out with a really cute guy, we’ll think about letting you off the hook. But only if we get pics.

    Betty Bowers is the bestest Christian ever.

  23. J— said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:19

    Curious about the Homosexual Agenda? Want to know about it but don’t know where to look? Well, today’s your lucky day. Americans for Truth’s videos “The Gay Agenda” and the “The Gay Agenda in the Public Schools” have all the answers. Buy them as a set for the low, low price of $20.00.

  24. Jillian said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:20

    Follow Leviticus literally, HG?

    You mean, like no elastic in your underwear? No men with undescended testicles in the priesthood? No eating four legged insects? No cutting the hair at the corners of your head? No eating shrimp? Or bacon-wrapped shrimp? Or those yummy grilled shrimp wrapped in bacon with the little slivers of cheese under the bacon – which is just the most awesome little canape?

  25. Shoelimpyâ„¢ said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:24

    * Skinny Little Faggot

    Is that Pinko Punko’s blog?

  26. Shoelimpyâ„¢ said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:24

    How did they pick up on Sadly No but miss a blog like Pandagon?

  27. mikey said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:34

    Jeezus, Jillian, I had no idea Leviticus was objectively anti-canape. That all by itself justifies my atheism. Yay! I’m going home right now to make some of those shrimp/bacon/cheese thingies on a toothpick with a light lime/garlic/ginger/cayenne glaze. Yum…

    mikey

  28. annieangel said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:36

    I think they confused the lame kind of gay with the homosexual kind of gay.

  29. steve_e said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:36

    Ack! I’m a gay now.

    Americans forgoing Truth should have warned me earlier.

  30. Kathleen said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:38

    Red Leader:
    STAY ON TARGET

    STAY ON TARGET

    Don’t go into the light people.

  31. Kathleen said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:39

    Andrew Sadlyvan? anyone?

  32. Jillian said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:45

    Well, I’ve taken to calling Niall Ferguson “Nialyard Kiplingson”, Kathleen, but that’s just an incredibly lameass geekgirl joke that no one must ever laugh at, because you’ll just encourage me if you do. I wouldn’t even have posted it if I weren’t as tired as I am right now.

    And mikey, you have to stop teasing me with the yummy food. I love to cook, but it’s just me, so I almost never do it. Although I did make scrambled eggs with feta, basil, a touch of sundried tomato and white pepper for dinner tonight.

  33. Pinko Punko said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:46

    How many corners does my head have?

    Nothing is more or less gay than Three Bulls. We cover the entire continuum of gay/ungay. And we smell like Ben-Gay.

  34. Ted said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:51

    Pattycakes Patterico had S,N! pegged a while back. I recalled a comment of his somewhere where he renamed S,N! to “Sadly, Penis-Obsessed!“

  35. Shoelimpyâ„¢ said,

    November 28, 2006 at 3:00

    Your face is one corner of your four corner head, Punko. And its a very gay corner.

  36. Pinko Punko said,

    November 28, 2006 at 3:04

    Happily, I read certain comments with a Thesaurus, thus I control the discourse with my mind.

    I really don’t think my head has corners.

    Check it before you wreck it!

  37. mdhatter said,

    November 28, 2006 at 3:16

    Kathleen: Sodom, No!

  38. mdhatter said,

    November 28, 2006 at 3:17

    Actually, Jillian!

  39. mikey said,

    November 28, 2006 at 3:21

    Thats funny, Jillian. I love to cook, but I only cook alone. Anybody else shows up, they get to cook or we’re going out. But when it’s just me (quite often, I live alone) I cook up a storm. No tellin, huh?

    mikey

  40. g said,

    November 28, 2006 at 3:28

    “if they are successful, the whole world will be one pulsating, throbbing purple – er – population….”

    But much more tasteful.

  41. FlipYrWhig said,

    November 28, 2006 at 3:29

    Sadly, Hey-ey!

  42. His Grace said,

    November 28, 2006 at 3:30

    Jillian: Leviticus has a heck of a lot of strange things in it that nobody, not even the most observant Jew or Christian follow any more (yet some are strangely still relevant but you can’t dare interpret them differently that’s smörgÃ¥sbord Christianity) Yes I am engaging in grave understatement.

    But if you really want to see warped fundy logic in action check this link out. I learned that incest was OK at some point, until God change her mind said stop before our DNA got all corrupted. Messed doesn’t begin to describe it.

  43. His Grace said,

    November 28, 2006 at 3:34

    argh…
    sorry forgot the end quotes in the darn html.
    here

    I still maintain that the preview button has been detained without a warrant to ensure the survival of freedom.

  44. Woodrowfan said,

    November 28, 2006 at 3:35

    that explains why this place is decorated so nicely. And I wondered about all the Broadway show tunes on the speakers…

  45. jeff said,

    November 28, 2006 at 3:41

    vuz alladiz abouz? hold on [get your cock outa my mouf!]

    Sorry, what’s all this about? I can’t even tell, other than the gay.

  46. RobW said,

    November 28, 2006 at 3:54

    Sadly, blow!

    For more on Leviticus:
    http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/

  47. Lesley said,

    November 28, 2006 at 4:09

    A carrot top hair weave? These guys need a Queer Eye for the Right Guy show.

  48. Various scallops and oysters said,

    November 28, 2006 at 4:14

    Why does Leviticus hate me???

  49. Kathleen said,

    November 28, 2006 at 4:15

    so far I think the winners are Queerly,Non! and Sodom, No!

  50. g said,

    November 28, 2006 at 4:22

    I like “Sodom, No!”

  51. His Grace said,

    November 28, 2006 at 4:29

    Well various shrimp and oysters, if I had to guess, I’d say it is because you live a sinful lifestyle. Repent and be reborn as not-shrimp or not-oysters. Perhaps you’ll be so lucky as to be reborn as a zygote or a woman in a persistent vegetative state, so that our pious elect can sanctimoniously pontificate on your behalf while accusing all others who disagree as (at best) heretics.

  52. ifthethunderdontgetya said,

    November 28, 2006 at 4:35

    I’m going to guess that Penis laBarbie has been unable to work out certain issues his entire life.

  53. Clint said,

    November 28, 2006 at 4:43

    How about “Gaily So!”

    Meh, don’t mind me, I’ll just be over here in the corner nursing a Mai Tai.

  54. Herr Doktor Bimler said,

    November 28, 2006 at 4:49

    I wouldn’t be surprised if Leviticus also rules out mixing barley and wheat in the same beer — i.e. no Weissbier. Yahweh was weird like that.
    Hmmm, Dunkelweiss.

  55. Captain Von Trapp said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:08

    Hmmm, Dunkelweiss.

    Although I really hated being a part of that homosexual-agenda-promoting movie, I certainly loved singing that song. So beautiful, so sad, so nostalgically yet understatedly show-tuney. Wait — that doesn’t make me gay, does it?

    Oh, edelweiss. Cut me some slack. I’m really old.

  56. J— said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:09

    Sadly, No!: As abominable to the Lord as eating things that crawl on their belly, making your daughter a harlot, or falsifying measures of length, weight, or capacity.

  57. Retardo Montalban said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:15

    I wonder what Space Ace thinks of this:

    HH: And so, what do you think of Harry Reid?

    CH: Oh, God. I mean, I just don’t…where do we find such men?

    HH: (laughing)

    CH: A Mormon mediocrity, and extraordinary, sort of reactionary, nullity.

    HH: Now isn’t that bigoted to say a Mormon mediocrity, Christopher Hitchens?

    CH: No, no. I’m always in favor of pointing out which cult people belong to.

    HH: You see, I think that is very, very harsh and offensive, but I will allow the Mormon listeners to call you on that.

    CH: No, he’s a Smithite, for Heaven’s sake. I mean, he believes that some idiot found gold plates buried in the ground.

    HH: But it is religious bigotry to call that out. And do you make similar comments…

    CH: No, it’s not me who says he’s a Mormon. Excuse me, it’s he who says it.

    HH: I know that, but I still think…

    CH: I say that anyone who believes that stuff is an idiot.

    HH: I know you believe that, but isn’t it sort of randomly bigoted to bring that out and throw it onto the table?

    CH: Not at all, no. It’s essential to point out…

    HH: I disagree.

  58. Pinko Punko said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:19

    Hitchens is such a chunderloaf. He deserves to spend eternity in Momo heaven with HH on that radio show.

  59. mikey said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:28

    Um, golden plates? I’m pretty sure it IS essential to point that out…

    mikey

  60. EdsAppliance said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:29

    Cheeseburgers are an abomination unto the Lord.

    Go figure.

  61. ifthethunderdontgetya said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:34

    Do golden plates keep you from getting speeding tickets? I just got one for going 81 (reduced to 79 by alleged benevolent West Virginia State Trooper). In a 70 mph area (funny, they call the highway 68).

    One hundred 70 dollars and fifty cent. Damn, I coulda gone 86 and it would have been 175.50. Or 91 and it woulda been 180.50. That’s fukked up.

    Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!1one!!

  62. islmfaoscist said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:38

    It’s the same scaredy-pants reaction they have to terr’ists.

    If being gay was truly a “lifestyle choice”, the fighting American response to threat of the gay agenda would be to form secret counter-homosexual strike teams of devastatingly attractive heterosexual espionage agents to seduce gay members of the opposite sex thereby convincing them to “change teams.”

    But, whimpering about it and hiding under the bed comes more naturally I suppose.

    Thadly, No! perhaps?

  63. mikey said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:42

    Thunder, relax, you’re good. I paid substantially more than that for an illegal left turn in McCarthy Square. You did fine. I got screwed…

    mikey

  64. Righteous Bubba said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:43

    Thadly, Uh-uh!

  65. Righteous Bubba said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:45

    I thwear I hadn’t theen Ithlamofathththiththt’th contributhion before I pothted.

  66. a different brad said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:46

    my fav bit of leviticus is good ole 19:19. Don’t sow two different kinds of seed in the same field, don’t interbreed livestock (no mules), and don’t wear clothes made of two different kinds of thread.
    Polyblend sweaters are as big a sin as sucking another guy’s dick.

  67. islmfaoscist said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:47

    Jinx, Bubba Thithter! You owe me a coke.

  68. William K. Wolfrum » Blog Archive » Christopher Hitchens: “Anyone who believes that stuff is an idiot” said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:49

    [...] In a meeting of the minds that didn’t take up all that much room, Hugh Hewitt was interviewing Christopher Hitchens and Hitchens went off on Harry Reid being Mormon: CH: No, he’s a Smithite, for Heaven’s sake. I mean, he believes that some idiot found gold plates buried in the ground. HH: But it is religious bigotry to call that out. And do you make similar comments… CH: No, it’s not me who says he’s a Mormon. Excuse me, it’s he who says it. [...]

  69. Mary Jones said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:50

    I always loved the prohibition against any emission of semen: ‘If any man has an emission of semen, then he shall wash all his body in water, and be unclean until evening. And any garment and any leather on which there is semen, it shall be washed with water, and be unclean until evening. Also, when a woman lies with a man, and there is an emission of semen, they shall bathe in water, and be unclean until evening.’ (lev.15.16-18)

    And they say the bible isn’t anti-sex…

  70. Notorious P.A.T. said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:52

    My blog is pro-homosexuality, but do I get mentioned? Sadly, no [pouts]

    PS, I just read maybe the funnies f**king story ever (apologies to Doug Feith):

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wn_report/story/474889p-399492c.html

  71. islmfaoscist said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:52

    Curiously, while ass, ox and wife-coveting are expressly proscribed, cock- and pussy-coveting escape mention entirely.

    10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbor’s.

  72. Mary Jones said,

    November 28, 2006 at 5:53

    PS, I just read maybe the funnies f**king story ever

    Well, at least we know one book that’s gonna be in the library.

  73. ifthethunderdontgetya said,

    November 28, 2006 at 6:02

    Mikey, it’s just so weird that anything over the speed limit is 170 bucks (and fifty cent), and substantially faster is five bucks more. And substantially faster than that? Five bucks more.

    It’s a place outside Morgantown, I don’t know if all West Virginia is the same. But the system is clearly designed to bring the bucks in (and in the darkness, bind them).

    I CAN’T DRIVE….65!!!!!!!!!!!!!one1!

  74. EdsAppliance said,

    November 28, 2006 at 6:02

    …when a woman lies with a man, and there is an emission of semen, they shall bathe in water, and be unclean until evening.

    Oh yeah.

  75. islmfaoscist said,

    November 28, 2006 at 6:03

    Hah! They haven’t even finalized a site, but they’ve already started on the symbolism.

    The plaintiffs, Gary Vodicka and Robert Tafel, sued SMU a year ago, alleging that the university used fraud and intimidation to oust condo residents so it could use the land for the George W. Bush Presidential Library, if SMU is named as the site.

    Yep, legacy secured.

  76. Righteous Bubba said,

    November 28, 2006 at 6:08

    Also, when a woman lies with a man, and there is an emission of semen, they shall bathe in water, and be unclean until evening.’

    And when there isn’t an emission there will be sullen football watching and quiet weeping.

  77. EdsAppliance said,

    November 28, 2006 at 6:11

    And there is always the outside chance of the second coming.

  78. TC said,

    November 28, 2006 at 6:15

    Ahem.

    “Gay Gavin, Gay Seb, Gay Brad and Faggot-Tardo’s Gay House of Faggoty faggery and Totally Gay HomoNups, Phaggy Photoshop Phakery, And Pole Smoking Snarketeria”

    Plus Kitties

  79. Some Guy said,

    November 28, 2006 at 6:17

    You could always change it to “Nuh-UH, Boyfriend!”

    http://confederateyankee.mu.nu/archives/206532.php Mr. Intellect spots a plum, calls foul.
    How obsessed with the man do you have to be to even SEE that? That’s right up there with the Virgin Mary in a rotten tree stump.

  80. Righteous Bubba said,

    November 28, 2006 at 6:25

    “Gay Gavin, Gay Seb, Gay Brad and Faggot-Tardo’s Gay House of Faggoty faggery and Totally Gay HomoNups, Phaggy Photoshop Phakery, And Pole Smoking Snarketeria�

    I see your “pole-smoking” and raise you a “knob-gobbling”.

  81. Herr Doktor Bimler said,

    November 28, 2006 at 6:25

    And when there isn’t an emission there will be sullen football watching and quiet weeping.
    [Snorts beer on the monitor. At least, I hope it's beer. Made from only one kind of grain]

  82. g said,

    November 28, 2006 at 6:49

    “And any garment and any leather on which there is semen, it shall be washed with water, and be unclean until evening”

    Umm, what do they say about bed linens? Because I am really big on wanting to have clean bed linens.

  83. g said,

    November 28, 2006 at 6:50

    On re-reading — “leather”??? LEATHER??????

    Oh. my. god.

  84. D. Sidhe said,

    November 28, 2006 at 6:51

    Sadly, No!: As abominable to the Lord as eating things that crawl on their belly, making your daughter a harlot, or falsifying measures of length, weight, or capacity.

    I’m pretty sure they’ve got at least Seb on that last count, if certain rumors were to be believed. Which might be how we got here in the first place…

  85. Major Woody said,

    November 28, 2006 at 7:01

    Why does Ace mention, in a discussion about those gays, that he feels the need to “cover his ass”? Dr. Freud, paging Dr. Freud!

  86. TC said,

    November 28, 2006 at 7:07

    Righteous Bubba, you are absolutely right.

    I needed to add a ‘knob gobbler’ in there somewhere.

  87. Gentlewoman said,

    November 28, 2006 at 7:11

    Wow, congratulations, Sadly, No! guys! It’s almost like getting on the Axis of Evil list, isn’t it?

    Count me as another vote for Sodom, No! as your new gayblogname.

    Let me take you to a gay blog–gay blog!

    And, may I just say that there is NO ONE in the world who screams ‘closeted-gay’ to me as much as Peter LaBarbera?

    The dude makes Ken Mehlman and Ted Haggard look heterosexual. Well, OK, not really. But you know what I mean.

  88. Wet Cat Food said,

    November 28, 2006 at 7:22

    Thadly, Uh Un

    Is my super fave.

  89. RobW said,

    November 28, 2006 at 7:25

    Why does Ace mention, in a discussion about those gays, that he feels the need to “cover his ass�? Dr. Freud, paging Dr. Freud!

    What? Has he no mention of the gay agenda being stuck in his face or shoved down his throat?

  90. RobW said,

    November 28, 2006 at 7:28

    Mary Jones said,
    November 28, 2006 at 5:50

    I always loved the prohibition against any emission of semen: ‘If any man has an emission of semen, then he shall wash all his body in water, and be unclean until evening. And any garment and any leather on which there is semen, it shall be washed with water, and be unclean until evening. Also, when a woman lies with a man, and there is an emission of semen, they shall bathe in water, and be unclean until evening.’ (lev.15.16-18)

    Oh jeebus. And to think I used to be an emissions inspector! In the unholy state of Nevada! I am so going to hell…

  91. RobW said,

    November 28, 2006 at 7:29

    Oops

  92. RobW said,

    November 28, 2006 at 7:29

    Did that fix it?

  93. ifthethunderdontgetya said,

    November 28, 2006 at 7:37

    Yes, RobW. But you’re still going to hell.

  94. RobW said,

    November 28, 2006 at 8:03

    Just as well. All my friends will be there.

  95. RobW said,

    November 28, 2006 at 8:07

    ittdgy:

    That video fucking rocks! Thanks!

  96. Gentlewoman said,

    November 28, 2006 at 8:15

    Iffy, that was even better than the KITTENS video of that song!

  97. g said,

    November 28, 2006 at 8:42

    It’s my birthday. I’ve been listening to music.

    Sweeney Todd — “It’s man devouring man, my dear, then who are we to deny it in here? – these are desparate times, Mrs. Lovett, and desparate measures are called for..here we are…hot from the oven…..Sniffffffff…..what is that?….. It’s priest. Try a little priest. – Is it really good? – Sir, it’s too good at least. – then again they don’t come with sins of the flesh, so it’s pretty fresh.,,,,Awfull lot of fat….Only where it sat….haven’t you got poet or something like that?” —- Sondheim

    Oh, dear. It’s time to go to bed. Otherwise I will break out the Brazil 66 CDs and get really crazy.

    “Chave chuba…lonely is the rain……!

  98. g said,

    November 28, 2006 at 8:44

    Sor-ree! it’s officially “Chove Chuva.” Whatever.

  99. Anne Laurie said,

    November 28, 2006 at 9:11

    Well, looking at Peter LaBarbera’s hair, it’s a little easier to understand why some Repubs think Willard Romney looks “presidential”. If that was the best I could manage, I’d be envious of the follicularly gifted too. But is it actually a party requirement that Peter, Mitt, Delay, Friedman, and all their ilk wear the same blank stare and shit-eating grin 24/7?

  100. Some Guy said,

    November 28, 2006 at 9:29

    He looks like a vapid, Republican version of Dean.

  101. celticgirl said,

    November 28, 2006 at 9:40

    Kathleen said,

    November 28, 2006 at 2:38

    Red Leader:
    STAY ON TARGET

    STAY ON TARGET

    Don’t go into the light people.
    ——————————————————–
    Kathleen, you RAWK!

    How about “Happily, Yeth!” or “Sadly, See You In Hell!”?

  102. mmm...lemonheads said,

    November 28, 2006 at 10:14

    I prefer “Sadly, this room is all wrong. The couch should be over there, and don’t get me started on those drapes…”

  103. mdhatter said,

    November 28, 2006 at 12:47

    Call it whatever you like, as long as that hottie Seb stops by occasionally.

  104. Res Publica said,

    November 28, 2006 at 16:04

    My proposed name change: “Whatever, bitches!”. Or maybe “Uh un, Girl!”

    Anyway, this post is the best thing I’ve ever read first thing in the morning. I’m only bitter that my actually-gay (but pretty lame) blog didn’t make their list.

  105. Smiling Mortician said,

    November 28, 2006 at 17:48

    Hey, g — I’m a little late, but happy birthday.

  106. Dan Someone said,

    November 28, 2006 at 19:05

    Wouldn’t “Sodom, No” be the opposite message from what this bog should be promoting? I would think “Sodom, Yo!” would be more appropriate.

  107. Spirula said,

    November 28, 2006 at 19:56

    Fabulously No!

    Asspoundinly No!

    And how did they miss Pandagon?

    Fortunately for them, Leviticus provides no regulations related to “unclean” keyboards or they would only get 3 minutes of typing in a day.

  108. reverter said,

    November 28, 2006 at 20:00

    Wholly, ‘mo?
    Holy, mo?
    Wholey Homo?
    Yo, homo?
    Yo ho ho for an oreo?

  109. RobW said,

    November 28, 2006 at 20:22

    Fortunately for them, Leviticus provides no regulations related to “unclean� keyboards or they would only get 3 minutes of typing in a day.

    Well, have you ever tried to rinse your keyboard with water?

  110. stinkfinger said,

    November 28, 2006 at 21:01

    The only way I’ll give up my pink underwear is when you pry them from my dead cold fingers. Watch your ass Charleton. You’ve been warned.

  111. TC said,

    November 28, 2006 at 21:24

    Before USB (back in the Dim, Dark Days of System 7 [shudder]) Mac keyboards could be cleaned in the dishwasher.

    And what’s with the bold? I though Italics were the S,N! thing?

  112. Gory Rupert said,

    November 28, 2006 at 22:22

    Let me take you to a gay blog–gay blog!

    STOP! … Continue!

    mmm, Electric Six makes you stupid and cool at the same time.

  113. Kyso K said,

    November 29, 2006 at 3:28

    This has to have been commented about 100 times already, but Faggoty-Ass Faggot? Pro-homosexual? Nooooo!!!!

    It’s like someone just wanted a list of some gay places on the internets to hang out. They’re going to be quite dissappointed – I read Pam on Pandagon all the time but she’s long on the politics and short on the steamy descriptions of her hot lesbian exploits.

  114. lilcollegegirl said,

    November 29, 2006 at 17:04

    I talked to a silly fundy (who had an ingenious trap in the form of a “what do you believe” survey that lured me close) with the bit about the shellfish…and then he said, “Well, you know…shellfish is really bad for you.” Not at all kidding, he tried to argue that the supposed badness of the most delicious foods on earth meant that the shellfish prohibition was God protecting us.

  115. Steve T. said,

    November 29, 2006 at 17:58

    It’s like someone just wanted a list of some gay places on the internets to hang out.

    Oh fuck, Kyso, you’re right! He’s just posting a list of pre-screened gay sites for his fellow Christianist closet cases, sites they can read avidly in the name of “research” while slipping in a game of pocket pool and hoping no one will notice.

    And if they’re doing their “research” at home with all the curtains drawn, the issue of unclean keyboards becomes even more pertinent.

  116. Sadly, No! » Centrism: Anti-Populist And Wingnutty (The I’m-Naming-Names Edition) said,

    November 29, 2006 at 20:12

    [...] So there ya are, a list of past or current wingnut-enablers! Now I go back on hiatus, floating away on a gay-marriage magic rainbow, fiddling with my Swiss Army Abortion Kit and remembering to activate FAGG0TR0N, Thadly No!’s thiny new threadbot. [...]

  117. William K. Wolfrum » Blog Archive » “San Francisco Values” simplified said,

    November 29, 2006 at 21:43

    [...] There are lots of homosexuals in San Francisco. Vote for them, you’re a homosexual. [...]

  118. BoiseNick said,

    December 1, 2006 at 4:22

    Hey Homophobes, this is a wonderful service you haters have done for the entire American community, all the way down to gay friendly “straight, but not narrow” folks like we here at BushBlows.
    Remember,,,

    God says: ” Homophobes SUCK” . As much as Religious Racists ! Be they Christian, Jewish, Muslim or non-religious Atheist/Agnostic.

Leave a Comment