“Until the 2001 anthrax mailer is caught, conservative copycat terrorists should be allowed to operate with impunity.”

The implication from this article is that he had an already established history and execution pattern of this type of thing, making him easy to track.

In addition he apparently chose to use the same delivery method for separate threat attacks and to employ mail drops within easy walking distance of his home.

Not exactly the brightest of criminals.
Then again I don’t think I’ve ever met any truly bright criminals.

all i see is that he designed 1 circuit for an AM radio.
which doesnt mean much, cos lots of people have done it in the past.
probably thousands,
if you know radio at all, all you have to do, is take someone elses design, and change it a bit.

just wondering if he knew how to do anything at all
besides complain about the left.

heres another post of his….
maybe nothing, but he ends with the phrase “the perp was never found”
reminding me of his comments about his own letters mailed, saying that “theres not much info”
like he wants to know if theres more about it.
like i said,
probably nothing, but may be worth looking into.
—————————-
Posted by marc costanzo to Kuksool; Cicero; All
On News/Activism 11/09/2006 10:57:22 PM PST · 87 of 101

>>More like a news pundit future. I wouldn’t be surprised if Linc joins Buchanan and Scarbourgh to bash Bush on MSNBC.

http://tinyurl.com/ykf4kc
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2006/11/the-castagana-correspondence-right-what-you-know.php

“ITEMS TO BE SEIZED”
(item “P”)

possible chemicals that could be used to make WMD,
or literature on how to make it.

so, the mailings may not have comatained anthrax,
but this guy was FAR from being harmless !!!

plese POST THIS, blog the hell out of it.
the blogosphere forgot this little tidbit !!!

what if a liberal sent this to some repugs in office, or O’Reilly etc…

the guy would be waterboarded to death in Guantanamo !!!

Brad
http://911review.org

If I were killed so that my family, freinds and fellow citizens could be free and safe, that wouldn’t bother me much. It wouldn’t be the first time I’ve risked that.

If I were killed so that a terrorist could come to power, that would bother me a bit.

When the US military kills innocents, 99% of the time it is accidentally, and it happens because we are at war in Afghanistan (and elsewhere) so that everyone else may live as free men, women and children. So that the men may have a job future, so that the women don’t have to live like enslaved chattel who are executed on public soccer fields, and so that the little orphans don’t have to starve anymore because their husband was shot for listening to music and their mothers was hung for not wearing her burkha to the marketplace.

When the Taliban, Al Qaeda, insurgents, or any of the related terror organizations kill innocents they almost always do it intentionally, and it is not to free men, to liberate women, to feed and educate orphans, to rebuild cities, or to bring progress.

If you do not, are incapable of, or simply will not (for reasons of your own) understand the difference between those two intentions, those two methods of operating, and those two outcomes, that’s you fault. That’s your soul. That’s your mind. It’s got nothing to do with me or mine.

Turn your scalpel towards the cancer, not the doctor.

sanitas said,

November 13, 2006 at 18:59

Thank God someones here to protect the English langauge.

psst.. hey dipshit… it’s “someone’s”
It’s a contraction of someone and is, and requires an apostrophe.
If you’re going to be a grammar cop, don’t be a dumbass at the same time.

/good game

War is political. If it wasn’t, soldiers wouldn’t wear uniforms. The soldier may not be political, but the people who put his gun in his hand and tell him who to fire at are.

“We’re not the ones killing civilians in Iraq by the busload, the terrorists are.”

Within a year of 9/11, American bombs had destroyed three times as many innocent lives in Afghanistan as perished in the World Trade Center. I really think you should consider whether those people would have considered that an acceptable tradeoff.

Suez in SAfrica

Dear Suez,

If you really fought through Apartheid, then you got chops with me. I read what you’re saying. I had a little personal incident at college in regards to Apartheid, but that’s neither here nor there.

Nobody who has ever really been to war though thinks it is rah, rah, let’s bomb.
Of course you want to approach every dangerous situation with high morale and confidence, but that doesn’t mean you enjoy it or wish it weren’t necessary.

Wars of all kinds may be necessary, but they are not fun. A sort of protracted Civil War was necessary in South Africa to end Apratheid, and many people died and many were killed. But it was necessary. In the end.

And yes, there, like in any war, such as Iraq, politics is an important component. But politics didn’t win it, men and women willing to fight and die and the other side willing to change changed it. In other words to me politics was one of the tools of the Spirit of Man to be free, the Spirit of Man was not a tool of politics. (I know you didn’t mention Iraq in your post to me but some others did, and since I see the analogy, I’ll play the hand dealt me.)

But I’m not willing to leave the Iraqi kids and women and the innocent people there to the tender mercies of some up and coming terrorist regime. Or theocratic tyranny.

And yes, America has made plenty of mistakes in the past. All nations do. Fighting to liberate oppressed peoples is not one of them.

Fighting in a much better way, to liberate Iraq, I’m all for that. Giving them up to the enemy, I’m not for that.

But to tell you the truth, I don’t know what a normal Sadly, No reader is. I came here because I found this link as a reference to another article, so I’m completely ignorant of the normal readership.

I’m not a uniformed soldier by the way, not in the way I’m sure you’re thinking anyhow.

But I have been involve din things and seen things and worked on things both alone and with others which give me little interest in seeing people butchered or enslaved, no matter who they are or where they live.

Apartheid took a long time to kill. A long time doesn’t bother me at all, I’ve been around awhile. So I’m not easily discouraged by a three year war. Or a 40 year Cold War.

But I still say that although you and I have political disagreements on some things, this doesn’t mean everything that passes between us has to be reduced to politics.

Anyway, you and the others take care.

By the way, I wrote a poem some time ago about Africa.
I put it up on my website.

You might or might not like it.
I think I’ll post it there and you can tell me what you think of it if you like.

It’s at the bottom of the entry.

http://themissal.blogspot.com/2006/11/tuesday-science-and-technology-roundup.html

I see the moral equivalence.

I really do not appreciate the extreme’s in this country and I think that you need only look at the responses here to see some of the insanity. I will include the above as reference for the bs spouted by both extreme sides. Until the middle speaks up it will be the far-right and far-left that hold the rest of the country hostage.

Suez in SAfrica

That’s not true for everyone here. Go catch Mikey in one of the threads above.