<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OK, One More &#8220;Bwah-Ha-Ha,&#8221; and Then Bed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92985</link>
		<dc:creator>George Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 08:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92985</guid>
		<description>Justice Santorum makes complete sense.  That place has been going to the dogs lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice Santorum makes complete sense.  That place has been going to the dogs lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkwater</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92967</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 05:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92967</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The public cares little for the â€œtraditionsâ€? of the Senate or the way the appropriations process used to work. It demands results. Handed a large majority, the GOP frittered it away. The chief fritterer was Senator McCain and his Gang of 14 and Kennedy-McCain immigration bill, &lt;/blockquote&gt;
So, the Republicans lost because a Republican-sponsored bill in line with the President&#039;s desires was passed in the Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The public cares little for the â€œtraditionsâ€? of the Senate or the way the appropriations process used to work. It demands results. Handed a large majority, the GOP frittered it away. The chief fritterer was Senator McCain and his Gang of 14 and Kennedy-McCain immigration bill, </p></blockquote>
<p>So, the Republicans lost because a Republican-sponsored bill in line with the President&#8217;s desires was passed in the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salty</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92933</link>
		<dc:creator>salty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 03:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92933</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Hehe were in yr base killing yuor doods!1!!&lt;/i&gt;

Easily the best summation of the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Hehe were in yr base killing yuor doods!1!!</i></p>
<p>Easily the best summation of the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Badger</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92879</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 00:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92879</guid>
		<description>Hehe were in yr cngress revrsing yur legislationz!!!1!11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe were in yr cngress revrsing yur legislationz!!!1!11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crazyworld</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92869</link>
		<dc:creator>crazyworld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92869</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard of Hewitt before, and thought he was a real person, but I just followed your link and realized he&#039;s just a parody, like Jesus&#039; General, only more outrageous.  The dead giveaway was &quot;Rick Santorum for SCOTUS.  I laughed my ass off.  General J. C. Christian, you&#039;re on notice:  you&#039;ve got some serious competition!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard of Hewitt before, and thought he was a real person, but I just followed your link and realized he&#8217;s just a parody, like Jesus&#8217; General, only more outrageous.  The dead giveaway was &#8220;Rick Santorum for SCOTUS.  I laughed my ass off.  General J. C. Christian, you&#8217;re on notice:  you&#8217;ve got some serious competition!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jâ€”</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92809</link>
		<dc:creator>Jâ€”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92809</guid>
		<description>Buck up, soon-to-be-former Senator Santorum.  It looks like there&#039;s an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/15961748.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;opening at the Defense Department&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buck up, soon-to-be-former Senator Santorum.  It looks like there&#8217;s an <a href="http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/15961748.html" rel="nofollow">opening at the Defense Department</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demogenes Aristophanes</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92806</link>
		<dc:creator>Demogenes Aristophanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92806</guid>
		<description>Oh, and to add another point to Gary&#039;s - it would probably be wise to cut our losses and simply write off the state of Pennsylvania, as it was effectively under sharia law as of Santorum&#039;s concession speech last night. The fact is, women in Scranton are now being stoned to death for appearing in public without a burkha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and to add another point to Gary&#8217;s &#8211; it would probably be wise to cut our losses and simply write off the state of Pennsylvania, as it was effectively under sharia law as of Santorum&#8217;s concession speech last night. The fact is, women in Scranton are now being stoned to death for appearing in public without a burkha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demogenes Aristophanes</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92804</link>
		<dc:creator>Demogenes Aristophanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92804</guid>
		<description>Gary&#039;s absolutely right. But even worse, Pombo&#039;s loss has eliminated the last line of defense against an army of nuke-wielding jihadists who even now are just seconds from bombing the downtown Tracy Wal-Mart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary&#8217;s absolutely right. But even worse, Pombo&#8217;s loss has eliminated the last line of defense against an army of nuke-wielding jihadists who even now are just seconds from bombing the downtown Tracy Wal-Mart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Sidhe</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92798</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Sidhe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92798</guid>
		<description>Jillian, will you marry me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jillian, will you marry me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Someone</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92789</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92789</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Santorum SCOTUS Pombo&lt;/i&gt;

Is that anything like &quot;Klaatu barada nikto&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Santorum SCOTUS Pombo</i></p>
<p>Is that anything like &#8220;Klaatu barada nikto&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tb</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92786</link>
		<dc:creator>tb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92786</guid>
		<description>This is sweet. Anyone else spotted any wingnuts going  Schindler&#039;s List, heil-Hitlering on the end of a rope as the Russians kick apart the stool beneath him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is sweet. Anyone else spotted any wingnuts going  Schindler&#8217;s List, heil-Hitlering on the end of a rope as the Russians kick apart the stool beneath him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ruppert</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92777</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ruppert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92777</guid>
		<description>The fact is, Santorum&#039;s loss is a victory for the terrorists.  Altoona has just gone on red alert, and Johnstown is fortifying their dam system.  The Nancy Pelosi led Democrat party will be to blame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is, Santorum&#8217;s loss is a victory for the terrorists.  Altoona has just gone on red alert, and Johnstown is fortifying their dam system.  The Nancy Pelosi led Democrat party will be to blame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xebecs</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92768</link>
		<dc:creator>xebecs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92768</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why would Lieberman leave a Senate seat which is his for life for a two-year gig as a lame-duck cabinet member in a deeply unpopular administration?&lt;/i&gt;

Call me a dreamer, but I&#039;d say &quot;his for six more years&quot; is more accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why would Lieberman leave a Senate seat which is his for life for a two-year gig as a lame-duck cabinet member in a deeply unpopular administration?</i></p>
<p>Call me a dreamer, but I&#8217;d say &#8220;his for six more years&#8221; is more accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrooklynRaider</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92765</link>
		<dc:creator>BrooklynRaider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92765</guid>
		<description>Why would Lieberman leave a Senate seat which is his for life for a two-year gig as a lame-duck cabinet member in a deeply unpopular administration?

I wouldn&#039;t worry too much about that.  Joementum&#039;s going to milk his little swing status for all it&#039;s worth - he&#039;s going to be having too much fun to leave the Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would Lieberman leave a Senate seat which is his for life for a two-year gig as a lame-duck cabinet member in a deeply unpopular administration?</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t worry too much about that.  Joementum&#8217;s going to milk his little swing status for all it&#8217;s worth &#8211; he&#8217;s going to be having too much fun to leave the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marq</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92758</link>
		<dc:creator>Marq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92758</guid>
		<description>I agree with what &quot;Jillian said, November 8, 2006 at 12:05&quot; 150%. The hard work now lies ahead of us. We cannot allow our little group of Hee-Haw regulars to sit around slapping themselves on the back and drinking from the jug full of corn squeezin&#039;s. No. Gotta light a little fire under teh bastidz. Or, maybe, a conflagration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with what &#8220;Jillian said, November 8, 2006 at 12:05&#8243; 150%. The hard work now lies ahead of us. We cannot allow our little group of Hee-Haw regulars to sit around slapping themselves on the back and drinking from the jug full of corn squeezin&#8217;s. No. Gotta light a little fire under teh bastidz. Or, maybe, a conflagration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marq</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92753</link>
		<dc:creator>Marq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92753</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;President Bush will not flag in the pursuit of the war, and Senator Santorum is now available for a seat on the SCOTUS should one become available.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well, that&#039;s a nightmare scenario, ezzent it? Not, hopefully, that it would stand the proverbial snowball&#039;s chance, but still. I&#039;ve seen fucking &lt;i&gt;Ashcroft&#039;s &lt;/i&gt;name bandied about for the SCOTUS, and worse. Let&#039;s face it, if Shrubby McLintlock gets another go at a SCOTUS nomination, his choice is gonna flat-out suck, no matter what, so we gotta try and make sure he doesn&#039;t get another one (best health wishes to you, justice Stevens! &lt;i&gt;please &lt;/i&gt;don&#039;t retire! or die.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>President Bush will not flag in the pursuit of the war, and Senator Santorum is now available for a seat on the SCOTUS should one become available.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s a nightmare scenario, ezzent it? Not, hopefully, that it would stand the proverbial snowball&#8217;s chance, but still. I&#8217;ve seen fucking <i>Ashcroft&#8217;s </i>name bandied about for the SCOTUS, and worse. Let&#8217;s face it, if Shrubby McLintlock gets another go at a SCOTUS nomination, his choice is gonna flat-out suck, no matter what, so we gotta try and make sure he doesn&#8217;t get another one (best health wishes to you, justice Stevens! <i>please </i>don&#8217;t retire! or die.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notorious P.A.T.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92722</link>
		<dc:creator>Notorious P.A.T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 13:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92722</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;President Bush will not flag in the pursuit of the war, and Senator Santorum is now available for a seat on the SCOTUS should one become available.&lt;/i&gt;

No way!  Pammy says Santorum is presidential material!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>President Bush will not flag in the pursuit of the war, and Senator Santorum is now available for a seat on the SCOTUS should one become available.</i></p>
<p>No way!  Pammy says Santorum is presidential material!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ats</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92720</link>
		<dc:creator>ats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 13:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92720</guid>
		<description>Poor Halperin. Sucking up to the wrong pundit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Halperin. Sucking up to the wrong pundit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karatist Preacher</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92706</link>
		<dc:creator>Karatist Preacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92706</guid>
		<description>Santorum and SCOTUS in the same sentence...time for bed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Santorum and SCOTUS in the same sentence&#8230;time for bed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Yoshida</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92705</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Yoshida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/4212.html#comment-92705</guid>
		<description>Nuke Kazakhstan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuke Kazakhstan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

