Funny how he doesn’t seem to mind the utter nuking of separation of powers when it’s The Most Holy George W. Christ doing the nuking…

(I mean, don’t you love it that Exhibit A in the case against Al Gore is something he never said? What the Hell else do you need to know about these people?)

The Chewbacca Defense is hard to fight. I mean, would he really want to live on Endor?

You could come up with a new name, but why reinvent the wheel?

So- I’ve got this morbid curiosity to find out just what did happen to Dan Riehl’s probably AIDS-ridden welfare queen gay brother (according to Dan Riehl). If there was a pay-pal button to donate towards that, I would.

And if an individual feels he wants to live out his life in private because the world today has not shifted enough generation-ally so as to relegate their sexual preference to some meaningless and fictitious norm … I have no problem with that.

so…it doesn’t bother him that the world is a place that made his own brother die alone?

i don’t understand. pinko punko is right. also, INTRUDER ALERT. don’t know why.

in re: capitalization. i’m against it. the [.] does the job of denoting the end of the sentence quite well. the capital just gilds the lily. plus, in those infrequent cases where a word’s meaning changes based on the capitalization (or lack thereof) of the first letter, one can still use it. as an example, a reader can infer that a person who mostly doesn’t capitalize but chooses to do so with the word Gay is, in fact, crazy. or gay.

There’s a number of key phrases used in debates that I’ve come to see as shorthand for “quit wasting your precious time with this jackass”, and this is one of them. For one, it’s a bit embarrasing to see a grown human being use such a junior high-esque dodge. Secondly, it cuts me as a bit silly to get all aghast that someone would have the audacity to judge someone’s character by the very words he or she writes. If one were inclined to see things in such a way, the whole “how dare you judge me, you don’t know me, maaaan” squawk generally denotes a rhetorical battleship being sunken somewhere, especially with the venom and nastiness expressed above.

Apart from that, I really don’t understand the wingnuts’ outrage over the recent NJ decision. The courts did their job. They looked at the laws as written, looked at the Rule Book (they call it a “state constitution”) and said, “Nope, doesn’t add up”. If I recall correctly, the decision said the legislature had to go back and re-write the law in question to either specifically outlaw gay marriage or specifically include it. That’s how the system works, that’s how it’s supposed to work. It’s called checks and balances.

Man, didn’t any of these assholes take 8th grade civics class? We were taught this shit in Mississippi, for cryin’ out loud.

The word itself bears vague resemblances to the things I want the word to inherently and vaguely associate with these ass-clowns. Bush, fundies and bullshit, for three.

Or “Bushist,” if you just want to peg them to Dubya with added overtones of fanatical political underhandedness with totalitarian outcomes…

Words (and marketing/propaganda) are SO powerful, we rarely realize how much so on a conscious level. It affects people, even jaded tune-it-out types like myself who like to think it doesn’t.* So whatever we come up with, it’s gotta be good and repeated often!

(*that’s why I’d LOVE for someone to rename the Fed’s newest department to something more like “Department of Internal Security” –or fold it into Interior. None of this Homeland-Motherland-Vaterland Uber Alles shit, thanks.)

Profligate.

I know, I know, it doesn’t roll trippingly off the tongue, but at least the Greedy Old Profligates wouldn’t have to re-monogram all the towels.

mikey

The way conservatives say, “All you liberals have is hatred for Bush!”

(To which I say, “Even if that was true, could you include your point?”)

But it’s bullshit.

Liberals hate conservatism. And conservatives.

And we have PLENTY of exhibits to explain why. For example, the logic processes of every conservative.