<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Thought</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-186232</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-186232</guid>
		<description>I had this very thought and came to this site because of this same thought</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had this very thought and came to this site because of this same thought</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CelticKnight52</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-105610</link>
		<dc:creator>CelticKnight52</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 08:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-105610</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t think it will happen. He could not get away with it. You have to remember that he would have to order the military to confiscate firearms from citizens, and that ain&#039;t gonna happen. Hell, in Michigan alone, there are a million hunters with firearms. Think of all the militia types that would cry out &quot;see, we told you so&quot;, grab their&#039; guns and fight the military. It would be an all out civil war between the militia types, the hunters and conservatives like Charleton Heston who state that the only way their&#039; guns are going to be taken away is from their&#039; cold dead hands. Bush would have to FIRST get the congress RIGHT now to pass some law outlawing firearms, or order it by declaring martial law ...and we&#039;re back to square one....citizens fighting the law enforcement.  You think the russians had a hard time with Afghanistan and lost that one, imagine our military trying a hundred thousand people in this country. One big bloody civil war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t think it will happen. He could not get away with it. You have to remember that he would have to order the military to confiscate firearms from citizens, and that ain&#8217;t gonna happen. Hell, in Michigan alone, there are a million hunters with firearms. Think of all the militia types that would cry out &#8220;see, we told you so&#8221;, grab their&#8217; guns and fight the military. It would be an all out civil war between the militia types, the hunters and conservatives like Charleton Heston who state that the only way their&#8217; guns are going to be taken away is from their&#8217; cold dead hands. Bush would have to FIRST get the congress RIGHT now to pass some law outlawing firearms, or order it by declaring martial law &#8230;and we&#8217;re back to square one&#8230;.citizens fighting the law enforcement.  You think the russians had a hard time with Afghanistan and lost that one, imagine our military trying a hundred thousand people in this country. One big bloody civil war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dc2berkeley</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-84346</link>
		<dc:creator>dc2berkeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-84346</guid>
		<description>It seems clear to me that this bunch has no intention of giving up power.  There are way too many skeletons in the closet to allow anyone else to have the keys.  Whether it&#039;s Bush redux or another puppet, the front man is not important, only the puppet masters.  This explains their support for an infinite expansion of executive power -- they have no fear of Hillary or any other Dem taking power because they can ensure that won&#039;t happen.  Face it, absent the big economic crash (which is going to happen, but we&#039;re probably a couple of years away from that) the American people will do nothing ... it&#039;s too hard/boring and look, American Idol vote is up next.  And if you are pinning your hopes on the military to step in and save the day, your kids must have been awfully disappointed on Christmas day when Santa Claus failed to deliver their presents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems clear to me that this bunch has no intention of giving up power.  There are way too many skeletons in the closet to allow anyone else to have the keys.  Whether it&#8217;s Bush redux or another puppet, the front man is not important, only the puppet masters.  This explains their support for an infinite expansion of executive power &#8212; they have no fear of Hillary or any other Dem taking power because they can ensure that won&#8217;t happen.  Face it, absent the big economic crash (which is going to happen, but we&#8217;re probably a couple of years away from that) the American people will do nothing &#8230; it&#8217;s too hard/boring and look, American Idol vote is up next.  And if you are pinning your hopes on the military to step in and save the day, your kids must have been awfully disappointed on Christmas day when Santa Claus failed to deliver their presents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pope Bandar bin Turtle</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-84219</link>
		<dc:creator>Pope Bandar bin Turtle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-84219</guid>
		<description>Sometime prior to the 2008 elections, there will be ...

(1) A terrorist attack on U.S. soil.

(2) A declaration of martial law.

(3) A cancellation of the 2008 elections.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometime prior to the 2008 elections, there will be &#8230;</p>
<p>(1) A terrorist attack on U.S. soil.</p>
<p>(2) A declaration of martial law.</p>
<p>(3) A cancellation of the 2008 elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. A. Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-84137</link>
		<dc:creator>J. A. Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-84137</guid>
		<description>I think that there&#039;s a key element that everyone&#039;s forgetting in calcuating their doomsday scenarios: the reaction of the world community.

In order for the Rethugs to successfully pull off a coup, two things absolutely have to happen:

1) They must seize absolute power somehow. The GOP controls all three branches of government, yet they constantly whine that they don&#039;t have enough power to enact all the Reich-wing wet dream policies. They can do this in one of three ways: a) the good old-fashioned military coup, b) a &lt;em&gt;V for Vendetta&lt;/em&gt; scenario where a terrorist attack (either gov&#039;t-produced like in the movie, or genuine A-Q strike), or c) steal the election. Secnario A is iffy at best, since our military still consists of soldiers who take their oaths to defend the Constitution seriously (Lynndie England and her ilk excluded). Although it could potentially bring the military in on the side of the Bushies, Scenario B seems more likely to backfire at this point than succeed, now that Hurricane Katrina has exposed the Bush regime&#039;s utter incompetence, corruption and cronyism (though if you ask me, 1000-plus dead seems an awfully heavy price to pay to achieve that exposure). So we&#039;re left with Scenario C: Steal the election. The tools are already there (shred enough Dem registrations in key districts, intimidate voters in heavily Dem districts, and if all else fails, the Diebold option is always available), but in order to work, Scenario C relies on the other unspoken assumption.

2) Getting the world community to believe that the election is legit. Unless the Rethuglicans allow impartial election monitors (ha ha ha...that&#039;ll happen - AND PIGS MIGHT FLY OUT OF MY BUTT!!!!!), the world community will be reluctant, at best, to go along. More than likely, out of a desire to avoid blowing up the world, they&#039;ll treat it as a &lt;em&gt;fiat accompli&lt;/em&gt;, since there&#039;s not much they can do until we&#039;re blatantly threatening the world. However, at the first sign of fascist movement in our country, they&#039;ll start to organize a coalition to stop our mad quest for world conquest. Whether that means a new Cold War with the U.S. cast in the role of the Soviets, or just outright WWIII, complete with &lt;strike&gt;nookyular&lt;/strike&gt; nuclear exchanges, is up in the air.

So what form will that tell-tale sign that triggers a response from the world community take? Hard to say. But watch for the prompt court-packing that will almost assuredly follow a stolen &#039;06 election, so as to minimize the chance that Reich-wing wet dream policies will be struck down by the courts. That will be the first warning that the world should take notice. After that....well, my rather limited prognostication skills aren&#039;t capable of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that there&#8217;s a key element that everyone&#8217;s forgetting in calcuating their doomsday scenarios: the reaction of the world community.</p>
<p>In order for the Rethugs to successfully pull off a coup, two things absolutely have to happen:</p>
<p>1) They must seize absolute power somehow. The GOP controls all three branches of government, yet they constantly whine that they don&#8217;t have enough power to enact all the Reich-wing wet dream policies. They can do this in one of three ways: a) the good old-fashioned military coup, b) a <em>V for Vendetta</em> scenario where a terrorist attack (either gov&#8217;t-produced like in the movie, or genuine A-Q strike), or c) steal the election. Secnario A is iffy at best, since our military still consists of soldiers who take their oaths to defend the Constitution seriously (Lynndie England and her ilk excluded). Although it could potentially bring the military in on the side of the Bushies, Scenario B seems more likely to backfire at this point than succeed, now that Hurricane Katrina has exposed the Bush regime&#8217;s utter incompetence, corruption and cronyism (though if you ask me, 1000-plus dead seems an awfully heavy price to pay to achieve that exposure). So we&#8217;re left with Scenario C: Steal the election. The tools are already there (shred enough Dem registrations in key districts, intimidate voters in heavily Dem districts, and if all else fails, the Diebold option is always available), but in order to work, Scenario C relies on the other unspoken assumption.</p>
<p>2) Getting the world community to believe that the election is legit. Unless the Rethuglicans allow impartial election monitors (ha ha ha&#8230;that&#8217;ll happen &#8211; AND PIGS MIGHT FLY OUT OF MY BUTT!!!!!), the world community will be reluctant, at best, to go along. More than likely, out of a desire to avoid blowing up the world, they&#8217;ll treat it as a <em>fiat accompli</em>, since there&#8217;s not much they can do until we&#8217;re blatantly threatening the world. However, at the first sign of fascist movement in our country, they&#8217;ll start to organize a coalition to stop our mad quest for world conquest. Whether that means a new Cold War with the U.S. cast in the role of the Soviets, or just outright WWIII, complete with <strike>nookyular</strike> nuclear exchanges, is up in the air.</p>
<p>So what form will that tell-tale sign that triggers a response from the world community take? Hard to say. But watch for the prompt court-packing that will almost assuredly follow a stolen &#8217;06 election, so as to minimize the chance that Reich-wing wet dream policies will be struck down by the courts. That will be the first warning that the world should take notice. After that&#8230;.well, my rather limited prognostication skills aren&#8217;t capable of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whig</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83905</link>
		<dc:creator>whig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 06:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83905</guid>
		<description>I think the intended plan is a hand-off to John McCain. I wrote more about this a week ago or so: &lt;a href=&quot;http://cannablog.wordpress.com/2006/09/25/bushs-designated-successor/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bush&#039;s designated successor&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the intended plan is a hand-off to John McCain. I wrote more about this a week ago or so: <a href="http://cannablog.wordpress.com/2006/09/25/bushs-designated-successor/" rel="nofollow">Bush&#8217;s designated successor</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83895</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 04:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83895</guid>
		<description>You call it leaving the White House when his term is up. He calls it Cutting and Running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You call it leaving the White House when his term is up. He calls it Cutting and Running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emboldened &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A thought and a question</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83849</link>
		<dc:creator>Emboldened &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A thought and a question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 01:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83849</guid>
		<description>[...] Gavin of Sadly, No! posed this thought: I just want to throw this into the general discourse, without, at this point, examining it very closely or crafting any arguments for or against it. Itâ€™s only a thought right now. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gavin of Sadly, No! posed this thought: I just want to throw this into the general discourse, without, at this point, examining it very closely or crafting any arguments for or against it. Itâ€™s only a thought right now. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebewilderness</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83788</link>
		<dc:creator>thebewilderness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83788</guid>
		<description>There will be a sign.  That sign will be the replacement of the Biggus Dickkus.  If the Biggus Dickkus is not replace by the future corrupt pro torture overlord, then I expect W to continue as the corrupt pro torture overlord in charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will be a sign.  That sign will be the replacement of the Biggus Dickkus.  If the Biggus Dickkus is not replace by the future corrupt pro torture overlord, then I expect W to continue as the corrupt pro torture overlord in charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smiling Mortician</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83784</link>
		<dc:creator>Smiling Mortician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83784</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; I have complete certainty that, in this case at least, the good guys far outnumber the bad guysâ€¦&lt;/i&gt;

Agreed. Yes, I&#039;m guilty of at least a small degree of eternal optimism -- after all, doesn&#039;t being a lefty mean that I believe people are inherently good rather than evil?

I do believe that W&#039;s five-year pass has been more the result of ignorance, complacency and exhaustion among the people than actual support. Of the three, I think exhaustion is the most formidable obstacle we must overcome. The ignorance has been decreasing of late, owing to revelations that took their sweet time to hit the national stage (Woodward, anyone?), and the outrage in response to those revelations, or even just the quiet not of the head among those who secretly suspected it all along, does erode complacency.

A coup? I don&#039;t see it, if only because I don&#039;t think the true believers in the RoveCheney camp have the numbers. Stealing the election ala Diebold? That&#039;s a much more realistic scenario, especially if enough distractions muck up the radar screens so that we forget to police the damn elections . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> I have complete certainty that, in this case at least, the good guys far outnumber the bad guysâ€¦</i></p>
<p>Agreed. Yes, I&#8217;m guilty of at least a small degree of eternal optimism &#8212; after all, doesn&#8217;t being a lefty mean that I believe people are inherently good rather than evil?</p>
<p>I do believe that W&#8217;s five-year pass has been more the result of ignorance, complacency and exhaustion among the people than actual support. Of the three, I think exhaustion is the most formidable obstacle we must overcome. The ignorance has been decreasing of late, owing to revelations that took their sweet time to hit the national stage (Woodward, anyone?), and the outrage in response to those revelations, or even just the quiet not of the head among those who secretly suspected it all along, does erode complacency.</p>
<p>A coup? I don&#8217;t see it, if only because I don&#8217;t think the true believers in the RoveCheney camp have the numbers. Stealing the election ala Diebold? That&#8217;s a much more realistic scenario, especially if enough distractions muck up the radar screens so that we forget to police the damn elections . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83778</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 17:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83778</guid>
		<description>Hey, anything can happen, and given enough cover in world events, they could get away with it for a while.  But I&#039;ll make 2 points here.  First, all it would take is a small subset of the military.  An armored brigade and a fighter squadron would be enough.  Our guys would not rush out to fight each other.  They just wouldn&#039;t.  And the cover would have to be airtight - if it looked like a duck and walked like a duck, they would stop it anyway.  

The second point addresses Marq&#039;s nightmare scenario.  The hole in your theory is just who, exactly, would carry out these &#039;disappearances&#039; of Americans?  You need too much complicity, too many bad people willing to do things they don&#039;t believe in.  I have complete certainty that, in this case at least, the good guys far outnumber the bad guys...

mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, anything can happen, and given enough cover in world events, they could get away with it for a while.  But I&#8217;ll make 2 points here.  First, all it would take is a small subset of the military.  An armored brigade and a fighter squadron would be enough.  Our guys would not rush out to fight each other.  They just wouldn&#8217;t.  And the cover would have to be airtight &#8211; if it looked like a duck and walked like a duck, they would stop it anyway.  </p>
<p>The second point addresses Marq&#8217;s nightmare scenario.  The hole in your theory is just who, exactly, would carry out these &#8216;disappearances&#8217; of Americans?  You need too much complicity, too many bad people willing to do things they don&#8217;t believe in.  I have complete certainty that, in this case at least, the good guys far outnumber the bad guys&#8230;</p>
<p>mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83776</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 17:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83776</guid>
		<description>The Right doesn&#039;t need to stage something as messy as a coup to stay in power. They can steal an election.

And regarding the military ---mikey, I love you and agree with you 99% of the time, but doesn&#039;t the oath cut both ways? If the military believes, or is led to believe that the power grab is legitimate, then their oath will ensure that they follow along like good soldiers. 

What happens if martial law is declared? The military follows along, correct?

If some terrorist act occurs close to the election - staged or otherwise (I wouldn&#039;t put it past them, but really, they don&#039;t need to stage it because Al Quaeda will oblige them) - Bush and Cheney declare martial law and suspend the election, I think the military would support it. AFter all, it&#039;s the Commander in Chief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Right doesn&#8217;t need to stage something as messy as a coup to stay in power. They can steal an election.</p>
<p>And regarding the military &#8212;mikey, I love you and agree with you 99% of the time, but doesn&#8217;t the oath cut both ways? If the military believes, or is led to believe that the power grab is legitimate, then their oath will ensure that they follow along like good soldiers. </p>
<p>What happens if martial law is declared? The military follows along, correct?</p>
<p>If some terrorist act occurs close to the election &#8211; staged or otherwise (I wouldn&#8217;t put it past them, but really, they don&#8217;t need to stage it because Al Quaeda will oblige them) &#8211; Bush and Cheney declare martial law and suspend the election, I think the military would support it. AFter all, it&#8217;s the Commander in Chief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marq</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83775</link>
		<dc:creator>Marq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 17:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83775</guid>
		<description>The military need not agree to a Shrub dictatorship in order for one to occur. Here&#039;s how it could go: at some point in &#039;07 or &#039;08 (think October Surprise &#039;08), there is a major &quot;terrorist&quot; incident on par with 9/11 if not worse. If it happens to be caused by real terrorists, fine, but the CIA will do in a pinch. It would be even better if there were &lt;i&gt;several &lt;/i&gt;incidents over a couple of days that added up to 9/11-like casualty figures. In any event, due to the &quot;serious&quot; threat to the very survival of our nation, the Chimp declares a &quot;temporary&quot; state of martial law, and that seems very legitimate to the majority of the military. After all, it&#039;s only a &quot;temporary&quot; thing. A few may note that the Chimp-In-Chief is pretty vague about how long this &quot;state of emergency&quot; will last. The &#039;08 elections are &quot;postponed,&quot; once again for a nebulous amount of time, in the grand tradition of tinhorn dictators everywhere.
Congress hastily votes to allow the Preznit to enact law through Executive Orders. Arbusto &lt;i&gt;immediately &lt;/i&gt;reinstates the draft. Eventually, Congress is either partially of fully dissolved. Shrub begins replacing state Governors with generals and admirals. A great many people begin to disappear, most of them die-hard administration critics. A severe crackdown is initiated on the interwebs, where left blogsylvainia evaporates overnight. Surprisingly, there are as many right-wing blogs and as much porn as ever--unless, of course, they have &lt;i&gt;ever &lt;/i&gt;expressed a critical thought about the Preznit. Sully is never heard from again, but the PowerToolz are all safely accounted for.
By this point, the ones who might have wondered when the super-special state of emergency might actually come to an end have either been disappeared or sent to serve on the front lines of any number of seething colonial wars. Thirty or forty years go by before there is a rebellion, which goes fairly much unnoted as we had dragged the rest of the world down with us into barbarism.
And we all lived happily ever after. Teh End.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The military need not agree to a Shrub dictatorship in order for one to occur. Here&#8217;s how it could go: at some point in &#8217;07 or &#8217;08 (think October Surprise &#8217;08), there is a major &#8220;terrorist&#8221; incident on par with 9/11 if not worse. If it happens to be caused by real terrorists, fine, but the CIA will do in a pinch. It would be even better if there were <i>several </i>incidents over a couple of days that added up to 9/11-like casualty figures. In any event, due to the &#8220;serious&#8221; threat to the very survival of our nation, the Chimp declares a &#8220;temporary&#8221; state of martial law, and that seems very legitimate to the majority of the military. After all, it&#8217;s only a &#8220;temporary&#8221; thing. A few may note that the Chimp-In-Chief is pretty vague about how long this &#8220;state of emergency&#8221; will last. The &#8217;08 elections are &#8220;postponed,&#8221; once again for a nebulous amount of time, in the grand tradition of tinhorn dictators everywhere.<br />
Congress hastily votes to allow the Preznit to enact law through Executive Orders. Arbusto <i>immediately </i>reinstates the draft. Eventually, Congress is either partially of fully dissolved. Shrub begins replacing state Governors with generals and admirals. A great many people begin to disappear, most of them die-hard administration critics. A severe crackdown is initiated on the interwebs, where left blogsylvainia evaporates overnight. Surprisingly, there are as many right-wing blogs and as much porn as ever&#8211;unless, of course, they have <i>ever </i>expressed a critical thought about the Preznit. Sully is never heard from again, but the PowerToolz are all safely accounted for.<br />
By this point, the ones who might have wondered when the super-special state of emergency might actually come to an end have either been disappeared or sent to serve on the front lines of any number of seething colonial wars. Thirty or forty years go by before there is a rebellion, which goes fairly much unnoted as we had dragged the rest of the world down with us into barbarism.<br />
And we all lived happily ever after. Teh End.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notorious P.A.T.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83756</link>
		<dc:creator>Notorious P.A.T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83756</guid>
		<description>Mikey, I do have a lot of trust in our military personnel.  But I also look at our military and see a broken, exhausted force, most of whom is currently deployed halfway across the world.  I know they would LIKE to stop a Bush coup, but are they CAPABLE of doing it any time soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikey, I do have a lot of trust in our military personnel.  But I also look at our military and see a broken, exhausted force, most of whom is currently deployed halfway across the world.  I know they would LIKE to stop a Bush coup, but are they CAPABLE of doing it any time soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notorious P.A.T.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83752</link>
		<dc:creator>Notorious P.A.T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83752</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;FOX shows footage of the Democratic â€˜leadersâ€™ of Congress being loaded into paddywagons for the long trip toâ€¦&lt;/i&gt;

More like &quot;FOX shows footage of the Democrats in Congress willingly entering paddywagons for fear of being seen as &#039;week on terrorism&#039;&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>FOX shows footage of the Democratic â€˜leadersâ€™ of Congress being loaded into paddywagons for the long trip toâ€¦</i></p>
<p>More like &#8220;FOX shows footage of the Democrats in Congress willingly entering paddywagons for fear of being seen as &#8216;week on terrorism&#8217;&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jillian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83748</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 14:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83748</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s quite as simple as just Bush staying in power, but I do think the neocon goal is toward a similar end, just with a different means.

There&#039;s a thick stripe of idealism in neoconservativism.  Probably comes from the roots a lot of them have in Trotskyist communism - Bill Kristol&#039;s parents were both Trotskyites back in the day, for instance.  

The stuff they peddle now is a creepy blend of Milton Friedman&#039;s politics/economics and Leo Strauss&#039; contempt for the hoi polloi and peculiar ideas on reading and meaning (which could lead into an interesting tangent about why evolution-deniers from right wing think tanks like the Discovery Institute often sound like radical feminists, but that&#039;s a story for another time).

Strauss is probably best known for his embrace of the &quot;noble lie&quot; - that political leaders are under no obligation to be truthful to those whom the govern, who couldn&#039;t handle the truth anyway.  Little people need little truths to keep them in line - like God, patriotism, and father figure leaders.

Now, please don&#039;t misread me into saying that Leo Strauss was a Nazi, because that&#039;s not what I&#039;m trying to do here....Straussianism and National Socialism are two distinct trains of thought, with different origins.  That being said....there is a good bit of overlap in this particular area of their ideas between what Leo Strauss thought and what the Nazi political machine did.  Nazis embraced or created simple cultural myths for their people to follow  - thus, the endless sloganeering: &quot;Gott Mit Uns&quot;, &quot;Blut und Boden&quot;, &quot;Kuche, Kirche, und Kinder&quot;.  I&#039;m not saying Strauss would have approved of their ends. but I don&#039;t see how he could argue much with their means.

This, incidentally, is why people keep getting the creepy Nazi/fascist vibe from the current administration - it has nothing to do with Bush being like Hitler, and everything to do with Bush being surrounded by dangerous, anti-humanist idealists who hold the simple minded rabble of this country in a paternalistic contempt.

Sorry for being longwided here....utlimately, I think what the neocons want is a nice, proud father figure to run this country on their terms.  It doesn&#039;t necessarily have to be Bush...in fact, I don&#039;t think he&#039;d even work at this point; his popularity is too damaged.  If they can&#039;t get Bush to work out, they&#039;ll keep trying until they find the right guy.  I doubt Bush will care much; he&#039;s not really an idealist like some of these guys are.  If not Bush, then someone else.  The end result will be the same.

Consider the current administration their test run.  Then think how much worse it will be once they&#039;ve tweaked their operations to be more efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s quite as simple as just Bush staying in power, but I do think the neocon goal is toward a similar end, just with a different means.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a thick stripe of idealism in neoconservativism.  Probably comes from the roots a lot of them have in Trotskyist communism &#8211; Bill Kristol&#8217;s parents were both Trotskyites back in the day, for instance.  </p>
<p>The stuff they peddle now is a creepy blend of Milton Friedman&#8217;s politics/economics and Leo Strauss&#8217; contempt for the hoi polloi and peculiar ideas on reading and meaning (which could lead into an interesting tangent about why evolution-deniers from right wing think tanks like the Discovery Institute often sound like radical feminists, but that&#8217;s a story for another time).</p>
<p>Strauss is probably best known for his embrace of the &#8220;noble lie&#8221; &#8211; that political leaders are under no obligation to be truthful to those whom the govern, who couldn&#8217;t handle the truth anyway.  Little people need little truths to keep them in line &#8211; like God, patriotism, and father figure leaders.</p>
<p>Now, please don&#8217;t misread me into saying that Leo Strauss was a Nazi, because that&#8217;s not what I&#8217;m trying to do here&#8230;.Straussianism and National Socialism are two distinct trains of thought, with different origins.  That being said&#8230;.there is a good bit of overlap in this particular area of their ideas between what Leo Strauss thought and what the Nazi political machine did.  Nazis embraced or created simple cultural myths for their people to follow  &#8211; thus, the endless sloganeering: &#8220;Gott Mit Uns&#8221;, &#8220;Blut und Boden&#8221;, &#8220;Kuche, Kirche, und Kinder&#8221;.  I&#8217;m not saying Strauss would have approved of their ends. but I don&#8217;t see how he could argue much with their means.</p>
<p>This, incidentally, is why people keep getting the creepy Nazi/fascist vibe from the current administration &#8211; it has nothing to do with Bush being like Hitler, and everything to do with Bush being surrounded by dangerous, anti-humanist idealists who hold the simple minded rabble of this country in a paternalistic contempt.</p>
<p>Sorry for being longwided here&#8230;.utlimately, I think what the neocons want is a nice, proud father figure to run this country on their terms.  It doesn&#8217;t necessarily have to be Bush&#8230;in fact, I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;d even work at this point; his popularity is too damaged.  If they can&#8217;t get Bush to work out, they&#8217;ll keep trying until they find the right guy.  I doubt Bush will care much; he&#8217;s not really an idealist like some of these guys are.  If not Bush, then someone else.  The end result will be the same.</p>
<p>Consider the current administration their test run.  Then think how much worse it will be once they&#8217;ve tweaked their operations to be more efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACG</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83736</link>
		<dc:creator>ACG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 11:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83736</guid>
		<description>Now that I think about it, maybe this is why the administration was so quick to deny allegations that Osama bin Laden has died of some kind of disease.  Think of what it would mean for them:

1. The administration never brought him to justice and will now never get the chance.
2. There will now be no more videos with a tall, creepy tan dude reminding the American people that we&#039;re in terrible danger and need the administration to protect us.

Does the Congressional Quarterly have a classifieds section?

&lt;i&gt;Casting Call&lt;/i&gt;
One actor - video work for syndication.  Non-union, uncredited.
&lt;b&gt;Gender:&lt;/b&gt; Male
&lt;b&gt;Age:&lt;/b&gt; 65+
&lt;b&gt;Ethnicity:&lt;/b&gt; Brown
&lt;b&gt;Hair:&lt;/b&gt; Gray
&lt;b&gt;Build:&lt;/b&gt; 6&#039;5&quot;, lanky
Discretion a must.  Firearms experience and fluency in Arabic a bonus.  Send resume, head shot, classified security clearance to krove@whitehouse.gov.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I think about it, maybe this is why the administration was so quick to deny allegations that Osama bin Laden has died of some kind of disease.  Think of what it would mean for them:</p>
<p>1. The administration never brought him to justice and will now never get the chance.<br />
2. There will now be no more videos with a tall, creepy tan dude reminding the American people that we&#8217;re in terrible danger and need the administration to protect us.</p>
<p>Does the Congressional Quarterly have a classifieds section?</p>
<p><i>Casting Call</i><br />
One actor &#8211; video work for syndication.  Non-union, uncredited.<br />
<b>Gender:</b> Male<br />
<b>Age:</b> 65+<br />
<b>Ethnicity:</b> Brown<br />
<b>Hair:</b> Gray<br />
<b>Build:</b> 6&#8217;5&#8243;, lanky<br />
Discretion a must.  Firearms experience and fluency in Arabic a bonus.  Send resume, head shot, classified security clearance to <a href="mailto:krove@whitehouse.gov">krove@whitehouse.gov</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACG</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83735</link>
		<dc:creator>ACG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 11:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83735</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with mikey and JK47.  I don&#039;t think the military would stand for it.  All of the people I know in the mlitary, save maybe two, do so because they want to serve their country, not because they want to serve their president.  And when they saw the constitution being threatened like that, they&#039;d remember their oath and be able to do the right thing.

Moreover, I don&#039;t think Bush would &lt;i&gt;want&lt;/i&gt; to stay in office.  It isn&#039;t fun anymore.  Back when he first got elected and everybody loved him, he had the kewlest job ever.  Even after 9/11, his approval ratings were high, everybody was totally nice to him, and all he really had to do was play a few rounds of Risk before retiring to his ranch to cut some brush.  Now, though, people aren&#039;t being nice to him, his administration is starting to be called on its crap, and his job is no longer awesome.  I suspect he&#039;s got January 2009 marked on his calendary with a big happy face sticker, because that&#039;s when he can stop having to pretend to care about the country and start drawing government pension.

The scary thing to me is that when Bush is out of office, the real baby eaters - Rove, Cheney, Rumsfeld - will remain, and they&#039;re the ones who have been pulling the strings of the administration all along.  And the fact is, Gary Ruppert, that they don&#039;t &lt;i&gt;need&lt;/i&gt; Bush after 2008.  All they need is some kind of world event serious enough to get the American people scared, but not serious enough that the American people realize how the administration has fallen down on the job of truly protecting them.  Once they&#039;ve got a brand-new puppet in the White House (and I&#039;m not sure it would be John McCain; he drinks the Kool-Aid, but I think in the end, he&#039;d be too capable of independent thought for them to control him consistently), they&#039;ve already got legislation in place to give him, and through him, them, the power of a king.  Same old administration, brand new puppety figurehead.

So don&#039;t worry.  I mean, yeah, we&#039;re screwed, but it&#039;s not going to happen like you&#039;re thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with mikey and JK47.  I don&#8217;t think the military would stand for it.  All of the people I know in the mlitary, save maybe two, do so because they want to serve their country, not because they want to serve their president.  And when they saw the constitution being threatened like that, they&#8217;d remember their oath and be able to do the right thing.</p>
<p>Moreover, I don&#8217;t think Bush would <i>want</i> to stay in office.  It isn&#8217;t fun anymore.  Back when he first got elected and everybody loved him, he had the kewlest job ever.  Even after 9/11, his approval ratings were high, everybody was totally nice to him, and all he really had to do was play a few rounds of Risk before retiring to his ranch to cut some brush.  Now, though, people aren&#8217;t being nice to him, his administration is starting to be called on its crap, and his job is no longer awesome.  I suspect he&#8217;s got January 2009 marked on his calendary with a big happy face sticker, because that&#8217;s when he can stop having to pretend to care about the country and start drawing government pension.</p>
<p>The scary thing to me is that when Bush is out of office, the real baby eaters &#8211; Rove, Cheney, Rumsfeld &#8211; will remain, and they&#8217;re the ones who have been pulling the strings of the administration all along.  And the fact is, Gary Ruppert, that they don&#8217;t <i>need</i> Bush after 2008.  All they need is some kind of world event serious enough to get the American people scared, but not serious enough that the American people realize how the administration has fallen down on the job of truly protecting them.  Once they&#8217;ve got a brand-new puppet in the White House (and I&#8217;m not sure it would be John McCain; he drinks the Kool-Aid, but I think in the end, he&#8217;d be too capable of independent thought for them to control him consistently), they&#8217;ve already got legislation in place to give him, and through him, them, the power of a king.  Same old administration, brand new puppety figurehead.</p>
<p>So don&#8217;t worry.  I mean, yeah, we&#8217;re screwed, but it&#8217;s not going to happen like you&#8217;re thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RubDMC</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83723</link>
		<dc:creator>RubDMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 08:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83723</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Laura Bush wonâ€™t let the cocksucker stay.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Why not? Sure let&#039;s &lt;i&gt;her&lt;/i&gt; off the hook...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Laura Bush wonâ€™t let the cocksucker stay.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Why not? Sure let&#8217;s <i>her</i> off the hook&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83716</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 06:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3930.html#comment-83716</guid>
		<description>Laura Bush won&#039;t let the cocksucker stay. She&#039;s already close to a nervous breakdown &quot;wandering the halls demanding Rumsfeld&#039;s resignation.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura Bush won&#8217;t let the cocksucker stay. She&#8217;s already close to a nervous breakdown &#8220;wandering the halls demanding Rumsfeld&#8217;s resignation.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

