<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well, That Makes Sense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ad</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-110703</link>
		<dc:creator>Ad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-110703</guid>
		<description>Awesome. A website for another group of ignoramouses who have totally convinced themselves that they have the entire world and everything firgured out. Wonderful... just what humanity needs. I mainly oppose right wing mentality and I still think your commentary to my life is imbecilic. I&#039;m not saying that you&#039;re wrong in doing this or setting this site up, but your group is mainly comprised of mudslingers and hypercritics. 

Don&#039;t respond to this, just think about it. 

Oh and the email is real and more than open for debate. Of course, I spend the majority of my time in the physical world, actually SOLVING problems and helping those around me instead of lurking on chatrooms and message boards with nothing better to do than mindlessly derogate other people; people who I will never look in the eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. A website for another group of ignoramouses who have totally convinced themselves that they have the entire world and everything firgured out. Wonderful&#8230; just what humanity needs. I mainly oppose right wing mentality and I still think your commentary to my life is imbecilic. I&#8217;m not saying that you&#8217;re wrong in doing this or setting this site up, but your group is mainly comprised of mudslingers and hypercritics. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t respond to this, just think about it. </p>
<p>Oh and the email is real and more than open for debate. Of course, I spend the majority of my time in the physical world, actually SOLVING problems and helping those around me instead of lurking on chatrooms and message boards with nothing better to do than mindlessly derogate other people; people who I will never look in the eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanna</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-84224</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-84224</guid>
		<description>Actually, if you want one resolvable problem that the whole world faces and that has ramifications for every individual on it, overpopulation would certainly qualify.

And if your most available and cheapest remedy exists in your military capacity for demand destruction--i.e., killing humans as quickly and thoroughly as possible--why let all that capacity sit there on the bases and in the silos and laboratories?

Think of it: problems of pollution, soil degradation, deforestation, water shortages, elimination of animal habitats, etc., etc., can be greatly reduced, if not eliminated, killing all the people, or 99.995 percent of them.  You don&#039;t even need nukes to achieve this.

The biggest question for the Kissinger Man is tactical and logistical, not moral.  It&#039;s NEVER a question of morality as cultures or religious teachings describe it.  Survival for the greatest number, or benefit thereto, is not on the table.  Only the survival of the best-supplied and best-armed matters.

As a country the US is now on the destroying end; the smaller cabal that I personally call BushCo has no loyalty to people born in this country who look rather like them and were raised in the same geographic location and in the same basic culture.  

Once the American citizenry becomes a logistical and tactical problem, it&#039;s just so much meat in the way of the tanks.  What&#039;s been aimed at Vietnamese, Afghanis, Iraqis, and countless other non-Americans over the centuries will then be aimed at pesky patriots waving a piece of paper and talking about the rule of law.  

Kent States everywhere.  Many Philly fires and South L.A.s and Liberty City events.  People mowed down faster than their friends can haul them away. That&#039;ll do it.  Americans will have the white chemise of their civil virginity rudely ripped away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, if you want one resolvable problem that the whole world faces and that has ramifications for every individual on it, overpopulation would certainly qualify.</p>
<p>And if your most available and cheapest remedy exists in your military capacity for demand destruction&#8211;i.e., killing humans as quickly and thoroughly as possible&#8211;why let all that capacity sit there on the bases and in the silos and laboratories?</p>
<p>Think of it: problems of pollution, soil degradation, deforestation, water shortages, elimination of animal habitats, etc., etc., can be greatly reduced, if not eliminated, killing all the people, or 99.995 percent of them.  You don&#8217;t even need nukes to achieve this.</p>
<p>The biggest question for the Kissinger Man is tactical and logistical, not moral.  It&#8217;s NEVER a question of morality as cultures or religious teachings describe it.  Survival for the greatest number, or benefit thereto, is not on the table.  Only the survival of the best-supplied and best-armed matters.</p>
<p>As a country the US is now on the destroying end; the smaller cabal that I personally call BushCo has no loyalty to people born in this country who look rather like them and were raised in the same geographic location and in the same basic culture.  </p>
<p>Once the American citizenry becomes a logistical and tactical problem, it&#8217;s just so much meat in the way of the tanks.  What&#8217;s been aimed at Vietnamese, Afghanis, Iraqis, and countless other non-Americans over the centuries will then be aimed at pesky patriots waving a piece of paper and talking about the rule of law.  </p>
<p>Kent States everywhere.  Many Philly fires and South L.A.s and Liberty City events.  People mowed down faster than their friends can haul them away. That&#8217;ll do it.  Americans will have the white chemise of their civil virginity rudely ripped away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Socraticsilence</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83912</link>
		<dc:creator>Socraticsilence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83912</guid>
		<description>So, am I the only one amused at the thought of Kissinger trying to explain things to Bush?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, am I the only one amused at the thought of Kissinger trying to explain things to Bush?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdhatter</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83572</link>
		<dc:creator>mdhatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83572</guid>
		<description>Mary Jones -  &quot;Given that a number of Wrightâ€™s buildings are apparently falling apart, you were actually right the first time.&quot;

touchÃ©.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary Jones &#8211;  &#8220;Given that a number of Wrightâ€™s buildings are apparently falling apart, you were actually right the first time.&#8221;</p>
<p>touchÃ©.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Col. Klink</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83570</link>
		<dc:creator>Col. Klink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83570</guid>
		<description>Give poor Henry a break, so he lost the Vietnam War - I&#039;m sure he&#039;ll do much better with Iraq this time around. Oh&#039; wait...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give poor Henry a break, so he lost the Vietnam War &#8211; I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;ll do much better with Iraq this time around. Oh&#8217; wait&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herr doktor bimler</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83559</link>
		<dc:creator>herr doktor bimler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83559</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;knaverupe said,
Why doesnâ€™t Mark Foley use bookmarks?&lt;/i&gt;

We should forgive Foley&#039;s misdeeds. We should give every sinner the chance to find Jesus and reform. Foley has turned over a new leaf...

...Starting at the bottom of the page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>knaverupe said,<br />
Why doesnâ€™t Mark Foley use bookmarks?</i></p>
<p>We should forgive Foley&#8217;s misdeeds. We should give every sinner the chance to find Jesus and reform. Foley has turned over a new leaf&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;Starting at the bottom of the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACG</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83549</link>
		<dc:creator>ACG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83549</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Oh, letâ€™s go full-Godwin.&lt;/i&gt;

No worries.  Godwin&#039;s Law was repealed Thursday evening around 6:30 Eastern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Oh, letâ€™s go full-Godwin.</i></p>
<p>No worries.  Godwin&#8217;s Law was repealed Thursday evening around 6:30 Eastern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo's Bike Shop</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83544</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo's Bike Shop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83544</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;please please please please please let that be the real Gary. &lt;/i&gt;


I love this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>please please please please please let that be the real Gary. </i></p>
<p>I love this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knaverupe</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83534</link>
		<dc:creator>knaverupe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 04:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83534</guid>
		<description>Why doesn&#039;t Mark Foley use bookmarks?







He prefers his pages bent over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t Mark Foley use bookmarks?</p>
<p>He prefers his pages bent over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83531</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83531</guid>
		<description>Can I just say that I started a new job three weeks ago, which has pretty much taken all of my time away from doing things like, oh, watching the news, reading blogs, sleeping.  I didn&#039;t know about the bill&#039;s &lt;I&gt;existence&lt;/I&gt;, much less it&#039;s passage, until sometime tonight (Friday).

Nothing like the death of the constitution to put a damper on my weekend.

&lt;I&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mala.bc.ca/~Johnstoi/aristophanes/clouds.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;STREPSIADES:&lt;/A&gt; Iâ€™m dying a miserable death in here!
        These Corinthian crawlers keep biting me.                                                  
        gnawing on my ribs,
        slurping up my blood,
        yanking off my balls,                                                                                   
        tunneling up my arse holeâ€”
        theyâ€™re killing me!

CHORUS: Donâ€™t complain so much.

STREPSIADES: Why not? When Iâ€™ve lost my goods,
        lost the colour in my cheeks, lost my blood,
        lost my shoes, and, on top of all these troubles,                                              
        Iâ€™m here like some night watchman singing outâ€”
        it wonâ€™t be long before Iâ€™m done for.&lt;/I&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I just say that I started a new job three weeks ago, which has pretty much taken all of my time away from doing things like, oh, watching the news, reading blogs, sleeping.  I didn&#8217;t know about the bill&#8217;s <i>existence</i>, much less it&#8217;s passage, until sometime tonight (Friday).</p>
<p>Nothing like the death of the constitution to put a damper on my weekend.</p>
<p><i><a href="http://www.mala.bc.ca/~Johnstoi/aristophanes/clouds.htm" rel="nofollow">STREPSIADES:</a> Iâ€™m dying a miserable death in here!<br />
        These Corinthian crawlers keep biting me.<br />
        gnawing on my ribs,<br />
        slurping up my blood,<br />
        yanking off my balls,<br />
        tunneling up my arse holeâ€”<br />
        theyâ€™re killing me!</p>
<p>CHORUS: Donâ€™t complain so much.</p>
<p>STREPSIADES: Why not? When Iâ€™ve lost my goods,<br />
        lost the colour in my cheeks, lost my blood,<br />
        lost my shoes, and, on top of all these troubles,<br />
        Iâ€™m here like some night watchman singing outâ€”<br />
        it wonâ€™t be long before Iâ€™m done for.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian tha Texas Transplant</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83530</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian tha Texas Transplant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83530</guid>
		<description>ITTDGY, that was some funny shit...

...Mikey, these people in power are stupid worthless lazy no good goddamn freeloading SOBs retarded big mouth know it all asshole jerks oh yeah they&#039;re murdering lunatic assholes to boot.  But the people in this country don&#039;t seem to mind.  Go figure...

But hey, the Giants have a shot to knock the Dodgers out of the playoffs at least...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITTDGY, that was some funny shit&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;Mikey, these people in power are stupid worthless lazy no good goddamn freeloading SOBs retarded big mouth know it all asshole jerks oh yeah they&#8217;re murdering lunatic assholes to boot.  But the people in this country don&#8217;t seem to mind.  Go figure&#8230;</p>
<p>But hey, the Giants have a shot to knock the Dodgers out of the playoffs at least&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83529</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83529</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;His mark is as distinct as Frank Lloyd Wright, though Wright was a successful architect.&lt;/I&gt;

Given that a number of Wright&#039;s buildings are apparently falling apart, you were actually right the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>His mark is as distinct as Frank Lloyd Wright, though Wright was a successful architect.</i></p>
<p>Given that a number of Wright&#8217;s buildings are apparently falling apart, you were actually right the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ifthethunderdontgetya</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83525</link>
		<dc:creator>ifthethunderdontgetya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83525</guid>
		<description>Gary the Ruppert, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&amp;forum=132&amp;topic_id=2854462&amp;mesg_id=2854744&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; answering the doorbell&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary the Ruppert, <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&amp;forum=132&amp;topic_id=2854462&amp;mesg_id=2854744" rel="nofollow"> answering the doorbell</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdhatter</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83524</link>
		<dc:creator>mdhatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83524</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ll bet I can tie every bit of this back to Kissenger, just by saying his name. 

His mark is as distinct as Frank Lloyd Wright, though Wright was a successful architect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ll bet I can tie every bit of this back to Kissenger, just by saying his name. </p>
<p>His mark is as distinct as Frank Lloyd Wright, though Wright was a successful architect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83522</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83522</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And then bush goes on to say: â€œSee, the enemy understands what weâ€™re doing. And they donâ€™t like it. Thatâ€™s why theyâ€™re reacting the way theyâ€™re reacting.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Murdering their families, destroying their neighborhoods, obliterating their past and stealing their future?  In Bush&#039;s tiny mind, what&#039;s not to like about stuff like that?  Because, hey, it&#039;s not HIS family, his house is thoroughly protected 24/7, and that other stuff just doesn&#039;t bother his &quot;beautiful mind&quot;.   So, if the Iraqis are fighting back, it&#039;s gotta be sheer spite.  What an ungrateful bunch, after all we&#039;ve spent on them! 

That may be the heart of the whole sorry problem:  The Iraqis &lt;i&gt;&quot;understand what we&#039;re doing&quot;&lt;/i&gt;.  The man in the Oval Office who&#039;s supposed to be responsible for all of it... doesn&#039;t.   And the puppeteers behind the Oval Office occupant either don&#039;t understand, or don&#039;t care, or both.  We are sooooo f*cked, mikey... I&#039;m just glad I don&#039;t have kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And then bush goes on to say: â€œSee, the enemy understands what weâ€™re doing. And they donâ€™t like it. Thatâ€™s why theyâ€™re reacting the way theyâ€™re reacting.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Murdering their families, destroying their neighborhoods, obliterating their past and stealing their future?  In Bush&#8217;s tiny mind, what&#8217;s not to like about stuff like that?  Because, hey, it&#8217;s not HIS family, his house is thoroughly protected 24/7, and that other stuff just doesn&#8217;t bother his &#8220;beautiful mind&#8221;.   So, if the Iraqis are fighting back, it&#8217;s gotta be sheer spite.  What an ungrateful bunch, after all we&#8217;ve spent on them! </p>
<p>That may be the heart of the whole sorry problem:  The Iraqis <i>&#8220;understand what we&#8217;re doing&#8221;</i>.  The man in the Oval Office who&#8217;s supposed to be responsible for all of it&#8230; doesn&#8217;t.   And the puppeteers behind the Oval Office occupant either don&#8217;t understand, or don&#8217;t care, or both.  We are sooooo f*cked, mikey&#8230; I&#8217;m just glad I don&#8217;t have kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83517</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83517</guid>
		<description>Hey, if Gary can do it, so can I.   Bush gave a speech today.  It was filled with lies and justifications.  Nobody reads my shitty little blog, so I&#039;d like to mention a few of them here.  First, and this is the sound byte coming out of this speech, he took the path of carefully parsed speech:

He said &quot;&lt;i&gt;you do not create terrorism by fighting terrorism&lt;/i&gt;.&quot;  
This is both dishonest and stupid.  It is ENTIRELY dependent upon HOW you go about fighting terrorism.  Simple minded sot.  If you invade and occupy muslim countries, kill thousands of their people, imprison thousands more, and are generally perceived as a crusader, you OF COURSE will contribute to terrorism.  You&#039;ve created a situation where they HAVE to fight you and they have no other way to do it.  Yes, there is a way to, not fight, that&#039;s stupid, but PROTECT ourselves from terrorism without creating more.  These sadly stupid ass clowns can&#039;t figure out how to do that.

And then bush goes on to say:  &quot;&lt;i&gt;See, the enemy understands what we&#039;re doing. And they don&#039;t like it. That&#039;s why they&#039;re reacting the way they&#039;re reacting.&lt;/i&gt;

See, he wants to be a tough guy and convey the message that what we&#039;re doing is hurting them, and that&#039;s why they&#039;re fighting, and therefore we&#039;re winning.  But there&#039;s really some honesty here.  The Muslims see us invading, occupying, imprisoning and torturing their citizens.  Damn right they don&#039;t like it.  And guess what they do?  Yep, they try to kill Americans to make the horror stop.   Who could not have predicted that?  And who can believe the sad lying spin of the administration?

So let&#039;s ask ourselves one question.  Are they more likely to stop trying to kill us if we continue to occupy their nations, imprison and kill their young men and exploit their resources, or would they perhaps consider living in peace if we let them live in peace?

mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, if Gary can do it, so can I.   Bush gave a speech today.  It was filled with lies and justifications.  Nobody reads my shitty little blog, so I&#8217;d like to mention a few of them here.  First, and this is the sound byte coming out of this speech, he took the path of carefully parsed speech:</p>
<p>He said &#8220;<i>you do not create terrorism by fighting terrorism</i>.&#8221;<br />
This is both dishonest and stupid.  It is ENTIRELY dependent upon HOW you go about fighting terrorism.  Simple minded sot.  If you invade and occupy muslim countries, kill thousands of their people, imprison thousands more, and are generally perceived as a crusader, you OF COURSE will contribute to terrorism.  You&#8217;ve created a situation where they HAVE to fight you and they have no other way to do it.  Yes, there is a way to, not fight, that&#8217;s stupid, but PROTECT ourselves from terrorism without creating more.  These sadly stupid ass clowns can&#8217;t figure out how to do that.</p>
<p>And then bush goes on to say:  &#8220;<i>See, the enemy understands what we&#8217;re doing. And they don&#8217;t like it. That&#8217;s why they&#8217;re reacting the way they&#8217;re reacting.</i></p>
<p>See, he wants to be a tough guy and convey the message that what we&#8217;re doing is hurting them, and that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re fighting, and therefore we&#8217;re winning.  But there&#8217;s really some honesty here.  The Muslims see us invading, occupying, imprisoning and torturing their citizens.  Damn right they don&#8217;t like it.  And guess what they do?  Yep, they try to kill Americans to make the horror stop.   Who could not have predicted that?  And who can believe the sad lying spin of the administration?</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s ask ourselves one question.  Are they more likely to stop trying to kill us if we continue to occupy their nations, imprison and kill their young men and exploit their resources, or would they perhaps consider living in peace if we let them live in peace?</p>
<p>mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Studds</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83513</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Studds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83513</guid>
		<description>What do you give to a congressman for Christmas?
Promise him anything, but give him a page.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Page_sex_scandal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you give to a congressman for Christmas?<br />
Promise him anything, but give him a page.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Page_sex_scandal" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Page_sex_scandal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdhatter</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83512</link>
		<dc:creator>mdhatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83512</guid>
		<description>Garybot - &quot;Considering how the left wants to legalize all the things that Foley could have done, itâ€™s pretty hypocritical for them to criticize Foley.&quot;

You certainly do have your way with words. 

Most of the things he &quot;could have done&quot; ARE legal. 

Unfortunately, the things he did... maybe not so much...

So just which side are you on, Gary? Who are you defending?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garybot &#8211; &#8220;Considering how the left wants to legalize all the things that Foley could have done, itâ€™s pretty hypocritical for them to criticize Foley.&#8221;</p>
<p>You certainly do have your way with words. </p>
<p>Most of the things he &#8220;could have done&#8221; ARE legal. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, the things he did&#8230; maybe not so much&#8230;</p>
<p>So just which side are you on, Gary? Who are you defending?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahem</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83511</link>
		<dc:creator>ahem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83511</guid>
		<description>Is Ruppert posting from India (qua Kitty Harris&#039;s paid trolls) or from Congress?

But, re: Hitch. I&#039;d recommend sending him several thousand lightly used copies of &lt;i&gt;Homage to Catalonia&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Ruppert posting from India (qua Kitty Harris&#8217;s paid trolls) or from Congress?</p>
<p>But, re: Hitch. I&#8217;d recommend sending him several thousand lightly used copies of <i>Homage to Catalonia</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83510</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/3928.html#comment-83510</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Aravosis is reporting that Hastert has known about Foleyâ€™s fiddling for 11 months.

Covered it up becauseâ€¦. IOKIYAR, I guess. &lt;/i&gt;

And because &quot;Looky!  An internet pervert in your very own Congerss!&quot; is supposed to distract the FOX News viewers from a news story that might otherwise expose unwelcome details about those in control of the Oval Office.  By the Rove/Murdoch calculus, better to sacrifice one Repub congressman with a hot-button issue like pedophilia, if his sacrifice can distract Nancy Grace and the &quot;Oooh, shiny!&quot; demographic from truly dangerous revelations like those in Woodward&#039;s new book.  Especially since bottom-feeding paid trolls like Gary R can be counted on to shriek that busting a Repub for sexually harassing teenagers somehow means that Democrats are in favor of kiddy porn -- it makes no sense whatsoever, but the noise is supposed to drown out all serious discussion.  

If Hastert&#039;s really been sitting on Foley&#039;s case for 11 months, it just proves to what lengths the Repubs will go in their attempts to control and distort what Americans are allowed to know.   The assumption is that it didn&#039;t matter whether other teenagers were harassed, as long as the Repubs had a &quot;handle&quot; they could use whenever they deemed it most important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Aravosis is reporting that Hastert has known about Foleyâ€™s fiddling for 11 months.</p>
<p>Covered it up becauseâ€¦. IOKIYAR, I guess. </i></p>
<p>And because &#8220;Looky!  An internet pervert in your very own Congerss!&#8221; is supposed to distract the FOX News viewers from a news story that might otherwise expose unwelcome details about those in control of the Oval Office.  By the Rove/Murdoch calculus, better to sacrifice one Repub congressman with a hot-button issue like pedophilia, if his sacrifice can distract Nancy Grace and the &#8220;Oooh, shiny!&#8221; demographic from truly dangerous revelations like those in Woodward&#8217;s new book.  Especially since bottom-feeding paid trolls like Gary R can be counted on to shriek that busting a Repub for sexually harassing teenagers somehow means that Democrats are in favor of kiddy porn &#8212; it makes no sense whatsoever, but the noise is supposed to drown out all serious discussion.  </p>
<p>If Hastert&#8217;s really been sitting on Foley&#8217;s case for 11 months, it just proves to what lengths the Repubs will go in their attempts to control and distort what Americans are allowed to know.   The assumption is that it didn&#8217;t matter whether other teenagers were harassed, as long as the Repubs had a &#8220;handle&#8221; they could use whenever they deemed it most important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

