Isn’t it interesting that the only time we’re willing to give Africans full credit for their self-actualization is when we tsk tsk them about their backwards morality compared to our
recently enlightened asses? As if finishing the race after the kid we tripped and then shanked is some sort of incredibly accomplishment made possible only through our inherent superiority.
Charles Ajunwa interviewing Chibuihem Amalaha, This Day Live:
Science of Gay Marriage
Ah Africa, the poor dog strapped to the roof of our proverbial Western World SUV. Whether it’s colonization, enslavement, exploitation, destruction of cultures, medical experimentation, or being used as ground zero for all sorts of insane economic or religious experiments based on what the most fucked-up areality wingnuts can brew up, it can seem like the continent can’t ever seem to catch a full break and self-actualization will always be cut short by racists desperate to “prove the inferiority” of its people by sabotaging any attempts to grow and approach the 21st century while mocking how “genetically” backwards they are.
Which is all well and good, but in our defense, they are very black. And clearly such noble savages from the Dark Continent couldn’t possibly manage to say, founded civilizations, invent brain surgery robots, produce great explorers, great artists, amazing modern musicians, or great mathematicians without the gentle benign racism of white people “helping” them out.
I mean, after all, there’s an old super white proverb that goes:
Give a man a fish and he’ll become a hippie communist freeloader. Teach a man to fish and he’ll steal a job from a white person. But give a man a bible and trample him under its brutal oppression and he’ll die and go to a better place.
Which brings us to Nigeria, home of a million jokes about rich desperate princes and also 170 million people. Without the influence of corrective white influence, pre-modern Nigeria proved to be a collection of disparate groups each with their unique civilizations, such as the Nok, the Fulani Kingdom, the Ife, Oyo, the Kingdom of the Nri, and the Kingdom of Benin, just utterly failing to live up to the Empire potentials of their close neighbors and profiting of West African/North African trade, I mean lacking civilization as was the African default before enlightened white people brought “salvation”.
And by salvation, I mean, the slave trade. Lagos was a major port of call for the infamous Atlantic Triangular Slave Trade, which decimated the region as it encouraged rival tribes to deplete each other by selling each other to the slavers before losing themselves to European double-dealers. But hey, that ended… in 1936, after the country was used as one of the exotic “locales” for British upper class fuckheads to exploit for “adventure” for over a century with an endless cavalcade of bloody genocidal wars and brutal political oppression. But hey, they’ve been running themselves now… well, only since 1960 and since then there have been a series of military juntas, the last one ending in 1997. Oh and they’ve had about one single round of not-visibly corrupt elections after the obviously fixed one of 2007. Corruption that is largely owing to the high Western demand for oil deposits in the region…
Oh and as if that wasn’t enough, pretty much every Evangelical and Christian missionary religion on the planet has declared open season on the Nigerian populace since the early 20th century, with about 40-50% of the population following a bastardization of Evangelical bullshit. And being home to all the “test” missions that all the Western world’s crazies want to try out with a “good target population” they can feel all smugly superior about has just been great for Nigeria culturally and medically. What with them currently having the second largest number of people living with HIV and LGBT rights that could be described charitably as oh my fucking Bob levels.
But really without that wonderful condescending “improvement” from kindly exploitative missionary fucks, the poor Nigerian people might have been unable to come to such important scientific discoveries as today’s exemple du wingnut and instead might have wasted their time being commie pinko rabble rousers. We can only thank all-mighty white Jesus for small favors.
Verbatim Tagline (or the last port before Jungle):
- A University of Lagos post graduate student, Chibuihem Amalaha, from Imo State has used science to prove that gay marriage is improper among other breakthroughs, writes Charles Ajunwa
Clearly Nobel Peace Prize winner and prominent environmental biologist, Wangari Maathai, would be proud of the great scientific breakthroughs possible when one is “carefully” taught with only the finest of white man burdens.
His persistence during our conversations on the phone that I should give him an opportunity to explain some of his scientific breakthroughs made me to agree to meet him at his residence at No.38 Godwin Way, Ireakari Estate, Isolo, Lagos. With a disarming smile on his face, he introduced himself as Chibuihem Stanley Amalaha, a student of University of Lagos studying Chemical Engineering at the School of Post Graduate Studies. He talked about his researches and scientific breakthroughs with the confidence of an achiever. First, he let the reporter into his background.
Oh puff pieces. Always terribly introduced, no matter where you are in the world. C’mon journalists, you’re going for an interview, not a date.
“I was the first to publish report about the 2006 total solar eclipse in the newspaper in Nigeria when I was writing for the defunct New Age newspaper.
I also reported the true situation about the 2010 acid rain in Nigeria. I carried out analysis and found out that there was nothing like cancer of the skin attributed to the acid rain and by 2011, I emerged the best science reporter in Nigeria where I won Nigeria Media Merit Award in the energy category as a science editor with Compass newspapers.”
You know those various “think tank” academics, the idiots with a few academic fancy titles to their name who can be trusted to regurgitate the usual oil shill bottom-line bullshit or newest faux-scientific religious batshittery? Yeah, that’s an international franchise and just as maddeningly cookie-cutter everywhere it crops up. Also, Sadly, No!
He continued: “Ever since then I have been doing a lot of researches in the country. There are many discoveries and inventions I have made in science and technology.
A note from a scientist tired of various bullshit shills pretending to be a scienamatist in order to make their self-serving bullshit seem academic. If someone starts taking about their research and doesn’t immediately babbling on about some obscure microfocus in an animated tone, then they are not a fucking scientist. Scientists are genetically incapable of talking about their research without starting to reveal the half-crazed down-the-rabbit-hole mentality that enables one to spend months on end hunched over microscopes and pipetting arrays without going on a homicidal rampage… And you have no idea how hard it is not to start talking about mitochondrial free radical effects on telomere length in-
(Nerd Alert Silencing Protocol Enabled, returning after rant in 3…2…1…)
And that actually reduces potential maximum life spans by a FULL HALF at least and… ah, sorry about that. I seem to have gone to my geek place for a while there.
I have also been able to prove that the mathematical symbol pi which people thought of as 22 over 7 is not actually 22 over , but rather a transcendental number while 22 over 7 is a rational number.
Holy shit, this was YOU?!? Fuck, I should have been able to tell what with your monocle and the fact that you are a late 19th century German mathematician.
I also proved that watching television in the dark impacts negatively on one’s eyes and by God’s grace, I was the first person to use scientific instruments to prove it in the whole world. The Nigerian Television Authority (NTA) featured me on this in one of their programmes on January 12, 2013, where I demonstrated to millions of their viewers that watching television in the dark damages the eyes. Usually when it’s around 10pm, many families in Nigeria will switch off their surrounding lights to use the light from television or the light from computer alone thinking that they will see images brighter. But from experiments I found that it’s not true and experts both at the University of Lagos and elsewhere have found my work to be true. The reason for this is because there is a lot of difference in illuminants (brightness) between the television screen and the dark background in the room known as the periphery,” Amalaha said.
You know that running joke in the Star Trek movies of Chekov explaining how some great scientific or mathematic discovery was actually done by Soviet scientists and then Kirk or Spock would roll their eyes and humor him?
I think this might be the Dunning-Kruger version of that.
The Wrong Act of Gay Marriage
Ha, silly queers, it’s not a gay “right”. It’s a gay wrong. Boom, time to quit my day job and go into terrible late night stand-up.
Then, he zeroed in on his research about gay marriage.
Ooh, did it also involve “scientific instruments”? I just love fake “research” pretending to be genuine academic scholarship. Wait, not love, what’s the word again? Oh right, loathe. I’m absolutely in loathe with it and want it to have all of my hate babies.
He said: “In recent time I found that gay marriage,which is homosexuality and lesbianism, is eating deep into the fabric of our human nature all over the world and this was why nations of Sodom and Gomora were destroyed by God because they were into gay practice. That is, a man marrying another man and a woman marrying another woman.
And lo, God looked down and saw a man in a suit, next to another man in the suit as they chastely kissed in front of the Justice of the Peace and though His Hallowed Breeches grew tight and breathing labored, He did thus spoke, Ew. And so the ground was split asunder and man and woman and child cast from his grace into the eternal burning Standard Abuse Tactic Casual Threat and Mankind did accept her chastisement and never again stumble onto His Holy Bookmarks or question about the All Sainted Credit Card Charges to HotMaleStuds.com. Amen.
“A recent publication on May 3, 2013 shows that France is the 14th country in the world that have legalised gay. I asked myself why should a man be marrying a man and a woman marrying a woman, does it mean that there is no more female for a man to marry or there is no more male for a woman to marry? And recently, Britain told Nigeria to legalise gay marriage of forfeit international aid. I thank God for our lawmakers who refused to sign the bill legalising gay marriage. And so God gave me the wisdom to use science as a scientist to prove gay marriage wrong.
Because apparently God had nothing better to do than that. Nope, nothing about say, the HIV crisis in the country, or the continued sectarian violence, or the various civil wars. Nope, all His time teaching an oil shill hack to use science to double plus science test tube Jesus.
… Yanno, wingnut evangelicals, your God is kind of a micromanaging dick. I think I’m going to just stick with the cult of Elaine Belloc instead, if it’s all right by you. And may Mona protect the hedgehogs always, Amen!
“In the area of physics, I used physics with experiments, I used chemistry with experiments, I used biology with experiments and I used mathematics to prove gay marriage wrong.
Whoa! Experiments?!? Shit. I mean, usually, I might suspect that this was about to lead into some tired rehashing of ignorant shit that every penny-ante religious nutjob tries to trot out when they think they’ve “got” those tricksy scienamatists of the Global Homosexual Jihad, but fuck, this is time-traveling German Scientist Guy. And he like used multiple scientists like with experiments and shit, fuck, he probably pulled some nth dimensional test tube shit that will like blow our brains like whoa, dude. Oh yeah, I said it, like whoa dude. Not just whoa. We’re on a whole new level is what I’m saying.
I’m gonna have to ramp up my Scienification and Truthiness if I’m gonna step to what is about to be thrown down.
The Physics of Gay Marriage
“To start with, physics is one of the most fundamentals of all the sciences
Oh, he is bringing it right down to the fundamentals. There just ain’t no response to be made. Checkmate liberals. Check and mate.
and I used two bar magnets in my research.
Ah, fuck, we’ve got magnets and shit all up in here? That’s just not right. I mean, no one fucking knows how that shit works!
A bar magnet is a horizontal magnet that has the North Pole and the South Pole and when you bring two bar magnets and you bring the North Pole together you find that the two North Poles will not attract. They will repel, that is, they will push away themselves showing that a man should not attract a man. If you bring two South Poles together you find that the two South Poles will not attract indicating that same sex marriage should not hold. A female should not attract a female as South Pole of a magnet does not attract the South Pole of a magnet. But, when you bring a North Pole of a magnet and a South Pole of a magnet they will attract because they are not the same, indicating that a man will attract a woman because of the way nature has made a female.
Which is why, every single person has one side of themselves that is “female” and another “male”, exhibiting the two poles like some horrific Mannequin creature from Silent Hill 2… wait, no, oh, I get it, they’re back to back like the 4-legged creature in the Origin of Love song from Hedgwig and the Angry Inch… Uh… everyone is intersex?
Oh, silly me, clearly I’m forgetting that magnets are independently either south pole or north pole. And certainly there aren’t magnets who can switch back and forth with what they attract to, bisexual style and… Wait, this raises an even more important question! What about electromagnetism?
If I’m in bed sandwiched between my two South Pole girlfriends and I start slowly spinning between them to show them both cuddle affection, do I become an electrical generator? And does this mean that queer threesomes are absolutely critical for the creation of our modern electrical grid?
Even in physics when you study what is called electrostatics, you found that when you rub particles together they don’t attract each other but when you rub particle in another medium they will attract each other. For example, if you use your biro and rub it on your hair, after rubbing, try to bring small pieces of paper they will attract because one is charged while the other one is not charged. But if both of them are charged they don’t attract, which means that man cannot attract another man because they are the same, and a woman should not attract a woman because they are the same. That is how I used physics to prove gay marriage wrong.
But wait, men and women aren’t really different mediums. I mean, it’s not like men are some alien lifeform from Planet Douchebro incapable of producing viable offspring with normal Earth females. Really, the case is better made that people in general should never “rub” each other and instead stick with things much more different than them in order to form proper electrostatic charge. Like barnyard animals or farm equipment (which reminds me, what is Don Surber up to these days?). Wait, no, ideally it’s something that can easily deliver a “charge”. Electrical equipment is especially good for this. And what is the electrical equipment most likely used to “rub” on people?
Really, if people insist on going against God’s will by refusing to be monogamous with their vibrators, then we really have no one to blame but ourselves. King Physics decrees it so!
I mean, sure, you may think that there are plenty of people experiencing genuine sexual and romantic attractions to the same gender or a different gender, because we are not actually all aromantic asexuals (woot to those who are, though, you deserve a shoutout from time to time). And that plenty of people get a good “charge” out of rubbing their fleshy bits against each other in that strange way you sexuals are so fond of doing. But that’s only because you aren’t a time-traveling triple-crown winning black-belt Physicist like this guy.
The Chemistry of Gay Marriage
“In chemistry, I used chemical reactions and we have different types of chemical reactions. We have double decomposition reaction, decomposition reaction, neutralisation reaction and reduction oxidation reaction.
Ah shit man, look at all those reactions. You can’t find those outside of… like a light perusal of a basic level chemistry book and shit. And all the experiments, they’re like off the hook, full of tables and complicated assays and not just pointing to some half-assed C-grade regurgitations of intro level shit as if you just found the Theory of Everything.
But in chemistry I used a simple one known as neutralisation reaction which is a reaction where an acid reacts with a base to give you salt and water. For example, when you bring surphuric acid and you reacts it with sodium hydroxide which is a base you are going to have salt and water. That tells you that the acid is a different body, the base is a different body and they will react
Sooo, what you’re saying is that when heterosexuals “react” they form a brief violent row, a salty unpalatable mess, and leaves everyone involved completely agendered… wait what?
But if you bring an acid and you pour it on top of an acid chemistry there will be no reaction. If you bring water and pour it on top it shows that there will be no reaction.
If you bring a base either sodium hydroxide and you pour it on top of a sodium hydroxide you find out that there will be reaction showing that a man on top of a man will have no reaction. A woman on top of a woman will have no reaction, that is what chemistry is showing.
That may be what “chemistry” is showing, but I’m pretty sure the world’s porn supply not only shows that putting a man on top of a man or a woman on top of a woman will get plenty of “reactions”. It’s almost like ancient Evangelical myths about how “science” proves that men and women always complement each other and so must be relegated to 1950s gender norms have little to do with reality… No, mustn’t disbelieve polymath supergenius…
Even in chemistry when you also use a process called electrolysis, which is if you use electrolysis of acidilated water, that is water you drop some droplets of acid on it, you found that the negative ions will be attracted to the positive ones while the positive ions will be attracted to the negative ones. So the negative ones are not attracted to their peers, they are all attracted to the positive electrode and the positive ones are not attracted to the positive electrode. Instead, the negative ion is attracted to positive electrodes and why is it that the negative is attracted to the positive? It is because they are not the same. Likewise a man cannot be attracted to a man as negative ion is not attracted to the negative electrode instead negative ion is attracted to the positive electrode. That is what electrolysis is showing us that gay marriage is wrong in the area of chemistry.
But wait, positive ions can totes be smashed all up with each other if they have some neutral pals to keep them separated. Just look at neutrons and protons in the nucleus. So, it seems that negative ions can have fun chasing after each other and positive ions can be all cool showering together as long as there’s a good non-gendered person in the threesome to keep shit from getting all high drama, nuclear reaction everywhere.
I mean, really, with the electrical generator example and now this, you are making more of a case for queer poly families than anything else. I mean, they seem to be the only things with staying power to make it through the long term. Heterosexuals are just too prone to breaking apart or reacting violently with other ions all the time. I mean, if we’re arguing stability here for the little ion children, well… I’m afraid the “science” is clear.
The Biology of Gay Marriage
Oooh, yay! It’s biology! Ooh, I want to guess his “experiment” this time.
Hmmm… based on his monomaniacal focus, I’m going to go with “penis no can enter penis” (docking, sounding, or frottage, what are they?) and hurdy durr “vagina no can be penetrated by vagina” (me no ever heard of tribbing or scissoring).
Overall though, I imagine this will be the greatest train wreck of them all. I mean, biology is where we actually encounter actual people and actual animals and the messy kinky sex they have with each other in ways that make the baby Jesus cry. All that infinite variation and spectrum of gender and sexuality for all to see. It’s not like in chemistry or physics where it’s all abstract metaphors and you can pretend that people are acids and bases and have set predetermined reaction patterns under the same stimulae.
“In biology, I used simple experiments and I came down to a lay man.
Oh, my. (/George Takei)
We have seen that the female of a fowl is called hen and the male of a fowl is called a cock.
Ummm… if this starts breaking out into a rendition of What Does the Fox Say, I’m not sure that’s a compelling case for queer people being non-existing.
P.S. I gotta love how this was supposed to be a proof of how gay marriage is somehow “scientifically wrong” and instead has mostly been trying to prove that is physically impossible (as in against the very laws of physics and ions) to be attracted to the same sex or even engage in sex with the same gender. I’m pretty sure if it were completely impossible for people to be gay, then the wingnuts would have one less thing to feel “inherently” superior about and there would be no need for long sciency proofs of how “impossible” it is to have gay sex.
We have never seen where a cock is having sex with a cock
… Fuck it, I’m still counting it.
and we have never seen where a hen is having sex with another. Even among lions when you go to the zoo you find out that lion does not mate with a lion instead a lion will mate with a lioness showing that a lion being a male will mate with lioness being a female.
Heh. Heeheehee. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Uh, yeah, totes, dude, animals never have gay sex. Nope, never. I mean, for fuck’s sake dude, I know there’s been this long movement of politely glossing over all the queer orgies that animals get up to, but there’s denialism and then there’s just putting your fingers in your ears and yelling that you can’t hear the sound the bonobos are making when they are “grooming”.
Oh and to answer your initial fail, yes, Virginia, there are gay chickens. There are even transgender chickens. And asexual sheep. All that messy “unique” variation we see in humans is just as visible in the animal kingdom when we take our heads out of our asses and actually look for ourselves. Every last bit. If fluberts existed outside this blog, then you can bet your ass that my next link would be to flubert bat specimens.
Maybe it’s time you learned to deal with it. And that goes double for all the rest of you ignorant God-stalkers out there.
Now if animals that are of even lower creature understand so much, how come human being made in the higher image of God that is even of higher creature will be thinking of a man having sex with another and woman having sex with another woman?
Oh, if only he was actually competent at biology, maybe he could have avoided this delicious mouthful of irony. But he wasn’t and so we get to just savor it. Mmm mmm, that’s good own goal.
That shows that it’s a misnomer and when you come to real biological standard, when you see a lady you love there is what is called the follicle stimulating hormone. The follicle stimulating hormone in a man triggers what is called spermatogenesis through your brain which is called hypothalamus.
Uh huh. Yes, “men”, i.e. cis men when they see a lady (cis or trans* status indeterminate as of yet) that they love, only then start producing sperm and only in reaction to the “woman” they love. Not say, a routine creation that is hardly mercurial, but rather follows a set cycle that does not care if you are homosexual, bisexual, pansexual, heterosexual, single target, or asexual. I’m pretty sure there are aromantic hermits who have never fallen in love and will never fall in love who nonetheless still fall prey to the cycles that many of us are bound to.
But hey, maybe I’m wrong and this is part of the same magic sperm generation powers that reads how manly a man you are to decide whether or not you’ll have sons or not.
It will send message to your brain when you see a lady you love and through the hypothalamus you will go after the lady. And it will trigger your spermatogenesis and the lady’s host follicles stimulating hormone will be triggered by the hypothalamus and it will stimulate her ovarian follicle. So in the man is the spermatogenesis, in female it’s the ovarian follicle.
Oh joy, we’re exporting our evo-psych nonsense overseas too. I can’t tell you how overjoyed I am to see that anti-science bullshit spreading around the globe.
You find out that the sperm alone does not produce a child and the ovary alone in the female does not produce a child. They need each other for reproduction to occur and the follicle stimulating hormone in the man and that of the female promote different things. The sperm in the man alone doesn’t produce a child and ovary in the female alone does not produce a child, they need each other for reproduction to occur. So that shows how biology proves that gay marriage is wrong.
And of course this argument again. Because every single homophobe on the planet circles back to this argument when all their various other “attempts” to secularize raw religious antipathy fail. Because apparently reproduction is the be all, end all of relationships every where, even though plenty of cis/straight monogamous, sex in missionary position no more than once a week types have no intention of reproducing in the course of their marriages. Even though we don’t forcibly divorce people when one of them gets their tubes tied or fits in an IUD or is determined to be infertile or simply grows up and gets old. Even though there is no end to queer relationships that are fully capable of reproducing. Even though there are no end to 100% straight relationships that are physically incapable of ever reproducing.
Even though we have too damn many people on this planet already and too damn many kids who are unwanted and need homes, love, and support and the last thing we need is a bunch of religious fucktards continuing to overpopulate our resource-starved planet out of some fealty to “proving heterosexuality” through the unloving creation of a child who will be neglected and treated as nothing more than a tool and a possession.
Because they really have nothing else and they don’t really have this either. And our brands of wingnuts can sell it overseas and rejoice that at least they can convince their targets there to keep their gravy train alive a couple more decades, but it won’t change the trend. It won’t change reality.
And most of all, it won’t change love.
The Mathematics of Gay Marriage
Gays + Marriage = Rise of the Antichrist?
In mathematics which is another core area of science, I used what is called the principle of commutativity and idepotency. Commutativity in mathematics is simply the arrangement of numbers or arrangement of letters in which the way you arrange them don’t matter. For example, if you say A + B in mathematics you are going to have B + A. For example, if I say two plus three it will give five. If I start from three, I say three plus two it also give you five showing that two plus three and three plus two are commutative because they gave the same results.
Yes, I know. I was just teaching that concept to a Seventh Grader earlier this week. You are in grad school. Grow your arguments the fuck up, already.
That shows that A + B will give you B + A, you see that there is a change.
Uh, no there really isn’t. That’s sort of the point of the proof. They are one and the same and there isn’t a real change if you go from A + B to B + A… which if we’re going where I think we’re going means there is no real difference if you put the man in front or the woman in front. Whichever way the strap-on goes, it’s all the same.
In A + B, A started the journey while in B + A, B started the journey. If we use A as a man and use B as a woman we are going to have B + A that is woman and man showing that there is a reaction. A + B reacted, they interchanged and gave us B + A showing that commutativity obeys that a man should not marry a man and a woman should not marry a woman.
… I think I just became dumber for having read that. Um, the fuck? Reactions, we’re still on chemistry and the amorphous, undefined “reactions”. With fucking math. Math doesn’t really “react”. 1+5 doesn’t react into 6. It’s not like the 1 and 5 particles fuse to form an equivalent molar volume of 6 particles.
And I have no idea how even in your logic you jumped from man and woman equals man and woman therefore no fags. I mean, at best, you’ve proved a good argument for feminism as it doesn’t really change the love in a relationship of A and B and how they react if the man or woman is the one to take charge. Neither loses anything, mathematically speaking.
If you use idempotency, it’s a reaction in mathematics where A + A = A.
Uh… no. Just no.
Actually in abstract algebra, A + A =2A
“Abstract” algebra? You mean, like algebra. Or any form of math on the planet. For fuck’s sake man, I hate proofs as much as the next person forced to do them, but I’m pretty sure debugging an equation where A=0 or its equivalent problem was like example one on why we were supposed to pretend to care.
but we are less concerned with the numerical value two. We are more less concerned with the symbols A, you find out that A + A will give you A showing that the whole thing goes unchanged. It didn’t change unlike commutativity A + B give B + A there is a change. A started the journey in commutativity and A + B gave us B + A and B started the journey after the equality sign. But in the case of idempotency A + A will give you A showing that it goes unreacted. You started with A and you meet A ,the final result is A. Showing that a man meeting a man A + A will produce a man there is no reaction, it goes unreacted and in chemical engineering you have to send the material back to the reactor for the action to be carried out again showing that it goes unreacted. That is how mathematics has shown that gay marriage is wrong because commutativity proves that gay marriage is wrong. Idempotency also proves that gay marriage is wrong. So these are the principles I have used to prove gay marriage wrong in physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics and by the grace of God I am the only one that has proved this in the whole world.
Uh huh… So basically, if you ignore how math works then you can avoid acknowledging that a man and a woman is just that, a man and a woman. And a man and a man is just that, two men, and so on and so forth. A genderqueer person, a transman, an agendered asexual, a cismale transvestite, and an intersex sub are just that as well, themselves, combined, together.
That’s… so… BRILLIANT!
I mean, it’s such a perfect demonstration of the intentional myopia of homophobia and sexism and how it turns a blind eye to reality and the way people are in order to justify beliefs that literally cannot be reconciled with how reality works at its core. Willing to deny the very way the fundamentals of our understanding of the world works all while angrily screaming that they are just “defending” the “true” reality.
“If you go on the Internet to check whether there is anybody who has used physics to prove gay marriage wrong, you find out there is none. You go to Google or youtube check whether there is anybody that has used chemistry to find same sex marriage wrong, you find out there is none and the same applies to biology and mathematics.
“In general, same sex marriage is evil. It should be stopped by those practicing it. Now they are saying that they will go and adopt a child, the question is that if everybody shows interest in same sex marriage where would the child they are adopting come from?”
It is the perfect demonstration of how utterly predictable homophobia is and how the wingnut response to facts is a turtle-shell dodge hiding away from a reality that is literally shouting at them past their cognitive dissonance. And how they will gladly turn a blind eye to literally erase connections of love and sexual attraction in order to justify the unjustifiable and believe in a reality that never was. Man + Man in love is treated as nothing. Love is treated as artificially absent or segregated or dependent on meaningless gender roles that have never been anything more than bullshit and habit.
It’s only a shame that the author’s country of origin will overshadow how universal this shit really is and it will more likely play out as an “African is ignorant bigot” story than an illumination of how bigotry leads to the psychotic break from reality we are seeing in so many wingnuts.
And now his works have earned him the respect in the world of science. He said: “At the University of Lagos where I currently study as a student you will find my publication on the notice board there. When you go to the Senate Building of the university you will see the same notice there and even recently my lecturer at the Department of Chemical Engineering, Profesor D.S.Aribuike pointedly told me that I will win Nobel prize one day, because he found that my works are real and nobody has done it in any part of the world. You know Nobel Prize is the highest award anyone could ever win and no African has won Nobel Prize in science. So I am aspiring to win Nobel Prize for Africa. Other universities have seen my work and sent me commendations. I have a professor friend who has seen the work I did and he sent me congratulatory message because of the originality of the work.”
Not only that, Dr. Henry Boyo, Department of Physics at UNILAG approved of him. He said: “I have known him (Stanley) for the past five years. He is a very sound guy. He is genuine in terms of his scientific discoveries. He has appeared on NTA and SilverBird televisions where he demonstrated his knowledge of science. When you talk to him, you will know that he understands what he is talking about. He is convincing.
“He conceptualised the idea of using sciences and mathematics to prove gay marriage wrong and we have worked it here. Some people make claims to religion but he went a step further to use science and mathematics to prove gay marriage wrong. He used my laboratory here (UNILAG) to carry out his researches. He is the originator of the idea, he deserves commendation and we support the idea. You can quote me anywhere, the guy’s concept is germane and it has been scientifically proven to be true.”
His Next Step
“I want to be able to publish it in international journals. The finance has been a problem in this area because I found out that you you have to pay in dollars for international journals to publish you. You know finance is a factor and I don’t have money to start paying in US dollars and I need sponsors so that I can pay for the journals to be published.”
And who knows, perhaps you could have been an Ahmed Zewail or a Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, if you were willing like them to observe the world you lived in and actually do something real and new instead of serve as a convenient fool for the ignorant throw-up a sick and dying religion decided to make your daily gruel.
But sadly, no, you aren’t.
‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. You have no idea how much I’m crossing my fingers that this thread doesn’t just devolve into a LOL Africa iz dum failapalooza. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™