Aug
8

Why Do The Effing Homos Keep Saying I’m Homophobic?




Posted at 23:34 by Tintin


ABOVE: Karen Norling

Shorter Karen Norling, The American Genius
Am I A ‘Homophobe’?

  • Some of my best friends are fucking faggots.

This is apparently homophobia month here at Sadly, No!, and our next guest after Trevor Thomas who wants to make it clear that she isn’t a homophobe either is Karen Norling. Karen is claiming to have four — count ‘em! four!! — gay friends. More importantly, she is claiming that having these friends means that she can can’t be a homophobe even though she would like homosexuality to be wiped off the face of the earth (in a loving fashion, of course). Similarly, by that line of reasoning, I was (during my rural childhood) friendly with a few pigs and cows which means that I can eat them without being called a carnivore. Indeed, because of that close association, I am uniquely entitled to call myself a vegan while scarfing down a bacon blue cheese burger. Wow, is that great or what??

Of course, the fact that [these four friends] are homosexuals would mean nothing to you — if not for the following fact: I am utterly, 100% opposed to homosexuality. I not only think it’s unnatural, but I think it’s morally wrong, and the thought of it repulses me.

Somehow I get the feeling that we may be talking about imaginary friends here.

If you think my “disavowal” renders me a “homophobe” — think again. I may be at odds with homosexuality, but I am not afraid of it.

Now where have we heard that before? How has this become the meme du jour? Unless gays scare the piss out of you, you can freely hate them, deprive them of equal rights, call them names, express revulsion in their presence, and stuff a greasy fried chicken sandwich down your throat to get back at the gays and not be homophobic. It’s like John Derbyshire claiming not to be racist because he once bought a box of Uncle Ben’s Converted Rice.

Today I am extremely happy, totally satisfied with the man I married nearly 20 years ago. I mention I’m happy and satisfied because it’s apparent that those of you who make liberal use of the terms “homophobia,” “homophobic,” and “homophobe” are trying to imply not only that we who oppose homosexuality are mean, hateful, unenlightened, narrow-minded clods — but also that we’re denying ourselves infinite pleasure and fulfillment — all because we choose to have sex solely with members of the opposite sex.

Oh, for Liberace’s sake, no one, repeat, no one is calling you homophobic because you don’t want to engage in gay sex. We’re calling you homophobic because you don’t want other people to engage in gay sex. We’re calling you homophobic because you want people who engage in gay sex to have less rights. We’re calling you a homophobe because the very next thing you said was this:

By frequently employing such terms, you merely sabotage your efforts to make certain that homosexuality is ultimately sanctioned by those of us who would strike it from existence if we could.

No, wanting to wipe gays from the face of the earth isn’t homophobic at all. And, just a thought here, have you told your “friends,” I mean, assuming that they are real, that you would like to strike homosexuality from existence if you could? Because, if you had — and this is just a thought — I doubt that they would be your friends for much longer.

Oh, and one more thing. Even though this was just published today by the American “Thinker,” Norling is simply recycling this — word for word and without any attribution — from a column she posted at Porno Pete LaBarbera’s site back in November 2011. Not that, of course, such dishonesty would suggest that she totally made up these four extremely dear friends who she also thinks are repulsive, immoral perverts.

355 Comments »

  1. Hogeye Grex said,

    August 8, 2012 at 23:56

    What do you mean, “I don’t get to tell everybody else what to do with their fiddly bits?”

    You’re infringing on my religious freedoms!!!!!

  2. Nym said,

    August 8, 2012 at 23:58

    I was reminded of this little blast from the past:

    “I have piles and piles of black friends. They come to my home, I marry them, they use my bathroom. I treat them just like everyone else.” — Keith Bardwell.

    Remember him?

  3. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:04

    The Reaper.

  4. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:04

    Whoops, sorry for off-topicking so quick.

  5. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:06

    Certainly repulsion has nothing to do with fear.

  6. BeccaM said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:09

    Open letter–

    Dear Ms. Norling,

    Either those four gay people are not actually ‘friends’ in the traditional sense — in that you accept them as they are, without wishing to change a single thing about them. Or, in the words of the immortal Inigo Montoya, “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”

    Even money you’ve never sent that one ‘friend’ any of your essays saying you want to wipe homosexuality off the face of the planet.

    Kissies (air-only, of course, because I don’t know where else that mouth of yours has been),
    B.

  7. wiley said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:14

    It’s all about them isn’t it?

  8. R. Porrofatto said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:19

    So the problem isn’t hatred of gay people, it’s just that we need a word whose root origins clearly mean hatred of homosexuals. Only then can these people can correctly identify themselves. Hmm. Missodomy? Homostility? Anhomosity? Homodium? As in, “Her writing displayed the severe homodium of a typical missodomist.”

    Fuck it. I’ll stick with sociopathic hatemongering bigot. Works for me.

  9. vacuumslayer said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:20

    to have “fewer” rights

  10. vacuumslayer said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:21

    omg, the new Firefox sucks wingnut balls. Through a truck stop glory hole.

  11. Smut Clyde said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:23

    The Reaper.
    Running-mate advice from Rich Lowry, who has been so dependably right in the past.

  12. vacuumslayer said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:24

    Does Paul Ryan make Rich Lowry starburst in his pants?

  13. Alexander von Humbug said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:24

    Voices in her head — I think she just watched too much Queer Eye and hallucinates that four of the five are actually her friends. She wrote Ted Allen out of the delusion because … that cake, oh, that cake.

  14. jim x said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:29

    OMG what unreal boolean ‘thinking’!

    By frequently employing such terms, you merely sabotage your efforts to make certain that homosexuality is ultimately sanctioned by those of us who would strike it from existence if we could.

    So there is no middle ground of even *acknowledging* people have a right to do something you don’t like.

    Either you are advocating for it to be stricken from existence OR you are trying to convince people they should *approve* it.

    THere isn’t even the room to admit that homosexuality simply exists **whether or not** people approve of it or not.

    At its base, this is quite enlightening. The unworkable logic shows it’s a poor rationalization that reveals it’s roots: “I don’t like it so you should stop it and you can’t change my mind because I don’t like it so you should….”

  15. Cole said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:29

    “By frequently employing such terms, you merely sabotage your efforts to make certain that homosexuality is ultimately sanctioned by those of us who would strike it from existence if we could.”

    Or, translated from the old-fashioned German:

    “You Jews would have an easier time convincing us to stop persecuting and murdering you, if you’d only stop calling us Nazis.”

  16. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:30

    omg, the new Firefox sucks wingnut balls. Through a truck stop glory hole.

    Keep rating this bug upwards please.

  17. Cole said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:31

    Homostility we have a neologism for the day. You have to pronounce it the right way, but this is a good one. I’m using it from now on.

  18. Pupienus Maximus said,

    August 9, 2012 at 0:51

    I not only think it’s unnatural, but I think it’s morally wrong, and the thought of it repulses me. And I can’t stop thinking about it, she silently added.

  19. Whale Chowder said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:01

    Oh, for Liberace’s sake, no one, repeat, no one is calling you homophobic because you don’t want to engage in gay sex. We’re calling you homophobic because you don’t want other people to engage in gay sex. We’re calling you homophobic because you want people who engage in gay sex to have less rights.

    QFT. This bigot really needs to get a grip.

  20. Oregon Beer Snob said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:12

    So the problem isn’t hatred of gay people, it’s just that we need a word whose root origins clearly mean hatred of homosexuals.


    Fuck it. I’ll stick with sociopathic hatemongering bigot. Works for me.

    While I think you’re definitely on the right track with “sociopathic hatemongering bigot” I do also like “homostility.”

    With many of these folks I think a negative prefix would work better though. One completely random example: “ahomosexual.”

  21. paleotectonics said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:20

    Dear Kathy, King of the Kitchen,

    I must first contemplate your needlepoint. Having never seen that pattern, you must have done it freehand, and even spelled correctly. This is quite the accomplishment and you are within your rights to brag about it.

    I also note that your cake managed not to fall in the oven, especially given the daily beatings of your children and your hamster, and the stream of invection I imagine must cross your lips whenever Ellen Degeneres dares remind you that she is more than just a pretty face.
    But, Kathy darling, you keep forgetting your face mask and sufficient ventilation while applying Easy-off to your oven and your hamster, and I worry. Please take care, and remember the Teletubbies are an allegory.

  22. That Girl said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:27

    If she does have gay friends, far from absolving her of anything, that only makes her a bigger asshole.

  23. tigris said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:30

    Hence, I kindly, yet candidly, say: if you truly want to draw us closer to you, instead of pushing us farther and farther away — relinquish your cocky, condescending attitudes

    Sure, those who want a “friend” who is utterly repulsed by them, wants them to be fundamentally different than they are, and works like hell to make sure they lack basic rights should TOTALLY pay attention and accede to YOUR cocky, condescending attitudes. Sanctimonious twit.

  24. vacuumslayer said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:33

    So does every wingnut beef with the word “homophobe” actuallly boil down to “I ain’t afeart o’ no queer!”? ‘Cuz that level of stupid makes me sad.

  25. That Girl said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:34

    Holy shit, the mangos over there are so insane. I literally feel ill after reading them. I do think it’s hilarious that they accuse gay people of being obsessed with other people’s sex lives.

  26. sparks said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:35

    omg, the new Firefox sucks wingnut balls. Through a truck stop glory hole.

    Someone noticed! Not only does it act screwy, it’s also fucking slow on any site that has a lot of trackers/ad pages. (I’m talking to you, Pierce, get those damned Esquire idiots to stop larding your pages with ads, trackers, and facebook crap).

  27. vacuumslayer said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:35

    I’m a bigot; don’t call me a bigot. Calling me a bigot makes you the bigot.

    Every wingnut ever. In a nutshell.

    You’re welcome.

  28. vacuumslayer said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:36

    Someone noticed! Not only does it act screwy, it’s also fucking slow on any site that has a lot of trackers/ad pages. (I’m talking to you, Pierce, get those damned Esquire idiots to stop larding your pages with ads, trackers, and facebook crap).

    Yeah, it basically won’t load a shitload of my bookmarked sites. If it’s “in a mood.”

  29. tensor said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:42

    By frequently employing such terms, you merely sabotage your efforts to make certain that homosexuality is ultimately sanctioned by those of us who would strike it from existence if we could.

    Well, that explains it. Her gay friends are such morons, they both pursue an obviously unrealizable goal, then subvert their foolish goal by being mean to her. No wonder she has no respect for them!

    Then again, as already noted, the chance of such hopeless idiots living through the day without dying from forgetting to breathe is smaller than the probability that they really exist in the first place.

  30. Oregon Beer Snob said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:44

    Yeah, it basically won’t load a shitload of my bookmarked sites. If it’s “in a mood.”

    Ever since firefox moved into that condo with Chrome, Safari, and Explorer they’ve all been on the same cycle.

  31. vacuumslayer said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:47

    Ever since firefox moved into that condo with Chrome, Safari, and Explorer they’ve all been on the same cycle.

    As a humorless feminist I am not going to laugh at this joke, even though I totally was going to make it myself.

  32. Major Kong said,

    August 9, 2012 at 1:50

    we who oppose homosexuality are mean, hateful, unenlightened, narrow-minded clods

    Just because everyone says you’re a mean, hateful, unenlightened, narrow-minded clod doesn’t mean you’re not a mean, hateful, unenlightened, narrow-minded clod.

  33. LittlePig said,

    August 9, 2012 at 2:04

    Since “hydrophobic” is used in regards to chemicals that don’t play well with water, we must then by wingnut logic assume chemical compounds feel fear. Interesting.

    (Not really. “let’s make words whatever we want them to mean” shouldn’t hold any interest to anyone above the age of 12.)

  34. LittlePig said,

    August 9, 2012 at 2:06

    And you know damn well this hateful shut-in has no gay friends. She may know gay people that diss the hell out of her, but she’s too damn stupid to know it and thinks they’re “friends”. Christ on a cracker, getting paid money to put out horseshit like this.

  35. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 9, 2012 at 2:11

    Someone noticed! Not only does it act screwy, it’s also fucking slow on any site that has a lot of trackers/ad pages. (I’m talking to you, Pierce, get those damned Esquire idiots to stop larding your pages with ads, trackers, and facebook crap).

    Adblock Plus.
    NoScript.
    Flashblock.
    Better Privacy.
    Nuke Anything Enhanced.

  36. Major Kong said,

    August 9, 2012 at 2:14

    Off topic, but I’m completely and utterly terrified. I have a 4-day layover in Edmonton coming up and I won’t be able to carry a concealed handgun there.

    Horrors! I won’t be able to shoot the first two random Canadians who approach me on the sidewalk.

    Forced to wander the cruel dystopian streets of Alberta weaponless!

  37. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 9, 2012 at 2:16

    4-day layover in Edmonton

    SHIVER.

  38. Major Kong said,

    August 9, 2012 at 2:17

    It’s OK. I know where the pub is.

  39. tigris said,

    August 9, 2012 at 2:31

    relevant

    Also, re trackers, ghostery or do not track plus.

  40. Pupienus said,

    August 9, 2012 at 2:52

    Opera.

    Also, bite me, Karen.

  41. sparks said,

    August 9, 2012 at 2:56

    Use AB+, Ghostery, NoScript, and RequestPolicy. Sometimes I have to whitelist a site just to read it, or to read the comments. On occasion even that doesn’t help and I can’t read comments even if I disable everything (ex: Alicublog, Economist’s View). None of this happened (except not being able to read FB comments) until the new Firefox beta. A total piece of shit, it is, and every update makes it slower still.

  42. D Johnston said,

    August 9, 2012 at 3:12

    As long as we’re bitching about browsers, are any FF users having problems with Adobe Flash? Flash applets crash on me about every third page load.

  43. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 9, 2012 at 3:23

    Use AB+, Ghostery, NoScript, and RequestPolicy. Sometimes I have to whitelist a site just to read it, or to read the comments. On occasion even that doesn’t help and I can’t read comments even if I disable everything (ex: Alicublog, Economist’s View). None of this happened (except not being able to read FB comments) until the new Firefox beta.

    I’ve got Edroso with my combo.

  44. Spengler Dampniche said,

    August 9, 2012 at 3:24

    This isn’t even projection. It’s insanity.

  45. N__B said,

    August 9, 2012 at 3:25

    Does Paul Ryan make Rich Lowry starburst in his pants?

    How can you tell? A faint popping sound, like when you open a crusted-over ketchup bottle, accompanied by a single drop of dew?

  46. N__B said,

    August 9, 2012 at 3:26

    As long as we’re discussing browsers, I think we should be comparing the size of the patties mashed in the grass.

  47. Wampus said,

    August 9, 2012 at 4:02

    This takedown has gotten me to wondering. Has any columnist eviscerated here asked for mercy after?

  48. Bitter Scribe said,

    August 9, 2012 at 4:26

    Do you suppose she got paid twice for this? Do those sites even pay people? I have my doubts, because there are so many morons out there willing to pump out this bilge for free.

  49. kg said,

    August 9, 2012 at 4:29

    If she does get paid then there really is no god.

    btw, greetings from western suburbs, bs

  50. Bitter Scribe said,

    August 9, 2012 at 4:50

    btw, greetings from western suburbs, bs

    What gave me away?

  51. Bitter Scribe said,

    August 9, 2012 at 4:53

    My crappy Dell work laptop is running IE 7 but won’t download Flash for some reason so I can’t watch videos on it. So when my boss told me to watch a webinar today I had to stay home and watch it on my Mac. Sometimes technological retardation is good.

  52. kg said,

    August 9, 2012 at 4:56

    Past comments.

    I’m in Streamwood.

  53. Bitter Scribe said,

    August 9, 2012 at 5:11

    Elgin. Same school district but more gangbangers.

  54. Lancelot Link said,

    August 9, 2012 at 6:22

    Maybe her “friends” are self-loathing masochists like that Gape Hatriot guy.

  55. boconn13 said,

    August 9, 2012 at 7:03

    Having a ‘friend’ on Facebook is not the same as having a real friend.

  56. boconn13 said,

    August 9, 2012 at 7:05

    Reads the cake mix box, “Betty Crockoshit? No wonder it tastes funny!”

  57. Gordon, the Big Express Engine said,

    August 9, 2012 at 7:29

    Speaking of walrus sex (referenced early in the last thread – late to catch up – sorry), my buddy and I were at the Oakland zoo years ago and witnessed the walrus jerk itself off in front of group of school kids. It was simultaneously horrifying and fascinating; the beast barked aloud repeatedly and beat itself with its flipper (arm?) until this tremendous penis emerged and well you can guess the rest… We were shrooming at the time but that does not change what we saw, it only made it much funnier.

  58. John Revolta said,

    August 9, 2012 at 7:44

    koo koo ka chOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooo…………

  59. Mat said,

    August 9, 2012 at 8:22

    Fucking hell, it’s come to this: nearly half the people around us are batshit crazy, and somehow they’ve managed to rationalize their insanity to the point that they are not only comfortable with the huge contradictions, hypocrisy, and irrationality of their insanity, they’re fucking proud of it.

    The kooky fringe has grown into a rather large mob nowadays. It can only get ugly.

  60. richmx2 said,

    August 9, 2012 at 8:39

    I get the feeling Ms.Norling’s gay friends, are like the friends of some of our expats here in Mexico talk about their Mexican friends… meaning … their maid, their gardener, their hairdresser, i.e., people who put up with their bullshit and don’t ridicule them to their face.

  61. Smut Clyde said,

    August 9, 2012 at 12:01

    I must first contemplate your needlepoint.
    In Rockwell, of course. What other typeface would one use?

  62. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 13:07

    More pr0n from the XXX Olympiad

  63. Major Kong said,

    August 9, 2012 at 14:02

    More pr0n from the XXX Olympiad

    Maybe he was using it like a rudder to help steer the boat?

  64. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 14:52

    I just figured he was the cockswain.

  65. LittlePig said,

    August 9, 2012 at 14:55

    Maybe he was using it like a rudder to help steer the boat?

    “…yeah, and it’s deep, too”

  66. Pryme said,

    August 9, 2012 at 15:12

    This recent trend is interesting to me: if they really hate all liberals and think we’re wrong about just about everything, why would they care what we think of them? Why would they object to terminology and phrases that they used to embrace with pride? Why do they come across as being so…sensitive?

    It’d be like me saying, “No don’t call me pro-choice, that’s a misnomer.” Um, I believe that women should decide how to use their bodies. Do I think a woman should smoke while pregnant? No, but it’s her body. Do I think a woman should have a child that she knows she won’t be able to raise (whether the reason is financial, emotional or psychological)? Not really, but again, it’s her body.

    I’m not going to be ashamed of political labels that have been used for generations just because the mainstream has changed their opinion on how put off they should be of them. Of course, that may be the other reason behind this: more people are equating “homophobes” with “scared jerks” and that doesn’t bode well for a group desperate for votes.

  67. N__B said,

    August 9, 2012 at 15:15

    Maybe he was using it like a rudder to help steer the boat?

    Maybe he was flying sail from it to get extra speed.

  68. tigris said,

    August 9, 2012 at 15:21

    Maybe he was flying sail from it to get extra speed.

    That doesn’t jibe.

  69. Major Kong said,

    August 9, 2012 at 15:23

    That does explain why the French women’s swim team was lined up outside his dorm.

  70. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 15:24

    That doesn’t jibe.

    Something about “masthead” goes here. But it’s too early for me to work out exactly what.

  71. tigris said,

    August 9, 2012 at 15:37

    I’d probably take a different tack, but what exactly I haven’t a clew.

  72. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 15:42

    I’d probably take a different tack, but what exactly I haven’t a clew.

    This made luff out loud.

  73. zombie rotten mcdonald said,

    August 9, 2012 at 15:42

    MUST EVERY THREAD TURN INTO A PUN THREAD??!?!

    …seriously, it knocks me off my keel.

  74. N__B said,

    August 9, 2012 at 15:44

    That does explain why the French women’s swim team was lined up outside his dorm.

    They were there to haul his keel.

  75. Pryme said,

    August 9, 2012 at 15:49

    Something about “masthead” goes here. But it’s too early for me to work out exactly what.

    Considering the first few days amount to an Olympic orgy (a bunch or fit men and women stuffed in a small town? Duh.) that’s not surprising.

  76. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 15:53

    Poor Papa John, he’s going to have to raise the price of his pizza all because of mean ol’ Obama. Certainly can’t expect him to take money out of the 8 million in executive bonuses or the three million he makes a year to provide his employees with health care.

  77. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 15:57

    MUST EVERY THREAD TURN INTO A PUN THREAD??!?!

    I think this one has turned into a punt thread. I may be wrong, it’s been a long week and I’m a bit dinghy this morning, I don’t want to get into a row ‘boat it. (used my Canadian accent there) I’ll just ketch yawl later.

  78. kg said,

    August 9, 2012 at 16:13

    It doesn’t take a Rode Scholar to see where this thread is going…

  79. N__B said,

    August 9, 2012 at 16:13

    Some threads turn into PUN threads, some threads turn into POON threads, some threads turn into PEEN threads.

    That’s philosophy.

  80. tsam said,

    August 9, 2012 at 16:25

    As a humorless feminist I am not going to laugh at this joke, even though I totally was going to make it myself.

    I have 4–COUNT ‘EM 4–friends who are humorless feminists. I love them, but I just can’t condone their jokes.

  81. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 16:31

    That’s philosophy

  82. smedley said,

    August 9, 2012 at 16:35

    “Fortunately, they’ve got some specials going. A large chicken parmesan pizza is $9.99. Or, if I want to feed the brood, I can get two large pizzas for $21.99.”

    So, call up Papa John and say “I want one large chicken parmesan now, and another one in twenty minutes. No, I don’t want two; I want one now and one in twenty minutes. That way, I save $2.01. Take that $2.01 and provide health care for ten of your employees.

  83. kg said,

    August 9, 2012 at 16:42

    here comes smedley to muck things up with his liberal “math”

  84. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 17:03

    In conservative math there is no division.

  85. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 17:08

    Wikipedia locks out Stephen Colbert

  86. vacuumslayer said,

    August 9, 2012 at 17:13

    I already trolled Papa Johns on Bookface. It wasn’t even artful or clever trolling…yet I still felt better afterward.

  87. Helmut Monotreme said,

    August 9, 2012 at 17:24

    The one thing I like about all of these high profile CEOs going public with their objections to health care and gay marriage and basic human decency, is that it really highlights the personality traits of people who get rich. They don’t get rich because they are smarter or work harder, they get rich because they aren’t ashamed to look their workers in the eye and say “no, you don’t deserve health care.” and “no, you don’t deserve a living wage.” I don’t think I would have the guts to tell that to the people who made me rich.

  88. N__B said,

    August 9, 2012 at 17:37

    yet I still felt better afterward.

    Unlike, say, if you had eaten his product.

  89. N__B said,

    August 9, 2012 at 17:37

    Shorter Helmut: They get rich because they’re sociopaths.

  90. Pupienus said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:03

    There is dissent on the PENIS front.

  91. bbkf said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:04

    here’s what i learned about karen’s “friends”: they all live far, far away from her…hmmmmm…why would that be?

    also, she totally sells herself out with using ” ” around the term brother…what a twunt…can you imagine growing up with her? especially since she spent most of her waking hours self-admittedly in a state of hysterial laffter…

  92. bbkf said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:05

    also, weiners are funneh…i felt bad enough for little gabby giffords when she had the huge chalk mark right on her crotch, but boner boy wins now…

  93. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:12

    Eureka!

  94. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:14

    also, weiners are funneh

    Yes, the women laugh. But that’s not really the reaction I’m looking for.

  95. bbkf said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:18

    Yes, the women laugh. But that’s not really the reaction I’m looking for.

    they kinda remind me of puppies: either they’re lolling about or they’re straining to get your attention…

  96. N__B said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:19

    And they like kibble.

    Wait, I’ve said too much.

  97. bbkf said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:21

    And they like kibble.

    they also like to immerse themselves in strange, smelly things…

  98. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:21

    they kinda remind me of puppies: either they’re lolling about or they’re straining to get your attention…

    Or getting into something they’re not supposed to. Or so I hear.

  99. bbkf said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:24

    man…maintenance is fixing something in our bathroom…now i HAVE to go…grrr…

  100. Pupienus said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:30

    they also like to immerse themselves in strange, smelly things…

    Dogs are known to eat POOP. So there’s that.

  101. bbkf said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:34

    Dogs are known to eat POOP. So there’s that.

    i don’t even know where to go with that…!

  102. tigris said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:38

    Pet them enough and they get so excited they slobber all over you. I hear.

  103. N__B said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:40

    Bbkf – it’s a POOPY!

  104. bbkf said,

    August 9, 2012 at 18:56

    Bbkf – it’s a POOPY!

    i just haz a sad cuz i couldn’t come up with an innuendo for that one…or maybe i just did?

  105. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 9, 2012 at 19:04

    POOP is always an outuendo.

  106. bbkf said,

    August 9, 2012 at 19:25

    POOP is always an outuendo.

    constipationphobe!

  107. DAS said,

    August 9, 2012 at 19:37

    Since Substance McG linked to a Politico article, allow me to pick a particularly juicy, although some might say a bit off, mango and to fix it by applying two simple rules: (a) Politico is a GOP organ (he he, I said organ) and (b) it’s always projection! ALWAYS!

    The Democrats’ Republicans’ assault over Medicare .. well just about anything … will be ferocious — not to mention lowdown and dishonest. Hell, they’ve already all but accused Romney Obama of killing someone, and they haven’t even gotten around to Medicare deciding on their general election strategory. When the barrage starts, Romney Obama won’t be able to duck and cover or look at his shoes. He’ll have to win the argument — or at least hold his own.
    This is the broader point. Romney President Barack Obama has to carry the argument to President Barack Obama Former Massachusetts Governor, Vulture Capitalist and Possible Shape Shifting Alien, W. Mitt Romney . The state of the economy alone isn’t enough to convince people that Romney Obama has better ideas to create jobs. Neither is his résumé: no matter what Obama says and does somehow, he’s always viewed as a not quite competent yet dangerous socialist … and why now could that be? Romney Obama needs to make the case for his programs and not just speechify about stuff while, whenever he discusses anything in particular, he talks about the deals he wants to make rather than what he actually stands for making people assume the worst about his agenda, which assumptions will depend on where they stand politically relative to where they perceive Obama stands, in spite of any actual evidence

    There. Now I can get back to work and not worry, knowing the intertubez have been fixxored. Which is a good thing because my latest calculation just finished.

  108. DAS said,

    August 9, 2012 at 19:51

    I was reminded of this little blast from the past:

    “I have piles and piles of black friends. They come to my home, I marry them, they use my bathroom. I treat them just like everyone else.” — Keith Bardwell.

    Remember him? – Nym

    Recently a friend of ours was among a group of people accused of discriminatory actions at his work. The case was rather fishy considering he had just won a settlement due to his being a victim of on the job discrimination. He had asked my wife (a lawyer who happens to be African-American) for legal advice and if she’d accompany him to some preliminary hearing. I forget how my wife put her answer to him (she was a bit more diplomatic) but in relaying this to me she was more blunt: “If I felt that it would be to [X]‘s benefit to show up, I’d show up in a heart-beat … and bring some of my friends along too, but I somehow don’t think ‘look at my black friend(s), do you really think I’m racist?’ would be as good of a strategy as [X] seems to think it would be”.

  109. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 9, 2012 at 20:16

    An interview with Mitt.

  110. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 20:21

    Having gay friends or black friends really doesn’t disprove that you are a homophobe or a racist. Look at me, I have several friends who are Yankees fans and yet I still hold that species as a whole in utter contempt.

  111. Pryme said,

    August 9, 2012 at 20:25

    Urban Philosopher Chris Rock on guns. I gotta say, it’s humorous without being heartless and pretty much on point.

  112. Spearhafoc, who has been busy doing nothing in particular said,

    August 9, 2012 at 20:30

    Most of my friends don’t have red hair, but I still hold them all to be inferior genetic scum.

  113. tigris said,

    August 9, 2012 at 20:34

    An interview with Mitt.

    Wow, mitt blowjob squad in the comments.

  114. Lurking Canadian said,

    August 9, 2012 at 20:35

    it’s apparent that those of you who make liberal use of the terms “homophobia,” “homophobic,” and “homophobe” are trying to imply … that … we’re denying ourselves infinite pleasure and fulfillment — all because we choose to have sex solely with members of the opposite sex.

    Wait a minute. Does this mean that in order to be a lefty in good standing, I have to start…you know…shagging dudes? Can’t I just make an extra donation to Greenpeace, or something?

  115. Pryme said,

    August 9, 2012 at 20:40

    An interview with Mitt.

    Creepy that picture is.

    /Yoda

  116. ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said,

    August 9, 2012 at 20:44

    Today In Dishonest Fox Charts: Government Aid Edition

    http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/08/09/today-in-dishonest-fox-charts-government-aid-ed/189223

    Fox News is again highlighting a misleading chart to distort the debate over welfare reform and to amplify Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s inaccurate message that President Obama is “dismantling” of welfare reform. In fact, Obama simply gave states the flexibility they asked for in overseeing the welfare program.

    ————–

    Of course, FOX fought in court for their right to lie to their audience, so this is no surprise. (Nor is the fact that their willfully ignorant GOP base wants to be lied to.)
    ~

  117. DAS said,

    August 9, 2012 at 20:49

    Norling is simply recycling this — word for word and without any attribution — from a column she posted at Porno Pete LaBarbera’s site back in November 2011.

    Good thing Norling published this piece earlier with Porno Pete and not with (along the same naming lines) Fantasy Records.

  118. DAS said,

    August 9, 2012 at 20:51

    Heck, since we already had Pesach in July, let’s start with it again in August:

    A creepy Mitt Romney picture?

    Nu?

    How is this picture any different than any other Romney picture?

  119. Pryme said,

    August 9, 2012 at 21:02

    From the Rmoney interview:

    What was the best part of working at Bain? The thing that got you excited to get to the office each morning?
    I’m not sure people would think of me in this light, but frankly what I enjoyed most about Bain & Company, the consulting firm, was the analytical process of solving tough problems. If a client invites you in and is ready to pay a lot of money for your counsel, it is not because you know their business better than they do. Of course, they know their business better than I ever would. But they’re looking for someone to understand their business challenges in a new light. And that presents an analytical challenge which is steep and exciting. And I love the thinking and the analyzing as much as anything. I also enjoyed working with a team of people to arrive at ideas and solutions, and also to see ideas and solutions implemented. The experience at Bain Capital was similarly analytical, to decide which business ideas really had economic merit and which did not. And then to do your best to make sure that the team was in place to execute its vision.

    This is so generic it’s sickening. He likes getting paid millions to think about solutions his client might not have thought of, but he’s trying to make it sound so fucking profound. And he doesn’t even give an example of a company (you would think he’d have one or two favorite works memories, but as long as he’s being paid, who cares?) nor does he really give an example in any of his responses (before he tries to bolt early so he won’t have to answer a tax return question at the end).

    Also, someone who craves an “analytical challenge” would not allow his press secretary to essentially say people should move to Massachusetts if they want awesome health care (read: stay alive), let alone allow all the other colossal screw-ups he’s been involved with in the last 60 days.

  120. N__B said,

    August 9, 2012 at 21:09

    Craving analytical challenge.

  121. Pryme said,

    August 9, 2012 at 21:09

    Today In Dishonest Fox Charts: Government Aid Edition

    Chart Making 101 says you should at least try to start with that elusive number “0.” Sheesh.

  122. Big Bad Bald Bastard said,

    August 9, 2012 at 21:20

    Man, I stay away from the internet for one day of hanging out and drinking copious amounts of beer, and I return to find the entire wingnut brigade melting down over Andrea Saul’s comment about Romneycare?

    CHRISTMAS CAME EARLY!!!

  123. DAS said,

    August 9, 2012 at 21:21

    And I love the thinking and the analyzing as much as anything. I also enjoyed working with a team of people to arrive at ideas and solutions, and also to see ideas and solutions implemented.

    Sadly, No. If that is what really floated Mitt’s boat, he’d be a science faculty member at a leading research university, busying himself and his grad students and post-docs by solving all sorts of cool problems, all while making a nice, upper-middle class salary (i.e. amounts of money Mitt would consider to be chump change) … and he’d probably be a Democrat.

    The experience at Bain Capital was similarly analytical, to decide which business ideas really had economic merit and which did not.

    I wouldn’t say this so loudly, Mitt. According to your political allies, which business ideas have “economic merit” shouldn’t be decided based on some pointy-headed analysis but based on TEH INVISIBLE HAND OF TEH FREE MARKET!!!!

    By not invoking all that is holy in the name of Ayn Rand, you are committing political heresy here, Mittens. And your base ain’t gonna like it. Yeah, sure, the media people will give you mad props for being a “moderate”, but there are only so many media votes you can get while this sort of language won’t win anybody left of Joe Lieberman to your side. So, if I were you, I’d drop the egg-headed “analytic” talk before you loose the people who will actually show up and vote for you.

    And then to do your best to make sure that the team was in place to execute its vision.

    By firing people who will do useful work instead of executing your vision? Because you like firing people?

  124. Thread Bear said,

    August 9, 2012 at 21:25

    Does that vision get executed by firing squad or lethal injection?

  125. ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said,

    August 9, 2012 at 21:29

    Don’t you mean “The War on Christmas came early!”, B^4?
    ~

  126. Pryme said,

    August 9, 2012 at 21:52

    Dog Whistle, meet Dog Trombone.

  127. Pupienus Maximus said,

    August 9, 2012 at 22:02

    Joe Walsh went into the toilet when the James Gang folded.

  128. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 9, 2012 at 22:03

    It’s funny because POOP.

  129. Bitter Scribe said,

    August 9, 2012 at 22:18

    Yeah, Mitt, I bet the people who got tossed out on the street after you raided their companies found the “analytical challenge” of eating and paying their rent “steep and exciting” too.

  130. Pupienus Maximus said,

    August 9, 2012 at 22:19

    Also, I made pizza last night. A lot of pizza. The leftover pieces just made aqn excellent lunch. So in conclusion, suck my cock Papa John.

  131. kg said,

    August 9, 2012 at 22:28

    The first comment on that article takes the cake, Pryme :

    In his defense, “son” is what he calls people he doesn’t send money to.

    I can’t wait to kick that rusty trombone to the curb come november.

  132. Smut Clyde said,

    August 9, 2012 at 22:30

    man…maintenance is fixing something in our bathroom

    Am I wrong to imagine that being sung by Ethel Waters?

  133. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 9, 2012 at 22:33

    Wayne Allyn’s Root:

    Here’s my gut belief: Obama got a leg up by being admitted to both Occidental and Columbia as a foreign exchange student. He was raised as a young boy in Indonesia. But did his mother ever change him back to a U.S. citizen? When he returned to live with his grandparents in Hawaii or as he neared college-age preparing to apply to schools, did he ever change his citizenship back? I’m betting not.

    If you could unseal Obama’s Columbia University records I believe you’d find that:

    A) He rarely ever attended class.

    B) His grades were not those typical of what we understand it takes to get into Harvard Law School.

    C) He attended Columbia as a foreign exchange student.

    D) He paid little for either undergraduate college or Harvard Law School because of foreign aid and scholarships given to a poor foreign students like this kid Barry Soetoro from Indonesia.

    If you think I’m “fishing” then prove me wrong. Open up your records Mr. President. What are you afraid of?

    If it’s okay for U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to go on a fishing expedition about Romney’s taxes (even though he knows absolutely nothing about them nor will release his own), then I think I can do the same thing. But as Obama’s Columbia Class of ’83 classmate, at least I have more standing to make educated guesses.

    The subtle difference there is that Harry Reid’s ploy is a political game which he can win or lose and Mitt still looks bad. Going birther kinda makes you look bananas.

  134. Pryme said,

    August 9, 2012 at 22:34

    I think they meant to say, “The Rich Are Continuing To Hoard Cash.”

  135. Pryme said,

    August 9, 2012 at 22:44

    If it’s okay for U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to go on a fishing expedition about Romney’s taxes (even though he knows absolutely nothing about them nor will release his own), then I think I can do the same thing. But as Obama’s Columbia Class of ’83 classmate, at least I have more standing to make educated guesses.

    I missed the part in the Constitution where a candidate’s education level is a criteria. And the part where releasing academic records became a precedent for running for office.

    Also, does Wayne how know colleges determine whether or not you attended classes? They call it, “the final exam.” I can’t speak on Columbia specifically, but I don’t know many colleges where they take attendance like it’s high school.

  136. bbkf said,

    August 9, 2012 at 22:52

    many, many mangoes:

    Homosexuals are forcing Government intrusion into marriage, rightfully angering We The People. If the homosexuals can’t see this, they’re either idiots, like to call attention to themselves, or actually enjoy the the conflict they’re causing.

    um, government has already intruded into marriage, dipshit…

    Know what you mean, went to Key West a few yrs ago. As a straight guy ’bout 6′ looking like Val Kilmer. I had too many gays make a pass, to the point I got fed up and left early to visit else where in Florida. I wish I could’ve bought a T-shirt saying:

    ‘I’m not gay, OK!!!!’

    It certainly was repulsive and frankly sad….

    god, i want to see a picture of this dude ‘looking like val kilmer’…

    nature is very efficient. If it was “genetic”, they would not have procreated (because they are unable to) and that “gene” would have not been passed to the offspring. And that would have happened during cave man times

    cannot argue with that logic! i wonder if this commenter knows the other commenter who ‘talked to a geneticist’ who told him there is no gay gene?

    The author was not bashing the homosexual lifestyle, she just said she didn’t approve of it….nothing more, so get off your high-horse fella!

    yeah, fella!

    Jimmie Joe, for your edification, and for the awareness of the other posters, Zombie at PJMedia has documented much of the San Francisco street activity. The pictures at the link attached are from the Folsom Street Fair. Zombie gives objective background details and many pictures.

    *Warning – Graphic Images*
    http://www.zombietime(dot)com/folsom_sf_2007_part_1/index.php

    so if gay sex is so gross, why do they continually send each other pics of it? what am i missing here?

    My dad stopped going to church about five years ago and my mom pointed out that he’s loosing the ability to separate right vs. wrong , that the lines are blurring for him. Of course, humanists will always, always, always say they can tell right from wrong and that the origin of such an ability is “themselves.” my mom also pointed out that he has grown self-centered and his ego is at times very irritating and stressful on her.

    just for it’s randomness, i think this one is my favorite…

    and finally:

    I think the ultimate goal is the legalization of same-sex marriage in churches, sinagoge (misspelled) and Catholics churches. Somewhere in the great literature on line I remember seeing that gays are not trying to enhance the definition of marriage but to desicrate it, to destroy it for all.

    this totally smart, well-informed individual is trying to warn us of the coming gaypocalypse…run, run for your lives! repent now!

  137. bbkf said,

    August 9, 2012 at 22:53

    and please, don’t mind the tagfail…

  138. DAS said,

    August 9, 2012 at 22:55

    Am I wrong to imagine that being sung by Ethel Waters? – Smut Clyde

    Just try not to imagine that being sung by Ethel Merman.

  139. tigris said,

    August 9, 2012 at 22:59

    I missed the part in the Constitution where a candidate’s education level is a criteria. And the part where releasing academic records became a precedent for running for office.

    Well yeah, and the part where it mattered what someone did years ago at school vs the sort of financial reporting necessary and required for legal oversight.

    Also the bit where you “change your citizenship back” like it’s an out of office message.

  140. DAS said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:05

    I think the ultimate goal is the legalization of same-sex marriage in churches, sinagoge (misspelled) and Catholics churches.

    Sorry to leak the gay agenda (the gays should have known better than to tell straight guys like me their real agenda), but this may very well be true. I know that there has been a pretty much successful push in my religious denomination to “legalize” gay marriage (btw, what does “legalize” mean in the context of many Protestant churches which at some level are antinomian?). And this is, in my opinion, not a bad thing.

    However, it is a matter of religious freedom, which the right is often wont to ignore in their rush to force their religious observances on the rest of us, to let synagogues, churches, mosques, etc., make up their own minds on gay marriage. Of course, that doesn’t mean we can’t hope that they come around to supporting it.

    But religious freedom also means those who oppose gay marriage have no more right to make it a matter of secular law to not extend marriage rights to homosexuals (and how is allowing a man to marry a woman but not another man not completely unjustifiable gender discrimination?) than Jews like me have a right to make it a matter of secular law to forbid the consumption of blood sausages.

    Just because the law allows gay marriage or blood sausage consumption doesn’t mean that your church has to perform gay marriages or my synagogue has to serve blood sausages at shabbos kiddush. But it does mean that your church (outside of, I’ll grant you, hiring decisions involving, for example, clergy) cannot discriminate or encourage the discrimination against gays any more than my synagogue can or should post a big sign saying “blood sausage eaters shouldn’t bother to come anywhere near here — not even to the senior center our shul runs for people of all faiths”.

    Somewhere in the great literature on line I remember seeing that gays are not trying to enhance the definition of marriage but to desicrate it, to destroy it for all.

    Oh … that’s an august source of “great literature” … “on line”. I wonder what porn site he was reading when he found out that the evil gay agenda was to destroy marriage.

  141. tigris said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:15

    As a straight guy ’bout 6? looking like Val Kilmer. I had too many gays make a pass, to the point I got fed up and left early to visit else where in Florida.

    As a person so hot it makes all living creatures quake* I completely understand and can offer this tidbit of helpful advice: get the fuck over yourself. If somebody approaches you, accept it is as a compliment, decline graciously, and move on. JESUS it is not that hard. Also, QUIT HANGING OUT IN GAY BARS.

    they would not have procreated (because they are unable to)

    What, can they not find the proper opening or is their sperm too mincing to get the job done?

    My dad stopped going to church about five years ago and my mom pointed out that he’s loosing the ability to separate right vs. wrong , that the lines are blurring for him.

    Or maybe he sees clearly that your irritable, critical mother has drawn the lines in the wrong place? I know, UNPOSSIBLE!

    *because it can’t be caused by the bad temper and unblinking stare, RIGHT?

  142. Pupienus said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:21

    Yeah, some churches and many synagogues already recognize marriage equality. Those reichwingers – such religious intolerance!

  143. Random Homophobe said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:27

    I love ice cream. You know what would make ice cream even better? Keep the damn homos from having any!

  144. tsam said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:28

    *because it can’t be caused by the bad temper and unblinking stare, RIGHT?

    I thank she loosed her abilty to spell.

  145. tsam said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:28

    How does one separate right VS wrong anyway?

  146. Bitter Scribe said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:29

    nature is very efficient. If it was “genetic”, they would not have procreated (because they are unable to) and that “gene” would have not been passed to the offspring.

    That sounds dangerously close to a belief in natural selection.

  147. Smut Clyde said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:29

    my mom pointed out that he’s loosing the ability to separate right vs. wrong

    Unleash the dogs! Release the Kraken! Loose the ability to separate right vs. wrong!!

  148. tigris said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:29

    Crowbar.

  149. Smut Clyde said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:30

    You know what would make ice cream even better?
    FLUORIDE.

  150. tsam said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:32

    OH you gays and your special rights…

    Betcha didn’t know that equal means special, did you?

    You know what makes me really mad? I know, but I’m going to answer my own question anyway. Let’s not forget who this is all about.

    The idea that the right to marry someone is something that is to be granted. Freedom is not for the breeders to give or take. I’m not sure how this became an argument in the first fucking place, but how is it that the group that’s always yammering incoherently about freedom has absolutely no concept of its meaning?

  151. N__B said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:33

    Poopy!

  152. Pupienus said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:36

    Poopy!

    Yes? You bellowed?

  153. tsam said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:51

    You know what would make ice cream even better?

    HITLER

  154. N__B said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:51

    Hitler poopy.

  155. tsam said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:52

    I bet Hitler’s poops were tiny and insignificant.

  156. Spearhafoc, who has been busy doing nothing in particular said,

    August 9, 2012 at 23:57

    Even ignoring the concept of recessive genes or suchlike, gays reproduce all the time and have throughout history. Haven’t these people heard of the closet?

    Oscar Wilde himself had a wife and two kids.

  157. kg said,

    August 10, 2012 at 0:04

    Yes even when they get on board the natural selection train they epically fail .

    ChooChoo!

  158. Gary Ruppert said,

    August 10, 2012 at 0:08

    The fact is the gayajenda is an insideous plan to turn the Red, White and Blue into a reinbow colored melting pot of seculer debaucherie.

  159. tsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 0:12

    Boring troll is boring.

  160. tigris said,

    August 10, 2012 at 1:24

    reinbow colored melting pot of seculer debaucherie.

    HOT.

  161. Smut Clyde said,

    August 10, 2012 at 1:24

    The Walrus and the Carpenter Were walking hand in hand.
    “If only,” said the Carpenter, “the Law would understand.”

  162. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 10, 2012 at 1:49

    reinbow

    I call Spearhafoc.

  163. Whale Chowder said,

    August 10, 2012 at 1:57

    I bet Hitler’s poops were tiny and insignificant.

    But he still arrayed them outside Berlin to fend off the Allies and was VERY UPSET when they failed.

  164. Big Bad Bald Bastard said,

    August 10, 2012 at 2:02

    How does one separate right VS wrong anyway?

    Is wrong VS from an evil parallel universe where Dudeskull has a beard?

  165. Big Bad Bald Bastard said,

    August 10, 2012 at 2:07

    As a straight guy ’bout 6? looking like Val Kilmer.

    He meant to write, Val Kilmister, Lemmy’s uglier brother.

  166. N__B said,

    August 10, 2012 at 2:11

    I call Spearhafoc.

    Are we choosing up sides for kickball or are you declaring the blog comment that dare not speak its name?

  167. Smut Clyde said,

    August 10, 2012 at 2:35

    seculer
    I’ll take “French reflexive verbs” for $200, Alex.

  168. Lurking Canadian said,

    August 10, 2012 at 2:41

    and please, don’t mind the tagfail…

    tagfail? And here I was, all, “I had no idea bbkf looked hot like Val Kilmer!”

  169. Pupienus said,

    August 10, 2012 at 3:35

    I would not be the least surprised to find that he looks like Val Kilmer.

  170. Stogoe said,

    August 10, 2012 at 3:43

    Re: religious freedom, the thing that really bugs me about the birth control whine is that the argument ignores the employees’ religious freedom to use (or not) their compensation from their fucking job to purchase whatever health care they deem moral. No, it’s all about what the boss is allowed to force you to do, or stop you from doing.

  171. tigris said,

    August 10, 2012 at 3:47

    I would not be the least surprised to find that he looks like Val Kilmer.

    Oh yeah, you know the gays canNOT keep their hands offa that.

  172. Thread Bear said,

    August 10, 2012 at 4:37

    As a 5′ 11″ guy who looks nothing like Val Kilmer, I have been to Key West on numerous occasions. I have been approached by guys a few times. I have no problem letting them know politely that I am not interested. I will admit that it was a little unsettling the first time, I was a junior in high school at the time, but I learned from that experience that it is really no different than being approached by someone of the opposite sex that you are not attracted to. There’s no reason to panic, freak out or be rude, just saying no thanks has always worked so far. As I told a friend of mine once who got a little freaked out about a similar situation, you may not want to go to the party but it’s always nice to get an invitation.

  173. N__B said,

    August 10, 2012 at 4:43

    As a 7′-4″ anthropomorphic polar bear, I never get any decent passes. Hence the occasional mauling.

  174. Funkula said,

    August 10, 2012 at 8:30

    Have you tried attending fur cons? You could pull like crazy there.

  175. Major Kong said,

    August 10, 2012 at 9:57

    It’s dark out and I’m tired – must be time to go to work.

  176. "Oh, Stewardess, I Speak 'Nut" said,

    August 10, 2012 at 14:48

    “[T]hey’re looking for someone to understand their business challenges in a new light . . . I love the thinking and the analyzing . . . I also enjoyed working with a team of people to arrive at ideas and solutions, and also to see ideas and solutions implemented.”

    [A lengthy pause, followed eventually by peals of laughter]

    “And then we’d do what we always did: load ‘em up with as much debt as possible, to pay for our tens of millions of dollars in fees; outsource all of their production to China or Vietnam; and shut down their domestic operations and tell their employees to take a hike. I especially liked that last part”

  177. kg said,

    August 10, 2012 at 15:51

    Hey, Mark Bittman doesn’t just write about food!
    http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/09/bittman-guns-butter-and-then-some/?hp

  178. g said,

    August 10, 2012 at 16:09

    OK OK, I concede her point. She doesn’t fear Teh Gay, she just hates them.

  179. Pryme said,

    August 10, 2012 at 17:14

    Never thought I’d see the day where someone would use the Bible to justify rape, but here we are.

  180. N__B said,

    August 10, 2012 at 17:44

    Pryme –

    He’s paraphrasing the gospel of Conan. He want to kill his enemies, drive them before him, and hear the lamentations of their women.

  181. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 18:00

    Haven’t these people heard of the closet?

    omg…one of the commenters IS in the closet and was quite proud of the life he led being in the closet…says it’s much more enjoyable as a gay man to hide it…WEIRDO!

  182. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 18:03

    tagfail? And here I was, all, “I had no idea bbkf looked hot like Val Kilmer!”

    well a girl has to play the hand she’s dealt…

    I would not be the least surprised to find that he looks like Val Kilmer.

    fat val kilmer is THE VERY FIRST thought i had when reading that comment…

  183. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 18:10

    OK OK, I concede her point. She doesn’t fear Teh Gay, she just hates them.

    okay, to be perfectly clear, she is REPULSED by them…let’s play the dictionary game, shall we?

    re·pulse (r-pls)
    tr.v. re·pulsed, re·puls·ing, re·puls·es
    1. To drive back; repel.
    2. To rebuff or reject with rudeness, coldness, or denial.
    3. Usage Problem To cause repugnance or distaste in.
    n.
    1. The act of repulsing or the state of being repulsed.
    2. Rejection; refusal.

    re·pulser n.
    Usage Note: A number of critics have maintained that repulse should only be used to mean “to drive away, spurn,” as in He rudely repulsed their overtures, and not to mean “to cause repulsion in,” as in Their hypocrisy repulsed me. In recent years, however, there has been an increasing tendency to use repulse in the latter sense. Reputable literary precedent exists for this usage, and given that the stigmatized use of repulse is parallel to the unexceptionable uses of repulsion and repulsive, the frequency of its appearance is not surprising. Still, writers who want to avoid repulse may choose repel, a synonym that is perfectly acceptable

    since most of karen’s *friends* (including her “double” cousin..whatever the fuck that means) choose to be far away from her, i guess she’s right…she’s not fearful of them, she’s just “doubly” repulsed by them…

  184. N__B said,

    August 10, 2012 at 18:11

    fat val kilmer is THE VERY FIRST thought i had

    You were an odd baby.

  185. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 18:16

    Certain cultures practice “corrective rape” to “correct” the sexual orientation of Lesbian women.

    whoa…wtf?!?! twenty bucks says this isn’t a gay-away therapy marcus bachmann would try…

    He’s paraphrasing the gospel of Conan. He want to kill his enemies, drive them before him, and hear the lamentations of their women.

    what a jerk! and here i thought he just wanted leno’s time slot!

    You were an odd baby

    and now i’m an odd woman…that’s just how us pixelated ones roll…

  186. Pryme said,

    August 10, 2012 at 18:22

    Finally…someone with some real business sense speaks on the “Pizzas & Pennies” issue.

  187. Pupienus said,

    August 10, 2012 at 18:28

    WTF is with everybody reporting that “officials have yet to find a motive” for the skinhead terrorist. He was a fucking skinhead! Does no one understand that they fucking hate hate hate people? Do they not get that they are violent lunatics? Oh … He is white so they need some extra motivation, something other than HE WAS A FUCKING SKINHEAD! Stop pretending that BEING A FUCKING SKINHEAD isnt motivation enough goddamn it.

  188. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 10, 2012 at 18:47

    Stop pretending that BEING A FUCKING SKINHEAD isnt motivation enough goddamn it.

    Still, killing people takes time away from sniffing glue.

  189. jim the heretical Anti-Cliff Lemming said,

    August 10, 2012 at 18:57

    Breathtaking how Norley’s four ghey pals are packing such stupendous skookum levels of mojo as to neutralize her homophobia on contact.

    1 CLONE ALL 4 OF THEM
    2. SELL RESULTING EMBRYOCICLES ON E-BAY
    3. NO “?????” ……………. JUST DELICIOUS PROFIT

    Never thought I’d see the day where someone would use the Bible to justify rape, but here we are.

    The Folkway Rodeo: he is being its clown.

    Yer Abrahamic religions all tend to get quite rapey & enslavey & executey at the drop of a fez, given enough slack.

  190. tsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 19:00

    Still, killing people takes time away from sniffing glue.

    Which is lucky, because my whistling coworker has a huge target on his back.

  191. tsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 19:19

    Breathtaking how Norley’s four ghey pals are packing such stupendous skookum levels of mojo as to neutralize her homophobia on contact.

    It is breathtaking. I have noticed the same phenomenon with dudebros in Tapout gear and redline levels of douchery. For some reason, hot girls seem to dig that shit.

  192. smedley said,

    August 10, 2012 at 19:23

    “…since most of karen’s *friends* (including her “double” cousin..whatever the fuck that means) ”

    Is it irresponsible not to speculate that a “double” cousin is one who is related to both Karen and her spouse? Through inbreeding, maybe?

  193. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 19:37

    Is it irresponsible not to speculate that a “double” cousin is one who is related to both Karen and her spouse? Through inbreeding, maybe?

    not only is that a responsible speculation, it is the only logical answer!

  194. smedley said,

    August 10, 2012 at 19:45

    Unless she meant to say “double-wide” cousin; but that would prolly be “all of ‘em, Katie!”

  195. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 19:48

    Unless she meant to say “double-wide” cousin; but that would prolly be “all of ‘em, Katie!”

    maybe he’s just full of cousiny goodness…like doublemint gum?

  196. Pryme said,

    August 10, 2012 at 20:10

    maybe he’s just full of cousiny goodness…like doublemint gum?

    You’ve given us all something to chew on.

  197. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 10, 2012 at 20:28

    Does this even count as spin?

    Katrina Trinko posted yesterday about Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul’s comments about how a woman in a controversial pro-Obama ad would have had health-care coverage if she had lived in Massachusetts under Governor Romney’s health-care plan. The conservative punditocracy lit up with outrage: Ann Coulter said Andrea Saul should be fired. Erick Erickson said her response raised doubts on the right about Romney himself; and even Rush Limbaugh said her statement could help the Obama team.

    [...]

    The undercurrent of the criticism of Saul is that Romney should be deeply ashamed of the policy he himself implemented just a handful of years ago. But I think it’s highly unlikely that Romney actually feels the level of shame some extremely demanding people are requiring of him. He attacks the Obamacare policy because he believes it is different in significant ways from his own Massachusetts health-care plan. As someone who is not a policy wonk — something I have in common with, oh, at least 97 percent of Americans — I believe him on this.

  198. Whale Chowder said,

    August 10, 2012 at 20:29

    her “double” cousin..whatever the fuck that means

    …as in Double-stuffed Oreo, full of creamy goodness* on the inside.

    .

    .

    .

    *note, I did NOT say Santorum.

  199. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 20:41

    The undercurrent of the criticism of Saul is that Romney should be deeply ashamed of the policy he himself implemented just a handful of years ago.

    huh…i thought it was at the callousness which saul and mittens feel about not rich people…

  200. Pryme said,

    August 10, 2012 at 20:43

    As someone who is not a policy wonk — something I have in common with, oh, at least 97 percent of Americans — I believe him on this.

    The fact that you are not a policy wonk, yet are trying to opine on politics, is precisely the reason average Americans should not care what you believe on this issue.

    P.S.: saying shit like, “Oh at least 97 percent” like you even looked at a study doesn’t help either.

  201. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 10, 2012 at 20:45

    Mitt doesn’t have shame and I believe him because I don’t understand stuff.

  202. Pupienus Maximus said,

    August 10, 2012 at 20:50

    I HAVE A RIGHT TO MY OPINION!

    It matters not one whit that my opinion is ill-informed, based in ignorance and disinformation, derived entirely from emotion as opposed to thought, and besides it WAS GIVEN TO ME BY RUSH LIMBAUGH!

  203. tigris said,

    August 10, 2012 at 20:51

    He attacks the Obamacare policy because he believes it is different in significant ways from his own Massachusetts health-care plan.

    The exact nature of these significant differences he is not required by law to share with the electorate.

  204. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 10, 2012 at 20:58

    The silliness is ramping up today. Just a Friday thing or does it correspond with that Fox poll that has Obama up?

  205. Pupienus Maximus said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:06

    I LOLded.

    “I think he stole my birth control too!”.

  206. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:09

    “I think he stole my birth control too!”.

    That’s a funny ad, and it’s a reason to vote.

    WSJ:

    President Obama spent his formative years in academia, so he’s no doubt familiar with postmodernism, the literary theory that rejects objective reality and insists instead that everything is a matter of interpretation and relative “truth.” At any rate he’s running the first postmodern Presidential campaign, now organized almost exclusively around allegations about his opponent that bear no relation to the observable universe.

    I suppose this is, especially after the last couple of stupid weeks from Romneyco., the Rovian thing to do…

  207. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:22

    “I think he stole my birth control too!”.

    pure gold…

  208. The Principal Contributt said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:23

    I *believe* that I have everything in common with 3600% of Americans, thus my opinion is highly important and inevitably the truth.

  209. Gen Jack D. Ripper mozart said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:27

    You know what would make ice cream even better?
    FLUORIDE.

    Ice cream, childrens’ ice cream! Mandrake.

  210. tsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:29

    It matters not one whit that my opinion is ill-informed, based in ignorance and disinformation, derived entirely from emotion as opposed to thought, and besides it WAS GIVEN TO ME BY RUSH LIMBAUGH!

    Can’t argue with that!

    EW–Rush gave it to you? NASTY.

  211. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:32

    in which a man on camera accuses Mitt Romney of killing his wife.

    weren’t panties in a wad earlier this week over harry reid’s accusation that he couldn’t back up? and here’s this imagined accusation, because…um, the dude doesn’t straight out SAY that mitt killed his wife…it’s implied that mitt’s m.o. may be problematic to one’s health…

    A postmodern postscript: The Obama campaign was at first more than happy to slipstream behind the Priorities USA smear, refusing to disavow the cancer ad and deflecting questions by claiming not to “know the specifics” (Robert Gibbs) or “know the facts” (deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter). But even their professions of ignorance turn out to be false.

    In May, Mr. Soptic appeared in an official Obama for America ad—”I’m Barack Obama, and I approve this message,” it concluded. Mr. Soptic told reporters his life story on a conference call, hosted by the Obama campaign and . . . Ms. Cutter.

    i only saw gibbs, cutter and carney say they hadn’t seen the ad…splitting semantics? maybe…but the ‘i haven’t seen it’ is a common enough strategery…

    damn, the dissonance is deafening sometimes…also, too the projection…

  212. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:34

    As someone who is not a policy wonk

    No shit, bro.

    — something I have in common with, oh, at least 97 percent of Americans —

    Don’t touch that stat, it JUST CAME OUT OF YOUR BUTTHOLE!

    I believe him on this.

    QED, eh? Word.

  213. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:36

    flotsam and jetsam is tsam, btw. I noticed this curious coincidence after seeing the term in print. Perhaps this was the real subconscious origin of the nym. Or maybe I really really need a drink.

  214. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:38

    Mitt Romney–YOU GET YOUR HAND IN MY POCKET.

    This one over here. Little deeper, little dee…AH, THERE WE GO.

  215. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:39

    Maybe some Flotsam and Jetsam is needed. Or just more Hitler.

  216. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:44

    I loved those guys! That’s where Jason Newsted came from…

  217. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:45

    Though I forgot what an absolutely horrendous guitar solo that was in that intro.

  218. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:52

    While we’re strolling down Metal Memory Lane…

    BADFUCKINGASS

  219. Pupienus Maximus said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:55

    I just figure your first name was ‘flo’.

  220. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:57

    I just figure your first name was ‘flo’.

    It should be–I love Flo from those insurance commercials.

  221. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 10, 2012 at 21:59

    Still not through B but there’s only so much Beatles and Byrds I can take in a row, so…
    Pistol Pistol ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| D12
    Daytripper |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Cheap Trick
    Bad Journey ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Christine McVie
    Omaha ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Damien Jurado
    Don't Let the Sun Go Down on Your Grievience |||||||||||||||||||| Daniel Johnston
    Op.72 no.7 in C major - Allegro vivace | George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra
    Into the Groovy ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Ciccone Youth
    You're Killing Me Sometimes |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Coldplay
    Easy Come, Easy Go |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Christine McVie
    Overture / And All That Jazz ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Catherine Zeta-Jones
    Wanderin' ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Chris Isaak
    Tombstone Shadow ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Creedence Clearwater Revival
    Night Songs |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Cinderella
    Pressure Drop ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| The Clash
    Hey Bulldog |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| The Beatles
    Being For The Benefit Of Mr Kite |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| The Beatles
    Strawberry Fields Forever ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| The Beatles
    The Big Brass Band From Brazil ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Danny Kaye
    One In Their Pride ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Celtic Frost
    When I Get Home |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| The Beatles

  222. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:33

    It should be–I love Flo from those insurance commercials.

    one of my bar customers always calls me ‘flo’ because of those damn commercials!

  223. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:33

    and as been pointed out earlier, i’m a bit odd…

  224. Pupienus Maximus said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:35

    Brilliant!. Alas, it seems to not be satire.

  225. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:42

    My ultimate goal would be to develop a white caucus for white people. We don’t have a collective voice.

    You can’t rely on RINO Mitt.

  226. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:45

    Brilliant!. Alas, it seems to not be satire.

    not a surprise that this came out of texas…it occurs to me that ‘big sandy hawkins’ sounds like the name of a rich texas oilman…

  227. Spearhafoc, who has been busy doing nothing in particular said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:48

    Sandy Hawkins was the name of the sidekick to the Golden Age version of Sandman.

  228. Pryme said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:49

    Would it kill y’all to play some Wu-Tang every now and then?

  229. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:51

    Sandy Hawkins was the name of the sidekick to the Golden Age version of Sandman.

    any relation to sandy cheeks?

  230. Major Kong said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:51

    Isn’t “Bad Journey” redundant?

  231. Spearhafoc, who has been busy doing nothing in particular said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:54

    any relation to sandy cheeks?

    Yes, because people with the same first name are related.

    Especially if one of those people is a squirrel and the other is a human who got turned into a sand creature.

  232. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:55

    Isn’t “Bad Journey” redundant?

    Also bad, as it turns out.

  233. Spearhafoc, who has been busy doing nothing in particular said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:57

    Also, if your name is Sandy Hawkins, why the hell would your superhero name be “Sandy the Golden Boy”?

    Why even bother wearing a mask at that point?

  234. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:59

    Would it kill y’all to play some Wu-Tang every now and then?

    I expect to get to W in a year or so.

  235. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:59

    Especially if one of those people is a squirrel and the other is a human who got turned into a sand creature.

    that makes sense…especially if there is a “double” cousin in there somewhere…

  236. Major Kong said,

    August 10, 2012 at 22:59

    Why even bother wearing a mask at that point?

    Maybe they’re just into that sort of thing.

  237. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:02

    Maybe they’re just into that sort of thing.

    it IS a sick world, and you ARE a happy man, aren’t you?

  238. Spearhafoc, who has been busy doing nothing in particular said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:06

    A lot of Golden Age sidekicks wore masks despite using their regular name.

    Captain America’s Bucky, The Black Terror’s Tim…actually, come to think of it, the 1930s radio hero Green Hornet had Kato, so this goes back even further than the Golden Age. Hmmmm.

  239. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:07

    it IS a sick world, and you ARE a happy man, aren’t you?

    MAYBE I am a happy MAN. What’s IT to you?

  240. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:07

    so this goes back even further than the Golden Age

    To the Knights Templar, yes?

  241. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:08

    I also just realized this shit right here:

    Jetsam

    Je = I
    tsam = tsam

    There, jetsam = I tsam. GRRRROWL!

  242. Major Kong said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:09

    it IS a sick world, and you ARE a happy man, aren’t you?

    Affirmative on both.

  243. Spearhafoc, who has been busy doing nothing in particular said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:12

    To the Knights Templar, yes?

    I was thinking Atlantis or the lost continent of Mu.

  244. Thread Bear said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:13

    When I was little I had a hermit crab named Sandy Claws. He was probably related too. He was a double cousin but one of those was once removed.

  245. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:13

    I also just realized this shit right here:

    Jetsam

    Je = I
    tsam = tsam

    There, jetsam = I tsam. GRRRROWL!

    a realization such as this must be celebrated!

  246. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:15

    I was thinking Atlantis or the lost continent of Mu.

    hmmmmm…atlantis basically turned into flotsam and jetsam…and flotsam and jetsom is usually adrift at sea…i.e. ‘lost’ if you will…ZOMG!!!

    this thread is tintin!!!

  247. Thread Bear said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:18

    If you package him properly, Major Kong will jetSam to anywhere you’d like.

  248. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:23

    a realization such as this must be celebrated!

    YES! I intend to fuck up a bottle of rum tonight and do something really inappropriate and/or dangerous.

  249. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:27

    YOU HAVE GOT TO BE FUCKING KIDDING ME

    Who ARE these people that would give a 16 year old Olympic champion shit about her fucking hair? I don’t want to live on this planet anymore.

  250. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:33

    Who ARE these people that would give a 16 year old Olympic champion shit about her fucking hair?

    the same fuckers who call jessica ennis fat…

  251. vacuumslayer said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:37

    Wow. Kate Upton is called piggy and women with sixpacks are called “fat.” It’s truly a weird world women live in. Have men ever been so scrutinized?

  252. vacuumslayer said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:41

    I expect to get to W in a year or so.

    How big *IS* your library?

  253. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:41

    the same fuckers who call jessica ennis fat…

    Um, yeah. Ok. When did perfectly toned athletes become fat? What the fuck is wrong with people? Seems like no matter what you do, some fucking asshole is giving you shit over one thing or another. Haters. I HATE THEM SO MUCH.

  254. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:42

    Wow. Kate Upton is called piggy and women with sixpacks are called “fat.” It’s truly a weird world women live in. Have men ever been so scrutinized?

    Kate Upton is fucking STUNNING.

  255. Major Kong said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:44

    Have men ever been so scrutinized?

    I’d say we get cut a lot more slack on appearance than women do.

  256. N__B said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:48

    A lot of men with six packs* are fat.

    *in their coolers.

  257. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:48

    Have men ever been so scrutinized?

    No. Not even close.

    How often do you see beautiful women with butt-ugly, shitty scumbags like Mick Jagger and Stephen Tyler? Jesse James? Christina Hendricks’ husband (I forget his name)? Marc Anthony…

    The list goes on and on and on.

  258. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:48

    omg…joe soucheray is calling an early scramble due to his deep disgust and depression over the ‘romney killed my wife’ ad…and he’s acting like romney is as white as the fuckingpurewhite snow…

  259. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:49

    *in their coolers.

    I think the fat ones had* a six pack in the cooler. It would be in the bread basket now.

  260. N__B said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:50

    F and j – it’s a constant flow process, cooler to bread basket to porcelain.

  261. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:52

    Oh, and Anthony Weiner…

  262. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:52

    i realize my annoyance caused me to really eff up that simile…

  263. flotsam and jetsam said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:53

    We’re pickin’ up what you’re puttin’ down, sistah.

  264. Pupienus said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:53

    Have men ever been so scrutinized?

    Many have been, I must admit. And the ones i know of who have been, it’s even more critical. And bitchy and catty also too.

  265. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:53

    Oh, and Anthony Weiner…

    Oh he got scrutinized all right.

  266. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:55

    Oh he got scrutinized all right.

    oh, i think he really like scrutinizing himself…

  267. bbkf said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:55

    Many have been, I must admit. And the ones i know of who have been, it’s even more critical. And bitchy and catty also too.

    right?! i still LOVE will & grace…

  268. Major Kong said,

    August 10, 2012 at 23:59

    Men are scrutinized in other ways. Especially if you’re from a rural or blue-collar background you spend your life in fear of being considered “unmanly” or “effeminate”.

  269. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 11, 2012 at 0:04

    And just try having slightly misshapen antennae.

  270. Smut Clyde said,

    August 11, 2012 at 0:10

    A lot of Golden Age sidekicks wore masks [...] the 1930s radio hero Green Hornet had Kato
    It was radio. How do you know he was wearing a mask?
    It could have been a ballgag.

  271. Thread Bear said,

    August 11, 2012 at 0:17

    Have men ever been so scrutinized?

    Actually, yes they have. Anyone who reaches the elite level that olympic athletes reach is subject to this type of scrutiny. Their trainers and coaches constantly monitor their weight along with just about everything else. At this level, just a half pound of extra weight can make a big difference. I have heard in the past coaches or announcers speculating wether a certain male athlete is getting too flabby or not. So when an official from the Brittish Olympic team expresses concern that a member of the team is getting fat, it’s a bit different than the nonsense about Kate Upton. Now, that being said, the whole fuss over Gabby’s hair is utterly ridiculous.

  272. Pupienus said,

    August 11, 2012 at 0:19

    PENIS.

  273. Spearhafoc, who has been busy doing nothing in particular said,

    August 11, 2012 at 0:19

    Oop. You’re right. I just keep saying dumb things today.

  274. LittlePig said,

    August 11, 2012 at 0:21

    Reminds me of one of my son’s standard rejoinders:

    “My entertainment is puerile? Dude, you listened to a ventriloquist on the radio.”

  275. bbkf said,

    August 11, 2012 at 0:24

    PENIS.

    that is just…phallaliciously trashtastic? and she appears as though she’s old enough to know better…

  276. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 11, 2012 at 0:28

    and she appears as though she’s old enough to know better…

    Once the ink starts working its way into your brain you’re done for.

  277. Thread Bear said,

    August 11, 2012 at 0:57

    The 1% let us down again. From an ESPN website article:

    No sailing medals, no equestrian medals. The two sports that are most associated with rich elitists, and our rich elitists let us down. First their banker friends destroyed the economy and now no medals. Come on, sirs and madams. Pay for better sailing teachers or something.

  278. Oregon Beer Snob said,

    August 11, 2012 at 1:01

    PENIS

    Do I really need a disclaimer that it’s NSFW? No? Good.

  279. Snorghagen said,

    August 11, 2012 at 1:07

    PENIS.
    - – - – - – -
    that is just…phallaliciously trashtastic? and she appears as though she’s old enough to know better…

    She bears a resemblance to this dickhead.

  280. nipsen said,

    August 11, 2012 at 1:37

    Agree it isn’t really repulsive or homophobic. It’s just insane.

    Next thing she’s going to write will be… I don’t know.. human flesh recipes for successful and loving housewives. And how that cannibal hobby has nothing to do with homicides or fascination with death, or anything like that at all. Hahahah. Bwahahaha. Etc.

  281. bbkf said,

    August 11, 2012 at 1:47

    She bears a resemblance to this dickhead.

    that’s one creepy resemblence…one might say it’s uncanny…

  282. Major Kong said,

    August 11, 2012 at 2:45

    she appears as though she’s old enough to know better…

    Hah! Now that everybody, and I mean everybody, has tattoos and/or piercings my total lack thereof makes me an edgy nonconformist.

  283. kg said,

    August 11, 2012 at 2:46

    The pennis is strong this evening.

  284. Major Kong said,

    August 11, 2012 at 2:48

    That lady with the penis tattoos on her forehead is such a conformist she might as well just buy a minivan and move to the suburbs at this point.

  285. Thread Bear said,

    August 11, 2012 at 3:14

    Major Kong the nonconformist

  286. Major Kong said,

    August 11, 2012 at 3:20

    To me it seems like the equivalent of having a polyester leisure-suit permanently grafted to your body.

    Even if it somehow seems like a good idea now – I’m pretty sure a few years down the road you’re likely to regret it.

  287. Thread Bear said,

    August 11, 2012 at 3:31

    Another Tattoo

  288. kg said,

    August 11, 2012 at 3:36

    Hey f&J throw a suis in there and you’re all fancied up..

    Fucking Metal Church!

  289. Smut Clyde said,

    August 11, 2012 at 5:07

    DO NOT WANT.

  290. N__B said,

    August 11, 2012 at 5:10

    DO NOT WANT.

    You sure? Romney’s got some big BOOBS…

  291. Spearhafoc, who has been busy doing nothing in particular said,

    August 11, 2012 at 5:19

    Romney’s got some big BOOBS…

    Big boobs, you say? Man, I really need to get US citizenship so I can vote for this guy.

  292. N__B said,

    August 11, 2012 at 5:22

    He ain’t no ginger.

  293. Spearhafoc, who has been busy doing nothing in particular said,

    August 11, 2012 at 5:25

    Neither is Sofía Vergara, but I’d vote for her.

  294. Jeffraham Prestonian said,

    August 11, 2012 at 5:40

    Paul Ryan is the VP pick? Hoo-boi.
    .

  295. Pupienus said,

    August 11, 2012 at 5:49

    Ryan? Has there been a pronouncement from on high? I ain’t heerd nuttin definitival. I suppose he’s a better choice than Jindal but aside from shoring up Willard’s conservo creds, such as they are, he doesnt bring much to the table.

  296. N__B said,

    August 11, 2012 at 5:53

    He bringa to the table vast tracts of land possibilities for dem ads to scare the shit out the olds, who are the highest percentage voting demographic.

  297. Pupienus said,

    August 11, 2012 at 5:53

    HAHAHAHA. Romney asks O-man to take taxes, business record off the table.

    LOSER!

  298. N__B said,

    August 11, 2012 at 5:55

    “Stop hitting me!”

  299. Jeffraham Prestonian said,

    August 11, 2012 at 6:07

    Men are scrutinized in other ways. Especially if you’re from a rural or blue-collar background you spend your life in fear of being considered “unmanly” or “effeminate”.

    I ride a scooter. You can imagine!
    .

  300. Thread Bear said,

    August 11, 2012 at 6:43

    I ride a scooter. You can imagine!

    But that’s a Good Thing!

  301. Smut Clyde said,

    August 11, 2012 at 9:36

    “unmanly” or “effeminate”.
    Those are LONG WORDS.

  302. Smut Clyde said,

    August 11, 2012 at 9:39

    He bringa to the table possibilities for dem ads to scare the shit out the olds
    I think the idea is that the Democratic strategists will avoid anti-Ryan granny-starving ads because they are intimidated by the possibility that PoliFact will call them liars.

  303. Hogeye Grex said,

    August 11, 2012 at 11:30

    I guess Romney is conceding Florida.

  304. Hogeye Grex said,

    August 11, 2012 at 11:31

    Also, too.

  305. Big Bad Bald Bastard said,

    August 11, 2012 at 12:27

    I guess Romney is conceding Florida.

    But he’s getting major backing from catfood producers.

  306. Bozo the Cocksucker said,

    August 11, 2012 at 13:26

    Romney/Ryan 2012: The Whitest Guys U Know

  307. Heretic said,

    August 11, 2012 at 14:35

    I just don’t get it. She loses either way. The illogic in this one is way extreme.

    1. Homos are all perverts and shit, and therefore evil

    2. I have friends who are homos.

    3. Therefore, I cannot even manage my own life by my own moral standards.

    4. …….

    5. Profit!

    Seriously, in a depressed economy, how do these idiots have jobs? Cerb would probably say IT”S ALL PROJECTION, but I wonder. Turn them into soylent green already; at least it would have some use. Though it would probably poison you, it probably wouldn’t be worse than Taco Bell.

  308. LittlePig said,

    August 11, 2012 at 15:31

    I got nauseous (I mean literally) after turning on NPR and hearing the enthusiastic performance of fellatrix Linda Wertheimer. I barked out a wish for her regarding a rusty chainsaw, something I never recall doing for anyone but Rush Limbaugh..

    Like John Yoo wasn’t bad enough, now sociopathy is going nation-wide with Mr. ‘give all that social spending to the bankers to steal without consequence’.

  309. LittlePig said,

    August 11, 2012 at 15:34

    Brother Pierce stayed up ’til the wee hours to write this lovely paean. Helped my nausea considerably.

  310. Snorghagen said,

    August 11, 2012 at 15:46

    Romney/Ryan 2012: The Whitest Guys U Know

    And it’s endorsed by the political masterminds on the Wall Street Journal editorial page.

  311. LittlePig said,

    August 11, 2012 at 16:03

    Their electability is irrelevant. Ed Rollins, fer cryin’ out loud, notes correctly that Romney can’t win the election, but Obama can lose it. Nothing Mitt does has done jack for the polls because the only thing Mitt needs to be is not the en-eye-double-guh-urr in the Oval Office.

    And seeing zero mass media pushback against HateFest 2012 makes it all the more likely that hate will win the day. And neofeudalism will be made the law of the land.

  312. LittlePig said,

    August 11, 2012 at 16:05

    Though I guess law of the land goes away, too. Not that it hasn’t been missing in action since 2000.

  313. Major Kong said,

    August 11, 2012 at 16:07

    The fact that Romney has to campaign in Indiana in August makes me think he’s doing worse than you think.

    Once you get out of Indianapolis and Bloomington, Indiana is the kind of red that makes Texans scratch their heads and go “Dayum! You people sure are right wing!”

  314. N__B said,

    August 11, 2012 at 16:10

    And neofeudalism will be made the law of the land.

    “Neo”? You are an optimist.

  315. Snorghagen said,

    August 11, 2012 at 16:46

    And neofeudalism will be made the law of the land.
    - – - – - – -
    “Neo”? You are an optimist.

    If it’s good enough for Louis VII, it’s good enough for me.

  316. Snorghagen said,

    August 11, 2012 at 17:11

    NRO liveblogging the Ryan announcement:

    At 7:54 a.m., the loudspeakers begin to crackle, and Bob Seger’s “Hollywood Nights” starts to play. For the first song at the first Romney-Ryan rally, it’s an apt choice. “He was a Midwestern boy on his own,” Seger sings, with “those soft eyes so innocent and blue.” Steps away, a couple mothers sway to the tune.

    Via Balloon Juice/Betty Cracker

  317. Pupienus said,

    August 11, 2012 at 17:17

    Someone on NPR “he has the necessary experience … Ryan is a serious choice…” Palin goes ballistic in 3 … 2 … 1

  318. jurassicpork said,

    August 11, 2012 at 17:28

    Meanwhile, here’s the Tweet o’ the day regarding the Addams/Munster GOP ticket.

  319. Snorghagen said,

    August 11, 2012 at 17:48

    Meanwhile, here’s the definition o’ the day regarding blogwhoring.

  320. Pupienus said,

    August 11, 2012 at 17:56

    Goddamnit Linda Wertheimer there MUST be other news. Jeebus.

  321. Bitter Scribe said,

    August 11, 2012 at 18:13

    Many thanks to Mexico and Brazil for playing a fantastic soccer final in London and taking my mind off that insufferable Ayn Rand groupie for a morning.

  322. Bitter Scribe said,

    August 11, 2012 at 18:13

    Palin goes ballistic in 3 … 2 … 1

    Oh, fuck no, Palin will be behind the ticket all the way. As if anyone cares.

  323. A senior citizen said,

    August 11, 2012 at 19:17

    I’m scared. Very scared.

  324. Pupienus said,

    August 11, 2012 at 19:31

    INCONCEIVABLE!

    Jerry Sandusky’s attorney called new allegations that the former Penn State assistant football coach may have sent pornographic materials through the
    [...]
    “The whole concept of a porno ring, or whatever they’re saying, is, we believe, ridiculous,” Amendola said.
    [...]
    He said: “Jerry continues to maintain his innocence across the board. It’s unfathomable that this could be possible, but we’ll have to wait and see what they say.”

  325. Pupienus said,

    August 11, 2012 at 19:32

    Oops. The first excerpt should contain the word “unfathomable.”

  326. Flotsam & jesuistsam said,

    August 11, 2012 at 19:47

    I have decided that rhythmic gymnastics is the best Olympic event EVER. That is all.

  327. Bitter Scribe said,

    August 11, 2012 at 20:00

    I have decided that rhythmic gymnastics is the best Olympic event EVER. That is all.

    They do seem to have more than their share of hotties, don’t they?

  328. Spearhafoc, who has been busy doing nothing in particular said,

    August 11, 2012 at 20:05

    They do seem to have more than their share of hotties, don’t they?

    Pics or it didn’t happen!

  329. Bitter Scribe said,

    August 11, 2012 at 20:10

    Pics or it didn’t happen!

    We aim to please.

  330. Flotsam & jesuistsam said,

    August 11, 2012 at 20:12

    They do, and what they do with hoops is jaw-dropping amazing. Perfectly graceful, perfectly beautiful. I’m officially bowled over. I loved every bit of it.

  331. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 11, 2012 at 20:29

    Must I listen to this again?

  332. jim the heretical Anti-Cliff Lemming said,

    August 11, 2012 at 21:14

    OH NOEZ! Eric son Of Eric has a chronic rash in his tricolour Manties™ – plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose.

    Remember to always prune & fertilzer your team, libtards!

  333. Substance McGravitas said,

    August 11, 2012 at 21:40

    Today, the Romney camp sent out a talking points sheet claiming that while picking Paul Ryan, Romney had his own budget plans. This is delusional and not credible spin. You pick Paul Ryan, you defend his budget. It is that simple.

    Okey-doke Erick.

  334. Bitter Scribe said,

    August 11, 2012 at 21:53

    You pick Paul Ryan, you defend his budget.

    PLEASE GOD MAKE IT SO

  335. Major Kong said,

    August 11, 2012 at 22:04

    Today, the Romney camp sent out a talking points sheet claiming that while picking Paul Ryan, Romney had his own budget plans.

    The guy can’t even pick a VP without flip-flopping on it.

  336. vacuumslayer said,

    August 11, 2012 at 22:20

    I’m salivating.

  337. N__B said,

    August 11, 2012 at 22:33

    I’m salivating.

    Is Dudeskull sitting in the sun and getting that sautéed-veal smell?

  338. Gary Ruppert said,

    August 11, 2012 at 22:44

    The fact is, you lazy liberals and minorites better get used to, it, the partys over for you when Romney/Ryan take over and make America free again.

  339. Bitter Scribe said,

    August 11, 2012 at 22:53

    In Illinois, politicians named Ryan have not had much luck.

  340. Hogeye Grex said,

    August 12, 2012 at 0:12

    Like John Yoo wasn’t bad enough, now sociopathy is going nation-wide with Mr. ‘give all that social spending to the bankers to steal without consequence’.

    America has become a Moral Hazard superfund site.

  341. John Revolta said,

    August 12, 2012 at 0:49

    That almost sounds like Real Gary!

    Guess I better bookmark that shit, just to be onna safeside.

  342. Seriously, NOT the Doughy Pantload said,

    August 12, 2012 at 3:07

    “Karen” seems to have a little “problem” with quotation “marks.”

  343. Jeffraham Prestonian said,

    August 12, 2012 at 4:25

    The fact that Romney has to campaign in Indiana in August makes me think he’s doing worse than you think.

    As in, “completely fucking fucked, and they know the other shoe will drop in about nine weeks-fucked”?
    .

  344. Jeffraham Prestonian said,

    August 12, 2012 at 4:30

    Meanwhile, here’s the definition o’ the day regarding blogwhoring.

    I don’t blogwhore. I catpimp.
    .

  345. Nym said,

    August 12, 2012 at 4:37

    Heh. I know something about needy kitties, Jeff. Ours came with the house we moved into three years ago because the previous owners just up and left her. She’s calmed down considerably but she was quite the fuzzy ball of abandonment issues those first few months…

  346. Jeffraham Prestonian said,

    August 12, 2012 at 4:42

    Heh. I know something about needy kitties, Jeff. Ours came with the house we moved into three years ago because the previous owners just up and left her. She’s calmed down considerably but she was quite the fuzzy ball of abandonment issues those first few months…

    Cats choose us… sometimes out of need, but whenever and why-ever they do, they never fail to return that love many times over.
    .

  347. Major Kong said,

    August 12, 2012 at 5:46

    Cats choose us

    Very true.

    When I went to the shelter to pick out a cat, this one six-month-old kitten kept meowing and sticking her paw out of the cage when I walked by. When I asked them to let her out she immediately jumped up on my shoulder. She’s been my friend for 14 years now.

  348. Bitter Scribe said,

    August 12, 2012 at 5:53

    That almost sounds like Real Gary!

    Does Real Gary exist, or is he just shadows on a cave wall?

  349. Snorghagen said,

    August 12, 2012 at 6:04

    Cats choose us… sometimes out of need, but whenever and why-ever they do, they never fail to return that love many times over.

    Don’t bet on it, anthropoids.

    (Actually, I like cats… but I couldn’t resist.)

  350. John M. Burt said,

    August 12, 2012 at 6:51

    Clearly, it is time to retire the word “homophobe” and replace it with one harder to misunderstand, such as “homosexualocidal maniac”.

  351. Whale Chowder said,

    August 12, 2012 at 7:35

    (Actually, I like cats… but I couldn’t resist.)

    It would indeed be frightening to be attacked by furred furries from hell or Des Moines for that matter.

  352. Deep in the heart of Dark Matter said,

    August 12, 2012 at 7:49

    http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/images/pia16042_Sell-4SIDEBYSIDE-br2.jpg

  353. Big Bad Bald Bastard said,

    August 12, 2012 at 9:14

    Don’t bet on it, anthropoids.

    Still not as terrifying as the “Slashed by Paul Ryan’s BudgeT” cover.

  354. Cerberus said,

    August 12, 2012 at 10:09

    New post.

  355. Own Your Case » Blue Morning Glory Flexible TPU Gel Case for said,

    August 14, 2012 at 10:18

    [...] Sadly, No! » Why Do The Effing Homos Keep Saying I'm Homophobic? [...]

Leave a Comment

  • Things of Interest

  • Meta Goodness

  • Clunkers

  • httpbl_stats()