Just wait until Heartland Law Firm gets through with you.

…

August 19, 2006 at 8:31

I wonder if he is the same nutjob that goes around “correcting� people (�Wrong. It never happened�) when they mention the time when Rush Limbaugh implied that Chelsea Clinton was the Whitehouse dog on his TV show, by posting a section of a transcript of a completely different episode? That guy has even deleted the Wikipedia entry about the Chelsea/Limbaugh episode.

Can’t edit my memory though; I saw that episode of Limbaugh’s short lived show. ”

I AM that guy who deleted that entry, and you are a liar. You NEVER saw that episode. Its amazing. At the time the show aired, liberals swore off watching the show. Now when they come up with this innaccurate description of eventsd on Rush’s show, then corrected with what really happened, instead of admitting their mistake, they LIE about having seen the episode themselves. Now, I can believe liberals watching his show from time to time when it was still on the air, but it seems that all of you, out of thousands of episodes (his tv show was on the air five days a week for 9-10 months out of the year for four seasons), coincidentally saw that very same episode. Yet I cannot find a single conservative, who watched the show religiously, who claims to have seen those phony version of events. Only liberals, or people who hate limbaugh, claim to have seen it.

Cant edit my memory either. I didnt miss an episode, and it never happened as you described

“by posting a section of a transcript of a completely different episode? ”

Baloney. That transcript is the ONLY episode in which this incident occured. Your version of events never happened. It is a lie that GREW out of the real and original version of events shown in the transcript. But if I’m wrong, or lying, then try to prove me wrong. Go try to find the correct transcript. Better yet, a video (Rush sold each and every episode of his show on video). You will note that in all the years you libs have been trying to lie about what happened on the show, NONE of you have provided either a transcript or video of events.

Do you have a function here besides boring the piss out of everyone with your clueless pseudo-soliological pontifications? Because I notice not everyone here agrees or gets along all the time. Or most of the time. For example, Rush doesn’t totally suck and the Red Sox do. See?

Did you spill coffee on your S,N! notes and so had to make do with your Atrios card?

Thppth!

like the idea of a Top Trollz listing, perhaps a top 5 of all time, since we have a fairly limited field to work with.

I second that notion. Obviously Gare-Bear and Annieangel are our chief contenders, but let us not forget Dr. BLT, all those brain-dead neo-Nazis, and the overly-defensive libertarians that have popped up from time to time.

Marq! I think you’re onto something here. The proprieters of this fine outpost in outer Left Blogistan ought to keep a running ranking of the regular trolls. Kind of like the Standings, but more like the Wild Card race.

Could we then have Fantasy Trolling Leagues? Mayhap get some of the other objectively pro-terrorist blogs to rank their trolls as well?

Which Gary is more ‘real’: The ‘real’ Gary Ruppert (if he ‘really’ exists), or the self-replicating cultural code that’s replaced him?

mikey

robotslave said, “With this in mind, it should be clear that so long as the discussion is centered not on the topics preferred by the leaders, preachers, or Primary Site Contributors, but rather on the troll’s arguments, the troll itself, the particulars of the troll’s motivations, or on troll theory generally, the troll is winning, and trolling as a tactic is being proven effective.”

So, kinda like every post in this thread? Of course, the official subject of this post is teh Garybot, so this is the one post he can’t totally disrupt, though I am a bit surprised that he hasn’t popped in here and spouted some nonsense about Lamont hiring a former GOP operative, thus proving he’s out to destroy teh Democrats (Convienently ignoring the fact that the “independant” Lieberman campaign has hired a current GOP pollster and is sharing info with them!). You know–that kind of crap.
Show up soon, Gare Bear! I want to hear you spin how Duke Cunningham dropping off a duffel bag containing $36, 000 in cash and his dirty BVDs on his estranged wife’s driveway upon the eve of his arrest will really just hurt the Democrats, ‘cos it proves that they’re too [something]. I really want to hear crazy-ass stories like that!
Though I still think Dr. BLT was Sadly, No!’s best troll evah! Garebot just doesn’t know how to play to an audience. OK, arguably, neither did BLT, but at least he seemed to have a rudimentary sense of humor (to go with his other underdeveloped emotions and senses). In the real Gary? Totally lacking. Yet another way to spot a faux-Gary–any humor, whatsoever, with the possible exception of completely inadvertent funny. But that’s hard to prove.
And Jose Chung is really awful, like something sharted out by my dog after a day of rousting about in the woods. Ick.

Certain trolls actually become Part of the Community — Gary is like the homeless guy singing tunelessly on the platform that you always slip a buck just because you know he’s trying so hard for so long for so little result.

In other words, Gary is to the Sadly, No! community what Leslie Cochran is to Austin, TX?

Can’t edit my memory though; I saw that episode of Limbaugh’s short lived show.

I think that’s one of the ways you can tell when it’s one of the numerous fake Garys. There are other ways, but I’ve already said too much!

I am not sure the ‘real’ Gary Ruppert even comments here any more. Or if it ever did. The latest Garybot posts, for example, just don’t seem to have that humourless, charmless lack of affect I remember from the Gary Ruppert of old.

Get off my lawn, etc.