Comments on: Could this be the future Monsieur Amber Pawlik?

By: serial offender

serial offender — Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:04:47 +0000

I had a college roommate exactly like this guy.
Nathan will be out of the closet within a year.

By: DL

DL — Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:45:33 +0000

“Nathan isn’t preoccupied with nipples or vaginas…”

Or haircuts, apparently.

By: JGil

JGil — Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:22:01 +0000

I believe the merit badge is actually for carpet munching.

By: nolo

nolo — Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:57:56 +0000

I say we take up a collection and start sending this brilliant young man cigarettes by the caseload.

By: Thurber Hamm

Thurber Hamm — Wed, 18 Feb 2004 06:08:12 +0000

“brought to life in a small latex penis-glove. ” Good grief. I don’t want to get all Freudian on y’all, but…….. I’m thinking his real issue is, well, his penis size (or the lack thereof). This would account for his vow of celibacy until marriage, you know, “Ladies, you must buy the pecker sight unseen”. Sad, so sad.

By: matt

matt — Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:56:29 +0000

they let ya smoke in the army…oh if only having condoms meant you got some sex

By: Frederick

Frederick — Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:40:32 +0000

Not Girl Scout Cookies of Lesbianism (NGSCOL.)

Do the Girl Scouts offer a merit badge in muff diving now?

By: Frederick

Frederick — Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:32:02 +0000

“waristheanswer”? Oh, that’s cute. Why doesn’t the patriotic little fuck enlist and go over to save Iraq? Oh, I guess that’s for the working-class grunts, just as it was in Dubya’s day.

By: raj

raj — Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:16:35 +0000

This has to be funny as heck. I clicked the link (re “Nathan”) and got a bio

>Nathan Burchfiel is a freshman broadcast journalism major at the University of Maryland. He is a member of the College Republicans and frequently contributes to the Diamondback. Check out his new clothing line.

Check out HIS NEW CLOTHING LINE? Give me a break.

The link went to http://www.cafeshops.com/waristheanswer

He’s selling stuff.

By: Peanut

Peanut — Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:03:29 +0000

RAs are required to make condoms available for free to any student requesting them. This service shows blatant favoritism toward the sexually active and makes no effort to provide an equal service to the abstinent…

Nathan’s probably not the first goof to assume a free condom carries a guarantee of getting laid. Ooh, sorry kid, that you have to do on your own. (I assume he’a already familiar with having sex on his own. *cough*)

I hope he cheers up when learns he can use his free condom in an abstinence-friendly way, such as making balloon animals or packing heroin for international mules. Or, he can be an abstinence purist: go to the free-condom office, demand nothing (and get it.) I have no idea how to lighten Nathan’s burden of seeing other people living their lives without asking his permission.

By: merl

merl — Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:49:41 +0000

They could give him copies of the Old Testament with all of the begats highlighted. That should do it for this sad sob.

By: Daniel

Daniel — Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:40:14 +0000

Frederick: they already give him free Internet access :-)

By: Frederick

Frederick — Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:50:36 +0000

What a frigging maroon. What does he propose — that the university give him free copies of Playboy to assist him in jerking off?

By: Daniel

Daniel — Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:13:02 +0000

off-topic, does anybody know who makes money from the “I’m giving up George Bush for Lent” shirts?

I didn’t see any info at [link]http://www.cafeshops.com/lent[/link] and would be more inclined to buy if the proceeds went somewhere Blue.

By: p mac

p mac — Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:42:02 +0000

But, damn, I do like the cargo-cult model of hunan sexuality: buy condoms, and you too can have some good “man-whore” sex. Ah, if only it were that simple!

By: Linnaeus

Linnaeus — Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:40:41 +0000

This is one of the poorest arguments I’ve ever read, and I’ve read quite a few bad ones, including many of my own.

Just what “service” does this man think that he, as one who has chosen abstinence from sex, ought to get? How does the fact that condoms are available, upon request, infringe upon his rights? What is he being compelled to do or not do as a result of his celibacy. The fact that he can’t smoke in his room has absolutely nothing to do with sex.

He speaks of hypocrisy, but it’s interesting to note that he effectively blames the university for sexual “promiscuity”. So let me get this straight: when it’s something I don’t like, it’s someone else’s fault. But when someone else has a problem, it’s that person’s fault.

Selective “personal responsibility.” Okay, I get it now.

By: p mac

p mac — Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:39:40 +0000

“So, as a smoker who has made the decision to remain abstinent until marriage, I’m told I can’t enjoy something that makes me happy in the comfort of my own room. My roommate, on the other hand, a non-smoking man-whore, is encouraged to have as much sex as possible under the administration’s false sense of security brought to life in a small latex penis-glove. ”

Just what exactly *is* this guy smoking?

Who cares about free cigarettes? We need free weed!