<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;It&#8217;s Easy For Me But Not For Thee&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JABbering Stooge :: Israel GOOD! Muslims BAD! :: August :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-72468</link>
		<dc:creator>JABbering Stooge :: Israel GOOD! Muslims BAD! :: August :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-72468</guid>
		<description>[...] Yet, somehow, I&#8217;m an anti-Semite for daring to question Israel&#8217;s foriegn policy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yet, somehow, I&#8217;m an anti-Semite for daring to question Israel&#8217;s foriegn policy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bistroist</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-67260</link>
		<dc:creator>Bistroist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-67260</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I think Mr. Bike Shop has struck gold with his suggestion; &lt;em&gt;Oswaldsâ€™s Algorithm or sumpinâ€™&lt;/em&gt; seems to be exatcly the right name for whatever strained excuse for thought passes for coherent logic among the wingers these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I think Mr. Bike Shop has struck gold with his suggestion; <em>Oswaldsâ€™s Algorithm or sumpinâ€™</em> seems to be exatcly the right name for whatever strained excuse for thought passes for coherent logic among the wingers these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bistroist</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-67258</link>
		<dc:creator>Bistroist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-67258</guid>
		<description>Retardo scripsit:
&lt;em&gt;, according to the Bible,&lt;/em&gt;

Ah, well, that&#039;s more or less the problem in a nutshell right there, innit? The Old Testament is, at best, a rather unreliable source for history. While biblical archaeology has confirmed some of its claims (names of rulers, geographical locations, that sort of thing), it has also cast severe doubt on some of the most crucial events depicted in the OT, eg. the Egyptian captivity, the unification of the North and South Kingdom, the siege of Jericho, etc.

(I&#039;m not an archaeologist, mind, and won&#039;t pretend I know anything about the history of the region until, say, about two and a half millenia ago.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retardo scripsit:<br />
<em>, according to the Bible,</em></p>
<p>Ah, well, that&#8217;s more or less the problem in a nutshell right there, innit? The Old Testament is, at best, a rather unreliable source for history. While biblical archaeology has confirmed some of its claims (names of rulers, geographical locations, that sort of thing), it has also cast severe doubt on some of the most crucial events depicted in the OT, eg. the Egyptian captivity, the unification of the North and South Kingdom, the siege of Jericho, etc.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;m not an archaeologist, mind, and won&#8217;t pretend I know anything about the history of the region until, say, about two and a half millenia ago.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo's Bike Shop</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-67197</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo's Bike Shop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 03:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-67197</guid>
		<description>Wow:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;i&gt;I would suggest that there is a part of the online left which is so viciously anti-Israel that moderates have been intimidated into silence. &lt;/i&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We need an antonym for &quot;Occam&#039;s Razor.&quot;


Oswalds&#039;s Algorithm or sumpin&#039;





o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow:</p>
<blockquote><p>
<i>I would suggest that there is a part of the online left which is so viciously anti-Israel that moderates have been intimidated into silence. </i>
</p></blockquote>
<p>We need an antonym for &#8220;Occam&#8217;s Razor.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oswalds&#8217;s Algorithm or sumpin&#8217;</p>
<p>o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sadly, No! &#187; The Collective Guilt &#8220;Continuum&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-67177</link>
		<dc:creator>Sadly, No! &#187; The Collective Guilt &#8220;Continuum&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-67177</guid>
		<description>[...] Dershowitz used to have a fine mind but now, if Israel does it &#8212; no matter how depraved it is &#8212; he feels obliged to justify it. Torture, murdering civilians &#8212; if Israel set up Adam Yoshida&#8217;s precious &#8220;human-sized microwaves&#8221; and melted Palis wholesale (basically Zyklon B updated as a fine Kenmore with stainless steel appliques and also no doubt handy for cooking those extra-large bags of butcher-porn popcorn), Dershowitz would find a way to make that legal and moral, too. And what&#8217;s good for Israel is, of course, good for the U.S. Or, put another way, what one country/in-group has done in monstrous abuse of the filthy wogs/out-group, might be fun for another country to try. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dershowitz used to have a fine mind but now, if Israel does it &#8212; no matter how depraved it is &#8212; he feels obliged to justify it. Torture, murdering civilians &#8212; if Israel set up Adam Yoshida&#8217;s precious &#8220;human-sized microwaves&#8221; and melted Palis wholesale (basically Zyklon B updated as a fine Kenmore with stainless steel appliques and also no doubt handy for cooking those extra-large bags of butcher-porn popcorn), Dershowitz would find a way to make that legal and moral, too. And what&#8217;s good for Israel is, of course, good for the U.S. Or, put another way, what one country/in-group has done in monstrous abuse of the filthy wogs/out-group, might be fun for another country to try. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott C.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-67155</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-67155</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;connoisieurs of butcher porn&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s the only phrase I&#039;ve ever seen with the literary grace and dexterity to sum up the couchbound wingers&#039; fetishistic attachment to distant warfare.  Kudos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>connoisieurs of butcher porn</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the only phrase I&#8217;ve ever seen with the literary grace and dexterity to sum up the couchbound wingers&#8217; fetishistic attachment to distant warfare.  Kudos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retardo Montalban</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-67149</link>
		<dc:creator>Retardo Montalban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-67149</guid>
		<description>Henry:

Best I remember from by Xtian days it was, according to the Bible, the &quot;Canaanites&quot;, many tribes who in aggregate I believe would be proto-Phoenecians. Which in turn means that the Lebanese have probably the oldest claim there. The Philistines, whom David famously conquered and Samson famously crushed, were a Canaanite group culturally related to those up north (Phoenicianites).

But then when Yahweh &quot;re-gave&quot; Canaan to the Jews after the Egyptian captivity, some people had filled up the empty spaces. One such group was the Amelekites, whom Yahweh gave Yeshua permission to mass-murder. And so he did to the last man woman and child, which is why pieces of abominable shit like Rabbi Kahani ressurected the term and applied it to the Palis.

Ahh, but I can hear the wingnuts now: just as the Phoenicians/Philistines sacrificed babies to Ba&#039;al, and therefore desrved divine slaughter, so too do the Muslims who sacrifice their babies to Allah in the form of suicide bombers! Never mind that for the first example, Yahweh had also asked for human sacrifice (allowing Abraham to spare Isaac at the last momemnt) and never mind in the latetr example that Israel drafts their children in part to &quot;defend&quot; occupied territory and murder rock-throwing children on the other side who don&#039;t like being conquered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry:</p>
<p>Best I remember from by Xtian days it was, according to the Bible, the &#8220;Canaanites&#8221;, many tribes who in aggregate I believe would be proto-Phoenecians. Which in turn means that the Lebanese have probably the oldest claim there. The Philistines, whom David famously conquered and Samson famously crushed, were a Canaanite group culturally related to those up north (Phoenicianites).</p>
<p>But then when Yahweh &#8220;re-gave&#8221; Canaan to the Jews after the Egyptian captivity, some people had filled up the empty spaces. One such group was the Amelekites, whom Yahweh gave Yeshua permission to mass-murder. And so he did to the last man woman and child, which is why pieces of abominable shit like Rabbi Kahani ressurected the term and applied it to the Palis.</p>
<p>Ahh, but I can hear the wingnuts now: just as the Phoenicians/Philistines sacrificed babies to Ba&#8217;al, and therefore desrved divine slaughter, so too do the Muslims who sacrifice their babies to Allah in the form of suicide bombers! Never mind that for the first example, Yahweh had also asked for human sacrifice (allowing Abraham to spare Isaac at the last momemnt) and never mind in the latetr example that Israel drafts their children in part to &#8220;defend&#8221; occupied territory and murder rock-throwing children on the other side who don&#8217;t like being conquered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Holland</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-67127</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Holland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-67127</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve searched for this before but my Googling skillz must blow goats because I haven&#039;t been able to find a good answer, so I&#039;ll throw it out to the S,N! crowd:

Who was there first?  I mean, at the start, thousands of years ago, who was on the land that is now called Lebanon, Israel and Syria (roughly) first, the forebears of the Palestinians or the Israelis?  My fuzzy knowledge leans towards &quot;the Israelites came from further east and moved to the sea after the Palestinians&quot;.  The reason I ask is because I think that&#039;s the basic question, who was there first?   I realize that no pat &quot;Pilgrims landed in 1620....&quot; neat and tidy narrative is possible, with that area being a major trade crossroads and all, but any insight that anyone can provide would be really appreciated.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve searched for this before but my Googling skillz must blow goats because I haven&#8217;t been able to find a good answer, so I&#8217;ll throw it out to the S,N! crowd:</p>
<p>Who was there first?  I mean, at the start, thousands of years ago, who was on the land that is now called Lebanon, Israel and Syria (roughly) first, the forebears of the Palestinians or the Israelis?  My fuzzy knowledge leans towards &#8220;the Israelites came from further east and moved to the sea after the Palestinians&#8221;.  The reason I ask is because I think that&#8217;s the basic question, who was there first?   I realize that no pat &#8220;Pilgrims landed in 1620&#8230;.&#8221; neat and tidy narrative is possible, with that area being a major trade crossroads and all, but any insight that anyone can provide would be really appreciated.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Crapture</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-67116</link>
		<dc:creator>The Crapture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-67116</guid>
		<description>my biggest gripe with our (frequently evangelical) right-wingers on the subject of Israel is that they don&#039;t really love Israel or the Jewish people, they only back Israel on the premise that if Israel becomes embroiled in an all out war with its neighbours, it will be the catalyst to force their God&#039;s hand and fulfill their fucknutty dream of being raptured away</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my biggest gripe with our (frequently evangelical) right-wingers on the subject of Israel is that they don&#8217;t really love Israel or the Jewish people, they only back Israel on the premise that if Israel becomes embroiled in an all out war with its neighbours, it will be the catalyst to force their God&#8217;s hand and fulfill their fucknutty dream of being raptured away</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-67044</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-67044</guid>
		<description>Okay, I refuse to buy in to this belief that liberals aren&#039;t blogging about Lebanon. I am, and almost every blog I go to is. I think maybe some very large lib bloggers have ceded their responsibility to blog about such a major issue, but every single blog that I like to visit has touched on this issue and as far as I can tell, none of them are worried about being called anti-semites (I&#039;m not.)

I don&#039;t know where this meme came from, but right-wingers are peddling it and even some in the media are buying, and I think it&#039;s a load of crap. I&#039;m not into the &quot;Let&#039;s not talk about this because it helps the enemy&quot; school of blogging, but I am into the &quot;Let&#039;s not talk about this because it&#039;s not really true&quot; approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I refuse to buy in to this belief that liberals aren&#8217;t blogging about Lebanon. I am, and almost every blog I go to is. I think maybe some very large lib bloggers have ceded their responsibility to blog about such a major issue, but every single blog that I like to visit has touched on this issue and as far as I can tell, none of them are worried about being called anti-semites (I&#8217;m not.)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where this meme came from, but right-wingers are peddling it and even some in the media are buying, and I think it&#8217;s a load of crap. I&#8217;m not into the &#8220;Let&#8217;s not talk about this because it helps the enemy&#8221; school of blogging, but I am into the &#8220;Let&#8217;s not talk about this because it&#8217;s not really true&#8221; approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mudge</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-67037</link>
		<dc:creator>Mudge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-67037</guid>
		<description>Comrade Billmon a Communist?

He would certainly be in a gulag by now..He knows 1984 by heart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comrade Billmon a Communist?</p>
<p>He would certainly be in a gulag by now..He knows 1984 by heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becca</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-67000</link>
		<dc:creator>Becca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-67000</guid>
		<description>Sorry, that was supposed to be &quot;I personally &lt;i&gt;avoid&lt;/i&gt; using the word Israel&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, that was supposed to be &#8220;I personally <i>avoid</i> using the word Israel&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becca</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-66999</link>
		<dc:creator>Becca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-66999</guid>
		<description>Hear fucking hear. Your post neatly summarized why I personally using the word &quot;Israel&quot; in mixed company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear fucking hear. Your post neatly summarized why I personally using the word &#8220;Israel&#8221; in mixed company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Sidhe</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-66997</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Sidhe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-66997</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I guess the idea is that the crazy lefties far outnumber the reasonable moderates.&lt;/i&gt;

The crazy lefties don&#039;t have to outnumber the reasonable moderates, which would imply that a lot of people find some merit in the crazy lefty worldview, and we know they don&#039;t because on those occasions where they&#039;re not forcing straight people to get gay married and declaring that all sex is rape and discriminating against whitey, they&#039;re really a small bunch of political dead-enders, and America is seeing through their extremist positions. 

Indeed, all that is required for the crazy lefties to intimidate the reasonable moderates is for the crazy lefties to, simply put, engage in a form of rhetorical terrorism. Of course, since it works, not only are the lefties terrorists, but the moderates are appeasers, and it&#039;s only the far right that&#039;s virtuous at all.

That&#039;s probably why we&#039;re always oppressing them with our tiny, tiny numbers and our marginalized views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I guess the idea is that the crazy lefties far outnumber the reasonable moderates.</i></p>
<p>The crazy lefties don&#8217;t have to outnumber the reasonable moderates, which would imply that a lot of people find some merit in the crazy lefty worldview, and we know they don&#8217;t because on those occasions where they&#8217;re not forcing straight people to get gay married and declaring that all sex is rape and discriminating against whitey, they&#8217;re really a small bunch of political dead-enders, and America is seeing through their extremist positions. </p>
<p>Indeed, all that is required for the crazy lefties to intimidate the reasonable moderates is for the crazy lefties to, simply put, engage in a form of rhetorical terrorism. Of course, since it works, not only are the lefties terrorists, but the moderates are appeasers, and it&#8217;s only the far right that&#8217;s virtuous at all.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s probably why we&#8217;re always oppressing them with our tiny, tiny numbers and our marginalized views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-66969</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-66969</guid>
		<description>is oxblog affiliated with OX-HO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is oxblog affiliated with OX-HO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-66953</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-66953</guid>
		<description>I had no idea anybody still read Oxblog.  To those who do: stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no idea anybody still read Oxblog.  To those who do: stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberal Avenger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Don&#8217;t Let the Name Fool You</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-66952</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberal Avenger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Don&#8217;t Let the Name Fool You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-66952</guid>
		<description>[...] Retardo gets it exactly right, both here  I would suggest that, “clearly”, lefties are hesitant to talk about Israel because: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Retardo gets it exactly right, both here  I would suggest that, “clearly”, lefties are hesitant to talk about Israel because: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sexy Sadie</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-66951</link>
		<dc:creator>Sexy Sadie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-66951</guid>
		<description>My guess is more along the lines of: liberals tend to not think in such stark black-and-white terms as right-wingers and, as such, recognize that there is no simple equation such as Israel=good, Palestine/Lebanon=evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is more along the lines of: liberals tend to not think in such stark black-and-white terms as right-wingers and, as such, recognize that there is no simple equation such as Israel=good, Palestine/Lebanon=evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demogenes Aristophanes</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-66943</link>
		<dc:creator>Demogenes Aristophanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-66943</guid>
		<description>Sorry, &quot;Cooking with Misha&quot; ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, &#8220;Cooking with Misha&#8221; &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demogenes Aristophanes</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3361.html#comment-66942</link>
		<dc:creator>Demogenes Aristophanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003361.html#comment-66942</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;That always struck me as a classic example of projection. Indeed, it is the wingnuts who only understand force; thatâ€™s why they advocate it for ills real and imagined. If all you have is a hammerâ€¦&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah, I have this idea for a sketch called &quot;Cooking for Misha&quot;, where you see him on a standard TV kitchen set, and he pulls out all the ingredients for some dish, then proceeds to smash them all together with a hammer, the only tool he has or ever uses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That always struck me as a classic example of projection. Indeed, it is the wingnuts who only understand force; thatâ€™s why they advocate it for ills real and imagined. If all you have is a hammerâ€¦</i></p>
<p>Yeah, I have this idea for a sketch called &#8220;Cooking for Misha&#8221;, where you see him on a standard TV kitchen set, and he pulls out all the ingredients for some dish, then proceeds to smash them all together with a hammer, the only tool he has or ever uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

