<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Boxer Shorts Have My Name And It Says Romney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LanceThruster</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1094011</link>
		<dc:creator>LanceThruster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 01:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1094011</guid>
		<description>Just as long as we&#039;re not attacked by station wagons with dogs strapped to the roofs. Those dogs not frozen to death would be meaner than the junkyard variety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as long as we&#8217;re not attacked by station wagons with dogs strapped to the roofs. Those dogs not frozen to death would be meaner than the junkyard variety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1093642</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1093642</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s only fair to get both sides of the issue: http://mittromneycentral.com/2010/07/08/romneys-new-op-ed-on-start-ignites-flurry-of-debate-support-and-criticism/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s only fair to get both sides of the issue: <a href="http://mittromneycentral.com/2010/07/08/romneys-new-op-ed-on-start-ignites-flurry-of-debate-support-and-criticism/" rel="nofollow">http://mittromneycentral.com/2010/07/08/romneys-new-op-ed-on-start-ignites-flurry-of-debate-support-and-criticism/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Trotsky, Pope-in-Avignon</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1093269</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Trotsky, Pope-in-Avignon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 04:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1093269</guid>
		<description>Look, I&#039;ll just ask you all lamenting the probability of Romney making it to Presidential nominee to remember one thing. The Republicans still represent the people that thought the Pope was going to make JFK surrender the United States over to the Vatican.

Mitt Romney may have glorious hair, but I will bet there&#039;ll still be enough bigoted Americans unwilling to trust anyone but a good Protestant to represent the nation in the near future to blow his chances out of the water every time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, I&#8217;ll just ask you all lamenting the probability of Romney making it to Presidential nominee to remember one thing. The Republicans still represent the people that thought the Pope was going to make JFK surrender the United States over to the Vatican.</p>
<p>Mitt Romney may have glorious hair, but I will bet there&#8217;ll still be enough bigoted Americans unwilling to trust anyone but a good Protestant to represent the nation in the near future to blow his chances out of the water every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenician in a time of Romans</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1093266</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenician in a time of Romans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 04:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1093266</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There was a program back in the 60s called Skybolt, which would have mounted long-range ballistic missiles on B-52s…&lt;/i&gt;

I imagine the accuracy on those things would be fan-fucking-tastic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There was a program back in the 60s called Skybolt, which would have mounted long-range ballistic missiles on B-52s…</i></p>
<p>I imagine the accuracy on those things would be fan-fucking-tastic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deering</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1093202</link>
		<dc:creator>deering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1093202</guid>
		<description>&quot;My two-year-old memories of that campaign tell me that McCain only got the nomination because he was everyone’s second choice. And even then, the GOP base hated him so much he had to throw his buddy Rape Gurney Joe overboard and pick Caribou Barbie as his running mate.&quot;

Ah, but you&#039;ll note that McCain made a concession to the base, which is what Mitt (or any GOP potential) would have to do. And even if he hadn&#039;t, do you _really_ think the Repub. voters would have stood by and a black man becoming president? 

&quot;He’s go the requisite white skin and that’s plenty good enough for Republicans these days. His “CEO experience” in the “business community” will be more than enough for Independents and racist Democrats.&quot; 

Yep. Corollary to what I wrote above: never, ever underestimate the average conservative&#039;s programming when they are desperate for a potential Big Daddy John Wayne who might to save them from the Eeeeevil Civilization-Destroying Black Man. That and their lockstep thinking (and failing any other prospect coming out of nowhere), are perfect predictors of how they roll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My two-year-old memories of that campaign tell me that McCain only got the nomination because he was everyone’s second choice. And even then, the GOP base hated him so much he had to throw his buddy Rape Gurney Joe overboard and pick Caribou Barbie as his running mate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, but you&#8217;ll note that McCain made a concession to the base, which is what Mitt (or any GOP potential) would have to do. And even if he hadn&#8217;t, do you _really_ think the Repub. voters would have stood by and a black man becoming president? </p>
<p>&#8220;He’s go the requisite white skin and that’s plenty good enough for Republicans these days. His “CEO experience” in the “business community” will be more than enough for Independents and racist Democrats.&#8221; </p>
<p>Yep. Corollary to what I wrote above: never, ever underestimate the average conservative&#8217;s programming when they are desperate for a potential Big Daddy John Wayne who might to save them from the Eeeeevil Civilization-Destroying Black Man. That and their lockstep thinking (and failing any other prospect coming out of nowhere), are perfect predictors of how they roll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PopeRatzo</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1093137</link>
		<dc:creator>PopeRatzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1093137</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s silly that you would think Romney&#039;s idiotic op-ed would dash his chances to be elected president.  

He&#039;s go the requisite white skin and that&#039;s plenty good enough for Republicans these days.  His &quot;CEO experience&quot; in the &quot;business community&quot; will be more than enough for Independents and racist Democrats.  

If he could ever make it through the GOP&#039;s primary process, and there are signs that he&#039;s not pant-shitting crazy enough for that, he could beat Obama in a head-to-head election with no trouble, especially since the progressives have thrown in the towel and plan to go into full-tantrum mode and watch the Democrats get slaughtered in November and the Media is buying into the notion that because the stimulus was supposed to stop unemployment at 8 percent, and it didn&#039;t, that Obama needs to become the sacrificial Negro.

Watch how fucked up things are going to become after November.  And it will be our fault, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s silly that you would think Romney&#8217;s idiotic op-ed would dash his chances to be elected president.  </p>
<p>He&#8217;s go the requisite white skin and that&#8217;s plenty good enough for Republicans these days.  His &#8220;CEO experience&#8221; in the &#8220;business community&#8221; will be more than enough for Independents and racist Democrats.  </p>
<p>If he could ever make it through the GOP&#8217;s primary process, and there are signs that he&#8217;s not pant-shitting crazy enough for that, he could beat Obama in a head-to-head election with no trouble, especially since the progressives have thrown in the towel and plan to go into full-tantrum mode and watch the Democrats get slaughtered in November and the Media is buying into the notion that because the stimulus was supposed to stop unemployment at 8 percent, and it didn&#8217;t, that Obama needs to become the sacrificial Negro.</p>
<p>Watch how fucked up things are going to become after November.  And it will be our fault, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turbine Yukon Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1093085</link>
		<dc:creator>Turbine Yukon Palin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1093085</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There was a program back in the 60s called Skybolt, which would have mounted long-range ballistic missiles on B-52s…&lt;/blockquote&gt;Probably would&#039;ve been hard to record &quot;Rock Lobster&quot; after that, but it&#039;d&#039;ve made for an interestingly dangerous live show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There was a program back in the 60s called Skybolt, which would have mounted long-range ballistic missiles on B-52s…</p></blockquote>
<p>Probably would&#8217;ve been hard to record &#8220;Rock Lobster&#8221; after that, but it&#8217;d've made for an interestingly dangerous live show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redneck</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1093075</link>
		<dc:creator>Redneck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1093075</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You know, that might be more impressive if any of them knew how to find Diego Garcia on a map.&lt;/i&gt;

Treck quesshun!

Diego Garcias come inna box o&#039; twenny foah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You know, that might be more impressive if any of them knew how to find Diego Garcia on a map.</i></p>
<p>Treck quesshun!</p>
<p>Diego Garcias come inna box o&#8217; twenny foah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1093074</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1093074</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Many of the rednecks I’ve been inflicted upon can tell you the yield of all the cruise missiles on the average battleship based on Diego Garcia within a kiloton.&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah.

You know, that might be more impressive if any of them knew how to find Diego Garcia on a map.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Many of the rednecks I’ve been inflicted upon can tell you the yield of all the cruise missiles on the average battleship based on Diego Garcia within a kiloton.</i></p>
<p>Yeah.</p>
<p>You know, that might be more impressive if any of them knew how to find Diego Garcia on a map.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actor212</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1092943</link>
		<dc:creator>actor212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1092943</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Defense, however, I don’t know. Most of the ones I run into seem to think that defense means doing things like going to war in Iraq. &lt;/i&gt;

Many of the rednecks I&#039;ve been inflicted upon can tell you the yield of all the cruise missiles on the average battleship based on Diego Garcia within a kiloton.

It&#039;s scary, sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Defense, however, I don’t know. Most of the ones I run into seem to think that defense means doing things like going to war in Iraq. </i></p>
<p>Many of the rednecks I&#8217;ve been inflicted upon can tell you the yield of all the cruise missiles on the average battleship based on Diego Garcia within a kiloton.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s scary, sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Pez</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1092930</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Pez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1092930</guid>
		<description>My dream scenario is that Mittens wins the nomination, and the Wasilla Quitta bolts the GOP and accepts the Constitution Party nomination.  Then goes on to win Alaska and half a dozen ex-slave states.

Sweet, sweet schadenfreude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My dream scenario is that Mittens wins the nomination, and the Wasilla Quitta bolts the GOP and accepts the Constitution Party nomination.  Then goes on to win Alaska and half a dozen ex-slave states.</p>
<p>Sweet, sweet schadenfreude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1092924</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1092924</guid>
		<description>Well, if Caribou Barbie comes out, whatever happens in the end, the primary will be vile enough to render out some of the true believers on either side.

I can guarantee you Caribou Barbie is going to play serious &quot;Mean Girl&quot; against her opponents and show off her ignorance blatantly enough to turn off a big chunk of supporters of the other candidates. And a big chunk of her supporters are going to defend her to the death against the supposed slights of her opponents and the media.

So in the end, if it&#039;s Caribou Barbie, plenty of sane Republicans are going to sit it out or vote reluctantly for the Negro President.

And if it&#039;s Mittster, the Palin-ites will sit it out.

Of course, if Mittster tries to do a McCain and nominate Palin as VP, hilarity will ensue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if Caribou Barbie comes out, whatever happens in the end, the primary will be vile enough to render out some of the true believers on either side.</p>
<p>I can guarantee you Caribou Barbie is going to play serious &#8220;Mean Girl&#8221; against her opponents and show off her ignorance blatantly enough to turn off a big chunk of supporters of the other candidates. And a big chunk of her supporters are going to defend her to the death against the supposed slights of her opponents and the media.</p>
<p>So in the end, if it&#8217;s Caribou Barbie, plenty of sane Republicans are going to sit it out or vote reluctantly for the Negro President.</p>
<p>And if it&#8217;s Mittster, the Palin-ites will sit it out.</p>
<p>Of course, if Mittster tries to do a McCain and nominate Palin as VP, hilarity will ensue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1092922</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1092922</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;My two-year-old memories of that campaign tell me that McCain only got the nomination because he was everyone’s second choice. And even then, the GOP base hated him so much he had to throw his buddy Rape Gurney Joe overboard and pick Caribou Barbie as his running mate.&lt;/i&gt;

Yep.

Back in 2000, Bush beat McCain because he was able to merge the big business and religious right factions, leaving McCain with nothing but the moderates.  In 2008, there was no George Bush - the big businessers distrusted Huckabee, and the religious righters distrusted Romney.  Hence, McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My two-year-old memories of that campaign tell me that McCain only got the nomination because he was everyone’s second choice. And even then, the GOP base hated him so much he had to throw his buddy Rape Gurney Joe overboard and pick Caribou Barbie as his running mate.</i></p>
<p>Yep.</p>
<p>Back in 2000, Bush beat McCain because he was able to merge the big business and religious right factions, leaving McCain with nothing but the moderates.  In 2008, there was no George Bush &#8211; the big businessers distrusted Huckabee, and the religious righters distrusted Romney.  Hence, McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Pez</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1092919</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Pez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1092919</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;People thought McCain had no chance of being the GOP Republican candidate–but when all was said and done, the conservatives united behind him.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My two-year-old memories of that campaign tell me that McCain only got the nomination because he was everyone&#039;s second choice.  And even then, the GOP base hated him so much he had to throw his buddy Rape Gurney Joe overboard and pick Caribou Barbie as his running mate.

If Mittens gets the nomination, he&#039;ll face the same problem, only worse, and he&#039;ll deal with it the same way.  Only worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>People thought McCain had no chance of being the GOP Republican candidate–but when all was said and done, the conservatives united behind him.</p></blockquote>
<p>My two-year-old memories of that campaign tell me that McCain only got the nomination because he was everyone&#8217;s second choice.  And even then, the GOP base hated him so much he had to throw his buddy Rape Gurney Joe overboard and pick Caribou Barbie as his running mate.</p>
<p>If Mittens gets the nomination, he&#8217;ll face the same problem, only worse, and he&#8217;ll deal with it the same way.  Only worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deering</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1092914</link>
		<dc:creator>deering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1092914</guid>
		<description>People thought McCain had no chance of being the GOP Republican candidate--but when all was said and done, the conservatives united behind him.  No matter what issues the born-aginner types or whomever have with Romney, if he looks like the party&#039;s best chance to defeat Obama (and makes enough concessions to them) they&#039;ll set a land-speed record backing him. Never ever ever underestimate the average conservative&#039;s programming to support their own when the chips are down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People thought McCain had no chance of being the GOP Republican candidate&#8211;but when all was said and done, the conservatives united behind him.  No matter what issues the born-aginner types or whomever have with Romney, if he looks like the party&#8217;s best chance to defeat Obama (and makes enough concessions to them) they&#8217;ll set a land-speed record backing him. Never ever ever underestimate the average conservative&#8217;s programming to support their own when the chips are down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Bouffant</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1092913</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Bouffant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1092913</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There are democrats who EAT VEGETABLES!&lt;/i&gt;

Not this one! I barely touch fruit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There are democrats who EAT VEGETABLES!</i></p>
<p>Not this one! I barely touch fruit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. Kiernan</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1092912</link>
		<dc:creator>W. Kiernan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1092912</guid>
		<description>I hate to seem so pessimistic, but in what way does this ignorant gaffe diminish Romney&#039;s electoral appeal to the sort of people who vote Republican?  It&#039;s all right to be a moron if you&#039;re a Republican, you know.  In fact it makes your voters love you better.  It&#039;s perfectly acceptable to make statements of &quot;fact&quot; which are clearly untrue, e.g. Ronald Reagan&#039;s budget proposals in the 1980 campaign (cut taxes [for millionaires], double the defense budget, eliminate the Federal deficit &lt;I&gt;all at the same time&lt;/I&gt;) or George W. Bush&#039;s budget proposals in his 2000 campaign (the ones which drove Paul Krugman over the edge) or pretty much every assertion that came out of Sarah Palin&#039;s mouth during the 2008 campaign (e.g. &quot;death panels&quot;).

It&#039;s a lot like Oral Roberts&#039;s nine-hundred-foot-tall Jesus.  You and I hear that sort of talk and we are just disgusted.  But that&#039;s not how Roberts&#039;s followers feel about it.  They are just as aware as you and I that Roberts&#039;s claim, as factual reporting, a lie, and not just a lie but a blatantly self-serving one (900&#039; Jesus was part of a fundraising pitch).  And this gives them an opportunity to show off their religiosity, superior to sane people&#039;s religiosity, by ostentatiously affecting to believe this obvious lie.  &quot;God said it, I believe it, that settles it! (big shit-eating grin)  And it serves as kind of a shibboleth; everybody else who acts as though he too believes it is on your side, while people who can&#039;t quite bring themselves to avow complete faith in this obviously untrue story - well, now, would you want a doubter like that in &lt;I&gt;your&lt;/I&gt; Klavern?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to seem so pessimistic, but in what way does this ignorant gaffe diminish Romney&#8217;s electoral appeal to the sort of people who vote Republican?  It&#8217;s all right to be a moron if you&#8217;re a Republican, you know.  In fact it makes your voters love you better.  It&#8217;s perfectly acceptable to make statements of &#8220;fact&#8221; which are clearly untrue, e.g. Ronald Reagan&#8217;s budget proposals in the 1980 campaign (cut taxes [for millionaires], double the defense budget, eliminate the Federal deficit <i>all at the same time</i>) or George W. Bush&#8217;s budget proposals in his 2000 campaign (the ones which drove Paul Krugman over the edge) or pretty much every assertion that came out of Sarah Palin&#8217;s mouth during the 2008 campaign (e.g. &#8220;death panels&#8221;).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a lot like Oral Roberts&#8217;s nine-hundred-foot-tall Jesus.  You and I hear that sort of talk and we are just disgusted.  But that&#8217;s not how Roberts&#8217;s followers feel about it.  They are just as aware as you and I that Roberts&#8217;s claim, as factual reporting, a lie, and not just a lie but a blatantly self-serving one (900&#8242; Jesus was part of a fundraising pitch).  And this gives them an opportunity to show off their religiosity, superior to sane people&#8217;s religiosity, by ostentatiously affecting to believe this obvious lie.  &#8220;God said it, I believe it, that settles it! (big shit-eating grin)  And it serves as kind of a shibboleth; everybody else who acts as though he too believes it is on your side, while people who can&#8217;t quite bring themselves to avow complete faith in this obviously untrue story &#8211; well, now, would you want a doubter like that in <i>your</i> Klavern?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haystack Calhoun</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1092911</link>
		<dc:creator>Haystack Calhoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1092911</guid>
		<description>You want a real gaffe?

There are democrats who EAT VEGETABLES!

Focus please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want a real gaffe?</p>
<p>There are democrats who EAT VEGETABLES!</p>
<p>Focus please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1092910</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1092910</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The NYT sure has a track record for these “Poor Little Rich Kid” articles. Remember the one about the Williamsburg trust fund kids whose parents can’t afford bankrolling their hipster lifestyles anymore? Can’t be arsed looking it up…&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/08/nyregion/08trustafarians.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This one?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The NYT sure has a track record for these “Poor Little Rich Kid” articles. Remember the one about the Williamsburg trust fund kids whose parents can’t afford bankrolling their hipster lifestyles anymore? Can’t be arsed looking it up…</i></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/08/nyregion/08trustafarians.html" rel="nofollow">This one?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/32300.html#comment-1092909</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=32300#comment-1092909</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This is the man who wants to be the Commander-in-Chief, the leader of the free world, and the guy who takes the 3 a.m. phone calls in the White House and yet he thinks that you mount ICBMs on bombers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It takes a lot more than one gaffe to lay a GOP pol low, even one that pathetic. A lot of the RealAmericanz™ who&#039;d be inclined to vote for Mitt have no idea what ICBM even stands for. Team politics &amp; &quot;RULE ONE: Spite Teh Liberals&quot; means that Mitt could advocate child-rape &amp; cannibalism &amp; still only poll a few points behind any other venal twit running for the same brand-name, er, party.

Fortunately, as many here have pointed out, his Magic Gonch has far more dire political implications for Mitt than a little thing like not having a clue about military hardware. 

Republicans now being increasingly crippled by the same bigotry they&#039;ve fed into (&amp; won elections with) for so many years = IRONYGASM.

That still leaves the question: who the hell CAN the Goopers run against Obama in two years&#039; time? Chuck Norris? Zombie Reagan? They&#039;ve sure got an awesome menu to choose from - if you enjoy putrid gruel.

I&#039;m kind of hoping they get desperate enough to ask Walnuts to get back on that soul-killing hobby-horse, &amp; he tells them to eat shit &amp; die in a fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This is the man who wants to be the Commander-in-Chief, the leader of the free world, and the guy who takes the 3 a.m. phone calls in the White House and yet he thinks that you mount ICBMs on bombers.</p></blockquote>
<p>It takes a lot more than one gaffe to lay a GOP pol low, even one that pathetic. A lot of the RealAmericanz™ who&#8217;d be inclined to vote for Mitt have no idea what ICBM even stands for. Team politics &amp; &#8220;RULE ONE: Spite Teh Liberals&#8221; means that Mitt could advocate child-rape &amp; cannibalism &amp; still only poll a few points behind any other venal twit running for the same brand-name, er, party.</p>
<p>Fortunately, as many here have pointed out, his Magic Gonch has far more dire political implications for Mitt than a little thing like not having a clue about military hardware. </p>
<p>Republicans now being increasingly crippled by the same bigotry they&#8217;ve fed into (&amp; won elections with) for so many years = IRONYGASM.</p>
<p>That still leaves the question: who the hell CAN the Goopers run against Obama in two years&#8217; time? Chuck Norris? Zombie Reagan? They&#8217;ve sure got an awesome menu to choose from &#8211; if you enjoy putrid gruel.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m kind of hoping they get desperate enough to ask Walnuts to get back on that soul-killing hobby-horse, &amp; he tells them to eat shit &amp; die in a fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

