<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dense Stupid Sent, Attenuated Stupid Received</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spaghetti happens</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61513</link>
		<dc:creator>spaghetti happens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 03:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61513</guid>
		<description>If Jonah&#039;s commenter has nothing to hide, where&#039;s his sacrifice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Jonah&#8217;s commenter has nothing to hide, where&#8217;s his sacrifice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kobie</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61447</link>
		<dc:creator>Kobie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 21:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61447</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Can you imagine if American pundits were so cowardly during the cold war? When there REALLY was a threat to our lives and our way of life? &lt;/i&gt;

For a bunch that talks so tough about killing Islamofascists, it amazes me how pants-shittingly terrified of them they really are, perfectly willing to piss away 220 years of civil liberties because Abdul from the 7-11 down the street is a little too swarthy looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Can you imagine if American pundits were so cowardly during the cold war? When there REALLY was a threat to our lives and our way of life? </i></p>
<p>For a bunch that talks so tough about killing Islamofascists, it amazes me how pants-shittingly terrified of them they really are, perfectly willing to piss away 220 years of civil liberties because Abdul from the 7-11 down the street is a little too swarthy looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61363</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 17:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61363</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But the way I see it, thereâ€™s other things I can do - like give up some of my civil liberties in the name of national security.&lt;/i&gt;

Fear.  Dripping, sweating, eye-darting, quivering fear.  Here&#039;s these supposedly tough-guy &quot;conservatives&quot; litterally BEGGING the government to OH PLEASE step in and save us from those awful people who attack us--er, attacked us five years ago--no matter what it takes.  I know I&#039;ve said it before, but I just don&#039;t understand why they&#039;re not embarrassed.  Seems to me that it should take more than a few islamic nutjobs in caves halfway around the world to turn grown men with guns in the most powerful nation in the history of the world into pants-wetting crybabies.  Can you imagine if American pundits were so cowardly during the cold war?  When there REALLY was a threat to our lives and our way of life?  Why don&#039;t these guys get called on this crap?  Why doesn&#039;t someone ask &quot;Why are you so afraid?&quot;  &quot;What exactly are you so afraid OF?&quot;  Even if/when al Quaida attacks us again, and assuming they have some level of success and blow up a building and kill a few hundred people, that would be bad but it would not &quot;destroy America&quot;.  They simply do not represent this so-called &quot;Existential Threat to America (tm).  

So I&#039;m thinking we need to take these poor, fearful children in our arms and speak softly to them, show them there&#039;s no monster in the closet, give them a nightlight and a glass of water, and tuck them in.  I&#039;ll start with Marie Jon&#039;...

mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But the way I see it, thereâ€™s other things I can do &#8211; like give up some of my civil liberties in the name of national security.</i></p>
<p>Fear.  Dripping, sweating, eye-darting, quivering fear.  Here&#8217;s these supposedly tough-guy &#8220;conservatives&#8221; litterally BEGGING the government to OH PLEASE step in and save us from those awful people who attack us&#8211;er, attacked us five years ago&#8211;no matter what it takes.  I know I&#8217;ve said it before, but I just don&#8217;t understand why they&#8217;re not embarrassed.  Seems to me that it should take more than a few islamic nutjobs in caves halfway around the world to turn grown men with guns in the most powerful nation in the history of the world into pants-wetting crybabies.  Can you imagine if American pundits were so cowardly during the cold war?  When there REALLY was a threat to our lives and our way of life?  Why don&#8217;t these guys get called on this crap?  Why doesn&#8217;t someone ask &#8220;Why are you so afraid?&#8221;  &#8220;What exactly are you so afraid OF?&#8221;  Even if/when al Quaida attacks us again, and assuming they have some level of success and blow up a building and kill a few hundred people, that would be bad but it would not &#8220;destroy America&#8221;.  They simply do not represent this so-called &#8220;Existential Threat to America &#8482;.  </p>
<p>So I&#8217;m thinking we need to take these poor, fearful children in our arms and speak softly to them, show them there&#8217;s no monster in the closet, give them a nightlight and a glass of water, and tuck them in.  I&#8217;ll start with Marie Jon&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigrismus</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61356</link>
		<dc:creator>tigrismus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 16:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61356</guid>
		<description>I say we applaud this hero for desiring to sacrifice his civil liberties, then throw him in Gitmo for the duration; a sacrifice in action is more laudable than a sacrifice in intention.  Plus, he&#039;s clearly treasonously antiAmerican in his hatred of the Constitution, and we need to be very careful with these sorts of dangerous persons in a post 9/11 world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say we applaud this hero for desiring to sacrifice his civil liberties, then throw him in Gitmo for the duration; a sacrifice in action is more laudable than a sacrifice in intention.  Plus, he&#8217;s clearly treasonously antiAmerican in his hatred of the Constitution, and we need to be very careful with these sorts of dangerous persons in a post 9/11 world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jade</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61326</link>
		<dc:creator>jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 15:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61326</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But the way I see it, thereâ€™s other things I can do - like give up some of my civil liberties in the name of national security.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;ve seen plenty of comments on Glenn Greenwald&#039;s blog that are worse than that. Which is why I had to stop reading the comments there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But the way I see it, thereâ€™s other things I can do &#8211; like give up some of my civil liberties in the name of national security.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen plenty of comments on Glenn Greenwald&#8217;s blog that are worse than that. Which is why I had to stop reading the comments there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woodrowfan</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61310</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodrowfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 14:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61310</guid>
		<description>The comic &quot;Candorville&quot; nailed it today.  A RWer noting that he had too sacrificed for the war; his &quot;support the troops&quot; magnet took some of the paint off of his BMW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comic &#8220;Candorville&#8221; nailed it today.  A RWer noting that he had too sacrificed for the war; his &#8220;support the troops&#8221; magnet took some of the paint off of his BMW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LA Confidential Pantload</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61309</link>
		<dc:creator>LA Confidential Pantload</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 14:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61309</guid>
		<description>I thought the Doughmeister wrote all those anonymous e-mails himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the Doughmeister wrote all those anonymous e-mails himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jillian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61305</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 13:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61305</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So, if you want to give up your, my and everyoneâ€™s, right to privacy, all you have to do is amend the Constitution to nullify the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.&lt;/i&gt;

Heh....a friend of mine and I have developed this running joke of referring to the amendments to the Constitution as &quot;suggestions&quot;.  Thus, &quot;The First Suggestion&quot; says that Congress should really respect your right to assemble....as long as it&#039;s not too much of a bother or anything.  Likewise, the Fifth Suggestion says that no level of government should compel anyone to incriminate themselves.....if it can possibly avoid doing so.  If it can&#039;t, well.....&lt;i&gt;dulce et decorum est&lt;/i&gt; and all that.

And anyone who has a problem with any of the Constitutional Suggestions is objectively pro-terrorist, I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So, if you want to give up your, my and everyoneâ€™s, right to privacy, all you have to do is amend the Constitution to nullify the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.</i></p>
<p>Heh&#8230;.a friend of mine and I have developed this running joke of referring to the amendments to the Constitution as &#8220;suggestions&#8221;.  Thus, &#8220;The First Suggestion&#8221; says that Congress should really respect your right to assemble&#8230;.as long as it&#8217;s not too much of a bother or anything.  Likewise, the Fifth Suggestion says that no level of government should compel anyone to incriminate themselves&#8230;..if it can possibly avoid doing so.  If it can&#8217;t, well&#8230;..<i>dulce et decorum est</i> and all that.</p>
<p>And anyone who has a problem with any of the Constitutional Suggestions is objectively pro-terrorist, I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdsAppliance</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61304</link>
		<dc:creator>EdsAppliance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 13:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61304</guid>
		<description>Not just enforce strong gun control laws, but *Ignore* the gun control laws on the books. The ones the NRA so dearly loves. If the government can ignore the fourth amendment, it can ignore the second.

So, if you want to give up your, my and everyone&#039;s, right to privacy, all you have to do is amend the Constitution to nullify the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.

There&#039;s an amendment they should be debating. Flag burning indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just enforce strong gun control laws, but *Ignore* the gun control laws on the books. The ones the NRA so dearly loves. If the government can ignore the fourth amendment, it can ignore the second.</p>
<p>So, if you want to give up your, my and everyone&#8217;s, right to privacy, all you have to do is amend the Constitution to nullify the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an amendment they should be debating. Flag burning indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WYsage</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61301</link>
		<dc:creator>WYsage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 13:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61301</guid>
		<description>If these conservatives want to give up constitutional protections for their safety, then we should invite them to advocate and enforce strong gun control laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If these conservatives want to give up constitutional protections for their safety, then we should invite them to advocate and enforce strong gun control laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ned fucking flanders</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61300</link>
		<dc:creator>ned fucking flanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 13:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61300</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I blame â€œSaved by the Bell.â€? I think a whole generation of American minds was ruined by that show.&lt;/i&gt;

I have founnd &quot;Saved by the Bell&quot; to be a convenient scapegoat for a whole host of atrocities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I blame â€œSaved by the Bell.â€? I think a whole generation of American minds was ruined by that show.</i></p>
<p>I have founnd &#8220;Saved by the Bell&#8221; to be a convenient scapegoat for a whole host of atrocities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mal de mer</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61297</link>
		<dc:creator>Mal de mer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 12:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61297</guid>
		<description>Paste-eaters live in a variety of habitats.  Trailer-trash might not be the cosmopolitan sophisticates that effete and elitist liberals might want them to be all the time, but not all of them are deluded either. 

There is a curious phenomenon among paste-eaters.  When given the chance to express their understanding of reality, they believe  they&#039;re are being &lt;i&gt;ordered&lt;/i&gt; to spout an opinion...&lt;i&gt;any opinion&lt;/i&gt;...or be judged &quot;stupid&quot; if they are honest by responding with &quot;I don&#039;t know&quot; or &quot;I don&#039;t care.&quot;  Hence, the recourse to platitudes and talking-points about real issues, that, when subject to a closer investigation, would reveal they neither understand nor really believe.

It&#039;s the result of a cultural dynamic that insists that the biggest sin is to honestly admit you don&#039;t know something; a culture in which not knowing something opens you up to scorn and ridicule.


It&#039;s adolescent and dishonest, and with anyone passed 25 years old, unforgivable.

I blame &quot;Saved by the Bell.&quot;  I think a whole generation of American minds was ruined by that show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paste-eaters live in a variety of habitats.  Trailer-trash might not be the cosmopolitan sophisticates that effete and elitist liberals might want them to be all the time, but not all of them are deluded either. </p>
<p>There is a curious phenomenon among paste-eaters.  When given the chance to express their understanding of reality, they believe  they&#8217;re are being <i>ordered</i> to spout an opinion&#8230;<i>any opinion</i>&#8230;or be judged &#8220;stupid&#8221; if they are honest by responding with &#8220;I don&#8217;t know&#8221; or &#8220;I don&#8217;t care.&#8221;  Hence, the recourse to platitudes and talking-points about real issues, that, when subject to a closer investigation, would reveal they neither understand nor really believe.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the result of a cultural dynamic that insists that the biggest sin is to honestly admit you don&#8217;t know something; a culture in which not knowing something opens you up to scorn and ridicule.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s adolescent and dishonest, and with anyone passed 25 years old, unforgivable.</p>
<p>I blame &#8220;Saved by the Bell.&#8221;  I think a whole generation of American minds was ruined by that show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad R.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61295</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 11:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61295</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Yeah, Iâ€™m sure your taxes are gonna get so high the bank will foreclose on the double-wide. Pantload and his 5 â€œfansâ€? need to sit in the back of the class and eat some fucking paste.&lt;/em&gt;

I dissent.  Even trailer hicks know better than to read Jonah.  This guy is clearly a pasty white suburban porker who fantasizes about having his brains transplanted into a robot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Yeah, Iâ€™m sure your taxes are gonna get so high the bank will foreclose on the double-wide. Pantload and his 5 â€œfansâ€? need to sit in the back of the class and eat some fucking paste.</em></p>
<p>I dissent.  Even trailer hicks know better than to read Jonah.  This guy is clearly a pasty white suburban porker who fantasizes about having his brains transplanted into a robot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad R.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61294</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 11:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61294</guid>
		<description>The guy would rather live in a police state that pay higher taxes.  Wow.  &quot;Give me liberty or give me a flat screen TV... in fact, just give me the TV, I don&#039;t give a shit...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy would rather live in a police state that pay higher taxes.  Wow.  &#8220;Give me liberty or give me a flat screen TV&#8230; in fact, just give me the TV, I don&#8217;t give a shit&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewie Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61283</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewie Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 09:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61283</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;they are almost exclusivley talking about increased taxes as the â€™sacrificeâ€™ we can make&lt;/i&gt;

Apparently Mr.Emailer hasn&#039;t heard of Operation Yellow Elephant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>they are almost exclusivley talking about increased taxes as the â€™sacrificeâ€™ we can make</i></p>
<p>Apparently Mr.Emailer hasn&#8217;t heard of Operation Yellow Elephant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jr</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61272</link>
		<dc:creator>jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 05:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61272</guid>
		<description>The stay puff marshmallow man will say anthing to get the trailerites to accept Stasi style surveillance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stay puff marshmallow man will say anthing to get the trailerites to accept Stasi style surveillance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gc wall</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61270</link>
		<dc:creator>gc wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 05:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61270</guid>
		<description>That response was a fuctoid that gives the impression that it was paid for. I sincerely doubt that a real human could cover so many RNC yacking points in such a concise manner. Even the brainwarped can no longer believe the fantasy peddled by the pushers of death and tyranny. I can dream, can&#039;t I?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That response was a fuctoid that gives the impression that it was paid for. I sincerely doubt that a real human could cover so many RNC yacking points in such a concise manner. Even the brainwarped can no longer believe the fantasy peddled by the pushers of death and tyranny. I can dream, can&#8217;t I?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ned fucking flanders</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61269</link>
		<dc:creator>ned fucking flanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 04:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61269</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If I didnâ€™t know better about the economic implications of high taxes I would gladly go along.&lt;/i&gt;

This is the line that gives it away as parody.

No real conservative - or, more accurately, no National Review reader who thinks he&#039;s a real conservative - would ever say that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If I didnâ€™t know better about the economic implications of high taxes I would gladly go along.</i></p>
<p>This is the line that gives it away as parody.</p>
<p>No real conservative &#8211; or, more accurately, no National Review reader who thinks he&#8217;s a real conservative &#8211; would ever say that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61268</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 04:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61268</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; thereâ€™s other things I can do - like give up some of my civil liberties in the name of national security&lt;/i&gt;

How touching. There ought to be some kind of formal ceremony for offering up one&#039;s privacy to the Borg, in which one becomes Transparent before God and Dubya by undergoing a public strip search and reciting a list of past porn rentals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> thereâ€™s other things I can do &#8211; like give up some of my civil liberties in the name of national security</i></p>
<p>How touching. There ought to be some kind of formal ceremony for offering up one&#8217;s privacy to the Borg, in which one becomes Transparent before God and Dubya by undergoing a public strip search and reciting a list of past porn rentals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marky</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/3130.html#comment-61265</link>
		<dc:creator>marky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 04:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/003130.html#comment-61265</guid>
		<description>Yes, no question it was parody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, no question it was parody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

