<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two-Minute Townhall (a day late but not necessarily any shorter)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mo</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54391</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 22:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54391</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;How did they get Sullum to write for Townhall anyways?&lt;/I&gt;

It&#039;s called syndication. Jacob writes the articles, Townhall and other outlets choose to purchase them, or not. 

&lt;I&gt;Are these the same libertarians who, in hit and run, posted a photo essay in which they conveyed the profound libertarian truth that cops beating hippie protesters must be a laff-riot?&lt;/I&gt;

This posted on a blog that has: &quot;Rope. Tree. Conservative. Some Assembly Required&quot; as a suggested t-shirt. How accepting of different views you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How did they get Sullum to write for Townhall anyways?</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s called syndication. Jacob writes the articles, Townhall and other outlets choose to purchase them, or not. </p>
<p><i>Are these the same libertarians who, in hit and run, posted a photo essay in which they conveyed the profound libertarian truth that cops beating hippie protesters must be a laff-riot?</i></p>
<p>This posted on a blog that has: &#8220;Rope. Tree. Conservative. Some Assembly Required&#8221; as a suggested t-shirt. How accepting of different views you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retardo</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54180</link>
		<dc:creator>Retardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 09:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54180</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Sullumâ€™s a libertarian and libertarians are generally disgusted with this administration and its war overseas and at home on the privacy of U.S. citizens.&lt;/i&gt;

I saw the post at Hit &amp; Run.

I&#039;m curious:  Are these the same libertarians who, in hit and run, endorsed Samuel &quot;All Your Uterus Are Belong To Us&quot; Alito because they thought he&#039;d be teh shit on eminent domain specifically and property rights in general? Are these the same libertarians who, in hit and run, posted a photo essay in which they conveyed the profound libertarian truth that cops beating hippie protesters must be a laff-riot? Are these the same libertarians whose former editor of Reason, Matt Welch, was one of the biggest Instapundity anti-idiotarians -- meaning, that he he spent more time and energy bashing the powerful and pernicious lefties Noam Chomsky and Gore Vidal and Susan Sontag than he could manage for the poor poor good-faith-acting, constitution-guarding Bush Administration?

Yeah, tell me about how we should be so fair to such principled libertarians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Sullumâ€™s a libertarian and libertarians are generally disgusted with this administration and its war overseas and at home on the privacy of U.S. citizens.</i></p>
<p>I saw the post at Hit &amp; Run.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious:  Are these the same libertarians who, in hit and run, endorsed Samuel &#8220;All Your Uterus Are Belong To Us&#8221; Alito because they thought he&#8217;d be teh shit on eminent domain specifically and property rights in general? Are these the same libertarians who, in hit and run, posted a photo essay in which they conveyed the profound libertarian truth that cops beating hippie protesters must be a laff-riot? Are these the same libertarians whose former editor of Reason, Matt Welch, was one of the biggest Instapundity anti-idiotarians &#8212; meaning, that he he spent more time and energy bashing the powerful and pernicious lefties Noam Chomsky and Gore Vidal and Susan Sontag than he could manage for the poor poor good-faith-acting, constitution-guarding Bush Administration?</p>
<p>Yeah, tell me about how we should be so fair to such principled libertarians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merlallen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54176</link>
		<dc:creator>merlallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54176</guid>
		<description>you and me both,  mal de mer. so many nerds in one place is kind of off putting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you and me both,  mal de mer. so many nerds in one place is kind of off putting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marq</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54175</link>
		<dc:creator>Marq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54175</guid>
		<description>Speaking of X3. that was my project for the night--to take that steaming pile in so that you, the innocent SadNo audience don&#039;t have to. Actually, it was less a steaming pile than an inert one. As far as comic-based movies so far this year go, V For Vendetta was head-and0shoulders above X-Men in every way, from performances to costumes to production values. X3 was edited very randomly, with cuts from one scene to another occurring in the &lt;i&gt;oddest &lt;/i&gt;places. Leaving aside any deficiencies of plot, what&#039;s good and what isn&#039;t--
Good: Magneto. Mystique (what little screentime they give her). The scene between Iceman and Pyro in front of the &lt;strike&gt;abortion clinic&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;i&gt;mutation cure &lt;/i&gt;clinic. Surprisingly, Juggernaut (though I &lt;i&gt;still &lt;/i&gt;hate the way he looks). The opening scene with &quot;de-aged&quot; Professor X and Magneto visiting teenaged Jean Grey. The counterpart scene later with Phoenix. Goodly portions of the Golden Gate/Assault on Alcatraz sequence (but not &lt;i&gt;all &lt;/i&gt;of it!). Kelsey Grammer&#039;s &lt;i&gt;performance &lt;/i&gt;as Beast (the makeup and wire-work, OTOH... meh). Breaking Mystique out of custody. Multiple Man (well, his &lt;i&gt;2 &lt;/i&gt;scenes, anyway).
The Bad: Star Trek: TNG&#039;s Holodeck&#039;s cameo as the freaking Danger Room. Sorry, Fox, I&#039;m sure that &quot;It&#039;s all &lt;i&gt;holographic!&quot; &lt;/i&gt;seemed cool to &lt;i&gt;you, &lt;/i&gt;but frankly, it&#039;s ass. Danger Room = Big Honkin&#039; Machines and Robots. &lt;i&gt;Real &lt;/i&gt;robots, not some half-assed Simu-entinal. Feh on that! Ambiguous, off-screen deaths *ahem*. Jean Grey--&lt;i&gt;why, &lt;/i&gt;exactly, did you bring Jean back if you weren&#039;t gonna really use her? And, call her what you will, but that was no Phoenix that I saw. Ugh. And tween romantic triangles--yecch! I really have no idea what Bobby Drake was supposed to be up to r/e Rogue and Kitty Pride. Admittedly, teens are emotionally unstable horndogs, but it was pretty incoherent. And, though I&#039;ve mentioned Jean, her &quot;climactic&quot; scene was... &lt;i&gt;lame. &lt;/i&gt;No Nightcrawler. Magneto&#039;s fate (just weak). Xavier&#039;s fate (and I &lt;i&gt;am &lt;/i&gt;talking about the post-credits sequence here). A lot of the effect and wire work were dicy at best (&lt;i&gt;way &lt;/i&gt;too much cheap-looking CG smoke/fog. bleah). The plot, on the whole, was painfully inartful. And Angel (who is never referred to as &quot;Angel,&quot; as far as I can tell)... why, exactly was he in this movie? To swoop in and save his dad after making what was doubtlessly a hypersonic transcontinental flight. Useful! He barely interacts with our existing characters. There&#039;s more, but you get the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of X3. that was my project for the night&#8211;to take that steaming pile in so that you, the innocent SadNo audience don&#8217;t have to. Actually, it was less a steaming pile than an inert one. As far as comic-based movies so far this year go, V For Vendetta was head-and0shoulders above X-Men in every way, from performances to costumes to production values. X3 was edited very randomly, with cuts from one scene to another occurring in the <i>oddest </i>places. Leaving aside any deficiencies of plot, what&#8217;s good and what isn&#8217;t&#8211;<br />
Good: Magneto. Mystique (what little screentime they give her). The scene between Iceman and Pyro in front of the <strike>abortion clinic</strike> <i>mutation cure </i>clinic. Surprisingly, Juggernaut (though I <i>still </i>hate the way he looks). The opening scene with &#8220;de-aged&#8221; Professor X and Magneto visiting teenaged Jean Grey. The counterpart scene later with Phoenix. Goodly portions of the Golden Gate/Assault on Alcatraz sequence (but not <i>all </i>of it!). Kelsey Grammer&#8217;s <i>performance </i>as Beast (the makeup and wire-work, OTOH&#8230; meh). Breaking Mystique out of custody. Multiple Man (well, his <i>2 </i>scenes, anyway).<br />
The Bad: Star Trek: TNG&#8217;s Holodeck&#8217;s cameo as the freaking Danger Room. Sorry, Fox, I&#8217;m sure that &#8220;It&#8217;s all <i>holographic!&#8221; </i>seemed cool to <i>you, </i>but frankly, it&#8217;s ass. Danger Room = Big Honkin&#8217; Machines and Robots. <i>Real </i>robots, not some half-assed Simu-entinal. Feh on that! Ambiguous, off-screen deaths *ahem*. Jean Grey&#8211;<i>why, </i>exactly, did you bring Jean back if you weren&#8217;t gonna really use her? And, call her what you will, but that was no Phoenix that I saw. Ugh. And tween romantic triangles&#8211;yecch! I really have no idea what Bobby Drake was supposed to be up to r/e Rogue and Kitty Pride. Admittedly, teens are emotionally unstable horndogs, but it was pretty incoherent. And, though I&#8217;ve mentioned Jean, her &#8220;climactic&#8221; scene was&#8230; <i>lame. </i>No Nightcrawler. Magneto&#8217;s fate (just weak). Xavier&#8217;s fate (and I <i>am </i>talking about the post-credits sequence here). A lot of the effect and wire work were dicy at best (<i>way </i>too much cheap-looking CG smoke/fog. bleah). The plot, on the whole, was painfully inartful. And Angel (who is never referred to as &#8220;Angel,&#8221; as far as I can tell)&#8230; why, exactly was he in this movie? To swoop in and save his dad after making what was doubtlessly a hypersonic transcontinental flight. Useful! He barely interacts with our existing characters. There&#8217;s more, but you get the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ljm</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54170</link>
		<dc:creator>ljm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54170</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Libertarians get a pass when they can demonstrate that they voted against Bush at least once.&lt;/i&gt;

I believe most did vote against him at least once.  The vast majority of whom did so the second time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Libertarians get a pass when they can demonstrate that they voted against Bush at least once.</i></p>
<p>I believe most did vote against him at least once.  The vast majority of whom did so the second time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Sidhe</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54155</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Sidhe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 02:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54155</guid>
		<description>Libertarians get a pass when they can demonstrate that they voted against Bush at least once. Otherwise, however much opposed to the war and the restrictions of civil rights they may be, they still think lower taxes trump all that.
Your other principles don&#039;t count for much if you&#039;re willing to sell them for tax cuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Libertarians get a pass when they can demonstrate that they voted against Bush at least once. Otherwise, however much opposed to the war and the restrictions of civil rights they may be, they still think lower taxes trump all that.<br />
Your other principles don&#8217;t count for much if you&#8217;re willing to sell them for tax cuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birdseatbugs</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54149</link>
		<dc:creator>birdseatbugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54149</guid>
		<description>Hee, Dan Someone beat me to the whole &quot;No penguins in Alaska!&quot; shouting. So, instead, I&#039;ll rag on the fact that the guy used &#039;your&#039; when he should have used &#039;you&#039;re&#039;. 

Moving on...

&lt;i&gt;Indian tribes must also prove that their membership is based on historical tribes that have functioned as a political entity in the past â€” none of which will be required for Native Hawaiians.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh my &lt;i&gt;God&lt;/i&gt;, this woman is a raving lunatic! After reading the article, it&#039;s obvious that the legislation in question is merely granting Hawaiian Natives the same status as Alaskan Natives -- surely something she&#039;d hyperventilate over &lt;a href=&quot;http://juneaualaska.com/history/history_peratrovich.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;were it to happen today&lt;/a&gt;. What a fuckwit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hee, Dan Someone beat me to the whole &#8220;No penguins in Alaska!&#8221; shouting. So, instead, I&#8217;ll rag on the fact that the guy used &#8216;your&#8217; when he should have used &#8216;you&#8217;re&#8217;. </p>
<p>Moving on&#8230;</p>
<p><i>Indian tribes must also prove that their membership is based on historical tribes that have functioned as a political entity in the past â€” none of which will be required for Native Hawaiians.</i></p>
<p>Oh my <i>God</i>, this woman is a raving lunatic! After reading the article, it&#8217;s obvious that the legislation in question is merely granting Hawaiian Natives the same status as Alaskan Natives &#8212; surely something she&#8217;d hyperventilate over <a href="http://juneaualaska.com/history/history_peratrovich.shtml" rel="nofollow">were it to happen today</a>. What a fuckwit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spamlimpyâ„¢</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54148</link>
		<dc:creator>Spamlimpyâ„¢</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54148</guid>
		<description>&quot;Come to think of it, didnâ€™t we white folk basically just steal the entire state of Hawaii from underneath the nativesâ€™ feet at gunpoint? I donâ€™t even think any of the Western countries had declared jurisdiction over the property yet.&quot;

Yeah, Clinton apologized on behalf of the United States to Hawaii back in 1996 on the anniversary of annexation.  We still get to keep it, though, so that&#039;s cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Come to think of it, didnâ€™t we white folk basically just steal the entire state of Hawaii from underneath the nativesâ€™ feet at gunpoint? I donâ€™t even think any of the Western countries had declared jurisdiction over the property yet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, Clinton apologized on behalf of the United States to Hawaii back in 1996 on the anniversary of annexation.  We still get to keep it, though, so that&#8217;s cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marq</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54147</link>
		<dc:creator>Marq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54147</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Also, Magneto is Nancy Pelosi.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Man, I wish Nancy Pelosi was &lt;i&gt;Magneto!&lt;/i&gt;
&quot;Well, Mr. Boehner, you make a good point about CAFE standards, but...&quot;
[a Hummer H2 flies through the House chamber, and flattens the Majority Leader--all the more impressively, it uses no gasoline in doing so]
The House proceeds to vote to raise gas milage standards....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>Also, Magneto is Nancy Pelosi.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Man, I wish Nancy Pelosi was <i>Magneto!</i><br />
&#8220;Well, Mr. Boehner, you make a good point about CAFE standards, but&#8230;&#8221;<br />
[a Hummer H2 flies through the House chamber, and flattens the Majority Leader--all the more impressively, it uses no gasoline in doing so]<br />
The House proceeds to vote to raise gas milage standards&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54136</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54136</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; I watched the first two X-Men films several times apiece and never realized that the â€œx-geneâ€? was analogous to the â€œgay gene.â€? To see that sort of subtext - hold on, thatâ€™s actually idiotic as well. Never mind.&lt;/i&gt;

Um.  Yeah, see, that whole scene with Iceman and his family in X-Men 2 was pretty much a coming-out scene.  It wasn&#039;t even remotely subtle, and director Bryan Singer -- himself gay -- while not beating audiences over the head with the mutant=gay theme per se, surely expected audiences to get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> I watched the first two X-Men films several times apiece and never realized that the â€œx-geneâ€? was analogous to the â€œgay gene.â€? To see that sort of subtext &#8211; hold on, thatâ€™s actually idiotic as well. Never mind.</i></p>
<p>Um.  Yeah, see, that whole scene with Iceman and his family in X-Men 2 was pretty much a coming-out scene.  It wasn&#8217;t even remotely subtle, and director Bryan Singer &#8212; himself gay &#8212; while not beating audiences over the head with the mutant=gay theme per se, surely expected audiences to get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patkin</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54135</link>
		<dc:creator>Patkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54135</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And donâ€™t even get me started on that douchebag whinning about how white people canâ€™t steal indian religious sites and fuck them up. How do you think he would like it if the government took his church by eminent domain and bulldozed the building?&lt;/i&gt;
Shit, the Black Hills in one of those Dakotas is right on an Indian burial site, and a bunch of white motherfuckers stuck some white fucking heads on the mountain faces just to stare down on the graves of the deceased Indians.

Come to think of it, didn&#039;t we white folk basically just steal the entire state of Hawaii from underneath the natives&#039; feet at gunpoint? I don&#039;t even think any of the Western countries had declared jurisdiction over the property yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And donâ€™t even get me started on that douchebag whinning about how white people canâ€™t steal indian religious sites and fuck them up. How do you think he would like it if the government took his church by eminent domain and bulldozed the building?</i><br />
Shit, the Black Hills in one of those Dakotas is right on an Indian burial site, and a bunch of white motherfuckers stuck some white fucking heads on the mountain faces just to stare down on the graves of the deceased Indians.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, didn&#8217;t we white folk basically just steal the entire state of Hawaii from underneath the natives&#8217; feet at gunpoint? I don&#8217;t even think any of the Western countries had declared jurisdiction over the property yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54132</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54132</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;The legislation is a marked departure from the government&#039;s treatment of legitimate Indian tribes, which must produce evidence to show that they have been in continuous existence since 1900 and have kinship and marriage, as well as cultural or religious, patterns that are distinctive. Indian tribes must also prove that their membership is based on historical tribes that have functioned as a political entity in the past -- none of which will be required for Native Hawaiians.&lt;/I&gt;

Dude... what the fuck? Hawaians have that shit in spades. If anything, they&#039;re one of the &lt;I&gt;most&lt;/I&gt; qualified peoples to be included in that act.

I would assume that it&#039;s not required because it&#039;s fucking obvious to anybody who has ever even heard of Hawai&#039;i that the people there meet that standard.

And I love how we white people are perfectly within our rights to form a sovereign state, and kick out odd-coloured foreigners, but if the Hawaians do the exact same thing it&#039;s a travesty.

And don&#039;t even get me started on that douchebag whinning about how white people can&#039;t steal indian religious sites and fuck them up. How do you think he would like it if the government took his church by eminent domain and bulldozed the building?

God-damned racists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The legislation is a marked departure from the government&#8217;s treatment of legitimate Indian tribes, which must produce evidence to show that they have been in continuous existence since 1900 and have kinship and marriage, as well as cultural or religious, patterns that are distinctive. Indian tribes must also prove that their membership is based on historical tribes that have functioned as a political entity in the past &#8212; none of which will be required for Native Hawaiians.</i></p>
<p>Dude&#8230; what the fuck? Hawaians have that shit in spades. If anything, they&#8217;re one of the <i>most</i> qualified peoples to be included in that act.</p>
<p>I would assume that it&#8217;s not required because it&#8217;s fucking obvious to anybody who has ever even heard of Hawai&#8217;i that the people there meet that standard.</p>
<p>And I love how we white people are perfectly within our rights to form a sovereign state, and kick out odd-coloured foreigners, but if the Hawaians do the exact same thing it&#8217;s a travesty.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t even get me started on that douchebag whinning about how white people can&#8217;t steal indian religious sites and fuck them up. How do you think he would like it if the government took his church by eminent domain and bulldozed the building?</p>
<p>God-damned racists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto Man</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54119</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54119</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Iâ€™ve got a half-assed plan to write something about the comments.&lt;/i&gt;

If you do, Travis, here&#039;s an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.danacountryman.com/CoverArt%20Photos/HalfAssed.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;album&lt;/a&gt; to inspire you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Iâ€™ve got a half-assed plan to write something about the comments.</i></p>
<p>If you do, Travis, here&#8217;s an <a href="http://www.danacountryman.com/CoverArt%20Photos/HalfAssed.gif" rel="nofollow">album</a> to inspire you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khonsu</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54079</link>
		<dc:creator>Khonsu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 19:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54079</guid>
		<description>You guys deserve all that crazy sex that those wingnuts don&#039;t want you to have.  Right in their mailroom.  With that one cute redheaded girl with whom little Shapiro (which is funny I say that, since he&#039;s older than I am) can&#039;t seem to first base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys deserve all that crazy sex that those wingnuts don&#8217;t want you to have.  Right in their mailroom.  With that one cute redheaded girl with whom little Shapiro (which is funny I say that, since he&#8217;s older than I am) can&#8217;t seem to first base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin M.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54068</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 19:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54068</guid>
		<description>Yo, someone needs to close italics here...

[bonks head on desk]
&lt;/i&gt;

There.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo, someone needs to close italics here&#8230;</p>
<p>[bonks head on desk]</p>
<p>There.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54065</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54065</guid>
		<description>How did they get Sullum to write for Townhall anyways?  
Was it the free Valium day?
Or do they just steal from Reason?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did they get Sullum to write for Townhall anyways?<br />
Was it the free Valium day?<br />
Or do they just steal from Reason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Someone</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54064</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54064</guid>
		<description>&lt;/i&gt;Alternate shorter Goldberg: Words -- like &quot;extreme&quot; -- can&#039;t possibly have different meanings dependent on context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alternate shorter Goldberg: Words &#8212; like &#8220;extreme&#8221; &#8212; can&#8217;t possibly have different meanings dependent on context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Penbrook</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54062</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Penbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54062</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Sullumâ€™s a libertarian and libertarians are generally disgusted with this administration and its war overseas and at home on the privacy of U.S. citizens.

Yeah! I mean sure, the quickest way to dodge being held accountable for being a war-mongering fraidycat who wants free access to guns and no access to contraception/pornography/whatever violently offends the precious sensibilities without being a Republican is to call yourself a libertarian, but libertarians are generally disgusted with this administration and its war overseas and at home on the privacy of U.S. citizens.&lt;/I&gt;

Good point, except that libertarians are pacifists who are generally in favor of abundant contraception, pornography and offensiveness. But we&#039;ll take the free access to guns!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Sullumâ€™s a libertarian and libertarians are generally disgusted with this administration and its war overseas and at home on the privacy of U.S. citizens.</p>
<p>Yeah! I mean sure, the quickest way to dodge being held accountable for being a war-mongering fraidycat who wants free access to guns and no access to contraception/pornography/whatever violently offends the precious sensibilities without being a Republican is to call yourself a libertarian, but libertarians are generally disgusted with this administration and its war overseas and at home on the privacy of U.S. citizens.</i></p>
<p>Good point, except that libertarians are pacifists who are generally in favor of abundant contraception, pornography and offensiveness. But we&#8217;ll take the free access to guns!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigrismus</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54057</link>
		<dc:creator>tigrismus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54057</guid>
		<description>I hereby declare tag season open.

Hmm, Googling his writings, Sullum actually &lt;i&gt;doesn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; appear to be as bad as the typical TownHall denizen.  Maybe we should understand it as &quot;As much as it pains TownHall for me to say it...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hereby declare tag season open.</p>
<p>Hmm, Googling his writings, Sullum actually <i>doesn&#8217;t</i> appear to be as bad as the typical TownHall denizen.  Maybe we should understand it as &#8220;As much as it pains TownHall for me to say it&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2870.html/comment-page-1#comment-54056</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002870.html#comment-54056</guid>
		<description>Casalina,

I respectfully disagree with...okay, I&#039;ll get to the point. I think maybe you&#039;re right, and I was just inferring what I know of Prof. X from the comic book, fanboy that I am. Prof is always presented as the hero of the book (which admittedly I haven&#039;t read in a while, so cut me some slack and fill me in if I leave out any pertinent details), struggling to do what&#039;s right in a morally ambiguous (I keep using that word) world. I think the point was that Xavier &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; right about her not being able to control her power, not because of her gender, but because it was too much for anyone to control. (Perhaps there&#039;s even a feminist message there, since the most powerful mutant is female.) Also, Wolverine killing her was a combination of another story in the comic book about him having to kill his lover Mariko because she&#039;d been poisoned. And yes, Wolvie is teh 4w3s0m3, and I&#039;m totally looking forward to the upcoming movie.

I do agree though that the wail into the uncaring sky (can I steal that? that&#039;s good) is overdone. And as far as killing off characters, they do it in comic books and moview about comic books all the time, regardless of gender. And it&#039;s usually some sort of noble self-sacrifice. And some bitter friend/family is left behind brooding, with Significant Consequences on the horizon.

And M de M, we&#039;ll geek out if we want to! So there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casalina,</p>
<p>I respectfully disagree with&#8230;okay, I&#8217;ll get to the point. I think maybe you&#8217;re right, and I was just inferring what I know of Prof. X from the comic book, fanboy that I am. Prof is always presented as the hero of the book (which admittedly I haven&#8217;t read in a while, so cut me some slack and fill me in if I leave out any pertinent details), struggling to do what&#8217;s right in a morally ambiguous (I keep using that word) world. I think the point was that Xavier <i>was</i> right about her not being able to control her power, not because of her gender, but because it was too much for anyone to control. (Perhaps there&#8217;s even a feminist message there, since the most powerful mutant is female.) Also, Wolverine killing her was a combination of another story in the comic book about him having to kill his lover Mariko because she&#8217;d been poisoned. And yes, Wolvie is teh 4w3s0m3, and I&#8217;m totally looking forward to the upcoming movie.</p>
<p>I do agree though that the wail into the uncaring sky (can I steal that? that&#8217;s good) is overdone. And as far as killing off characters, they do it in comic books and moview about comic books all the time, regardless of gender. And it&#8217;s usually some sort of noble self-sacrifice. And some bitter friend/family is left behind brooding, with Significant Consequences on the horizon.</p>
<p>And M de M, we&#8217;ll geek out if we want to! So there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
