<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patrick Bell: &#8220;Bwa-ha-haa! Puny mortals, I will expose you all&#8230;&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John618</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-857482</link>
		<dc:creator>John618</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-857482</guid>
		<description>Very nice site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EFFin&#8217; Unsound &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lacking the Humor Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-129372</link>
		<dc:creator>EFFin&#8217; Unsound &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lacking the Humor Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-129372</guid>
		<description>[...] have believed it.Â  He&#8217;s one of the only Seattle bloggers whose douchbaggery has captured the attention of the big dogs, while also doing his best not to embarrass the candidates he works for too [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have believed it.Â  He&#8217;s one of the only Seattle bloggers whose douchbaggery has captured the attention of the big dogs, while also doing his best not to embarrass the candidates he works for too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoatBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-53251</link>
		<dc:creator>GoatBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 14:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-53251</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Rumors and innundoes that have no basis in fact are generated by those who are intent on harming you and on damaging your reputation.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Says the self-identified troll.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Moreover, some of you actually prefer to argue with my politics as adults and refuse to resort to cheap shots just because you donâ€™t agree with me&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Disagreeing with your political religion and thinking your &quot;music&quot; sucks runny shit are not mutually exclusive, as hard as that may be to penetrate your ego defenses.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;But there are a couple of you out there, you know who you are, who donâ€™t have any self-discipline and are very reckless and irresponsible with your comments.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Says the self-identified troll.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;A person can only be pushed so far, and then they will do whatever is necessary and within their legal right to defend themselves against unfair personal attacks.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Is there a consensus on how many times a threat must go unfulfilled before it is empirically declared empty?  I don&#039;t do this anonymously.  If you&#039;re so sure of your case I can&#039;t begin to imagine the reason for your hesitation.  Again, such a slam dunk case should be able to find a lawyer on contingency before lunch today.  Until then you&#039;re still sitting on an empty pot.  Most of us would either fill it or hop down off the uncomfortable thing.  But then most of us wouldn&#039;t spend so much time at a place where everybody thinks one is a clueless tit, so there ya go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Rumors and innundoes that have no basis in fact are generated by those who are intent on harming you and on damaging your reputation.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Says the self-identified troll.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Moreover, some of you actually prefer to argue with my politics as adults and refuse to resort to cheap shots just because you donâ€™t agree with me&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Disagreeing with your political religion and thinking your &#8220;music&#8221; sucks runny shit are not mutually exclusive, as hard as that may be to penetrate your ego defenses.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;But there are a couple of you out there, you know who you are, who donâ€™t have any self-discipline and are very reckless and irresponsible with your comments.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Says the self-identified troll.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;A person can only be pushed so far, and then they will do whatever is necessary and within their legal right to defend themselves against unfair personal attacks.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Is there a consensus on how many times a threat must go unfulfilled before it is empirically declared empty?  I don&#8217;t do this anonymously.  If you&#8217;re so sure of your case I can&#8217;t begin to imagine the reason for your hesitation.  Again, such a slam dunk case should be able to find a lawyer on contingency before lunch today.  Until then you&#8217;re still sitting on an empty pot.  Most of us would either fill it or hop down off the uncomfortable thing.  But then most of us wouldn&#8217;t spend so much time at a place where everybody thinks one is a clueless tit, so there ya go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NY Law Firm</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-53243</link>
		<dc:creator>NY Law Firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 14:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-53243</guid>
		<description>To Whom It May Concern:

The NY Law Firm does not whistle. Whereas in the comment above posted by party forementioned referring to itself as New York Law Firm, our firm neither does spell out the name of our state of primary business. Associated firms with whom our firm cooperates neither refer to us by the full nomenclature of said state. Whomsoever shall hereafter post with a name that refers to themselve as any form of NY Law Firm while not being a member of our firm is in violation and will be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. You have been notified.

To Mr. BLT:

After looking in to the abuse directed at you by one poster (hereafter referred to as &quot;that poster&quot;) our partners have come to a cnclusion that the abuse given does not violate terms of the Blogging Libelous Slurs Based Upon Suppositioning and Making Stuff Up Act of 1998 (HR 6969 and S6969), but that you may in fact be in Violation of the Great Act of 2002 of Blogging Legal Untruths and Psychological Diagnoses Via Remote Domain With No Foreknown Knowledge of Pseudonymous Subject (NYHR8.003.004, .007). Please cease and desist.

You have been notified!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Whom It May Concern:</p>
<p>The NY Law Firm does not whistle. Whereas in the comment above posted by party forementioned referring to itself as New York Law Firm, our firm neither does spell out the name of our state of primary business. Associated firms with whom our firm cooperates neither refer to us by the full nomenclature of said state. Whomsoever shall hereafter post with a name that refers to themselve as any form of NY Law Firm while not being a member of our firm is in violation and will be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. You have been notified.</p>
<p>To Mr. BLT:</p>
<p>After looking in to the abuse directed at you by one poster (hereafter referred to as &#8220;that poster&#8221;) our partners have come to a cnclusion that the abuse given does not violate terms of the Blogging Libelous Slurs Based Upon Suppositioning and Making Stuff Up Act of 1998 (HR 6969 and S6969), but that you may in fact be in Violation of the Great Act of 2002 of Blogging Legal Untruths and Psychological Diagnoses Via Remote Domain With No Foreknown Knowledge of Pseudonymous Subject (NYHR8.003.004, .007). Please cease and desist.</p>
<p>You have been notified!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. BLT</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52940</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. BLT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 05:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52940</guid>
		<description>It never hurts to pursue all avenues, including legal ones, if someone is crossing the line in ways that are potentially damaging and hurtful.  The fact is that Mikey admits that he really doesn&#039;t know anything about me, apart from something he heard &quot;in passing.&quot;  He then goes about planting horrible images in people&#039;s minds about me.  Rumors and innundoes that have no basis in fact are generated by those who are intent on harming you and on damaging your reputation.  It amounts to hate speech, and libel.  We all need to be protected from people like that.  

This does not apply to most people here.  Gavin and Brad R. seem very nice to me,  and I consider them to be friends of mine.  Moreover, some of you actually prefer to argue with my politics as adults and refuse to resort to cheap shots just because you don&#039;t agree with me.  Though many of you can&#039;t stand me, you know how to ridicule me without crossing the line.  I don&#039;t always like it, sometimes it is a bit hurtful, but other times I just have to learn to laugh at myself and not take myself so seriously.  But there are a couple of you out there, you know who you are, who don&#039;t have any self-discipline and are very reckless and irresponsible with your comments.  Those are the people that should be thinking twice before hitting that &quot;submit comment&quot; button.  A person can only be pushed so far, and then they will do whatever is necessary and within their legal right to defend themselves against unfair personal attacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It never hurts to pursue all avenues, including legal ones, if someone is crossing the line in ways that are potentially damaging and hurtful.  The fact is that Mikey admits that he really doesn&#8217;t know anything about me, apart from something he heard &#8220;in passing.&#8221;  He then goes about planting horrible images in people&#8217;s minds about me.  Rumors and innundoes that have no basis in fact are generated by those who are intent on harming you and on damaging your reputation.  It amounts to hate speech, and libel.  We all need to be protected from people like that.  </p>
<p>This does not apply to most people here.  Gavin and Brad R. seem very nice to me,  and I consider them to be friends of mine.  Moreover, some of you actually prefer to argue with my politics as adults and refuse to resort to cheap shots just because you don&#8217;t agree with me.  Though many of you can&#8217;t stand me, you know how to ridicule me without crossing the line.  I don&#8217;t always like it, sometimes it is a bit hurtful, but other times I just have to learn to laugh at myself and not take myself so seriously.  But there are a couple of you out there, you know who you are, who don&#8217;t have any self-discipline and are very reckless and irresponsible with your comments.  Those are the people that should be thinking twice before hitting that &#8220;submit comment&#8221; button.  A person can only be pushed so far, and then they will do whatever is necessary and within their legal right to defend themselves against unfair personal attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoatBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52792</link>
		<dc:creator>GoatBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 00:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52792</guid>
		<description>Timmah, just ignero him&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timmah, just ignero him&gt;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marky</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52612</link>
		<dc:creator>marky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 16:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52612</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who finds that DrBlt&#039;s comments make no sense at all?
He makes pasty look cogent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who finds that DrBlt&#8217;s comments make no sense at all?<br />
He makes pasty look cogent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmah420</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52606</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmah420</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 15:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52606</guid>
		<description>BC_bud. Please just stop. You\&#039;re giving a bad name to bud smokers everywhere. If you don\&#039;t see what\&#039;s wrong with what Patrick did, you probably never will.

Oh and BLT, posting your responses, then posting another obvious comment under anonymous was hilarious. You do realize how easy it is to figure you out by your writing style no?

Anonymous:\&quot;Who meee? Why *I\&#039;m* not BLT. Well I don\&#039;t care who you think I am!\&quot; LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BC_bud. Please just stop. You\&#8217;re giving a bad name to bud smokers everywhere. If you don\&#8217;t see what\&#8217;s wrong with what Patrick did, you probably never will.</p>
<p>Oh and BLT, posting your responses, then posting another obvious comment under anonymous was hilarious. You do realize how easy it is to figure you out by your writing style no?</p>
<p>Anonymous:\&#8221;Who meee? Why *I\&#8217;m* not BLT. Well I don\&#8217;t care who you think I am!\&#8221; LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC_bud</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52585</link>
		<dc:creator>BC_bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 02:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52585</guid>
		<description>this looks like its become a ginormus pissing contest between gop-kid and gaven, with the little guys gett&#039;n sandwiched unfairly in the middle.,

in my mind gavens coming off just as bad for prodding and prodding.  why not just ignero him&gt;?  instead youve taken it on yourselv to continue this, id say encourging him on.

big wanker in myya miond is gaven for not lettn this go!!!!!1!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this looks like its become a ginormus pissing contest between gop-kid and gaven, with the little guys gett&#8217;n sandwiched unfairly in the middle.,</p>
<p>in my mind gavens coming off just as bad for prodding and prodding.  why not just ignero him&gt;?  instead youve taken it on yourselv to continue this, id say encourging him on.</p>
<p>big wanker in myya miond is gaven for not lettn this go!!!!!1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jillian</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52573</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 00:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52573</guid>
		<description>D&#039;you have any idea how difficult it is to prove either libel or slander against a public celebrity in the United States?  It&#039;s all but impossible - even Tom Cruise doesn&#039;t have a guaranteed shot at winning his cases against the National (&quot;Tom Cruise is a HOMO!&quot;) Enquirer.  Usually, just the threat of a suit cases them to back down.....but the case itself isn&#039;t assured of being  won, should it be brought before the bar.  

Poor Doc Sammich&#039;s (repeatedly self-acknowledged) international fame and acclaim will all but rob him of the ability to stand in a libel case in America.  If he wants to shell out for a nice British solicitor, however, I&#039;m sure he&#039;d have a better chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#8217;you have any idea how difficult it is to prove either libel or slander against a public celebrity in the United States?  It&#8217;s all but impossible &#8211; even Tom Cruise doesn&#8217;t have a guaranteed shot at winning his cases against the National (&#8220;Tom Cruise is a HOMO!&#8221;) Enquirer.  Usually, just the threat of a suit cases them to back down&#8230;..but the case itself isn&#8217;t assured of being  won, should it be brought before the bar.  </p>
<p>Poor Doc Sammich&#8217;s (repeatedly self-acknowledged) international fame and acclaim will all but rob him of the ability to stand in a libel case in America.  If he wants to shell out for a nice British solicitor, however, I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;d have a better chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marq</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52572</link>
		<dc:creator>Marq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 00:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52572</guid>
		<description>Oops. An extra &quot;a.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops. An extra &#8220;a.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marq</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52571</link>
		<dc:creator>Marq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 00:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52571</guid>
		<description>Hey, mikey, there&#039;s no &lt;i&gt;need &lt;/i&gt;to &quot;visualize&quot; Legend In His Own Mind, Dr. BLT, when there&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://sadlyno.com/archives/001965.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a perfectly &quot;lovely&quot; portrait of the good Doc&lt;/a&gt; right here! &quot;Enjoy!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, mikey, there&#8217;s no <i>need </i>to &#8220;visualize&#8221; Legend In His Own Mind, Dr. BLT, when there&#8217;s a <a href="http://sadlyno.com/archives/001965.html" rel="nofollow">a perfectly &#8220;lovely&#8221; portrait of the good Doc</a> right here! &#8220;Enjoy!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New York Law Firm</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52570</link>
		<dc:creator>New York Law Firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 00:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52570</guid>
		<description>[â™«whistlesâ™«]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[â™«whistlesâ™«]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sifu Tweety</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52529</link>
		<dc:creator>Sifu Tweety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 20:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52529</guid>
		<description>Dangit, seriously, how come nobody ever tries to out me?

I&#039;m ready and waiting, and what delectable secrets I contain!

I promise to make fun of you Patrick, will that help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dangit, seriously, how come nobody ever tries to out me?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m ready and waiting, and what delectable secrets I contain!</p>
<p>I promise to make fun of you Patrick, will that help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigrismus</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52514</link>
		<dc:creator>tigrismus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 18:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52514</guid>
		<description>&quot;Defamation&quot; requires it be stated as fact.  I think you&#039;d have a hard time convincing any judge that &quot;[w]hen I visualize him at home, the images I get are quite disturbing&quot; does not remove the whole statement from the domain of libel and into that of free expression of opinion not presented as fact, even if you were represented by the finest of the New York Law Firm partners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Defamation&#8221; requires it be stated as fact.  I think you&#8217;d have a hard time convincing any judge that &#8220;[w]hen I visualize him at home, the images I get are quite disturbing&#8221; does not remove the whole statement from the domain of libel and into that of free expression of opinion not presented as fact, even if you were represented by the finest of the New York Law Firm partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoatBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52504</link>
		<dc:creator>GoatBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 16:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52504</guid>
		<description>Well then drop a dime already, &lt;b&gt;anonymust&lt;/b&gt;.  It&#039;s such an open and shut case I&#039;m sure the New York Law Firm will be champing at the bit to take this one on contingency.

Alert Nancy Grace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then drop a dime already, <b>anonymust</b>.  It&#8217;s such an open and shut case I&#8217;m sure the New York Law Firm will be champing at the bit to take this one on contingency.</p>
<p>Alert Nancy Grace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52500</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 16:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52500</guid>
		<description>Mikey&#039;s statement is &quot;a written..defamatory statement or representation that conveys an unjustly unfavorable impression. It is also a &quot;statement or representation published without just cause and tending to expose another to public contempt.&quot;  You are correct, tigrimus, it more aptly falls under the category of libel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikey&#8217;s statement is &#8220;a written..defamatory statement or representation that conveys an unjustly unfavorable impression. It is also a &#8220;statement or representation published without just cause and tending to expose another to public contempt.&#8221;  You are correct, tigrimus, it more aptly falls under the category of libel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigrismus</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52487</link>
		<dc:creator>tigrismus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 15:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52487</guid>
		<description>It would be libel, not slander, and as what was said was clearly mikey&#039;s &quot;envisioning&quot;(and stated to be such), you are, in my opinion and speaking purely on the legal merits of your statement, full of beans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be libel, not slander, and as what was said was clearly mikey&#8217;s &#8220;envisioning&#8221;(and stated to be such), you are, in my opinion and speaking purely on the legal merits of your statement, full of beans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52456</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52456</guid>
		<description>Whoever you think I am doesn&#039;t really matter to me, so long as the message gets out that cheap shots can come with a high price tag.  Those who are educated on their rights understand that there can be serious consequences for a commenter intent on maligning someone&#039;s character by uttering injuriously misleading statements that are not based in fact.  Some people take comfort in hiding behind a screen name but to an attorney with resources, finding the person&#039;s real identity is not a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever you think I am doesn&#8217;t really matter to me, so long as the message gets out that cheap shots can come with a high price tag.  Those who are educated on their rights understand that there can be serious consequences for a commenter intent on maligning someone&#8217;s character by uttering injuriously misleading statements that are not based in fact.  Some people take comfort in hiding behind a screen name but to an attorney with resources, finding the person&#8217;s real identity is not a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/2811.html#comment-52452</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 09:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadlyno.com/archives/002811.html#comment-52452</guid>
		<description>thank goodness you have been around so long anonymous.  i remeber your comment from Christmas 2004 - that one was so funny!  anyway, thanks for letting us all know what is what.

oh, and just post under your real name Dr. BLT.  because then I know to keep scrolling.  it saves me time.  and you are so considerate of others....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank goodness you have been around so long anonymous.  i remeber your comment from Christmas 2004 &#8211; that one was so funny!  anyway, thanks for letting us all know what is what.</p>
<p>oh, and just post under your real name Dr. BLT.  because then I know to keep scrolling.  it saves me time.  and you are so considerate of others&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

