Comments on: Two-Minute Townhall v. 120-Second Townhall Death Match!

By: Rimfax

Rimfax — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:58:20 +0000

Look dork, Jacob Sullum is a libertarian, not a Republican. He's waaaaaaay more of a privacy wacko than you could ever dream of being. He's written a book on drug prohibition titled Saying Yes, for pete's sake. If you're gonna make fun of him for being a political wingnut, at least make fun of the wing that he's actually on. His response over on a libertarian blog is, "They Have to Be Wrong, Even When I Agree With Them"

By: GILMORE

GILMORE — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:20:49 +0000

Thats a complete misrepresentation of Sullum, FWIW

His articles on NSA and Executive Excess…

http://www.reason.com/sullum/022206.shtml
http://www.reason.com/sullum/022206.shtml

If you think that constitutes apologism i dont know what you’re smoking.

By: Mike Nilsen

Mike Nilsen — Fri, 19 May 2006 23:59:59 +0000

Wow, great tabulated wankery. You should try the ‘Wank-cel’ Wankery Analysis Spreadheet, though. It pull data directly from those new NSA databases, too!

By: Bill S

Bill S — Fri, 19 May 2006 07:00:43 +0000

Gary Ruppert CAN’T be real. Nobody could possibly say something that stupid and actually MEAN it.

By: Buffalo Gal

Buffalo Gal — Fri, 19 May 2006 05:15:49 +0000

I love how in Ben’s column he refutes the notion that certain people in history were homosexual by pointing out they were married.

Like Oscar Wilde?

By: Freshly Squeezed Cynic

Freshly Squeezed Cynic — Fri, 19 May 2006 01:28:54 +0000

If I’m not mistaken, those boys may have painted some schools or something, as well.

And Ghandi rose from the dead just to tell them what a good job they’d done.

By: Pere Ubu

Pere Ubu — Fri, 19 May 2006 00:03:20 +0000

Some people in the media saw the Duke rape case from day one as a matter of taking sides rather than seeking the truth. They want to be on the politically correct side and the facts be damned. That’s why I’m pretty sure those white boys are innocent.

As long as the accusations don’t keep them from selling their kidneys at a fair market price.

By: Hysterical Woman

Hysterical Woman — Thu, 18 May 2006 22:29:50 +0000

Also: Harvey Milk was important among gay people, but gay people aren’t important. Despite the fact I talk about them all the time.

By: ChrisS

ChrisS — Thu, 18 May 2006 21:37:17 +0000

120 second TH gets teh win.

By: Otto Man

Otto Man — Thu, 18 May 2006 21:35:40 +0000

Koko the Monkey is a great deal smarter than John Stossel, too.

By: TravisG

TravisG — Thu, 18 May 2006 19:48:46 +0000

If I’m not mistaken, those boys may have painted some schools or something, as well.

By: Freshly Squeezed Cynic

Freshly Squeezed Cynic — Thu, 18 May 2006 19:22:12 +0000

Shorter Kathleen Parker:

“So those kids may have raped a stripper. Look, they get straight A’s! Doesn’t that count for anything?”

By: Gavin M.

Gavin M. — Thu, 18 May 2006 18:20:19 +0000

Guess what? If you are “open to committing homosexual acts,” YOU ARE GAY. Period, end of story.

Well, you know, it’s not like a binary thing.

I mean, it’s possible as a male to have sex with other men, yet still prefer any woman to Ben Shapiro.

By: Marq

Marq — Thu, 18 May 2006 15:07:52 +0000

Talking about homosexuality is really not so different from participating in actual gay sex. Or so I’ve heard.

Oh, that reminds me–speaking of hot, gay sex….

By: Mark

Mark — Thu, 18 May 2006 14:32:12 +0000

I love how in Ben’s column he refutes the notion that certain people in history were homosexual by pointing out they were married. Gee, it makes one wonder why rumors about Tom Cruise still linger.

By: Timmah420

Timmah420 — Thu, 18 May 2006 14:08:45 +0000

But it can cause a person to be more open to committing homosexual acts, until they are addicted to homosexuality.

Confess dark secrets inadvertently to online strangers much Gare-bear?

I would say among the people I know that homosexuality is not that controversial. Being a twenty-something virgin, on the other hand… that’s a little weird if you ask me.
Fucking bingo.

By: JK47

JK47 — Thu, 18 May 2006 13:26:57 +0000

Sadie, I suspect our little friend is so far in the closet that he doesn’t realize what he’s just admitted to us. Self-knowledge isn’t exactly the Republicans’ forte.

You can’t spell “Gary” without G-A-Y.

By: elendil

elendil — Thu, 18 May 2006 12:36:57 +0000

Why does the Ben Shapiro gay-sex link point to Microsoft Corporation? Is there a clever “Ben Shapiro has a 3 1/4 inch floppy” joke that I’m missing, or is Bill Gates finally implementing his plans of world domination (starting with Ben Shapiro)?

By: BenA

BenA — Thu, 18 May 2006 12:22:54 +0000

Not happy with your elected Republican officials? The only solution is to vote for them and get more people to do the same.

Hey…maybe there is some chance for common ground between the right and the “left”…this sounds like what a lot of progressive Democrats have to say about their party.

By: JK47

JK47 — Thu, 18 May 2006 12:11:49 +0000

But it can cause a person to be more open to committing homosexual acts, until they are addicted to homosexuality.

That’s the funniest thing I’ve read here in a while.

Guess what? If you are “open to committing homosexual acts,” YOU ARE GAY. Period, end of story. I live in Los Angeles and I’m a professional musician. I live in a very gay-friendly neighborhood. Lots of my friends and colleagues are gay. I’ve been hit on by gay guys. But you know what? On the few occasions that has happened, I just politely told them I’m not gay. BECAUSE I’M NOT GAY.

You Xians who talk about the delicious, tempting sin of homosexuality like it’s some secret, hedonistic pleasure are SO FUCKING GAY.