Irene

Via Alternet: http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002807.htm

Disturbing if true. Heh, indeed.

Heh. Just accidently outed myself as the Godfather of teh Ghey. Pay no attention to the above.

Oh, dear dear dear dear. Someone just takes this all a little too seriously.

LOL*!!!

* literally true

She looks like an anorexic Fabio.

Re: the new troll: Perhaps it’s more like “LoveToWatchLiberalsCryCuzThey’reLaughingSoHardAt,NotWith,Me”. S,N! eats trolls for breakfast, provided there’s any room left over after the fetus fritatta.

ps: His book about religious values came out first.

Uh yeah – Skipper from HELL!

Hell yes! I dunno about y’all, but eating a dead fetus every Sunday is the highlight of my week.”

-Yes because I can see how liberal intellectualism would convey the sacrament of abortion to imply cannibalism. Actually, I don’t know why you would admit to something like that anyway. Aren’t liberals creature-loving vegetarians? “we won’t stomach the feast of a cow, but full-term unborn babies – bring ‘em on”. Sadly given the history of liberal arguments, that idea would not be so far- fetched. Liberals literally give people like Coulter the fire and power to make fun of them because it’s SO easy to do.

“-its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the “absolute moral authority” of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland)
Because clearly, people who have sacrificed loved ones or limbs for their country have no moral authority.”

-Cindy Sheehan had the sympathy and respect of every citizen of this country. She was the one who politicized it by carrying out some laim agenda – driven by liberals who needed to selfishly allow this woman to writhe in her own pain and restrict her from beginning to move on. As a result, she turned out crazy (a perfect representation of the Democratic party). Max Cleland did not lose his limbs in combat. HE DID NOT win a purple heart. Again, liberals lied about this to run a phony war hero as a scam to argue for surrender. I know this might be a little too much for a liberal to understand, but it’s a little something we like to call the truth.

“Also, “science” is a liberal plot to convince white people that the Earth is round and that black people aren’t inferior. You heard it here first.”

Apparently you missed the part where the “science” was labeled “bogus”. But again, I can see how a liberal’s intellect would lead him to interpret such a thought as “all science is bogus and means nothing”.

“I can’t wait to see how Ann Coulter, a nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize in Wingnutology, debunks the cornerstone theory of biology. Really, this should be a blast.”

Biology is a clinical science with theories and documentation that actual scientists support. I’m assuming that you will be the first one in line to buy the book since you “can’t wait to see”.

“Because evolution totally claims to disprove the existence of God, Ann. Geez, I’m glad you spent so much time reading about evolutionary theory before you wrote a whole book debunking it. ”

There are other scientists and philosophers used in the book that have written dozens upon dozens of their own books to denounce the “bogus” theory of evolution. They never get much coverage. The great thing now, is that with a huge megastar like Coulter bringing them in, the process of debunking this crap will finally become normalized. It’s just like when Madonna brings in some crazed musical composer from Africa that nobody’s heard of, or when she introduced “voguing” to the dance floor. These people – through Ann Coulter – will finally have a voice, and the so-called science is actually going to have to be debated openly and honestly.

They can run – but they can’t hide.

Finally, I’m glad Ann Coulter has the power to make you cry like a girl. Should we document Ann Coulter’s effect on whining liberals as “science”?

LOL.

Posted by: Karen

Karen: her boobs are not big enough to make her Barbie, at the best, she could be Skipper.

Posted by: Karen

Karen: her boobs are not big enough to make her Barbie, at the best, she could be Skipper.

Hits too close to home.

Can’t argue with ya there. If I was to follow an actual religion, that one has the most appeal. I just find it easier to have a direct relationship with the divine and skip the ritual parts. I am happy to join others in their rituals, though. If folks don’t believe high mass is high magic they’re, well, high. Pagan rituals are by far the coolest, though no one is getting me skyclad without a hell of a lot of scotch first, and that sort of robs the purity of purpose thing, no? Isn’t it interesting that all religions use chanting as a way to focus the spiritual energy? There’s a dissertation in there somewhere, and I’m sure someone has written it. :)