1. Round up all illegals.
2.
3. Profit!

Packs of heavily armed attack squid. Let’s get on it, people!

Or fricking sharks with laser beams on their heads.

Packs of heavily armed attack squid. Let’s get on it, people!

The Gulf of California is already lousy with swarms of Humblodt squid (some pics here). We just need to stock the Gulf of Mexico with ‘em. ; )

Wait, except the idea to eliminate the penny.

It’s a good thing only the social conservatives can be bothered to turn up for rallies, because if they all ran into each other, they’d fight like six cats in a small bag.

Packs of heavily armed attack squid. Let’s get on it, people!

And, you know, every time I read or hear Alan Keyes, the They Might Be Giants song “Kiss Me, Son Of God” goes through my head.

There’s a perverse pleasure in watching this take place. Sure, we’re all getting screwed by this unholy alliance, but they’re screwing each other as well. Sooner or later the Christians will realise that you can’t serve both God and Mammon at the same time. But by then, it will be too late. Evangelical Pentacostalism will forever be remembered as the religion that excused a war based on lies, and brought a nation to the brink of destruction. With a bit of luck, they will be the final nail in “Christianity’s” coffin, and we’ll never hear from that ignorant, hateful religion again.

I also have no idea what this means. It sounds kinda penguinish or illegal in a assault sorta way.

“the Spanish have decided to take over our national anthem”

Those bastards! First they pull out of Iraq on us and now this! What next? Running of the Bulls in Chicago?

Excellent analysis of the Gee Oh Pee. I have argued these exact points with conservacretins and their moral values shtick. The “moral majority” crowd went into a moral circle jerk when Reagan got elected, thinking Roe v. Wade was doomed and he just made a lame attempt at a constitutional ammendment and then dropped it, focusing instead on rewarding the rich. Stupid fuckers!

Well, duh. That’s exactly why we need step 6 after having enacted steps 1 – 3. Otherwise getting rid of all illegals would be endangering America’s ability to remain competitive on the global market.

I believe this must now be changed to “No one expects the Freedom Inquisition!”

Oh well, I guess to a wingnut, brown is just brown. But I do know this means we can’t afford to build a mesh border fence. Verily, it is easier for an Islamofascist to pass through the holes in a sieve, from Mexico, then for Dear Leader to find Osama.

César Chávez–”liberal” union buster! I like it! We need to design a T-shirt for it…

Really, though, the disconnect from reality never ceases to be breathtaking: on the one-hand, preponderantly Republican businesses import /hire illegal immigrants in an attempt to circumvent wage and worker safety regulations; on the other hand, many “liberals” (make sure you sneer when you say the word) believe that such regulations should apply to whomever is hired in this country, and many “liberals” (sneer) also believe that employers should be held accountable for breaking immigration laws. Yet, somehow, the former is known as “Securing America’s Borders,” while the latter is “Union Busting.” QED.

Unfortunately, the real reason they don’t want Mexicans (or ‘The Spanish’) here is not economics, legal propriety or even simple selfishness; it’s racism. That’s why arguments along economic or legal lines are always so lame; their hearts aren’t in it.

http://www.homelanddecency.com – “marching proudly backwards to our future”