Apr
27

En hommage to Miguel




Posted at 4:27 by HTML Mencken

wINGNUTSpARTYHATS.jpg

pyjamamediaX.jpg

HAHAHAHA LOOK AT THE RETARDEDS!!!!! IT IS TO FUNNY FOREVER!!!1!

ARE YOU NOT MEN?

“We are wingnuto hehindeed!!!

oh baldy dorkfart, the Amish wingnut lady did eat your hat???

“YOOSTAHAVE HAT, YOOSTABEE DEMOCRAT!!!”

Amish lady or Holly Hobbie? it is a mystery.

“GLASSIFY MECCA!!!!”

EEEK IT IS A TRICK CREATURE!!! ISLAMS BEWARE!!!!

tomfriedmanX.jpg

hahah look it is a wingnut muppet. we have no fearing. it will not eat muslims. it is only a funny.

“BLARRRG1!!1!! THE WORLD IS FLAT SO DONT HIT THE BRAKES OR YOUL THROW THE BABY OUT WITH THE BATHWATER!!!”

why is this crazy talk? why does wingnut muppet not say “borgy borg borg”?? it is a mystery.

liddythong2.jpg

eeeek it is a patriot creature! stop my eyes!!1!

“LOOK AND I SHALL MUTATE YOUR DNA!!”

the creature burns my retina!! they bleed inside help help!!!

“THIS IS HOW I KILL THE JOURNALISTS!!!!”

and everyone else to0 uncle sam wingnut creature!!!! AIIEEEEEEEEEEEE MUST ESC—



voxday2.jpg

hahahha silly wingnut has yarmulke hair!! it is innpossible??

it is the stupidist haircut evar!!1! ok second stupidist1!!!1!

I will fix you wingnut!

voxday.jpg

THERE!! it is helpful yes?!

it is a burger king wingnut!!!

“HIYA!!!!!”

please it is a girl do not beat her burger king wingnut!!

peterbeinart2.jpg

Oh it is easter bunny wingnut!!!! cute easter bunny do you have a chocolate for me?? or only poop??

WAR WAR WAR

oh it is poop from a retarded.

hitchens-wastedX4.jpg

A lampshade on a beanbag. no wingnuts. we are safe at last?? something is a secret. there is pee smell and whiskey stink everywhere.

hitchens-wastedX2.jpg

“RRRRARRRRRRRRRRR!!! STRANGLE THE PACIFISTS!!!!!!

it is a trickbeast! he is made of booze!!! and he has opened his eyes in the swiming pool??

“A POOL OF JOHNNIE WALKER YOU FUCKING FAT SLAG!!”

IT IS A BLIND DRUNK WINGNUT!!! TO SCAREY!!!

Dafydd%20ab%AbHughLime.jpg

look! it is the wingnut beast! it is made of dork!1! please stop!1!!

“but you are a klingon muslim. my hat is a green poop and will get you!!! arooooooblaaaaaaaargg”

PLEASE DONTT FASER ME WINGNERD!!!

klohahaX.jpg

AHHHHHHH IT IS A WINGNUT PORK GENIE!!!! HOW DID THE BEANBAG FIT IN A BOTTLE?? IT DID EAT MITT ROMNEY??

“I will grant three wishes.”

OH WINGNUT GENIE I WISH YOU WERE NOT MADE OF HAM, I WISH YOU WOULD NOT EAT ALL THE LIBERALS, I WISH YOU WOULD NOT TALK LIKE YOU WANT TO HUMP DICK CHENEY!!

“BLAAARGH I WILL EAT YOU!!!”

IT IS A EAT ATTACK!!! HELP!!1!

70 Comments »

  1. Edmund Schluessel said,

    April 27, 2006 at 13:10

    You’re weird.

  2. agum said,

    April 27, 2006 at 13:11

    What is the Lopez hat? Evil offspring of the Queen Mother and soon-to-be ex-King Gyanendra?

    Here is a rich source of hat fun:

    http://images.google.com/images?q=gyanendra

  3. Anonymous said,

    April 27, 2006 at 13:11

    !!!!!!!

  4. Sadly, No! said,

    April 27, 2006 at 13:36

    You’re weird.

    And he’s ours! Bwahaha.

  5. Charlotte Smith said,

    April 27, 2006 at 13:45

    Sweet.

  6. Shygetz said,

    April 27, 2006 at 13:45

    OK, from now on, all wingnuts appearing on Sadly, No! must be wearing a hat (preferably a Devo hat).

  7. N.C. said,

    April 27, 2006 at 13:49

    YES

  8. LACJ said,

    April 27, 2006 at 14:18

    Oh man that is too freaking funny. You crazy man, jes crazy

  9. Jillian said,

    April 27, 2006 at 14:42

    After seeing that picture of G. Gordon Liddy, I will never, ever, ever, ever, ever again be able to touch the flesh of a man without wincing. I may not even be able to touch myself without wincing.

  10. Johnny Pi said,

    April 27, 2006 at 14:43

    A Fat Girls In Party Hats tribute? The Internet sure does cross-pollinate in the strangest ways. Are you gonna get Seanbaby to guest-post someday?

  11. GoatBoy said,

    April 27, 2006 at 14:59

    I love you guys!

    /Bizarro Cartman

  12. Mal de mer said,

    April 27, 2006 at 15:21

    Kewl.

  13. sohei said,

    April 27, 2006 at 15:28

    pwnd! Wingnuts r teh suck! ROTHLMAO!!1!

    Dude, I about freaking died over here. You rule.

    btw, who is the “silly wingnut [with] yarmulke hair”? He looks like Anton LeVey’s little brother.

  14. TravisG said,

    April 27, 2006 at 15:33

    He is Vox Day, whom I like to call Satan’s Nerdy Kid Brother. (Great minds, apparently thinking alike and whatnot, I suppose.)

  15. Yosef said,

    April 27, 2006 at 15:34

    Wow.

  16. Jeff said,

    April 27, 2006 at 15:49

    This is what is meant by “tour de force”.

  17. ChrisS said,

    April 27, 2006 at 15:50

    It is indeed a strange combination of Jeff K., Fat Girls in Party Hats, and Cliff Yablonski.

    *shudder*

    But … I … can’t … stop … laughing …

  18. Thorlac said,

    April 27, 2006 at 15:51

    Simply outstanding.

  19. Pere Ubu said,

    April 27, 2006 at 16:42

    Dammit, Montalban!

    Are you going to pay for the Boraxo I’m going to need to clean my brain of that Liddy picture?

  20. Dan Someone said,

    April 27, 2006 at 17:14

    Not to get too serious in the comments to this post, but I actually read one of the links, the interview with Chazmo by John Hawkins. There is no date on it, but it is pre-Iraq War, and it contains this interesting tidbit:

    John Hawkins: After Iraq, do you see us moving against Iran militarily? Why so?

    Charles Johnson: Iran is an interesting problem, because they have a huge disaffected younger generation that is very pro-American, and increasingly connected to the Internet. The possibility that an internal revolt could result in regime change is more realistic for Iran than for Iraq. We may not have to do much to help it along.

    I can’t bear to go looking, so does anybody have the Chazzer’s most recent views on Iran? If he is at or near the “we’re gonna have to nuke those bastards” end of the spectrum now, I wonder if he has given any thought as to how we got from where he himself said we were pre-Iraq to here.

  21. teh l4m3 said,

    April 27, 2006 at 17:18

    You know I gave you the idea for that a couple of weeks ago…

    “HAHA AH his name is Grover Norquist. Grover or Cookie Monster I ask! ‘BLARGHHH!1!!’ wHY does Mister Buttertroll wnat to eat my thigh? It is a mystery.”

    God I miss Seanbaby and Fat Chicks IN Party Hats (heading over to google…)

  22. D. Sidhe said,

    April 27, 2006 at 18:12

    Yes! Come over to the dark side, Jillian. None of us look like that picture, I promise.
    Well, Ann Coulter might in another twenty years. But the rest of us are okay.

  23. Andrew Byrne said,

    April 27, 2006 at 18:16

    engorgeous

  24. Mal de mer said,

    April 27, 2006 at 18:25

    Iran is an interesting problem, because they have a huge disaffected younger generation that is very pro-American, and increasingly connected to the Internet.

    He heard that particular bit of spew from Karen Hughes (absolutely the dumbest person in the whole freaking world), who opined that Iranian women’s love of lipstick was proof of Iran’s pro-Americanism.

    It’s true Iranian youth are disaffected, but there’s nothing like totally misassessing the situation to make sure you really screw up later.

  25. Kathleen said,

    April 27, 2006 at 18:35

    Words fail me.

  26. Mary Jones said,

    April 27, 2006 at 18:53

    It’s true Iranian youth are disaffected, but there’s nothing like totally misassessing the situation to make sure you really screw up later.

    Actually, I think in this one case, ol’ Chazzy’s right. Let me qualify that: the only way for Iran to change–if they want to change, and given the demonstrations over the past few years, they probably do–is if it wants to change. Let the disaffected youth rise up, and all that.

    Most Iranians don’t necessarily hate Americans. Hell, there were vigils held in Iran after 9/11. But that doesn’t mean they want us to invade and change their government for them. We did that once, and they (rightly) never forgave us for it.

    Or am I misreading what you’re saying?

  27. blogenfreude said,

    April 27, 2006 at 19:09

    Thank you thank you.

  28. GuinnessGuy said,

    April 27, 2006 at 19:14

    See, this is what I was expecting from a guy named Retardo- not any of that “serious policy discussion/bemoaning” crap.
    Good show… good show.

  29. mikey said,

    April 27, 2006 at 19:25

    I THINK I get it. But I’m not sure. I might just be laughing at the English Grammar. But maybe that’s the funny? I do like the idea of wingnuts in party hats. And I’m pretty clear that Miguel is funny, in a semi-unintentional fashion.

    Nope, I’m sure of it. I don’t get it. But then, I’m kind of old…

    mikey

  30. Mal de mer said,

    April 27, 2006 at 19:29

    Or am I misreading what you’re saying?

    No, not at all. And Chazmo was essentially correct, but both he and Hughes misinterpet the attaction of consumer products…some American, like Hollywood blockbusters, some not…like lipstick. That attraction doesn’t mean foreigners aspire to be Americans, which is what people like Hughes think.

    Honestly, who the hell wants to be like Chazmo and Karen Hughes and all those other prime specimens of human evolution found in Wingnuttia?

  31. Dan Someone said,

    April 27, 2006 at 20:09

    But Chazmo, back before the war, was essentially right that there were possibilities — leveraging the disaffected youth (and the moderate secular government leadership) — to rehabilitate Iran and avoid the impending clusterfuck we’re facing now.

  32. Mal de mer said,

    April 27, 2006 at 20:18

    Well, I think Chazmo should forget about disaffected Iranian youth and concentrate on the dissafected genocidal maniacs who post on his site.

    The Iranians reading that know he and his posse don’t have their best interests at heart.

  33. celticgirl said,

    April 27, 2006 at 20:22

    Retardo, if you don’t take back that picture of Liddy in that freaking Speedo I will hunt you down to the ends of the earth and make your life a LIVING MISERY!

    Won’t someone think of the children?

  34. Vestal Vespa said,

    April 27, 2006 at 20:47

    Beautiful. You simply can’t touch the magic of photoshopping silly hats on people.

  35. Oh, FTLOG! said,

    April 27, 2006 at 21:36

    You have totally found it now…perfection!

    V.V. – photoshop? But…but…nooooo! Those are real pics.

  36. Liddysthong said,

    April 27, 2006 at 21:37

    Get me outta here!!!

  37. mikey said,

    April 27, 2006 at 21:41

    I dunno, there’s just GOTTA be a way to explain this, even to the wingnut community. Something like:

    Look, guys. Say you have a population that LIKES Americans. I’m thinking, for example, your “disaffected Iranian Youth”. Now that’s a good thing, and they might be somewhat predisposed to see things your way.

    Now, pay attention here, this is the money shot. If you drop a bunch of bombs on them, kill there moms and dads and goats and goldfish, they are NOT going to like you very much anymore. I mean, you can see how killing their families and wrecking their shit is going to bum them out, right?

    If you do these things, from that point forward they are going to be somewhat predisposed to KILL YOU and wreck YOUR shit. I mean, for a wingnut, that response would make sense if it was you, right? I mean, some brown muslamonazikillersglobal wrecked a couple of buildings and now you, wingnuttia, have a hardon for the entire global muslim population. So maybe make an extra-special effort to think this one through, ok?

    Just Sayin’

    mikey

  38. Dr. Squid said,

    April 27, 2006 at 22:07

    That’s some bad hat, Harry.

  39. Hysterical Woman said,

    April 27, 2006 at 22:11

    Sorry, liddy’s throng. You have to stay where you are or we all go insane.

  40. Dan Someone said,

    April 27, 2006 at 22:22

    Mikey, even more: If you drop bombs on their next-door neighbor, and invade and start tromping around the neighbor’s country, and lump them together with the neighbor (whom they detest) as parts of an “Axis of Evil” — well, no matter how well-disposed some of them might be toward you, they’re going to be concerned. Perhaps concerned enough to tip the precarious balance a little bit more toward extremism, just enough to, say, elect a raving lunatic with nuclear ambitions in place of the moderate who was acting as somewhat of a counterpoint to the ayatollahs. And then, voila! A self-fulfilling prophecy of destruction as two idiots vie to see which is more insane.

    P.S. – Mikey, could you please drop me a note at swanky_modes at yahoo dot com? I would like to ask you something.

  41. Some Guy said,

    April 27, 2006 at 22:27

    I think we should drop funny hats on them. That’ll show ‘em.

  42. jeff said,

    April 27, 2006 at 23:01

    Drop about 100,000 Devo hats on them … that’ll learn ‘em.

  43. Gentlewoman Geekpockets said,

    April 27, 2006 at 23:10

    Oh Christ, you guys are so fucking sick. I just started laughing so hard I scared my cat. And I think my neighbor is calling the police. Jeebus. Just, wow. This is way more than I ever wanted to know about how your mind works, Retardo.

  44. RETARDEAU said,

    April 27, 2006 at 23:23

    teh is right, this is all her fault.

  45. Raijin said,

    April 27, 2006 at 23:56

    Re: please it is a girl do not beat her burger king wingnut!!

    Found this little gem in the article– “It was truly a place apart – a broken ankle was a cause for mockery and uproarious laughter. . .”

    A dojo like that is a blight on the martial arts. Wingnuts fuck up everything they can get their fucking hands on, I swear.

  46. treep said,

    April 28, 2006 at 0:06

    “wingnut pork genie”

    fucking golden.

  47. annieangel said,

    April 28, 2006 at 1:08

    I’m confused.

  48. Mal de mer said,

    April 28, 2006 at 1:10

    You’re confused?

    *gasp*

  49. annieangel said,

    April 28, 2006 at 1:35

    Explain it to me, mal.

  50. Fulsome said,

    April 28, 2006 at 1:48

    rETARDO, you make my heart sing.

  51. annieangel said,

    April 28, 2006 at 2:49

    I’m the only one here.

    I OWN THIS BOARD.

  52. mikey said,

    April 28, 2006 at 3:43

    Chirp, chirp, chirp, chirp, chirp, Chirp, chirp, chirp, chirp, chirp, Chirp, chirp, chirp, chirp, chirp, Chirp, chirp, chirp, chirp, chirp,

  53. annieangel said,

    April 28, 2006 at 3:48

    *squish* *smear* *silence*

  54. Theophrastus Bombastus von Hoehenheim den Sidste said,

    April 28, 2006 at 3:52

    Are We not Mendacious?

    We are Devoid of Scruples!

    (by coincidence, Jocko Homo is blaring on the gramophone)

  55. teh l4m3 said,

    April 28, 2006 at 4:27

    I knew it!!!1!

    And for those of you who are actually bored enough to clicky-click, it’s the last segment in that crappy post.

  56. Anonymous said,

    April 28, 2006 at 5:03

    Holy shit! I don’t mean to rain on your humorous parade. I loved the post, but holy shit! I read straight through and LMFAO, but then I read it again and did the linky thing.

    I didn’t make it past the LGF link which brought me to “Death Cult Exhibit in Beirut”. I made the simple mistake of reading the comments that accompanied it. I have honestly never done that before.

    OMFG!!!! These people are rabid. WTF???

    “First of all, only about 80 civilians were killed.

    Second of all, they were killed by Israeli shelling while they were taking refuge at a UN camp.”

    “Those people really like to demonstrate don’t they? While they march how about shoving a broom up their assess so they can make themselves useful.”

    I read shit like this and I fear for my kids. This hatred sincerely scares me.

    Is your post hysterically funny? Well, yes. Is is also seriously depressing? Hell, yes!!!!!!!!!

    p.s. Is there any way other than “” in comments to paste in this shit to make it obvious that you’re not saying it? Even the cut and paste is enough to make me wash my hands.

  57. digamma said,

    April 28, 2006 at 5:23

    Whoa.

  58. SuperTroy said,

    April 28, 2006 at 7:09

    Retardo, that was teh Awesum.

  59. Sadly, No! said,

    April 28, 2006 at 9:11

    p.s. Is there any way other than “” in comments to paste in this shit to make it obvious that you’re not saying it?

    Sure — you can use the bockquote tags, enclosed in them thingies greater then and less than, sideways hats sort of things. [blockquote]bla bla [/blockquote]

    But, you know, use them right thingies.

  60. celticgirl said,

    April 28, 2006 at 9:53

    Seb-THANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOU!!!!

    You may have finally freed me from the bonds of HTML impairment!

    Whoo hoo!

  61. Anonymous said,

    April 28, 2006 at 15:44

    I’ve been mocked. I shall never comment again for fear of further anonymous humiliation.

  62. Sadly, No! said,

    April 28, 2006 at 20:05

    Recently, a wingnut pulled shit out of his ass

    The week’s over and The Rant The New Media Journal.us [Wingnuts 'R 'Us] has some Amazing Wingnut Facts (AWF®, AWF is a registered trademark of Sadly, No! Enterprises,) delivered to us through the toaster Lee Ellis: “Bush polls have fallen…

  63. Nancy in Detroit said,

    April 28, 2006 at 22:09

    What the HELL was that??? Whatever it was, my brain read it in the Spongemonkey voice from the Quizno’s commercial. Which was very annoying. Stupid brain.

  64. Theophrastus Bombastus von Hoehenheim den Sidste said,

    April 29, 2006 at 1:48

    Eat a bowl of dick, and Save the Choad!

  65. Pinko Punko said,

    July 31, 2006 at 20:49

    I am reminded of Tommy Boy. “Fat guy in a little coat. Fat guy in a little coat…[rip]..Richard! What’s happening??”

  66. sarah said,

    April 29, 2007 at 21:06

    yep, still funny.

  67. Lesley said,

    April 30, 2007 at 0:09

    Someone needs to concoct a chapeau made of crispy cheesies. Now that would be a hat fit for a wingnit!

    Awesome, just awesome start to Sunday.

  68. cesar said,

    May 12, 2007 at 7:19

    no better therapy than a house by the beach…..

  69. sarah said,

    April 29, 2008 at 21:51

    again, still funny.

  70. ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said,

    March 28, 2009 at 1:14

    This is very concerning. We frogs join all you concerned republicans.
    the frogs | Homepage | 03.27.09 – 6:23 pm | #

Leave a Comment

  • Things of Interest

  • Meta Goodness

  • Clunkers

  • httpbl_stats()