Comments on: Thank You Easter Bunny — Bawk Bawk!

By: RETARDEAU

RETARDEAU — Thu, 20 Apr 2006 02:14:19 +0000

I didn’t mean Zealots as an “organization” — like those who died at Masada — I meant Zealots as a tradition. Jesus was taking after John the Baptist.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 19 Apr 2006 23:12:35 +0000

The Zealots as an organization did not exist “before and after” Christ. There were individual zealots–as in, religious fanatics–before, but Zealots with a capital Z did not exist until long after Christ’s death.

By: D. Sidhe

D. Sidhe — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:21:10 +0000

I’m prepared to offer sexual favors for the answer to Christopher’s question. Okay, the sexual favors I am offering are somewhat substandard, along the lines of a smutty fanfic about Jeff Gannon, but that might actually appeal to the sort of wingnuts who would have the answer to that anyway.

By: kilfarsnar

kilfarsnar — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:12:31 +0000

I just have to say that picture of the screaming rabbit with the bat is absolutely hilarious!

By: Jillian

Jillian — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:47:34 +0000

I think that I may have a new favorite Swank sentence, however... It is part of slaying non-Muslims for in fact Muslims donâ€™t have the right to exist unless they become Muslim.

By: Kathleen

Kathleen — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:30:49 +0000

[the Mass health plan] fails to properly address the problem of poor people being provided free care at the expense of others.

this is one of the great non-Grogan sentences of teh internets.

By: Dan Someone

Dan Someone — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:09:16 +0000

Oooh, tough one for the Randroids! Do I maximize MY benefit by getting cheap healthcare, which has the side effect of assisting others? Or do I deprive the weak and sickly of whatever they cannot scrounge for themselves, knowing that it will increase my costs and misery?

Oh dear….

NORMAN COORDINATE! NORMAN COORDINATE! EEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee…

By: phleabo

phleabo — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 03:02:50 +0000

Christopher,

re: objectivism – looking out for number one involves more than merely considering one’s own welfare first; it’s equally mercilessly necessary that the weak be crushed under your bootheel.

Now, yes, it may be cheaper and more beneficia to have nationalized healthcare, but it inadvertantly involves something that could be construed as altruistic. And as we’re all aware, altruism is the greatest form of evil the world has ever known.

By: Woodrowfan

Woodrowfan — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:50:35 +0000

Christopher: I guess social-Darwinists never get sick!

By: Clif

Clif — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:42:09 +0000

Sexual favors will be considered in exchange for information on my nefarious plans at OTT. Simple spying, however, will be fruitless. Some have already tried the latter approach, and don’t make me name names, without success.

By: Christopher

Christopher — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 20:05:59 +0000

I have a quandry about Libertarianism/Objectivism (Especially Objectivism).

If altruism is the enemy and we should all look out for ourselves first, why shoouldn’t I support big government spending on social welfare?

After all, government funded healthcare is cheaper for me then paying out of my own pocket.

The only disadvantage is that it annoys other people.

If the primary moral and logical directive is “Look out for number one”, then, logically speaking, shouldn’t I embrace big government health care?

I’d really like it if one of these social darwinist types would answer that question.

By: Auguste

Auguste — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:05:49 +0000

I can’t possibly laugh at that, no matter how tempted I am.

By: RETARDEAU

RETARDEAU — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:52:36 +0000

Well, okay.

By: Marq

Marq — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:47:13 +0000

Ms. Jolie and I have been doing it like.. well, like bunnies

Retardo, just because you had your dick shoved up Brad Pitt’s ass while he was screwing Angelina doesn’t mean you were having sex with her, sorry.

By: Gavin M.

Gavin M. — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:58:05 +0000

No doubt Dr. Sebly F. No (a suspiciously Elamitish name if I’ve ever heard one) regrets giving access to his still-malleable clay to this traitorous, appeasement-minded Urukagina-loving filth…

Nice try, Teh. We’re totally linking to you anyway.

By: Tiglath-Ukurligak

Tiglath-Ukurligak — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:46:09 +0000

No doubt Dr. Sebly F. No (a suspiciously Elamitish name if I’ve ever heard one) regrets giving access to his still-malleable clay to this traitorous, appeasement-minded Urukagina-loving filth…

By: Richard Silverstein

Richard Silverstein — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:42:01 +0000

THanks for that link to my post about FDR & his refusal to rescue European Jewish refugees during WWII.

By: RETARDEAU

RETARDEAU — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:06:05 +0000

nah, you shouldn’t be! im the one who fucked up!

By: Gavin M.

Gavin M. — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:03:59 +0000

[abashed]

By: Mal de mer

Mal de mer — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:03:56 +0000

Oh, no, no..it didn’t suck.