Comments on: That’s a bad Sadly, No! Very bad!

By: Frederick

Frederick — Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:47:48 +0000

What if Kathryn Lopez had seen that photo you directed us to, featuring um, male naughty bits? A long hospitalization would have been in order, at a minimum.

Putting K-Lo out of commission for a while is certainly desirable. Do you suppose Ann “Thrax,” Peggy Nooners, and Kathleen Parker would have equally violent reactions?

By: s.z.

s.z. — Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:40:15 +0000

Whoa, Frederick! What if Kathryn Lopez had seen that photo you directed us to, featuring um, male naughty bits? A long hospitalization would have been in order, at a minimum.

By: Frederick

Frederick — Thu, 29 Jan 2004 06:26:05 +0000

Why didn't you refer Amber to the pictures of you posted here? I'm sure Amber would enjoy them a lot. Gail probably would too, and perhaps s.z. You are Arnold Schwarzenegger, right?

By: Frederick

Frederick — Thu, 29 Jan 2004 05:53:32 +0000

Yup, lesbian hands.

That reminds me of the old joke:
Q. What do you call a lesbian with long fingers?
A. Well-hung.

By: s.z.

s.z. — Thu, 29 Jan 2004 00:05:19 +0000

Hey, congrats on the 100,000 visiters! It clearly means that Sadly,No!is a force to be reckoned with, and that no one again will dare doubt your power. And it shows why Amber is making a play for you. But just say no! She has held hands with too many men, and you know what THAT means. Yup, lesbian hands.

By: grandmasterflash

grandmasterflash — Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:02:36 +0000

I am trying to think of a joke about jerking one’s feather.