Mar
15
15
Speaking of, I wonder what’s going on…
…with our evil twin blog?
Something is wrong with US. Bull shit! It’s the big LIE of feminsim.
[...] I am proud of my body. I have never had any plastic surgery and never will. I am proud of my imperfections. My boobs are not huge but they are real; my vagina isn’t a cherry but it’s quite capable to bringing a man to the best orgasm he’s ever had (because I know how to use IT right LOL) and it serves me extremely well when it comes to my own orgasms.
Eek.
That’s just the opposite of what we were thinking about.
dAVE said,
March 15, 2006 at 4:39
that’s a weird site – how do you blame that stuff on feminism?
I suppose in the 1800′s having ribs removed so your corset could be tighter was because of feminism too?
What a nut!
J. Brida said,
March 15, 2006 at 4:53
Feminism caused the objectification of women? Who knew? And it was feminism which caused women to get fake tits and vaginal surgery? Huh.
Well, you can’t say that’s not batshit insane.
Anonymous said,
March 15, 2006 at 5:04
Oh that Raven. If only women would stop getting plastic surgery because they’re big ol’ feminists. I bet Betty Friedan is spinning in her grave over the likes of women like our evil sisters at ARS!
Hey, I thought Raven had declared that she was hanging up the blogging thing. Anyone? Beuller?
Sadly,…
Pinko Punko said,
March 15, 2006 at 5:05
That’s so Raven!
tg said,
March 15, 2006 at 5:07
What a great post! You are absolutely right, the feminist movement has come full circle.
Comment by caltechgirl — 3/14/2006 @ 7:47 pm
Sweet onion chutney! celticgirl has her own evil twin on Sadly, No!‘s evil twin? Is there a Punky Pinkcheeks and The Lamb, too?
Gavin M. said,
March 15, 2006 at 5:10
My penis is not huge, but it is real.
Gavin M. said,
March 15, 2006 at 5:13
Sweet onion chutney! celticgirl has her own evil twin on Sadly, No!’s evil twin?
Oh no, everyone’s going to start going over there and posting as their evil twins…
And Raven is going to be all like, ‘Aaaagh!’ because she hates laughter…
Mal de mer said,
March 15, 2006 at 5:13
She make her vagina sound like Shop-Vac or something.
LA Confidential Pantload said,
March 15, 2006 at 5:30
Wow. That’s…insane. Completely, 100% insane. Why can’t I meet chicks like this?
batgirl said,
March 15, 2006 at 5:40
So much has been written about the mysterious clitoral orgasm that the true, really exquisite and uttery amazing orgasm we CAN experience with a MAN is almost unheard of.
The mysterious CLITORAL orgasm? You mean, the one that most women can give themselves by the age of fifteen?
Although I must admit that a penis-induced orgasm is uttery amazing.
FlipYrWhig said,
March 15, 2006 at 5:42
A cow-induced orgasm is uddery amazing. (Neal Horsley told me that.)
The Ace said,
March 15, 2006 at 5:43
My penis is huge but, sadly, it is not real.
Red and Black said,
March 15, 2006 at 5:51
MRSA? MRSA is the result of vaginal tightening surgeries? And here I was thinking it was the result of natural selection together with antiobiotic overuse.
Buttermyself said,
March 15, 2006 at 6:00
I still go there almost everyday, but it’s not the same since timmah420 stopped posting.
Dan Someone said,
March 15, 2006 at 6:05
Raven — perhaps because she is not a man — doesn’t seem to realize that every orgasm a man has is the “best orgasm he’s ever had.” Really, it has nothing to do with how she uses her vagina. She could use her vagina to store acorns for the winter; it would make no difference to the quality of her man’s orgasms.
Gavin M. said,
March 15, 2006 at 6:12
To trackback or not to trackback…
he could use her vagina to store acorns for the winter; it would make no difference to the quality of her man’s orgasms.
Now there’s no alternative. (‘Scuse me for a second…)
tg said,
March 15, 2006 at 6:22
Shop-Vac, acorn pantry … I wonder why “vagina-envy” never made it into the big psych theories. Those things are AWESOME. From now on, every day is V-E Day.
STH said,
March 15, 2006 at 6:29
Actually it did, tg! Courtesy of psychoanalytic apostate Karen Horney, if memory serves. No, I’m not shitting you, that is her real name. It’s pronounced Horn-eye.
You quit that giggling right now! Don’t make me come back there . . . .
Steve said,
March 15, 2006 at 6:35
Upwards of 90% of women do this [fake an orgasm] on a regular basis.
Upwards of 72% of statistics are made up on the spot!
celticgirl said,
March 15, 2006 at 6:55
Some observations:
1. I have a freaking EVIL TWIN?!!!!
2. Dan Someone: ROFLMAO- My first thought exactly!
3. #3 comment ‘Anonymous’ was actually me (or, perhaps, MY EVIL TWIN!)
Laughing so hard I’m now crying…
J. A. Baker said,
March 15, 2006 at 7:01
The kind of orgasm we get with being truly turned on, stimulated and which requires, *GASP*, a penile penetration!! Oh my.
Lesbian sex sucks- because they cannot replicate the really good sex that only a man and a woman can create. You won’t hear about this in modern magazines though. Or from a feminsist.
Raven, you mean to tell me that there’s no such thing as a vibrator or a dildo?! I’m shocked! Shocked, I tell you!
mr. memento said,
March 15, 2006 at 7:04
dAVE, J. Brida:
Don’t you know? Feminists are TEH EVIL. Therefore all of womenkind’s problems must be due to feminism. QED.
Why, before feminism, women were admired solely for their intelligence, they were never raped, and they all had deep, intense orgasms every time they baked an apple pie or saluted the flag.
Red and Black said,
March 15, 2006 at 7:22
Mr. Memento, of course before the 20th century, working class women never had jobs, right? :P
GuinnessGuy said,
March 15, 2006 at 7:49
Once ‘SteelReserveDude’ starts posting over there, I’ll consider this a real phenomenon- *wink*.
Gavin M. said,
March 15, 2006 at 8:21
Oh, like I’d post under more than a couple of fake names.
No, there’s some genuine 3Bulls and other action over there.
moonbiter said,
March 15, 2006 at 10:02
Lesbian sex sucks … You won’t hear about this in modern magazines though.
Nope, you’ll only hear this from someone who’s never tried it.
merlallen said,
March 15, 2006 at 10:34
Do they have a doctor pbandj?
Jack of None said,
March 15, 2006 at 11:12
Lesbian sex sucks
You’re doing it wrong!
Woodrowfan said,
March 15, 2006 at 13:51
Technically lesbian sex licks, gay male sex sucks.
what??
Hysterical Woman said,
March 15, 2006 at 14:28
If she thinks clitoral orgasms are mysterious, it may be because she doesn’t have one.
Hysterical Woman said,
March 15, 2006 at 14:28
A clitoris, I mean.
Dan Someone said,
March 15, 2006 at 15:10
Lesbian sex sucks- because they cannot replicate the really good sex that only a man and a woman can create. You won’t hear about this in modern magazines though. Or from a feminsist.
And you sure as hell won’t hear it from a lesbian.
Mal de mer said,
March 15, 2006 at 15:14
It’s astonishing really. Raven’s solipsism is impenetrable. What she believes and what she knows is exactly how the world operates for everyone else. Even recent history is nothing other than the result of what she understands of it (which is very little.)
How come there seem to be so many of these types around these day?
D. Sidhe said,
March 15, 2006 at 15:31
Damn this jury duty thing! By the time I get here, all the good snark’s already taken!
apostropher said,
March 15, 2006 at 15:36
Good lord. She makes the Learning to Grok woman look like a Rhodes Scholar.
apostropher said,
March 15, 2006 at 15:38
Learning, Trying, whatever.
Demogenes Aristophanes said,
March 15, 2006 at 15:44
Six dollars a day and a hot lunch is nothing to complain about, D. Sidhe! Plus you probably have the Fonz on your jury! Lucky duckie!
Demogenes Aristophanes said,
March 15, 2006 at 15:46
Six dollars a day and a hot lunch is nothing to complain about, D. Sidhe! Plus you probably have the Fonz on your jury! Lucky duckie!
ACG said,
March 15, 2006 at 15:51
I hate that she tries to blow the whole thing off as a “very long and boring post.” As with the mutterings/shoutings of any crazy homeless woman wearing four coats and pushing a shopping cart full of empty plastic bags around downtown, her post is absolutely fascinating.
Chadwick said,
March 15, 2006 at 16:10
Blah Blah Blah- When are the Cobb (Cobbaggie?) nominations going to go up?
Anne said,
March 15, 2006 at 16:33
I haven’t had a chance to actually read the linked-to post yet (I will at lunch), but I take it this woman not only still believes in the Freudian fallacy of “immature” orgasms (“clitoral”) versus “mature” orgasms (“vaginal”) but is also proud of it, and thinks it makes her a brave voice against feminists? Am I right?
Anne said,
March 15, 2006 at 16:39
I haven’t had a chance to actually read the linked-to post yet (I will at lunch), but I take it this woman not only still believes in the Freudian fallacy of “immature” orgasms (“clitoral”) versus “mature” orgasms (“vaginal”) but is also proud of it, and thinks it makes her a brave voice against feminists? Am I right?
betty friedan said,
March 15, 2006 at 16:40
Anne,
Sadly…yes.
tigrismus said,
March 15, 2006 at 16:42
Hoo boy, has she has given us *way* too much information in that post, breaking clear through the TMI barrier and emerging well into the other side.
rumpuscat said,
March 15, 2006 at 16:54
Lesbian sex sucks? Gosh, I’m afraid I’ll have to inform my girlfriend that this whole time we’ve been having really crappy sex–no thanks to feminism!
tg said,
March 15, 2006 at 16:59
It’s astonishing really. Raven’s solipsism is impenetrable.
Reading her post, I got the idea that it was quite penetrable.
Or maybe I’m confused about what a solipsism is.
FlipYrWhig said,
March 15, 2006 at 17:06
I think this was a solipsgasm.
Michelle said,
March 15, 2006 at 17:08
Lesbian sex sucks?
Oh no, don’t tell the boys, they mightn’t be able to convince girls that they really like to get it on with each other for them.
teh l4m3 said,
March 15, 2006 at 17:29
Tee hee. DA said “hot lunch.”
Mal de mer said,
March 15, 2006 at 17:35
Reading her post, I got the idea that it was quite penetrable.
I only realised later that I missed a prime opportunity for some snark by tying impenetrability to Raven’s rather welcoming vagina, but I’m having an off day.
Can you we have a new post, please?
Strange Forces said,
March 15, 2006 at 17:36
Mal: Hell no. This is some grade-A, prime, choice awesome right here.
celticgirl said,
March 15, 2006 at 17:50
Mal, we’re just getting warmed up. If the evil twin thing can get 200+/- posts, then by God Raven’s vagina should too!
*please please please let Raven come over here and start the name calling thingie*
dAVE said,
March 15, 2006 at 17:54
why is is that self-described conservative types never know a goddamn thing about history?
Is it because they work with history in the premodern/scholarly sense of the word? (i.e. making shit up about how things used to be in order to justify whatever the hell you want)
Does she realize that without feminism, she wouldn’t be writing about sex on her blog, and certainly not talking about her own orgasms.
Her blind spot is as big as the sun.
dAVE said,
March 15, 2006 at 17:55
that’s premodern/prescholarly
Vladi G said,
March 15, 2006 at 18:02
Lesbian sex sucks? Gosh, I’m afraid I’ll have to inform my girlfriend that this whole time we’ve been having really crappy sex–no thanks to feminism!
Why don’t you explain it to us in detail and let us be the judge?
Woodrowfan said,
March 15, 2006 at 18:10
If Lesbian sex is so bad, why are there so many videos in the store with “Lesbian” in the title? er, or so I’m told….
The Dawg said,
March 15, 2006 at 18:26
I would’ve expected much more rational discourse from a site that carries a ‘Tancredo for President’ advertisement.
melior (in Austin) said,
March 15, 2006 at 18:30
I would like to say that it is the feminists who do the faking most the time but I have no actual proof of that. I am pretty sure it’s a fact though.
Why yes, that would be from the famous feminist scholar, Andrew Dice Clay, I believe, in a seminal paper of the field.
Lurker #245691 said,
March 15, 2006 at 18:52
Aw, see what you guys did?
You made that poor woman (nonfeminazi) close comments…YOU’RE ALL MEANIES!
scarshapedstar said,
March 15, 2006 at 19:08
Yeah, I guess my making fun of her lack of dating was kinda over the top.
…And Rightly So!
MCH said,
March 15, 2006 at 19:12
Wow. S,N! didn’t close comments when the Ace-Man showed up.
Right-wingers are such wimps.
scarshapedstar said,
March 15, 2006 at 19:15
Hmm. Her posts contain a link to a “TrackBack URI”.
Does “locator” start with an I?
Sadly, No!
scarshapedstar said,
March 15, 2006 at 19:18
Oh yeah, I think the closing of comments qualifies as a blast of the ol’…
“Ah-oogah!”
scarshapedstar said,
March 15, 2006 at 19:20
Or, rather, “Ah-oogah!”
tigrismus said,
March 15, 2006 at 19:21
‘I’ is for indicator. I love you like a sibling, but you picked the ONE thing in that post that wasn’t completely muffed, so to speak. Maybe the rampant cherry-filled feminsim made you do it?
retro-shiite said,
March 15, 2006 at 19:22
The comment log on that Rightly So post is awesome. She closed the comment page, but too late.
Timmah420 said,
March 15, 2006 at 19:34
As one of the resident techs in the office here, the “my vagina is an apache server” and “using IT right for guys” had me trying to suppress my laughter so hard that I was literally squealing at my desk. People are looking at me weird now…
JiuNoon said,
March 15, 2006 at 19:38
So, S,N! gets invaded by Neo-Nazis and, months later, aRS! closes its comments from an attack over Femi-Nazis. It’s eerie.
tigrismus said,
March 15, 2006 at 19:41
w3.org on URI. It would be incorrect to refer to URIs as URLs, but not incorrect to call URLs URIs, like “dogs are animals” is correct while “animals are dogs” is not.
But why do we argue? Let us eat cake, my brother/sister/sibling of indeterminate gender, and plan the next war on Christmas. Only 284 planning days until this years abomination against liberal atheism.
dAVE said,
March 15, 2006 at 19:45
she closed the comments after only, what 35 comments?
What a giant pussy!
Strange Forces said,
March 15, 2006 at 19:54
{INSERT GIANT PUSSY JOKE HERE}
Timmah420 said,
March 15, 2006 at 19:58
I don’t have a huge vagina, but I swear to god I told my father in law i did…
Captain Slack said,
March 15, 2006 at 20:13
I would’ve expected much more rational discourse from a site that carries a ‘Tancredo for President’ advertisement.
The Dawg 4 teh win!
teh l4m3 said,
March 15, 2006 at 20:19
tee hee. melior said “seminal.”
Doug said,
March 15, 2006 at 20:40
I’m starting to doubt Raven’s moral fiber. Anyone who’d throw around words like “clitoris” and “vagina” and “penis” so carelessly must be a real ho.
Though apparently it’s the feminists’ fault for making it that way.
Anonymous said,
March 15, 2006 at 21:12
I’m disappointed. You guys clearly were only warmed up when she closed comments, and the personal attacks were kept quite civil all things considered. There could have been more, so much more, but now…nothing. It makes me sad to think about the snark that will never be.
celticgirl said,
March 15, 2006 at 21:32
It’s not over until she calls somebody a “f-ing slime twat”…
Now THAT’s So Raven!
Josef said,
March 15, 2006 at 22:13
celticgirl, I liked how you censored yourself on f-ing but not twat.
Demogenes Aristophanes said,
March 15, 2006 at 22:21
Gavin, urethra commenters ought to be ashamed for their crude intercourse with Raven, who clearly has mons important items on her pudenda than being labialled a self-cervixing pussy on a pubic forum.
You people are just ovaryreacting to an intelligent young woman’s vaginal awakening … it’s no wonder her patience was testicled by your pap smears. So circumsising your frankly vulvar foray onto her blog is about the yeast you could have expected from her. Pons my word, I’m surprised she didn’t close the thread foreskin comments into your little attack. G-spot whiz, enough already! Nobody’s going to fallopian for your glans-handed attempts to act all innocent! You must really think Raven is some kind of dim-bulbocavernosus!
celticgirl said,
March 15, 2006 at 22:58
DA, baby you’re on FIRE!
“Joseph”: stop being a FUCKING cobag…
Dorothy said,
March 16, 2006 at 5:35
Celticgirl, when Josef pointed that out, I spent the next few minutes trying to figure out how to censor “twat” and make it readable:
t*at?
t-t?
tw-t?
Nope. I’d not go for “twat” on any of those first off.
Dorothy said,
March 16, 2006 at 5:36
Oh, and my new dicky blog software censors for me, so I got “In certain cir***stances…”
Floored me.
Gavin M. said,
March 16, 2006 at 5:38
tw4t?
Demogenes Aristophanes said,
March 16, 2006 at 6:02
cunt?
Marq said,
March 16, 2006 at 7:02
No, no, no.
Cnut!
Demogenes Aristophanes said,
March 16, 2006 at 8:11
Well, I prefer f14ng3 …
Pinko Punko said,
March 16, 2006 at 10:41
god damn DA. teh better get his ass in gear.
Eleanor said,
March 16, 2006 at 12:28
I feel I’m letting the side down by not providing any snark, but all I can say is: this thread and the one over at evil-twin-blog have made me laugh and laugh. A big collective mwah to all you very funny people.
(Collective mwah? What a slut! Blame feminism!)
Demogenes Aristophanes said,
March 16, 2006 at 17:06
Myyyyyy vagina has a first name
It’s F-E-M-M-I
My vagina has a second name
It’s N-A-Z-I-S
Oh, I love to eat it everyday, and if you ask me why, I’ll say,
“‘Cause Femminazis have a way with V-A-G-I-G-N-A!”
celticgirl said,
March 16, 2006 at 19:25
I meant to type “Josef”, evil twinniness abounds here!
Dorothy, as for your point, right on. I just couldn’t see any way to censor twat, so left it be. I should have just quoted her, which would have given me the easy out. To wit: It’s not over ’til Raven calls you a “…fucking slime-twat”. I can’t seem to remember the offending remark from some months back, but this retort was positively Ravenesque.
That girl is all class, isn’t she?
Timmah420 said,
March 17, 2006 at 4:08
Buttermyself – Yeah, sorry about that, Kender really pissed me off. Does he still post there?
Either way, I’ve been thinking of making a reappearance, the things she says are so unbelieveably nutty and hypocritical that I can hardly resist. Check her quote on the current post of my site, it’s sooooo Raven!
celticgirl said,
March 17, 2006 at 6:14
Alright, I already found ARS! to be deeply disturbing, but I never looked at the header artwork much before now. Is that supposed to be an artfully placed Beretta (or whatever handgun has a squared off barrel) sitting at a jaunty angle in the foreground? Or am I imaging things?
celticgirl said,
March 17, 2006 at 6:16
*grrrrrr* – should read ‘imagining’…
Lucy said,
March 17, 2006 at 20:26
I wonder if anyone is reading this thread anymore: I can’t find the original ARS post our Sadly, No! hosts led us to weeks ago, but can anyone lead me back to it? I want to confirm my impression that it was I whom she called a F-ing Sl— Tw–.
celticgirl said,
March 19, 2006 at 19:40
Lucy, I do believe you are right. I can’t find it either, but I seem to remember it was you in the line of fire.
Marq said,
March 19, 2006 at 21:55
Won’t somebody push this thread over 100? (#97, Bitchez!) Raven? Raven? Bueller?
Marq said,
March 19, 2006 at 22:11
BTW, it was you, Lucy. See this thread: Does every blog have its Bizarro-world doppelganger?