Feb
22
22
Defeat Hillary by Being a Skank
This is the best Conservative t-shirt ad yet:
Indeed, there’s nothing Hillary Clinton fears more than being mauled by a brigade of Republican hookers.
”
Adz Networkz
Hall of Flame
- World O'Crap
- Syndication:
teh l4m3 said,
February 22, 2006 at 16:02
Ha! That’s nothing. I prefer that “Those T-Shirts” ad on Blogads on the conservative sites — the one with the chick who looks like Heidi Fleiss posing in front of rocks at the beach. Now that, folks, is some major camel-toe.
Alek Hidell said,
February 22, 2006 at 16:07
But, damn, you gotta admit this girl is hot. I’m not sure my principles could withstand her wiles. :)
tg said,
February 22, 2006 at 16:26
I’m not sure my principles could withstand her wiles.
A strategically timed “ooooohh, Hillary …” would bring redemption. Though you could probably count breakfast out.
Sadly, No! said,
February 22, 2006 at 16:33
What does it say under “Defeat Hillary”? (Above the belt!)
Dreamweasel said,
February 22, 2006 at 16:39
“For the Common Good”.
David Spector said,
February 22, 2006 at 17:03
I am shocked, shocked, that republicans would dishonor the flag that way! Where’s the outrage?
LOL.
Ginger Yellow said,
February 22, 2006 at 17:07
I thought Republicans didn’t believe in the common good.
norbizness said,
February 22, 2006 at 17:11
Is getting crabs all over flag-shorts considered desecration under the proposed Flag Protection Amendment?
Triffid Farmer said,
February 22, 2006 at 17:20
So a hammer-and-sickle emblem and the phrase “Common Good”? This is a pro-socialist shirt, then?
(Not intentionally, I’m sure. But my intepretation is less muddled than the one they obviously meant.)
Hysterical Woman said,
February 22, 2006 at 17:21
Defeat Hillary-Vote Communist in the next election! (Shouldn’t they have a cross-out sign or something so people know that Hillary suppose to be the commie, not them?)
J. A. Baker said,
February 22, 2006 at 17:21
A strategically timed “ooooohh, Hillary …” would bring redemption. Though you could probably count breakfast out.
But what if her name really IS Hillary? :-P
Lucy said,
February 22, 2006 at 17:42
If here name really were Hillary, she would have changed it, or been forced to change it, by now.
mrgumby2u said,
February 22, 2006 at 17:43
Well then she would be Hillary Skank.
Adorable Girlfriend said,
February 22, 2006 at 18:11
Republican hookers? My mind cannot stop laughing.
Teh, teh…we’ve discussed women are not ‘chicks’ or various other barnyard animals.
mikey said,
February 22, 2006 at 18:30
Hell, there’s nothing I fear more than being mauled by a brigade of republican hookers. Umm, I think I fear it. Y’know, I should face my fear. Stand right up to it, if you know what I mean. So to all you platoons and brigades of republican hookers I say BRING IT ON!!!
mikey
Triffid Farmer said,
February 22, 2006 at 18:30
Gotta love her expression, though.
“Tee hee, powerful women are STUPID!”
Gah.
tigrismus said,
February 22, 2006 at 18:45
I wonder in which Asian and/or third-world country the sweatshops that make those shirts and shorts are located?
JiuNoon said,
February 22, 2006 at 19:01
I’m just shocked that any Repub would wear the hammer and sickel without a big Ghostbusters NO symbol around it. I mean, they aren’t known for understanding subtlety – as evidenced by the rest of the shirt…
Emily said,
February 22, 2006 at 19:27
On usflag.org, I learned that the US Code, Title 36, Chapter 10 tells us of the patriotic customs associated with Old Glory. Under the section “Respect for the Flag”, we learn that “The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery.” And yet this model is wearing hot pants made from a flag. Go figure.
Strange Forces said,
February 22, 2006 at 19:32
So long as she doesn’t set her pants on fire like some stinking hippie liberal atheist activist scum, I’m sure the rightwingers will be fine with it.
Jay Brida said,
February 22, 2006 at 19:51
Hysterical Woman nailed the message: Defeat Hillary vote Communist.
Hammer and suckle indeed!
The Dawg said,
February 22, 2006 at 19:53
Ummm, good thing it’s the liberals and not the cons who continue to pollute our culture with sexually suggestive pictures, movies, music and videos.
Are these the same folks who are always whining about Britney Spears and scanty attire?
King Spirula said,
February 22, 2006 at 19:56
So I’m unpatriotic if I burn the flag but it’s patriotic to leave skid marks on it. Cool.
Zoidberg said,
February 22, 2006 at 20:04
That model is alright, but I don’t know if she’s Dahonger material.
(Wooo! Way back Sadly No reference!)
Malatesta said,
February 22, 2006 at 20:13
“That model is alright, but I don’t know if she’s Dahonger material.”
Throw a flag on her and do her for your country!
ps What are those lumps under her shirt?
mmeetoilenoir said,
February 22, 2006 at 20:35
She looks like a broke-ass college student with no bubbies. Is that the best the Rethugs can do?
Remember the Dem calendar that came out durnig the elections, and the Rethug calendar that came out soon after? Ugh!
It’s true: us liberal women are hot…they’re really NOT.
JiuNoon said,
February 22, 2006 at 20:59
Hey, don’t go criticizing the model. Don’t forget that Repub women are just there for procreation. If she had big boobs, you wouldn’t be able to read the talking point. That’s why Coulter is the ideal Repub woman – all talking points, no sex appeal.
There’s a scary thought. Ann Coulter modelling conservative t-shirts in American flag daisy dukes. What evil have I wrought?
thedarkbackward said,
February 22, 2006 at 21:05
Hmmmm…
Looks to me like she’s got a Hollywood Loaf there.
I’d bet the farm that she has at least one scrotum in those Captain America hotpants.
moonbiter said,
February 22, 2006 at 21:08
I’d hit it.
ortho_bob said,
February 22, 2006 at 22:52
At least one scrotum? Are you suggesting she collects them? This game has taken a very unpleasant twist.
Gavin M. said,
February 22, 2006 at 22:59
I’d hit it.
Ew…
J. A. Baker said,
February 22, 2006 at 23:14
At least one scrotum? Are you suggesting she collects them? This game has taken a very unpleasant twist.
Funny. I took that to mean that you’d be having sloppy seconds if you tapped her.
D. Sidhe said,
February 23, 2006 at 0:24
Hookers would never wear such a controversial t-shirt. It alienates the prospective clients.
thedarkbackward said,
February 23, 2006 at 0:59
I was suggesting that there is quite the rounded nut-bulge going on down there. I’m not ruling out multiple scrotums.
Timmah420 said,
February 23, 2006 at 2:36
Looks to me like she’s got a Hollywood Loaf there.
Goddamit you beat me to the “hey it looks like “she’s” got sack” comment.
It might just be because I live in Canada, but I simply can’t fathom anyone wanting to wear that save for fat, white, repub limbaugh types…
Marq said,
February 23, 2006 at 12:53
Republican hookersâ„¢–they’ll have sex with you… but they won’t enjoy it.
ali said,
February 23, 2006 at 14:39
my name ali my love u
sexual harrassment panda said,
February 24, 2006 at 17:27
She does look a little, um, masculine, now that you mention it . . .
actor212 said,
February 24, 2006 at 21:25
Indeed, there’s nothing Hillary Clinton fears more than being mauled by a brigade of Republican hookers.
All one of them?
Say, what IS Katherine Harris doing these days?
Honey said,
February 25, 2006 at 5:42
Where the hell did they find a hot chick willing to wear that?
Jessicas said,
March 7, 2006 at 11:32
Great web-site,admin! Very informativity! antique furniture
Karen said,
March 14, 2006 at 17:34
Nice and informative site….good work!
Nerzin said,
March 19, 2006 at 14:01
Keep a good work man!
Halo said,
March 20, 2006 at 11:34
It is healthy, I shall come on your site more often, thank.
Dawn said,
April 6, 2006 at 5:01
Great work!
http://eoviczsv.com/wemi/rudm.html | http://qkjsdleo.com/jdyk/obpr.html
Haree said,
April 19, 2006 at 3:40
Los Angeles Movers
Junior said,
May 7, 2006 at 0:22
New York Personal Injury Lawyer
Heel said,
May 12, 2006 at 17:30
Hot Naked Girls
Arnie said,
May 24, 2006 at 20:09
Debt Help
Mike Poznoski said,
November 26, 2007 at 21:04
I think that Hillary would jump this chick, first chance she got. She’d probably have Sharon Stone hold her down to boot.
bureaubasher said,
November 29, 2007 at 19:33
Whoa, Mike, back on ;your meds. I know all you RWN’s were getting stiffies in anticipation of another opportunity to do some of your patented witless Hillary bashing at last night’s YouTube debate, but can you find it within yourself at least pretend not to be a quite so much of a moron?