Jul
1

Rooting for injuries




Posted at 15:39 by Brad
“How dare you insult my young apprentice!”

Like John, I’m rather enjoying the public spat going on between Steve Schmidt and Emperor Palpatine Bill Kristol. Here’s the good stuff:

William Kristol, the editor of The Weekly Standard and at times an informal adviser to Sen. John McCain, touched off the latest back-and-forth Tuesday morning with a post on his magazine’s blog criticizing the Todd Purdum-authored Palin story and pointing a finger at Steve Schmidt, McCain’s campaign manager.

Kristol cited a passage in Purdum’s piece in which “some top aides” were said to worry about the Alaska governor’s “mental state” and the prospect that the Alaska governor may be suffering from post-partum depression following the birth of her son Trig. “In fact, one aide who raised this possibility in the course of trashing Palin’s mental state to others in the McCain-Palin campaign was Steve Schmidt,” Kristol wrote.

Asked about the accusation, Schmidt fired back in an e-mail: “I’m sure John McCain would be president today if only Bill Kristol had been in charge of the campaign.”

“After all, his management of [former Vice President] Dan Quayle’s public image as his chief of staff is still something that takes your breath away,” Schmidt continued.

It’s tough to know whom to root for in this fight, but if I had to choose, I gotta say I sympathize with Schmidt. Oh sure, he’s a sleazy GOP political operative who’s clearly trying to cover his ass for his own failings. But at the same time, Schmidt has actually had to, you know, do stuff in his career. He help Ah-nold get reelected in California. He was apparently the Bushies’ point man for getting Alito and Roberts confirmed. Of course, these aren’t admirable achievements, but they are achievements.

Meanwhile, what the hell has Bill Kristol ever done? Mostly he’s sat on his ass in the Weekly Standard office and advocated invading other countries. Christ, he even backed sending America’s armed forces to take down the damned Somali pirates — as though the Army doesn’t have enough wars to fight already.

The bottom line is this: imagine you’re Steve Schmidt. Imagine that you’ve worked your ass off to make John McCain into a semi-legitimate candidate for the presidency. And then imagine that this twerp from the Weekly Standard comes along and convinces McCain to pick as his running mate a crazy, narcissistic wingnut who is well known for stabbing her allies in the back and whose sole qualification for the vice presidency has been eating a moose. How the hell would you feel?

126 Comments »

  1. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 15:45

    Meanwhile, what the hell has Bill Kristol ever done?

    Built two Death Stars, had three Sith Lords killed, converted The Convergence to the Dark Side, destroyed a Republic and turned it into an empire….Get off his back, willya????? The guy only has two hands!

  2. J Edgar said,

    July 1, 2009 at 15:54

    So, Steve Schmidt didn’t notice that John McCain would say or do ANYTHING at anytime, and possibly reverse himself the next minute or next day. Or he just didn’t care? Which feeling is it?

  3. Fleas correct the era said,

    July 1, 2009 at 15:55

    It’s the didn’t care one. He’s a Republican.

  4. St. Trotsky, Pope-in-Avignon said,

    July 1, 2009 at 15:56

    Why do I have the feeling choosing between these two is comparable to the expression “not knowing whether to shit or go blind”?

  5. Ted the Slacker said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:02

    “It’s tough to know whom to root for in this fight”

    Well, given Kristol’s awesome record of GOPFAIL, I’d have to root for him.

  6. forked tongue said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:05

    Yes! We want Kristol to emerge stronger from this fight, with more political capital and leadership status!

  7. Pere Ubu said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:05

    Access my loach, tribs!

    “some top aides” were said to worry about the Alaska governor’s “mental state”

    Wheee, so that would make two American governors who are certifiable. At least.

  8. Ah yes, the prattle said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:16

    I was going to root for Kristol to take down Schmidt on the chance that Schmidt may have learned something from the failed McCain candidacy that would make him more effective managing future campaigns but then I had a vision of him as the GOP’s answer to Bob Shrum. Now I have to root for him to work for every Republican presidential candidate for the next 20 years or so.

  9. Ted the Slacker said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:19

    One other thing – “imagine you’re Steve Schmidt”

    Okay I tried.

    Doesn’t much matter whether it’s Steve Schmidt, Steve-O or Steve the Pirate, the idea of Bill Kristol pointing an accusatory finger in your direction for talking to journalists is like having Doughy go apeshit on someone for having an oedipus complex.

  10. D.N. Nation said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:19

    I find Bloody Bill much more tolerable now that he has zero influence over anyone relevant. Keep grinnin’, Billy.

  11. D.N. Nation said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:24

    To be fair to Kwazy Kristol, though…

    Asked about the accusation, Schmidt fired back in an e-mail: “I’m sure John McCain would be president today if only Bill Kristol had been in charge of the campaign.”

    Actually, dude, you pretty much did run the campaign like Kristol would have. That is to say…perpetual pronouncement of victory was Job #1. Every single drooling sub-moronic stunt Camp McCain pulled- from Notjoe the Notplumber to AyersAyersAyers to the Britney ad to the campaign suspension was done for the sake of declaring to any schmuck who’d listen that each stunt would finally drive that last nail into the Obama campaign’s coffin. I can’t see how Bill da Butcher would have done any worse.

  12. Righteous Bubba said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:28

    It’s the collateral damage I’m enjoying. It all turns around how obviously terrible Sarah Palin is.

    Let us note her place in the minds of voters as of June 10th:

    Most pundits and political observers already have a list of possible candidates who could end up battling for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination — including (in addition to Gingrich) Sarah Palin, Romney, Mike Huckabee, Charlie Crist, and Jeb Bush. Gingrich is the only one on this list who is mentioned by more than 2% of Republicans as the person who — at this point in time — speaks for their party.

    Her under-two-percentness is not for lack of hearts to win: the top three vote-getters who speak for the Republican party are Other, No one, and No opinion.

  13. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:28

    You know, Palin is still one of the most popilar Governors in the country. You can almost taste the fear coming from the lib bastions of Hollywood and Manhattan over the prospect of a Palin nomination.

  14. kg said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:36

    I think “taste the fear” is the new “scuse mah fingars”

  15. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:36

    You can almost taste the fear coming from the lib bastions of Hollywood and Manhattan over the prospect of a Palin nomination.

    You mistake “drooling with anticipation” for fear, sir.

  16. LittlePig said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:36

    Goodness gracious yes! We are trembling in our fear that the charming and erudite Ms. Palin will dominate the 2012 election. Please, oh, please, don’t throw us in dat briar pa..er, um, don’t nominate Ms. Palin!

  17. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:37

    I think “taste the fear” is the new “scuse mah fingars”

    It’s the new Republican candy, Scuttles. “Taste The Fear!”

    They’re like Skittles (“Taste the rainbow!”) only deliberately macho and manly.

  18. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:37

    And why should we listen to Schmidt? That morom couldn’t even manage to keep Indiana red. Fuck him.

  19. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:39

    And Actor, get out of the Upper East Side and step out into the real world once in a while.

  20. Pere Ubu said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:40

    taste the fear

    Sounds like Spinal Tap’s chartbreaking followup to “Smell The Glove”.

    And I’d assert the GOP candy would be called “Shittles”. “Shittles – ‘Cause You’re Eating It Anyway”

  21. owlbear1 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:43

    Obviously, the only honorable and masculine way Schmidt and Kristol can end this argument is with hand grenades at five paces.

    Anything less means they are spineless cowards and liars.

  22. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:44

    Who do you really think the American people will vote for in 2012 when the economy still hasn’t recovered, the deficit is spiraling out of control, and inflation and taxes are on the rise?

    Sure as shit they won’t vote for Hopey McChange again.

    I can’t fucking wait for 2010 and 2012!

  23. The Red Badger of Courage said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:46

    This bears repeating:

    So, Troofy has been here what, like a year, or something? Is that some kind of record for mentally incapacitated trolls?

    Longer than a year on Sadly No!, and although he changes his nyms every few weeks or so to try and avoid detection, the same old mannerisms give him away time and time again.

    And if it’s the same obsessive I think it is, he’s been trolling liberal blogs for about 8 years now, as someone who used to post almost exactly like him could be found on Eschaton in 2001/2.

    One day, perhaps, he’ll come to realize that the only meaning his life has, the attempt to hurt liberals, is a complete wash out as there’s just nothing to do but laugh at someone who in one thread alone gets the lowest presidential approval ratings ever off by 35% (GWB final approval rating: 22%); And who can’t count the number of months since November; And who insists that he knows what you think better than you do; you did declare Obama a messiah, you did, you did, you DID!

    Yes, how sad and wasted is your life when you are compelled to go online again and again and again, trying to upset people because you don’t know, and never will know what love is, and all they do is laugh at you making a complete tit of yourself?

  24. Mr. POOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:47

    Redress my arse, libs!

  25. owlbear1 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:47

    I can’t fucking wait for 2010 and 2012!

    Why? It’s not like reality can even fucking make a dent…

  26. Fencedude said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:47

    This has got to be a spoof troll, right?

  27. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:48

    And Actor, get out of the Upper East Side and step out into the real world once in a while.

    I think I need a boatload of meth to do that, Troofie.

    Can I have some of yours, please?

  28. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:52

    If you want to see the end results of liberalism, look at New York City and California. Both bankrupt shit holes that are losing population due to their high taxes, high spending, political corruption, crime, and nanny satate laws.

    While NY and CA have huge budget deficitsn guess what state has a budget SURPLUS, even in a recession? Texas. And its population is growing. Because of successful conservative principles.

    Compare it to shithole Michigan, California, or New York.

  29. The Victims of 9/11 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:54

    Why does the troll hate us so much?

  30. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:57

    Both bankrupt shit holes that are losing population due to their high taxes, high spending, political corruption, crime, and nanny satate laws.

    *AHEM*

  31. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:57

    Hell look at Detroit. Very few evil white male Republicans left there. Should be a paradise, right libs? Instead its a Third World country.

  32. Gov. Rick Perry said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:57

    My conservative principles are what lead me to petition for record levels of federal aid.

  33. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 16:58

    I wonder how much of that Texas increase is refugees from Katrina who had to stay?

  34. The Kid from Kounty Meath said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:00

    Oh, sweet Jesus. Twoofie’s gonna start in on Zimbabwe in a minute, and then claim we’re projecting if we call him a racist. You will wonder how the hell I was able to figure this out, unless you’ve spent more than ten minutes here before.

  35. Mr. POOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:00

    If you want to see the end results of conservatism, look at Arkansas, Missisippi, or Saudi Arabia.

  36. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:00

    Texas was growing at a record rate long before Katrina.

    The growing states in the electoral college–the ones that will get more EVs and more Congressmen, are REPUBLICAN states.

  37. The Troll's Penis said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:00

    Why does the troll hate me so much?

  38. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:01

    [gets punched] Give up? [gets punched, spits out tooth] Give up?

  39. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:02

    I wonder how much of that Texas increase is illegal Messicans engaged in identity theft?

  40. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:02

    Georgia is another growing state with refugees from shithole New Jersey and Mass.

    In 2012, it will have more EVs than New Jersey or Michigan, and South Carolina will have more than Connecticut.

  41. The Red Badger of Courage said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:04

    While NY and CA have huge budget deficitsn guess what state has a budget SURPLUS, even in a recession? Texas. And its population is growing. Because of successful conservative principles.

    Funny, I thought it was from teh Mexislamohomofascists coming over the Rio Grande to take our jerrrbs.

  42. tigrismus said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:04

    Palin is still one of the most popilar Governors in the country

    Popilar? She has the most explosive hair?

  43. How to Be a True American Patriot said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:05

    -Condemn about 60% of your countrymen as insufficiently American because of their regional origins, and gloat at the prospect of them failing.
    -Bookmark it, libs.
    -Repeat

  44. El Cid said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:05

    How the hell would you feel?

    STARBURSTS!!!

    That’s what Kristol Jr. felt when he was on the National Review Alaska fundraising cruise and he met Palin and he knew the GOP had met its one true love leader for the future.

  45. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:06

    Explain to me why Californians are fleeing their state for Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado if liberalism works. Explain Detroit, too.

  46. El Cid said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:07

    Oh, all Southerners aren’t failing — just the idiot, backwards, right wing conservative Dixie Confederate-addled fucktards who grew even fatter, stupider, and lazier after dominating national politics for the last 40 years. Good riddance to the unhealthy authority held by so many of my undeserving Southern neighbors.

  47. The Kid from Kounty Meath said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:08

    Nope, you still owe us an explanation of why we didn’t wake up to the McCain presidency.

  48. Georgia said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:08

    Georgia is another growing state with refugees from shithole New Jersey and Mass.

    Hi, Twoofie. Looks like you know something about me.

    Something you don’t know: the GOP brand here is el toasto in 2010/2012. Apparently you can’t campaign entirely on “Atlanta SUX!” and expect to run the state forever.

  49. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:10

    McCain lost because he voted for the bailout, and because the MSM was in the tank for Obama. ACORN busing homeless people in from Chicago and Kentucky to vote in Indiana and Black Panthers intimmidating people at to polls in PA didn’t help, either.

  50. jim said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:10

    As a rule I eschew violence, but in this case I think I’d be pretty happy to hand out the 2X4s for however long it takes one of them to work their way through the other’s lead-filled skull.

    You can almost taste the fear

    Mmm, num num num … yummy yummy fear … kinda like butterscotch, actually.

    I didn’t notice any flavor coming from the extremely fearsome link in my previous comment here but I’m pretty sure that scratch-&-sniff cards would only add to the fun-factor.

    But I practice what I preach when it comes to tolerance of others’ cultures – if the GOP decides it really wants to nominate The Whore Of Babylon, for POTUS then I say what the heck, let ‘em – after all, it’d STILL be an improvement on that grinning human boil made of non sequiturs & epic fail they got “elected” last time.

  51. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:10

    STARBURSTS!!!

    That’s what Kristol Jr. felt when he was on the National Review

    It was Rich Lowry and it was when she winked during the debate.

    Bookmark it!

  52. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:11

    I called people who disagreed with the Florida 2000 outcome “Sore Loserman”.
    Also, I claim to be for personal responsibility, but all my problems are the fault of darkies with clipboards.

  53. The Red Badger of Courage said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:12

    Explain Detroit, too.

    Well…

    The city name comes from the Detroit River (French: le détroit du Lac Érie), meaning the strait of Lake Erie, linking Lake Huron and Lake Erie; in the historical context, the strait included Lake St. Clair and the St. Clair River.[17] Traveling up the Detroit River on the ship Le Griffon (owned by La Salle), Father Louis Hennepin noted the north bank of the river as an ideal location for a settlement. There, in 1701, the French officer Antoine de la Mothe Cadillac, along with fifty-one additional French-Canadians, founded a settlement called Fort Ponchartrain du Détroit, naming it after the comte de Pontchartrain, Minister of Marine under Louis XIV. France offered free land to attract families to Detroit, which grew to 800 people in 1765, the largest city between Montreal and New Orleans. Francois Marie Picoté, sieur de Belestre (Montreal 1719–1793) was the last French military commander at Fort Detroit (1758–1760), surrendering the fort on November 29, 1760 to the British. The region’s fur trade was an important economic activity. Detroit’s city flag reflects this French heritage.

    (strongly resisting urge to scroll-troll Troofie)

  54. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:12

    Also, Obama outspent McCain by a large margin by going back (lying) on his promise of public financing and illegally raising cash from overseas by disabling the address verification system on his website donation form.

  55. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:13

    WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH! The Party of Personal Responsibility demands its bah-bah!

  56. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:14

    There was more to the Rev. Wright story, too, but the MSM didn’t investigate it. Read Steve Sailer’s expose on Wright.

  57. The Red Badger of Courage said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:16

    The butthurt is strong with this one

  58. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:16

    Read what a white supremacist thinks of a man in a dashiki! You’ll never guess!

  59. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:19

    I love that some libs are so immature they would rather spoof my nome de plime than respond to my points.

    Why don’t you go watch “jackass”, cartoons, or play video games with other immature children and leave political debate to the adults?

  60. "The Adults" said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:19

    We have jobs.

  61. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:20

    Poor Troofie. He’s become a parody of himself…

  62. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:20

    If by “jobs” you mean government work or welfare.

  63. Adolf Hitler said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:21

    There was more to the Rabbi story, too, but the MSM didn’t investigate it. Read my expose on Rabbis.

  64. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:22

    Altho, to be honest, we should have figured Troofus would show up here. After all, Al Franken won the Senate yesterday for the Democratic Party. He has to scream at someone and his mom demands he use his indoor voice while she’s in bed with the biker gang from down the block with a headache.

  65. The Kid from Kounty Meath said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:22

    “If by ‘jobs’ you mean government work or welfare.”
    So what’s your excuse?

  66. Mr. POOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:23

    nome de plime

    Paging Smut Clyde, Smut Clyde, English cleanup in aisle 8. Please bring the Puntastic with you…

  67. St. Xecky Gilchrist said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:23

    You have to admit troofie was right about one thing.

    He has an inexhaustible supply of different IP addresses.

  68. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:23

    I loev the money quote from one of McCain’s aides re: Palin

    “She’s the Little Shop of Horrors”

    Would that make her “Audrey, Jr. Jr”?

  69. "Political debate" as defined by Troofie said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:24

    “Fuck with the bull and you WILL get the motherfucking horns.”
    “Tintin is a faggot”
    “You will wake up to the McCain presidency and the Great Liberal Freakout will be on.”

  70. The Red Badger of Courage said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:25

    Mr. Troof-OP 17:19

    I love that some libs are so immature they would rather spoof my nome de plime than respond to my points.

    Why don’t you go watch “jackass”, cartoons, or play video games with other immature children and leave political debate to the adults?

    Mr. Troof-OP 17:20

    If by “jobs” you mean government work or welfare.

    An adult wrote that, ladies and gentlemen
    (and misspelled “plume”, btw)

  71. The Kid from Kounty Meath said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:26

    “Would that make her ‘Audrey, Jr. Jr’?”
    And Trip is Audrey Jr. Jr. Jr. Jr.

  72. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:27

    Typical libs. Spoof me, and then claim I really said it.

    I was wrong about the election only because I underestimated the combined stupidity and racial guilt of the American people, bult up over the years by a failed public school system and biased MSM.

  73. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:28

    I was wrong about the election only because I underestimated the combined stupidity and racial guilt of the American people, bult up over the years by a failed public school system and biased MSM.

    I’m glad we agree it was Reagan’s fault.

  74. Troofie said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:28

    Only fags would harp on a minor mistake like a typo!
    Unless Obama misspoke, which further establishes him as Satanic Black Hitler to the Max.

  75. The Red Badger of Courage said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:29

    I was wrong about the election

    Really? You seemed so sure of yourself when you said:

    Here is how it will go down next week. First, the results from Virginia and North Carolina will come in, and they’ll be declared for McCain. You’ll be disappointed, but “no big deal, change can’t come overnight” will be your comment. Florida will go red, and a little nervousness will creep in. The usual suspects will fall into the usual categories. As the night drags on, Ohio, Colorado, and (much to your horror) Pennsylvania will be too close to call.

    My advice at this point to you will be to go to bed. You will wake up to a McCain presidency and the Great Liberal Freakout will be on.

    Bookmark this, liberals, as this is exactly how it is going to go down. You will be wonder how the hell I was able to call this.

  76. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:30

    Againan I underestimated the stupidity of the voting public.

    They had clear heads in 2000-2004, but the MSM successfully brainwashed them this time through a racial guilt trip. McCain would have won if he had run against a white guy.

  77. The Kid from Kounty Meath said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:30

    I call fake Troofie. Our boy would never concede the remotest possibility of being wrong in any way, shape or form.

  78. St. Xecky Gilchrist said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:31

    I was wrong about the election…

    Clearly a fake troofie. The phrase “I was wrong” is unutterable by a wingnut.

  79. St. Xecky Gilchrist said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:32

    - sorry about that, Kid.

  80. The Kid from Kounty Meath said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:32

    “They had clear heads in 2000-2004″
    It takes a clear head to vote for the guy who scares you the most about the impending Ayrabistani Takeover and Shanialawcommunofascism Also.

  81. The Red Badger of Courage said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:34

    McCain would have won if he had run against a white guy.

    Yeah, look how successful he was in the Republican primary; that was FULL of white guys!

  82. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:34

    Againan I underestimated the stupidity of the voting public.

    Really? Because you really seemed to factor that in when you said this:

    Here is how it will go down next week. First, the results from Virginia and North Carolina will come in, and they’ll be declared for McCain. You’ll be disappointed, but “no big deal, change can’t come overnight” will be your comment. Florida will go red, and a little nervousness will creep in. The usual suspects will fall into the usual categories. As the night drags on, Ohio, Colorado, and (much to your horror) Pennsylvania will be too close to call.

    My advice at this point to you will be to go to bed. You will wake up to a McCain presidency and the Great Liberal Freakout will be on.

    Bookmark this, liberals, as this is exactly how it is going to go down. You will be wonder how the hell I was able to call this.

  83. Troofie's Mouth said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:35

    I’m FULL of white guys!

  84. The Red Badger of Courage said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:36

    Mr. Troofie, I need you to fill out one of these, if you’ll just have a seat over there. Thanks!

  85. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:39

    “Butthurt”?

    Shouldn’t you be playing Nintendo and watching cartoons with the other children, Badger?

  86. St. Trotsky, Pope-in-Avignon said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:40

    Yeah, look how successful he was in the Republican primary; that was FULL of white guys!

    Didn’t he win because every other asshole had to drop out because they either had no money, no platform, no scruples, or was a Mormon from Massachusetts?

    Yes, victory by default, what a mandate to further winning.

  87. The Red Badger of Courage said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:40

    Hmmm, awfully quiet all of a sudden. This must mean:

    a) Everyone’s moving over to the new thread, oooooooooor

    b) Troofie is switching to scroll-troll mode.

  88. The Red Badger of Courage said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:43

    Didn’t he win because every other asshole had to drop out because they either had no money, no platform, no scruples, or was a Mormon from Massachusetts?

    Yep. Just further proof that “you win (the primary) with the candidate you have, not with the candidates you wish you had.”

  89. Pere Ubu said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:43

    Yeah, the GOP is just full of adults.

    Like the OK congress, which is considering a bill to blame the recession on America’s moral decay and advocate a return to proper theocratic gummint. And Mark “Sex At Taxpayer’s Expense” Sanford. Also.

  90. The Kid from Kounty Meath said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:44

    ” If by ‘jobs’ you mean government work or welfare”?
    Shouldn’t you be playing Nintendo and watching cartoons with the other children, Twoofie?
    Hey, ‘member a while back when even the word “troll” was sending Double-Truth, Ruth into a frenzy of I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I self-righteousness? That was hilarious.

  91. St. Xecky Gilchrist said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:45

    Troofie is switching to scroll-troll mode.

    I’m eagerly awaiting troLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL mode.

  92. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:45

    Pere, I don’t want to make you look anymore stupid than you already are, but it is called a “state legislature” not a “congress”.

    Perhaps before commenting next time you could at least learn the proper name of the institution.

  93. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:45

    And Mark “Sex At Taxpayer’s Expense” Sanford. Also.

    Now now, he only admits to sex with one woman. And he’s trying to fall in love with his (heiress) wife all over again…

  94. Xecky Gilchrist said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:46

    Yes, victory by default, what a mandate to further winning.

    To be fair, victory-by-entitlement worked for Bush twice.

  95. The Kid from Kounty Meath said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:46

    “…I don’t want to make you look anymore [sic] stupid than you already are, ”
    And curtain.

  96. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:47

    Perhaps before commenting next time you could at least learn the proper name of the institution

    And use a better nom de plime, Pere! *snark*

  97. Ted the Slacker said,

    July 1, 2009 at 18:07

    use a better nom de plime

    Or even a nome de plime.

    Anyway, it’s now wandered next-door. More whack-a-troll to ensue…

  98. St. Trotsky, Pope-in-Avignon said,

    July 1, 2009 at 18:07

    I prefer a nom de om nom.

  99. Pere Ubu said,

    July 1, 2009 at 18:12

    At least I’m not blaming my money problems on TEH GHEY like the oh-so-adult Okie STATE LEGISLATURE is doing. Party of personal responsibility my ass.

    Besides, I’m sure Twoofy is one of these jackasses who does the “IT’S A REPUBLIC NOT A DEMOCRACY” comedy routine.

    Speaking of which – you guys see Michelle Batshit Bachmann is evidently going to be on Alex Jones’ show this week? Clash of the Titans!

  100. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 18:14

    Didn’t Bachmann urge her constituents to ignore the 2010 census, thus almost assuring her seat will be taken away under the apportionment thereafter?

  101. St. Trotsky, Pope-in-Avignon said,

    July 1, 2009 at 18:19

    Well, in the post-apocalyptic wasteland she’s certain is arriving any day now, she’ll be Queenie-for-Eternity, so these minor details about a census is but a trifling impingement on her fantasies of wearing a crown and bossing around underlings into physical infirmity, the mental already long infirm.

    Honestly, not really long-term thinkers we’re dealing with here.

  102. Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 18:26

    She told her constituents to only put down the number of people in their household and their addressan since that is the only thing the Constitution authorizes the Census to do. Any other questions are unconstitutional and an invasion of privacy.

  103. Pere Ubu said,

    July 1, 2009 at 18:30

    Any other questions are unconstitutional and an invasion of privacy.

    said the guy who defends warrantless wiretaps and government surveillance.

  104. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 18:31

    Any other questions are unconstitutional and an invasion of privacy.

    Correct. Because she’s afraid she’ll be rounded up and imprisoned with the other Japanese in an internment camp….ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!

  105. Michelle Bachmann said,

    July 1, 2009 at 18:33

    I suddenly deeply care about the privacy rights of people and what it says in the Constitution.

    Also, fuck habeas corpus.

  106. slip said,

    July 1, 2009 at 18:37

    Any other questions are unconstitutional and an invasion of privacy.

    sadly, no.

    The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.

  107. Pere Ubu said,

    July 1, 2009 at 18:39

    The mere fact that Bachmann would be seen/heard in conjunction with a fuckstick like Alex Jones just pretty well says it all.

    Oh, and she’s the one who predicted (as I recall) $4 a gallon gas if Obama got elected. Considering I just filled up for $2.39 per yesterday, her accuracy astounds.

  108. lobbey said,

    July 1, 2009 at 19:10

    Read Steve Sailer’s expose on Wright.

    well, that me convinced…

  109. Parody Troll said,

    July 1, 2009 at 19:11

    Spending a year lurking anonymously on an Internet message board and insulting strangers is clearly the “adult” way to address important issues.

  110. arakasi said,

    July 1, 2009 at 19:29

    Mr. GOP said,

    July 1, 2009 at 17:20

    If by “jobs” you mean government work or welfare.

    Troofie, why do you hate our troops?

  111. The Goddamn Batman Could Wind Up "Mr. GOP" All Day, Just Like A Pair Of Chattery Teeth said,

    July 1, 2009 at 20:01

    It’s fun to watch Twewfie sputter old wingnut bullshit in response to the scorn justly heaped on his original assertion, that people are actually scared of a Palin presidential run instead of it being the best-case scenario for Democrats. He’s like our own personal Shut Up, Little Man!

  112. Honus said,

    July 1, 2009 at 20:20

    Is this the same (putative adult) troll that has the hot stripper wife and talks to high-ranking career CIA guys at his barbecues?

  113. The Dark Avenger said,

    July 1, 2009 at 20:41

    April

    Hey libs, ready to lose tonight in NY-20?

    The Great Republican Comeback of 2009-2012 starts tonight. You can take that one to the BANK, baby!

    Troofie, or someone remarkably like him, likes to go into supervillain mode sometimes:

    Ready to lose in NY-20 tonight?

    HAHA!

    Obama is already a failure. The Democrat Party can’t even win in NY!!!!

    So much for the “stimulus” aka “porkulus” package. Looks like the Republicans were right to vote against it now that the Democrat in NY-20 is going down to likely defeat!

    LOSERS!

    Where’s your Obamamessiah NOW!? HAHA!

    Posted by: Hey LIBS!

    When will the Republicans start coming back, Troofie?

    Are you going to keep moving the goalposts, Troofie?

    Bookmark, this, GOP!

  114. Cap'n Fatback said,

    July 1, 2009 at 20:49

    And why should we listen to Schmidt? That morom couldn’t even manage to keep Indiana red. Fuck him.

    “Morom”: the new “moran”!

  115. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 21:05

    Is this the same (putative adult) troll that has the hot stripper wife and talks to high-ranking career CIA guys at his barbecues?

    That was The Fool.

    I can see how you could mix them up.

  116. St. Trotsky, Pope-in-Avignon said,

    July 1, 2009 at 21:21

    What with the being the same and all.

  117. Xecky Gilchrist said,

    July 1, 2009 at 21:32

    It’s fun to watch Twewfie sputter old wingnut bullshit in response to the scorn justly heaped on his original assertion, that people are actually scared of a Palin presidential run instead of it being the best-case scenario for Democrats.

    I am actually scared of a Palin presidential run – if she’s anywhere on the ticket, there is a possibility she’ll actually win. It might take major electoral shenanigans, or the U.S. public might just be stupid enough to do it for real. Better safe, I say.

  118. St. Trotsky, Pope-in-Avignon said,

    July 1, 2009 at 22:12

    Being scared of a Palin presidential run is somewhere between ’shark attack’ and ‘lightning strike’ as far as plausibility goes.

    And being from Florida, I’ve got much better odds on the first two.

  119. Xecky Gilchrist said,

    July 1, 2009 at 22:24

    Being scared of a Palin presidential run is somewhere between ’shark attack’ and ‘lightning strike’ as far as plausibility goes.

    True enough, but I don’t go stand under tall trees during rainstorms. Here in the desert I’m relatively safe from shark attacks.

  120. Batocchio said,

    July 1, 2009 at 22:50

    Home run, Brad. I also love Schmidt’s line on Quayle.

  121. Rusty Shackleford said,

    July 1, 2009 at 22:56

    Here in the desert I’m relatively safe from shark attacks.

    Or so one would think.

  122. St. Trotsky, Pope-in-Avignon said,

    July 1, 2009 at 23:01

    Or so one would think.

    Candygram.

  123. An obscure NZ band said,

    July 1, 2009 at 23:06

    Shark attack!

  124. actor212 said,

    July 1, 2009 at 23:10

    Indeed. So one would think

  125. Big Bad Bald Bastard said,

    July 2, 2009 at 0:42

    nanny satate laws.

    What Tw00fiee (extra E) doesn’t realize is that NY actually has nanny satiate laws. Should a liberal libertine decide to have hawt sexxx with a nanny, it is illegal not to satisfy her. Of course, he would be against such a law, being completely unable to please (or even locate) a lover.

  126. Northern Observer said,

    July 3, 2009 at 22:34

    The bottom line is this: imagine you’re Steve Schmidt. Imagine that you’ve worked your ass off to make John McCain into a semi-legitimate candidate for the presidency. And then imagine that this twerp from the Weekly Standard comes along and convinces McCain to pick as his running mate a crazy, narcissistic wingnut who is well known for stabbing her allies in the back and whose sole qualification for the vice presidency has been eating a moose. How the hell would you feel?

    You know when you put it that way it’s a bit of a wonder that Schmitt hasn’t become a proud member of the Democratic party.

Leave a Comment

Comment Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

httpbl_stats()