As a Briton, I’d like to point out that such has always been the stance of the majority of people in my country – yes, even from those of us who have lost loved ones over there (good evening) or know people who are currently fighting over there (good evening.)

It is also the stance of the majority of your country (hat tip Mr Wolcott.) The left is guilty of such spin, entrapping even my own, young, throbbingly conservative mind.

And yet, traditionally – that most sacred of justifications – you can call the guys starting and conducting a war a bunch of incompetent warmongering tosspots who intentionally misled the nation about the legitimacy of the information they based the case for war on (and were caught at it more than once,) who didn’t even bother planning for post war humanitarian concerns (that’s America too chuckles!) until after the war, yet now try to claim that liberation was one of the primary aims of the bloody thing, and it doesn’t magically become a denouncement of the bravery or dutifulness of the guys in the field.

We sell it on the predication that it’s rather blatantly true. Incidentally, since us Britons – legendary in our lack of patriotism – don’t often get called traitors or cowardly for pointing out any of this reality, I’d like to point out that your comment is a typically excessively pathetic and desperate rejoinder borne from a lack of the balls necessary to face plain facts and admit that yes – people from your country are dying because of bullshit artists and a grand mistake. This is understandable – doing so might, God forbid, also mean that you could have to admit that you were wrong – and that’s the real enemy worth fighting against.

-The Rev. Schmitt.

As a Briton, I’d like to point out that this has always been the stance of the majority of people in my country – and is shared even by some of us who have lost loved ones over there (good evening) or know people who are currently fighting over there (good evening.)

It is also the stance of the majority of your country (hat tip Mr Wolcott.) The left is guilty of such spin, entrapping even my own, young, throbbingly conservative mind.

And yet, traditionally – that most sacred of justifications – you can call the guys starting and conducting a war a bunch of incompetent warmongering tosspots who intentionally misled the nation about the legitimacy of the information they based the case for war on (and were caught at it more than once,) who didn’t even bother planning for post war humanitarian concerns (that’s America too chuckles!) until after the war, yet now try to claim that liberation was one of the primary aims of the bloody thing, and it doesn’t magically become a denouncement of the bravery or dutifulness of the guys in the field.

We sell it on the predication that it’s rather blatantly true. Incidentally, since us Britons – legendary in our lack of patriotism – don’t often get called traitors or cowardly for pointing out any of this reality, I’d like to suggest that your comment is a typically and excessively pathetic, desperate rejoinder borne from a lack of the balls necessary to face plain facts and admit that yes – people from your country are dying because of bullshit artists and a grand mistake. This is understandable – doing so might, God forbid, also mean that you could have to admit that you were wrong – and that’s the real enemy worth fighting against.

-The Rev. Schmitt.

As a Briton, I’d like to point out that such has always been the stance of the majority of people in my country – yes, even from those of us who have lost loved ones over there (good evening) or know people who are currently fighting over there (good evening.)

It is also the stance of the majority of your country (hat tip Mr Wolcott.) The left is guilty of such spin, entrapping even my own, young, throbbingly conservative mind.

And yet, traditionally – that most sacred of justifications – you can call the guys starting and conducting a war a bunch of incompetent warmongering tosspots who intentionally misled the nation about the legitimacy of the information they based the case for war on (and were caught at it more than once,) who didn’t even bother planning for post war humanitarian concerns (that’s America too chuckles!) until after the war, yet now try to claim that liberation was one of the primary aims of the bloody thing, and it doesn’t magically become a denouncement of the bravery or dutifulness of the guys in the field.

We sell it on the predication that it’s rather blatantly true. Incidentally, since us Britons – legendary in our lack of patriotism – don’t often get called traitors or cowardly for pointing out any of this reality, I’d like to point out that your comment is a typically excessively pathetic and desperate rejoinder borne from a lack of the balls necessary to face plain facts and admit that yes – people from your country are dying because of bullshit artists and a grand mistake. This is understandable – doing so might, God forbid, also mean that you could have to admit that you were wrong – and that’s the real enemy worth fighting against.

-The Rev. Schmitt.

He or she may or may not be prepared to give up, and therefore, I would make a legal-action-threat-free suggestion that you implement some sort of technical screening device at “Sadly, No!” that would make it more difficult, perhaps even nearly impossible, for visitors here to hijack the identity of others in their cowardly attempts to discredit and ruthlessly and disrespectfully ridicule their perceived enemies. This activity borders on slander, and, as such, renders legal avenues of protection more of a viable option for victims.

Hey, it’s history: it’s 70s porn.

Am I the one that figured this out? Sadly, No!

“[D]arn if I still didn’t find it hilarious”

Wow, is Wal-Mart having a sale on straw men this month?