Comments on: Hot For Treacher

By: Jim Treacher

Jim Treacher — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:05:57 +0000

Hi, Jamey!

By: Jamey

Jamey — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:25:51 +0000

Just checking back in to see if Ol’ Jim came here to give D. Aristophanes the Treach-around.

So, what’d I miss?

By: possumble

possumble — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:39:26 +0000

Oops, satur9us got there firstest and bestest @ 9:42.

By: Jim Treacher

Jim Treacher — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:20:23 +0000

Hi, kc! I thought it was somebody namestealing me and trying to be funny. And, of course, succeeding.

By: kc

kc — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:02:39 +0000

Will the real Jim Treacher please – OK, never mind, I see, that’s him with the three-day beard and slept-in clothes.

By: kc

kc — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:00:59 +0000

Is someone namestealing this Jim Treacher person and trying to make him look really stupid?

By: Jim Treacher

Jim Treacher — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:33:12 +0000

That was pretty good.

By: Jim Treacher

Jim Treacher — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:44:39 +0000

Hi Sadly, No commenters! Here is a witty and self-effacing rejoinder to your criticism of my obsession with a late night comedian’s botched joke and also a pre-emptive and passive-aggressive description of myself in unflattering terms to show that I ‘get it’ and am a good sport when it comes to cross-blog debate! For example – I’m a pedophile! But really, I’m not! But you think I am, don’t you! Or at least you think I will be driven to a state of spittle-flecked rage at the implication that I am! Ha ha – I know your tricks and I defeat them with self-deprecating wit instead of the sputtering outrage that you expected me to deliver! Ha ha! So how will YOU respond? Let the battle of who is cleverer and more facile with witty rejoinders begin!

By: Jim Treacher

Jim Treacher — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:02:18 +0000

Hi, satyr9us! There was once a Tori Spelling movie called “Mother, May I Sleep with Danger?”, and it was such an awful title that I thought it would be funny to adapt it and also I’m a pedophile. Also, thank you for calling it a career.

Anyway, thanks for the overwhelming flood of hits, you guys! Must’ve been at least 5.

By: Sirius Lunacy

Sirius Lunacy — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:04:49 +0000

FYWP
Sorry, was supposed to be a link. It was amusing, but the fun’s gone out of it now.

By: Sirius Lunacy

Sirius Lunacy — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:02:55 +0000

Checked terpitude

By: D. Aristophanes

D. Aristophanes — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:26:46 +0000

Hey Treacher – I’ve got an 8-ball and a case of Lucky Lager … let’s do this thing. 500 comments of back-and-forth that change not a single person’s opinion … I want it all.

By: possumble

possumble — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:44:31 +0000

The trick is not to click on his link, no matter how tempted you are to see what sort of mind could emit such nonstop kitty pudding. He’s counting those hits, y’see.

Anyway, he’s already changed the name from “Mother May I Sleep With Treacher.” Yep, he gave his site a child-rape fantasy name. Though he blames it all on Tori Spelling.

By: satyr9us

satyr9us — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:42:59 +0000

I’m sorry, I don’t have any fucking idea who this putz Jim Treacher is, and I’m pretty sure I don’t want to waste one millisecond of my life learning anything more about another goofy and batshit crazy wingnut making a public mockery of himself by wetting his pants in faux outrage over some completely stupid and pointless wingnut non-issue du jour.

The info nugget about Treacher that is crucial to interpreting this particular wet fart of a controversy is that until quite recently, his blog was titled "Mother, May I Sleep With Treacher?" Really. You read that right: he's built his sad little career as an intertubes person on the proposition that statutory rape is funny, and now his gambit at greater notoriety is to formulate an elaborate counterintuitive interpretation of a vanilla freaking late-night joke and to troll the blogs shrieking that anyone who disagrees is a child-rape apologist. It's impossible that he is serious -- the laws of physics as we currently know them don't allow for this degree of hypocrisy. Is he running some kind of long-game punk on RedState, NRO, and the Palins?

By: Jim Treacher

Jim Treacher — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:13:25 +0000

Uh-oh, Skippy the Bush Kangaroo caught me stalking him.

Hi, Suckersapien! I don’t know that Roy’s a rape apologist so much as a silly goose. That’s what I like to call him, anyway. But you could be right.

By: Suckersapien

Suckersapien — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:06:13 +0000

>Roy hasn’t run afoul of me! I like Roy just fine.

Oh, he’s one of the good rape apologists.

By: skippy

skippy — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:02:05 +0000

treacher spent an entire night responding to every single comment on thatreacher comes into the balloon juice comments at 10:29 pm on tuesday. his last comment was at 12:25 this morning, after which cole shut down the thread.
it was a spectacularly pathetic performance by treacher. (and i thought the letterman joke was really dickish)

after i wrote about letterman/palin on my piddling blog, treacher came by to comment twice (so far)! and he followed me to the political animal comment thread, too!

By: Jim Treacher

Jim Treacher — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:51:16 +0000

Roy hasn’t run afoul of me! I like Roy just fine.

By: D. Aristophanes

D. Aristophanes — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:45:22 +0000

I’m picturing something similar to the scene in Mosquito Coast, when the father, who’s been getting crazier and crazier, finally passes out and sleeps on the ground for two days.

Or he’s like that noseless meth freak in ‘The Salton Sea’ and he’s running around looking for his prosthetic honker

By: Duros62

Duros62 — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:38:27 +0000

I wonder if he had visions of Palin holding an audience with him while she sat on her bear skin-covered throne in Wasilla proclaiming: “Well done, thou good and faithful servant!”

Naked.