<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mooser</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-927682</link>
		<dc:creator>Mooser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 21:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-927682</guid>
		<description>What are the buildings in the picture. Do they have some significance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the buildings in the picture. Do they have some significance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Alison</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-927354</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-927354</guid>
		<description>Same same sex sex marraige is obviously a danger to all who sail in her.

Ahem. Speaking as an ex-mathematician, I can honestly say that politics never entered into our departments, except insofar as it related to dastardly plans by that evil administration to defraud honest mathematicians of their deserved livelihood, and the struggle between Pure and Applied (Stats, being so small a department, just trailed along behind).
I.e. departmental politics completely eclipsed any other variant of politics.

Also also, viz the pretendy commenter, I recommend asking a drunk mathematician about psychologists one day - it&#039;ll be educational, provided you bring a raincoat to protect you from the spittle. In my day, at least, psych students (and many psych academics) were despised for not understanding the minor statistical tools they used to &#039;prove&#039; things, and hence making a lot of grand an insupportable claims.

In closing: Mikey, it&#039;s grand to see you back again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same same sex sex marraige is obviously a danger to all who sail in her.</p>
<p>Ahem. Speaking as an ex-mathematician, I can honestly say that politics never entered into our departments, except insofar as it related to dastardly plans by that evil administration to defraud honest mathematicians of their deserved livelihood, and the struggle between Pure and Applied (Stats, being so small a department, just trailed along behind).<br />
I.e. departmental politics completely eclipsed any other variant of politics.</p>
<p>Also also, viz the pretendy commenter, I recommend asking a drunk mathematician about psychologists one day &#8211; it&#8217;ll be educational, provided you bring a raincoat to protect you from the spittle. In my day, at least, psych students (and many psych academics) were despised for not understanding the minor statistical tools they used to &#8216;prove&#8217; things, and hence making a lot of grand an insupportable claims.</p>
<p>In closing: Mikey, it&#8217;s grand to see you back again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-927333</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 23:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-927333</guid>
		<description>Same same sex is getting so old old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same same sex is getting so old old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigrismus</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926796</link>
		<dc:creator>tigrismus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926796</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Divocre would have to still be lagel … it’s the veritable thrid rial of marraige poiltics.&lt;/i&gt;

Reproduced for pure AWESOME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Divocre would have to still be lagel … it’s the veritable thrid rial of marraige poiltics.</i></p>
<p>Reproduced for pure AWESOME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Very Reverend Battleaxe of Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926768</link>
		<dc:creator>The Very Reverend Battleaxe of Knowledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926768</guid>
		<description>I had a teacher once who constantly used the word &quot;paramount&quot; to mean &quot;tantamount&quot;, and proudly, as if he was so impressed with his own vocabulary that he could scarcely contain himself. It&#039;s a goddamn wonder I didn&#039;t bite my tongue off over the course of three quarters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a teacher once who constantly used the word &#8220;paramount&#8221; to mean &#8220;tantamount&#8221;, and proudly, as if he was so impressed with his own vocabulary that he could scarcely contain himself. It&#8217;s a goddamn wonder I didn&#8217;t bite my tongue off over the course of three quarters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark f</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926750</link>
		<dc:creator>mark f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926750</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;in the course of his argument against the idea that conservatives are stupid, he uses the word “moribund” when he appears to mean “myriad”.&lt;/i&gt;

Either that, or else he&#039;s far more self-aware than we&#039;re giving him credit for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>in the course of his argument against the idea that conservatives are stupid, he uses the word “moribund” when he appears to mean “myriad”.</i></p>
<p>Either that, or else he&#8217;s far more self-aware than we&#8217;re giving him credit for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actor212</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926746</link>
		<dc:creator>actor212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926746</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“Interests of disclosure: I’m 23, a student of experimental psychology and psychometrics, with a standardized IQ of 137 according to the test I took about two years ago. I’m about as conservative as they come.”&lt;/i&gt;

&quot;I have a three inch penis and masturbate to pictures of Ayn Rand, Leni Riefenstahl and Eleanor Roosevelt...hey, a babe&#039;s a babe!...using tweezers.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“Interests of disclosure: I’m 23, a student of experimental psychology and psychometrics, with a standardized IQ of 137 according to the test I took about two years ago. I’m about as conservative as they come.”</i></p>
<p>&#8220;I have a three inch penis and masturbate to pictures of Ayn Rand, Leni Riefenstahl and Eleanor Roosevelt&#8230;hey, a babe&#8217;s a babe!&#8230;using tweezers.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard Pierce</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926733</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926733</guid>
		<description>The most super-awesome part of that reader response Jonah posted is that (a) the guy making the rebuttal &lt;i&gt;also&lt;/i&gt; hasn&#039;t actually read the paper, and (b) in the course of his argument against the idea that conservatives are stupid, he uses the word &quot;moribund&quot; when he appears to mean &quot;myriad&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most super-awesome part of that reader response Jonah posted is that (a) the guy making the rebuttal <i>also</i> hasn&#8217;t actually read the paper, and (b) in the course of his argument against the idea that conservatives are stupid, he uses the word &#8220;moribund&#8221; when he appears to mean &#8220;myriad&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiki</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926709</link>
		<dc:creator>kiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926709</guid>
		<description>Hono mups!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hono mups!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mythago</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926692</link>
		<dc:creator>mythago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 05:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926692</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Sure you could call gay marriage “Marraige” but then you get into all sort of problems as to how it is pronounced. &lt;/I&gt;

Not at all. As has been suggested by more fabulous people than my own self, you just need to gay it up a little. &quot;No, no, we don&#039;t want marriage; we want &lt;I&gt;mariage&lt;/I&gt;.&quot; (Pronounced marry-AHGE with a big dramatic rise on the second syllable.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Sure you could call gay marriage “Marraige” but then you get into all sort of problems as to how it is pronounced. </i></p>
<p>Not at all. As has been suggested by more fabulous people than my own self, you just need to gay it up a little. &#8220;No, no, we don&#8217;t want marriage; we want <i>mariage</i>.&#8221; (Pronounced marry-AHGE with a big dramatic rise on the second syllable.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goose</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926672</link>
		<dc:creator>Goose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 04:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926672</guid>
		<description>This one is a no brainer.   No pun intended.    I&#039;ve always said that the phrase &quot;intelligent Republican&quot; is an oxymoron.  

Listen to five minutes of Sean Hannity or Bill O&#039;Reilly.    Compare their &quot;reasoning&quot; to 5 minutes of NPR (which is not &quot;liberal&quot;, just not conservative).
Or read Jonah Goldberg or Bill Kristol and compare their assertions to Glenn Greenwald or Digby.

Or compare Sarah Palin to Janet Napolitano (both Western female governors although Napolitano now runs Homeland Security).

It&#039;s like the difference between a kindergarten coloring book and a college level physics text.

There is no irrational, groundless, factless, non-researched claim too outrageous to be declaimed by the top honchos in the conservative world- led by their god, Rush Limbaugh, before whom all must (and have) bow down.

There is no cow too sacred to be analyzed and questioned by the &quot;non-conservative&quot; media.   With lots of relevant, cogent, facts.  

One typical example:   &quot;Barack Hussein Obama is a Socialist.   He wants to pal around with terrorists.    His birth certificate is a fake.&quot;   blah, blah, blah.
That&#039;s the right wing approach to &quot;criticism.&quot;  

The non conservatives analyzed the legal arguments made by Justice Department Attorneys, compared statements made by Obama on the campaign trail with those in office on issues like State Secrets claims by the government, gays in the military, and closing GITMO.    Facts, logical analysis, reading the words in court decisions and in the Constitution.   Citing historical precedent.     Being rooted in the real.

Conservatives worry that terrorists from GITMO will somehow get loose and wreak havoc on the U.S. if they are transferred to U.S. prisons.
Non-conservatives note that we have somehow managed to try dozens of terrorists in federal courts in the U.S. and effectively (without a single escape) imprisoned the guilty.

In other words:  conservatives = fantasy.    Non-conservatives = reality.

You can use the word stupid if you want.    I prefer cowardly, nervous, hateful, and delusional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one is a no brainer.   No pun intended.    I&#8217;ve always said that the phrase &#8220;intelligent Republican&#8221; is an oxymoron.  </p>
<p>Listen to five minutes of Sean Hannity or Bill O&#8217;Reilly.    Compare their &#8220;reasoning&#8221; to 5 minutes of NPR (which is not &#8220;liberal&#8221;, just not conservative).<br />
Or read Jonah Goldberg or Bill Kristol and compare their assertions to Glenn Greenwald or Digby.</p>
<p>Or compare Sarah Palin to Janet Napolitano (both Western female governors although Napolitano now runs Homeland Security).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the difference between a kindergarten coloring book and a college level physics text.</p>
<p>There is no irrational, groundless, factless, non-researched claim too outrageous to be declaimed by the top honchos in the conservative world- led by their god, Rush Limbaugh, before whom all must (and have) bow down.</p>
<p>There is no cow too sacred to be analyzed and questioned by the &#8220;non-conservative&#8221; media.   With lots of relevant, cogent, facts.  </p>
<p>One typical example:   &#8220;Barack Hussein Obama is a Socialist.   He wants to pal around with terrorists.    His birth certificate is a fake.&#8221;   blah, blah, blah.<br />
That&#8217;s the right wing approach to &#8220;criticism.&#8221;  </p>
<p>The non conservatives analyzed the legal arguments made by Justice Department Attorneys, compared statements made by Obama on the campaign trail with those in office on issues like State Secrets claims by the government, gays in the military, and closing GITMO.    Facts, logical analysis, reading the words in court decisions and in the Constitution.   Citing historical precedent.     Being rooted in the real.</p>
<p>Conservatives worry that terrorists from GITMO will somehow get loose and wreak havoc on the U.S. if they are transferred to U.S. prisons.<br />
Non-conservatives note that we have somehow managed to try dozens of terrorists in federal courts in the U.S. and effectively (without a single escape) imprisoned the guilty.</p>
<p>In other words:  conservatives = fantasy.    Non-conservatives = reality.</p>
<p>You can use the word stupid if you want.    I prefer cowardly, nervous, hateful, and delusional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wiley</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926637</link>
		<dc:creator>wiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926637</guid>
		<description>Hey Till, you want another anecdote about Linus Pauling? When I was serving in nuclear forces in 78-79, it was understood that atmospheric testing was insane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Till, you want another anecdote about Linus Pauling? When I was serving in nuclear forces in 78-79, it was understood that atmospheric testing was insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926633</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926633</guid>
		<description>Divocre would have to still be lagel ... it&#039;s the veritable thrid rial of marraige poiltics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Divocre would have to still be lagel &#8230; it&#8217;s the veritable thrid rial of marraige poiltics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926627</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926627</guid>
		<description>Direct empirical correlation between conservatism &amp; stupidity + huge &amp; growing pile of instantly accessible &amp; free information on Teh Interwebz = GOP Moronageddon!

Looking forward to Michael Steele explaining why the most patriotic form of direct action Americans can perform in these troubling times is cracking yourself in the forehead with a hammer while huffing glue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Direct empirical correlation between conservatism &amp; stupidity + huge &amp; growing pile of instantly accessible &amp; free information on Teh Interwebz = GOP Moronageddon!</p>
<p>Looking forward to Michael Steele explaining why the most patriotic form of direct action Americans can perform in these troubling times is cracking yourself in the forehead with a hammer while huffing glue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia Grey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926589</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia Grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 01:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926589</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Interests of disclosure: I’m 23, a student of experimental psychology and psychometrics, with a standardized IQ of 137 according to the test I took about two years ago. I’m about as conservative as they come.&lt;/i&gt;

&quot;I couldn&#039;t resist the temptation to brag about my score, so I&#039;ll make myself look like a perfect fool. Despite what I would have been taught in those psychometrics classes, I apparently still don&#039;t understand that many exceptions can exist in a body of data that nevertheless demonstrates a significant statistical correlation.&quot;  

More proof -- if it was needed -- that high standardized IQ does NOT equal &quot;smart.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Interests of disclosure: I’m 23, a student of experimental psychology and psychometrics, with a standardized IQ of 137 according to the test I took about two years ago. I’m about as conservative as they come.</i></p>
<p>&#8220;I couldn&#8217;t resist the temptation to brag about my score, so I&#8217;ll make myself look like a perfect fool. Despite what I would have been taught in those psychometrics classes, I apparently still don&#8217;t understand that many exceptions can exist in a body of data that nevertheless demonstrates a significant statistical correlation.&#8221;  </p>
<p>More proof &#8212; if it was needed &#8212; that high standardized IQ does NOT equal &#8220;smart.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bad Bald Bastard</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926567</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bad Bald Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926567</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Can hermaphrodites get married? I am pretty sure it is legal in Brazil. I will have to get back to you on that after I do some more searches on Brazilian hermaphrodite love.&lt;/I&gt;

You&#039;re looking in the wrong &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=8nTE_989I_cC&amp;pg=PA44&amp;lpg=PA44&amp;dq=dominican+%22Guevodoces%22&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=App40yzTMF&amp;sig=3Al-L-L6tINb2IztE-XU8cX09SI&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=Jy8fStPIOoOGtgf08IntAw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;country&lt;/A&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Can hermaphrodites get married? I am pretty sure it is legal in Brazil. I will have to get back to you on that after I do some more searches on Brazilian hermaphrodite love.</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re looking in the wrong <a HREF="http://books.google.com/books?id=8nTE_989I_cC&amp;pg=PA44&amp;lpg=PA44&amp;dq=dominican+%22Guevodoces%22&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=App40yzTMF&amp;sig=3Al-L-L6tINb2IztE-XU8cX09SI&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=Jy8fStPIOoOGtgf08IntAw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1" rel="nofollow">country</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m13ky</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926555</link>
		<dc:creator>m13ky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926555</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Broad Conservatism factor can be identified when countries are used as units of analysis. &lt;/i&gt;

Yep. Conservative Broads are a serious problem.  I offer the malkin thing and pam&#039;s tits as objective data, and remind you that the plural of anecdote is data....

mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Broad Conservatism factor can be identified when countries are used as units of analysis. </i></p>
<p>Yep. Conservative Broads are a serious problem.  I offer the malkin thing and pam&#8217;s tits as objective data, and remind you that the plural of anecdote is data&#8230;.</p>
<p>mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Very Reverend Battleaxe of Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926510</link>
		<dc:creator>The Very Reverend Battleaxe of Knowledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926510</guid>
		<description>Which brings up the question of same-sex divorce. These 18,000  &quot;Marraiges&quot; that the California Supreme Court left alone--if they break up, can they get a divorce, or is same-sex divorce not recognized, either? Would it help if they spelled it &quot;Divocre&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which brings up the question of same-sex divorce. These 18,000  &#8220;Marraiges&#8221; that the California Supreme Court left alone&#8211;if they break up, can they get a divorce, or is same-sex divorce not recognized, either? Would it help if they spelled it &#8220;Divocre&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926476</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926476</guid>
		<description>No same same sex marriage!  Only new same sex marriages!  If you&#039;re going to defy God and marry someone of your own sex, you at least have to dump the loser your with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No same same sex marriage!  Only new same sex marriages!  If you&#8217;re going to defy God and marry someone of your own sex, you at least have to dump the loser your with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittlePig</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/21579.html#comment-926447</link>
		<dc:creator>LittlePig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=21579#comment-926447</guid>
		<description>Mawwiage is what bwings us togethew today...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mawwiage is what bwings us togethew today&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

