Nov
18

The ‘o’ stands for ‘objective journalism’




Posted at 17:44 by Gavin M.

osn.jpg

Of course, trademark violations are simply everywhere these days. If this one doesn’t work out, let me just say that I’m totally down with ‘OPP.’

16 Comments »

  1. Brad R. said,

    November 18, 2005 at 17:49

    Brilliant. I’d get rid of the “o” though and just make it “S,N!”

  2. Jillian said,

    November 18, 2005 at 19:09

    pssst…..the latest Swank is chock full o’ nutty goodness, including Dog psychologists and societal porno. Go now and partake! Let’s perpetuate the Swankmastide miracle into perpetual perpetuity!

  3. Anonymous said,

    November 18, 2005 at 19:11

    From the Oafish Stupid Morons site:

    Calling all bloggers! On Monday, November 21, Instapundit Glenn Reynolds will be ringmaster for a blog carnival, hosted right here on OSM. The topic? Pre-war military intelligence–what was known going into the war in Iraq, who knew it, and more importantly, what should we have known that we didn’t? To participate, write a blog post on this topic, and send the link to osmcarnival@gmail.com by Sunday, November 20, at 3 pm Eastern time. And check back here on Monday to read the results.

  4. Brad R. said,

    November 18, 2005 at 20:15

    Jill- I should do another preach-off soon. Maybe later today. We’ll see if I have the energy. I’ve had a long week.

  5. aaron said,

    November 18, 2005 at 20:54

    Wait, so their value add is thinking up a topic, opening a bag of cheetos, and then slapping some links together? Wow, talk about secret sauce. No one will ever be able to compete with such a winning formula.

  6. Vestal Vespa said,

    November 18, 2005 at 20:54

    Yeah, you know me.

  7. Vladi G said,

    November 18, 2005 at 21:28

    I can’t believe how long it took for someone to post that.

  8. mdhatter said,

    November 18, 2005 at 23:27

    that is awesome.

    though white on black would make it totally awesome ;)

  9. Timmah420 said,

    November 18, 2005 at 23:34

    No way, don’t get rid of the O. Now it’s like “Oh! Sadly, No!”
    I assert that is is way better. Way better.

  10. D. Sidhe said,

    November 19, 2005 at 1:54

    Yeah, this version gets my vote.

  11. Pinko Punko said,

    November 19, 2005 at 2:19

    I love the douchey logo. Looks like Lucent technology, doesn’t it, and probably a million other logos. maybe Ocean Spray?

    Ha ha- Cran-chazmo! Cran-insty!

  12. Pinko Punko said,

    November 19, 2005 at 8:00

    OH my lord. This has got to take the cake. There are a million different OSM sites. I can’t tell which is the real one. Check this one out.

  13. Pinko Punko said,

    November 19, 2005 at 8:03

    Let’s try that again.

  14. Marq said,

    November 19, 2005 at 9:16

    Ha ha- Cran-chazmo! Cran-insty!

    >30% fruit juice….

  15. Pinko Punko said,

    November 19, 2005 at 17:01

    hee hee!

    I love how OSM has huge buzz, but the worst worst worst kind. All people want to do is find other people sticking the knife in.

  16. mdh?tter said,

    November 20, 2005 at 6:11

    I’m waiting for the salt and lemon juice part.

Leave a Comment

  • Things of Interest

  • Meta Goodness

  • Clunkers

  • httpbl_stats()