<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ah, Time: My Old Enemy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cognitive dissident</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-919154</link>
		<dc:creator>cognitive dissident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-919154</guid>
		<description>I love Hawkins&#039; line about &quot;Unlike liberals, conservatives believe most Americans share our values and so, if you want to know what we think, all you have to do is ask us and we will tell you.&quot;

That explains the unprecedented secrecy of the Bush regime, the disappearing White House visitors’ logs, the secret energy policy meetings, the spying without warrants, the ghost detainees, the insistence on not giving straight answers (and especially not sworn testimony), the secret memos, and the general desire to avoid investigation into all the crimes that took place behind their resolutely closed doors.

Conservative politicians love to talk about their “values,” but they also feel a need to hide the huge disconnect between their rhetoric and the reality of their actions in office. Hmm…I wonder why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Hawkins&#8217; line about &#8220;Unlike liberals, conservatives believe most Americans share our values and so, if you want to know what we think, all you have to do is ask us and we will tell you.&#8221;</p>
<p>That explains the unprecedented secrecy of the Bush regime, the disappearing White House visitors’ logs, the secret energy policy meetings, the spying without warrants, the ghost detainees, the insistence on not giving straight answers (and especially not sworn testimony), the secret memos, and the general desire to avoid investigation into all the crimes that took place behind their resolutely closed doors.</p>
<p>Conservative politicians love to talk about their “values,” but they also feel a need to hide the huge disconnect between their rhetoric and the reality of their actions in office. Hmm…I wonder why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panurge</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-917917</link>
		<dc:creator>Panurge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-917917</guid>
		<description>Yeah to everything, but you know what?  

&lt;i&gt;We nominated this guy.  We also nominated Bill Clinton.  And Jimmy Carter, for that matter.&lt;/i&gt;

What does it say about hardcore liberalism that it can&#039;t seem to produce a similarly popular figure?  What does it say about the Democratic Party that it doesn&#039;t know how to help a liberal win?  It&#039;s a nominally liberal party that keeps making centrists President, who then become the public face of a party whose base is to their left; no wonder the whole spectacle gives the impression of a certain dishonesty.  The winger fallacy is simply that all this is somehow intentional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah to everything, but you know what?  </p>
<p><i>We nominated this guy.  We also nominated Bill Clinton.  And Jimmy Carter, for that matter.</i></p>
<p>What does it say about hardcore liberalism that it can&#8217;t seem to produce a similarly popular figure?  What does it say about the Democratic Party that it doesn&#8217;t know how to help a liberal win?  It&#8217;s a nominally liberal party that keeps making centrists President, who then become the public face of a party whose base is to their left; no wonder the whole spectacle gives the impression of a certain dishonesty.  The winger fallacy is simply that all this is somehow intentional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Argive</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-916673</link>
		<dc:creator>Argive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-916673</guid>
		<description>And of course I fucked up the link:

http://www.qando.net/details.aspx?Entry=4137</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course I fucked up the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.qando.net/details.aspx?Entry=4137" rel="nofollow">http://www.qando.net/details.aspx?Entry=4137</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Argive</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-916671</link>
		<dc:creator>Argive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-916671</guid>
		<description>Right Wing News was the first conservative blog I ever read, way back when I was a freshman in college.  I kept reading that trainwreck for years and years.  Teh unintentional funny is strong there.  I mean, at first it was bad enough just with Hawkins and the jackhole trolls that infest the comments (seriously, the comment section there is like scraping the bottom of a barrel located in a septic tank).  But now that he&#039;s got all those guest writers, man, the hilarity just does not stop.

&lt;em&gt;this is a center right country . . .&lt;/em&gt;

No.  No.  No it is bloody well not.  See, John, studies have shown that a decent number of Americans are &quot;ideologically&quot; right-of-center.  This means that if you ask them, for instance, whether they want more government programs, or whether they think the government should spend less money, a lot of people will usually say &quot;no&quot; and &quot;yes&quot; respectively (this is where most wingnuts stop reading).  BUT - if you then ask people whether Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid should be cut, the answer is a resounding no.  Ideologically conservative, operationally liberal.  Or, as Jon Henke put it, &lt;a&gt;leave me alone vs gimme a hand.&lt;/a&gt;  I realize that this is not a new insight, but wingnuts are real dumb.

But by all means, continue deluding yourself into thinking that you live in a conservative nation.  Doing so will only ensure that you sink further into obscurity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right Wing News was the first conservative blog I ever read, way back when I was a freshman in college.  I kept reading that trainwreck for years and years.  Teh unintentional funny is strong there.  I mean, at first it was bad enough just with Hawkins and the jackhole trolls that infest the comments (seriously, the comment section there is like scraping the bottom of a barrel located in a septic tank).  But now that he&#8217;s got all those guest writers, man, the hilarity just does not stop.</p>
<p><em>this is a center right country . . .</em></p>
<p>No.  No.  No it is bloody well not.  See, John, studies have shown that a decent number of Americans are &#8220;ideologically&#8221; right-of-center.  This means that if you ask them, for instance, whether they want more government programs, or whether they think the government should spend less money, a lot of people will usually say &#8220;no&#8221; and &#8220;yes&#8221; respectively (this is where most wingnuts stop reading).  BUT &#8211; if you then ask people whether Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid should be cut, the answer is a resounding no.  Ideologically conservative, operationally liberal.  Or, as Jon Henke put it, <a>leave me alone vs gimme a hand.</a>  I realize that this is not a new insight, but wingnuts are real dumb.</p>
<p>But by all means, continue deluding yourself into thinking that you live in a conservative nation.  Doing so will only ensure that you sink further into obscurity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Bina, Queen of Sheba</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-916178</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Bina, Queen of Sheba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 03:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-916178</guid>
		<description>Teh Fugly: Conservativz haz it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teh Fugly: Conservativz haz it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obabo</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915953</link>
		<dc:creator>obabo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915953</guid>
		<description>The wingnut is right in one regard; Liberals DO lie - to themselves - more than Conservatives do. A Liberal is more likely to believe in world peace and global justice, despite evidence that it is logically impossible and personally ruinous.

A Conservative would be just as bad about lying to others, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wingnut is right in one regard; Liberals DO lie &#8211; to themselves &#8211; more than Conservatives do. A Liberal is more likely to believe in world peace and global justice, despite evidence that it is logically impossible and personally ruinous.</p>
<p>A Conservative would be just as bad about lying to others, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smut Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915792</link>
		<dc:creator>Smut Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915792</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;conservatives are perpetually frustrated&lt;/i&gt;
He could have stopped there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>conservatives are perpetually frustrated</i><br />
He could have stopped there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zombie rotten  mcdonald</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915644</link>
		<dc:creator>zombie rotten  mcdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915644</guid>
		<description>umm, no they won&#039;t.

Because the bibble-thumping is just a facade;  what they really get off on is authoritarianism and scapegoating.

Although the APP would still give &#039;em the scapegoating, I concede.

But the possibility that an undeserving brown person may benefit from economic justice would make it a non-starter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umm, no they won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Because the bibble-thumping is just a facade;  what they really get off on is authoritarianism and scapegoating.</p>
<p>Although the APP would still give &#8216;em the scapegoating, I concede.</p>
<p>But the possibility that an undeserving brown person may benefit from economic justice would make it a non-starter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915630</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915630</guid>
		<description>#

Will Obama&#039;s Justice Department Prosecute Abbas for Murder? said,

May 14, 2009 at 19:31

By Edward Olshaker
Now that President Obama has opened the door to prosecuting Bush administration officials for legal opinions allowing waterboarding of al Qaeda leaders, it would be monumentally ironic and unjust if the door were not also open to prosecuting Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas for funding the murder of David Berger, the American-born member of the Israeli Olympic team slaughtered in Munich in 1972. [...] --Edited by the management. Surely a link would have been sufficient?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#</p>
<p>Will Obama&#8217;s Justice Department Prosecute Abbas for Murder? said,</p>
<p>May 14, 2009 at 19:31</p>
<p>By Edward Olshaker<br />
Now that President Obama has opened the door to prosecuting Bush administration officials for legal opinions allowing waterboarding of al Qaeda leaders, it would be monumentally ironic and unjust if the door were not also open to prosecuting Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas for funding the murder of David Berger, the American-born member of the Israeli Olympic team slaughtered in Munich in 1972. [...] &#8211;Edited by the management. Surely a link would have been sufficient?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actor212</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915570</link>
		<dc:creator>actor212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915570</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Here’s my machavellian plan: liberal activists should start an American People’s Party that is socially conservative (no to abortion, immigration and gay marrigages) and economically socialist just to see how many votes they can siphon off the republican party.&lt;/i&gt;

Holy crap. That&#039;s brilliant.

You could sell it as the party of Faith. After all, Jesus teaches us that as we treat the least among us, so shall we treat Him, so the Bible thumpers will eat this up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Here’s my machavellian plan: liberal activists should start an American People’s Party that is socially conservative (no to abortion, immigration and gay marrigages) and economically socialist just to see how many votes they can siphon off the republican party.</i></p>
<p>Holy crap. That&#8217;s brilliant.</p>
<p>You could sell it as the party of Faith. After all, Jesus teaches us that as we treat the least among us, so shall we treat Him, so the Bible thumpers will eat this up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harj</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915565</link>
		<dc:creator>Harj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915565</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my machavellian plan: liberal activists should start an American People&#039;s Party that is socially conservative (no to abortion, immigration and gay marrigages) and economically socialist just to see how many votes they can siphon off the republican party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my machavellian plan: liberal activists should start an American People&#8217;s Party that is socially conservative (no to abortion, immigration and gay marrigages) and economically socialist just to see how many votes they can siphon off the republican party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bad Bald Bastard</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915545</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bad Bald Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915545</guid>
		<description>You know, Mana Wanna Leia looked pretty hot in that slavekini.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Mana Wanna Leia looked pretty hot in that slavekini.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actor212</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915542</link>
		<dc:creator>actor212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915542</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;When two Polynesians vie for prestige, it’s a mana a mana struggle.&lt;/i&gt;

An da winnah kine say &quot;Mana wanna leia&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>When two Polynesians vie for prestige, it’s a mana a mana struggle.</i></p>
<p>An da winnah kine say &#8220;Mana wanna leia&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a concerned citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915535</link>
		<dc:creator>a concerned citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915535</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Did you mean “highest” 1%? I can’t quite follow the logic in an otherwise great post.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s not a bug, it&#039;s a feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Did you mean “highest” 1%? I can’t quite follow the logic in an otherwise great post.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s not a bug, it&#8217;s a feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smut Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915534</link>
		<dc:creator>Smut Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915534</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;When two Polynesians vie for prestige,&lt;/i&gt;

Some have doubts about taking part in the endless cycle of competition and revenge.
Taboo or not taboo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>When two Polynesians vie for prestige,</i></p>
<p>Some have doubts about taking part in the endless cycle of competition and revenge.<br />
Taboo or not taboo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smut Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915533</link>
		<dc:creator>Smut Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915533</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;the panoply of chins Jawhnny hauls around with him…&lt;/i&gt;
What do you have against Goitre-Americans?

&lt;i&gt;Big, heavy sticks, or those little Latte stir-sticks? Both of them scare me.&lt;/i&gt;
Look Marge! A new whacking stick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>the panoply of chins Jawhnny hauls around with him…</i><br />
What do you have against Goitre-Americans?</p>
<p><i>Big, heavy sticks, or those little Latte stir-sticks? Both of them scare me.</i><br />
Look Marge! A new whacking stick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bad Bald Bastard</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915523</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bad Bald Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915523</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Not a spelling flame, just an FYI for future reference: the phrase is “mano a mano.”&lt;/I&gt;

When two Polynesians vie for prestige, it&#039;s a &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mana&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mana a mana&lt;/A&gt; struggle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Not a spelling flame, just an FYI for future reference: the phrase is “mano a mano.”</i></p>
<p>When two Polynesians vie for prestige, it&#8217;s a <a HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mana" rel="nofollow">mana a mana</a> struggle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bad Bald Bastard</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915510</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bad Bald Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915510</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;That photo may be the single strongest argument against gay marriage I have ever seen.&lt;/I&gt;

Owlbear1 rolls 20, hugs for 2d6 extra damage.

&lt;I&gt; thought he was someone with Downs Syndrome that Steele was using as a political prop…&lt;/I&gt;
&amp;
&lt;I&gt;I didn’t get around to reading the post yet but wasn’t it nice of Michael Steele to take time to visit with the developmentally disabled. Is this only part of the Republican re-branding or will they be supporting increased funding?&lt;/I&gt;

This is a dispatch from the future, the Republican convention in which the Trig Palin/SteeleClone 2036 ticket is made official.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That photo may be the single strongest argument against gay marriage I have ever seen.</i></p>
<p>Owlbear1 rolls 20, hugs for 2d6 extra damage.</p>
<p><i> thought he was someone with Downs Syndrome that Steele was using as a political prop…</i><br />
&amp;<br />
<i>I didn’t get around to reading the post yet but wasn’t it nice of Michael Steele to take time to visit with the developmentally disabled. Is this only part of the Republican re-branding or will they be supporting increased funding?</i></p>
<p>This is a dispatch from the future, the Republican convention in which the Trig Palin/SteeleClone 2036 ticket is made official.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knights in White Satin</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915504</link>
		<dc:creator>Knights in White Satin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915504</guid>
		<description>&quot;Of course, if you went around saying it like that, the public would chase you with sticks...&quot;

Big, heavy sticks, or those little Latte stir-sticks?  Both of them scare me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Of course, if you went around saying it like that, the public would chase you with sticks&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Big, heavy sticks, or those little Latte stir-sticks?  Both of them scare me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bad Bald Bastard</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/19616.html#comment-915489</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bad Bald Bastard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=19616#comment-915489</guid>
		<description>Best succinct definition of Conservatism A=A-VAR!!!

Another bravura performance, Gavin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best succinct definition of Conservatism A=A-VAR!!!</p>
<p>Another bravura performance, Gavin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

