Comments on: Night of Teh Living Gheys

By: rodert rudis

rodert rudis — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:51:22 +0000

Just reading about gay-marry turn me on real hot and cold. We confess we been bustin in some straight houses and poking them in the belly button hole then we takes them to city hall and forces them to gay-merry. Every body generally has a good time. We had thought maybe we should charge extra for the merrying part since you can’t fight the city hall and never win. Those that don’t like it are but sore losing. What with that?

By: Goat or Panic

Goat or Panic — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:45:52 +0000

Great work Tintin. I got a screen (scream?) cap of the image at :55 seconds. It’s my new desk top image.
And I love that the Urkel looking chick at :19 is “afraid.” I’ll sleep well tonite, knowing I’ve done my job.

By: satch

satch — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:41:20 +0000

I am also late, but I heard Miz Maggs in an interview on NPR about a year and a half ago, during which she let slip that she had been abandoned by her husband and left to raise her kids as a single mother. Reason enough to be bitter, I suppose, but her references to the alleged harm done to children raised in gay households would apply more honestly to children abandoned by their father and raised in a single parent, no father household by a bitter, angry woman whose only remaining joy in life comes from stamping out any shred of happiness in as many people as she can get her grubby paws on.

By: John O

John O — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:19:38 +0000

I know I’m late and way behind, but I just wanted to thank you (once again) for the keyboard-ruining laugh, and sane perspective on ol’ Maggie, with whom I’ve shared several e-mails asking her, “WTF?”

Though much more politely, which is no longer a luxury she has earned.

What. A. Lunatic.

By: Bagelsan

Bagelsan — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:34:28 +0000

“Maggie Gallagher, …spends more time fixated on where gay people put their naughty bits than any gay person alive does”

Even PeeJ?

Oh I doubt that.

I was gonna say, I think *I* think about gay sex more than most people of *any* sexuality. Hell, I’m thinking about it right now! Yeah. Yeeeeahh…

…uh, I gotta go.

By: Ki Kendrick

Ki Kendrick — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:15:42 +0000

I thought I recognized the New Jersey reference, and upon checking their “fact sheet”, I was right. A church group was in the habit of renting their grounds to the general public for non-church-related events. A gay couple tried to rent the grounds for a civil union ceremony and the church refused to rent to them. They lost the suit on the grounds you can’t offer a service to the general public, and then exclude only a certain group.

A lot of the anti-gay propagandists tried to spin this into gays forcing their way into churches and demanding the church marry them.

By: The Lurking Redhead

The Lurking Redhead — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:08:07 +0000

“where plans are, as we speak, being made as to the appropriate response to the inevitable day when they are dragged out of their homes by the federal government and forced to gay-marry complete, but very gay, strangers.”

I’ve lived with gay men. I’ve lived with straight men. And i’ve got to say, being ‘forcibly married to a gay man onoez’ could only improve my social life, not to mention the overall cleanliness of my house.

Plus, we could go out and cruise the same guys and make rude comments about butts together. How cool would THAT be?

By: Tintin

Tintin — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:54:41 +0000

Fixing the ad so that the actors are on crosses is an awesome idea, but I’m afraid it is far beyond my meager skills at video editing. Let me think about it and see if there’s any feasible way for me to do it.

By: PeeJ

PeeJ — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:26:25 +0000

I hope someone does it. And gives them the full Passion of Christ treatment, blood, wounds and gore!

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:06:44 +0000

I saw the Sully video – the one I want to see is the one that photoshops all the actors onto crosses…

By: PeeJ

PeeJ — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:54:15 +0000

It’ll be raining men! Hallelujah, raining men! Someone doctored the ad with exactly that motif. I saw it at Andrew Sullivan's yesterday and it's up at Salon today. Oh alright...here it is at Sully's.

By: cur

cur — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:33:14 +0000

I am pretty sure that the doc in the video is a homopathic practitioner.

cur

By: J—

J— — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:23:35 +0000

And I’m sure we’re going to leave the nutritional value of pork and shell fish out of nutrition units in health class because we can’t talk about abominations (even if Christians believe the were magically given the divine “Okie Dokie” so Paul could attract more converts among the gentiles.) some Jewish parents might have a problem with a curriculum that might tempt their children to consume trefe.

I do want teachers at schools, especially public schools, to talk about how God ordained that I rule over the creepy things that creep on earth, among other things. I am the Creep Master!

By: robert green

robert green — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:20:29 +0000

brilliant. bravo tintin.

By: Moon Dragon

Moon Dragon — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:19:43 +0000

And I suppose we can’t discuss the effects of divorce on families in class since
recognition of the reality of divorce is going to be offensive to some parents of catholic children.

And don’t get me started on school lunches.

By: t4toby

t4toby — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:01:58 +0000

Awesome, tintin.

Fucking wankers. I saw that lady on Hardball the other night. She is completely reprehensible, slovenly, and apparently possessing no soul.

No wonder she looks for reasons to hate other people. There is no way she can look at herself in any light without wanting to reach for another pint of B & J.

By: Sjofn

Sjofn — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:52:27 +0000

The lesbian couple didn’t find another doctor because this particular bigot was the only practice around that took their insurance (apparently they were covered for it! Which seems weird in itself.). So part of the argument was that they couldn’t reasonably be expected to go somewhere else or something.

By: J—

J— — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:30:29 +0000

Dragon-King Wangchuck: Did you see how they try to tie it to marriage? The case dates from 1999 and has to do with discrimination based on sexual orientation. The California Supreme Court last year ruled unanimously in Benitez’s favor, and it appears one of the justices, I assume in a concurring opinion, made mention of the same court’s recent decision on marriage. The NOM people use this little tiny thing as the basis for their claim about same-sex marriage and California doctors.

I’m sure all the other pieces that make up the “Gathering Storm” ad are built on similarly flimsy foundations, but I’m not going to take up my time looking into them.

By: N.C.

N.C. — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:27:46 +0000

How about if my reponse is : I’m athiest\agnostic. I really couldn’t give a fuck about your pagan religion. Quit trying to force it on us.

Their response will then be a gasp, then “quit trying to shove your atheism down my throat”, since they deliberately conflate disagreement with censorship.

By: larkspur

larkspur — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:32:38 +0000

Maybe the woman at 1:03 played it with extra zombie sauce as a valiant effort to subvert the message this sucky economy was compelling her to deliver.

Points for identifying the source when I tell Gallagher that she’s a painbow, not a rainbow. But some people have to live in the problem.