<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ho-Hum, Sight Of Trivial Personalities Decomposing In The Yadda-Yadda1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kip W</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-862366</link>
		<dc:creator>Kip W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-862366</guid>
		<description>Ah, MzNicky, though I&#039;ve seen the Laurel &amp; Hardy version several times, the Disney &quot;Babes in Toyland&quot; is still the one for me. I was surprised to learn, a few years ago, just how completely different it is from the original stage version. Disney&#039;s hirelings repurposed the songs they kept in, and the song I enjoy the most when I watch it is entirely new (&quot;Slowly, slowly, he sank into the sea...&quot; with Henry Calvin and Gene Sheldon). Ray Bolger&#039;s good in that, too, and... well, Annette... mmmmm... she was at her best, I&#039;ll say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, MzNicky, though I&#8217;ve seen the Laurel &amp; Hardy version several times, the Disney &#8220;Babes in Toyland&#8221; is still the one for me. I was surprised to learn, a few years ago, just how completely different it is from the original stage version. Disney&#8217;s hirelings repurposed the songs they kept in, and the song I enjoy the most when I watch it is entirely new (&#8220;Slowly, slowly, he sank into the sea&#8230;&#8221; with Henry Calvin and Gene Sheldon). Ray Bolger&#8217;s good in that, too, and&#8230; well, Annette&#8230; mmmmm&#8230; she was at her best, I&#8217;ll say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctorb</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-858201</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctorb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-858201</guid>
		<description>Consarn it, I punched this into a UNIVAC and drive a team of oxen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consarn it, I punched this into a UNIVAC and drive a team of oxen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tone in DC</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857837</link>
		<dc:creator>Tone in DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857837</guid>
		<description>regarding the Sheeshmeister...
For him, a Radio Shack TRS-80 and a damn Edsel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>regarding the Sheeshmeister&#8230;<br />
For him, a Radio Shack TRS-80 and a damn Edsel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigrismus</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857711</link>
		<dc:creator>tigrismus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857711</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;try not opening your opinion-piece with “sheesh” unless you want to create the impression that you typed it out on a Commodore-64 &amp; drive a K-Car&lt;/i&gt;

Aw, man.  Oh shit, that probably gives the impression I drive a beetle and use a PDP-10...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>try not opening your opinion-piece with “sheesh” unless you want to create the impression that you typed it out on a Commodore-64 &amp; drive a K-Car</i></p>
<p>Aw, man.  Oh shit, that probably gives the impression I drive a beetle and use a PDP-10&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawnguylander</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857613</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawnguylander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857613</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwh7iilWrp0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I like fucking.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwh7iilWrp0" rel="nofollow">I like fucking.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smut Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857485</link>
		<dc:creator>Smut Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857485</guid>
		<description>The good thing about anal-retentiveness is, well, retention -- the crap stays fresh right up to the moment I need it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good thing about anal-retentiveness is, well, retention &#8212; the crap stays fresh right up to the moment I need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rightwingsnarkle</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857474</link>
		<dc:creator>Rightwingsnarkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857474</guid>
		<description>I like to pour a little extra virgin olive oil on my crap - just enough to cover, to prevent that brown crusty top from forming.

I also keep it towards the back of the fridge, where it&#039;s colder and people are less likely to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to pour a little extra virgin olive oil on my crap &#8211; just enough to cover, to prevent that brown crusty top from forming.</p>
<p>I also keep it towards the back of the fridge, where it&#8217;s colder and people are less likely to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857472</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857472</guid>
		<description>The problem with buying extra crap when it&#039;s on sale is that it really doesn&#039;t keep well. Unless you freeze it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with buying extra crap when it&#8217;s on sale is that it really doesn&#8217;t keep well. Unless you freeze it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857470</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857470</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s fair to say that none of us have all the crap we need.

It could be because the banks are hogging it all.

We&#039;ve gotta get that crap back out to the people!

mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s fair to say that none of us have all the crap we need.</p>
<p>It could be because the banks are hogging it all.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve gotta get that crap back out to the people!</p>
<p>mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rightwingsnarkle</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857464</link>
		<dc:creator>Rightwingsnarkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857464</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;buy the crap from the banks&lt;/i&gt;

I saw a sign yesterday advertising crap at $1.39/pound. I picked up a couple of pounds. It&#039;s good to have some on hand - you never know when guests will just drop in, and when they do they&#039;re gonna want some crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>buy the crap from the banks</i></p>
<p>I saw a sign yesterday advertising crap at $1.39/pound. I picked up a couple of pounds. It&#8217;s good to have some on hand &#8211; you never know when guests will just drop in, and when they do they&#8217;re gonna want some crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857455</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857455</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m shocked and offended that Barack Obama isn&#039;t a good enough sport to attend the press&#039;s Gridiron dinner to joke with members of the press. What a stuck-up serious grind of a guy. I mean - yeah, the economy is serious, but can&#039;t the guy lighten up a little?

Oh, wait. Hang on, let me take this call.

Ahem. I&#039;m shocked and offended that Barack Obama has the insensitivity and temerity to laugh and joke while being interviewed on 60 mintues about the economy. Doesn&#039;t he know how serious this is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m shocked and offended that Barack Obama isn&#8217;t a good enough sport to attend the press&#8217;s Gridiron dinner to joke with members of the press. What a stuck-up serious grind of a guy. I mean &#8211; yeah, the economy is serious, but can&#8217;t the guy lighten up a little?</p>
<p>Oh, wait. Hang on, let me take this call.</p>
<p>Ahem. I&#8217;m shocked and offended that Barack Obama has the insensitivity and temerity to laugh and joke while being interviewed on 60 mintues about the economy. Doesn&#8217;t he know how serious this is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857446</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857446</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really nothing but a political calculation about what&#039;s possible and what&#039;s not.

The Fed is legally empowered to make &quot;loans&quot;.  If you are the executive and you need funds to nationalize, you have to appropriate them.  

Thru congress.

So if you can make the case that the banks are illiquid rather than insolvent, that is, that these &quot;legacy assets&quot; are actually undervalued due to the economy being in the bucket rather than worthless in an absolute sense, you can present this as the best solution.

Plus, of course, if you give people enough free money and they buy the crap from the banks, the banks can (theoretically) get private capital and become financially healthy again.  If you offer people free money and they STILL don&#039;t buy the crap from the banks, you&#039;ll know the banks are actually and officially insolvent and you&#039;ll have to take them into receivership, but at that point nobody will be able to argue with you.

If you think about it politically rather than financially, it&#039;s a pretty good plan...

mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really nothing but a political calculation about what&#8217;s possible and what&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>The Fed is legally empowered to make &#8220;loans&#8221;.  If you are the executive and you need funds to nationalize, you have to appropriate them.  </p>
<p>Thru congress.</p>
<p>So if you can make the case that the banks are illiquid rather than insolvent, that is, that these &#8220;legacy assets&#8221; are actually undervalued due to the economy being in the bucket rather than worthless in an absolute sense, you can present this as the best solution.</p>
<p>Plus, of course, if you give people enough free money and they buy the crap from the banks, the banks can (theoretically) get private capital and become financially healthy again.  If you offer people free money and they STILL don&#8217;t buy the crap from the banks, you&#8217;ll know the banks are actually and officially insolvent and you&#8217;ll have to take them into receivership, but at that point nobody will be able to argue with you.</p>
<p>If you think about it politically rather than financially, it&#8217;s a pretty good plan&#8230;</p>
<p>mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857441</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857441</guid>
		<description>I think that bonuses are bonuses, but that isn&#039;t the point, now is it?  
Who has ever thought of stock options or bonuses without considering the underlying company, amirite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that bonuses are bonuses, but that isn&#8217;t the point, now is it?<br />
Who has ever thought of stock options or bonuses without considering the underlying company, amirite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857439</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857439</guid>
		<description>In case I wasn&#039;t clear, I do get that shareholders get cleaned out in a nationalization, but I was wondering...who even banks on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case I wasn&#8217;t clear, I do get that shareholders get cleaned out in a nationalization, but I was wondering&#8230;who even banks on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tensor</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857438</link>
		<dc:creator>tensor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857438</guid>
		<description>Also, &quot;bankstas.&quot; Bedtime for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, &#8220;bankstas.&#8221; Bedtime for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tensor</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857437</link>
		<dc:creator>tensor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857437</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Why isn’t it the same effing thing? &lt;/I&gt;

Because (a) the current plan is for the government to &quot;take the toxic assets off the banks&#039; books,&quot; i.e. private profit, public risk; (b) it leaves in charge the same greedy clowns who got us here -- why argue over their bonuses, when we could just FIRE THEM? -- (c) once we own the banks, we can do the full &amp; public accounting these clowns have resisted thus far. As Atrios has explained, part of the problem so far is that none of the banksters (I prefer &quot;bakstas&quot;) has to admit insolvency.

Sorry if that came off a bit rough. The needless suffering these clowns caused argues for pitchforks and tar, not arguing over bonuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why isn’t it the same effing thing? </i></p>
<p>Because (a) the current plan is for the government to &#8220;take the toxic assets off the banks&#8217; books,&#8221; i.e. private profit, public risk; (b) it leaves in charge the same greedy clowns who got us here &#8212; why argue over their bonuses, when we could just FIRE THEM? &#8212; (c) once we own the banks, we can do the full &amp; public accounting these clowns have resisted thus far. As Atrios has explained, part of the problem so far is that none of the banksters (I prefer &#8220;bakstas&#8221;) has to admit insolvency.</p>
<p>Sorry if that came off a bit rough. The needless suffering these clowns caused argues for pitchforks and tar, not arguing over bonuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The late Natasha Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857436</link>
		<dc:creator>The late Natasha Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857436</guid>
		<description>Xecky, while there is no actual proof that Michael Wolff is a necrophliac, it would be irresponsible not to speculate.  Just &lt;i&gt;look at him&lt;/i&gt;, for God&#039;s sake.  Also note the aroma of embalming fluid on his breath.

So please, please, please don&#039;t divulge the exact location of my gravesite to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xecky, while there is no actual proof that Michael Wolff is a necrophliac, it would be irresponsible not to speculate.  Just <i>look at him</i>, for God&#8217;s sake.  Also note the aroma of embalming fluid on his breath.</p>
<p>So please, please, please don&#8217;t divulge the exact location of my gravesite to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857434</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857434</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t get why nationalizing the banks is less problematic than &quot;buying up overpriced stocks&quot;.  Why isn&#039;t it the same effing thing?  BTW, comma outside of quotes because:  fragment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t get why nationalizing the banks is less problematic than &#8220;buying up overpriced stocks&#8221;.  Why isn&#8217;t it the same effing thing?  BTW, comma outside of quotes because:  fragment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tensor</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857433</link>
		<dc:creator>tensor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857433</guid>
		<description>Gotta love that first comment:

&quot;He will do till either you get elected president or someone else who meets your high standards comes along.&quot;

That&#039;ll leave a mark!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta love that first comment:</p>
<p>&#8220;He will do till either you get elected president or someone else who meets your high standards comes along.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;ll leave a mark!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/18818.html/comment-page-4#comment-857432</link>
		<dc:creator>ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=18818#comment-857432</guid>
		<description>The Dow rallied in response to the improved prospects for Sarah Palin/Joe teh Plumber in 2012.
~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dow rallied in response to the improved prospects for Sarah Palin/Joe teh Plumber in 2012.<br />
~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
