Comments on: Hooray! Creationist Cartoons!

By: loyh vabcnlmuf

loyh vabcnlmuf — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:13:04 +0000

jyrpfi dvtwpr kunopbywr oznaqlj kpghuce haljfikw kcpd

By: TorryMorgonob

TorryMorgonob — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:16:51 +0000

Hi all!

http://hochuvtop.007sites.com/best-free-anti-virus-sof.html
http://hochuvtop.007sites.com/bourke-dooney-ebay-watch.html
http://hochuvtop.007sites.com/box-ebay-steering.html
http://hochuvtop.007sites.com/buell-on-ebay.html
http://hochuvtop.007sites.com/buy-ebay-in-mexico-s.html
http://hochuvtop.007sites.com/canberra-yahoo-hotmail-ms.html
http://hochuvtop.007sites.com/cant-connect-to-ebay.html
http://hochuvtop.007sites.com/change-hotmail-email-address.html

G’night

By: kenya carmona

kenya carmona — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:35:16 +0000

dear google i can`t balieve you let youtube say that BillyRayCyrus had
just now died i think they should never say that BillyRayCyrus died it
is a bit to shoking for people like me and people who love love Miley &
her loving father so CUT! that episode off of youtube again and tell real
things also i forgot cut off the other episodes that said BillyRayCyrus
died so i and the rest of the world could live the rest of are happy lives
so don`t missplace this coment but put it in the news paper so the earth
can see what a horrble example to kids and their favorite stars.

By: kara malone

kara malone — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:04:19 +0000

i cant be leave youtube says that billy didnt make it that hurts a lot hes my favorite artist it hurts i belived it

By: pit

pit — Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:22:49 +0000

HAHA funny I work with a guy that believe that the earth was flooded am having a go at him(gently)I have studied the sciences.and have done geology for over 20 years. As far as i am concerned the most creationist are poorly educated and terrified of the truth which is realy at stake.i think if they had been educated in the sciences they would have abandoned the STORIES that they take as facts and start to paint a picture on the Probable Truth Based on the EVIDENCE. and that is pretty heavy oh by the way check this out
http://www.solarviews.com/eng/tercrate.htm

By: Ray

Ray — Sat, 15 Oct 2005 10:01:11 +0000

How can any man claim to be intelligent and believe that “we all came from a pool of water and rock stuff”. Any one know why that BIG BANG THEORY isn’t happining anymore. Oh yeah, it is just an imaginary fairy tale.

By: Timmah420

Timmah420 — Thu, 29 Sep 2005 02:00:55 +0000

We share 99.5 to 99.9 percent of our genetic material with chimpanzees. Not to mention the pysical similarities.
If that’s not proof enough for you, hand a brand new digital camera to a chimp, then record his reaction to it, then hand it to a man unfamiliar with technology. Notice any similarities in their trial and error methods?

By: Karl

Karl — Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:48:37 +0000

Watchman –

Go to your nearest window. If you were to jump out of that window, do you believe that you would fall? Why do you believe that? There is no scientific proof that you’d fall. You believe that you’d fall for two reasons: 1) The vast body of evidence available to you indicates that you would fall, and 2) You don’t find the theory of gravity to be an upsetting theory; it doesn’t tell you something that you don’t want to hear.

If #2 weren’t the case, then I guess you’d spend a lot of your time jumping out of windows.

By: watchman

watchman — Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:06:14 +0000

If by not embracing totally the theory of evolution as scientific fact I am being unscientific, well, I guess you got me. Show me one bit of evidence that one species evolved from another and we’ll talk. Meanwhile, I’m not about to toss away everything I believe and base my life on this evaluated theory. I will also add that if you base your whole belief system on something that can’t be proven, then you believe because you want to believe. This is more an act of faith than of science and becomes religion and your theories nothing but dogma.

By: Karl

Karl — Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:56:25 +0000

Watchman –

Sorry, but yes, you ARE being anti-science if you reject evolution. In terms of how scientific theories are evaluated, evolution has shown itself to be spectacularly successful. There are minor unresolved issues and vast amounts yet to be learned, but to reject evolution is to reject the validity of the scientific method. Period.

And rejecting science is something you can do, if you want. If it pleases you, you can believe that light bulbs give off light because there are luminescent fairies inside them. Just don’t try to pretend that your belief isn’t unscientific.

By: Father Tyme

Father Tyme — Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:09:35 +0000

Misubishi seems to be doing a fine job in the Brazilian Rainforest! So far they haven’t found any dinosaurs there, just in Tokyo.
But if there were dinosaurs before the flood they evidently didn’t stroll into Jerusalem or Mecca. I guess they, at least the plant eaters, became extinct trying to live on desert grass. Then the carnivores died because the plant eaters were gone. If only T-Rex had the instinct to start eating Noah and his family, Arabs, Jews, Muslims, and all the other sects non-discriminately they’d still be around, sigh!
If God won’t allow extinction I guess that explains where the dodos went. Science has been searching the Galapagos but they’re right here in D.C. camoed (?) as Republicans;Neo-Comtemptuous Democratus.

By: D. Sidhe

D. Sidhe — Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:08:51 +0000

Believe it or not, some creationists do embrace stuff like plesiosaurs and cadborosaurs as sea monsters, and Mokele-mbembe as a modern-day dinosaur, and something called a Kongomato as a pterosaur, and even a prehistoric giant lemur, Megaladapis, as a creature known now to indigenous peoples of Madagascar as a Tokandia.
They view these myths as proof that species don’t die out, because God would not allow it. This is, I understand, one of the major reasons people were so averse to Darwin’s original theories.
So, yeah. There are creationists who think, I guess, that Noah saved the dinosaurs and the other prehistoric creatures, and that they’re still alive in places like Loch Ness and the Amazon rainforest.
None of which seems to make them want to not raze these places, for some reason.

By: Marq

Marq — Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:12:36 +0000

If they want to play the Noah's Ark game, why do they bother saying that the dinosaurs where on the ark? Why not explain that this is how they went extinct?

The problem here is that God told Noah "2 of each kind of animal!" And if Noah left out a few thousand types of animal, presumably God woulda been a mite ticked off. So, in order for Noah to have been the obedient servant that the Bible makes him out to be, it has to be all or nothing.

By: Marq

Marq — Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:02:18 +0000

You know, he probably did have unicorns on the ark. He probably just got two that hated each other and weren't willing to get sexy, even to save the species.

Naaah--the real scoop regarding the unicorns is that they went extince due to the fact that Viagra was thousands of years away from being invented yet. If the female unicorn could have spoken, like back in Eden, she would have shouted at Noah, "Not him! Not that one!! Noooooooo!!!" But, alas, she could not. During the long journey, in a fit of depression, she hurled herself overboard, drowning. The male unicorn never even noticed that she was gone--he was, after all, an insufferable narcissist.

By: watchman

watchman — Tue, 27 Sep 2005 06:56:46 +0000

No problem with your cookie experiment unless, rather than realize there was more to be done, you tried to sell me on the idea that your first batch was a success and I am anti-science if I don’t accept your charred experiment as a cookie.

By: Stacy BT

Stacy BT — Tue, 27 Sep 2005 05:48:57 +0000

Let’s say you want to make some cookies, but you’ve never made them before and don’t have a recipe. So you go to the kitchen, mix together some flour, sugar, and water until it’s thick enough to form balls, which you then bake for 15 minutes at 400 degrees. This is a hypothesis for cookie-making. When you take the cookies out of the oven, you discover they are quite burned, so you try again, same recipe, only for 10 minutes at 350. You have amended your hypothesis because the experiment didn’t give you good results. Now the cookies aren’t burned, but they are very dry and flavorless. So you further amend your hypothesis that you have a valid cooking time and temperature, but your ingredients need work. Contine until you pull something that tastes good out of the oven.

That is science. You don’t assume anything, you merely make hypotheses, and test them, over and and over and over again, making amendments as necessary, until you have something that works.
And when you do have something that works, you write it down somewhere, and keep going. What happens if you add chocolate chips? Or chopped liver? Or remove the sugar and add splenda? Even when you are satisfied with the results of the experiment, there is more knowledge to be gained.

By: watchman

watchman — Tue, 27 Sep 2005 03:33:30 +0000

Let me get this straight. The way science “works” is that all evaluations, especially the ones based upon theory, should be treated as wrong (or at least incomplete and questionable) pending new and better evidence to contradict them. Hummm.

By: Tlachtga

Tlachtga — Tue, 27 Sep 2005 02:52:42 +0000

Here’s what I don’t get. If they want to play the Noah’s Ark game, why do they bother saying that the dinosaurs where on the ark? Why not explain that this is how they went extinct? It’s (relatively) more plausable than Noah herding dinosaurs onto the ark, or building an incubator or whatever the hell they’re thinking.

And then were did the dinosaurs go when the ark landed? What, are there dragons in the hills, too?

By: Timmah420

Timmah420 — Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:15:22 +0000

did anyone catch the graphic on the website that hosts the cartoon?
Brontosaurus’s and deer living side by side, awesome! (And educational)

By: mdh?tter

mdh?tter — Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:15:26 +0000

Hello! Stem cells, hello!