Contransmagnificandjewbangtantiality “Transubstantiation” dagnab it.

fixt

In case anyone was wondering, this is indeed how we speak in Neusalan, when we aren’t being et by wild dogs

Indeed
‘Its some kind of thing it aint us but yet its in us. Its looking out thru our eye hoals. “

I hadn’t been over to Clown Hall to visit Michael “Porn-stache” Medved for a while

That would explain why the first picture of Medved in this post looks remarkably similar to Pat Boone’s “boxing the clown” moment…

Right. Anyone who’s read V for Vendetta knows Moore’s no friend to conservatives… he writes in the introduction for the collection that he was specifically reacting to Thatcher’s horrendous policy.

The big clue (and here I’m being a bit facetious, as it’s less a “clue” and more like “grabbing you by the lapels”) is the prose piece by the scientist somewhat responsible for the creation of Doc Manhattan, explaining his in-story famous quote (“God exists, and he’s American”)… and why he found the implications of that so terrifying.

It is above all else about rebuking the superhero myth, that people elevated to godlike status somehow become better for it — Moore believed it would simply magnify human flaws to catastrophic, tragic results. His lambasting of bigoted conservative commentary is made evident in his portrait of a right-wing rag, but then he’s not very kind to liberals in that regard, either. Basically, he was very pessimistic about ALL people at the time.

/nerdscholar

Sorry man, I was referring to those other zombies, not the good ones like you. Some of my best friends are zombies!

Episcopalians are pretty cool, but getting confirmed doesn’t mean you automatically get to fuck bishops.

P.S. Cilantro is empirically good.

Are you TRYING to piss me off? Cuz I swear, I will go find a troll and bring him back here.

We all know there are good zombies and bad zombies. Zombie Joseph Beuys, good; Zombie Tomás de Torquemada, BAD. The existence of bad zombies is no bad reflection on zombies as a whole, and pointing it out should be no skin off their noses. So to speak.

That’s awesome! (Too good to be true?)

Really…troll thinks that’s something most of us would be upset about, if that was actually the case. Stupid troll is stupid.

Eusa wuz angre he wuz in rayj & he kep pulin on the Littl Man the Addoms owt strecht arms

Trubba Not, Smut Clyde

Right on B.O. tell it how it is! Taking the life of INNOCENT human beings is deplorable and no religion would ever condone it! Of course, witches, gays, scientists, and other heretic scum are by no means innocent, so: off with their heads!!!

That’s awesome! (Too good to be true?)

Ken Lowery – haven’t read the comic but I found this interesting:

Bradford Wright described Watchmen as “Moore’s obituary for the concept of heroes in general and superheroes in particular.”[17] Putting the story in a contemporary sociological context, Wright wrote that the characters of Watchmen were Moore’s “admonition to those who trusted in ‘heroes’ and leaders to guard the world’s fate.” He added that to place faith in such icons was to give up personal responsibility to “the Reagans, Thatchers, and other ‘Watchmen’ of the world who supposed to ‘rescue’ us and perhaps lay waste to the planet in the process”.[36] Moore specifically stated in 1986 that he was writing Watchmen to be “not anti-Americanism, [but] anti-Reaganism,” specifically believing that “at the moment a certain part of Reagan’s America isn’t scared. They think they’re invulnerable.”[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchmen