Dec
11

Blago Bung1




Posted at 1:18 by Gavin M.

Shorter Michelle Malkin:

Boomerang: The Democrat culture of corruption

  • Apropos Blagojevich, it was unwise for Democrats to uncover corruption by Republicans,2 for their accusations have now ‘boomeranged,’ accruing instead to themselves in a rubber/glue fashion.

‘Shorter’ concept created by Daniel Davies and perfected by Elton Beard. We are aware of all Internet traditions.™

1 Bosso fataka.
2 Cf., et seq.

152 Comments »

  1. jurassicpork said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:19

    Pottersville in Pictures: Rod Blagojevich edition.

  2. noen said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:23

    Is that Alex Jones in the background?

  3. Tyrone Shoelaces said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:28

    It’s still Groundhog Day.

    It’s ALWAYS Groundhog Day.

  4. Tyrone Shoelaces said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:31

    It’s still Groundhog Day,

    It’s ALWAYS Groundhog Day, Mr Torrance.

  5. Tyrone Shoelaces said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:38

    We may have been delivered from the Groundhog Day Effect. It doesn’t seem to effectualize anymore.

  6. goober said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:43

    You’re only about two days late, Gavin.

    Bra-VO.

  7. Gavin M. said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:45

    [?] Two days late how?

  8. Righteous Bubba said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:45

    Those Democrat bastards will find that applying the Rule of Law to everyone means that it applies to EVERYONE, HAHAHA!

  9. Righteous Bubba said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:47

    Goober believes that the site that makes fun of right wing loons should cover news that he wants covered BECAUSE.

  10. Gavin M. said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:49

    Well, but even so, the Malkin item is from today. Has the Blago story crested or something?

  11. Tyrone Shoelaces said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:54

    She ought to take a fie gallon bucket around with her so she can stand on it.

  12. Righteous Bubba said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:54

    You were required to post something about a potential embarrassment to Obama the second the potential embarrassment to Obama occurred. Alas, you have failed the Gooberian Integritude Test.

  13. tigrismus said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:56

    The Democrats have met the culture of corruption, and it looks like it ain’t just elephants among the jackasses soiling public office.

    Has anyone ever claimed otherwise? And isn’t this what the kids call tu quoque? What’s her fucking point?

  14. Principal Blackman said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:57

    What is Our Lady of Perpetual Outrage taking a picture of?

  15. Righteous Bubba said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:58

    What is Our Lady of Perpetual Outrage taking a picture of?

    I dunno but I get scared when brown people take pictures near big buildings.

  16. fauxmaxbaer said,

    December 11, 2008 at 1:59

    Slightly OT, but I see that Obama is going make Malkin’s head explode by taking the oath using his full Hussein name.

  17. Tom Hilton said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:03

    Yeah, well gadjo beri bimba glandridi to you too!

  18. MzNicky said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:03

    I think Goober is referring to his whine the other day that S,N! was remaining ominously silent on the Blagojevich scandal. I may be mistaken but I think it led to the “-gate”/fence hilarity in the comments. I’d go back and look but I’m lazy, and I don’t really care.

  19. MzNicky said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:05

    fauxmaxbaer: I for one expect many heads to explode on that day. I can hardly wait.

  20. MzNicky said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:09

    Tom Hilton: And e glassala tuffm I Zimbra to you!

  21. Righteous Bubba said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:09

    BIM!

  22. Unapologetic pirate of Dr BLTunes said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:10

    Hey now. Let’s not pick on the trolls. Trolls are people too. In fact, we shouldn’t even call them disparaging names like “troll.” They should be praised for mixing things up a bit, and for preventing things from becoming too predictable.

  23. mikey said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:14

    Waitaminute. I DO require one further thing from Gavin on this topic.

    I need to know where Governer Blagojevich falls on the Stupid/Evil quadrant graph. I want to see him graphed against bush and cheney.

    Because this dood was evil the way Dr. Evil was evil, but he was stupid the way Michael Jordan played basketball.

    I’m not sure where weapons grade stupid meets cartoon evil on that graph, so I need to be shown…

    mikey

  24. Democrashield said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:15

    The problem here is simple–is Republicans think Democrats are just like them, just reversed.

    When Republican corruption is exposed, Republicans rally around their corrupt members and defend them at all costs.

    Thus, conservatives expect Democrats to do the same thing when Democratic corruption is exposed. In their minds, we Democrats have shot ourselves in the foot by harping on Republican corruption, because some Democrats are corrupt, too! Hypocrisy, etc.!

    …of course, Democrats aren’t like Republicans; we want corruption everywhere to be rooted out and prosecuted, even if those corrupt people are Democrats. In fact, eliminating corrupt Democrats is a good thing, because then we’re no longer tarnished by their corruption.

    Of course, don’t expect conservatives to pick up on that…

  25. Democrashield said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:17

    Whoops, there’s an extra “is” in that last comment–don’t worry, you can keep that free of cost.

  26. noen said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:21

    Date at the top of this article shows up as Dec 11th. Is it already tomorrow in Germany?

  27. mikey said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:24

    I never realized you people were so obsessive about the date…

    mikey

  28. Righteous Bubba said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:26

    Dating is grave business.

  29. Pere Ubu said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:30

    BIM!

    Oh, jeezus, you had me worried. For a minute I thought you meant this BIM.

  30. ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:32

    I never realized you people were so obsessive about the date…

    As opposed to the pre-date phone calls, the post-date bitterness, or …?
    ~

  31. alec said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:36

    …of course, Democrats aren’t like Republicans; we want corruption everywhere to be rooted out and prosecuted, even if those corrupt people are Democrats. In fact, eliminating corrupt Democrats is a good thing, because then we’re no longer tarnished by their corruption.

    Of course, the Republicans are also salivating over this because, were he a Republican, they know for a fact Obama would have barged screaming into Blago’s office threatening to cut him if he didn’t get some fucking baksheesh. Because being a venal little shopkeeper is all they know, they imagine everyone behaving like a venal little shopkeeper. They’ve found out that they actually leave the vicar alone with the poor box! They always knew that whole ‘charity’ thing was a scam, God helps those who help themselves (Wurzelbacher 8:8), etc.

  32. Till said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:38

    Yes. But based on the comment times, the site seems to run an hour ahead of Germany. Still on Sommerzeit?

  33. RUGGED IN MONTANA said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:41

    When is Obama going to resign as President-Elect due to his having lived in the same city as Blagajacoffowitz? We in The Heartland demand justice!!

  34. The Cat said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:42

    What depresses me more is the people who will take this as another opportunity to screech “seeee, all politicians are eeeeevil.” Yeah, sure. Most of ‘em are. And all of them are human (see John Edwards, Eliot Spitzer, Bill Clinton, etc). But it’s a lame excuse to justify apathy that I see too often.

  35. Unapologetic pirate of Dr BLTunes said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:54

    Montana is just a hop, step and a jump from Saskatchewan. That’s where I come from, and I’m proud of my mid-western roots, just as Rugged in Montana appears to be. Proud, yet, oddly, humble.

    Without the core, conservative values and common sense of the mid-west, both Canada and the United States would have imploded a long, long time ago.

  36. MzNicky said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:56

    BLT: STFU.

  37. Another Kiwi said,

    December 11, 2008 at 2:57

    Malkin looks like she thinks she’s doing something clever so she’s photo-ing something like Chimpy McFlightsuits arse or the rock David Horowitz was born under or something. The guy behind is yelling “Hey, you parked on top of my Granny, there Miss, do you mind shifting your Bradley so that the paramedics can see if she’s till alive?”
    Malkin “take a number, Jerk.”

  38. owlbear1 said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:00

    Once again all of George Bush’s policies are completely vindicated because a Democrat is being punished for corruption.

    I bet over the coming days we’ll also learn how “Selling a Senate Seat” is a far greater crime than lying to start a war or ordering torture.

  39. MzNicky said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:02

    noen: You’ve never before noticed that our Sadly hosts are on the other side of the international date line or whatever? I always have to subtract six hours (seven hours when it’s Daylight Savings Time), then decipher the military clock thing, to figure out when something was really posted in patriotic Eastern Standard Time. Inexplicably passive-aggressive timedating? Some might say so. Or perhaps they just like being ahead of the rest of us.

  40. Simba B said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:08

    MzN—I would point out that it is should be possible to convert to your local time zone by means of a Wordpress plugin or Javascript program inserted into the comment page, but given our hosts’ current technical difficulties I think I refrain…oh, wait.

  41. mikey said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:11

    Sadly HQ is just playin with KIDS.

    Smut’s down there where it’s ALWAYS tomorrow.

    Wanna know who won the big game? Wanna know who wins american idol a day early? Wanna know if you should take your umberella to work tomorrow?

    Just call smut. He’s already got tomorrow’s paper…

    mikey

  42. RUGGED IN MONTANA said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:14

    Or perhaps they just like being ahead of the rest of us.

    Thanks to Roswell technology stolen by Ernst Stravos Blofeld, they live several hours in the future, therefore bypassing the fluoride chemtrails that attract the rabid pelicans.

  43. owlbear1 said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:20

    Just think! If Blagojevich were a Republican he would be eligible for a medal .

  44. rabid pelicans™³²®© said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:30

    What’s that I smell?

  45. Righteous Bubba said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:31

    fluoride chemtrails

    I don’t understand what the Floridians get out of this.

  46. comsympinko said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:31

    OTT, but this is must-see stupidity:

    http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4569&page=0

    FP’s annual bad predictions roundup leads off with, who else, Bill the Butcher:

    “If [Hillary Clinton] gets a race against John Edwards and Barack Obama, she’s going to be the nominee. Gore is the only threat to her, then. … Barack Obama is not going to beat Hillary Clinton in a single Democratic primary. I’ll predict that right now.” —William Kristol, Fox News Sunday, Dec. 17, 2006

    If the man said “The sun will rise tomorrow,” I’d have to assume the world is ending and that the crazy guy with the signs on the corner of Church and Atlantic is right.

  47. Tommmcatt said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:37

    Without the core, conservative values and common sense of the mid-west, both Canada and the United States would have imploded a long, long time ago entered the 20th Century sometime before the 21st began.

    Fixed.

  48. Tommmcatt said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:38

    or not, depending on your HTML skilz.

  49. fdc123 said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:42

    1. just love watching alex jones yell at malkin
    2. what the hell is wrong with her chin?

  50. Megann McAlthouse said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:43

    It would be nice to have political opponents who could go one step deeper than “two wrongs make everything right” but I suppose they’d be a lot less fun if they did.

  51. Righteous Bubba said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:44

    2. what the hell is wrong with her chin?

    It’s the Chin of Fools.

  52. rabid pelicans™³²®© said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:45

    2. what the hell is wrong with her chin?

    It distends when necessary to swallow prey.

  53. comsympinko said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:52

    She’s always jutting her jaw out in provocation, indignation or, in this particular case, concentration.

    Reminds me of Bill Cowher…

  54. irrespective said,

    December 11, 2008 at 3:54

    Ack! You made me look at her throat.

    [shudder]

  55. fdc123 said,

    December 11, 2008 at 4:01

    maybe the lizard skin underneath her fake human skin is ticking nervously from being so close to alex jones. he’s onto them…

  56. Gavin M. said,

    December 11, 2008 at 4:06

    I need to know where Governer Blagojevich falls on the Stupid/Evil quadrant graph. I want to see him graphed against bush and cheney.

    Hmm, that’s a good question.

  57. stryx said,

    December 11, 2008 at 4:11

    That TPM list is a thing of beauty (the cf link at the top):

    Frank Figueroa – senior DHS official, former head of anti-sex-crime Operation Predator – pled no contest to exposing himself to 16-year-old girl in Florida mall. Girl says he fondled himself for ten minutes

    Damn. I can’t even figure out to make fun of that.

  58. mikey said,

    December 11, 2008 at 4:33

    OH, GOD HELP US!

    WHAT IS SHE DOING WITH HER FACE???

    GOD SAVE US ALL FROM THE CRUNCHED UP MALKIN FACE~!!!1111

    MIKEY

  59. RUGGED IN MONTANA said,

    December 11, 2008 at 4:35

    Girl says he fondled himself for ten minutes

    Wow! That feller has real stayin’ power!

  60. RUGGED IN MONTANA said,

    December 11, 2008 at 4:37

    WHAT IS SHE DOING WITH HER FACE???

    I’m pretty sure she’s swallowed her tongue and it’s begining to implode her face, chin first.

  61. mikey said,

    December 11, 2008 at 4:37

    I just downloaded “Boogie on Reggae Woman” and I’m pretty much out of control at this point.

    Call my neighbors and tell them to stand down…

    mikey

  62. RUGGED IN MONTANA said,

    December 11, 2008 at 4:37

    Holy cow! She tonguejacked herself!

  63. Dan Someone said,

    December 11, 2008 at 4:55

    There is some possibility that Blago is, in fact, mentally ill. I say this in all seriousness. C’mon, the guy thought that putting himself into Obama’s vacant Senate seat would rehabilitate his image for a possible ‘16 presidential run? That’s weapons-grade crazy right there.

    Also: primiti too taa nnz kkr muu?

  64. mikey said,

    December 11, 2008 at 5:10

    I once fondled a twelve inch Dobsonian reflector for six hours straight.

    But my goodness, the Ring Nebula was…Striking? Nah, there’s gotta be a better word for that level of profound…

    mikey

  65. Smut Clyde said,

    December 11, 2008 at 5:25

    Thanks to Roswell technology stolen by Ernst Stravos Blofeld,
    RIM is really Charles Stross?

  66. Another kiwi said,

    December 11, 2008 at 5:26

    An astronomical effort, Mikey.

  67. Snorghagen said,

    December 11, 2008 at 5:27

    the guy thought that putting himself into Obama’s vacant Senate seat would rehabilitate his image for a possible ‘16 presidential run?

    Blagojevich vs. Palin! That’d be a presidential campaign to remember.

  68. Smut Clyde said,

    December 11, 2008 at 5:32

    I once fondled a twelve inch Dobsonian reflector
    Is that what the ki
    SHUT UP SMUT.

  69. Smut Clyde said,

    December 11, 2008 at 5:36

    Who is this Ur Sinatra whom people keep quoting?

  70. rabid pelicans™³²®© said,

    December 11, 2008 at 5:40

    Blagojevich vs. Palin! That’d be a presidential campaign to remember.

    If not a porno video.

    Blagojevich.

    Spitzer.

    P.S. I had that tie (Spitzer’s) back in 90’s or such as.

  71. Gary Ruppert said,

    December 11, 2008 at 6:19

    The fact is, liberal bias is even more prevelent in the media than before the election. The hard left bias media ignores Obama’s ties to organized crime and Islamic Jihad. He will try to establish the Caliphate in the USA and the hard left cheers hikm on, because there fantasy of USA destroyed is coming true.

  72. Lesley said,

    December 11, 2008 at 6:21

    Glenn Reynolds’ dream date: http://www.dlisted.com/node/29696

  73. DrDick said,

    December 11, 2008 at 6:32

    I think the Malkin meltdown has begun. Facved with the fact that a scary black man with a Muslim name and a foreign father is about to become POTUS, her head has exploded and what passes for brains are oozing down her chin.

  74. Smut Clyde said,

    December 11, 2008 at 6:45

    I don’t know about Islamic Jihad, but Spitzer’s tie (as linked by rabid pelicans™³²®©) is definitely an organised crime.

  75. M. Bouffant said,

    December 11, 2008 at 7:02

    It’s chinullar cellulite, which appears on older folks when they don’t want to wear their glasses in public & have to squint to see that tiny digital display.

    Note how far away she’s holding the camera. One might think that she’s trying to shoot someone over a crowd, but she just can’t see anything that’s any closer.

  76. Me said,

    December 11, 2008 at 7:08

    [?] Two days late how?

    Please fix site. Thanx.

  77. Snorghagen said,

    December 11, 2008 at 7:08

    what the hell is wrong with her chin?

    It’s a relief map of Kyrgyzstan.

  78. Muxtressie Garth the Goat said,

    December 11, 2008 at 7:20

    It’s a relief map of Kyrgyzstan.

    CHINa. For fuck’s sake, nurse, get this man three whoopie cushions immediately.

  79. Matt T. said,

    December 11, 2008 at 7:36

    What is Our Lady of Perpetual Outrage taking a picture of?

    Either a sick, middle-class kid’s countertops or non-white people acting suspiciously, i.e. just being. You know whatever it is, it’s just something to piss her off.

  80. Matt T. said,

    December 11, 2008 at 7:38

    I mean, I’m not a picture-taking sort of guy, granted, so maybe I don’t know. You see a picture of a cat doing something cute, you take a picture. Michelle Malkin probably thinks LOLcats are secret Muslim infiltrators of something.

  81. lobbey said,

    December 11, 2008 at 8:01

    I’m from Saskatchewan

    Not something to boast about, even Albertians take the piss out of you, and that is really something.

    You’ve never before noticed that our Sadly hosts are on the other side of the international date line or whatever?

    Its part of the worldwide Judeo-Muslim conspiracy, run from the Kremlin, as part of a plan to turn us all into abortion performing serfs. Or at least that’s what those little voices in my head were telling me this morning.

  82. Smut Clyde said,

    December 11, 2008 at 8:04

    What is Our Lady of Perpetual Outrage taking a picture of?
    That’s not a camera. It’s a projector.

  83. M. Bouffant said,

    December 11, 2008 at 8:14

    Good’un by Smut there. Ha ha.

  84. Mentis Fugit said,

    December 11, 2008 at 8:18

    mikey:

    Just call smut. He’s already got tomorrow’s paper…

    No he doesn’t. I nick it out of his letterbox every morning.

    Just for the five minute quiz and the Telegraph crossword on the back page, you understand. Plus the Sudoku if it’s only rated gentle or moderate.

    I leave the front and business sections for another kiwi.

  85. irrespective said,

    December 11, 2008 at 8:27

    Kiwis?

    Don’t their turds flush counterclockwise or something?

  86. Johnny Pez said,

    December 11, 2008 at 9:05

    As one of the commenters at Balloon Juice noted, without her victimhood, Our Lady of Perpetual Outrage would just vanish in a puff of fail.

  87. Another Kiwi said,

    December 11, 2008 at 9:35

    The business section was very interesting, besides the obligatory “We’re really screwed”. Apparently our new political overlords will set us free by slavery. That’s just so Orwellian that you have to love it.

  88. Smut Clyde said,

    December 11, 2008 at 12:07

    Apparently our new political overlords will set us free by slavery.
    This is at least an improvement on the recurring business-section theme of the previous year, which was “The new stateless elite of Super-rich — New Zealand’s path to prosperity is to focus on meeting their tastes”.
    I am not making this up.
    Fortunately New Zealand’s newspapers are all owned by Australian media conglomerates anyway, and tend to fill the pages with Australian or US events anyway because apparently they can produce news more cheaply than we can locally — something to do with economies of scale — so I am not missing much.

  89. Smut Clyde said,

    December 11, 2008 at 12:09

    In other news, it turns out that you can sing “Veteran of the Psychic Wars” to the tune of “Paint it Black”. I hesitate to recommend this to anyone, but it is possible. Then they threw me out of the pub.

  90. Erik W. said,

    December 11, 2008 at 12:28

    Marie Osmond performs Hugo Ball. A classic.

  91. M. Bouffant said,

    December 11, 2008 at 12:47

    sing “Veteran of the Psychic Wars” to the tune of “Paint it Black”

    Karaoke night?
    I may try that sometime, though sensibly alone.

  92. Speakout said,

    December 11, 2008 at 14:29

    Is it just me or is your page not loading right? It’s stuck on Jackie Gingrich! Ack! Also your email contact page doesn’t work either.

  93. WereBear said,

    December 11, 2008 at 14:49

    Malkin \Mal”kin\, n. [Dim. of Maud, the proper name. Cf.
    Grimalkin.] [Written also maukin.]
    1. Originally, a kitchenmaid; a slattern. –Chaucer.

    2. A mop made of clouts, used by the kitchen servant.

    3. A scarecrow. [Prov. Eng.]

    4. (Mil.) A mop or sponge attached to a jointed staff for
    swabbing out a cannon.

  94. Gary Ruppert said,

    December 11, 2008 at 15:12

    The fact is, the faggots have too many rights already and they want more. The faggots must be stopped, they want to force the rest of us to accept them and force our children to become faggots. The Bible and the Constitution says this is wrong.

  95. Another Kiwi said,

    December 11, 2008 at 15:15

    The Gary Ruprecht machine is still not working .

  96. Simba B said,

    December 11, 2008 at 15:17

    Lazy parody troll is lazy.

  97. rabid pelicans™³²®© said,

    December 11, 2008 at 15:21

    Condors.

  98. Another Kiwi said,

    December 11, 2008 at 15:46

    The bird on the right is Condorleeza Rice isn’t it.

  99. Sadly, No! said,

    December 11, 2008 at 15:49

    Yes, I fear it is just you — or at least it loads fine for me and the contact page works. :-?

  100. atheist said,

    December 11, 2008 at 15:57

    Democrashield, December 11, 2008 at 2:15 said:

    The problem here is simple–is Republicans think Democrats are just like them, just reversed.

    “We don’t see things as they are, we see them as we are.”

    Anais Nin

  101. Lex (Palianated) Azagthoth said,

    December 11, 2008 at 16:14


    I dunno but I get scared when brown people take pictures near big buildings.

    It’s always a good opportunity to be asked, “Hey, where’re you from?” though. Heeheehee…..

  102. goober said,

    December 11, 2008 at 16:15

    [?] Two days late how?

    Gavin,

    Well, more like a day and change. I was rounding up. But you’ve had some site problems so I guess it wasn’t fair to say that. My apologies.
    I do find it interesting that, instead of writing something original, you simply link to Malkin. It’s almost as if you can’t bring yourself to post any criticism directly because Blago’s a Democrat. Even The Left’s most Obtuse Blogger©, Oliver Willis, tossed him under the bus (to his credit).

    Goober believes that the site that makes fun of right wing loons should cover news that he wants covered BECAUSE.

    “BECAUSE”? It’s the biggest story in America right now. If you’ll do a little research you’ll find that when a Republican (such as Ted Stevens) is caught in a scandal the rightwing blogs are very quick to “post and condemn”.

    ( I would’ve responded sooner, Gav, but COD: World At War online deathmatch play is quite addictive.)

  103. rabid pelicans™³²®© said,

    December 11, 2008 at 16:26

    Oh sure, booger.

    Of course we all worship Blago, because he’s a Democrat.

    Don’t ever change!

  104. MzNicky said,

    December 11, 2008 at 16:34

    “We don’t see things as they are, we see them as we are.” — Anais Nin

    Wow. I never knew she was Buddhist!

  105. Lex (Palianated) Azagthoth said,

    December 11, 2008 at 16:35

    I’ll hear no complaints about any dearth of wingnuttery dammit, there are always the fringe loonies that I haunt….heeheehee!

  106. MzNicky said,

    December 11, 2008 at 16:36

    Of course we all worship Blago, because he’s a Democrat.

    That would explain why President-elect B. HUSSEIN Obama X has called for him to resign.

  107. MzNicky said,

    December 11, 2008 at 16:38

    Smut Clyde: Regarding the speaking in tongues —

    http://everything2.com/e2node/I%2520Zimbra

  108. Rusty Shackleford (not that one) said,

    December 11, 2008 at 16:47

    Chicago’s Fox affiliate reports that Obama Chief of Staff and Chicago hometown heavy Rahm Emanuel was the catalyst for the Blago takedown and suggests Rahm-bo tipped off the feds. If so, this raises more questions than it answers…

    Rahm could clear this all up if he’d just release the vault copy of the tip-off.

  109. Simba B said,

    December 11, 2008 at 16:48

    There’s also this.

  110. Simba B said,

    December 11, 2008 at 16:48

    There’s also this: http://www.thepolice.it/testi/masokoe.htm

    Also, FYWP

  111. Simba B said,

    December 11, 2008 at 16:49

    ( I would’ve responded sooner, Gav, but COD: World At War online deathmatch play is quite addictive.)

    Unintentional irony from Sadly, No!’s most obtuse commenter©

  112. MzNicky said,

    December 11, 2008 at 16:50

    a scary black man with a Muslim name and a foreign father is about to become POTUS

    But but but, if Barry X is the illegitimate son of Malcolm X, that means he’s a US citizen. Oh dear, when retarded memes collide. What to do? Time to make up shit about Malcolm X’s true origins?

  113. chocolatepie said,

    December 11, 2008 at 16:55

    Calling mentally ill on Blago is like calling it on Captain Queeg. Maybe he’s just a stupid asshole.

    I mean, the guy dared someone to tap his phones, and then said really incriminating shit over the phone.

    He’s evil in the most sloppy, least calculating way. He doesn’t do things like threaten to cut off funds to a children’s hospital or fire journalists who disagree with him just because he hates children and newspapermen, but because he thinks he only answers to himself, and fuck everyone else, the motherfuckers!

  114. MzNicky said,

    December 11, 2008 at 17:08

    chocolatepie: I agree, the guy sounds like a total prick scumbag jerkoff who’s stupid and arrogant besides. But “evil”? I tend to reserve that description for people who think nothing of lying their country into war and then sending other people’s children off to be killed and maimed while killing and maiming other people’s children so that they themelves can reap huge amounts of money and power, sneering and laughing all the way. But petty clumsy venal self-enrichment? Not really evil.

  115. Olexicon said,

    December 11, 2008 at 17:09

    Fake Gary ruppert has lost all of his passion

  116. Scott said,

    December 11, 2008 at 17:11

    goober… isn’t very smart, is he?

  117. Rheinhard said,

    December 11, 2008 at 17:17

    For some bizarre reason, if I look at S,N! in several web browsers I don’t see any updates since Dec. 7 (Jackie **GINGRICH** Cushman). This seems to be true on my Mac at home (in Safari, Camino & Firefox) as well as on some browsers in the office on the Windoze. But I know that there are later posts because when I check using IE on my office Windoze box I see the updates, yet IE on a Windoze PC in another office doesn’t get it. I’ve cleared the cache several times and restarted and can’t seem to get the new posts.

    I see that others here are also detecting this issue. I’m glad it’s not just me, but has anyone found the bug? I also tried to report this on the contact page but every time I hit “submit” it complains that I am not allowed to access “/wordpress/” on this server. Makes it pretty impossible to report problems directly guys!!

  118. Rheinhard said,

    December 11, 2008 at 17:19

    As an additional data point, if I can get the URL for current posts via the office Internet Explorer browser, I find that if I paste them into the URL bar on the other browsers where the problem occurs I can load them. It’s only if I go to the Sadly,No! home page that it looks as if there are no post-Dec.7 posts.

  119. Simba B said,

    December 11, 2008 at 17:21

    FWIW, I have had no time-travel problems and the RSS feeds seem to be functioning as normal. I do not visit the main page (often) because I use the RSS feed, so who knows.

    Just my two cents.

  120. thesebastiancat said,

    December 11, 2008 at 17:23

    If I go to the permalink and click on each previous post’s link, (above the lead picture), I can get to the current postings.

  121. Gavin M. said,

    December 11, 2008 at 17:29

    We haven’t found the bug yet, but it seems to be a DNS propagation issue. That is, we moved to a new server, but the Internet hasn’t adjusted and keeps pointing to the old one. This is supposed to fix itself after a few days, so it’s quite weird that it’s still hapening.

  122. Coach Urban Meyer said,

    December 11, 2008 at 17:54

    Ding a ling dong dilly dally, loony libs! It’s the Cool Coach, riding high on the torrential tide of McCaniac victory, finally at long last over your precious Obummer! That’s right, we’re finally gonna take back the government from you silly socialists, and just in time, too! Seen how bad the Obummer recession has gotten? Let the Cool Coach hit ya with some knowledge:

    1) First, the Super Supremes will strike down Obummer’s ACORN-assisted FAKE victory because everyone knows he was born in Krazy Kenya! Book it!
    2) Then, he’ll be arrested for conspiring with Blagowhoosit to sell his shifty senate seat! Badoodle-boo-yeah!

    Take a big ol’ bite of my SPREAD of TRUTH, loony libs! The Obummer Regime is going down in flames even before it started! Urban out.

  123. pedestrian said,

    December 11, 2008 at 18:05

    I do find it interesting that, instead of writing something original, you simply link to Malkin.

    It is almost as though Gavin were more interesting in satirizing rightwing lunatics than in being an independent voice against the moral decay of our times. He seems to believe that this is some sort of humor blog. I take such unseriousness very very seriously.

    Brad has the right idea…

  124. another wingnut said,

    December 11, 2008 at 18:13

    mikey said:
    WHAT IS SHE DOING WITH HER FACE???

    Whatever it is, I guess Ann Coulter did the same thing only harder.

  125. tigrismus said,

    December 11, 2008 at 18:15

    Well, Coach, that was certainly a SPREAD of SOMETHING.

  126. DAS said,

    December 11, 2008 at 18:26

    There are some serious reasons though why we Democrats do need to be more concerned about corruption. For many, Democratic corruption hits closer to home (but affects our national political process). What’s the matter with Kansas? Well, perhaps Joe Kansan’s idea of liberals and Democrats in office is shaped by the heirs to the Pendergast machine in Kansas city.

    The other issue is that GOP corruption is meaningless from the point of view of the GOP’s own ideology: why does it matter if some GOoPer is corrupt? that just proves whatever the GOP says about gummint correct anyway, don’t it?

    But we Democrats claim that government can do some good. That means we need to be good at governance in order to back up our claims.

    Not only do we Democrats need to clean house in IL, but also in NJ, etc.

    OTOH, am I the only one who fails to see how, in the grand scheme of things, what Blagojovic did is so bad? I am all for throwing him under the bus and making a big deal out of demonstrating that we Dems. are for good, clean governance … but compared with the pay for play going on at all levels of government and in both parties, how is what Blagojovic did any different than what any number of politicians do all the time? Is it that Blagojovic has a funny sounding name? After all, when Blagojovic sought bribes, nobody died!

    Even still, though, even the perception that politics is just inherently corrupt is bad for the Dems as we are the ones that argue that government can do some good … “all politicians are bad” merely echoes the GOP rhetoric about teh evil big gummint. Nu? We Dems do need to clean house, etc.

  127. Rickey Hazel said,

    December 11, 2008 at 18:34

    There are some serious reasons though why we Democrats do need to be more concerned about corruption.

    I daresay Democrats should be concerned enough to prosecute people for corruption.

  128. chocolatepie said,

    December 11, 2008 at 19:52

    MzNicky:
    I probably should have put quotes around evil. I was just using the lexical field of Evil/Stupid that had been previously discussed. I also reserve that word for cruel, calculating jagoffs like Man-Sized-Safe Man.

  129. Joe Max said,

    December 11, 2008 at 19:55

    The GOP had their Randy Cunningham, and Blaggo needs to join him making license plates and routinely begging the president for a pardon.

    It’s nonsense that liberals are trying to protect Blagojovic. Randi Rhodes was screaming for his head louder than Rushblo two days ago on her radio show.

    When the Republicans have a corruption scandal, a good number of them rally to support the perp – viz. Tom Delay or the aforementioned Cunningham. Name one liberal or Democrat trying to protect Blaggo.

    I think Rahmbo ratted him out, with the approval of his boss. Good for them. They knew a shakedown was happening, and they knew someday it would come out. So they got it out now. Blagojovic just couldn’t take a fuckin’ hint when he was disinvited to Denver, so Barrack’s hit man took him down.

    That’s how they do it in Chicago.

  130. Dick Cheney said,

    December 11, 2008 at 20:12

    Yep, no doubt about it – this Blago guy is evil evil EVIL.
    Next thing you know, he’ll be shooting his friends in the face & making them apologize for it!

    Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got some chocolate-coated kittens to scarf down here.

    (OM NOM NOM NOM)

  131. Xecky Gilchrist said,

    December 11, 2008 at 20:13

    I do find it interesting that, instead of writing something original, you simply link to Malkin.

    Wow, almost verbatim from the great “Ace” meltdown at TBogg’s on 1/4/07.

  132. jim said,

    December 11, 2008 at 20:15

    Squealing about how “that motherfucker” (Obama) is crazy if he thinks he’ll pick his successor for nothing – & doing it on a phone he has to already KNOW is being tapped by the FBI?

    Only evil if you think epic stupid is a sin.

  133. Xecky Gilchrist said,

    December 11, 2008 at 20:15

    Name one liberal or Democrat trying to protect Blaggo.

    And by this, Joe Max means liberals or Democrats who exist, on Earth, as actual living humans sincerely espousing liberal views and/or belonging to the Democratic party or voting for Democrats, and not imaginary strawman liberals or people who pretend to be liberals on TV just for a conservative host to have someone to ritually humiliate.

    Just to be clear.

  134. Xecky Gilchrist said,

    December 11, 2008 at 20:17

    …um, if I may presume.

  135. Joe Max said,

    December 11, 2008 at 20:33

    Thanks for the clarification, Xecky.

    The only thing I’ve heard from any liberals as described above is carefully worded references to a fair trial and the presumption of innocence, but then, liberals do tend to support things that are in the Constitution.

  136. Je support les troops said,

    December 11, 2008 at 20:42

    I gave Michelle a pearl necklace back at Oberlin in 1989. I wonder what she ever did with it?

  137. sagra said,

    December 11, 2008 at 20:47

    Snort-worthy: Guess what big national event is taking place in Chicago this week? The 30th annual COGEL (Council on Governmental Ethics Laws) Conference.

    I wish I could get paid to snort at the news.

  138. Gavin M. said,

    December 11, 2008 at 20:48

    It is almost as though Gavin were more interesting in satirizing rightwing lunatics than in being an independent voice against the moral decay of our times.

    I like to imagine that it’s possible, with enough ingenuity, to have it both ways…

  139. MzNicky said,

    December 11, 2008 at 20:51

    chocolatepie: A graph or chart of some sort as mikey suggested earlier would be quite helpful.

  140. MzNicky said,

    December 11, 2008 at 20:53

    How unfortunate that during the current technical unpleasantness here at S,N!, the usual trolly types have managed to slither in undeterred, while many of our bretheren and sisteren have been stranded on Ms. Gingrich’s rooftop.

  141. tigrismus said,

    December 11, 2008 at 20:59

    Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got some chocolate-coated kittens to scarf down here.

    Jesus, isn’t that just typical? Way to ruin good kitten.

  142. chocolatepie said,

    December 11, 2008 at 21:30

    Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got some chocolate-coated kittens to scarf down here.

    Jesus, isn’t that just typical? Way to ruin good kitten.

    Are you sure he doesn’t mean put tiny, kitten-sized scarves on them?

  143. Smut Clyde said,

    December 11, 2008 at 21:32

    It is almost as though Gavin were more interesting in satirizing rightwing lunatics
    I’m sure he is interesting either way.
    I reckon S,N! should devote more time & energy to the burning issues of the day, i.e. the issues that happen to concern me (for instance, “How come ‘iamb’ is an iamb, and ‘trochee’ is a trochee, but ‘anapaest’ is not an anapaest?”).

  144. Righteous Bubba said,

    December 11, 2008 at 21:34

    I agree that Gavin must please Smut Clyde in various ways. And film it.

  145. sagra said,

    December 11, 2008 at 21:52

    I would like a chocolate pie chart.

  146. Another kiwi said,

    December 11, 2008 at 22:11

    I DO NOT want to see pictures of Gavin M, Smut Clyde and chocolate pie graphs. I’m old-fashioned like that.

  147. tigrismus said,

    December 11, 2008 at 22:13

    Are you sure he doesn’t mean put tiny, kitten-sized scarves on them?

    Ruined or spoiled, whichever; mark my words, he’s up to no good.

  148. Dan Someone said,

    December 12, 2008 at 0:31

    The thing about Blago daring the Feds to tap his telephone and then saying incriminating things on that phone actually does suggest a narcissistic disorder — the whole “they can’t touch me, I’m invincible” thing. I’m no psychiatrist, but I won’t be surprised if his defense eventually turns on some sort of mental illness.

  149. Strider said,

    December 12, 2008 at 1:07

    I’d still bang her.

  150. Steerpike said,

    December 12, 2008 at 2:56

    Is it just me, or does “Blagojevich” look and sound like a phonetic transcription of the act of vomiting?

  151. pedestrian said,

    December 12, 2008 at 8:53

    How come ‘iamb’ is an iamb, and ‘trochee’ is a trochee, but ‘anapaest’ is not an anapaest?

    Smut, you are a learned man and i will defer to your greater knowledge. I just have to know, am i the only one for whom iam has never been an iamb, nor trochee a trochee, but anapaest has forever and always been an anapaest?

    iambic
    trochaic
    anapaestic

    Come on, let me hear YOU say it!

  152. tigrismus said,

    December 12, 2008 at 17:19

    Trochee is a trochee, and anapaest is an anapaest, but iamb is not an iamb(at least not as it is correctly accented and currently used), spondee is not usually a spondee(though it is when I say it, since I say it wrong[I say iAMB, too, because I'm a lazy-ass cheater]), dactyl is definitely not a dactyl, usw.(though as a lazy-ass cheater, I mentally file it as “DAAHCtylos”.)

Leave a Comment

Comment Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

httpbl_stats()