13
Hey, where’s Da Troof?
Months before the election, a particularly insufferable right-wing troll who called himself The Truth told me that he couldn’t wait until America elected McCain president so he could hang out in the comments and gloat. Mysteriously, I haven’t seen him for a while. Anyone know where he is?
UPDATE: Hey Troofie, c’mon out. How bad can it be?
Republican Governors Meet, Glumly
The Republican Governors Association, meeting at a sleek hotel on Biscayne Bay to survey the damage, itself is a thinned version of what it was in the heyday of GOP dominance of national politics. There will be 21 GOP governors come January, a loss of one, and only 16 of them made the trip.
They are convinced that their counterparts in Washington are incapable of finding a formula for resurgence and that the answer lies in the states.
Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty — passed over by Sen. John McCain for the No. 2 spot on the presidential ticket and one of nine GOP governors who preside over states won by Barack Obama — offered a summary of his party’s predicament at the governors’ opening lunch.
“We cannot be a majority governing party when we essentially cannot compete in the Northeast, we are losing our ability to compete in Great Lakes states, we cannot compete on the West Coast, we are increasingly in danger of competing in the mid-Atlantic states, and the Democrats are now winning some of the Western states,” Pawlenty said. “That is not a formula for being a majority governing party in this nation.”
As if that weren’t enough, he ticked off a few more challenges.
“Similarly we cannot compete, and prevail, as a majority governing party if we have a significant deficit, as we do, with women, where we have a large deficit with Hispanics, where we have a large deficit with African American voters, where we have a large deficit with people of modest incomes and modest financial circumstances. Those are not factors that make up a formula for success going forward.”
One of the more baffling aspects of the 2008 campaign was why John McCain thought he needed to appeal to the GOP base. The GOP base are simply notorious assholes who alienate the party from blacks, Latinos and everyone living on either of the coasts. Hell, they’ve even started going after the white middle-class families whom they once claimed to champion.
This is not to say that conservatism is dead or that the Republicans will never come back. But there is a particular brand of conservative — i.e., the immigrant-bashing, torture-loving, family-stalking brand — that probably doesn’t have much of a future in American politics.
In other words, the GOP should find a new base and stick the Malkinites back into the John Birch Society hole where they belong.
N__B said,
November 13, 2008 at 13:41
He’ll be back when enough time has passed that he believes S,Ners will have forgotten all of his predictions. The Venn intersection between trolls and George Carlin’s cats: “I meant to do that. I meant to do that.”
El Cid said,
November 13, 2008 at 13:43
Da Troof? You want Da Troof? You can’t handle Da Troof!!!
LD said,
November 13, 2008 at 13:51
Haven’t you heard, he got a job as analyst in Bush new estimates and analysis team
He is responsible of giving a accurate estinamation on what Irag will be like in January, when Obama takes controll of white house.
They said his description on how Iraqis will build a 60m statue of Bush called “our beloved hero and liberator” was “very realistic´” and “most likely évent to happen in next months concerning irag.”
cschack said,
November 13, 2008 at 13:52
He’s probably hanging around APIs site, waiting for the completely-honest-and-in-no-way-a-scammer editor to release his interview with Michelle Obama, you know, the one that’s going to bring down Obama. I can’t read too many of the comments, because they make my head hurt, but from what I gather, they have rock solid evidence that Obama’s Kenyan-born, that his real name Barry Sotrero, that Michelle hates whitey, and they have also debunked the debunking of his birth certificate. In their heads.
The Tooth said,
November 13, 2008 at 13:53
The Tooth is still around.
You must remember…the tooth!
Actually, I was thinking of impersonating The Truth and telling you that Dems aren’t going to lose in 2010.
javafascist said,
November 13, 2008 at 13:58
He and Coach Urban Meyer are both waking up in a motel room in the Keys, hungover, eyes still damp with tears and wondering why they are wearing each others underwear.
Arky 4 That 1 said,
November 13, 2008 at 14:01
Oh Stimpy! I wov my new tooth!
Pastor Swank said,
November 13, 2008 at 14:03
Some conservative trolls are slowing down. Some down to nill.
It’s amazing. I wonder if the various trolls realize this of other trolls. But it is a new phenomenon.
I’m not about to psych out why this is going on. But the trolls themselves show a barren field whereas before there were trollerific crops growing—large and healthy.
Scott said,
November 13, 2008 at 14:07
The GOP troll payments unexpectedly dried up.
N.C. said,
November 13, 2008 at 14:12
He’s having some quality time with his new case of Maverick brand beverage cozies, all thanks to the McCain Trolling for Prizes initiative.
Till said,
November 13, 2008 at 14:13
Twoofy (the real one) has been around a bit, mostly nattering on about how Obama = Carter.
The Tooth said,
November 13, 2008 at 14:20
Also still around,
THE TOOT.
I don’t know exactly when that happened.
ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said,
November 13, 2008 at 14:32
He’s on a permanent pie diet.
El Cid said,
November 13, 2008 at 14:36
Clown Hall columnist finds need to mate with Todd Palin.
caliph garrett said,
November 13, 2008 at 14:45
My favorite right wing troll (the truly moronic AuggysBack) completely yanked his “blog” the day after the election. For all the attention I gave his incompetent, dyslexic rantings, he didn’t even extend me the courtesy of a forwarding address, the fuckwit.
His ceaseless devotion to verbatim reprints of Breit Bart, WND, Rush and whatever chain email crossed his path, plus his own misbegotten political analyses, provided endless amusement for me over the last two years.
In his words, the GOP would “three-peat” this year. I think the racist shithead really believed it.
Arky 4 That 1 said,
November 13, 2008 at 14:54
More like Clown Hall columnist drools out apology for the fact TPalin isn’t the governor of Alaska and wasn’t running for Veep. But yours is funnier.
In a very disturbing sort of way.
javafascist said,
November 13, 2008 at 14:55
El Cid, that link was just a couple of saxophone notes short of a porn film. Somebody should introduce her to Kim du Toit to fill her manly man need.
DJ said,
November 13, 2008 at 14:57
Auggy surfaces occasionally at Atrios’s place, where he is rhetorically beaten into a greasy smear by the regulars there. Right now, I think the gutless punk is in despair due to the mediocre showing of his favorite NFL team, the Jacksonville Jaguars.
(Lex) Palianated (Azagthoth) said,
November 13, 2008 at 15:09
Da Troof was here a few threads ago claiming that Bush has kept us safe since “Obama” hit us; it was just classic.
bulbul said,
November 13, 2008 at 15:18
El Cid,
oh sweet Jesus. And of course she had to bring up that piece of stinking excrement “I’m Still a Guy” by Brad Paisley. I wish Johnny Cash were alive to show that asshole what a real guy looks like.
FMguru said,
November 13, 2008 at 15:44
“We cannot be a majority governing party when we essentially cannot compete in the Northeast”
After thirty years of hearing about how thesouththesouththesouth was the fulcrum of American politics and how the Democrats were dooooomed if they didn’t find a way to appeal to Jethro Q. Nascar, reading that was like waking up in Bizarro World.
I’m having a hard time imagining how a party that’s been stripped to its Southern base (along with a handful of desolate, militia-ridden Plains and Western states) is going to be able to retool itself to win in the Northeast and along the coasts. I haven’t quite bought into the notion that the GOP is looking at a long stint in the wilderness. I remember how just a few years ago it was the Dems looking bleakly at a Permanent Republican Majority, and the last couple of Republican defeats – Clinton’s election in 1992 and the failure of impeachment in 1998 – were followed by quick recoveries (Gingrich in 1994, Dubya in 2000). But I’m starting to come around.
kiki said,
November 13, 2008 at 15:54
He reacted to the constant taunting about his NostraDumbAss election predictions by informing us that, oh infinite fucking joy and surprise, he will be around for the next four years telling us how the Dems will lose in 2012.
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 15:56
Bush’s policies have prevented further terrorist attacks, and asking why you don’t give him credit for that
Hey, Pravda -
you still haven’t commented yourself on the anthrax mailings or all the times Bush has taken some two-bit terror-wanna-be plot (Fort Dix, the Space Needle, the “liquid bomb” thing) and blown it up into some great massive success, while everyone quietly admits a few weeks later that there was nothing to it in the first place. As well as all the times Ridge’s Terror Rainbow was raised to “orange” back in 2003-2004, motivated more by political concerns than by real threats. Or how Bush failed to keep the citizens of New Orleans safe, except that wasn’t a terrorist thing so I guess it doesn’t count. Or encouraging Iraqis to attack American troops.
Or, you know, ignoring the goddamn August 6th PDB in the first place. But hey – he’s kept us “safe” since then, apart from the disintegrating bridges and toxin-soaked toys and E. Coli-infected meat and all that. So I guess, yeah, he should get a mulligan on 3000 dead.
Not.
Svensker said,
November 13, 2008 at 15:56
Changing the subject a tad, but isn’t it amazing how Gov. Pawlenty speaks in full sentences that have actual meaning and are grammatically correct? Nothing loony in the sentences either. I predict he’s not long for the GOP.
InsaneInTheCheneyBrain said,
November 13, 2008 at 15:57
See here now, when Bush fucks up a country, he fucks it up but GOOD.
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 15:59
Oh, and look – from breaking news over at CNN:
First-time unemployment claims rose to 516,000 last week, the most since September 2001.
Whee! But at least those people don’t have to worry about the Islamomooslibolshifascitos flying airplanes into the buildings where they no longer work.
NobodySpecial said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:07
I haven’t quite bought into the notion that the GOP is looking at a long stint in the wilderness. I remember how just a few years ago it was the Dems looking bleakly at a Permanent Republican Majority, and the last couple of Republican defeats – Clinton’s election in 1992 and the failure of impeachment in 1998 – were followed by quick recoveries (Gingrich in 1994, Dubya in 2000). But I’m starting to come around.
The GOP is like a electical cord with a bend in it. As time’s gone on, all the jiggling they do with it works for a shorter and shorter time while the wire inside breaks more. Right now, they’re at the point where they’ve got the cord bent double and taped to the plug and trying to keep the cord in JUST SUCH A POSITION or else it’ll go pfluey.
And I’m all for Sarah Palin’s attempts to kick the plug out of the socket.
fauxmaxbaer said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:07
“Similarly we cannot compete, and prevail, as a majority governing party if we have a significant deficit, as we do, with women, where we have a large deficit with Hispanics, where we have a large deficit with African American voters, where we have a large deficit with people of modest incomes and modest financial circumstances. Those are not factors that make up a formula for success going forward.”
Don’t forget the most important deficit with young voters who may remain in the Democratic fold for years to come. Anything to help!
The Boothe said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:13
Sic semper troll-ranis!
MzNicky said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:19
Doesn’t this pie-eating troll owe somebody here $300?
(Lex) Palianated (Azagthoth) said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:25
Mz–I’ll take it.
MzNicky said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:30
(L)P(A): No really. Seems like Smut Clyde or someone made a $300 bet with “Truthless” on Election Nite and of course the troll was wrong. And now apparently is a bet welcher. How not surprising.
kiki said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:35
Actually MzNicky, I think it’s original-flavour RiM that is the welcher.
Not that there’s a fart’s chance in hell that Truthy would’ve paid up if it was him that made the bet, as evidenced by his stalwart refusal to even address how loudly, proudly and stunningly WRONG he was about the election.
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:35
That was Rugged – not the funny one, the boring one. He then claimed it was the parody who made the bet and made himself scarce.
mat said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:37
Adios, conservative kooks!
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:38
And it was Ed Marshall, not Smut. O Google, what would I do without you?
PapaJijo said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:38
Pawlenty’s speech just reaffirms my view that the Democratic party has become the party of problem-solvers, while the Republican party has become the party of marketing execs with nothing to sell.
Our leaders have been (rather timidly in the past, but more aggressively now) trying to show everyone, everywhere that our ideas are simply better. But Republicans are still trying to break down the population into marketing demographics, and will probably have discussions over the next few years that boil down to “How can we persuade female Hispanics in the midwest to buy our shitty, shitty products?”
MzNicky said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:41
Oh! Well, then, that’s different. Nevermind.
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:46
It’s easy to get the trolls confused: they’re all boring and all share a deep, abiding passion for fruit-filled pastry items.
GSD said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:47
Ah the wingnuts.
I am reminded of the white supremacist map of their ideal America. They ceded most of the south to the blacks as well as NY….to be split up with the Jews.
They have the west coast and the southwest to the Latinos.
They chose the lily white redoubts in the upper northwest but failed to secure a single seaside port for their commerce.
Always thinking.
-GSD
(Lex) Palianated (Azagthoth) said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:54
Ahhhh, I see. Maybe he should just go out and try to appeal to the GOP base for now.
Gerri Ruppert said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:56
What’s left of them. I don’t think depending on the least common demonimator is a winning strategy.
Susan of Texas said,
November 13, 2008 at 16:56
Poop
Righteous Bubba said,
November 13, 2008 at 17:09
When you’ve got the hosts posting about you you have to give the Truth an A for trolling.
Austin Danger Powers said,
November 13, 2008 at 17:16
Now that your here, what’s the fucking surprise?
Susan of Texas said,
November 13, 2008 at 17:22
Eight years of Bush, and all we got was a lousy troll.
Sarcastro said,
November 13, 2008 at 17:23
I’ve just been pointing out to you liberals how my tiger-repelling rock prevented further tiger attacks, and asking why you don’t give it credit for that.
Susan of Texas said,
November 13, 2008 at 17:24
My family has been protecting the planet from the aliens of Alpha Centauri for thousands of years. We have costumes and superpowers and everything.
You’re welcome.
(Lex) Palianated (Azagthoth) said,
November 13, 2008 at 17:25
Awww Bubba, don’t give it that kind of credit…..
Athenawise said,
November 13, 2008 at 17:29
The governors were so glum, they sprung for hookers and pizza.
kefauver said,
November 13, 2008 at 17:39
Nope. “The Truth” is still dropping little shit sandwiches in the comments sections. I don’t think you’ll be rid of him, he’s like a bad case of VD.
Djur said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:03
Why do you want the poor woman to be crushed?
DrDick said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:10
Troofie is suffering from a severely impacted colon as a result of his head being shoved so far up there when Obama won and it exploded.
Loneoak said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:11
My guesses regarding The Truth’s whereabouts:
1) He got eaten by Josh St. Lawrence’s sasquatch.
2) His face was ripped off by Lonny’s FUCHING FERRETS
3) MidwestSecurityMom’s husband shot his balls off for boning that crazy woman
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:19
I think we should set higher standards for trollery: trolls should either be funny or post in sestina form to receive attention. Preferably both.
protected static said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:36
In other news, a Swankalike is writing letters to Jefferey Goldberg @ The Atlantic:
Swanktastic! Homo-nup Arab womb babies for everyone!
Mr. Merle said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:39
Righteous: That’s more a comment on the hosts, really.
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:46
I asked you about what you would think about Jena if the races were reversed.
You must also inform us of what would happen if pigs had wings, and if a bear was discovered that DIDN’T shit in the woods.
Enquiring minds want to know!
Lolly said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:47
But Republicans are still trying to break down the population into marketing demographics, and will probably have discussions over the next few years that boil down to “How can we persuade female Hispanics in the midwest to buy our shitty, shitty products?”
That’s it, in a nutshell. And they’re advertising techniques for their products are getting increasingly stale–it’s more like “How can we persuade those female Hispanics to be so afraid of something imaginary that they will vote for us to protect them?”
I’m guessing that no one at this conference offered the only advice that could really help them: Stop being ignorant, batshit crazy bigots if you want people to vote for you.
Lolly said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:48
Ah–they’re, their, there–what’s the diff?
A Poor Pitiful Obsessive Compulsive Sufferer said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:48
Can you please post something wherein the main point of the article isn’t immediately disprovable? Something like… this?
It is not going to happen, liberals. Your echo chamber is reverberating now with your shouts of victory before you’ve won a single state. I almost feel badly for you, because when McCain wins, your astonishment will be overwhelming. I say “almost” because your ideology is nasty, anti-free speech, and absolutist, and every decent person will sigh in relief when it goes down to defeat once more.
Here is how it will go down next week. First, the results from Virginia and North Carolina will come in, and they’ll be declared for McCain. You’ll be disappointed, but “no big deal, change can’t come overnight” will be your comment. Florida will go red, and a little nervousness will creep in. The usual suspects will fall into the usual categories. As the night drags on, Ohio, Colorado, and (much to your horror) Pennsylvania will be too close to call.
My advice at this point to you will be to go to bed. You will wake up to a McCain presidency and the Great Liberal Freakout will be on.
Bookmark this, liberals, as this is exactly how it is going to go down. You will be wonder how the hell I was able to call this.
Disprove THAT, Liberals! Oh no … wait…
Quick! Look over there! It’s a very sad, obsessive man-child promising to spend the next 4 years being obnoxious because he doesn’t know how to be loved! Laugh at him, not meeeee!
Except… Oh No again!
sagra said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:51
Is it just me, or do the governors (other than Palin) seem less wingnutty than your average Puke?
alec said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:56
If a group of black students who socially dominated a local Alabama high school – and whose parents and grandparents had done the same, forming an unbreakable good-ol-boy network through which these teenagers essentially made their childish whims law – taunted and excluded a smaller group of black students until the egregiousness of the situation forced the school to take the least action possible, and the black students proceeded to hang nooses around in order to remind the white students and their parents of how, had it been twenty years earlier, the overpowering domination of black society would have translated not into bureaucratic difficulty but Lynch’s Law?
And if those white students, pushed by this course of events far beyond any reasonable breaking point, wound up getting into a minor physical altercation with the black elite over what amounted to an implied murder threat – and the school and police authorities, in defiance of the state’s zero-tolerance policy and the general direction of civil rights law (intended to reduce the number of situations in which politically and socially abusive local blacks could abuse poorer, less politically entrenched whites, who between centuries of slavery to the black cotton economy and over a century after that of debt-slavery to black-owned truck farms and almost a century of exclusion under Joe Swan laws had extremely little in the way of resources to defend themselves), let the black youths off with an obviously forced warning and had the white youths charged with attempted murder?
I would think extremely little of the blacks in that situation, but for some reason I don’t think that’s what you thought you were asking.
Gary Ruppert said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:58
Sarah Palin and John McCain won the election by any legitimate standard. If Palin (and McCain) had been as bitter and selfish as Al Gore, she would have pursued a recount, but she didn’t want the country to be torn apart by the inevitable riots when The One’s urban supporters learned that he lost.
The fact is, without the 8,500,000 fraudulant votes cast by ACORN and their goons from Disneyland, Sarah Palin would be shopping for an inauguration dress right now.
Brad said,
November 13, 2008 at 18:59
Troofie, you’ve just been proven wrong about everything. Obama won 365 electoral votes. Count ‘em, chump. 365. That’s more than Bush won in either 2000 or 2004. Obama won in former GOP strongholds such as Indiana, Virginia and North Carolina. And he did it largely by trashing your favorite president, George W. Bush.
How does it feel to be so hilariously wrong?
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:04
> The fact is, without the 8,500,000 fraudulant votes cast by ACORN and their goons from Disneyland, Sarah Palin would be shopping for an inauguration dress right now.
That would amount to a Federal Bailout of those down-home farmboy salesmen at Nieman Marcus.
Da Troofiocity said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:04
Yo homes, I still be here all up in your ‘grizzle,’ I’se just be hidin’ out clebberly wife my Tec-9 until de fret of da black planet be passed. An shit.
A Poor Pitiful Obsessive Compulsive Sufferer said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:04
All Work And No DrDick Makes The Truth A Dull Boy
All Work And No DrDick Makes The Truth A Dull Boy
All Work And No DrDick Makes The Truth A Dull Boy
All Work And No DrDick Makes The Truth A Dull Boy
All Work And No DrDick Makes The Truth A Dull Boy
All Work And No DrDick Makes The Truth A Dull Boy…
… Doctor, about my dick, there’s something on my dick, doctor… Bookmark this Liberals, because this is how DrDick goes down on me, in my dreams…
dick doctored the documents that dicklined to show that vice president Dick was born to a doctor in kenya… you know, everyone who criticizes me must be DrDick… dick dick Dick I say!
Please… someone help me, before I dick again…
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:05
> How does it feel to be so hilariously wrong?
I have my fingers in my ears. I cannnnnnn’t hear you!
Anonymous said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:09
Bush has kept us safe? Have you ever heard a more egregious abuse of post hoc, ergo propter hoc in your life?
Fact: McCain lost – when you said he’d win.
Fact: Bush can be no more proven to have protected the country from Islamic extremists than he can be proven to have prevented alien invasion. Might as well discuss angels and pins.
Fact: Obama won by larger margins than Bush in either election, in either the electoral college or the popular vote.
Brad said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:11
Troofie – yes we should all thank Bush for not getting us killed. Now that’s the mark of a successful preznit!
A Poor Pitiful Obsessive Compulsive Sufferer said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:12
Besides, I want to hear from our Cowardly Expert, DrDick.
Ooops, I dick’d it again…
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:14
Haven’t you heard, he got a job as analist
Fixed yer post.
Disney Pixar Sucks said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:14
I can just imagine what the Republican Governors meeting is like. In order to get in you have to walk into a damp dark basement, empty bags of cheetos and cans of mountain dew littering the concrete basement floor, producing an eiry crunch as they are trod underfoot. The smell of farts in the air, in the darkness as you approach closer to the meeting area, you hear the sound of laughter, and suddenly you realize what is going on. The Republican governors are all in hysterical laughter from one of Jonah Goldbergs fart lighting escapades.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:15
Some kid got the shit kicked out of him because he was white. The perpetrators of this violence were predicate felons.
I concur. The white kids who hung the nooses and inflamed the attacks should be strung up like the cracker racist thugs they are.
Questions?
I didn’t think so.
kefauver said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:15
Oh no, I can’t tell the fake Gary Rupperts apart from the real Gary Ruppert.
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:16
Some kid got the shit kicked out of him because he was white.
SEE SEE BLACK PEOPLE CAN BE RACIST TOO THEREFORE EVERYTHING YOU KNOW IS WRONG QED HAHAHA!!11
Don’t you have hubcaps to be stealing or something, Pravda?
N.C. said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:16
What does The Truth do for a living? Does it involve a lot of lawn-mowing, like that one troll from a while back?
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:16
An earlier post mocked a pundit praising Bush for keeping terrorists from our shores.
Jesus hasn’t returned on Bush’s watch. Therefore, by your feeble logic, Bush is the Anti-Christ.
Questions?
I didn’t think so.
McE said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:22
While we’re thanking Bush for there not being another attack on us, I’d also like to thank him for the following:
I haven’t been eaten by sharks
I haven’t been struck by lightening.
I haven’t been abducted by aliens.
I haven’t been kidnapped by a satanic cult bent on using me as a sacrifice to their dread lord.
I haven’t been stuck by a meteor.
I haven’t fallen into a vat of radioactive waste and transformed into a supervillian.
I haven’t been attack by zombies, evil robots or giant lizards.
I haven’t had my head exploded by terrorist telekineticists.
I’m sure there’s more to be thankful that out great (no, GREATEST) leader has done for us that hasn’t happened.
Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to go thank my wife for bringing the car back in one piece, just like I do everyday she doesn’t wreck the car.
WereBear said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:28
If I were a known maniac psycho who killed people with pinking shears, and, in a dispute with a neighbor, I hung pinking shears from their front door, would that constitute a threat?
Sockpuppet #47 said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:28
This Jena shit.. The reichtards never seem to realise it isn’t about who is a thug, or which one of those kids was a racist twat… It is about the institutional racism in the police force which lead to a group of children, guilty of common assault, to be charged as adults, with attempted murder.
When the people in charge of enforcing the law do not follow the law themselves, this is a bad thing for society.
Fucking simple innit? But noooo… those fucking racist niggers are putting the blame on some poor innocent white folk again.
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:33
I’d like to thank this inert carbon rod from keeping the Earth safe from invasions by body-stealing pods, hamster-eating deceptively freindly lizard people, and from being occupied by sulfur-dioxide breathing squid aliens from Orion who would transform our air into the poisonous soup they breathe.
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:34
I haven’t fallen into a vat of radioactive waste and transformed into a supervillian.
You say that like it’d be a bad thing.
stackozone said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:35
Truthie’s not pinin’! ‘E’s passed on! This truthie is no more! He has ceased to be! Truthie’s expired and gone to meet ‘is maker! ‘E’s stiff! Bereft of life, ‘e rests in peace! If you hadn’t nailed ‘im to the barn door ‘e’d be pushing up the daisies! ‘Is metabolic and cognitive processes are now ‘istory! ‘E’s off the reservation! ‘E’s kicked the bucket, ‘e’s shuffled off ‘is moronic coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin’ wingnut choir invisibile!!
sagra said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:35
According to the gal who is drooling over Todd Palin, all it takes for a song to be “politically incorrect” is for it to mention that fellers like ta hunt n’ fish moar then wimminfolks.
I swear, 90% of the popularity of country music is the mistaken idea that it pisses off liberals. If we all slapped “I <3 Toby Keith” bumper stickers on our Priuses, the whole genre would die out in five years.
Loneoak said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:37
The perpetrators of this violence were predicate felons.
I’ll see your predicate felons and raise you a nominal felon.
Inigo Montoya said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:39
Predicate…hey Troofie? I do not think that word means what you think it means.
Candy said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:39
Curse that horrible Bush for foiling my plans for supervillianhood! I also haven’t won the Powerball these last eight years. Coincidence? I think not!
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:44
Bush did a great job keeping us safe from terrorists post-9/11, unless you happened to be standing in line for an El Al flight at LAX on July 4, 2002, or one of the people who was affected by the anthrax attacks, or a worker at the US Consulate in India, or at an abortion clinic…the list goes on…
dan b said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:44
That has absolutely nothing to do with anything in the context of the discussion about Jena. Completely irrelevant.
Susan of Texas said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:45
The hatred of teachers, the dishonest attempts to create culture wars, the stupidity, the feeble attempts at bullying–Jonah Goldberg is back!
Hey Jonah–aren’t you supposed to be writing an article on the intellectual justification for stepping on a crack and breaking your mother’s back?
Just in case you didn’t notice, Jonah, your idiotic arguments only work on people who can’t reason. You know, your base.
Marco said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:46
“Where has he run off to?” The Truth
I dunno. Maybe he went to go get that Democratic voter fraud report from Wisconsin – you know that one, right? It’s the one you refuse to produce.
I know asking conservatives to bring actual proof to the table to back up their asinine accusations is asking a lot, but one day one may be up to the task.
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:48
> I haven’t been attack by zombies, evil robots or giant lizards.
Wait a minute. I’m not going to give chimpo any credit AT ALL.
I was attacked by an evil robot on May 4, 2006.
Susan of Texas said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:49
What does that have to do with official oppression, the issue at the heart of the case?
Nothing.
Go ahead and change the subject every time you lose, Truth. It means you won!!!!
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:50
TheTruth seems to be using the infamous Chewbacca Defense.
dBa said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:50
Don’t feel sorry for me, I’m happy. Did you hear the one about how the conservative movement died?
That one cracks me up.
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:50
> What does that have to do with official oppression, the issue at the heart of the case?
No, no, it PROVES he is right!
You see, the police had special soothsaying equipment and KNEW that those kids would get in trouble in the future.
Thus, it was their duty to put them away.
dan b said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:55
Judging by Troofie’s little treatise on predicate felonies up there, I’m gonna go ahead and safely assume Troof is either:
a) not a lawyer; or
b) the worst lawyer in the world.
Susan of Texas said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:57
Eh, who needs knowledge when you have an endless supply of Red Bull, The National Review and an Ann Coulter blow-up dolls, “now with real hair”!
Candy said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:57
Truth, you keep blathering about that kid being hospitalized, and it’s simply not true; at least, he did go to the ER, but he certainly wasn’t admitted. He was at some sort of party or school event that same night, IIRC. I’m not saying that it’s okay to resort to violence, but it’s not okay to exaggerate to make it sound like your racist little bigot boy was beaten half to death, either.
I shall consult Teh Great Gazoogle.
Hmmm . . . yep. Also, the tennis shoes the black kid was wearing were considered a “dangerous weapon” by the prosecutor for the purposes of the battery charges filed. Jena 6 account per Snopes
Get your facts straight.
Susan of Texas said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:59
Damn that Michael Jordan, designing Weapons of Mass Destruction and selling them to American teens.
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:00
Oooh, misdemeanor violations!
Thank god those madmen are off the streets!
Malfunctioning The Truth Robot said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:02
McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?McCain will win in a landslideWhat about the Jena Six, HUH?!?jim said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:02
Good going there, dude – now you’ll NEVER get rid of that Trout-smell.
Herr Trout’s output is a mere fraction of what it used to be – & the total Troutlessness of many recent threads is testimony to the simple fact that the wee gobshite knows just how epically he pwned himself, loudly & often, leading up to November’s curbstomping of the GOP (so please remind him of it at every possible opportunity), & all the oblique & arrogant blithering about Obama=Carter, Byrd or the Jena 6 it takes to pave hell won’t wash that nasty taint of “Hardcore Fail #5″ off him – easily supported point #1.
People in Manhattan likely aren’t nearly as impressed as he is by Bush’s terrorism-smashin’ batting-average since 2001, due to a whole bunch of them getting a terminal case of Bush Derangement Syndrome, the kind where Bush was too fucking deranged not to keep taking vacations while his country was being threatened with a major terrorist attack, thus being Bin Laden’s BFF yet again, such that a lot of them wound up becoming worm-food (& let’s not forget that bogus “All Clear” from Bush’s crony-packed EPA, who damn well knew better but chose to be good little soldiers for Great Leader, sending New Yorkers back to their dusty offices when Manhattan’s air was a deadly carcinogenic stew, leading to who knows how many additional needless deaths down the road) – easily supported point #2.
I’d like to see Herr Trout say that he was wrong about the election, & promise not to come back here until he’s got something relevant &/or entertaining to say – but the requisite cojones &/or fleeting contact with fundamental reality seem sadly lacking in this one.
Might I cordially suggest that Herr Trout find another sandbox to drop his steaming Logs O’ Wisdom in – one not yet contaminated by his own lousy – & easily proveable – record of consistently Doing It Wrong? Otherwise he risks the sad fate of Sir Gary Of Ruppertia: slowly beaten down by yet more Epic Fail from his own stubby pinkies until finally he winds up quietly slithering away in shame, replaced by parody-clones, with almost no-one noticing the difference – or giving a shit.
I Pity The Fool said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:05
Judging by Troofie’s little treatise on predicate felonies up there, I’m gonna go ahead and safely assume Troof is either:
a) not a lawyer; or
b) the worst lawyer in the world.
Wait a sec…consistently wrong on every subject that he blathers on about…lots of free time to troll Teh Sadly comment threads…worst lawyer in the world…GLENN REYNOLDS?!?!?!
dan b said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:08
I was gonna go with Hindrocket but I suppose we can speculate about it all day.
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:09
Thank god those madmen are off the streets!
Sadly, the black market in illegal tennis shoe sales continues apace. I’ve read that people can buy tennis shoes at special “shoe fairs” at which little or no care is taken to make sure shoes are being sold to upstanding citizens with no criminal shoe-crime convictions, leading to the transport of thousands of pairs of unregistered shoes across state lines into areas where shoe control laws are stronger.
Sockpuppet #47 said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:10
No no.. Worst lawyer in the world.. Why, that would have to be young Ben, the former “worst law student in the world” of course!
National Sneaker Association said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:11
The Second Ammendment guarentees us the right to wear sneakers, you commie!
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:12
Time passes… still no Dr. Dick! And Brad has yet to back away from his claim that I predicted a McCain win.
You liberals just wodjsnss eejowq……………..pe…
Hold on
OMG
I did say that I did claim that McCain
Fuck, those are my words and they’re all so obviously wrong. Provably. Demonstrably. Totally. Shit I mean; fuck
Still. I’m not wrong about Jena. I’m pretty certain that
shit what if i’m wrogn about hold on I’ll get back to you
I’m right about Bush stopping a terrorist attack that could have happened because
I need to think
I’m goign,im goinh to lie dow lie down you libss
you dont understand ordinaryamericans; liberals,clinton aclu The ACLU! HusseinJAnet Reno
DukakisUNITAregan regansocial security TheSECOND AMENDMENT! you liberals vitenam vietnam PowSovietaggression right to carry gaymariage it’s about
it’sa about vitenam no its about BILL AYERS the associations the associations scarychi chicago
You liberals Jena George Cloony jihas jihad Hamas endrosement Grat Society taxes medicae
entitlements
entitlements
entitlements too many entitlements
Oliver North I love Oliver North I love Oliver North I love Oliver North he is a oatriot her alright hes alriught he stood up
OMG I can hear them again can you hear them can you hear them? Shut up Shut up Shut up! We’re maming progress in Iraq New Orleans had a democrat mayor
Southern Beale said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:12
Fear no, Republicans! Sarah Palin will save you!
Mwaaaaahaaaaahaaaaahaaaa!!!!!
Southern Beale said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:12
Er, Fear NOT.
Crap.
Candy said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:15
Worst lawyer in the world . . . are we sure Truthie is a male? Maybe Truth is Annie Outhouse or Little Debbie Snackcakes.
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:16
Note how the subject has been neatly moved from Bush’s heroic post-9/11 defending of the country from the evil turrists (did you know he personally bested Osama bin Laden in hand-to-hand combat and snapped his neck, but hasn’t told the public because he’s too modest?) to the criminal charges faced by one of the mothers of the Jena 6 (TheTruth seems to fancy himself quite the legal eagle, but apparently he never heard about “innocent until proven guilty” in law school). Oh well, I guess talking about the Failure-In-Chief doesn’t sustain the ephemeral erections of wingnut trolls as much as telling us S’Ners how violent and criminal all those darkies who sent Hussein X to the White House are.
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:20
The Second Ammendment guarentees us the right to wear sneakers, you commie!
It says SHOES, and it means for self-defense(e.g. stubbed toes, hookworm, tetanus, etc.); the government has the right, nay, the responsibility, to be involved when the shoes have no defensive purpose, such as those ridiculous barefoot sandals. People who wear those are MONSTERS.
Candy said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:20
See, I think this is one of the fundamental misconceptions of this case. Why do you think the victim of the Jena 6 thugs was a bigot?
Because, according to witnesses, the reason he got his ass kicked was he’d been taunting the black kids with racial epithets since the noose incident. Generally, that indicates at least a modicum of bigotry, yes?
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:21
I suppose we can speculate about it all day.
It would be irresponsible not to.
dan b said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:22
Good lord I forgot that woman is an attorney.
Susan of Texas said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:22
Oh, Jonah. Silly, silly Jonah. Do you reason with a puppy who poops on the rug, or do you wrinkle your nose, clean up after it, and scoot its little butt outside until it becomes housebroken?
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:22
Shoes for Industry, compadres!
You holding?
Susan of Texas said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:24
It keeps itself busy because when it slows down it remembers the failures and tragedy, and it is ashamed.
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:25
TheTruth wrote: “Oh, and as for the rest of you, I’m still waiting for you to tell me why I’m wrong about Jena or Bush or… well, anything. Insults are fun, imitation isflattering, but as for rebuffing me on the facts? Sadly, no.”
And as for you actually bothering to read the thread? Also a “sadly, no.” At 19:44 I pointed out 4 notable instances of terrorist attacks that occurred on US soil post-9/11, but you just ignored them like you ignore everything else that demonstrates how far you have your head shoved up your ass. I hope you’re close to shooting your wad or getting whatever it is you get out of coming here and being proved wrong over and over again, because this is getting boring. I suggest you go over to 4chan or another /b/ site and get some tips on your trolling.
Gary Ruppert said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:28
“Insults are fun, imitation isflattering, but as for rebuffing me on the facts? Sadly, no.”
The fact is, Mr. Truth, you predicted a McCain win and claimed it as an insight into political reality rather than an aspiration or a wish. You expected others to wonder why you were right but have chosen not to address in good faith the fact that you were clearly wrong.
Goodness, your attempt to change the subject is even irritating to me and I’m on your side, sir.
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:31
His arguments are more slippery than the floor of a toilet stall Larry Craig’s been using. Watch how Candy says the kid was a bigot, TheTruth asks why, and when she tells him, it immediately changes from a case of whether or not the kid was a bigot to a case of Candy saying that hate speech justifies assault. You seem to be a fan of legal terms, maybe you’re familiar with “straw man”?
owlbear1 said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:33
#
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:22
Free tongue jacking services available
Righteous Bubba said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:33
Terrorism. Shouted “Allah akhbar” and everything.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beltway_sniper_attacks
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:35
Shhhh, Righteous Bubba! Didn’t you read the thread? None of us could “rebuff him on the facts” of how wrong he was about W and McCain, so now we’re talking about the Jena 6 and how violent black people are.
Rogered in Montana said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:36
Yeah, what Gary said.
Susan of Texas said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:37
It’s a mighty tough way to make a living–trolling websites for abuse, just to get a little attention. I hope it’s having a good time, because otherwise I’d feel guilty. Now that Obama is president-elect I have less fear and more hope in my heart, and can let it start over fresh if it wants to make friends.
Candy said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:37
Good lord I forgot that woman is an attorney.
Terrifying isn’t it? I believe she’s actually practising as opposed to just misinforming law students.
Rogered in Montana said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:39
And what does Jenna Bush have to do with black people anyway? If she tried dating one, her grandma would slap her into the middle of next week.
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:39
To my oh-so-funny imitators, I answer with the facts, and (cliche as it is) the truth.
When are you liberals going to acknowledge that I was simply right about the election?
Spot on, actually.
McCain clearly did win in Indiana, Virginia, Ohio, North Carolina, Florida and Pennsylvania. He is the President-elect, and your next Commander-in-Chief.
The MSM are so in the tank for Obama they’re actually claiming he won the election.
Care to refute my claim, sadlynauts?
I can even offer a link show the vote count in Virginia and Ohion right here showing that the Republicans won.
It’s going to be an interesting four years with liberals actually claiming that they are in government. Happily, no.
Candy said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:39
Hadn’t heard that one, Candy – appreciate a link.
See the link I already posted, dumb ass.
Jay B. said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:41
Shorter rightwing guy (for now and forever): The problems of five little people in this world mean more to me than the deaths of hundreds of thousands do. They have to, for me to make any sense of this crazy world I voted for and supported like a drooling hick all these years. Sure, th world economy may be in the shitter and endless wars may be the legacy of they guy whose balls I’d love to lick clean each and every morning and America is a far worse place now than it was when i whined incessantly about the previous guy. And I know there’ll be problems each and every day because of the idiot cockup who I lovingly and knowingly lied for while trying to look butch about it…but we’ll always have Jena.
Susan of Texas said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:42
fake
Anthony said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:45
Does anyone have the sneaking suspision that there is no truth. That we all are just fake posting as him and unknowingly responding to other’s fake posts. Because I know I’ve fake posted as him and now I wonder if he’s some meta creation of our collective imagination. That would be cool.
Glum, Bleak, and Desolate, LLC™³²®© said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:48
Hello, Republican Governors!
Gustave Flaubert™³²®© said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:53
There is no truth.
Candy said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:54
I dunno, Truth is stranger than fiction . . .
MzNicky said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:54
Lawsa-mercy, look here. Pie pie everywhere, and not a thought to think.
Anyone else get the feeling we’re just treading water here until Inauguration Day? What, no wingnutz out there uttering risible statements? Or have they all offed themselves in shame and despair?
Star Trek said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:55
Is There In Truth No Beauty?”
MzNicky said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:57
Thank you, Mr. Flaubert. I’ve been trying to tell Mr. Truth all along that objectively he does not exist. Yet some still cling stubbornly to that delusion.
dan b said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:58
I have a cousin in Pennsylvania who spends a lot of time spinning theories about how Obama’s administration will either be (a) the second coming of Hitler; or (b) the apocalypse. She’s drawing all sorts of loony parallels between the various events.
She’s got a website but I’d feel terrible selling her out. It’s nutty as hell but, still, she’s family.
Candy said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:58
Anyone else get the feeling we’re just treading water here until Inauguration Day? What, no wingnutz out there uttering risible statements? Or have they all offed themselves in shame and despair?
Over at Orcinus, Mr. Neiwert has posted several articles of the sort that used to guarantee an onslaught of right-wing trollery, but nary a one had shown up when last I checked.
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:00
Pravda nyet pravda?
MzNicky said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:03
Candy: Perhaps we’ve finally discovered the secret to getting them all to shut their yap-holes: Elect a brilliant black man as president! Woo-hoo! We should have thought of this eight years ago.
MzNicky said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:06
dan b: Tell me about it. I read in my local morning “newspaper” (read: Rethug tool) that 2 out of 3 white voters exiting the polls in my state consider themselves evangelical Christians. Two out of three. In a state that’s 85 percent white. Wow. Now I don’t feel so good again.
Jena and not-Jena said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:06
Leave us out of this!!!!!1!
The Truth's goalposts said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:09
Dude, we’re exhausted. Just let us stand still for a minute, yeah?
dan b said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:12
Hey, the sooner we can blow this planet up is the sooner we all get to reach the eternal bliss of heaven, right? Well, “all” of us except for the Jews, Muslims, Catholics, Mormons, athiests, agnostics, etc.
Lotsa scary fucks out there.
Inigo Montoya said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:12
Liberals, thanks for asking what a predicate felon is. Exact definitions vary according to jurisdiction, but essentially a predicate felon is a repeat felon.
Truthie,
Your ass has been kicked. Now shut up before we really take you apart.
Inigo Montoya said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:15
I was attacked by an evil robot on May 4, 2006.
So that was you on the automated L train!
Inigo Montoya said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:17
1) Symbols (like a noose) are more important than actual people (like the kid who was beaten into the hospital).
2) Collective punishment is acceptable. If some white kids hung a noose, then it is OK to beat up a different white kid.
1) When the kid who gets beaten up is the same asshole who’s been putting up nooses, then no, I hold his life cheap.
Why do you defend a racist bigot hatemonger?
Oh. Sorry. I forget who I’m talking to.
2) Y’know, Troofie, if I walk down a dark alley at night with a sign saying “stab me” and I get stabbed, while there may have been a crime, I did sort of, you know, invite it…
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:18
Oh. Look at that…I forgot to rewrite my nym.
Sorry, Troofie, I’m sure that befuddled you.
Duros Hussein 62 said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:18
Dear SadlyNo editors,
Can you please post something wherein the main point of the article isn’t immediately disprovable?
Kthnxbai.
You know, I don’t think that sort of racist language is warranted.
Candy said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:23
2 out of 3 white voters exiting the polls in my state consider themselves evangelical Christians. Two out of three.
I tend to distrust polls that ask people to define themselves by religious group. Not so long ago I still considered myself a Catholic, even though I hadn’t been to mass in 20 years and was an agnostic on the cusp of being the self-identified atheist I am today. Some of that sort of self-identification is bound to be cultural and reflect how a person has been taught to think of themselves. (Not that I doubt that there’s a shitload of evangelicals around those parts, mind you.)
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:25
So I was wrong about the election. And the GOP was wrong about Iraq, New Orleans, Pakistan, Putin, National Missile Defence, global warming, stem cell research, the EPA, the US attorney appointments, Valerie Plame, Social Security, fiscal policy, the estate tax, Medicare, Guantanmo Bay, torture, Colombia, medical marujiana, infrastructure investment, Supreme Court appointments, Afghanistan, unilateralism, the theory of unitary executive power, health insurance, Saudi Arabia, energy policy, the No Child Left Behind Act, the “Healthy Forests” Initiative, the 2001 Bin Laden memo, coal mine safety, arsenic levels in drinking water, Don Siegelman, warantless wire-tapping, Harriet Myers, hiring mercenary armies, bio-fuels, and Terri Schiavo.
Happy now?
Can we please now get back to the subject of violent blacks and the liberals who support their thuggery?
Smut Clyde said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:25
Similarly we cannot compete [...] if we have a significant deficit, as we do, with women, where we have a large deficit with Hispanics, where we have a large deficit with African American voters, where we have a large deficit with people of modest incomes and modest financial circumstances
Wait, wait. A republican is arguing that a deficit is a competitive disadvantage? Seems a few years too late.
Smut Clyde said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:28
There is no truth.
Everything is true, and nothing is permitted.
LittlePig said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:31
Looks like Truthie hasn’t heard of Karl Popper, either.
Permits™³²®© said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:32
Catch us if you can!
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:35
Truth is beauty, beauty is truth, and if you take cranberries and stew them like applesauce it tastes much more like prunes than rhubarb does.
Susan of Texas said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:37
In the end, when everything they’ve ever said has been proved to be wrong, racism is all they have left.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:38
The white kid that the black thugs beat up wasn’t involved in the noose hanging.
Oh?
And you know this…how, precisely?
Tell us, Truth, what insight do you have into the prosecution and or defense evidence?
Tell us, Truthie, what grand insider information are you revealing to us here? Are you liable for revealing confidential grand jury testimony for telling us?
Tell us, Troofie….UNDER THE LAW…how you know Justin wasn’t one of the kids who hung the nooses?
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:38
Truth?
Your ass just got kicked. Again.
Maybe you ought to go home before I steal your lunch.
rotten mcdonald said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:39
You know, now that I think about it, my car’s right front tire has had a slow leak for the past 7+ years.
Obviously, this is the fault of the Bush Administration. I demand that they buy me new tires and rims.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:41
if you take cranberries and stew them like applesauce it tastes much more like prunes than rhubarb does.
You were warm but so was she.
kefauver said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:42
Ya’ll should leave His Truthiness alone. It’s like picking on a disabled kid. Not nice and very rude.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:42
Come on, Troofie! You’re so certain, show us in the evidence that convicted the Jena Six where it was established that Justin was not involved.
Stop throwing around rumour as fact, son.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:43
We should probably call up the Arkansas AG and tell him we have a bona fide witness here who will swear under oath that Justin was innocent of any hate crime against the defendants or any black kid.
Really, Troofie! How come you aren’t volunteering your keen insight and knowledge of the facts of the case?
zeppo said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:44
“Evil robot” is an oxymoron. Go read Asimov. Ever heard of the three laws of robotics? Or is it the three robot laws… Um… Anyway, there’s one there about robots not harming humans, and another one about not being allowed to join a union… I think there’s something in there also about having sex with Townhall contributors, but I may be mistaken about that.
Anyway, that’s a very hateful thing to say about robots, and I feel very sorry for you.
Robbie in 2012!
dan b said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:45
I’m still wondering why alleged criminal offenses that occurred well after the event in question are supposed to be remotely relevant or probative to this discussion.
Oh, right, they aren’t relevant or probative to the discussion of what happened at that school in December 2006. I guess I have to wonder no more.
Rightwingsnarkle said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:45
You’d think the guy would at least have the class to call himself Veritas. Much snappier.
Doctorb said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:48
To be clear, the issue is not that insulting or ‘fighting words,’ those that by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace, legitimize or legalize spontaneous violence against the speaker. It’s more the question of charging minors who committed assault and battery (misdemeanors) as adults for attempted murder. Plus associated legal bullshittery, eg “sneakers are deadly weapons”.
Vino said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:49
I have a restraining order out on Veritas.
Xecky Gilchrist said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:53
Pie pie everywhere, and not a thought to think.
Golden.
Anyone else get the feeling we’re just treading water here until Inauguration Day? What, no wingnutz out there uttering risible statements? Or have they all offed themselves in shame and despair?
It is a bit slow, but I’ll admit I like the troll-baiting stuff better than the Brad-losing-his-shit stuff.
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:55
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/22/AR2007092201404.html?nav=rss_technology
Troofie, maybe you can find the website that WaPo is talking about here and hang out in their comment board…seems like they’d be right up your alley.
N__B said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:55
Looks like Truthie hasn’t heard of Karl Popper, either.
I always get him confused with Orville Redenbacher and try to disprove my popcorn.
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:56
You’d think the guy would at least have the class to call himself Veritas. Much snappier.
He couldn’t because that’s not the true patriotic English language God dicated the Bible in, but some made-up Eurotrash gobbledygook.
Just like the French have no word for enterpreneur.
alec said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:56
You loony libs don’t get it, do you? When a black teenager can be called racist, of course they deserve to be put in prison for life. On the other hand, beating up a racist white teenager who was actively involved in punishing you and your friends for sitting in the wrong part of the school with a death threat? Whoa there! Don’t get all activist on us!
Long story short – and yes, Troof, I’m ignoring your inane pabulum, because each and every one of your charges was addressed by parties with a direct standing in this case in 2006-7 and I’ve got better things to to do than try and convince some suburban chiffarobe-monitor that black people are not, in fact, to blame for the Holocaust – racism is only real when it’s reverse racism, the Emancipation Proclamation forced liberty on a people unsuited for it, and naming a day and a street after Martin Luther King is unfair unless you also do it for David Duke, who struggled similarly for the constitutional rights and spiritual freedom of a long-oppressed, nationally underrepresented minority.
And there’s nothing wrong with threatening black kids with nooses. In fact, if you don’t try and menace any black child who spends too long near your property with lynching, what kind of American are you?
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:57
> Troofie, maybe you can find the website that WaPo is talking about here and hang out in their comment board…seems like they’d be right up your alley.
I thought that Truth designed that website.
Brad said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:57
Troofie — why don’t you just tell us how outraged you are by Chapaquidick?
Brandi said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:58
How nice for Pravda to grace us with his presence during the refractory period. I hope he uses a sealed keyboard, though.
alec said,
November 13, 2008 at 21:58
And I’ve pointed it out before and probably will have to again: to me, the funniest thing about Pravda is that he feels compelled to troll even when the RNC doesn’t have fresh talking points for him, so he defaults to whining about how nobody is willing to rape those blacks he sees with their hip-hop on his morning commute with a plunger any more. Seriously, it’s a baker’s dozen kinds of pathetic and pretty readily explains why he’s latched onto the Party Line so firmly – no one else would have such a dogmatic, pathetic bigot.
alec said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:01
Also, how the liberal mainstream media’s bias against real Americans keeps them from talking about the real story – ironclad evidence by an anonymous fat man that Adlai Stevenson was a homo.
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:01
I think it’s interesting to point that out in order to get a clearer picture of what really happened in Jena.
And yet if we try to “get a clearer picture” of how we got involved in Iraq, which has had thousands of times more direct impact on people’s lives, we’re a bunch of traitors and BDS sufferers.
Nice priorities you got there, Pravda.
Rugged in Montana said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:01
“By all means, keep trying though. It is demonstrating the typical intellectual weakness of liberals, as well as the usual hatred underneath.”
Tell ‘em, truth! Give ‘em hell!
The thing that sticks out with you libs is the hatred underlying everything you say about equality, justice and peace.
When you read The Truth, can’t you see the love for humanity that spurs him on? How do you look at yourselves in the mirror?
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:02
> Troofie — why don’t you just tell us how outraged you are by Chapaquidick?
I vote for him to tell us how Carter caused the crappy economy during the Carter years, but that the economic “delay time” changed so that Clinton was the cause of the chimpo recession.
Then he can regale us with stories about how Carter caused the Bush I recession, after a modified time delay just enough for raygun to have caused the prosperity under his term.
Brad said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:03
Troofie — I also hear that FDR sold America out at Yalta.
dan b said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:05
Again, this argument is a fallacy. It alleges that these kids have committed other crimes in the future but it still has no bearing whatsoever on December 2006. It is completely irrelevant to the discussion. Are people supposed to disown Rodney King because of his scrapes with the law subsequent to getting his ass beat by those cops? No. The initial treatment of these kids (trumped-up attempted murder charges) was wrong. Their alleged behavior after-the-fact does not change this.
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:07
How do you look at yourselves in the mirror?
It’s a little something we like to call “refraction of light”.
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:08
I see no one is contesting my point that McCain actually won the election with major gains in Ohio, Florida and New York.
Instead they are trying to claim that there is racism in the American South, revealing their intellectual bankruptcy and hate.
A Truth Imitator said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:09
Hello, my internet handle is The Truth and I am a shit-ignorant, bigoted, tiny-penised closet case.
Apparently, this is flattery.
kiki said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:11
Fake ‘McCain won’ Truth is pretty funny, and his argument is no less ridiculous than anything the real thing is likely to come up with.
I say go with it, Truth Fairy. I’m sure the fake won’t mind.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:12
Show me any evidence that the only real victim of Jena – the white kid jumped and beat up by six black thugs who’ve gone on to commit subsequent felonies – participated in the noose hanging.
I asked you first. YOU claimed he was innocent!
Well, dickless, that sounds like a declarative statement to me, and don’t blame ME because you were too stoopid to pick up on it earlier!
Now…put up or shut up, Troofie.
We’re waiting.
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:12
either those sympathizing with the black criminals or those on the side of actual justice
I think by “justice” here he means “lynching,” as used in the anti-Jena 6 website whose talking points Pravda is echoing here–when they posted the phone #s and personal info of the Jena 6 and their families, they said they did it “in case anyone wants to deliver justice.”
I can only imagine the self-congratulatory monologue running through his head….“O Proud Standard-Bearer of The Truth, standing up for the traditional White American right to intimidate darkies with nooses against the hordes of multiculturalist mongrels who try to apply White notions like “fairness” and “objectivity” to a case of Negro uppity-ness where they don’t apply. Don’t these morans know that gangs of White kids are the only ones who are allowed to engage in racial intimidation? Negroes who attempt to do the same need to be punished severely and their deadly basket-ball sneakers need to be treated as such. That way we can get them in prison early so that as much of their lives as possible can be spent in prison raping each other rather than White women….
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:14
No account of Jena, either those sympathizing with the black criminals or those on the side of actual justice, has ever claimed that the victim of the assault brought it on himself by being involved in the noose hanging.
And…………
And yet, you take it as faith that he was innocent.
Meanwhile, you’d accuse Barack Obama of being a terrorist sympathizer based on a lot less evidence than has been put forth that poor l’il Justin is a known racist bigot.
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:15
Not that this won’t stop you from changing the subject;
whoa…did HE just accuse US of changing the subject? As Bart Simpson might say, the ironing is delicious.
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:16
With what delight, odoriferous mouth,
You both blather and eat pie;
Yet as one pleasure comes, the other withdraws.
How one delight eats into the other, if sweetly
Your soul lives for both.
What delicate harmony might be made, sweet pie-eating;
What delicate harmony might be made, dear piffle-talking,
If both delights could occur at once!
Speaking your pie and eating your words!
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:16
And for those of you asking why the subsequent arrests of the Jena 6 felons matter: why, it shows their character.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, because no cop has ever arrested anyone who had previously embarassed the ever-living shit out of them as a harassment technique.
Why, not even Dirty Harry Callahan would stoop THAT low!
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:17
So come on, Troofie…show me where in the court records it says that Justin was innocent of involvement in the nooses…I’m waiting.
henry lewis said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:17
Just got here. Probably not the first to point this out.
A psychoseptic toad with a stunted vocabulary is no great thing. Any fool can come here and shake the turdlets out his pantlegs for the other readers to sniff. Why would you salute such crap?
If ever one of these annoying fuckbags had some sort of an epiphany – an awakening to the notion of human progress – and demonstrated his change of heart here in the threads, I guess that would be worth celebrating.
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:19
And for those of you asking why the subsequent arrests of the Jena 6 felons matter: why, it shows their character.
Plus, it allows you to change the subject away from your laughably stupid McCain prediction and how you got your ass shredded on the “Bush protected us from the turrists” claim and back to what seems to be your favorite topic: the perfidy and evil of black people. Have you been reading the Book of Mormon or something??
A Poor Pitiful Obsessive Compulsive Sufferer said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:22
You know, (DrDick), if you Liberals don’t respond to every one (DrDick) of my endless attempts to fudge (DrDick!) the issue, google text that I can copy (DrDick) and paste, or even take seriously my disconnected (DrDick), repetitive (DrDick!) and obsessive comments, then I’ve clearly proven that (DrDick) Liberals are bad. Even though you all have a much better social life than mine, which if I ever repeated it to a female at work (DrDick work being the only place I can ever speak (DrDick) to them without them being able to walk away laughing) would just mean instant (DrDick) and complete social death. Also I take the (DrDick) Jenna case so seriously because I hate the idea that you can’t just be an anti-social and racist asshole without someone taking the law into their own hands and giving me, I mean them a kicking. Also… I’m not a repressed homosexual! Why do you even think that in the first place?! I’m not constantly struggling with thoughts about dick! (DrDick)
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:23
Have you been reading the Book of Mormon or something??
I hear them white salamander’s good eatin’.
Smut Clyde said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:23
Executive summary of thread so far:
– Troll enjoys winding up liberal commenters by pressing their buttons (e.g. by always following the word ‘black’ with ‘thug’, and contrarywise, to establish the synonymous nature of the two words).
– Liberal commenters enjoy being wound up.
– General Panglossian happiness, spontaneous choruses of “Circle of Life”, etc.
Me, I get more enjoyment from drinking metal polish strained through a football sock, but chacun a son goat.
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:27
> Me, I get more enjoyment from drinking metal polish strained through a football sock, but chacun a son goat.
I long for the days when compounds that were both a floor polish and a dessert were available without a doctor’s prescription.
Liberalism said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:28
Oh noes! My philosophical tenets and associated popular economic, social and foreign policy agenda now hang on the actions of Justin Barker!
I sure hope someone can respond to The Truth to his satisfaction.
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:30
I hear them white salamander’s good eatin’.
Anything white is bound to be good eating. It’s simple logic that these dumb liberals just don’t understand: white is the color of purity, God’s love and the truth (also The Truth), black is the color of sin, corruption, evil, God’s hate, and also of many very gullible new post-1978 converts to Mormonism.
zeppo said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:34
White is the color of good food. Real food. Potatoes. Sugar. Bread (Real bread, not that nancy “whole grain” crap.) Whole milk. Crisco. That filling stuff that goes inside Twinkies….
D.N. Nation said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:34
FWIW, I’m “The Truth” for about 15% of his posts.
dan b said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:35
Pure AND everlasting. Just like Jesus!
Pere Ubu said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:35
black is the color of sin, corruption, evil, God’s hate, and also of many very gullible new post-1978 converts to Mormonism.
Remarkably enough, it’s also the color of my true love’s hair.
personally I think absurdity is the way to respond to trolls. They don’t understand it, and it’s more fun than trying to catch their whizzing goalposts.
SomeNYGuy said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:38
You liberals are laughing now, but how will you face The Truth when McCain wins on November 4, 2008? Why, you’ll be too ashamed to show your lying faces!
Smut Clyde said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:39
black is the color of a healthy, haemoglobin-rich variety of sausage.
Smut Clyde said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:40
Indeed, absurdity is the way to respond to almost all of life’s vicissitudes.
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:41
Mmmmmmm…..sausage.
zeppo said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:41
Except when getting a traffic ticket. Cops don’t appreciate absurdity that much.
Parody Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:43
“Given that you can’t support that claim, you once again fail. Thanks for trying, though. Pointing this out is fun and easy. No matter how angry you get for failing here, the record will remain for all to view and mock.”
I resign.
I am no longer able to keep up with this level of delusion, psychological projection and self-importance.
I will return as Gary Ruppert.
Thank-you, SadlyNauts for your support during what has been a difficult time for all of us.
DrDick said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:44
Troofie -
Hate to disappoint you, but unlike you I actually have a job and expected to, you know, work. As to the Jena 6, I frankly do not give a rat’s ass and have no idea what your whole freaking obsession is about. A bunch of white thugs engaged in an act of racial intimidation fostering an environment resulting in a bunch of black kids beating up a white kid. the latter was not (contrary to your position) seriously injured and was released from the hospital the same day. The blatantly racist DA filed trumped up attempted murder charges which were later struck down by the appellate court. Whoopee! Does this in anyway compare to 4 centuries of systematic brutality, beatings, rape, mutilation, and killings inflicted on blacks by whites? Does this somehow balance out the thousands of blacks, beaten, mutilated, raped, and lynched by whites since the end of slavery where no one was ever punished? Is this the same as cases where those who murdered innocent people during the civil rights struggle still cannot be convicted by white juries in the south? Your sense of proportion is truly amazing. Now kindly go fuck yourself with your burning cross as I have better things to do than debate demented idiot racists.
dan b said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:45
I miss Guillermo Ruperto.
Legalize said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:45
“And for those of you asking why the subsequent arrests of the Jena 6 felons matter: why, it shows their character.”
No it doesn’t. It shows their propensity to act in a manner not consistent with teh law in a specific instance. In teh law, this is known as a prior bad act. Description of such is generally not admissible in criminal proceedings unless such shows one’s tendency to engage in activity calculated to deceive the court. Why? Because the prejudice is likely to outweigh the probative value of the testimony. In other words, the law understands that certain bigoted assholes might tend to engage in the same pig-ignorant arguemnts as you are.
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:46
I want to see the looks on all your faces when Sarah Palin becomes President on January 20th, liberals.
You will wonder how I foresaw this. You will say, that Truth, he spoke The Truth.
N__B said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:46
I will return as Gary Ruppert.
The Second Dumbing?
RUGGED IN MONTANA said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:46
My family has been protecting the planet from the aliens of Alpha Centauri for thousands of years. We have costumes and superpowers and everything
Mebbe you could do something about the massive flocks of rabid pelicans hovering over my beautiful Butte?
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:49
> My family has been protecting the planet from the aliens of Alpha Centauri for thousands of years. We have costumes and superpowers and everything
That’s a good accomplishment, but not as good as my families’.
We protect republicans from reality.
So far, we’re batting 1000.
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:51
Mebbe you could do something about the massive flocks of rabid pelicans hovering over my beautiful Butte?
Too bad they’re not boobies.
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:51
So let me see if I’ve got this straight: out of the Jena 6, one has been convicted of a crime, one got pulled over for speeding, and two others have been charged with (but not convicted of) crimes. This means that they are all evil hooligans who deserve to rot in prison forever and the white kid they beat up is a heroic race martyr. And because we can only prove that Barker was taunting them with racist slurs and not that he personally hung the nooses that started the whole incident, that means that we have “failed” to achieve the straw man goal you have set up for us of proving that Barker “deserved” his assault. Is this actually the reasoning process of a sane human being or did someone wire up Jesse Helms’ disembodied brain to a computer?
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:53
Actor212 is getting even sillier, asking for proof that Barker didn’t hang up the nooses in the court records.
No, I’m asking YOU to prove you “factual” statement that he had not. The only evidence I will accept is sworn testimony under oath, since that’s the only truth, pun intended, there possibly can be to confront the lies of assholes like you who think they can ram their opinions down other people’s throats and call it a “win”.
I win. You lose. You’re an epic fail, Troofie.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:54
out of the Jena 6, one has been convicted of a crime
NONE have been convicted. The sole conviction was overturned on appeal. The kid then pled guilty.
To a misdemeanor.
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:57
Oh, and just a protip for Mr. Legal Eagle before I have to go–in order to use a big, fancy phrase like “predicate felon” you have to be referring to people who have been convicted of more than one felony. Only one member of the group fits that definition.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:57
Come on, Troofie. A simple “I cannot” to providing that court testimony will be sufficient.
Don’t worry. I won’t embarass you.
Too badly.
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:58
Nevermind–apparently NONE of the group fits that definition. So much for the new word of the day….
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 22:59
Sorry, Apik. Facts are stupid things ;-)
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:00
Here’s the thing, Troofie: you won’t let facts get in the way of a good story designed to get a rise out of people.
It won’t work that way, son. You’re now being held accountable. Put up, or shut up.
And trust me, for both our sakes, I’d prefer you chose the latter.
DrDick said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:00
Don’t worry Actor212, Troofie has never let a little thing like facts get in his way.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:00
Great minds, Dick.
Shorter The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:02
Don’t worry, you evil liberals. I’ll be back.
I’m just waiting for new marching orders from my AM Radio idols.
Donovan said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:03
Lies! It’s yellow.
Four weeks ago, The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:03
Oh, I’ll be here, don’t worry. I am enjoying your triumphalism because it shows me – and everyone else – exactly what you are. It will be even more enjoyable when you lose. You will be absolutely astonished – as astonished as Cubs fans were when their vaunted team got swept out in the first round.
If you really think Obama is going to win GA, NC, VA, CO,IN – keep dreaming. The same polls that you liberals railed against when your empty suit candidate was down are now your lifeline, hmm? I wouldn’t miss the reaction on Nov 4 and 5 here for the world!
dan b said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:04
Sweet! MadLibs!
“It is OK for FART people to beat up innocent SHITTY people.
It is not OK for LUMPY people to beat up innocent DOO-DOO people.”
Pedantic Asshole said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:04
“How do you look at yourselves in the mirror?
It’s a little something we like to call ‘refraction of light.’”
It’s actually reflection. Refraction is what happens when a ray of light passes through a transparent surface, like a lens, and has its angle changed by its incidence with that surface.
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:04
> The only real victim of Jena was a white kid named Barker, whom your fellow liberals are trying to smear as bringing it on himself.
All those black victims were just blacks and thus not “real”.
handy said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:05
What the Hell? Jena 6?
Good god, somebody is losing his (her? its?) mind! I guess the reality of a black man being President must have scarred you in deep places.
RUGGED IN MONTANA said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:08
Too bad they’re not boobies.
Boobies hovering over my Butte? This is starting to sound like a Penthouse letter.
Racist Shitbag said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:08
Hey! I heard you guys were devoting entire posts and threads to folks like me these days. Where do I sign up?
mikey said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:10
Hey smut, pass that nice strained metal polish over here.
This whole thing is giving me a headache.
The Truth is an idiot.
If he came to your door smelling of beer farts and spray paint and began badgering (or even pelicanning) you about your political worldview by making dishonest and ugly racist statements, you would hit him with a rake and close the door (ok, maybe that’s just what I’D do, but you know what I mean).
In what world is it remotely enjoyable to type it instead?
mikey
Even More Pedantic Asshole said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:13
Technically, in a standard mirror, it’s both refraction and reflection. The light refracts through the glass, reflects off the silvered back plane, and refracts back through the glass.
Racist Shitbag said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:13
Truth! Dude, you are like my idol. How do I get in on some of this action?
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:13
Actor212, your argument is so utterly stupid (no court statement is going to list people that aren’t involved) that I actually feel sorry for you.
Oh? Justin Barker, the, you know, victim? Isn’t going to be named in court documents?
Come on, Troofie. We’re waiting. Show me in the court records where the victim was innocent.
Here’s a hint, Troofie: Arkansas posts their court records on the Internet.
Orange Tom said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:15
I’m sorry Truthie, I haven’t been paying attention. Have we addressed the idea that this whole Jena thing started when a black kid asked to sit under the “white tree”? Or the notion that there would be an apartheid symbol like a “white tree” that was being held onto by brainwashed dixie-kids? If we’re going to start digging around in the past (which Jena is, chum), why don’t we get into all of the “strange fruit” that was hanging in southern trees in years gone by?
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:16
Here, Troofie, fill out this sentence:
“Justin Barker was innocent of racism because ___________.”
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:17
Thanks, dan b; as a somewhat lumpy person I needed to know that.
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:18
> Good stuff, liberals. When and where is teh Funny or snark going to happen?
Whenever you leave it gets hilarious around here.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:18
No one can defend the racism of justifying an innocent white kid being assaulted by a mob of black thugs, although both alec and actor212 tried to smear the only actual victim of Jena by saying he hung nooses….
No one has to justify anything except the man who is smearing the black kids involved with lies and slanders.
That, um, would be you, Troofie.
zeppo said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:18
No one can refute that a tiny invisible Leprechaun lives inside my ear.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:19
Actor212, I’m just going to let a question like
Here’s a hint, Troofie: Arkansas posts their court records on the Internet
stand as your contribution to the discussion about Jena. It’s perfect.
That you think a declarative statement is a question?
I’m cool with that.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:19
Here, Troofie, fill out this sentence:
“Justin Barker was innocent of racism because ___________.”
(I can cut and paste, too, Troofie, only my original material is truthier)
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:21
Poor Troofie. No wonder he’s got his mind all mixed up. He never learned English grammar.
Orange Tom said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:22
No one can refute that Bush has kept terrorism from our shores.
It’s far more likely that the spirit of history knew Obama was coming and that’s what prevented what you’re defining as “terrorism”.
As far as I’m concerned, what Bush did to the Constitution was vastly more terroristic in application than anythin bin Laden ever tried.
Smut Clyde said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:22
The light refracts through the glass, reflects off the silvered back plane, and refracts back through the glass.
Real liberals use phase-conjugate mirror cavities.
dan b said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:23
No one can refute that George W. Bush caused my check engine light to go on earlier this year.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:23
Here, Troofie, fill out this sentence:
“Justin Barker was innocent of racism because ___________.”
Troofie, I’ll even accept “Because I said so”.
Of course, that opens a whole new can of worms.
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:24
When and where is teh Funny or snark going to happen?
Hey, man, I did my part, I brought the mother-fucking jello salad.
dan b said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:24
I have yet to discover the reverse corollary to the lumpy/doo-doo analysis.
Righteous Bubba said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:24
No one can refute that a tiny invisible Leprechaun lives inside my ear.
I hear no jigs.
OneMan said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:24
Hey everybody, I have a joke for you all! Stop me if you’ve heard it before.
How is an internet argument like the Special Olympics?
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:26
I hear no jigs.
And yet you still keep digging for gold in there.
Smut Clyde said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:26
How do you look at yourselves in the mirror?
Come to think of it — real liberals don’t need to look at themselves in a mirror at all. They project themselves onto society and look at that instead.
Righteous Bubba said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:26
We all feel great about ourselves?
Smut Clyde said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:27
I brought the mother-fucking jello salad.
Did it contain gummie dicks?
zeppo said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:27
At least liberals HAVE reflections when we look into our mirrors….
Or is that a refraction?
Legalize said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:28
No one can prove that Twoofie’s fallaciousness is worse than any other undefined fallaciousness
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:29
Sorry, let me laugh at Dr. Dick some more!
This guy thinks that teaching students about black people (sorry, liberals, “African-Americans”) is a job!
He has a PhD in black people stuff! Get it?
Blacks! Ethnics!
What about ethnics could ever be worth studying!
LOL! LOL! LOL!
Still, to be fair to poor Dr. Dick, he isn’t the lamest academic so-called intellectual I’ve trounced in debate recently. The other day I came across a – get this – a “gynaecologist”. A guy who studies women! For a living! And the government forks out tax-payer cash for these people!
LOL! ROFL! ROTFLMAO!
_______________________________________________
John McCain. Four more years! Four more years!
Rugged in Montana said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:30
Jeez, I tell ya. The arguements you liberals make in support of your politically correct discrimination of white people, is pathetic.
Just so I understand, because of slavery, which is been illegal in this country for a century and a half, black people have a right to do or say anything they want to whites, but when white people do the same its racist?
The Truth is right on the mark on this one. Hanging a noose in a tree, does not give blacks the right to beat up white people, even the whites who put the noose in the tree. This should have been strictly a school matter, the white kids who hung the noose should have at the most got a one week suspension.
The black kids on the other hand did something far worse than hang an ancient symbol on a tree. They beat a white student half to death, for no reason. He wasn’t one of the students who hung the noose. The five blacks who did this should be serving life in prison for attempted murder. Attempted murder is something far more serious than exercising free speech (which is exactly what hanging a noose is btw.), no matter how distasteful the speech was.
A Poor Pitiful Obsessive Compulsive Sufferer said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:31
I’m just going to let a statement like
4) DrDick comes back to feebly thrash around some more, then flees as quickly as possible to hide at the bottom of the lake again.
stand as your contribution to the discussion about The Truth’s sanity. It’s perfect
Seriously, how much of a mental illness does it take to think that just ignoring someone who points out the unhealthy obsession with one poster and his name (who hasn’t once shown any real concern about what you are saying about him in turn) means that the next time you obsessively talk about said poster, you seriously think any credible witness is not going to notice that you’ve done it again?
And how badly have you misunderstood the art of trolling when you are discrediting your own persona, and using fishing analogy used to bait yourself in the past on others, in a thread written by those others baiting you to come out and play in the first place?
“And what did you do last night The Truth?”
“Well, every 20 minutes or so, I responded in a Pavlovian fashion to a thread on the internet asking me personally to make a fool of myself, so hundreds of people around the world could laugh at me. Then I promised to keep doing it for at least another 4 years, on top of the years I’ve already spent humiliating myself. And then I felt good about myself for having done so!”
“You realize there’s now no chance in hell you’ll ever be able to act upon your reductionist ideals of ‘getting inside of me’ now, yes?”
“But if I correctly fill in the blanks in this sentance; ‘ _______ got inside of her’, that means that I will! Take that, Liberal Woman!”
“Whatever…. later, creep.”
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:32
Oh, and just a protip for Mr. Legal Eagle before I have to go–in order to use a big, fancy phrase like “predicate felon” you have to be referring to people who have been convicted of more than one felony.
And if you’re going to misuse it, Troofie, then you might as well lump in the white “victim”, Barker, who was arrested for illegal possession of a gun and bullets on campus five months later…
Thug, indeed.
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:32
The McCain/Palin landslide on November 4th, 2008 will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Jena 6 were guilty.
Just you wait until November 4th.
November 4th. Right around the corner.
Nothing will ever be the same after November 4th.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:33
Justin Barker isn’t racist because he didn’t harm anyone because of their race.
And your proof?
Despite the fact that affadavits filed with the DA show that Barker had taunted one of the victims of the Fair Barn incident just moments earlier in gym class?
Tell me, do you even READ the shit you post about?
Alex Higgins said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:34
1) No one can refute that Bush has kept terrorism from our shores.
Er… The Truth?
September 11th, 2001?
zeppo said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:34
It’s difficult to be an absurdist with this absurd argument going on. Jeez.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:34
OK, here’s a question Actor212: What does the fact that AR posts court records on the internet have to do with Jena?
I was pointing you in the direction of where you could find the answer to my challenge.
Now, I reiterate: show me in the court records where Justin Barker is not a racist.
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:35
Did it contain gummie dicks?
They told me they were LIGHTHOUSES! How was I to know?!
zeppo said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:35
Gummie lighthouses? Man, how gulliable can one be?
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:35
I’m still waiting for any evidence that Justin Barker hung the nooses at Jena. (Hint: it isn’t coming because there isn’t any.) So that leaves in shreds even the specious argument that you and Alec were pushing.
I never said he did or didn’t, as any casual scan of the thread will show.
I asked YOU to prove he did not.
You failed to do so. You lose.
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:36
“1) No one can refute that Bush has kept terrorism from our shores.”
Yes, liberals, no one can refute the fact that Bush prevented 9/11 from happening.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:36
Actor212, does this mean you are running away from your earlier statement that Barker hung the nooses?
I can’t run from that I never said.
Lee Atwater's Unopened, Still Cellophane-wrapped Bible said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:36
Wait, what do the Jena 6 have to do with McCain and Palin losing the election?
Parody Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:37
This is what I’m talking about!
The Truth just claimed that 9/11 is a figment of liberlas’ imagination. How can I keep up with that! FFS!
owlbear1 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:37
Alex Higgins said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:34
1) No one can refute that Bush has kept terrorism from our shores.
Er… The Truth?
September 11th, 2001?
===============================================
Don’t you remember? Standing in the rubble and hugging fire fighters was Dubya’s GREATEST moment.
Djur said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:38
Looks like Pravda has been reading Lombroso again.
Pedantic Asshole said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:38
“Technically, in a standard mirror, it’s both refraction and reflection. The light refracts through the glass, reflects off the silvered back plane, and refracts back through the glass.”
This is incorrect, because the plano (i.e. no refractive power) surface of the clear glass does not bend the incoming light before it is reflected, otherwise the mirror would magnify, minify, or distort astigmatically.
What happens at the surface of the clear, plano glass of a mirror (or window, etc.) is transmission, not refraction.
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:38
I hate black people! There, I’ve said it.
Well, actually I’m just really, really scared of them. All this yapping I’m doing is to distract everybody from my predictions of a McCain victory, and to hide the fact that I am TERRIFIED of President Obama.
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:39
It’s difficult to be an absurdist with this absurd argument going on. Jeez.
We must redouble our efforts! My god, man Smut has gone so far as to mirror his cavities! How he got the silver paint on the wrong side remains a mystery…
Gary Ruppert said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:40
The fact is, while I respectfully disagree with The Truth that McCain won the election this year (yes, we conservatives do have some disagreements among ourselves, we’re not all zombies unlike Obama cultists), he is correct when he says that Bush protected us from an event like 9/11, which would have destroyed the Twin Towers and part of the Pentagon.
I thank God every day that his leadership saved us from so awful an event.
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:40
cavities! How he got the silver paint on the wrong side remains a mystery…
He paid the silver nitrate.
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:41
If President McCain decides against running for a second term, Palin/Jindal will beat the Jena 6 in the 2012 election.
Answer, The Jena 6 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:44
Question, what does young Barbara Bush call the toes on her twin sister’s left foot?
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:46
I declare myself the winner of any debate here, even if facts oppose me.
Rugged in Montana said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:47
Liberals, regardless of how y’all what to spin it, there was no justification for the Jena 6 beatings. (six blacks btw, not five as I originally stated above) Past discrimination is no justification for violence.
I know in your PC skulls full of mush, that if the situation were reversed, and six white thugs beat a black student half to death, that y’all would be singing a different tune. You would be demanding for the immediate prosecution and incarceration of the white students. Don’t deny it, I know you liberals all too well.
I’m not racist, but it is true that violence is more prevelant in black communities than in white communities. The biggest reason for this being, in my opinion, the lack of fathers in the home. With over 70% of black children born out of wedlock, you’re bound to have a crime problem. The root cause of this problem is the break down of the tradtional family in the black community. This is the problem, I know the leftwing “civil rights” activists will never admit it, but its true.
I know my saying this is going to get me branded as a racist on this blog, but I don’t care. It was something that needed to be said.
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:47
It’s easy to win arguments when I ignore virtually everything people say to me.
Even More Pedantic Asshole said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:48
Gotta love “Black Box” physics.
tigrismus said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:49
Gullable? Nitrate? I hope this is not becoming another pun thread: I am doctrinally opposed to the Parousia of paronomasia.
A Bus Station Mensroom said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:50
DrDick! Wow, I was starting to look for you on a milk carton…
Time passes… still no Dr. Dick!…
…where is DrDick?…
I got DrDick flopping around in my net again!
zeppo said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:51
Oh, hey, look. A Skinner disciple…. Or maybe it has something to do with Schrödinger’s cat.
SomeNYGuy said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:51
Is Dr. Dick the guy who invented Enzyte?
Rudy Giuliani said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:51
“1) No one can refute that Bush has kept terrorism from our shores.”
9/11!
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:52
“1) No one can refute that Bush has kept terrorism from our shores.”
Ha, ha, ha, ha!
boug said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:53
is this what the Right has been reduced to? obsessing over a handful of high school students? no wonder they got their asses handed to them. keep it up, you ‘tards. the longer you live in denial the better it is for the rest of us.
SomeNYGuy said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:53
No one can refute that Bush has kept terrorism from our shores.
Well, Pauly is safe — but Dinah is dead as a doornail. I blame Bush.
Osama bin Laden said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:54
“1) No one can refute that Bush has kept terrorism from our shores.”
I’m sure there’s something wrong with that statement but I can’t quite my finger on it…
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:54
The biggest reason for this being, in my opinion, the lack of fathers in the home.
Well, maybe you ought to step up and take responsibility for your little “gifts”…
actor212 said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:55
Parousia
It’s called “Iran” nowadays.
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:55
> I know my saying this is going to get me branded as a racist on this blog
Don’t worry, we already knew you were a racist. You didn’t need to waste bandwidth demonstrating it with your little fact-free rant.
The 9/11 Commission said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:55
“1) No one can refute that Bush has kept terrorism from our shores.”
Thank-you for your insightful testimony, Mr. Truth. We will revise our conclusions accordingly.
Wait…
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:56
As bad as 911 was, the actions of the Jena 6 were even worse.
Rugged in Montanta said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:57
The root cause of the problem is that blacks are lame, lame, lame.
Of course, civil rights leaders can’t very well admit that.
I may be called a racist, but it’s time that you libs confronted the lameness of the black man.
New York City said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:59
“1) No one can refute that Bush has kept terrorism from our shores.”
We have inscribed this statement in stone and will place it where the World Trade Center used to be.
tigrismus said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:00
It’s called “Iran” nowadays.
Is it pronounced “erne”? Anyway, a flock of sea birds told me it’s so far away.
Lee Atwater's Unopened, Still Cellophane-wrapped Bible said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:00
The root cause of the problem is that blacks are lame, lame, lame.
Not just racist, but ableist as well.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:03
Donovan said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:03
Don’t you need to be writing a sequel to “Mellow Yellow” or something?
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:03
Anyway, a flock of sea birds told me it’s so far away.
Doesn’t anybody stay in one place, anymore?
tigrismus said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:04
The root cause of the problem is that blacks are lame, lame, lame.
That’s because you took their left leg, leg, leg, no matter how often we told you it wasn’t right or fair*.
*Going. To. Hell.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:05
“paronomasia”?
Hey, that’s one of my favorite Art Of Noise songs! Loved that video with Max Headroom.
A Flock of Seagulls said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:05
She went there! Tigrismus went there!
Ernes are so not sea-birds.
zeppo said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:07
They weren’t seagulls. They were pelicans. Rabid ones.
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:08
Bush is to blame for 9/11, but gets no credit for keeping terrorism from our shores ever since.
Sure, but he also gets blamed for not hosting the Second Coming of Jesus, for which he holds equal responsibility to keeping us safe from terror attacks.
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:09
They were pelicans. Rabid ones.
Is that like a terrier-budgerigar?
An Australian in a Meryl Streep Movie About Baby-Eating Dingos said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:10
Bush is to blame for 9/11, but gets no credit for keeping terrorism from our shores ever since.
Look, sure I might’ve let the dingo run off wit’ one a’ the babies, but ya got three more I ain’t let ‘im eat, so whattareya cryin’ about?
(Lex) Palianated (Azagthoth) said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:12
Holy crap, I missed some of the greatest “situational Tourette’s” on Troofie’s part that I’ve yet seen in any comments section! Oh, please, more? More?
tigrismus said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:13
Ernes are so not sea-birds.
Yuh-huh, cuz crossword puzzle clues NEVER LIE. It’s like a law or something.
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:15
Ernes are so not sea-birds.
Yes they are, you nene.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:15
Ernes are so not sea-birds.
I think this thread has taken a tern for the worse.
Rugged in Montana said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:16
I shouldn’t have to be the one to tell you this, liberals. I mean, lets face it, I’m just an eeevil white “racist”, right? Al Sharpton should be the one telling you this.
What the black community really needs, are more fathers in the home. If young black males, have a positive male role-model in their lives, instead of those piece of trash gangsta rappers, then they will grow up to be, strong, confident, moral, hardworking citizens.
The black community needs strong men of character to lead the individual black families. To ensure that his children go to church every sunday, that they stay away from drugs and gangs, that they learn to be Godly, moral, patriotic young men and women. They should be there to bond with their sons, take them fishing and to a football game, rather then let them wander the streets, which will result in them getting into trouble. Then you will see the black community turn around, and do what is right.
The same goes for the white community as well. I’m not racist, I’m stating to you how, I believe the black community can become more prosperous.
The Truth said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:16
> Bush is to blame for 9/11, but gets no credit for keeping terrorism from our shores ever since.
Why should he? He let the anthrax terrorism occur as well as the DC sniper terrorism.
Oh, and the whole economic deregulation terrorism thing, too. That persists to this very minute.
Smut Clyde said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:16
Erne =/= osprey.
Dope-smoking DFHs leave no tern unstoned.
Rugged in Montana said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:20
I just want to reiterate a point of mine in a previous post:
What the black community really needs, are more fathers in the home. If young black males, have a positive male role-model in their lives, instead of those piece of trash gangsta rappers, then they will grow up to be, strong, confident, moral, hardworking citizens.
This point is CONCLUSIVELY proven by the example of President Obama, who had a strong, positive father in … err, the,… uh,…. home…
WHAT ABOUT THOSE JENA 6 RACISTS??? HUH? WHAT ABOUT THEM!!!!!????!!!!!
JF Sebastian said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:20
I think this thread has taken a tern for the worse.
Auk!
zeppo said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:20
He be puffin away….
The Truth said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:22
So let me get this straight, liberals:
Bush could never have prevented 9/11, but he gets credit for keeping terrorism from our shores ever since becuase his carefully crafted policies must have been the only reason for al-Qa’ida’s weakness on US soil.
No wait…
Did I ever tell you guys about the crimes of the Jena 6?
Smut Clyde said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:23
After checking WIkipedia, I intend to ignore any further reality-oriented claims about the sea-birdiness of ernes, preferring to talk about something else entirely. Internet tradition allows this.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:23
Penguins is practically chickens, y’know.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:24
From MSNBC.com:
Bush makes case for free markets
Oh, thank god! I was so hoping someone would speak up for them.
A Guillemutt said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:24
Q.: What do you call a sea-bird of mixed ancestry?
Teh Free Markets said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:26
We were hoping for a case slightly less coffin-shaped.
zeppo said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:26
O.K. A Guillemutt wins the thread.
EYES ONLY: Bin Laden Determined to Attack in US said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:26
Hi George,
if you’re reading this, I guess you probably missed the “urgent” part, right? And it’s now 2002.
Never mind, just make sure you stop all the other massive terrorist attacks planned for years in advance by small bands of dedicated al-Qa’ida operatives we’ll warn you about and you’ll still make a great president!
Yours sincerely,
The CIA, FBI, NSA and Army Intelligence etc.
P.T. Barnum said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:28
Speaking of sea birds…
this way to the egress!
Simba B said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:28
I wish I’d paid more attention to this thread….but bleh, one of those days.
Having a lot of those lately.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:31
I egret nothing!
The Trugged in Montana said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:32
The root cause of 9/11 was the lack of parental responsibility exercised by black fathers. How could Bush have acted to prevent that?
In a word, Al Sharpton causes terrorism.
Finally, our Talking Points are becoming as one.
The Department of Homeland Security said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:34
Please be aware that we have raised the current threat level to High (Code Orange) because of the Jena 6.
Smut Clyde said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:36
An egress is a female egre, right?
RUGGED IN MONTANA said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:40
The black community needs strong men of character to lead the individual black families.
My evil Bizarro-world twin! Are you telling me you voted for Obama????
tigrismus said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:42
Only males are egre; females are demure.
JF Sebastian said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:42
I like my seabirds with names that sound a little “Noddy,” like the South Georgia Shag or the Peruvian Booby.
Pathe News said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:48
Victory!
The armies of parody are winning! ever marching forward!
The trolls are in retreat!
OTB said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:50
>South Georgia Shag or the Peruvian Booby.
Are those real birds? I’m so gullible.
Simba B said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:51
Oh, Christ. You guys are in fine form today.
You have no idea how much this helps my day.
owlbear1 said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:56
Oh, Christ. You guys are in fine form today.
You have no idea how much this helps my day.
Into Punishment are ya?
Gerald Curl said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:58
This is insane. What have you guys been puffin?
Pravda said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:59
So let me get this right, liberals:
I am to blame for letting the house burn down, but I get no credit for not dropping any cigarettes in pools of kerosene since.
apikores said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:59
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:16
So here it stands:
1) No one can refute that Bush has kept terrorism from our shores.
The Truth said,
November 14, 2008 at 0:05
So let me get this straight, liberals:
Bush is to blame for 9/11, but gets no credit for keeping terrorism from our shores ever since.
Are you illiterate or just stupid?
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:44
Bush did a great job keeping us safe from terrorists post-9/11, unless you happened to be standing in line for an El Al flight at LAX on July 4, 2002, or one of the people who was affected by the anthrax attacks, or a worker at the US Consulate in India, or at an abortion clinic…the list goes on…
Righteous Bubba said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:33
Terrorism. Shouted “Allah akhbar” and everything.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beltway_sniper_attacks
Doctorb said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:00
You know, the whole “you guys are responding to trolls” thing is maybe a bit problematic. Mocking and/or arguing with offensively stupid things written on the internet is indeed a waste of time, but it is the mission statement of Sadly, No!
And plus, it’s better than Minesweeper.
apikores said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:03
The Truth said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:16
So here it stands:
1) No one can refute that Bush has kept terrorism from our shores.
Here we see a classic wingnut arguing technique, the ancient “ignore the comments that showed how wrong I am” ploy.
Comments like this one,
apikores said,
November 13, 2008 at 19:44
Bush did a great job keeping us safe from terrorists post-9/11, unless you happened to be standing in line for an El Al flight at LAX on July 4, 2002, or one of the people who was affected by the anthrax attacks, or a worker at the US Consulate in India, or at an abortion clinic…the list goes on…
And this one
Righteous Bubba said,
November 13, 2008 at 20:33
Terrorism. Shouted “Allah akhbar” and everything.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beltway_sniper_attacks
apikores said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:06
“So, tell me, honey, is it twoo what they say about…you people?
…
It’s twooooooo……OH, IT’S TWOO!”
I wonder if that scene would render DaTwoof aroused, angry on behalf of his race, or some uncomfortable combination of both.
Chef Truth said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:08
Ingredients: Jena 6
Instructions: Bake repeatedly until dry & firm. Serves a nation of racists.
The Truth said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:10
Look, liberals, what is wrong with you?
Look at Bush’s record:
2001 – One terrorist attack on US soil
2002 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
2003 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
2004 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
2005 – One American city destroyed but NOT by terrorism
2006 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
2007 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
2008 – No terrorist attacks on US soil apart from Yemen Embassy
Can’t you haters give him some credit for all the years where no apocalyptic destruction took place in a major US city?
Here is a video to explain this so that even you liberals can understand:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=0jBJOqsyApk (at 2:30)
J— said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:10
In case you were wondering, yes, there has been a seabird-related war. The War of the Pacific (1879-1883) between Chile and Peru and Bolivia is sometimes called the War of Guano and Saltpeter. And a few years earlier, between 1864 and 1866, Peru and Spain fought directly over dung, after Spain took from Peru the poop-rich Chincha Islands. That war is named for the islands.
Candy said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:10
The Truth is but a stinking albatross around the neck of Sadly,No!
Smut Clyde said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:11
females are demure.
I thought ‘demure’ is Latin for “off the wall”.
And all this talk of the Jena 6 has lost me, though I know they make a good 150-mm f/2.8.
Willy said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:12
Pedantic Asshole said,
November 13, 2008 at 23:38
“Technically, in a standard mirror, it’s both refraction and reflection. The light refracts through the glass, reflects off the silvered back plane, and refracts back through the glass.”
This is incorrect, because the plano (i.e. no refractive power) surface of the clear glass does not bend the incoming light before it is reflected, otherwise the mirror would magnify, minify, or distort astigmatically.
What happens at the surface of the clear, plano glass of a mirror (or window, etc.) is transmission, not refraction.
Hey (Pedantic) Asshole, you’re the one that’s wrong. Any ray that does not go normal to the plane of the glass on a back-silvered mirror will refract. That’s everything you see in the mirror that isn’t directly perpendicular with your pupils. [Hint: You're going from air to glass and back again, Snell's law rulez, bitchez.]
And minify…wtf is that coming from a pedantic asshole? Sloppy.
Smut Clyde said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:12
Something something something pouring petrel on the flames something something.
City of New Orleans said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:14
I, for one, am grateful for the protection provided by President Bush since 9/11.
ckc (not kc) said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:15
Or be funny. Your choice.
…you start.
The Ancient Mariner said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:15
Unhand me, grey-beard loon !
Righteous Bubba said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:16
pouring petrel on the flames
Arson! Where’s Anthony Pellicano?
apikores said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:16
Meanwhile, you liberals look foolish and hate filled not to credit Bush for protecting us since 9/11.
Actually, you look like a fucking moron for ignoring the several posts that have demonstrated how false that statement is and pushing on with it as if you haven’t been proved wrong. We look like people who are quoting actual facts to bolster our arguments (see my comment at 19:44, RighteousBubba’s at 20:33).
The El Al Desk at LAX said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:17
I am also glad that Bush has prevented any terrorist attacks from taking place on American soil after 9/11, say, on July 4 of 2002.
ckc (not kc) said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:18
(’cause, you know, we’re having a REALLY hard time determining what, if anything, you might find funny.)
Kathy Nguyen said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:19
If it weren’t for President Bush’s stalwart protection of Americans in the scary post-9/11 world, I would have died of anthr…..oh, wait.
The 9/11 Commission said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:21
During the spring and summer of 2001, President Bush had on several occasions asked his briefers whether any of the threats pointed to the United States. Reflecting on these questions, the CIA decided to write a briefing article summarizing its understanding of this danger. Two CIA analysts involved in preparing this briefing article believed it represented an opportunity to communicate their view that the threat of a Bin Ladin attack in the United States remained both current and serious. The result was an article in the August 6 Presidential Daily Brief titled “Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US.” It was the 36th PDB item briefed so far that year that related to Bin Ladin or al Qaeda, and the first devoted to the possibility of an attack in the United States.
…We have found no indication of any further discussion before September 11 among the President and his top advisers of the possibility of a threat of an al Qaeda attack in the United States. DCI Tenet visited President Bush in Crawford, Texas, on August 17 and participated in PDB briefings of the President between August 31 (after the President had returned to Washington) and September 10. But Tenet does not recall any discussions with the President of the domestic threat during this period.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:22
(’cause, you know, we’re having a REALLY hard time determining what, if anything, you might find funny.)
The phrase “rubber crutch” springs to mind.
mikey said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:25
I’m personally grateful to this otherwise embarrassingly unpleasant thread for allowing me to discover the concept of “Kleptoparasitism”.
I can get a couple of spittle – flecked blog posts out of that one…
mikey
A Different Jake H. said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:25
Teh Truth is clearly dominating the news cycle.
Barack Obama said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:27
I hope Obama keeps the pressure on al Qaeda – I’ve stated here I’d give him credit if he does.
I was staring to have doubts about whether winning the presidency was all worth it, but when I read that The Truth would “give me credit” if I keep up the pressure on Al Queda, suddenly I felt reborn! The whole thing seems worthwhile! At last, I have found my special purpose! Puppies for everyone!
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:27
> Clinton let al Qaeda metastasize and unfortunately we paid the price for that.
Ah, playing the sweet Clenis Card. Soon you’ll be waxing nostalgic over it.
Get ready to start blaming Obama. I heard from Rush that the orders to republican tools are to start blaming him for everything .01 second after he takes the oath of office.
Smut Clyde said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:28
The War of the Pacific (1879-1883) between Chile and Peru and Bolivia is sometimes called the War of Guano and Saltpeter.
Future historians will write about “The War of Batshit Crazy”.
rotten mcdonald said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:29
On the other hand, Bush HAS NOT prevented my right front tire from going flat…
IMPEACH!! IMPEACH!!!
tigrismus said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:29
I thought ‘demure’ is Latin for “off the wall”.
“of or from a mouse”.
SomeNYGuy said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:30
You’ll all be sorry you made fun of me after the inevitable, unstoppable McCain/Palin landslide on November 4th. You’ll have to recognize my great genius and admit you’re all wrong about everything. How sweet it will be when November 4th finally gets here.
Why even the Jena 6 are voting for McCain. He can’t lose!
SomeNYGuy said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:31
Oops, that was supposed to be from “The Truth.” I suck.
ckc (not kc) said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:31
Now, just f’r instance, do you consider THIS funny?
ckc (not kc) said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:36
Perhaps this was one of the fake Truths (if I may phrase it that way). But you see, the problem is that you haven’t shown us enough of your wonderful characteristic wit to be able to distinguish the real (hilariously funny) Truth from the false (distinctly unfunny) Truths.
Candy said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:45
I found this quote somewhat apropos:
The truth only smiles.
.
RUGGED IN MONTANA said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:52
Where’s Anthony Pellicano?
That’s the head rabid pelican, right?
ckc (not kc) said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:52
Perhaps if you started each of your comments with either:
Contains funny.
or
Contains no funny.
of possibly
May contain funny.
we could begin to reply in kind.
ckc (not kc) said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:54
[I'm assuming from the silence that you're working up a good funny.]
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:54
Sometimes the “Seinfeld” quote at the top is very apropos:
“Nah, we need a medical dictionary! If a patient gets difficult, you quone him.”
Samuel Coleridge said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:58
The Truth is but a stinking albatross around the neck of Sadly,No!
That’s what I was tryin’ to tell you guys earlier, but did anyone listen? Hell no!
Permits™³²®© said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:59
Your blogging permits have expired.
All of you go do something else.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:00
of possibly
May contain funny.
May contain funny from Peru, Guatemala, the New Hebrides Islands or the Isles of Langerhans. Assembled in U.S. Funny packaged by weight; some settling may have occured. Do not use if seal is broken. If unsatisfied please return to The California Department of Bedding, P.O. Box 14078, Los Angeles, Texas. Please allow up to 6 weeks for delivery. Use no hooks. Cash value $.001 Offer not good after curfew in Sectors “R” or “N”.
ckc (not kc) said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:00
Mom?
Smut Clyde said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:01
An unintended side-effect of this thread is that whenever in the future* I encounter someone raving about “disgruntled liberals showing their bitterness”, I will wonder what a female littoral waterfowl has to do with it.
* Optional joke about “From heron in” can go here.
Snorghagen said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:01
The poor man is suffering from delusions of rationality.
Smut Clyde said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:02
Samuel Coleridge said,
Oh noes! A library cormorant!
Gustave Flaubert™³²®© said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:02
I know the feeling, Samuel.
Or at least the perception of the feeling.
bughunter said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:03
BREAKING: Kerners are back in business, this time obsessing over Barry H’s SSS Form 1 Document Locator Number, and “how Barry made such a ‘cute’ peace sign with the ‘b’ inside the ‘O’ of his signature. Touching.”
As John Cole put it so aptly :
If this doesn’t describe Schlussel to a tee, I don’t know what does.
Oh. Well maybe this. LOL!
ckc (not kc) said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:07
He seems to have gone … funny.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:14
Get ready for four years of this. They are deranged, and they will stop at nothing. It will be nothing but four years of flinging poo, hoping something will stick. None of them are bright enough to notice that in the process, they covered themselves in shit.
Those who recall the Clinton Administration (unlike comrade Pravda) will want to buckle in. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:18
He seems to have gone … funny.
He “went funny” a long time ago, like a sandwich forgotten in the back of the fridge.
Smut Clyde said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:27
As John Cole put it so aptly :
Cole includes an excerpt from Schlussel:
– That’s the saddest thing I have read all day.
White Man's Burden said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:32
I am incredibly heavy and I am so fortunate that there’s this Rugged in Montana chap to schlep me around.
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:34
I found another tinfoil brigade in its nascent stages whilst perusing the DS site.
democratic-disaster.com
As best as I can figure, this is Ground Zero for the Kerners.
Or maybe it is just a rich source of hilarity for S,N!
I believe determining whether it is the latter, or the former, is one of the deep questions of our time.
Righteous Bubba said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:38
This is high comedy. Or low comedy. One of those.
RUGGED IN FOMALHAUT b said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:39
Berkk! Gssstaddiberk nossstrammmbus colonic!!
PPPEEELLICCAANNNSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Harding Insititute™³²®© said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:43
What?
There’s a Hoover Institute, so what’s the big deal?
Doctorb said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:44
I knew there was something about the Harding Institute! Except I thought that it was a very subtle parody site (I mean, Harding?) and didn’t want to spend hours reading it to get the joke.
Doctorb said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:47
Um, yeah, I are smrt.
kefauver said,
November 14, 2008 at 2:54
God, you’re a MORON -
The Truth said,
November 14, 2008 at 1:10
Look, liberals, what is wrong with you?
Look at Bush’s record:
2001 – One terrorist attack on US soil
2002 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
2003 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
2004 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
2005 – One American city destroyed but NOT by terrorism
2006 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
2007 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
2008 – No terrorist attacks on US soil apart from Yemen Embassy
Can’t you haters give him some credit for all the years where no apocalyptic destruction took place in a major US city?
You forgot to credit him with protecting us from Skrull and Klingon attacks as well. Oh, and shark attacks are down, too.
noen said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:00
Oh, and shark attacks are down, too.
Professional courtesy.
a lesser imp said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:00
Actor212:
Jena is in Louisiana… stop pwning yourself.
The Truth:
Honkies eat shit out of plastic hats.
Rugged in Montana said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:01
Barack Obama and his socialist ilk will screw things up almost immediately upon assuming power. Prepare yourselves for the upcoming 2010 Republican landslide in both houses of Congress.
As I mentioned on a previous thread, Newt Gingrich will likely be the Chairman of the RNC, he’ll weed out the Rinos like Mel Martinez and Ken Mehlmen from postions of power, and enforce a true conservative platform within the Republican Party, with no compromises, as the Rinos will all be purged.
Think a Republican party platform advocating: secure borders and enforcement of ALL immigration laws, energy independence, strict constructionist judges, a balanced budget, a fair tax, deregulation of the private sector, free market solutions for health care, and social security reform.
With Newt Gingrich at the helm, he will ensure that no compromises of conservative principles will take place, therefore ensuring public satisfaction with conservatism, and by default, the Republican party as well.
J— said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:08
This is high comedy. Or low comedy. One of those.
Yes! The Harding Institute makes it to the Big Show! Maybe the New York Times profile of Chief Editor Korir will be next.
PeeJ said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:10
Is this the newest seemingly never-to-end thread?
PeeJ said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:12
We should also thank Bush for the National Cheese Reserve not exploding with atomic force during his tenure. How he managed to prevent it I have no idea but we can presume warrantless wiretapping was the key.
Kathy Nguyen said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:16
1-800-DOCTORB! The “B” is for “Bargain!”
…always cracks me up
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:17
> Is this the newest seemingly never-to-end thread?
If it is, I vote for going back to discussing music.
Much more fun than kicking the flattened corpse of Twoof for the 1000th time.
Here, I’ll start:
I loved that 80’s wave group, referenced above, called “Flock Of Smeagols”
Snorghagen said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:18
What really disturbs me is what my response would be if six harelipped Eskimos beat up a toad-worshipping Andalusian optometrist.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:20
I loved that 80’s wave group, referenced above, called “Flock Of Smeagols”
Weren’t they just precious?
J— said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:20
Except I thought that it was a very subtle parody site (I mean, Harding?) and didn’t want to spend hours reading it to get the joke.
It doesn’t take long to read every single word on that site.
Kathy Nguyen said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:20
Ah, my liberal droogs, you squirm and hand wave, but you can’t address these simple statements:
Shorter DaTwoof: “These are the only two points I have left, because one is so breathtakingly stupid that no one has bothered to shoot it down the way all my other points have been shot down, and the other is so completely irrelevant to the original topic of discussion that no one has bothered to reply.”
I noticed you’re no longer flogging the “Bush protected America post-9/11″ horse…is it possible that you realized how dumb it was making you sound?
Oh well, when President McCain takes office in January, he’ll show all us dumb libtards, right, buddy?
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:20
> We should also thank Bush for the National Cheese Reserve
Oh, you know that protecting the cheese was never on chimpo’s job description. He has had only 2 jobs for the last 8 years:
*) follow Cheney’s orders
*) channel taxpayer money to rich people
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:21
> six harelipped Eskimos
Did Moosey have another litter?
noen said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:22
Is this the newest seemingly never-to-end thread?
If we can talk Brad away from the ledge maybe he could put something up. That Debbie Schlussel exclusive looks familiar.
tigrismus said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:22
This is the thread that has no end
It just goes on and on, my friend
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:24
> This is the thread that has no end
Welcome back my friends….
ELP still RULEZ, doodz!
tigrismus said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:27
ELP still RULEZ, doodz!
Zombie Monteverdi will break his foot OFF in their asses. Please have them return it thereupon.
Righteous Bubba said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:29
ELP still RULEZ, doodz!
YES! EMERSON LAKE AND POWELL FOREVER!
Fred Fiddiddlehop said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:31
If you have any integrity, just imagine your response if six white skinheads beat up a black kid because of some slight.
Nah, you’re imagining this scenario (over and over and over again) enough for everybody.
PeeJ said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:34
ELP still RULEZ, doodz!
Heh. “Someone get me a ladder.” One of my all time favorite worst lyrics. “Bees make honey” is on the list as well.
mikey said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:35
Music, you say?
Classic rock, perhaps?
I give you the Stones, revisited. Apologies to Mick…
If I could stick this blog in my heart
I would spill it all over the t00bz
Would it satisfy ya, another comment by ya
Would you think the Truth is strange? Ain’t he strange?
If I could read ya, if I could believe ya
A talking point so divine
Would it be enough for your right wing heart
If I pointed out you lied? Yes you lied.
I said I know you’re nothing but a troll but I like it
I know you’re nothing but a troll but I like it, like it, yes, I do
Oh, well, I like it, I like it, I like it
I said can’t you see that this old troll is just stupid?
mikey
The Truth said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:48
Wait…I can just type my name as The Truth and it works?
WereBear said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:50
Well, it turns out you can polish a turd!
By modifying an elaborate Japanese technique, updated with refrigeration.
Of course, the words “elaborate,” “Japanese,” “technique, and “updated” continue to put this out of the reach of conservatives.
They long for a past that never was, celebrate a present that doesn’t exist, and beg for a future that would revulse any thinking human.
If hanging around here, calling us “droogs” and “darling” keeps Troofie from contemplating the miserable futility of his very existence, I can muster up some human kindness in the name of beneficient liberalism.
Just… check that sell-by date. After the last eight years, it’s been sitting in the fridge for a while.
(And I made a circular self-reference!)
henry lewis said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:53
If worst, thread and ever were names of seabirds I could make the most amazing pun right now.
Apikores said,
November 14, 2008 at 3:55
Nah, you’re imagining this scenario (over and over and over again) enough for everybody.
Imagining? Hell, I wouldn’t be surprised if he weren’t just imagining it but rather, reliving the good ol’ days in his head, back before the liberal demon DIABEETUS took his foot and he became confined to his basement lair, hobbling out into the fresh air for no more than the duration it takes to wrangle his bulk into the minivan, drive to Sam’s Club to pick up five cases of Cheetoes, and quickly return to safety before the ravenous Negroes eat him alive.
The Truth said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:01
Nothing makes me happier than masturbating frantically to black and white lynching postcards. I used to prefer the latest pictures of splattered hajis that our boys over in Iraq were posting in exchange for free porn over at nowthatsfuckedup.com, but the damn liberal government shut them down, so now I have to settle for the older stuff.
The Truth said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:04
The fact is, I hate myself.
EdsAppliance said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:04
I’m going to go ahead and throw in a Monty Python reference here, just to be all completist about this thread.
“Good morning, I’d like to have an argument, please.”
A Different Jake H. said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:06
Apikores,
Your post led me to the awesome Wilford Brimley Diabeetus Remix. I give it a 93, it’s got a good beat and you can dance to it. But you should check your blood sugar first, if you have the diabeetus.
Apikores said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:10
Pretty sweet. All I can offer in return is this image, which makes me laugh every time i see it….
Apikores said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:10
Ah, damn, that didn’t work. URL is http://incredimazing.com/static/media/2008/08/11/9bf9732d748708f/DontKnowAboutDiabeetus.jpg
Apikores said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:12
Also: http://i171.photobucket.com/albums/u313/nlatham19/diabeetus.jpg
A Different Jake H. said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:20
I LOL’d at Wilford in the black T-shirt. Here’s another techno remix, courtesy of Encyclopedia Dramatica. I give it a 94.5.
handy said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:24
There is so much fail in this thread, and yet…so much anti-fail. Please, continue.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:37
I’m going to go ahead and throw in a Monty Python reference here, just to be all completist about this thread.
“Good morning, I’d like to have an argument, please.”
No, you wouldn’t.
handy said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:37
And back comes the fail.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:39
So far we’ve got my simplistic inquiries and 400+ funny attempts to ignore my sorry conservative ass
Fixed yer typo, Pravda.
dan b said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:53
We really do need a new post here. This one just feels so used and dirty.
Doctorb said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:53
Try to imagine what your reaction would be if:
twelve mulattoes beat up an octaroon.
six sick skinheads scarred a scantily-clad Scientologist.
one Chinese guy beat up six Caucasian cops, using nothing but a hospital gurney.
six Hispanics beat up a Latino over a linguistic squabble.
six Russian dominatrices beat up … uh, some guy.
the winning frustibole team in the 1898 Perth District Amateur Competition attacked the Serjeant-at-Arms of the East Essex Bicycle Fusiliers over groat clenching rights.
MajorKong said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:56
Look at Clintons’s record:
1993 – One terrorist attack on US soil
1994 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
1995 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
1996 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
1997 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
1998 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
1999 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
2000 – No terrorist attacks on US soil
Can’t you haters give him some credit for all the years where no apocalyptic destruction took place in a major US city?
henry lewis said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:56
Doctorb’s entry at 4:53 would make a fitting end to this thread.
Uhh…
Please delete this comment.
MajorKong said,
November 14, 2008 at 4:58
Try to imagine what your reaction would be if:
six Russian dominatrices beat up … uh, some guy.
That was me, but I like that sort of thing.
handy said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:02
MajorKong, Okla. City was in 1995.
But if you meant a terrorist attack by one of them furners, then your point is well taken.
dan b said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:06
Max Mosley?
The Truth said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:08
Checking back in again…Nope, nothing addressing my brave wit.
BTW, I still hate negroes.
The Truth said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:12
Oops, did I say that out loud? Naturally I meant I hate black racism. I just wish my fellow whites would wake up and see the true prejudices in our society, and fight back against them. There I said it.
The white male is the Jew of liberal fascism.
Susan of Texas said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:16
Here’s the real truth:
If you go back far enough we all related.
If you go back far enough we are all the same color.
If you go back far enough we are all the children of God.
How could we not care for and about each other?
Lesley said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:33
I can’t believe you gave that lame troof troll attention on the front page!
Punishment and reward: http://www.flickr.com/photos/creekrunningnorth/2947621463/
Hoosier X said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:36
Back up a second …
What’s Jena got to do with anything?
Ga the Stuffer said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:43
Ayn Rand’s Armored Catfish Squares
Ingredients:
6 jars iron armored catfish
1 tablespoon condensed milk
1 cup yak cheese
3 jars disappointed bear whisker
1 cup basil
4 gallons baking powder
Begin praying. Separate armored catfish liver from carapace. Mock carapace. Use a food processor to mash the yak cheese with the condensed milk. Drizzle resulting mixture over the armored catfish. Find some double cream and drink it. Grate the bear whisker, basil, and the baking powder contrastingly. Spread the latter combination on to the former. Bake for 124 hours. Serves 2 abysmal friends with lazy stomachs.
Snorghagen said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:49
Let me expand on that – one overweight, badly out of shape, fatigued Chinese dwarf with a bad back and a bum lung beat the crap out of the entire municipal police force of Jena, Louisiana.
And I think that Twoof will have to concede that that answers both of his questions, whatever they may be.
Susan of Texas said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:51
And thus gall stones were born.
Nujyeecrseepwook Aptness the Director said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:51
beat the crap out of
Kung Poop.
Susan of Texas said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:55
cow tipping
moo goo gai poop
Candy said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:55
Grate the bear whisker
I read this as bear “whiskey”. Actually sounds good right about now.
Where’s robert green? I want to pitch an idea for a horror movie about Teh Thread That Would Not Die, starring Kelsey Grammar as Teh Twoof. It will be a picture in the slasher/horror genre. Two hours of hell in the theatre, two hours you’ll never get back! Bwahahahahahahaha!
As an aside, that reminded me of a conversation I had with my cousin’s wife, a woman who is a serious Brad Pitt fan:
Me: So, have you seen Seven Years in Tibet yet?
Her: Yep
Me: How was it?
Her: More like Seven Years in the Theatre.
Yix Hooting the Tanner said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:56
Poo Jitsu
Susan of Texas said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:57
Tae Poo Do
Commodore Cherri Alliterative-Sequentializing the Writer said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:58
I saw Swordfish recently and it was as close as I wanna get to seeing G. Gordon Liddy whack off.
Ahmedmikl Squeals the Oncologist said,
November 14, 2008 at 5:59
Capooeira
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:00
Serves 2 abysmal friends with lazy stomachs.
Truly a Fountainhead of nausea.
Candy said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:01
I have to admit it would be difficult to grate bear whiskey, unless it had a really sludgy consistency.
Hey, I took Benedryl. I’ll pass out soon, I promise.
Susan of Texas said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:02
I want to see Liddy and Jonah Goldberg in a cage match. Two men enter, one man leaves. Wait, one man enters, one doughboy skitters in, one man leaves. No–a homicidal maniac enters, guts and cooks the doughboy, and impales imself on his Ginzu knife. The audience leaves.
Susan of Texas said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:04
Bear whiskey–it doesn’t age, it hibernates.
Candy said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:07
I saw Swordfish recently and it was as close as I wanna get to seeing G. Gordon Liddy whack off.
Dear bejebus. Do the doctor’s think they can repair the damage to your eyes?
I want to see Liddy and Jonah Goldberg in a cage match. Two men enter, one man leaves. Wait, one man enters, one doughboy skitters in, one man leaves. No–a homicidal maniac enters, guts and cooks the doughboy, and impales imself on his Ginzu knife. The audience leaves.
That would be a good scene for my movie. Pass the hibernatin’ whiskey and some of RUGGED’s shrooms.
Harding Insititute™³²®© said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:08
Kanzen Gojuryu
Constant Go Poo, You!
Snorghagen said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:09
No, Ben Stein. Wearing only black socks and a Timex.
Quentin-Michaele Kinney-Failures the Software Engineer said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:10
Kenpoo
Hoosier X said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:14
The opinion editor where I work would love this.
Hoosier X said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:15
(Let’s try this again.)
The opinion editor where I work would love this.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:17
No Ben Stein.
No.
Ethan Parkersburg the Retailer said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:18
Look! A normal name!
Also Karatpee
Candy said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:18
No, Ben Stein. Wearing only black socks and a Timex.
There goes the PG rating.
Ethan Parkersburg the Retailer said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:20
There goes the PG rating.
Pelican Guidance.
handy said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:34
They already made that movie, and it bombed.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:42
They already made that movie, and it bombed.
Holy fucking Jesus on toast with benzedrine, is the “Michael Moore” movie in that film really titled “Die You American Pig”?
Oh, my. Some edgy satire, that is.
RUGGED IN FOMALHAUT b said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:49
Bzzzrt! Craaaaaapoooteriakkzt, nembutal ala groznertkissperk. Flavorine. (heh).
robert green said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:52
this thread is fully what the fuck.
Candy said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:53
I said earlier that even Orcinus’s trollership was down, and now I go over there and find an honest to goodness Council on Foreign Relations conspiracy theory troll bringing teh crazee.
I think I’ll go to bed now and dream of the new world order.
robert green said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:54
ok, the thread that would not die. kelsey grammar at the truth, patricia heaton as rugged in montana, brad r played by brad pitt.
i smell a
shit.Harding Insititute™³²®© said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:56
Bwa Ha Ha!
Good night, peeps.
NOBODY GIVES A FLYING FUCK ABOUT JENA 6, YOU PATHETIC HACKY FLAILING MICROPENISED DUMBSHIT said,
November 14, 2008 at 6:58
NOBODY GIVES A FLYING FUCK YOU FUCKING MORON. WHAT WAS ALL THAT SHIT ABOUT MCCAIN WINNING? DURRRRR, WHOOPSIE! NOW GO PLAY IN TRAFFIC, TITTIEBABY
the_millionaire_lebowski said,
November 14, 2008 at 7:04
This post sucks
Candy said,
November 14, 2008 at 7:04
patricia heaton as rugged? I dig it. She cries a lot too.
getting the animal trainers to handle the badgers and pelicans might be challenging.
jim said,
November 14, 2008 at 7:06
OT, & scary as fuck:
The world is now being menaced by brown clouds.
Fuck, you have no idea how much I wish this was a joke – but April 1st is a long long ways away right now.
Snorghagen said,
November 14, 2008 at 7:34
The world is also menaced by brown poop
g said,
November 14, 2008 at 8:04
Dang, y’all have been busy while I’ve been in the air.
I didn’t read all 534 comments. Did Twoofy show up?
Lesley said,
November 14, 2008 at 8:23
Is this althouse’s way of saying she voted for McCain?
Lately she’s been posting a lot of harsh criticism of Obama, even attacking him over the puppy promise.
Lesley said,
November 14, 2008 at 8:31
I wish I could punch Althouse and her many rethugulame commenters in the nose. Lame Ass Bitch.
henry lewis said,
November 14, 2008 at 8:46
Did Twoofy show up?
Never heard of him.
RUGGED IN MONTANA said,
November 14, 2008 at 10:34
kelsey grammar at the truth, patricia heaton as rugged in montana, brad r played by brad pitt
Wait………….you mean Rugged played by Brad Pitt, right?
I could see that.
owlbear1 said,
November 14, 2008 at 10:59
So, RUGGED does that mean you want Ed Norton for your role?
RUGGED IN MONTANA said,
November 14, 2008 at 11:05
So, RUGGED does that mean you want Ed Norton for your role?
You mean the guy from the Honeymooners? Yeah, I guess I could live with that (though the bar they hung out in was nuthin like The Blood Clot).
owlbear1 said,
November 14, 2008 at 11:23
Yep, that’s the Ed I was talking about.
Rev. Bob said,
November 14, 2008 at 11:35
Please don’t tell Republicans this or we’re doomed next election: the Republicans lost because they weren’t conservative enough.
Shhh. Don’t tell them.
The Truth in 1865 said,
November 14, 2008 at 12:03
Huh, 500 posts – all a pathetic and unfunny attempt to go on about my statement that the South would win because God supports Her just cause.
When are you liberals going to answer my pertininent enquiries about the perfidy of Yankee carpetbaggers?
The Truth in 1945 said,
November 14, 2008 at 12:06
When are you liberals and fellow travellers going to answer my questions about Roosevelet’s secret agreement with the Reds in Europe? Huh?
Instead, gee golly, just 500 posts without a trace of humour to match mine all going on about the time I said the United States had no business interfering with Mr. Hitler’s legitimate pursuit of his national interests and that we should take care the Jews/Reds don’t drag us into a European war.
The Truth in 1970 said,
November 14, 2008 at 12:08
500 posts you bums have churned out pathetically trying to divert me and ask me about my prediction of a swift US victory over the Viet Cong in two weeks back in 65.
When will you admit that Alger Hiss was a Goddamn Russian agent?
The Truth in 1783 said,
November 14, 2008 at 12:12
Well I come here to read your replies and I see nary a single statement responding to my oft repeated point that the tarring and feathering of customs officials is a sin and a crime. Why will you radicals not admit this? What of morality?
Instead I see common folk vainly pointing to my earlier pamphlet of 1775:
“Why our Glorious Majesty King George will Swiftly Crush the Boston Rabble and the Falsely-Named Patriots”
The Truth in 1929 said,
November 14, 2008 at 12:18
Well, I see none og you clowns at Sadly, No can respond to my charge that it is wrong for Catholics to attack a man because he is of Protestant stock.
No, you liberals would complain bitterly if it were an Irishman or some shiftless Italian that were the victim, wouldn’t you?
Golly – nearly 600 poor attempts at humour and citing my article from January about the invincible strength of America’s stock market, “Buy property in Florida now!”
I can’t wait to see the looks on your faces when Herbert Hoover wins again!
Alex Higgins said,
November 14, 2008 at 12:47
The Truth,
here you go:
Ah, my liberal droogs, you squirm and hand wave, but you can’t address these simple statements:
We cannot address these statements? Are you sure?
(1)I hope Obama keeps the pressure on al Qaeda – I’ve stated here I’d give him credit if he does. Why does that worry or bother you liberals so much? It is a very interesting trend and worth further exploration how liberals are lowering homeland security expectations for Obama.
I don’t think liberals – not claiming to speak for all of them and you should not be so pretentious as to address all of them in one post – are bothered by your claim of high expectations for Obama.
On the contrary, it has been noted and your words will be returned you to you as soon as you break your pledge to give him credit.
(2) If you have any integrity, just imagine your response if six white skinheads beat up a black kid because of some slight.
I would be disgusted obviously, and equally so if the situation was reversed. The guy in this case should not have been assaulted even if it was true that he was engaged in acts of racist intimidation. However, because liberals are not usually wilfully ignorant of social context and the connection between cause and effect we would not seek to construct an anti-civil rights argument on the basis of such an incident and would pay attention to the other claims being made about what happened in Jena.
And there you have it. Straight answers to what you claim are your unanswered and unanswerable points.
Now I think there is a lot of snark in your inbox you may wish to respond to if you have any integrity or personal honesty.
In addition you have been asked in Brad’s post addressed to you to acknowledge your claims about the US election and explain yourself. You have avoided the subject entirely for a staggering period of time.
Everybody can see you are avoiding this. Everybody. And you know we can see your evasion.
You have no excuses left.
If the next words out of your mouth are about Jena or al Qaeda your fail will be so huge that it will be recorded forever in the Book of Fail.
kiki said,
November 14, 2008 at 13:21
Can’t believe no one said Poo Shu.
bellatrys said,
November 14, 2008 at 14:11
Seven white kids just *killed* a Latino man after they went out looking for “Mexicans” to bash. Where’s Truth’s endless outrage about *this* act of white brutality?
Or is, perhaps, Truth in truth nothing but a bigoted hypocrite?
Slim Tyranny said,
November 14, 2008 at 14:19
This thread is awesome; the troll is even awesomer. He must really be sad and lonely, but at least he’s trying hard to make internet friends.
Till said,
November 14, 2008 at 14:54
Holy fuck, that happened in Patchogue?
Newsday has all the details…which really make me wish I still lived in Suffolk County, so I could vote against some of those dumb fucks in local government.
ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said,
November 14, 2008 at 14:59
The rethugs must be very proud of the results of their race-baiting.
A**holes..
justme said,
November 14, 2008 at 15:02
bellatrys,
Looks like Toofie may have already chimed in on that subject. I think he’s the first comment on that story,
Can’t be too careful about them homos, you know.
justme said,
November 14, 2008 at 15:07
Oh, if anybody hasn’t seen this yet, it’s a must-peruse.
The Yes Men are teh funny.
(Lex) Palianated (Azagthoth) said,
November 14, 2008 at 15:12
The Troof has tried to go historical now. Heaven help us. Or SN writers……new thread? Please?
Az said,
November 14, 2008 at 15:40
“500+ posts. I win. Goodnight, liberals.”
Awesome wingnut logic . Just as McCain won by not losing 538 to nothing and Republicans won by managing not to lose all 35 senate seats .
The Truth , tell me why we should engage in a discussion with you when you are so consistently wrong . You can keep on yammering but you were dead wrong about everything that was decided on concrete results . It’s just like wingnut comment on the election night . Your friends kept on complaining that media were calling states based just on exit polls ( obviously stuff like WPE is too difficult for people who pride themselves on being ignorant ) . If anybody would have tried to argue with them they would just have kept on spewing bullshit . Turns out that the media were right all along . Similarly rightwing blogs gave all four debates to McCain/Palin but polls suggest exactly the opposite . You said that polls were wrong and Obama’s lead was just a result of media bias . How did that turn out ?
We know that there is no point in “discussing’ something with the likes of you who keep on making their own reality . Our purpose is to mock you , to laugh our asses off at you . Earlier you get that better for you .
Ethan Parkersburg the Retailer said,
November 14, 2008 at 15:46
“500+ posts. I win. Goodnight, liberals.”
Awesome wingnut logic .
It’s not wingnut logic, it’s troll logic, and obviously it’s a win.
Honus said,
November 14, 2008 at 15:54
Truth:
“While you’re at it, can you tell me exactly what speech leads to an acceptable felony assault and what doesn’t?”
I believe the correct legal term is “fighting words” utterance of which by the victim is a defense to a battery charge. Also, “Assault” doesn’t assume physical contact. If you want to argue law, either get an education, or go to a wingnut site.
henry lewis said,
November 14, 2008 at 16:00
it’s troll logic, and obviously it’s a win.
And there was much rejoicing in the troll market.
tigrismus said,
November 14, 2008 at 16:13
The Truth , tell me why we should engage in a discussion with you when you are so consistently wrong .
You shouldn’t. This has been another edition &c.
MzNicky said,
November 14, 2008 at 16:23
Oh good Lord don’t tell me this thread is still going on. That’s it, I’m taking my coffee and going to the Rude Pundit for a while. Yeah, that’s right! I’m leaving you, S,N! I’ll be back when you take out the garbage and put on a clean shirt like you promised!
You Can't Put Lipstick On A Repig said,
November 14, 2008 at 16:23
> This is a Hate crime. These creeps should be on death row….But so are all the killings of at least two million Americans by illegal aliens
Conservatives decry moral equivalency except when they don’t.
Az said,
November 14, 2008 at 16:33
“It’s not wingnut logic, it’s troll logic, and obviously it’s a win.”
Normally yes , but seeing that this thread is created expressely for the purpose of grabbing Troofie by the ankles and smashing his head against the wall I don’t see how he can view this as win unless he is a masochist .
But wait , I stand corrected . Of course he is .
See how the hunter becomes the hunted said,
November 14, 2008 at 16:40
This thread is a collaborative tactical effort to out-troll the trolls.
The original post lured The Troll into a quagmire from which it has no exit strategy.
As the blatantly false premise on which the Troll began his aggression has collapsed he finds himself caught in a nightmare world where friend and foe are indistinguishable and from which he must struggle to leave.
Stay, Troll. Tell us more about the wrongness of liberals. Stay here with us.
Jim Morrison said,
November 14, 2008 at 16:42
Five to one, troll, one in five. No Troll here gets out alive. You got the guns but, we got the numbers.
The Truth said,
November 14, 2008 at 16:50
I have no fucking idea what the world “polite” means.
Ethan Parkersburg the Retailer said,
November 14, 2008 at 16:52
The original post lured The Troll into a quagmire from which it has no exit strategy.
Trolls don’t want to exit, they want to make you write stuff.
Alex Higgins said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:00
Troll,
I responded to your “very straightforward questions” at 12:47.
Done.
You changed the subject again. Fail.
Election result, Truth. The election result. Yes, that one. I’m off work sick today, no hurry.
Nietzsche said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:13
Our troll here has not so much entered a quagmire as he is caught in the eternal recurrence.
Consider his existential dilemma.
He made a vain boast about a distinct historical event in the future. He was wrong, and his error was both a logical culmination of arrogance but more than – a worldview so massively in conflict with reality that it could only produce false conclusions.
Since reality now contests such a boast so fiercely – and he must surely remember – his opponents confront him with it and he has to face the prospect that he was wrong not only on this point but in his general outlook.
With insufficient strength to contemplate such a disaster, such a horror, he instead retreats to vainly accusing his opponents of indifference to racial assault in a particular case.
Since this accusation is also false, his opponents do not deign to respond to it driectly. He thus finds his opportunity – to carry on the accusation, while they in turn will return to the original point.
Meanwhile, the troll is momentarily encouraged by fighting an imaginary demon – a Dr. Dick – and this victory – or perceived victory – creates the illusion that he has achieved something by continuing to return to his diversion and false premise.
Thus he remains, recirculating the same argument over and over and over again and again, imagining he has achieved a victory and protecting himself from acknowledging that he has ever said anything wrong.
If the Devil himself were to be trapped in such a cycle would you not weep tears for him? Would you not cry out in horror and pull your hair at the thought of such a fate and condemn those who spur him on as wicked?
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:23
Second, why are liberals campaigning on behalf of the felons that committed the Jena 6 assault?
Why are you defending the felon that was beaten up? Didn’t he have it coming?
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:27
Jena is in Louisiana… stop pwning yourself.
Pointing out the mote in my eye, while not noticing the log in your own, Troofie?
LOL!
Poor Troofie.
Nietzsche said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:31
There we go – at post 573, Truth, you actually acknowledged what the entire thread was about even if you did so, so partially as not to acknowledge anything you had previously said on the subject.
You’re making progress. Continue, and maybe we’ll get round to your chosen topics.
Keep going. The election and the Republican Party first – that was the topic of the thread – then the other stuff.
N.C. said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:36
I think what The Truth doesn’t see or is continually eliding is that there are two different parts to the reaction to the Jena 6 situation: yes, it is bad that six black teenagers assaulted a white teenager for race-bias reasons, but simultaneously it is bad that law enforcement threw the book at them and attempted to make examples of them by doing things like charging them as adults, charging them with attempted murder and ruling that sneakers are deadly weapons, especially considering the conditions that brought about the assault. Those seven teenagers didn’t exist in a vacuum.
Like Amanda Marcotte says, this isn’t an either/or blog.
Az said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:39
“Hi, Alex. Obama won the election”
But we were told that was impossible .
Alex Higgins said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:43
Yeah, what “Nietzsche” said.
Truth, you gave the briefest possible response just now to the topic of Brad’s whole post and about a couple hundred inquiries. Then you demand more from me when I answered your points head on.
You need to face the election prediction first. Your topics come second.
Simba B said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:44
You know who needs to make an appearance in this thread? Coach Urban Meyer.
Az said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:45
“I think what The Truth doesn’t see or is continually eliding is that there are two different parts to the reaction to the Jena 6 situation: yes, it is bad that six black teenagers assaulted a white teenager for race-bias reasons, but simultaneously it is bad that law enforcement threw the book at them and attempted to make examples of them by doing things like charging them as adults, charging them with attempted murder and ruling that sneakers are deadly weapons, especially considering the conditions that brought about the assault.”
Add to it the fact that there is no equivalence between what individuals did and what the establishment did .
Iris said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:46
What, only Secretary of State?
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:50
The sad incident that bellatrys refers to above is a perfect example of liberal hypocrisy.
Riiiiiiiiiiight, because New Yorkers let the Central Park Jogger case just go by quietly.
Shut up, dickhead. Go get some learnin’…
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:50
Actor212, I think you better talk to NC. He seems to think that the victim of the Jena 6 thugs was an actual victim for “race-bias reasons”, and not as you say someone who brought it on himself. I’ll let you liberals sort that out amongst yourselves – nah, I think I’ll just let you pwn yourself some more.
TRANSLATION – “I’m getting my ass kicked on the facts here.”
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:52
not as you say someone who brought it on himself.
I said no such thing, Troofie.
I asked YOU to provide proof that he was innocent of any racial bias. Now, I don’t know about you, but it seems to me that standard is slightly different than “taking a stand”.
I’m still waiting.
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 17:53
Come on, Troofie! This entire thread was devoted and designed to be all about you.
You’re the one on trial here. It’s been fun watching you wriggle, squirm and spew, but put up or shut up.
And I’m sure we’d all prefer the latter.
tigrismus said,
November 14, 2008 at 18:01
If worst, thread and ever were names of seabirds I could make the most amazing pun right now.
Would parrots do? Worcester’s throated Everett’s.
mikey said,
November 14, 2008 at 18:03
Still arguing about the freakin jena six with an internet troll?
Shit.
I’m following MzNicky…
mikey
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 18:05
C’mon, Mikey, even championship boxers have to spare with a dummy.
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 18:05
Errr, spar.
Nietzsche said,
November 14, 2008 at 18:07
“Nietzche, what nonsense. I was on here on election night talking about what Obama’s victory meant. My goal here is to point out your hypocrisy, which is fun and easy, and I discussed the unfortunate reality of Carter’s second term last week.”
Eternal Recurrence!
One can suppose that some right-wing blog with a thread about OJ Simpson also has a liberal troll who has turns up to discuss the hypocrisy of Republicans creating a deficit after preaching fiscal responsibility. That would be as preposetrous as your declared goal.
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 18:08
If the Devil himself were to be trapped in such a cycle would you not weep tears for him? Would you not cry out in horror and pull your hair at the thought of such a fate and condemn those who spur him on as wicked?
You might applaud them for containing the Devil in one place where an eye can be kept on him.
Erik W said,
November 14, 2008 at 18:16
THE END
OneMan said,
November 14, 2008 at 18:21
“ok, the thread that would not die. kelsey grammar at the truth, patricia heaton as rugged in montana, brad r played by brad pitt.”
Ooh, ooh! Gilbert Gottfried as Lonny Martello.
Whom I wish would make an appearance here.
Either that or a new thread (please!)
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 18:21
Wow.
BTW, as if you didn’t already know, Glenn Back is still a tool.
Bloggers pushing their books is one thing – when you do it every five minutes on your three-hour nationwide show? Nothing but pitiful.
Pere Ubu said,
November 14, 2008 at 18:22
Isn’t this the point in the thread where Brad wakes up next to Susan Pleshette?
N.C. said,
November 14, 2008 at 18:25
Actor212, I think you better talk to NC. He seems to think that the victim of the Jena 6 thugs was an actual victim for “race-bias reasons”, and not as you say someone who brought it on himself. I’ll let you liberals sort that out amongst yourselves – nah, I think I’ll just let you pwn yourself some more.
Yeah, I think I’d rather talk to someone who discusses things in good faith. Thanks for the tip!
The Trooth said,
November 14, 2008 at 18:49
Me and Rugged are gonna go have pure white babies together. Unless when that black man touched me once when he was giving me change, he made me black, which will make me have BLACK babies, which will make me and my sheet-wearing lover have to abandon them because no black babies have fathers.
The Truth said,
November 14, 2008 at 20:27
This is just the sort of immaturity I expect from the “Heckuva Job” Left…. wait, did I really try and attribute that comment to the Left? “Heckuva Job”? How stupid and mindless in your attempts to simply lash out at people you hate to not know or care about the fact that it was in fact, George W. Bush who said that, about one of his own appointees? Surely I’m not that retarded?
Except… sadly, yes! I am. Sorry folks.
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 21:16
Troooooooooooooooooofieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Oh, Troooooooooooooooooooofieeeeeeeeeeee!
Here boy! Cmere, boy!
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 21:42
Troofie, you’re a lying dissembling prick. You mock my one error, yet you never apologize for your smears or mischaracterizations, or your lies.
YOu’re toast, son. I kicked your ass up and down this blog, and you STILL haven’t proven how that felon of a “victim”, Justin Barker, was innocent of racism.
It is YOU who is the embarrassment. I’m just going to stick your nose in it and make you smell it, dog.
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 21:43
Troll ass kicked? Check.
Oh, and Troofie?
NOTE: Your ass has been kicked by Actor212 (a wholly owned subsidiary of Actor212 Enterprises, a Cayman Islands corporation)
Now dance for me, beeyatch.
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 22:16
Watch
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 22:17
Troofie
actor212 said,
November 14, 2008 at 22:20
Dance over to this thread with each tick up in the comment count!
Busted ya, Troofie! Silly boy, you’ve just danced for me!
ckc (not kc) said,
November 15, 2008 at 0:08
…I imagine your confusion and smile
hmmm, are we getting close to learning what you think is funny?
ckc (not kc) said,
November 15, 2008 at 0:14
(my suspicion is that it involves flies and wings and suchlike)
owlbear1 said,
November 15, 2008 at 1:49
hmmm, are we getting close to learning what you think is funny?
(my suspicion is that it involves flies and wings and suchlike)
.
Licking his fingers between each tug and giggling no doubt.
Apikores said,
November 16, 2008 at 22:18
Wow. That was fun.
Lexaburn said,
November 24, 2008 at 11:27
Yeah, I remember Da Troof.
Dumb bastard taunting people with polls and shit like that.
I thought it was someone on here punkin’ everyone.
You mean to tell me that an idiot that idiotic actually exists and that fact isn’t a joke?
Shit, next thing you know Obama will have legitimately won the election and all those millions illegal-immigrant African relatives of his – some of whom ARE supporters of that Islam stuff – never got the chance to pull of the scam. I see they caught his auntie, but did they catch the rest?
Maybe…just maybe white muthafuckas actually voted for this dude Obama.
Oh shit! That’s amazing!
Damn. It must’ve been a lot of ‘em.
Troof, tell me that you are a real poll-purveying dingbat so that I’ll know that some of these nice white muthafuckas actually voted for Obama.