Jun
9
9
(Whistling Dixie)
From a nameless blog that we forget where it was (aaah-[sondra k]-CHOO!) and certainly cannot link to.
**for extra-added bonus….
my Gadsden tattoo was called “some biker thing” on the same Oui Todd blog the above quote came from! A BIKER THING?????????? HAAAAAAAAAA…I think some one needs to brush up a bit on their American History!
From comments:
oh, yeah — that from someone who would piss himself if a real biker so much as looked at him. bahahahahahaha — real inside knowledge, there “normie”
Posted by Claire at June 9, 2005 10:10 AM

Rest in peace, GG






Brad R. said,
June 9, 2005 at 19:38
Hey Gav, er, Trunkrocket, who’s the guy on the right? Yosef?
Yosef said,
June 9, 2005 at 19:48
Your right or my right?
Gavin M. said,
June 9, 2005 at 19:50
That’s Mykel Board. I think ____ ____, the uh, conservative blogger mentioned in comments earlier, was at this show.
This ‘Trunkrocket’ thing isn’t working out, is it? What if we both call ourselves ‘Adam Yoshida’ and see if Adam swings by to complain?
Yosef said,
June 9, 2005 at 19:52
If Yoshi comes by, would that bring Seb out, seeing as how they’re both Canadians?
zuzu said,
June 9, 2005 at 20:10
Whoa! Someone needs to close a tag!
Bosco said,
June 9, 2005 at 20:11
Holy crap, is that GG Allin?
Gavin M. said,
June 9, 2005 at 20:12
Zuzu:
What, is the page not working ok?
zuzu said,
June 9, 2005 at 20:20
It was working fine, just all italicized.
Though now it’s fixed, so my comment looks stupid.
Where are you seeing pictures of SondraK and her flash tattoos?
SondraK said,
June 9, 2005 at 20:30
So BIKERS are GOOD now, and NOT an insult? I’m soooooooooooo confused! BTW, leaving self-links in comments is COMMENT SPAM and is treated accordingly.
Boy, you people are obcessed. Truly scaring me now. Do a Google search for mental disorders…I’m sure yours will come up and you can get the help you need:)
Good luck!
spencer said,
June 9, 2005 at 20:35
I’m soooooooooooo confused!
Well, if your blogging and commenting style are any indication of your mental state, I can’t say I’m surprised one bit . . .
Gavin M. said,
June 9, 2005 at 20:36
(whistling a lazy tune)
spencer said,
June 9, 2005 at 20:43
Yeah, Gav, but it’s okay if you’re a Republican . . . right?
verplanck colvin said,
June 9, 2005 at 20:44
Mr. Trunkrocket, how do you treat “COMMENT SPAM” around here? Is it OK to point and laugh?
wha? said,
June 9, 2005 at 20:54
I thought I called it a “biker whore tattoo”. I think I may have described it as having a snake or some kind of crap like that on it as well. If she was trying to quote me, she kind of missed the mark. Normal for the right I guess. Anyway, yesterday she’s southern belle, today she’s super-biker. Everyday is something new, but it’s all in her imagination. That’s the sad part of it - they’re all completely and utterly divorced from reality. Living in a fantasy world. Delusional. Truth of the matter is that she’s no more belle than she is biker, than she is warrior, than she is princess; that is to say, she’s none of those things except in her own head. In reality, she’s just another angry, aging, bitch. Sorry, child, no matter how many of your sondra-ettes you have joining in your fantasies, they just ain’t gonna come true. Calm down, take a walk, maybe have some ice cream, and try to forget about us mean ole Sadly, No folks.
Liberal Moonbat said,
June 9, 2005 at 20:58
“Sorry, child, no matter how many of your sondra-ettes you have joining in your fantasies, they just ain’t gonna come true. Calm down, take a walk, maybe have some ice cream, and try to forget about us mean ole Sadly, No folks.”
Shhh! You’ll scare her away!
Kristin Sausville said,
June 9, 2005 at 21:05
Sondra, I do not know what “obcessed” means. Please provide a definition before making accusations.
verplanck colvin said,
June 9, 2005 at 21:12
Forget the ice cream. Based on my recent reading of Ms. Pawlik’s web page, what she needs is a packet of powdered ranch dressing and an 8 oz brick of cream cheese. The lactose and MSG acts as a calming agent.
Gavin M. said,
June 9, 2005 at 21:16
From: GOP#1
Email: shhhh!@notsadlyno.com
Hi Sondra,
We are really enjoying the ass-kicking you’re giving to those moonbat jerks at Sadly, No.
The liberal moonbats are traitors and hate America. They must be exposed.
We are eagerly awaiting more ass-kicking of moonbats!
Signed,
GOP #1
=========
Crushingly, she seems to have blacklisted us.
What did we do wrong?!
FlipYrWhig said,
June 9, 2005 at 21:42
Sondra, I do not know what “obcessed” means.
It means that there’s a painful, pus-filled pocket of mental fixation under the surface. Etymology: Obsess + abscess. Usage: SondraK is obcessed with Sadly, No!
Vestal Vespa said,
June 9, 2005 at 21:59
It’s not kind to make fun of the mentally handicapped.
You mean like saying “Oui Todd?”
zuzu said,
June 9, 2005 at 22:05
C’mon, really, where’s the picture?
Gavin M. said,
June 9, 2005 at 22:10
Of the tattoo? It’s on her page. I think you have to scroll down a bit.
zuzu said,
June 9, 2005 at 22:57
Damn, I’m not seeing it unless it’s that gun thing.
Mostly I see a lot of hair and camos.
Helper said,
June 10, 2005 at 0:30
you have to scroll waaaay down, like 2/3s of the way down the page. It is a ‘don’t tread on me’ snake along with a rune that looks like an inverted peace sign and ‘9-11′.
It definitely looks like the kind of tattoo that Asian prostitutes are given to make it clear to everyone what profession they are in. (not that I think Sondra k is a whore, but she does have a whore’s tattoo
CraigC said,
June 10, 2005 at 3:15
Well, once again, the loving, tolerant, humanist left shows its true colors. Had to go right to the “whore card,” huh? Wha and Helper, you’re both disgusting pigs. You don’t know the first thing about Sondra. She’s a sweet, caring person who does a lot of things for others, including a whole lot of things for the troops. But then, you wouldn’t know anything about that, would you? Because the troops are just brainwashed hayseeds doing Amerikkka’s bidding in its quest for world domination and oppression of the poor little brown people.
One thing she doesn’t like, though, and neither do her readers, is some ignorant little troll shitting at her website. It’s easy to hide behind a computer and call someone a whore, isn’t it, little man? And don’t give me any hair-splitting crap about how you didn’t call her a whore, Helper. At least Wha was up front about it. You’re fucking lucky that we don’t know where you live, asswipe.
CraigC said,
June 10, 2005 at 3:17
And by the way, about that “whore?” That’s some shit you’ll never even get close to. It really bugs you guys that we have the hot babes, doesn’t it?
FlipYrWhig said,
June 10, 2005 at 3:19
And it’s, what, *difficult* to hide behind a computer and issue tough-guy threats? Lighten up, Francis.
CraigC said,
June 10, 2005 at 3:43
Yes, it’s very difficult. It’s been a real emotional roller-coaster.
zuzu said,
June 10, 2005 at 3:58
Well, once again, the loving, tolerant, humanist left shows its true colors.
Loving, tolerant and humanist /= doormat.
zuzu said,
June 10, 2005 at 4:13
And whoever said Sondra’s tattoo looked like a whore’s tattoo was wrong (I finally was able to make it out).
That little scribble has nothing on traditional Japanese tattooing, commonly worn by whores.
CraigC said,
June 10, 2005 at 4:24
So, not being a doormat equals calling someone a whore?
zuzu said,
June 10, 2005 at 4:39
Who called someone a whore?
Links, please.
Hokie said,
June 10, 2005 at 4:48
You have the hot babes? Heh heh heh…
CraigC said,
June 10, 2005 at 4:49
Well then, what did you mean when you said And whoever said Sondra’s tattoo looked like a whore’s tattoo was wrong? Just scroll up. Jesus Christ, it’s like talking to ten-year-olds.
CraigC said,
June 10, 2005 at 4:51
Yeah, let’s see, Susan Estrich, Andrea Dworkin, Madeleine Albright….need I go on?
Socraticsilence said,
June 10, 2005 at 6:11
As opposed to hotties like Phyllis Schflay and Jeanne Kirkpatrick right Craig?
CraigC said,
June 10, 2005 at 6:45
You don’t really want to get into this discussion, do you?
Tom v G said,
June 10, 2005 at 7:27
Are we talking hotties from left vs. right??
Jeanine vs. Annie C?? Arriana vs. Eva?? Cho vs. Malkin (ok, take away 2 pc points for that one, but Malkin and crackers por moi, please); and, with love, are those Sarandon’s breasts, or her knees.
SondraK vs. Anna Marie Cox in a steel cage above the ring.
ps. I’ve got one word for you - Eleanor.
maryc said,
June 10, 2005 at 9:33
Ashley Judd vs ANYONE the GOP care to offer!
: )
maryc said,
June 10, 2005 at 9:34
Oh, I almost forgot. I’ve got one word for you:
Barbara
(Well..okay one more word, cuz its a common name: Bush)
Kirsty said,
June 10, 2005 at 11:28
“obcessed” we are indeed, Sondra. What with your random capitalization, peculiar grammar and crappy tattoos, scaring us you are.
And Craig - “it really bugs you guys that we have the hot babes, doesn’t it?” Um, no, actually. I AM a “hot babe” as you so charmingly put it and quite frankly I think you need to raise your standards. But then, beggars can’t be choosers.
Anyone else think it’s oddly meaningful that while I was reading Sondra and Craig’s ramblings and flicking through radio stations the first actual song that I came across was Pink Floyd’s “Run like hell”?
Anne said,
June 10, 2005 at 15:29
I think the idea of comparing parties based on the “hotness” of “their women” is pretty idiotic. So it’s been funny lately to see Cotillion members, for example, immediately citing their “hotness” as somehow winning the argument for them.
Loving, tolerant and humanist /= doormat.
Thank you, zuzu.
flea said,
June 10, 2005 at 18:38
Ah, the “our women are hotter” argument. The only real difference between liberal men and conservative men is that while the majority of both believe that a woman’s only value is in her looks, liberal men at least have the sense to feel slightly ashamed of having this argument in public.
zuzu said,
June 10, 2005 at 20:59
And Craig - “it really bugs you guys that we have the hot babes, doesn’t it?” Um, no, actually. I AM a “hot babe” as you so charmingly put it and quite frankly I think you need to raise your standards.
If you “have” the “hot babes,” that means that the hot babes aren’t really part of your group, right?