<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Awesome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rorycalhoun</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-702632</link>
		<dc:creator>rorycalhoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-702632</guid>
		<description>Damn it tohell.  I thought we libs were already in charge of everything already.  That&#039;s what the right wing conspiracy nuts have been screaming for the last 35 years.  And they&#039;re hardly ever wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn it tohell.  I thought we libs were already in charge of everything already.  That&#8217;s what the right wing conspiracy nuts have been screaming for the last 35 years.  And they&#8217;re hardly ever wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701987</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701987</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Posting this so The Truth doesn&#039;t even have to make an appearance Says:
October 7th, 2008 at 17:20 &lt;/i&gt;

... but how will he EVER get that &quot;free&quot; McCain tote-bag?

He&#039;s falling behind his scheduled flame-quota, &amp; time is running out!

How DO you e-mail a puppy, anyway? By November 5th he&#039;s going to want SOMEONE around that isn&#039;t pointing &amp; laughing.

(concur heartily on erecting a juiceblogging-post for the impending &lt;strike&gt;talking-point competition&lt;/strike&gt; Town-Hall Meeting, BTW)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Posting this so The Truth doesn&#8217;t even have to make an appearance Says:<br />
October 7th, 2008 at 17:20 </i></p>
<p>&#8230; but how will he EVER get that &#8220;free&#8221; McCain tote-bag?</p>
<p>He&#8217;s falling behind his scheduled flame-quota, &amp; time is running out!</p>
<p>How DO you e-mail a puppy, anyway? By November 5th he&#8217;s going to want SOMEONE around that isn&#8217;t pointing &amp; laughing.</p>
<p>(concur heartily on erecting a juiceblogging-post for the impending <strike>talking-point competition</strike> Town-Hall Meeting, BTW)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MzNicky</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701961</link>
		<dc:creator>MzNicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701961</guid>
		<description>biff diggerence = ratfucker manqué.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>biff diggerence = ratfucker manqué.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Nation Of Whiners</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701952</link>
		<dc:creator>A Nation Of Whiners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701952</guid>
		<description>Multifarious avenues of approach vie for attention as potential retorts to Prof. Gary D. Ruppert, Esq.&#039;s uncongenial protests. Let me start by stressing that I am not attempting to suppress anyone&#039;s opinions, nor do I intend to demean Prof. Ruppert personally for his beliefs or worldviews. But I do maintain that I must acknowledge that Prof. Ruppert&#039;s apparatchiks will have to stop shouting &quot;Me, me!&quot; and learn to harmonize on &quot;Us, us!&quot;. We should not concern ourselves with his putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and with the fact that if Prof. Ruppert sincerely believes that the majority of loathsome wantwits are heroes, if not saints, then he must be smoking something illegal.

We must confront and reject all manifestations of factionalism. Those who claim otherwise do so only to justify their own irascible perorations. Prof. Ruppert has been trying to convince us that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors. This pathetic attempt to crush people to the earth and then claim the right to trample on them forever because they are prostrate deserves no comment other than to say that Prof. Ruppert likes thinking thoughts that aren&#039;t burdensome and that feel good. That&#039;s why he never seems to listen to anyone else&#039;s positions and reasoning. Well, that&#039;s another story. To get back to my main point, I ought to mention that all the deals Prof. Ruppert makes are strictly one-way. Prof. Ruppert gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations.

What is happening between Prof. Ruppert&#039;s forces and us is not a debate. It is not a friendly disagreement between enlightened people. It is an adversarial, vile attack on our most cherished institutions. Try as I may, I can&#039;t understand why Prof. Ruppert would want to take control of a nation and suck it dry. He spouts the same bile in everything he writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue Prof. Ruppert&#039;s excited about this week is sexism, which says to me that his programs of Gleichschaltung cannot stand on their own merit. That&#039;s why they&#039;re dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that the sky is falling.

In spite of the fact that slaphappy traitors are receptive to Prof. Ruppert&#039;s addlepated messages and fool easily, it is not uncommon for him to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole deluded affair as some great benefit to humanity. An understanding of the damage that may be caused by Prof. Ruppert&#039;s pompous diatribes isn&#039;t something I expect everyone to develop the first time they hear about it. That&#039;s why I write over and over again and from so many different angles about how what I have been writing up to this point is not what I initially intended to write in this letter. Instead, I decided it would be far more productive to tell you that Prof. Ruppert should start developing the parts of his brain that have been impaired by sensationalism. At least then he&#039;ll stop trying to marginalize dissident voices.

Plan to join Prof. Ruppert&#039;s camp? Be sure to check your conscience at the door. With Prof. Ruppert&#039;s op-ed pieces, simple credos like &quot;check your sources&quot; and &quot;argue the other side of the question&quot; have gone out the window. That is to say, Prof. Ruppert&#039;s secret agents must be exposed and neutralized wherever they lurk. Am I aware of how Prof. Ruppert will react when he reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because if society were a beer bottle -- something, I believe, that Prof. Ruppert holds in high regard -- he would indeed be the nauseating bit at the bottom that only the homeless like to drink. Let me close by reminding you that the statements I made about Prof. Gary D. Ruppert, Esq. in this letter are in earnest. I will not equivocate. I will not excuse. I will not retreat a single inch. And I will be heard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multifarious avenues of approach vie for attention as potential retorts to Prof. Gary D. Ruppert, Esq.&#8217;s uncongenial protests. Let me start by stressing that I am not attempting to suppress anyone&#8217;s opinions, nor do I intend to demean Prof. Ruppert personally for his beliefs or worldviews. But I do maintain that I must acknowledge that Prof. Ruppert&#8217;s apparatchiks will have to stop shouting &#8220;Me, me!&#8221; and learn to harmonize on &#8220;Us, us!&#8221;. We should not concern ourselves with his putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and with the fact that if Prof. Ruppert sincerely believes that the majority of loathsome wantwits are heroes, if not saints, then he must be smoking something illegal.</p>
<p>We must confront and reject all manifestations of factionalism. Those who claim otherwise do so only to justify their own irascible perorations. Prof. Ruppert has been trying to convince us that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors. This pathetic attempt to crush people to the earth and then claim the right to trample on them forever because they are prostrate deserves no comment other than to say that Prof. Ruppert likes thinking thoughts that aren&#8217;t burdensome and that feel good. That&#8217;s why he never seems to listen to anyone else&#8217;s positions and reasoning. Well, that&#8217;s another story. To get back to my main point, I ought to mention that all the deals Prof. Ruppert makes are strictly one-way. Prof. Ruppert gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations.</p>
<p>What is happening between Prof. Ruppert&#8217;s forces and us is not a debate. It is not a friendly disagreement between enlightened people. It is an adversarial, vile attack on our most cherished institutions. Try as I may, I can&#8217;t understand why Prof. Ruppert would want to take control of a nation and suck it dry. He spouts the same bile in everything he writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue Prof. Ruppert&#8217;s excited about this week is sexism, which says to me that his programs of Gleichschaltung cannot stand on their own merit. That&#8217;s why they&#8217;re dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that the sky is falling.</p>
<p>In spite of the fact that slaphappy traitors are receptive to Prof. Ruppert&#8217;s addlepated messages and fool easily, it is not uncommon for him to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole deluded affair as some great benefit to humanity. An understanding of the damage that may be caused by Prof. Ruppert&#8217;s pompous diatribes isn&#8217;t something I expect everyone to develop the first time they hear about it. That&#8217;s why I write over and over again and from so many different angles about how what I have been writing up to this point is not what I initially intended to write in this letter. Instead, I decided it would be far more productive to tell you that Prof. Ruppert should start developing the parts of his brain that have been impaired by sensationalism. At least then he&#8217;ll stop trying to marginalize dissident voices.</p>
<p>Plan to join Prof. Ruppert&#8217;s camp? Be sure to check your conscience at the door. With Prof. Ruppert&#8217;s op-ed pieces, simple credos like &#8220;check your sources&#8221; and &#8220;argue the other side of the question&#8221; have gone out the window. That is to say, Prof. Ruppert&#8217;s secret agents must be exposed and neutralized wherever they lurk. Am I aware of how Prof. Ruppert will react when he reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because if society were a beer bottle &#8212; something, I believe, that Prof. Ruppert holds in high regard &#8212; he would indeed be the nauseating bit at the bottom that only the homeless like to drink. Let me close by reminding you that the statements I made about Prof. Gary D. Ruppert, Esq. in this letter are in earnest. I will not equivocate. I will not excuse. I will not retreat a single inch. And I will be heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smiling Mortician</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701935</link>
		<dc:creator>Smiling Mortician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701935</guid>
		<description>Great video, ittdgy. Thanks. I&#039;m assuming everyone&#039;s seen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8y1e-z1JA0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; by now, but if not, it&#039;s a good one to show to anyone in a state that allows late registration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video, ittdgy. Thanks. I&#8217;m assuming everyone&#8217;s seen <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8y1e-z1JA0" rel="nofollow">this</a> by now, but if not, it&#8217;s a good one to show to anyone in a state that allows late registration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamFromUtah</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701891</link>
		<dc:creator>SamFromUtah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701891</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Labov pretty much invented sociolinguistics as an academic discipline, and probably knows more about dialect variation in American English than anyone.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;ve attended a lecture on sociolinguistics by Labov, and he&#039;s an amazing speaker. Not only does he know tons about dialects, he can speak them with unbelievable accuracy. He read off an example phrase in half a dozen of them, in turn, and you&#039;d really believe that for two or three words at a time he was a native speaker of each, if that makes sense.

Dude knows his shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Labov pretty much invented sociolinguistics as an academic discipline, and probably knows more about dialect variation in American English than anyone.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve attended a lecture on sociolinguistics by Labov, and he&#8217;s an amazing speaker. Not only does he know tons about dialects, he can speak them with unbelievable accuracy. He read off an example phrase in half a dozen of them, in turn, and you&#8217;d really believe that for two or three words at a time he was a native speaker of each, if that makes sense.</p>
<p>Dude knows his shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loneoak</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701884</link>
		<dc:creator>Loneoak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701884</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Maybe Putin will support the Free Alaska folks like he supported the South Ossetians.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

East Kamchatka?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Maybe Putin will support the Free Alaska folks like he supported the South Ossetians.</p></blockquote>
<p>East Kamchatka?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701883</link>
		<dc:creator>ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701883</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dependablerenegade.com/dependable_renegade/2008/10/dirty-liberals.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Watertiger - play the vid&lt;/a&gt;

You&#039;ll be glad you did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dependablerenegade.com/dependable_renegade/2008/10/dirty-liberals.html" rel="nofollow">Watertiger &#8211; play the vid</a></p>
<p>You&#8217;ll be glad you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe's Throbbing-Sixpack</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701880</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe's Throbbing-Sixpack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701880</guid>
		<description>Does Rupert&#039;s IP trace back to the Alaskan Governors office, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O&#039;reilly, Sean Hannity, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove or WIlliam Kristol? 

America wants to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Rupert&#8217;s IP trace back to the Alaskan Governors office, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O&#8217;reilly, Sean Hannity, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove or WIlliam Kristol? </p>
<p>America wants to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phleabo</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701873</link>
		<dc:creator>phleabo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701873</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Grand Moff Texan said,
October 7, 2008 at 18:24

Video: Palin’s phony accent.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m an amateur phonetician/dialectician at best, but her accent sounds fairly consistent across the recordings in that video.  There&#039;s some differences in vocabulary (more &quot;you betcha&quot;s, etc.) and a much greater range of pitch in the debate recording, but I&#039;d attribute that more to nervousness or excitement than a faked accent.

For what it&#039;s worth, Bill Labov seems to think that Palin&#039;s accent is authentic to her dialect region (listen here: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95306504).  For the non-linguists, Labov pretty much invented sociolinguistics as an academic discipline, and probably knows more about dialect variation in American English than anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Grand Moff Texan said,<br />
October 7, 2008 at 18:24</p>
<p>Video: Palin’s phony accent.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m an amateur phonetician/dialectician at best, but her accent sounds fairly consistent across the recordings in that video.  There&#8217;s some differences in vocabulary (more &#8220;you betcha&#8221;s, etc.) and a much greater range of pitch in the debate recording, but I&#8217;d attribute that more to nervousness or excitement than a faked accent.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, Bill Labov seems to think that Palin&#8217;s accent is authentic to her dialect region (listen here: <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95306504" rel="nofollow">http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95306504</a>).  For the non-linguists, Labov pretty much invented sociolinguistics as an academic discipline, and probably knows more about dialect variation in American English than anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Althouse™</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701872</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Althouse™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701872</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a real Gary Ruppert?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a real Gary Ruppert?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Righteous Bubba</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701871</link>
		<dc:creator>Righteous Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701871</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How many Americans wouldn’t mind a Weather Underground right now.

Firebombings at AEI, Club for Growth, Lehman Brothers?&lt;/i&gt;

I believe you have missed the point of almost everything in the thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How many Americans wouldn’t mind a Weather Underground right now.</p>
<p>Firebombings at AEI, Club for Growth, Lehman Brothers?</i></p>
<p>I believe you have missed the point of almost everything in the thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biff diggerence</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701870</link>
		<dc:creator>biff diggerence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701870</guid>
		<description>Force Grover Norquist to swallow an M80?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Force Grover Norquist to swallow an M80?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biff diggerence</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701869</link>
		<dc:creator>biff diggerence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701869</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t quite agree with the notion that one who associates with a former member of the Weather Underground idn&#039;t like &quot;you and me&quot;. 

How many Americans wouldn&#039;t mind a Weather Underground right now. 

Firebombings at AEI, Club for Growth, Lehman Brothers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t quite agree with the notion that one who associates with a former member of the Weather Underground idn&#8217;t like &#8220;you and me&#8221;. </p>
<p>How many Americans wouldn&#8217;t mind a Weather Underground right now. </p>
<p>Firebombings at AEI, Club for Growth, Lehman Brothers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701866</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701866</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

noen said,

October 7, 2008 at 18:17

Unhinged wingnuts are a dangerous thing. It’s getting really ugly on the pit bull campaign. Obama Hatred At McCain-Palin Rallies: “Terrorist!” “Kill Him!”
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No shit. Did you see the look on McCain&#039;s face when that guy yelled &quot;Terrorist&quot;? He obviously wasn&#039;t expecting it, and he just as obviously understands very little about this &quot;base&quot; (in more than one sense of the term) that he&#039;s decided to court. His advisers must have told him &quot;It&#039;s just a bunch of church ladies and hunters, no big deal. Just pretend you&#039;re religious, and you&#039;ve got their vote&quot;.

And now he finds himself smack dab in the middle of a lynch mob. I have no love for McCain, but I really don&#039;t think he knew what he was getting into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>noen said,</p>
<p>October 7, 2008 at 18:17</p>
<p>Unhinged wingnuts are a dangerous thing. It’s getting really ugly on the pit bull campaign. Obama Hatred At McCain-Palin Rallies: “Terrorist!” “Kill Him!”
</p></blockquote>
<p>No shit. Did you see the look on McCain&#8217;s face when that guy yelled &#8220;Terrorist&#8221;? He obviously wasn&#8217;t expecting it, and he just as obviously understands very little about this &#8220;base&#8221; (in more than one sense of the term) that he&#8217;s decided to court. His advisers must have told him &#8220;It&#8217;s just a bunch of church ladies and hunters, no big deal. Just pretend you&#8217;re religious, and you&#8217;ve got their vote&#8221;.</p>
<p>And now he finds himself smack dab in the middle of a lynch mob. I have no love for McCain, but I really don&#8217;t think he knew what he was getting into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou, Lou, the Dancing Panda</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701865</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou, Lou, the Dancing Panda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701865</guid>
		<description>When I think of John McCain&#039;s advisers huddled worriedly around the conference table, trying to plot out delicate ways to attack Obama without getting hammered by a fed-up electorate, or calculating the odds of winning this or that battle state, and then I think of how McCain comes rushing in to announce a suspension, or a character attack, or a mooseburger promotion, I feel like I&#039;ve seen it somewhere before. 

Oh yeah, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zll_jAKvarw&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;right.&lt;/a&gt;

McCain-Palin &#039;08 -- At Least They Have Chicken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I think of John McCain&#8217;s advisers huddled worriedly around the conference table, trying to plot out delicate ways to attack Obama without getting hammered by a fed-up electorate, or calculating the odds of winning this or that battle state, and then I think of how McCain comes rushing in to announce a suspension, or a character attack, or a mooseburger promotion, I feel like I&#8217;ve seen it somewhere before. </p>
<p>Oh yeah, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zll_jAKvarw" rel="nofollow">right.</a></p>
<p>McCain-Palin &#8217;08 &#8212; At Least They Have Chicken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norbizness</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701864</link>
		<dc:creator>norbizness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701864</guid>
		<description>Three years of manufacturing this comment-generator culminated in THIS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three years of manufacturing this comment-generator culminated in THIS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael G.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701863</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701863</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
I’m Sarah’s cousin, and I think that Alaska can be a self-sufficient nation, by golly youse betchum. We even manufacture our own snowmobiles here. Hmmm?…we don’t? Gee terwilligers, that’s a rum bit o’ news for us snowshoers.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You have to love secessionists in a state that gets more money from the federal government than it pays in taxes. Maybe Putin will support the Free Alaska folks like he supported the South Ossetians. It&#039;ll be a constructive learning experience for the insane right-wing fringe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
I’m Sarah’s cousin, and I think that Alaska can be a self-sufficient nation, by golly youse betchum. We even manufacture our own snowmobiles here. Hmmm?…we don’t? Gee terwilligers, that’s a rum bit o’ news for us snowshoers.
</p></blockquote>
<p>You have to love secessionists in a state that gets more money from the federal government than it pays in taxes. Maybe Putin will support the Free Alaska folks like he supported the South Ossetians. It&#8217;ll be a constructive learning experience for the insane right-wing fringe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sockpuppet  #47</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701861</link>
		<dc:creator>Sockpuppet  #47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701861</guid>
		<description>America still relies on having a 2 party system. Okay, the republicans are going to have very limited power for the next generation, but they arn&#039;t going away.

The Overton window is just going to shift a bit. When they come back to power in 30 years time, they will STILL be to the right of the democrats, but only slightly. They will be too scared to publicly advocate getting rid of the very popular social reforms enacted between now and then, but will work to undermine them quietly.

They couldn&#039;t openly kill social security after all. Too popular. In 30 years time, they will be faced with the same situation with universal healthcare. They will reduce its funding and try to undermine it, but they will not actually be able to say it is a bad idea, because of its sheer popularity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America still relies on having a 2 party system. Okay, the republicans are going to have very limited power for the next generation, but they arn&#8217;t going away.</p>
<p>The Overton window is just going to shift a bit. When they come back to power in 30 years time, they will STILL be to the right of the democrats, but only slightly. They will be too scared to publicly advocate getting rid of the very popular social reforms enacted between now and then, but will work to undermine them quietly.</p>
<p>They couldn&#8217;t openly kill social security after all. Too popular. In 30 years time, they will be faced with the same situation with universal healthcare. They will reduce its funding and try to undermine it, but they will not actually be able to say it is a bad idea, because of its sheer popularity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/12466.html#comment-701857</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=12466#comment-701857</guid>
		<description>Has anyone seen my penis? I&#039;m sure I left it around here someplace ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone seen my penis? I&#8217;m sure I left it around here someplace &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

