10
Oh, The Irony, It Stings!
ABOVE: Jules Crittenden demonstrates the proper way to
conduct a scientific experiment.
Jules Crittenden, who cites the Old Farmer’s Almanac as proof that global warming is a myth and relied on Internet rumors to fuel his fears that the Large Hadron Collider was going to destroy the entire planet, now refers to us as “Sadly, a Moron.”
Clearly the wingnuts are having great difficulty coming up with cute and clever titles they can use to ridicule us. In addition to Crittenden’s “Sadly, a Moron” we have “Sadly, Pathetic,” from America’s Worst Advice Columnist™, both of which are themselves sadly pathetic.
So, because we are both better and smarter than the objects of our derision, let’s do them a favor. Let’s come up with our own clever parodies of “Sadly, No!” that we can then let them use when they feel the need to do so. Like, say, “Tristement, Non!” or “Tristamente, Gnocchi!” Or, even better, “Leiderhosen, Nein!” which is, I must say, my current favorite, translating literally as “Sadly-Pants, No!”
Give us your suggestions in the comments.
OB-GYN Kenobi said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:22
It’s okay with me if you call me a moron, Mr. Crittenden. Just so long as I don’t actually have to be one, like you.
bud said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:26
Sadly, no . . . NOT!
Thers said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:27
I always thought there was something fishy about that Shadly No site!
I’m here all week. Try the veal.
El Cid said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:28
So, people who aren’t afraid that high energy collisions like cosmic rays which strike the Earth and Moon many times a day aren’t going to create an Earth-destroying black whole are morons?
And people who prefer NASA scientists and real climate physics and atmospheric energy budget modeling to informal records of the Old Farmer’s Almanac dealing with one small part of the globe? Morons too?
¿Lástima, No?
Blue Buddha said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:29
Happily, yes!
noen said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:30
Science is scary!
Blue Buddha said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:30
Though “Gladly, yes!” has a better ring to it.
El Cid said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:31
I suppose if I type ‘black whole’, then yeah, I guess I is moron, so Dencritter must be right. MORAN!
N__B said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:32
Sadly! Nu?
Blue Buddha said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:32
Don’t forget that one of the premises of Expelled is that science has murdered hundreds of millions of people in the past couple of centuries.
t4toby said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:33
Morosely Nil?
DUDACKATTACK!!! said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:34
FUCK NO!
FUCKIN’ A!
Scott said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:34
A nickname that Crittendumb and the other Rethugs can use for Sadly No? Gotta give them a nickname they can use — a nickname that sums up every last obsession gibbering around their empty, tumbleweed-clogged noggins:
“Fagly, No!”
michael said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:35
:(,-
Sad Leno
Blue Buddha said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:36
Sadly, Neu!
actor212 said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:36
Sadly Knows!
Clif said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:38
Better: “Fagly, No Way Girlfriend!”
rotten mcdonald said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:38
Sadly, bunch of stinking stinkers who are stupid and dumb and smell bad and aren’t part of the cool club, and are all dirty smelly Hippies and don’t have jobs and we hates hates hates them forever, we does!!!
Total Dick-Head said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:38
How about:
Guys who read stuff, you know, FAGS!
or
Sadly, Thanks But No Thanks on that Bridge to Nowhere
noen said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:38
Science = Liberal Fascism.
Roket said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:39
Scheiße, nein
noen said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:39
Sadly, Nova!
Jay B. said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:40
“Shut Up, That’s Why”
“Sadly, ‘mo” (Sadly, homosexual, you understand. it means gay.)
“No, Sad” (Hey, its how Hulk would share his feelings)
“Fucking Shut Up Already Morans”
“I’m Writing This From the Black Hole, Asshole“
cage free brown said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:41
seriously, I don’t think they want good ones.
it would appear that the worse they are the best they are.
like “dumb-o-crats”
noen said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:42
Sadly, mu!
Moominpapa said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:44
Sad Lee No – China’s leading satirical blog.
Blue Buddha said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:44
¡Chingaste, pinche gringo!
gil mann said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:44
Badly, Wrote!
RodeoBob said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:44
Maybe “SadLie Now”?
Maybe not.
Bizzaro Franklin said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:44
No beer!? D’oh!
thelogos said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:45
Since we’re all DFH now:
Empty bong? Noo!
Andy said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:49
Sadly, Nyet? (since you’re all supposedly Commies)
N__B said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:51
Blue Buddha said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:36
Sadly, Neu!
Thanks. It’s good to get reminders of how taste-free the 70s really were, lest my middle-aged DFH memory lead me down a primrose path of nostalgia.
Cangrejero said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:51
Badly so.
Moonbats, ho!
Sadly, no! Where the LIEberal lies flow.
Sadly, no! Where moonbats go when the truth they don’t want to know bugs them so.
Sadly, those entries are all sadly pathetic. Maybe Trannie Oakley was right about us.
N__B said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:51
Where’d my italics go? WP doesn’t even know who I am…
Mr. Wonderful said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:52
Adley-say, Oh-nay!
DUDACKATTACK!!! said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:52
OH NOES, SADLY
MzNicky said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:53
Didn’t we do this once before? And come up with stuff like “Badly Blow” and “Madly So” and “Radley, Bo(o)” and stuff?
C’mon, Tools Crappenten and Lame-y Alchemy! It’s not that hard! Well, for us smart kids anyway.
Josh Marshall said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:53
Crap crap there was a thread like this about two years ago but I don’t remember which or exactly where. But then, I’m a morAn.
petr said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:53
Top ten ‘alternative’ nomenclature for ‘Sadly,No!’
10) Nerdly, So!
9) Sardonically, my big toe!
8) Sardines, Pee-euw!
7) Cad, please go!
6) With the greatest sorrow for the future of the planet, I see you’re insane.
5) Cheney, Blow!
4) Eat, Crow!
3) Madly, I know!
2) Badly, Rove!
And the number ‘alternative’ nomenclature for ‘Sadly, No!’
1) Fuck, YOU!
rotten mcdonald said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:54
Sadly, Tiny Turds.
cuz Amy wanted it that way.
or maybe Shitmoat, No!
phleabo said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:54
How about Pajamas Media?
IncandenzaH said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:55
Not my sentiments about Sadly, No (je l’adore), but one that might come to mind if I hung out at Red State too often (or at all) is this one:
Tragically So-So
Or maybe something more 1984 newspeak (y’know…fer teh more literary and educated subset of the wingnut authoritarian type. If it exists. Which I kinda doubt.):
Un-happily, Un-yes
rotten mcdonald said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:55
Crap Crap Woof Talk.
….umm, that could be applied to any of their sites in reverse, I guess.
Jay B. said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:56
Madly, yo
Badly, ho
Cadly, so
Radly, whoa.
stryx said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:58
I asked the fish and it came up with
Traurig, nein!
or perhaps
?????, ???!
mat said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:59
Snidely, Yo!
stryx said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:59
Non-Cyrillic speakin’ xenophobe-ass WordPress…
Arky - Chuthuhlusexual said,
September 10, 2008 at 20:59
Play with, dough.
Marco said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:01
Simple + dirty = Sadly Blows!
D.N. Nation said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:03
IIRC, Saul (or Gary?) threatened to start his own comedy site with the name “Sadly, Yes!”.
Ernest Tee said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:05
Sadly, right again.
Ripley said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:06
Sadly, Ni!
Sadly, Nadia’s Theme
Sadly, oh no they di’int!
Sadly, Dude Where’s My Car?
Sadly, Jane stop this crazy thing!
Sadly, JULES MOTHERFUCKIN’ CRITTENDEN, MOTHERFUCKER! (this version should be imagined in the voice of Samuel L. Jackson for best results)
paul said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:09
uppity ho
c said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:11
saddle me now
handy said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:11
For Bill Shatner fans:
Boldly Go
Dreamweasel said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:13
How about “Nadly, So!” ?
The Malfunctioning Glenn Reynolds Robot said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:14
How about: Heh. Indeed.How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
How about: Heh. Indeed.
bughunter said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:16
I kinda like “Sadly, yes we have no bananas!”
dbati said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:20
You could change the entire scope of the website to document the awesomeness of “The Lord Of The Dance” and call it:
Flatley, Whoa!
Or maybe I should just shut up.
Lawnguylander said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:20
Crap crap there was a thread like this about two years ago but I don’t remember which or exactly where.
This one, yo?
bughunter said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:20
There are some good anagrams, too:
- http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=sadly+no&language=english&t=1000&d=&include=&exclude=sadly%2C+no&n=&m=&source=adv&a=n&l=n&q=n&k=1
The best are “Nosy Lad” and “A Sly Don.”
Brady's bum knee said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:21
Sardonic Nostrils
Vin Scully said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:22
If I wrote for a right-wing blog and wanted to dispute something you wrote, I’d go with something like, “According to a liberal website called ‘Sadly, No!’, blibbidy lefty bloo. Sadly, indeed, as the truth is blibbidy righty blop … ” and then I’d cite all my facts and sources.
It’s that last part that I think I’d have trouble with.
NobodySpecial said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:23
I think it’s been pretty conclusively proven that cosmic rays hitting the Earth, while they are capable of producing black holes, unerringly create them inside the skulls of wingnuts, where the adamantium laced skulls keep them from expanding.
ahem said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:23
Shitly, Moat
EcoNerd said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:25
In Bahasa Indonesia, ‘Sadly, No!’ would translate as:
Sayang, Nga!
FYI.
eidos said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:25
Sadly, no hardon?
stryx said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:27
Sadly, fap! fap! fap!
Joe Max said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:32
“Suddenly, Noogies!”
Hugh said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:37
In tribute to Ben Stein….
Sadly, Clear Eyes
Iris(TM) said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:38
Listen up, misogynists…I’ve already covered this. It should be “Sadly, O!”, because of the Obottery that goes on here.
Appalachia.
Ripley said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:41
Lastly, Throes
bartkid said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:42
Jo, nah.
jim said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:45
“Sadly, Mao!”
“Slap Me, Now!”
“Sadly, D’oh!”
“Badly, Faux!”
Those are off the top of my head.
Anagrams: Lads Yon … Ads Only … A Sly Nod … Any Sold.
Not much for an anagram generator to chew on here.
MzNicky said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:46
Breaking News: A dozen Interior Dept. officials responsible for marketing billions of dollars in oil and gas contracts had “illicit sex” with oil employees.
Which begs at least two questions:
1) What is “licit” sex?
2) Who are these sad, sad people who would have sex with anyone in this administration?
Snowwy said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:52
Shitmoat, Ho!
Clutch414 said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:55
Sniffly, Nostrils!!
stryx said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:55
2) Who are these sad, sad people who would have sex with anyone in this administration?
I’d say you’re new here, but I know better, so let’s say it’s a 5 letter word that starts with W and rhymes with whore.
That, or perhaps an editor of a notorious right wing site *cough* K-Lo *cough*
Legalize said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:56
Definitely Sadly, Maybe!
Nevermind the Sadlys
Roger Ailes said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:56
Sadly Nazis, the Liberal Fascists who are the real racists
Gary Ruppert said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:56
Heartland, Yo!
Anne Laurie said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:56
Squirrelly, News!
or
Squirrelly, Nu?
Dick said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:58
Gladly, No!
Sadly, Ho!
Sadly, Not Tan Enough!
Fadly, So!
Egads, No!
Nads, Yes!
Vastly, Lost!
Yuk, Yuk, Snort!
sagra said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:59
Buttsecks, Yes Please?
goober said,
September 10, 2008 at 21:59
Actually, I’d rather help Josh Mencken McChangeyname settle on a permanent internet handle.
How about:
1. Alawiscious O’ Tool
2. Clovis Emory Aldwinkle
3. Mor’tah Qua’alon (Klingon philosopher)
4. Virgil P. Tang, III
Any other suggestions?
scythia said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:00
Badly blow.
sagra said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:03
Snortly, Blow!
johnbinpt said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:08
How about “Sadly, the fact is…”
a concerned citizen said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:09
Tranny? Pro!
Desafortunadamente, No!
Sadly, No Class!
Saggy Ho
Bad Brie Blow
RuppertFan6969
Legalize said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:10
Virgins, Ho!
a concerned citizen said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:10
Iris, I want to see your Sadly O face.
sagra said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:11
Sadly, Here’s the proof: http://www.foxnews.com/story/...
owlbear1 said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:11
Addled Loons.
mextremist said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:13
sadly, truly, deeply, no.
dumb-ly so
paisley glow
but te chingaste pinche gringo is hte awesome
Fozzetti said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:13
Shouldn’t it be “Sadly, a Moran”?
bc said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:15
How about “Sadly, NI!”
Or, in a later thread, “Sadly, icky-icky-icky-icky-ftang-zoop-boing-zhonzj!”
Dagoril said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:15
You guys have probably seen this already, but just in case you haven’t…from the Department of Things That Should Not Be, But Sadly, Are:
http://www.herobuilders.com/08.htm
handy said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:18
I was thinking “Rick, A Moran” myself.
Garrigus Carraig said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:22
“Sizzle 2 da nizzle!”
Bigby said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:22
The thing that puzzles me (well, no, not really) about this Hardon (sic) Collider thing is this:
Why would a loving Gawd allow Us to wipe out His creation? Follow up question…if he did, wouldn’t that be, like, Teh Ultimate Rapture?
It’s stuff like this that lends credence to my theory that they don’t really Believe, that they really have no fucking Faith at all, but are just a bunch of ignorant, fearful (not only of Teh Other, but Death itself) morons who want some Big Daddy to take care of them.
If I was a True Believer (e.g. Sarah Palin), I’d be happy as shit that the world was ending in a maelstrom of Blach Hole Tidal Destructive Goodness, cuz now I’d get to go to Heaven and hang with Jeebus and George Washington. How can Gawd hold it against me that some evil commie pinko Eurotrash destroyed His World? In fact, shouldn’t I get to take the Express Elevator Up while Fritz and Pierre are rendered every so slowly to Atoms by Teh BH?
stryx said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:23
Sadly, No Cheetohz!
Rary Guppert said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:24
Nadly So?
Rary Guppert said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:25
crap, should have seen if great minds think alike first. someone already got that one.
MzNicky said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:27
Advice from The Rude Pundit today for Obama:
You should be making ads that imply McCain is too old to be president. And if you’re criticized for it, you gotta say, “I think it’s up to Senator McCain to demonstrate he has the necessary energy for this job.”
…Emasculate John McCain. Use Palin to cut his nuts off. Constantly say shit like, “Am I running against John McCain or Sarah Palin?” or “If the Republicans wanted her to be president, they should have nominated her” or “Maybe Republicans are used to a vice president that runs the show” or whatever. Make McCain have to defend himself. Turn him into Palin’s bitch. It’ll make him insane. And if there’s one thing that Republicans hate most about women, it’s the perception of the castrating bitch telling men what to do (see all the shit about Hillary Clinton).
Bigby said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:28
Gnadly, Know?
F'in Librul said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:29
Alkonholics, Ahoy!
alec said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:30
Speaking of horribly ill-advised turns of phrase: McCain recently characterized the Democrats as ‘a wolf pack‘ for attacking Palin.
The imagery, she is not so apt.
Me said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:30
Das ist schade….NEIN!
(Added benefit of being in German, accessible to wingnuts)
Rightwingsnarkle said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:32
Crap Crap Woof Talk.
Poo poo mumbles
Flatulently gross
Madly blow
The Algonquin Roundtable
Nimrod Gently said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:35
Sadly Stinky Poop Pants Poop. No.
Rightwingsnarkle said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:36
McCain recently characterized the Democrats as ‘a wolf pack‘ for attacking Palin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LK4oWay1VbE
I just watched this at work (sound off).
McP.O.W.’s gonna use up all his negativity too early, and his final ads will consist of nothing more than a closeup shot of his face, with teeth clenched and steam pouring out of his ears.
cowalker said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:37
Gnadly, low.
Linearally, toed.
Adverbally, negative.
cur said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:41
Sadsacs
or preferably
Sadsacks of shit
sagra said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:43
But it’s no fun if you don’t get to sit on a cloud and watch all the unbelievers suffer, just like you kept telling them they would, but would they believe you? Noooooooo!
sagra said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:44
Gnadly, Gnu!
Dragon-King Wangchuck said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:45
Sadly, No – you shut up!
Seditiously, No!
Suddenly Susan!
Gary Ruppert’s Place.
Suckly Gnomes!
Studly? No!
but the one I like best is:
Mos Sadly Spaceport, a wretched hive of scum and pedantry.
Dreamweasel said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:45
Sadly, No Amount of Snark Is Going to Negate the Fact That Anti-American Traitors Like Bill Ayers and Michelle Obama and That Guy at the University Who Wants to Kill the White People Whose Name I Forget But He’s Very, Very Racist and Probably a Democrat will Send Voters Running to the McCain Camp in Droves
Mephisto said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:46
Gladly so!
Egads, No!
Shabbily Slow!
GOD HELP US NO!
Clutch414 said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:47
Testicle-ly, Low!
Clutch414 said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:48
Manboobs, Ahoy!!
mextremist said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:49
and if it is open to hispanic
ni de pedo, cabrón.
nelson, vato!
chale, no!
Dick said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:50
Camel Toe!
Knights who say nee!
Snowwy said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:51
It is clear that the goob-monster has not read the original Klingon.
It should be “mortagh q’alon”. Get it right.
/Trek-geek
The Larger Truth said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:51
Do What, Now?
cowalker said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:53
Fecally, a load.
Negatively, sad.
F'in Librul said,
September 10, 2008 at 22:53
Scabby, Picked!
Shrilly, So!
Alkon, Pho!
Vagina, Ho!
Crew, Row!
sagra said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:00
If Obama loses, I’m sure it’ll be Sadness, Obots.
Paco Moreno said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:00
Sonnybo, No!
Proud Liberal said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:02
You guys have probably seen this already, but just in case you haven’t…from the Department of Things That Should Not Be, But Sadly, Are:
> http://www.herobuilders.com/08.htm
http://www.wingnuts.com sold them with a specially-sized case (144) of Kleenex.
It was instantly sold out.
rotten mcdonald said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:03
saggy, that should be “WHEN Obama loses…”
man, you can tell they’re panicking when even the trolls are losing track of the narrative.
Marco said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:04
Suddenly, Shit Moat!
djheru said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:06
faggy, ho?
gladly blow
haggy foe
madly slow
babbling, no?
pedestrian said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:07
Speaking of horribly ill-advised turns of phrase: McCain recently characterized the Democrats as ‘a wolf pack‘ for attacking Palin.
They should have shown Palin slowly rising over the horizon in a helicoptor, sparying machine gun fire.
nitpicker said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:08
Saddle me; blow!
or, alternately, Dinglebert Slappedyback.
cur said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:12
Sadly, out come the eff words and the vile, hypocritical sexist, ageist, racist slurs!
sammach woe
cowalker said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:14
Strenuously, implode.
J— said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:16
Great news for the GOP! This most certainly does not bode well for Obama.
Smut Clyde said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:17
Sadly, I’m Bradley!
TristementMalheureusement, Non!actor212 said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:18
Sorry if this one’s been posted but…
Suddenly Salad!
sagra said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:18
Cliiiiif! Make Rotten stop calling me a troll!
sagra said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:20
the Interior Department agency that collects oil and gas royalties…
They still do that? Looks like Cheney’s been dicking around on the job.
Exxon-Mobil said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:37
How about:
Unctuously, Sloe!
Sigh. Oh how we lurvs that word.
BTW – wasn’t it that the Interior Dept. employees had “oily sex with illicit employees”? We were hoping.
Jason said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:45
Seinfeld, quotes!
Smut Clyde said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:55
Sigh. Oh how we lurvs that word.
“Extreme Unction” would be a good title for a reality TV show.
Helena Handbag said,
September 10, 2008 at 23:59
The leprechaun shouting “I’m tragically malicious” made me laugh all day yesterday.
Tragically, So!
Candy said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:11
Boo hoo hoo, d’oh!
Ah stop yer whinin’, yo!
Crocodile tears, so!
Westward ho!
. . . wait a minute. What were we doing again?
I love this hypothesis so much that I would give you a huge ol’ chunk of grant money and a big lab for your research, were I an eccentric billionaire.
eidos said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:14
Have a look at this cool webcam from the Large Hadron Collider at Cern:
http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html
Doctorb said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:21
Sad Emo.
Doctorb said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:23
Hadrons, Go!
R. V. Dump said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:24
Sadly, Moe !
R. V. Dump said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:25
FYWP!
R. V. Dump said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:26
Sadly, Moe!
rotten mcdonald said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:31
sorry, sagra.
the silly season has me out of sorts.
rotten mcdonald said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:33
Smut C- I don’t think a show with ‘Unction’ in the title will fly in a country responsible for the show “Hurl”:
http://www.g4tv.com/hurl/splash.aspx
mdh said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:38
Ennui, Ennui!
Blue Raven said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:40
Between a man and a woman, in the missionary position, with the lights out so you don’t have to see what you’re doing. Everything else is far too kinky. Except anonymous blowjobs in bathroom stalls. So, in short, sex where you don’t see who you’re doing it with.
And considering we’re all a bunch of cowards and traitors, the French version is what I thought would be the obvious choice:
Tristement, Non!
Isosceles Kramer said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:48
What ever happened to ‘Sadly, Penguin Sex’ ?
Mo's Bike Shop said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:50
Sullen Nullity
Department of the Interior? Nudge, Nudge?
acrannymint said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:55
Great news for the GOP! This most certainly does not bode well for Obama.
Are you serious? The agency head is a political appointee not a career employee or is at least part of the Senior Executive Service who serve at the discretion of the secretary. Most of the offenses seem to be post 2000 so Obama can always blame the culture on the appointee/SESer.
The Dept of the Interior has always been kind of a squirelly organization. One the agencies had their internet access yanked because they imposed no security whatsoever. There was a huge suit brought against Indian Affairs for mishandling of the Indian Trust fund (Cobell vs Kempthorne).
sagra said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:59
Sadly, no harm, no foul, Rotten.
acrannymint said,
September 11, 2008 at 0:59
Correction on Cobell, the defendants are the Dept. of the Interior and the Dept. of the Treasury not BIA
acrannymint said,
September 11, 2008 at 1:01
Oops – I am definitely not firing on all cylinders. Internet access was shut down to a number of Interior’s agencies in 2001 due to a request by the plaintiffs. Access wasn’t restored until 2008.
Smut Clyde said,
September 11, 2008 at 1:17
I don’t think a show with ‘Unction’ in the title will fly
It puts the unction back in the basket, or it gets the hose again.
Robert Waldmann said,
September 11, 2008 at 1:20
I keep waiting for the popularized development of Sadly No, that is,
Sadly Kabuki
Willy said,
September 11, 2008 at 1:34
How about…
Pee Wee’s Playhouse
it seems to be out of use and it’s got a catchy opening tune.
Exxon-Mobil said,
September 11, 2008 at 1:36
Extreme Unction? Doesn’t that usually precede BOHICA?
Anonymous said,
September 11, 2008 at 1:40
Fatty, Ho.
the poster formerly known as wordyeti said,
September 11, 2008 at 1:52
Gotta recognize bc’s shout-out to the Very Silly Party’s candidate Fintinlimbim, etc. etc., above.
However:
All the schoolyard derivations of this blog’s name listed here are way too good for the unimaginative rightwing shitweasels. Although their Dark Master Rove seems to have a savant-like talent for slinging the merde … unfortunate, really, that any such talent for actually governing in a wise & responsible manner has somehow evaded the GOP gene-pool.
Meanwhile, the rumblings out in MSM-land suggest that the well-mannered lapdogs are horrified, waving hankies in the air and calling for smelling salts over the way that the McCain campaign is, you know, out-and-out lying since the convention.
Well shee-it. Wasn’t that the whole point?
Jrod said,
September 11, 2008 at 3:22
Mucho gusto, me llamo Sadly,
I’m snarkier than Ivins, Molly,
And if ya wanna get popped in your knees,
Just wipe that look off your smug ass face.
You hate me cuz I got what you need,
A brain inside my noggin that’s immume to TV,
And, if ya wanna get beat mentally,
It will be over in a minute if ya…
Monica said,
September 11, 2008 at 3:47
Since we’re all pinko commie leftists, it they really should use-
Sadly, Nyet!
Dragon-King Wangchuck said,
September 11, 2008 at 3:56
I don’t think a show with ‘Unction’ in the title will fly
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056780/
Desi SF said,
September 11, 2008 at 3:58
Gladly Blow!
or
Blow? Gladly!
Blinky, the Very Lovable Dog said,
September 11, 2008 at 4:00
I think that all the posts today are very nice.
ma said,
September 11, 2008 at 4:11
Why, THANK you, Blinky! Here – have a bizkit!
Rex, the Police Dog said,
September 11, 2008 at 4:12
Hey! I think the posts are pretty good, too! Can I have a donut?
rotten mcdonald said,
September 11, 2008 at 4:21
Dragon-King, I knew somebody would bite on that one….
I’ve been hanging here too long.
Tommykey said,
September 11, 2008 at 4:29
Commenter Sean Bannion on Crittenden’s blog post rhetorically asks
Does anyone REALLY think George Allen had ANY idea about the connotations of “macaca?” C’mon, really????
Uh, like yeah Sean, he really did. For starters, he said it twice with emphasis to the young man who was physically in Allen’s presence. Secondly, Allen’s mom came from North Africa, where live monkeys called macaques.
I would have replied on Crittenden’s blog, but I was too lazy to go through with applying for a login and password.
A labrador (not Blinky or Rex) said,
September 11, 2008 at 4:31
I would give you [...] a big lab for your research
This does not sound good.
kmeyer57 said,
September 11, 2008 at 5:28
Maybe it’s too “meta” or whatever but what about “Gladly, No!”
jack fate said,
September 11, 2008 at 5:57
Sadly, Blows!
(I’m sure it’s been mentioned already,)
Ani said,
September 11, 2008 at 6:11
Sad, eh? Ya hoser.
Amy Alkon's Testicles said,
September 11, 2008 at 7:51
Ahem.
YOU”RE ALL ONE GUY.
Tranny, Ho!
The Goddamn Batman said,
September 11, 2008 at 18:21
Atchly, Ho.
*got nuthin’*
Big Bad Bald Bastard said,
September 11, 2008 at 21:10
How ’bout: Sexy? No!
Dragon-King Wangchuck said,
September 11, 2008 at 21:56
rotten mcdonald,
I’m a sucker for low hanging froot. But if you wanna be all too clever by half about it:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0350448/releaseinfo#akas
Suggestions for Jules said,
September 12, 2008 at 18:58
Badly Faux!
Why can’t these sad fuckers mock better? They are certainly full enough of spite.
Decline and Fall said,
September 12, 2008 at 22:34
Nutly. So?
Sad Leno
Dr. Melissa Debbie ShitMoathier said,
September 13, 2008 at 6:55
Gonadally, Whoa!
Road Badly, Slow!
Volcanically, Blow!