<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nice Bristols, Luv, Shame About Yer Mum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mmmpie</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-676575</link>
		<dc:creator>Mmmpie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-676575</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;and Bristol is a poster child for how this fails.&lt;/i&gt;

The problem is that the right doesn&#039;t CARE if abstinence-only fails. They can just point their cheeto-encrusted fingers at the poor knocked-up kid and scream &quot;HEATHEN!&quot; 

Abstinence-only education isn&#039;t designed to prevent unwanted pregnancies. It&#039;s designed to shame kids who have sex and keep women who DO have sex chained to the home with a baby. It&#039;s a subtle difference, I know, but don&#039;t for a second delude yourselves into thinking the goopers have any qualms about dooming a child to a miserable life if it suits their political aims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>and Bristol is a poster child for how this fails.</i></p>
<p>The problem is that the right doesn&#8217;t CARE if abstinence-only fails. They can just point their cheeto-encrusted fingers at the poor knocked-up kid and scream &#8220;HEATHEN!&#8221; </p>
<p>Abstinence-only education isn&#8217;t designed to prevent unwanted pregnancies. It&#8217;s designed to shame kids who have sex and keep women who DO have sex chained to the home with a baby. It&#8217;s a subtle difference, I know, but don&#8217;t for a second delude yourselves into thinking the goopers have any qualms about dooming a child to a miserable life if it suits their political aims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhalgren</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675955</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhalgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675955</guid>
		<description>Do you think Obama&#039;s daughter would be left alone if she were pregnant?  Hell no.  She would be called a ho.  So we are perfectly free to attack the Palins.  We need a 527 on this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think Obama&#8217;s daughter would be left alone if she were pregnant?  Hell no.  She would be called a ho.  So we are perfectly free to attack the Palins.  We need a 527 on this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgmurphy</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675830</link>
		<dc:creator>jgmurphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675830</guid>
		<description>What blows my mind is not Palin&#039;s teen daughter&#039;s sex life (for only in GOP FantasyLand does anyone believe that teens don&#039;t have one)--but that everyone is seemingly giving the Palins a free pass on all the LIES!

Her daughter had &quot;mono&quot;?  Uh, sure.  Her water broke, but no, it didn&#039;t really break, but yes, it did break?  My daughter was NOT pregnant because my daughter IS pregnant?  Uh...okay.... Pro-life, abstinence-only, teen pregnancy bad/teen pregnancy good?  Sexed doubletalk?  Yum!

Really, it&#039;s all enough to give a rightwing columnist Tourette&#039;s.  Oh wait---they all have it already anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What blows my mind is not Palin&#8217;s teen daughter&#8217;s sex life (for only in GOP FantasyLand does anyone believe that teens don&#8217;t have one)&#8211;but that everyone is seemingly giving the Palins a free pass on all the LIES!</p>
<p>Her daughter had &#8220;mono&#8221;?  Uh, sure.  Her water broke, but no, it didn&#8217;t really break, but yes, it did break?  My daughter was NOT pregnant because my daughter IS pregnant?  Uh&#8230;okay&#8230;. Pro-life, abstinence-only, teen pregnancy bad/teen pregnancy good?  Sexed doubletalk?  Yum!</p>
<p>Really, it&#8217;s all enough to give a rightwing columnist Tourette&#8217;s.  Oh wait&#8212;they all have it already anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InsaneInTheCheneyBrain</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675805</link>
		<dc:creator>InsaneInTheCheneyBrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 06:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675805</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;We’re proud of Bristol’s decision to have her baby and&lt;/i&gt; we look forward to removing that decision-making and enforcing births as government policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We’re proud of Bristol’s decision to have her baby and</i> we look forward to removing that decision-making and enforcing births as government policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675790</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 06:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675790</guid>
		<description>Pillow Pants was obviously asleep at the wheel.

Too obscure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pillow Pants was obviously asleep at the wheel.</p>
<p>Too obscure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Zen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675357</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675357</guid>
		<description>Premarital sex = bad
Granny put career first = bad
Keeping baby = super good

A draw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Premarital sex = bad<br />
Granny put career first = bad<br />
Keeping baby = super good</p>
<p>A draw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owlbear1</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675346</link>
		<dc:creator>owlbear1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675346</guid>
		<description>You rat-fuckers huffed and puffed, pushed and prodded and you STILL had to get a lying MSM hack to make up a load shit.

You&#039;re losing it boys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You rat-fuckers huffed and puffed, pushed and prodded and you STILL had to get a lying MSM hack to make up a load shit.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re losing it boys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckc (not kc)</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675313</link>
		<dc:creator>ckc (not kc)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675313</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Are you saying Republicans are big fat lying asshat hypocrite jerkwads?&lt;/i&gt;

Well, they&#039;re certainly not all big and fat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Are you saying Republicans are big fat lying asshat hypocrite jerkwads?</i></p>
<p>Well, they&#8217;re certainly not all big and fat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smut Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675309</link>
		<dc:creator>Smut Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675309</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;teenagers’ brains aren’t necessarily capable of connecting what happens to the heifers with what their boyfriend might be doing&lt;/i&gt;
&quot;Go right ahead; she&#039;s your cow, after all.&quot;
/old joke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>teenagers’ brains aren’t necessarily capable of connecting what happens to the heifers with what their boyfriend might be doing</i><br />
&#8220;Go right ahead; she&#8217;s your cow, after all.&#8221;<br />
/old joke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MzNIcky</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675295</link>
		<dc:creator>MzNIcky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675295</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The same scenario transplanted to a Democratic VP candidate would have James Dobson and Pat Robertson railing about the evils of liberal morality. Here, it just strengthens their candidate’s pro-family bona fides.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Are you saying Republicans are big fat lying asshat hypocrite jerkwads?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The same scenario transplanted to a Democratic VP candidate would have James Dobson and Pat Robertson railing about the evils of liberal morality. Here, it just strengthens their candidate’s pro-family bona fides.</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you saying Republicans are big fat lying asshat hypocrite jerkwads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675288</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675288</guid>
		<description>About the only piece of the puzzle not currently known is the identity and age of the father, but you can bet that better muckrakers than us are already hot on the trail. The way things have been going, any bets that he&#039;s in his twenties? Maybe even &lt;i&gt;older&lt;/i&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the only piece of the puzzle not currently known is the identity and age of the father, but you can bet that better muckrakers than us are already hot on the trail. The way things have been going, any bets that he&#8217;s in his twenties? Maybe even <i>older</i>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serj!</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675267</link>
		<dc:creator>serj!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675267</guid>
		<description>From one of the wingnut websites (they all look alike to me) linked above:

Update II: Obama shows some real class (maybe his supporters could show some?) and reminds us of where he came from:

&quot;I have said before and I will repeat again: People&#039;s families are off limits,&quot; Obama said. &quot;And people&#039;s children are especially off-limits. This shouldn&#039;t be part of our politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin&#039;s performance as a governor or her potential performance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18 and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn’t be a topic of our politics.&quot;

I know it wouldn&#039;t be politically expedient, but wouldn&#039;t you love to see Obama do one of his snarky routines with this, like when he called Clinton &quot;Annie Oakley&quot;?  &quot;So, it&#039;s kinda funny, don&#039;t ya think,&quot; Obama might say as he struts back and forth on the stage, &quot;here&#039;s Miss-wholesome-family values-abstinence-only trying to quash a rumor that she is not the mother of the latest family addition but actually her 17-year-old daughter is, by saying, get this, &#039;no wait, she couldn&#039;t be the mother of that child because she was pregnant with someone else&#039;s child at the time this child was born.&#039;  I mean for crying out loud, Sarah, are you really vying for the VP slot or are you auditioning for the Jerry Springer Show?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From one of the wingnut websites (they all look alike to me) linked above:</p>
<p>Update II: Obama shows some real class (maybe his supporters could show some?) and reminds us of where he came from:</p>
<p>&#8220;I have said before and I will repeat again: People&#8217;s families are off limits,&#8221; Obama said. &#8220;And people&#8217;s children are especially off-limits. This shouldn&#8217;t be part of our politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin&#8217;s performance as a governor or her potential performance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18 and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn’t be a topic of our politics.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know it wouldn&#8217;t be politically expedient, but wouldn&#8217;t you love to see Obama do one of his snarky routines with this, like when he called Clinton &#8220;Annie Oakley&#8221;?  &#8220;So, it&#8217;s kinda funny, don&#8217;t ya think,&#8221; Obama might say as he struts back and forth on the stage, &#8220;here&#8217;s Miss-wholesome-family values-abstinence-only trying to quash a rumor that she is not the mother of the latest family addition but actually her 17-year-old daughter is, by saying, get this, &#8216;no wait, she couldn&#8217;t be the mother of that child because she was pregnant with someone else&#8217;s child at the time this child was born.&#8217;  I mean for crying out loud, Sarah, are you really vying for the VP slot or are you auditioning for the Jerry Springer Show?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675265</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675265</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It could very well be, Susan, that many of them aren’t real certain where babies come from….&lt;/i&gt;

Well, Mikey, Loretta Lynn (Queen of the &#039;Base&#039;) famously said that she&#039;d birthed two kids before she entirely understood why she kept getting pregnant.  And at that point she *still* wasn&#039;t 17.  You&#039;d think a farm girl would have a better grasp of the mechanics, but then the godless liberal scientists have established that teenagers&#039; brains aren&#039;t necessarily capable of connecting what happens to the heifers with what their boyfriend might be doing &quot;down there&quot;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It could very well be, Susan, that many of them aren’t real certain where babies come from….</i></p>
<p>Well, Mikey, Loretta Lynn (Queen of the &#8216;Base&#8217;) famously said that she&#8217;d birthed two kids before she entirely understood why she kept getting pregnant.  And at that point she *still* wasn&#8217;t 17.  You&#8217;d think a farm girl would have a better grasp of the mechanics, but then the godless liberal scientists have established that teenagers&#8217; brains aren&#8217;t necessarily capable of connecting what happens to the heifers with what their boyfriend might be doing &#8220;down there&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smut Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675192</link>
		<dc:creator>Smut Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675192</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;an immaculate spontaneous misconception&lt;/i&gt;
Surely there are already enough of those in the bloggosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>an immaculate spontaneous misconception</i><br />
Surely there are already enough of those in the bloggosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Buddha</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675175</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Buddha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675175</guid>
		<description>I like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/whats-wrong-with-this-sentence.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;538&#039;s opinion&lt;/a&gt; on Bristolgate:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I think it&#039;s wonderful that Bristol Palin has chosen to have her baby, and I&#039;m sure that she&#039;ll make a wonderful mother.

But if it&#039;s such a wonderful thing, let&#039;s be out and proud about it -- not try and change the subject. Let&#039;s disclose this in the &lt;i&gt;People&lt;/i&gt; magazine interview. Let&#039;s not bury the news when there&#039;s literally a hurricane bearing down on Louisiana. And let&#039;s sure as hell not confuse the overheated rantings of the liberal blogosphere for the series of decisions made months ago by mother and by daughter that led to a 17-year-old child becoming pregnant.

The media ought to be more responsible than to take the McCain campaign&#039;s spin at face value. If that irrelevant distraction about rumors in the blogosphere belongs in this -- than certainly things like these do: What is Palin&#039;s position on contraception? What is her position on sex education? Does she believe that sex outside of marriage is immoral? &lt;b&gt;These questions are not remotely personal, but they&#039;re certainly a part of the story.&lt;/b&gt; [emphasis mine]&lt;/blockquote&gt;As I said, it sucks that Bristol has to be drawn into this, but her mother is a high profile figure who believes that contraception and sex outside of marriage is bad, abstinence-only education works, and she&#039;s willing to force this down our throats.  That her daughter got knocked up and that she was hiding it shows that her belief doesn&#039;t work, and she&#039;s being evasive about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/whats-wrong-with-this-sentence.html" rel="nofollow">538&#8242;s opinion</a> on Bristolgate:</p>
<blockquote><p>I think it&#8217;s wonderful that Bristol Palin has chosen to have her baby, and I&#8217;m sure that she&#8217;ll make a wonderful mother.</p>
<p>But if it&#8217;s such a wonderful thing, let&#8217;s be out and proud about it &#8212; not try and change the subject. Let&#8217;s disclose this in the <i>People</i> magazine interview. Let&#8217;s not bury the news when there&#8217;s literally a hurricane bearing down on Louisiana. And let&#8217;s sure as hell not confuse the overheated rantings of the liberal blogosphere for the series of decisions made months ago by mother and by daughter that led to a 17-year-old child becoming pregnant.</p>
<p>The media ought to be more responsible than to take the McCain campaign&#8217;s spin at face value. If that irrelevant distraction about rumors in the blogosphere belongs in this &#8212; than certainly things like these do: What is Palin&#8217;s position on contraception? What is her position on sex education? Does she believe that sex outside of marriage is immoral? <b>These questions are not remotely personal, but they&#8217;re certainly a part of the story.</b> [emphasis mine]</p></blockquote>
<p>As I said, it sucks that Bristol has to be drawn into this, but her mother is a high profile figure who believes that contraception and sex outside of marriage is bad, abstinence-only education works, and she&#8217;s willing to force this down our throats.  That her daughter got knocked up and that she was hiding it shows that her belief doesn&#8217;t work, and she&#8217;s being evasive about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innocent Bystander</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675143</link>
		<dc:creator>Innocent Bystander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675143</guid>
		<description>Would anyone be surprised if Bristol has an immaculate spontaneous misconception in a few weeks?

I mean...5 months pregnant?  Announced just as the mom-had-her-daughter&#039;s-baby was starting to crank up?  Pretty amazing coincidence, is it not?

And so McCain knows that his perspective VP has a 5 month old baby with special needs AND a 17YO, soon-to-be mother....and he decides to go along with this selection?  Are you f&#039;ing kidding me?

I can&#039;t imagine a more screwed up selection for VP....just think what&#039;s in store for this country if these jokers somehow get elected...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would anyone be surprised if Bristol has an immaculate spontaneous misconception in a few weeks?</p>
<p>I mean&#8230;5 months pregnant?  Announced just as the mom-had-her-daughter&#8217;s-baby was starting to crank up?  Pretty amazing coincidence, is it not?</p>
<p>And so McCain knows that his perspective VP has a 5 month old baby with special needs AND a 17YO, soon-to-be mother&#8230;.and he decides to go along with this selection?  Are you f&#8217;ing kidding me?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t imagine a more screwed up selection for VP&#8230;.just think what&#8217;s in store for this country if these jokers somehow get elected&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goober</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675125</link>
		<dc:creator>goober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675125</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You have to wonder if Sarah Palin will be charging the young man who impregnated her 17-year-old daughter with statutory rape.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think marriage would be enough of a sentence for the poor sap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You have to wonder if Sarah Palin will be charging the young man who impregnated her 17-year-old daughter with statutory rape.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think marriage would be enough of a sentence for the poor sap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Curl</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675123</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Curl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675123</guid>
		<description>From the Palins&#039; press release:
&lt;blockquote&gt;We&#039;re proud of Bristol&#039;s decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And this here liberal is proud that once again, a conservative family has seen the wisdom of a liberal policy.  In this case, it&#039;s letting a young woman under the age of majority make her own decision about her body and future.  Let&#039;s hope that this pro-choice position becomes part of the Republican Party platform.

I imagine it could also be another case of a conservative family seeing the necessity of a comprehensive sex ed curriculum.  Maybe this will be the death knell for the ridiculous abstinence-only programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Palins&#8217; press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;re proud of Bristol&#8217;s decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents.</p></blockquote>
<p>And this here liberal is proud that once again, a conservative family has seen the wisdom of a liberal policy.  In this case, it&#8217;s letting a young woman under the age of majority make her own decision about her body and future.  Let&#8217;s hope that this pro-choice position becomes part of the Republican Party platform.</p>
<p>I imagine it could also be another case of a conservative family seeing the necessity of a comprehensive sex ed curriculum.  Maybe this will be the death knell for the ridiculous abstinence-only programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smut Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675115</link>
		<dc:creator>Smut Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675115</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Did you know that a MAGICAL SKY FAIRY watches your vajayjay and decides whether to torture you for eternity based on what he sees?&lt;/i&gt;
I&#039;m sick of that genre of horror movie. &#039;7even&#039; was good but all its imitators have been downhill.

&lt;i&gt;You sure those are Walrus entrails buried in the back yard?&lt;/i&gt;

As &lt;strike&gt;they say&lt;/strike&gt; Kliban said, You walrus hurt the one you love...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Did you know that a MAGICAL SKY FAIRY watches your vajayjay and decides whether to torture you for eternity based on what he sees?</i><br />
I&#8217;m sick of that genre of horror movie. &#8217;7even&#8217; was good but all its imitators have been downhill.</p>
<p><i>You sure those are Walrus entrails buried in the back yard?</i></p>
<p>As <strike>they say</strike> Kliban said, You walrus hurt the one you love&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christian h.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/11488.html#comment-675114</link>
		<dc:creator>christian h.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=11488#comment-675114</guid>
		<description>Yuck, people, stop it. First those &quot;hilbilly&quot; comments are just reinforcing the idea that liberals are arrogant prigs who look down on working class people. Second, this says nothing about Palins politics, or whether she would make a good president, anymore than Clinton&#039;s inability to keep it zipped, or his lying about it, made him a worse president. 

It&#039;s clear independent of this that Palin&#039;s politics are horrible and her executive experience is nil. There&#039;s enough that&#039;s fair game here, for examle McCain&#039;s age in relation to the lack of preparation of Palin&#039;s. But I really think we should leave this pregnancy out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yuck, people, stop it. First those &#8220;hilbilly&#8221; comments are just reinforcing the idea that liberals are arrogant prigs who look down on working class people. Second, this says nothing about Palins politics, or whether she would make a good president, anymore than Clinton&#8217;s inability to keep it zipped, or his lying about it, made him a worse president. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear independent of this that Palin&#8217;s politics are horrible and her executive experience is nil. There&#8217;s enough that&#8217;s fair game here, for examle McCain&#8217;s age in relation to the lack of preparation of Palin&#8217;s. But I really think we should leave this pregnancy out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

