I do not understand what foul mechanical shenanigans made “useless” the first of the Tag Suggestions though.

Is it time for my close up, Mr. DeMille?

STOP MAKING FUN OF ME!!!11!

Ah, the days of navigating with a white cane and guide dog….remember them “Well”…

She is stuck in the psychological development stage most people leave around the age of 4 or 5.

This MORE-THAN-OBVIOUS message has been brought to you by Kaopectate, freeing up stuck turds for 50 years.

Cool to see some old-time Internet users here.

I might take the cake on being an old-timer. When I started using USENET there were only 95 newsgroups. I remember having to always find the route to mtuxo for bang-addressed email, because mtuxo was a gateway to everything else. This was in the days when domain addressing was just a dream.

(not that you guys give a shit about the truth, as it tends to get in the way of your reason for being, leaving tiny comment turds on the sites of people you disagree with:

not that Amy would ever leave shitty commentary here like:

Hold yourself closer Tiny Turd….How many times must I explain, tiny turd? … I hate anyone named Lesley.

and

Your ip is
IP address [?]: 140.90.2×3.x7 [Whois]
IP address country: ip address flag Commie
IP address state: Maryland
IP address city: Suitland
IP address latitude: 38.832401
IP address longitude: -76.908401
ISP of this IP [?]: Commie Sh:t
Organization: National Organizations of Commies

I called you up and made you cry.

Strange how Amy thinks everything to the left of neoconservative Republican is communist or socialist. Kind of like neoconservative ignoramuses do. And she calls us liars?

Then there’s her narcissism:

I am IMPORTANT to these people. I find that kind of amazing.
Posted by: Amy Alkon at August 24, 2008 7:46 AM

and

I just love the attention, so thanks. By the way, the book in the photo of me is actually Elmore Leonard’s The Hot Kid, which is a terrific story set in the days of Pretty Boy Floyd: http://tinyurl.com/TheHotKid

How does she reconcile banning everyone from SN and simultaneously making efforts to court our attention?

Is it possible that the reason for that is because your actual actions, such as obsessively chasing down someone who hurt your widdle fee-fees on the Internet and trying to get him fired, show you to be a shallow, vindictive shit of a person?

It may well be that nobody gives a crap about the thoughts of a human turd such as yourself, nomatter how glorious you believe them to be.

And the thing is, I’m not so easy to pigeonhole as a conservative, but the reason these tiny thugs are discussion-ruiners here is that they aren’t interested in what I really think, and make that clear by ignoring, for example, when I explained that I don’t simply use “litter” in reference to black people but showed how I use it about rich white women and anyone who has lots of children.

For the record, I’m fiscally conservative and socially libertarian.

For the record, while you resist being pigeon-holed, you’ve done nothing but trash liberals and promote (neoconservative) Republicans. You also have an astounding ability to paint every SN reader (and liberal) with the same brush, regardless of how we’ve behaved on your site. Although you say you’re fair and open to comments you’ve banned those who’ve bent over backwards to be polite and civil along with the idiots who find juvenile glee in ridiculing your appearance and so on (something I don’t agree with). So you’re not very discriminating.

It’s also interesting how you, although you ban anyone who looks sideways at you, you drop in here periodically to call us all feces. If someone from here called you feces, you’d ban them because you have standards (or something).

In other words, although you won’t tolerate juvenile and insulting behaviour in your comment thread, you have no problem behaving like an asshole in here. You are free to do so, of course, since the SN operators aren’t threatened and don’t stay up nights fretting about comments. Well, they do draw a line at people who post IP addresses, names, and other personal information because that’s the mark of someone who hasn’t got a shred of decency or integrity.

This has positively made my weekend. No one’s ever considered me dangerous before!

She’s ugly on the inside.

Well, beauty is only skin deep.

But ugly goes straight to the bone.

Lesley said,
August 29, 2008 at 9:42

Also, Ames, I’m surprised you’re not banning yourself repeatedly from your own site since you seem to breaking so many of your own rules.

For someone who cries foul about every dick, tom and harry that offends your delicate sensibilities, you are a hypocrite since you persist in making slanderous and untruthful remarks about SN.

Hold yourself closer Tiny Turd,
And the thing is, I’m not so easy to pigeonhole as a conservative, but the reason these tiny thugs are discussion-ruiners here is that they aren’t interested in what I really think, and make that clear by ignoring, for example, when I explained that I don’t simply use “litter” in reference to black people but showed how I use it about rich white women and anyone who has lots of children.

For the record, I’m fiscally conservative and socially libertarian.