<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yokel, 1; Global Warmin&#8217; Perfessers, 0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html</link>
	<description>Poise! Poise!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meghan</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-650571</link>
		<dc:creator>Meghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-650571</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not like they&#039;re positing that unicorns exist.  Surely even deniers of global warming can accept that floods happen, with or without Photoshop.  If this were a scientific paper on the Loch Ness monster, I could see the outrage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not like they&#8217;re positing that unicorns exist.  Surely even deniers of global warming can accept that floods happen, with or without Photoshop.  If this were a scientific paper on the Loch Ness monster, I could see the outrage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-650460</link>
		<dc:creator>noen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-650460</guid>
		<description>tufdaawg
&lt;i&gt;give me links or data to disprove his “32000 scientists don’t believe in GW”.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tufdaawg<br />
<i>give me links or data to disprove his “32000 scientists don’t believe in GW”.</i></p>
<p><a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics" rel="nofollow">How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mwb</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-650329</link>
		<dc:creator>mwb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-650329</guid>
		<description>Well, when the only content in a report that you can approach is the pictures they become serious business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, when the only content in a report that you can approach is the pictures they become serious business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getaclue</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-650258</link>
		<dc:creator>getaclue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-650258</guid>
		<description>These fools are like people standing around in a burning building arguing about who set the fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These fools are like people standing around in a burning building arguing about who set the fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick head</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-650098</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-650098</guid>
		<description>Who f**kin&#039; cares.  Get over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who f**kin&#8217; cares.  Get over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smut Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649959</link>
		<dc:creator>Smut Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649959</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What number or percentage of fake photographs in a government scientific report would be problematic for you?&lt;/i&gt;
In a draft copy, a 0% level would be problematic to me. It would suggest that the authors were putting more effort into the images than into the science of the report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What number or percentage of fake photographs in a government scientific report would be problematic for you?</i><br />
In a draft copy, a 0% level would be problematic to me. It would suggest that the authors were putting more effort into the images than into the science of the report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649948</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649948</guid>
		<description>Well played, all. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.answers.com/hick&amp;r=67&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chawbacons&lt;/a&gt; over at the site that thinks Sadly No links have cooties are all worked up. If this is media criticism, no wonder things are as hosed up as they are. 

As I left in a comment over there, have any of them ever created a work for publication that didn&#039;t feature the use of crayons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well played, all. The <a href="http://www.answers.com/hick&amp;r=67" rel="nofollow">chawbacons</a> over at the site that thinks Sadly No links have cooties are all worked up. If this is media criticism, no wonder things are as hosed up as they are. </p>
<p>As I left in a comment over there, have any of them ever created a work for publication that didn&#8217;t feature the use of crayons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owlbear1</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649946</link>
		<dc:creator>owlbear1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649946</guid>
		<description>You know Anonymous, its not so much the number of fake pictures in the report but the declaration that all of the science in the report must certainly be garbage because of a SINGLE artist&#039;s rendition.


Get it?

Ignorant accusation based on a total inability to distinguish fantasy from reality.

Some of Shakespeare&#039;s best gags  hinge on the concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know Anonymous, its not so much the number of fake pictures in the report but the declaration that all of the science in the report must certainly be garbage because of a SINGLE artist&#8217;s rendition.</p>
<p>Get it?</p>
<p>Ignorant accusation based on a total inability to distinguish fantasy from reality.</p>
<p>Some of Shakespeare&#8217;s best gags  hinge on the concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctorb</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649943</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctorb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649943</guid>
		<description>Actually, I&#039;ve been to a lot of scientific talks, and given a few myself (I am a real doctor, not in climatology, by the way), and it&#039;s pretty common to see stock photos, pictures from advertisements, and pics from sites like The Onion.  

Also placeholder pictures in mockups, but that&#039;s a no-brainer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;ve been to a lot of scientific talks, and given a few myself (I am a real doctor, not in climatology, by the way), and it&#8217;s pretty common to see stock photos, pictures from advertisements, and pics from sites like The Onion.  </p>
<p>Also placeholder pictures in mockups, but that&#8217;s a no-brainer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Righteous Bubba</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649905</link>
		<dc:creator>Righteous Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649905</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What number or percentage of fake photographs in a government scientific report would be problematic for you?&lt;/i&gt;

...said Anonymous, the most anonymous of anonymousites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What number or percentage of fake photographs in a government scientific report would be problematic for you?</i></p>
<p>&#8230;said Anonymous, the most anonymous of anonymousites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649902</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649902</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you click through Gomer Bile’s links, you’ll discover that his fauxtrage is directed at one photo (out of hundreds illustrations, photographs and graphics ...&quot;

What number or percentage of fake photographs in a government scientific report would be problematic for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you click through Gomer Bile’s links, you’ll discover that his fauxtrage is directed at one photo (out of hundreds illustrations, photographs and graphics &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>What number or percentage of fake photographs in a government scientific report would be problematic for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smut Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649747</link>
		<dc:creator>Smut Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649747</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s more, mad scientists have &lt;a href=&quot;http://wearscience.com/img450/kiss_the_cloner.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;better barbecues&lt;/A&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s more, mad scientists have <a href="http://wearscience.com/img450/kiss_the_cloner.gif" rel="nofollow">better barbecues</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjacques</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649725</link>
		<dc:creator>bjacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649725</guid>
		<description>Goddammit! I wanna see some *mad science* ! CY and his ilk trash real science with their bullshit, they deserve to be set upon by mad scientists drunk on bathtub Pan-Galactic Gargle Blasters drilling Schloss Confederate Yankee with honking big mean-ass death rays. We&#039;ll drink your fuckin&#039; milkshake and toast yer grill, &#039;cause we&#039;re SCIENCE!!!

I&#039;m pretty skeptical about Dead Anthrax Guy, but I kinda hope he really was a Democrat. We need more Democratic mad scientists, not for killing unlucky bystanders, but for putting the fear of Darwin and Einstein into them. Doktor Sleepless for President!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goddammit! I wanna see some *mad science* ! CY and his ilk trash real science with their bullshit, they deserve to be set upon by mad scientists drunk on bathtub Pan-Galactic Gargle Blasters drilling Schloss Confederate Yankee with honking big mean-ass death rays. We&#8217;ll drink your fuckin&#8217; milkshake and toast yer grill, &#8217;cause we&#8217;re SCIENCE!!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty skeptical about Dead Anthrax Guy, but I kinda hope he really was a Democrat. We need more Democratic mad scientists, not for killing unlucky bystanders, but for putting the fear of Darwin and Einstein into them. Doktor Sleepless for President!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sagra</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649667</link>
		<dc:creator>sagra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649667</guid>
		<description>Dear wingers. We&#039;re not anti-America.  We&#039;re just anti-YOU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear wingers. We&#8217;re not anti-America.  We&#8217;re just anti-YOU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ruppert Number Two</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649643</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ruppert Number Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649643</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Has Gary just been DN the whole time?&lt;/i&gt;

The fact is, no.  Many people have played Gary Ruppert over the years, including myself on numerous occasions.  It&#039;s like Hamlet.  Everyone takes a stab at the role.

The fact is, there is a real, genuine Gary Ruppert.  And he&#039;s usually easy to spot, but he&#039;s as rare as a Peruvian dumplesmfhsshf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Has Gary just been DN the whole time?</i></p>
<p>The fact is, no.  Many people have played Gary Ruppert over the years, including myself on numerous occasions.  It&#8217;s like Hamlet.  Everyone takes a stab at the role.</p>
<p>The fact is, there is a real, genuine Gary Ruppert.  And he&#8217;s usually easy to spot, but he&#8217;s as rare as a Peruvian dumplesmfhsshf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt T.</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649602</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649602</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I sometimes feel bad about the whole “let’s mock stupid and/or crazy people” thing, so it’s important to remember that these guys are somehow agenda-setters.&lt;/i&gt;

 It&#039;s not just that. They&#039;re agresively stupid. Proud of their ignorance, they&#039;ll cut you if you try to shake up their notions at all. Look at the evolution thing They&#039;re so myopic and petty that they simply cannot stand the idea of someone looking at the world different from the way they do. Look at the abortion thing. They&#039;re so terrified of having to admit &lt;i&gt;they might not know something&lt;/i&gt;, they&#039;ll cling to long-disproved nonsense and scream about semantics instead of having to humble themselves before anyone. Look at the Iraq thing.

 Stupid people don&#039;t hurt anybody; assholes do. Owens&#039; problem ain&#039;t that he&#039;s dumber than a bucket of shit, it&#039;s that he demands the rest of us be that stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I sometimes feel bad about the whole “let’s mock stupid and/or crazy people” thing, so it’s important to remember that these guys are somehow agenda-setters.</i></p>
<p> It&#8217;s not just that. They&#8217;re agresively stupid. Proud of their ignorance, they&#8217;ll cut you if you try to shake up their notions at all. Look at the evolution thing They&#8217;re so myopic and petty that they simply cannot stand the idea of someone looking at the world different from the way they do. Look at the abortion thing. They&#8217;re so terrified of having to admit <i>they might not know something</i>, they&#8217;ll cling to long-disproved nonsense and scream about semantics instead of having to humble themselves before anyone. Look at the Iraq thing.</p>
<p> Stupid people don&#8217;t hurt anybody; assholes do. Owens&#8217; problem ain&#8217;t that he&#8217;s dumber than a bucket of shit, it&#8217;s that he demands the rest of us be that stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowwy</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649598</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowwy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649598</guid>
		<description>*swoon*  Kevvie&#039;s over there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*swoon*  Kevvie&#8217;s over there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoosier X</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649564</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoosier X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649564</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; If they put such little work in the images, it you wonder how much effort they put into the logic of the post, doesn’t it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You don&#039;t have to wonder.

You can just read it.

Don&#039;t forget Petersen&#039;s Field Guide for Identifying the Logical Fallacies of the American Conservative.

Go to the Petersen&#039;s Web site for a check list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> If they put such little work in the images, it you wonder how much effort they put into the logic of the post, doesn’t it?</p></blockquote>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to wonder.</p>
<p>You can just read it.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget Petersen&#8217;s Field Guide for Identifying the Logical Fallacies of the American Conservative.</p>
<p>Go to the Petersen&#8217;s Web site for a check list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649510</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649510</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Bud said,
I am outraged. That is clearly not the real Mohammed wearing a turban-bomb, but merely a drawing of a figure who could, quite frankly, be almost anyone. &lt;/i&gt;

Indeed. If they put such little work in the images, it you wonder how much effort they put into the logic of the post, doesn’t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Bud said,<br />
I am outraged. That is clearly not the real Mohammed wearing a turban-bomb, but merely a drawing of a figure who could, quite frankly, be almost anyone. </i></p>
<p>Indeed. If they put such little work in the images, it you wonder how much effort they put into the logic of the post, doesn’t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctorb</title>
		<link>http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10529.html#comment-649495</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctorb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadlyno.com/?p=10529#comment-649495</guid>
		<description>Plus I like to think of S,N! as more of a snark-mongering site.  I sometimes feel bad about the whole &quot;let&#039;s mock stupid and/or crazy people&quot; thing, so it&#039;s important to remember that these guys are somehow agenda-setters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus I like to think of S,N! as more of a snark-mongering site.  I sometimes feel bad about the whole &#8220;let&#8217;s mock stupid and/or crazy people&#8221; thing, so it&#8217;s important to remember that these guys are somehow agenda-setters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

