So unless Iâ€™m engaging in some very fast multitaskingâ€”putting up the post, altering her comments, etc., she said what she said. And itâ€™s there for all to see. In fact, she comments in the very thread where I reproduced it, and doesnâ€™t mention anything about the comment being false or altered in any way.
In fact, hereâ€™s another mention of her wanting me to kiss the â€œspawnâ€? for her. Still no suggestion I altered the comment.
But does that stop the folks from Sadly, No! from going to bat for her? Well, SADLY, NO!
Jeffster- please tell us how we “went to bat for her.” Perhaps you were referring to my statement here:
What Frisch did was vile. We condemn her for it. All of us.
Yeah, that sounds like a full-fledged endorsement to me!
Now, I wonder if anyone on the right-blogosphere would be so kind to condemn Jeff for saying this:
Incidentally, Tim? I touched your sister in her secret places. Lots.
Posted by: Jeff G at November 17, 2005 10:42 PM
Additionally, I propose that the following two facts are not mutually exclusive:
1. Weblogger Jeff Goldstein is – and I speak from long experience here – a truly sad and embarrassing figure.
2. It isnâ€™t even remotely cool to talk shit about, or make threats towards, peopleâ€™s small children. This is pretty much a context-independent thing.
So say we all.