(I’m gonna put this below the fold because, trust me, it’s not for the faint of heart, and not in an “oy this is stupid” sort of way. It’s seriously extremely offensive. You have been warned.)
Sex, Security and PC Heresy
By Max Ross
“Treat a lady like a whore and a whore like a lady and you’ll never go wrong.” Words of wisdom from my late uncle, an average looking fellow who was 5’7″ bald, slightly overweight and had more ladies on the string than I could count. How did he do that?
Well, judging from his quote, he paid for a lot of whores.
After the end of his first marriage (but regrettably not his last) Uncle Donald always had a date… always.
Working at a morgue will do that for you.
As my own father was something of a dolt when it came to the true nature of women, my dear uncle was kind enough to explain to me a great many things.
“First, treat a whore like a lady. Second, treat a cadaver like a whore. Third, treat a lady like a cadaver.”
Almost universal among mammals, ‘nature’ has mostly opted to leave the desires of females out of the equation in regards to procreating.
Uh, I pretty sure it was “nature” that gave women clitori, Max…
Yes, females are more receptive at some times, but the male in most of these species, especially primates, generally takes a female at his whim.
And because Max never evolved above the level of primate, he knows what he’s talking about.
Human beings are not much different than are tree swinging, sexually uninhibited cousins in this respect. Men are psychologically hardwired for sex and women are emotionally hardwired for security, and both genders are willing to trade one for the other.
So ladies, you should only sleep with a guy if he gives you money. Sure, that technically makes you a whore, but it’s the way nature made you.
Hunt, gather, fight, copulate? these are the four basic ‘drives’ of man. Whether you believe in evolution, creation or intelligent design, the human male is uniquely designed and desirous to accomplish these tasks.
Max is living proof that intelligent design is bogus, since no intelligent entity would ever create something so stupid.
In human men, sperm production is so ridiculously high that 23 men in a period of one month could produce enough gene juice to impregnate and repopulate the entire planet, currently standing at around 6 billion…
Max sounds like a pretty romantic guy, ladies. I dunno about you, but just hearing him say all them purtty words makes me want to get sprayed with his gene juice.
Basically, the boys were designed to ‘hit’ as many females in the shortest period of time, whether the women want to mate or not. Through out human history this has been the ‘natural order.’
Yes, throughout human history, rape has been the “natural order.”
One of the most interesting web sites on the subject of ‘consensual non-consent’ is taken in hand, ran by a lovely woman who truly believes women and men are better if the man is in charge.
Especially if they’re the type of guys who read Men’s News Daily:
Sarah Penny (definitely not her real name) has mused on many occasions as to the excitement and security of being taken forcibly by a man. ‘It is soooo hot’ she mention during one conversation. In her most explosive article to date “When Rape is a Gift” Sarah explains the following to ‘civilized’ men who are interested in pleasing an adventurous woman:
“He must have faith that she knows what she wants and is willing to take the risk. He must believe in his ability not to misjudge the situation, and in the woman’s ability to deal with it well if he does. He must be willing to be profoundly and intensely intimate with the other person.”
So real men never need a woman’s consent, since they use their hyper-masculine instincts to detect a woman’s true desires.
In other words, don’t listen to her- you know she wants it.
From a civilized standpoint, a Judeo-Christian standpoint, people would write this off as heretical, dangerous and degrading to women.
That is how most people feel about rape, yes.
But what if she wants it that way? If this is the natural order and men have evolved or were designed to breed regardless of context, is it not possible or even probable that females have a deep, abiding need to be taken, dominated and then provided for? Yes Hunt-Gather-Fight-Screw is important, but what about Gestate-Lactate-Nurture-Educate, the four basic drives of a woman?
Well Max, your own mother certainly failed in the “education” department. I bet she has a big ol’ penis.
Someone needs to raise the young and females are primarily designed and qualified for this task.
That’s right, they’re designed to live with the consequences of male rape sprees.
In the context of consensual non-consent, both parties are simply acting out what has been programmed into them genetically. Of course, in a modern society all of this interaction requires order… men can’t ‘have’ anyone they want, and women have a way becoming ‘control freaks’ if left to their own desires.
So if a woman tells you “no,” she’s just a bitchy control freak who wants to shove you into her womb.
In my own experiences, no less five lovers have confessed their desire to be taken and ravaged. Two of them wanted it at random; after work in her parking garage, the other suggested I break into her home and wait.
“A third suggested that I strangle her to death and have my way with her rotting corpse. Hey, it’s what Uncle Donald always did!”
On neither of these requests did I acquiesce. It sounded like a great way to get shot, beat up by some guy wanting to be a hero or (gasp) what if I got the wrong woman? Orange suits, cages and a ‘boyfriend’ named Bubba don’t appeal to me.
No, but it’s probably what you deserve.
Sarah and her friends are welcome to their desires and maybe someday this will be alluring, but under the current realities of gender relations, the ‘natural order’ will have to wait.
“Yeah, I used to rape five women a day before the liberals in Washington said it wasn’t ‘politically correct.’”